text:
Constitution
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
For other uses, see Constitution (disambiguation).
Copy of the Magna Carta from 1297.
A constitution is a set of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is governed.[1] These rules together make up, i.e. constitute, what the entity is. When these principles are written down into a single document or set of legal documents, those documents may be said to embody a written constitution; if they are written down in a single comprehensive document, it is said to embody a codified constitution. Some constitutions (such as the constitution of the United Kingdom) are uncodified, but written in numerous fundamental Acts of a legislature, court cases or treaties.[2]
Constitutions concern different levels of organizations, from sovereign states to companies and unincorporated associations. A treaty which establishes an international organization is also its constitution, in that it would define how that organization is constituted. Within states, a constitution defines the principles upon which the state is based, the procedure in which laws are made and by whom. Some constitutions, especially codified constitutions, also act as limiters of state power, by establishing lines which a state's rulers cannot cross, such as fundamental rights.
The Constitution of India is the longest written constitution of any sovereign country in the world,[3] containing 444 articles in 22 parts,[4][5] 12 schedules and 118 amendments, with 146,385 words[6] in its English-language version,[7] while the Constitution of Monaco is the shortest written constitution, containing 10 chapters with 97 articles, and a total of 3,814 words.[8][6]
Contents
[hide]
1 Etymology
2 General features
3 History and development
3.1 Pre-modern constitutions
3.1.1 Ancient
3.1.2 Dark ages and early Middle ages
3.1.3 Middle ages after 1000
3.1.4 Iroquois "Great Law of Peace"
3.2 Modern constitutions
3.2.1 Democratic constitutions
4 Principles of constitutional design
5 Governmental constitutions
5.1 Key features
5.1.1 Classification
5.1.2 Codification
5.1.2.1 Codified constitution
5.1.2.2 Uncodified constitution
5.1.2.3 Written versus unwritten; codified versus uncodified
5.1.3 Entrenchment
5.1.3.1 Absolutely unmodifiable articles
5.1.4 Distribution of sovereignty
5.1.5 Separation of powers
5.1.6 Lines of accountability
5.1.7 State of emergency
5.2 Facade constitutions
6 Constitutional courts
7 See also
8 References
9 External links
Etymology
The term constitution comes through French from the Latin word constitutio, used for regulations and orders, such as the imperial enactments (constitutiones principis: edicta, mandata, decreta, rescripta).[9] Later, the term was widely used in canon law for an important determination, especially a decree issued by the Pope, now referred to as an apostolic constitution.
General features
Generally, every modern written constitution confers specific powers to an organization or institutional entity, established upon the primary condition that it abide by the said constitution's limitations. According to Scott Gordon, a political organization is constitutional to the extent that it "contain[s] institutionalized mechanisms of power control for the protection of the interests and liberties of the citizenry, including those that may be in the minority".[10]
Activities of officials within an organization or polity that fall within the constitutional or statutory authority of those officials are termed "within power" (or, in Latin, intra vires); if they do not, they are termed "beyond power" (or, in Latin, ultra vires). For example, a students' union may be prohibited as an organization from engaging in activities not concerning students; if the union becomes involved in non-student activities, these activities are considered to be ultra vires of the union's charter, and nobody would be compelled by the charter to follow them. An example from the constitutional law of sovereign states would be a provincial parliament in a federal state trying to legislate in an area that the constitution allocates exclusively to the federal parliament, such as ratifying a treaty. Action that appears to be beyond power may be judicially reviewed and, if found to be beyond power, must cease. Legislation that is found to be beyond power will be "invalid" and of no force; this applies to primary legislation, requiring constitutional authorization, and secondary legislation, ordinarily requiring statutory authorization. In this context, "within power", intra vires, "authorized" and "valid" have the same meaning; as do "beyond power", ultra vires, "not authorized" and "invalid".
In most but not all modern states the constitution has supremacy over ordinary statutory law (see Uncodified constitution below); in such states when an official act is unconstitutional, i.e. it is not a power granted to the government by the constitution, that act is null and void, and the nullification is ab initio, that is, from inception, not from the date of the finding. It was never "law", even though, if it had been a statute or statutory provision, it might have been adopted according to the procedures for adopting legislation. Sometimes the problem is not that a statute is unconstitutional, but the application of it is, on a particular occasion, and a court may decide that while there are ways it could be applied that are constitutional, that instance was not allowed or legitimate. In such a case, only the application may be ruled unconstitutional. Historically, the remedy for such violations have been petitions for common law writs, such as quo warranto.
History and development
Pre-modern constitutions
Ancient
Detail from Hammurabi's stele shows him receiving the laws of Babylon from the seated sun deity.
Excavations in modern-day Iraq by Ernest de Sarzec in 1877 found evidence of the earliest known code of justice, issued by the Sumerian king Urukagina of Lagash ca 2300 BC. Perhaps the earliest prototype for a law of government, this document itself has not yet been discovered; however it is known that it allowed some rights to his citizens. For example, it is known that it relieved tax for widows and orphans, and protected the poor from the usury of the rich.
After that, many governments ruled by special codes of written laws. The oldest such document still known to exist seems to be the Code of Ur-Nammu of Ur (ca 2050 BC). Some of the better-known ancient law codes include the code of Lipit-Ishtar of Isin, the code of Hammurabi of Babylonia, the Hittite code, the Assyrian code and Mosaic law.
In 621 BC, a scribe named Draco codified the cruel oral laws of the city-state of Athens; this code prescribed the death penalty for many offences (nowadays very severe rules are often called "Draconian"). In 594 BC, Solon, the ruler of Athens, created the new Solonian Constitution. It eased the burden of the workers, and determined that membership of the ruling class was to be based on wealth (plutocracy), rather than by birth (aristocracy). Cleisthenes again reformed the Athenian constitution and set it on a democratic footing in 508 BC.
Diagram illustrating the classification of constitutions by Aristotle.
Aristotle (ca 350 BC) was the first to make a formal distinction between ordinary law and constitutional law, establishing ideas of constitution and constitutionalism, and attempting to classify different forms of constitutional government. The most basic definition he used to describe a constitution in general terms was "the arrangement of the offices in a state". In his works Constitution of Athens, Politics, and Nicomachean Ethics he explores different constitutions of his day, including those of Athens, Sparta, and Carthage. He classified both what he regarded as good and what he regarded as bad constitutions, and came to the conclusion that the best constitution was a mixed system, including monarchic, aristocratic, and democratic elements. He also distinguished between citizens, who had the right to participate in the state, and non-citizens and slaves, who did not.
The Romans first codified their constitution in 450 BC as the Twelve Tables. They operated under a series of laws that were added from time to time, but Roman law was never reorganised into a single code until the Codex Theodosianus (AD 438); later, in the Eastern Empire the Codex repetitæ prælectionis (534) was highly influential throughout Europe. This was followed in the east by the Ecloga of Leo III the Isaurian (740) and the Basilica of Basil I (878).
The Edicts of Ashoka established constitutional principles for the 3rd century BC Maurya king's rule in Ancient India. For constitutional principles almost lost to antiquity, see the code of Manu.
Dark ages and early Middle ages
Many of the Germanic people that filled the power vacuum left by the Western Roman Empire in the Early Middle Ages codified their laws. One of the first of these Germanic law codes to be written was the Visigothic Code of Euric (471). This was followed by the Lex Burgundionum, applying separate codes for Germans and for Romans; the Pactus Alamannorum; and the Salic Law of the Franks, all written soon after 500. In 506, the Breviarum or "Lex Romana" of Alaric II, king of the Visigoths, adopted and consolidated the Codex Theodosianus together with assorted earlier Roman laws. Systems that appeared somewhat later include the Edictum Rothari of the Lombards (643), the Lex Visigothorum (654), the Lex Alamannorum (730) and the Lex Frisionum (ca 785). These continental codes were all composed in Latin, while Anglo-Saxon was used for those of England, beginning with the Code of Æthelberht of Kent (602). In ca. 893, Alfred the Great combined this and two other earlier Saxon codes, with various Mosaic and Christian precepts, to produce the Doom book code of laws for England.
Japan's Seventeen-article constitution written in 604, reportedly by Prince Shōtoku, is an early example of a constitution in Asian political history. Influenced by Buddhist teachings, the document focuses more on social morality than institutions of government per se and remains a notable early attempt at a government constitution.
The Constitution of Medina (Arabic: صحیفة المدینه, Ṣaḥīfat al-Madīna), also known as the Charter of Medina, was drafted by the Islamic prophet Muhammad after his flight (hijra) to Yathrib where he became political leader. It constituted a formal agreement between Muhammad and all of the significant tribes and families of Yathrib (later known as Medina), including Muslims, Jews, and pagans.[11][12] The document was drawn up with the explicit concern of bringing to an end the bitter intertribal fighting between the clans of the Aws (Aus) and Khazraj within Medina. To this effect it instituted a number of rights and responsibilities for the Muslim, Jewish, and pagan communities of Medina bringing them within the fold of one community—the Ummah.[13] The precise dating of the Constitution of Medina remains debated but generally scholars agree it was written shortly after the Hijra (622).[14]
In Wales, the Cyfraith Hywel was codified by Hywel Dda c. 942–950.
Middle ages after 1000
The Pravda Yaroslava, originally combined by Yaroslav the Wise the Grand Prince of Kyiv, was granted to Great Novgorod around 1017, and in 1054 was incorporated into the Ruska Pravda, that became the law for all of Kievan Rus. It survived only in later editions of the 15th century.
In England, Henry I's proclamation of the Charter of Liberties in 1100 bound the king for the first time in his treatment of the clergy and the nobility. This idea was extended and refined by the English barony when they forced King John to sign Magna Carta in 1215. The most important single article of the Magna Carta, related to "habeas corpus", provided that the king was not permitted to imprison, outlaw, exile or kill anyone at a whim—there must be due process of law first. This article, Article 39, of the Magna Carta read:
No free man shall be arrested, or imprisoned, or deprived of his property, or outlawed, or exiled, or in any way destroyed, nor shall we go against him or send against him, unless by legal judgement of his peers, or by the law of the land.
This provision became the cornerstone of English liberty after that point. The social contract in the original case was between the king and the nobility, but was gradually extended to all of the people. It led to the system of Constitutional Monarchy, with further reforms shifting the balance of power from the monarchy and nobility to the House of Commons.
The Nomocanon of Saint Sava (Serbian: Законоправило/Zakonopravilo)[15][16][17] was the first Serbian constitution from 1219. This legal act was well developed. St. Sava's Nomocanon was the compilation of Civil law, based on Roman Law and Canon law, based on Ecumenical Councils and its basic purpose was to organize functioning of the young Serbian kingdom and the Serbian church. Saint Sava began the work on the Serbian Nomocanon in 1208 while being at Mount Athos, using The Nomocanon in Fourteen Titles, Synopsis of Stefan the Efesian, Nomocanon of John Scholasticus, Ecumenical Councils' documents, which he modified with the canonical commentaries of Aristinos and Joannes Zonaras, local church meetings, rules of the Holy Fathers, the law of Moses, translation of Prohiron and the Byzantine emperors' Novellae (most were taken from Justinian's Novellae). The Nomocanon was completely new compilation of civil and canonical regulations, taken from the Byzantine sources, but completed and reformed by St. Sava to function properly in Serbia. Beside decrees that organized the life of church, there are various norms regarding civil life, most of them were taken from Prohiron. Legal transplants of Roman-Byzantine law became the basis of the Serbian medieval law. The essence of Zakonopravilo was based on Corpus Iuris Civilis.
Stefan Dušan, Emperor of Serbs and Greeks, enacted Dušan's Code (Serbian: Душанов Законик/Dušanov Zakonik)[18] in Serbia, in two state congresses: in 1349 in Skopje and in 1354 in Serres. It regulated all social spheres, so it was the second Serbian constitution, after St. Sava's Nomocanon (Zakonopravilo). The Code was based on Roman-Byzantine law. The legal transplanting is notable with the articles 171 and 172 of Dušan's Code, which regulated the juridical independence. They were taken from the Byzantine code Basilika (book VII, 1, 16–17).
In 1222, Hungarian King Andrew II issued the Golden Bull of 1222.
Between 1220 and 1230, a Saxon administrator, Eike von Repgow, composed the Sachsenspiegel, which became the supreme law used in parts of Germany as late as 1900.
In 1998, S. Kouyaté reconstructed from oral tradition what he claims is a 14th-century charter of the Mali Empire, called the Kouroukan Fouga.[19]
Around 1240, the Coptic Egyptian Christian writer, 'Abul Fada'il Ibn al-'Assal, wrote the Fetha Negest in Arabic. 'Ibn al-Assal took his laws partly from apostolic writings and Mosaic law, and partly from the former Byzantine codes. There are a few historical records claiming that this law code was translated into Ge'ez and entered Ethiopia around 1450 in the reign of Zara Yaqob. Even so, its first recorded use in the function of a constitution (supreme law of the land) is with Sarsa Dengel beginning in 1563. The Fetha Negest remained the supreme law in Ethiopia until 1931, when a modern-style Constitution was first granted by Emperor Haile Selassie I.
Third volume of the compilation of Catalan Constitutions of 1585
In the Principality of Catalonia, the Catalan constitutions were promulgated by the Court from 1283 (or even two centuries before, if we consider the Usatges of Barcelona as part of the compilation of Constitutions) until 1716, when Philip V of Spain gave the Nueva Planta decrees, finishing with the historical laws of Catalonia. These Constitutions were usually made formally as a royal initiative, but required for its approval or repeal the favorable vote of the Catalan Courts, the medieval antecedent of the modern Parliaments. These laws had, as the other modern constitutions, preeminence over other laws, and they could not be contradicted by mere decrees or edicts of the king.
The Golden Bull of 1356 was a decree issued by a Reichstag in Nuremberg headed by Emperor Charles IV that fixed, for a period of more than four hundred years, an important aspect of the constitutional structure of the Holy Roman Empire.
In China, the Hongwu Emperor created and refined a document he called Ancestral Injunctions (first published in 1375, revised twice more before his death in 1398). These rules served in a very real sense as a constitution for the Ming Dynasty for the next 250 years.
The oldest written document still governing a sovereign nation today[20] is that of San Marino. The Leges Statutae Republicae Sancti Marini was written in Latin and consists of six books. The first book, with 62 articles, establishes councils, courts, various executive officers and the powers assigned to them. The remaining books cover criminal and civil law, judicial procedures and remedies. Written in 1600, the document was based upon the Statuti Comunali (Town Statute) of 1300, itself influenced by the Codex Justinianus, and it remains in force today.
In 1392 the Carta de Logu was legal code of the Giudicato of Arborea promulgated by the giudicessa Eleanor. It was in force in Sardinia until it was superseded by the code of Charles Felix in April 1827. The Carta was a work of great importance in Sardinian history. It was an organic, coherent, and systematic work of legislation encompassing the civil and penal law.
Iroquois "Great Law of Peace"
Main article: Great Law of Peace
The Gayanashagowa, the oral constitution of the Iroquois nation also known as the Great Law of Peace, established a system of governance in which sachems (tribal chiefs) of the members of the Iroquois League made decisions on the basis of universal consensus of all chiefs following discussions that were initiated by a single tribe. The position of sachem descended through families, and were allocated by senior female relatives.[21]
Historians including Donald Grinde,[22] Bruce Johansen[23] and others[24] believe that the Iroquois constitution provided inspiration for the United States Constitution and in 1988 was recognised by a resolution in Congress.[25] The thesis is not considered credible by some scholars.[21][26] Stanford University historian Jack N. Rakove stated that "The voluminous records we have for the constitutional debates of the late 1780s contain no significant references to the Iroquois" and stated that there are ample European precedents to the democratic institutions of the United States.[27] Francis Jennings noted that the statement made by Benjamin Franklin frequently quoted by proponents of the thesis does not support this idea as it is advocating for a union against these "ignorant savages" and called the idea "absurd".[28] Bruce Johansen contends Jennings, Tooker etc. have "humorlessly missed the ironic nature of Franklin's statement"[29] and persist in "ignoring the relevant sources".[30] Anthropologist Dean Snow stated that though Franklin's Albany Plan may have drawn some inspiration from the Iroquois League, there is little evidence that either the Plan or the Constitution drew substantially from this source and argues that "...such claims muddle and denigrate the subtle and remarkable features of Iroquois government. The two forms of government are distinctive and individually remarkable in conception."[31]
Modern constitutions
The Cossack Constitution of Pylyp Orlyk, 1710.
A painting depicting George Washington at the Constitutional Convention of 1787 signing of the U.S. Constitution
In 1639, the Colony of Connecticut adopted the Fundamental Orders, which was the first North American constitution, and is the basis for every new Connecticut constitution since, and is also the reason for Connecticut's nickname, "the Constitution State".
The English Protectorate that was set up by Oliver Cromwell after the English Civil War promulgated the first detailed written constitution adopted by a modern state;[32] it was called the Instrument of Government. This formed the basis of government for the short lived republic from 1653 to 1657 by providing a legal rationale for the increasing power of Cromwell, after Parliament consistently failed to govern effectively. Most of the concepts and ideas embedded into modern constitutional theory, especially bicameralism, separation of powers, the written constitution, and judicial review, can be traced back to the experiments of that period. [33]
Drafted by Major-General John Lambert in 1653, the Instrument of Government included elements incorporated from an earlier document "Heads of Proposals",[34][35] which had been agreed to by the Army Council in 1647, as a set of propositions intended to be a basis for a constitutional settlement after King Charles I was defeated in the First English Civil War. Charles had rejected the propositions, but before the start of the Second Civil War, the Grandees of the New Model Army had presented the Heads of Proposals as their alternative to the more radical Agreement of the People presented by the Agitators and their civilian supporters at the Putney Debates.
On January 4, 1649 the Rump Parliament declared "that the people are, under God, the original of all just power; that the Commons of England, being chosen by and representing the people, have the supreme power in this nation".[36]
The Instrument of Government was adopted by Parliament on December 15, 1653 and Oliver Cromwell was installed as Lord Protector on the following day. The constitution set up a state council consisting of 21 members while executive authority was vested in the office of "Lord Protector of the Commonwealth"; this position was designated as a non-hereditary life appointment. It also required the calling of triennial Parliaments, with each sitting for at least five months.
The Instrument of Government was replaced in May 1657 by England's second, and last, codified constitution, the Humble Petition and Advice, proposed by Sir Christopher Packe.[37] The Petition offered hereditary monarchy to Oliver Cromwell, asserted Parliament's control over issuing new taxation, provided an independent council to advise the king and safeguarded 'Triennial' meetings of Parliament. A modified version of the Humble Petition with the clause on kingship removed was ratified on 25 May. This finally met its demise in conjunction with the death of Cromwell and the Restoration of the monarchy.
Other examples of European constitutions of this era were the Corsican Constitution of 1755 and the Swedish Constitution of 1772.
All of the British colonies in North America that were to become the 13 original United States, adopted their own constitutions in 1776 and 1777, during the American Revolution (and before the later Articles of Confederation and United States Constitution), with the exceptions of Massachusetts, Connecticut and Rhode Island. The Commonwealth of Massachusetts adopted its Constitution in 1780, the oldest still-functioning constitution of any U.S. state; while Connecticut and Rhode Island officially continued to operate under their old colonial charters, until they adopted their first state constitutions in 1818 and 1843, respectively.
Democratic constitutions
Constitution of May 3, 1791 (painting by Jan Matejko, 1891). Polish King Stanisław August (left, in regal ermine-trimmed cloak), enters St. John's Cathedral, where Sejm deputies will swear to uphold the new Constitution; in background, Warsaw's Royal Castle, where the Constitution has just been adopted.
What is sometimes called the "enlightened constitution" model was developed by philosophers of the Age of Enlightenment such as Thomas Hobbes, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, and John Locke. The model proposed that constitutional governments should be stable, adaptable, accountable, open and should represent the people (i.e., support democracy).[38]
Agreements and Constitutions of Laws and Freedoms of the Zaporizian Host was written in 1710 by Pylyp Orlyk, hetman of the Zaporozhian Host. It was written to establish a free Zaporozhian-Ukrainian Republic, with the support of Charles XII of Sweden. It is notable in that it established a democratic standard for the separation of powers in government between the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches, well before the publication of Montesquieu's Spirit of the Laws. This Constitution also limited the executive authority of the hetman, and established a democratically elected Cossack parliament called the General Council. However, Orlyk's project for an independent Ukrainian State never materialized, and his constitution, written in exile, never went into effect.
Corsican Constitutions of 1755 and 1794 were inspired by Jean-Jacques Rousseau. The later one introduced universal suffrage for property owners.
The United States Constitution, ratified June 21, 1788, was influenced by the writings of Polybius, Locke, Montesquieu, and others. The document became a benchmark for republicanism and codified constitutions written thereafter.[citation needed]
The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth Constitution was passed on May 3, 1791.[39][40][41] Another landmark document was the French Constitution, ratified on September 3, 1791.
On March 19, the Spanish Constitution of 1812 was ratified by a parliament gathered in Cadiz, the only Spanish continental city which was safe from French occupation. The Spanish Constitution served as a model for other liberal constitutions of several South-European and Latin American nations like, for example, Portuguese Constitution of 1822, constitutions of various Italian states during Carbonari revolts (i.e., in the Kingdom of the Two Sicilies), the Norwegian constitution of 1814, or the Mexican Constitution of 1824.[42]
In Brazil, the Constitution of 1824 expressed the option for the monarchy as political system after Brazilian Independence. The leader of the national emancipation process was the Portuguese prince Pedro I, elder son of the king of Portugal. Pedro was crowned in 1822 as first emperor of Brazil. The country was ruled by Constitutional monarchy until 1889, when finally adopted the Republican model.
In Denmark, as a result of the Napoleonic Wars, the absolute monarchy lost its personal possession of Norway to another absolute monarchy, Sweden. However the Norwegians managed to infuse a radically democratic and liberal constitution in 1814, adopting many facets from the American constitution and the revolutionary French ones; but maintaining a hereditary monarch limited by the constitution, like the Spanish one.
The first Swiss Federal Constitution was put in force in September 1848 (with official revisions in 1878, 1891, 1949, 1971, 1982 and 1999).
The Serbian revolution initially led to a proclamation of a proto-constitution in 1811; the full-fledged Constitution of Serbia followed few decades later, in 1835. The first Serbian constitution (Sretenjski ustav) was adopted at the national assembly in Kragujevac on February 15, 1835.
The Constitution of Canada came into force on July 1, 1867 as the British North America Act, an act of the British Parliament. Over a century later, the BNA Act was patriated to the Canadian Parliament and augmented with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.[43] Apart from the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982, Canada's constitution also has unwritten elements based in common law and convention.[44][45]
Principles of constitutional design
After tribal people first began to live in cities and establish nations, many of these functioned according to unwritten customs, while some developed autocratic, even tyrannical monarchs, who ruled by decree, or mere personal whim. Such rule led some thinkers to take the position that what mattered was not the design of governmental institutions and operations, as much as the character of the rulers. This view can be seen in Plato, who called for rule by "philosopher-kings."[46] Later writers, such as Aristotle, Cicero and Plutarch, would examine designs for government from a legal and historical standpoint.
The Renaissance brought a series of political philosophers who wrote implied criticisms of the practices of monarchs and sought to identify principles of constitutional design that would be likely to yield more effective and just governance from their viewpoints. This began with revival of the Roman law of nations concept[47] and its application to the relations among nations, and they sought to establish customary "laws of war and peace"[48] to ameliorate wars and make them less likely. This led to considerations of what authority monarchs or other officials have and don't have, from where that authority derives, and the remedies for the abuse of such authority.[49]
A seminal juncture in this line of discourse arose in England from the Civil War, the Cromwellian Protectorate, the writings of Thomas Hobbes, Samuel Rutherford, the Levellers, John Milton, and James Harrington, leading to the debate between Robert Filmer, arguing for the divine right of monarchs, on the one side, and on the other, Henry Neville, James Tyrrell, Algernon Sidney, and John Locke. What arose from the latter was a concept of government being erected on the foundations of first, a state of nature governed by natural laws, then a state of society, established by a social contract or compact, which bring underlying natural or social laws, before governments are formally established on them as foundations.
Along the way several writers examined how the design of government was important, even if the government were headed by a monarch. They also classified various historical examples of governmental designs, typically into democracies, aristocracies, or monarchies, and considered how just and effective each tended to be and why, and how the advantages of each might be obtained by combining elements of each into a more complex design that balanced competing tendencies. Some, such as Montesquieu, also examined how the functions of government, such as legislative, executive, and judicial, might appropriately be separated into branches. The prevailing theme among these writers was that the design of constitutions is not completely arbitrary or a matter of taste. They generally held that there are underlying principles of design that constrain all constitutions for every polity or organization. Each built on the ideas of those before concerning what those principles might be.
The later writings of Orestes Brownson[50] would try to explain what constitutional designers were trying to do. According to Brownson there are, in a sense, three "constitutions" involved: The first the constitution of nature that includes all of what was called "natural law." The second is the constitution of society, an unwritten and commonly understood set of rules for the society formed by a social contract before it establishes a government, by which it establishes the third, a constitution of government. The second would include such elements as the making of decisions by public conventions called by public notice and conducted by established rules of procedure. Each constitution must be consistent with, and derive its authority from, the ones before it, as well as from a historical act of society formation or constitutional ratification. Brownson argued that a state is a society with effective dominion over a well-defined territory, that consent to a well-designed constitution of government arises from presence on that territory, and that it is possible for provisions of a written constitution of government to be "unconstitutional" if they are inconsistent with the constitutions of nature or society. Brownson argued that it is not ratification alone that makes a written constitution of government legitimate, but that it must also be competently designed and applied.
Other writers[51] have argued that such considerations apply not only to all national constitutions of government, but also to the constitutions of private organizations, that it is not an accident that the constitutions that tend to satisfy their members contain certain elements, as a minimum, or that their provisions tend to become very similar as they are amended after experience with their use. Provisions that give rise to certain kinds of questions are seen to need additional provisions for how to resolve those questions, and provisions that offer no course of action may best be omitted and left to policy decisions. Provisions that conflict with what Brownson and others can discern are the underlying "constitutions" of nature and society tend to be difficult or impossible to execute, or to lead to unresolvable disputes.
Constitutional design has been treated as a kind of metagame in which play consists of finding the best design and provisions for a written constitution that will be the rules for the game of government, and that will be most likely to optimize a balance of the utilities of justice, liberty, and security. An example is the metagame Nomic.[52]
Political economy theory regards constitutions as coordination devices that help citizens to prevent rulers from abusing power. If the citizenry can coordinate a response to police government officials in the face of a constitutional fault, then the government have the incentives to honor the rights that the constitution guarantees.[53] An alternative view considers that constitutions are not enforced by the citizens at-large, but rather by the administrative powers of the state. Because rulers cannot themselves implement their policies, they need to rely on a set of organizations (armies, courts, police agencies, tax collectors) to implement it. In this position, they can directly sanction the government by refusing to cooperate, disabling the authority of the rulers. Therefore, constitutions could be characterized by a self-enforcing equilibria between the rulers and powerful administrators.[54]
Governmental constitutions
This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (September 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (September 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Presidential copy of the Russian Constitution.
Most commonly, the term constitution refers to a set of rules and principles that define the nature and extent of government. Most constitutions seek to regulate the relationship between institutions of the state, in a basic sense the relationship between the executive, legislature and the judiciary, but also the relationship of institutions within those branches. For example, executive branches can be divided into a head of government, government departments/ministries, executive agencies and a civil service/administration. Most constitutions also attempt to define the relationship between individuals and the state, and to establish the broad rights of individual citizens. It is thus the most basic law of a territory from which all the other laws and rules are hierarchically derived; in some territories it is in fact called "Basic Law".
Key features
The following are features of democratic constitutions that have been identified by political scientists to exist, in one form or another, in virtually all national constitutions.
Classification
Type
Form
Example
Codified in single act (document) Most of the world constitutions.
Uncodified fully written (in few documents) San Marino, Israel, Saudi Arabia
Uncodified partially unwritten (see constitutional convention) Canada, NZ, UK
Codification
A fundamental classification is codification or lack of codification. A codified constitution is one that is contained in a single document, which is the single source of constitutional law in a state. An uncodified constitution is one that is not contained in a single document, consisting of several different sources, which may be written or unwritten; see constitutional convention.
Codified constitution
Most states in the world have codified constitutions.
Codified constitutions are often the product of some dramatic political change, such as a revolution. The process by which a country adopts a constitution is closely tied to the historical and political context driving this fundamental change. The legitimacy (and often the longevity) of codified constitutions has often been tied to the process by which they are initially adopted and some scholars have pointed out that high constitutional turnover within a given country may itself be detrimental to separation of powers and the rule of law.
States that have codified constitutions normally give the constitution supremacy over ordinary statute law. That is, if there is any conflict between a legal statute and the codified constitution, all or part of the statute can be declared ultra vires by a court, and struck down as unconstitutional. In addition, exceptional procedures are often required to amend a constitution. These procedures may include: convocation of a special constituent assembly or constitutional convention, requiring a supermajority of legislators' votes, the consent of regional legislatures, a referendum process, and/or other procedures that make amending a constitution more difficult than passing a simple law.
Constitutions may also provide that their most basic principles can never be abolished, even by amendment. In case a formally valid amendment of a constitution infringes these principles protected against any amendment, it may constitute a so-called unconstitutional constitutional law.
Codified constitutions normally consist of a ceremonial preamble, which sets forth the goals of the state and the motivation for the constitution, and several articles containing the substantive provisions. The preamble, which is omitted in some constitutions, may contain a reference to God and/or to fundamental values of the state such as liberty, democracy or human rights. In ethnic nation-states such as Estonia, the mission of the state can be defined as preserving a specific nation, language and culture.
Uncodified constitution
Main article: Uncodified constitution
Magna Carta
As of 2017[update] only two sovereign states, New Zealand and the United Kingdom, have uncodified constitutions. The Basic Laws of Israel have since 1950 been intended to be the basis for a constitution, but as of 2017 it had not been drafted. The various Laws are considered to have precedence over other laws, and give the procedure by which they can be amended, typically by a simple majority of members of the Knesset (parliament).[55]
Uncodified constitutions are the product of an "evolution" of laws and conventions over centuries. By contrast to codified constitutions (in the Westminster System that originated in England), uncodified constitutions include written sources: e.g. constitutional statutes enacted by the Parliament and also unwritten sources: constitutional conventions, observation of precedents, royal prerogatives, custom and tradition, such as always holding the General Election on Thursdays; together these constitute the British constitutional law.
Written versus unwritten; codified versus uncodified
Some constitutions are largely, but not wholly, codified. For example, in the Constitution of Australia, most of its fundamental political principles and regulations concerning the relationship between branches of government, and concerning the government and the individual are codified in a single document, the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Australia. However, the presence of statutes with constitutional significance, namely the Statute of Westminster, as adopted by the Commonwealth in the Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942, and the Australia Act 1986 means that Australia's constitution is not contained in a single constitutional document. It means the Constitution of Australia is uncodified, it also contains constitutional conventions, thus is partially unwritten.
The Constitution of Canada, which evolved from the British North America Acts until severed from nominal British control by the Canada Act 1982 (analogous to the Australia Act 1986), is a similar example. Canada's constitution consists of almost 30 different statutes.
The terms written constitution and codified constitution are often used interchangeably, as are unwritten constitution and uncodified constitution, although this usage is technically inaccurate. A codified constitution is a single document; states that do not have such a document have uncodified, but not entirely unwritten, constitutions, since much of an uncodified constitution is usually written in laws such as the Basic Laws of Israel and the Parliament Acts of the United Kingdom. Uncodified constitutions largely lack protection against amendment by the government of the time. For example, the UK Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 legislated by simple majority for strictly fixed-term parliaments; until then the ruling party could call a general election at any convenient time up to the maximum term of five years. This change would require a constitutional amendment in most nations.
Entrenchment
This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (December 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
United States Constitution
Further information: Fundamental Laws of England
The presence or lack of entrenchment is a fundamental feature of constitutions. An entrenched constitution cannot be altered in any way by a legislature as part of its normal business concerning ordinary statutory laws, but can only be amended by a different and more onerous procedure. There may be a requirement for a special body to be set up, or the proportion of favourable votes of members of existing legislative bodies may be required to be higher to pass a constitutional amendment than for statutes. The entrenched clauses of a constitution can create different degrees of entrenchment, ranging from simply excluding constitutional amendment from the normal business of a legislature, to making certain amendments either more difficult than normal modifications, or forbidden under any circumstances.
Entrenchment is an inherent feature in most codified constitutions. A codified constitution will incorporate the rules which must be followed for the constitution itself to be changed.
The US constitution is an example of an entrenched constitution, and the UK constitution is an example of a constitution that is not entrenched (or codified). In some states the text of the constitution may be changed; in others the original text is not changed, and amendments are passed which add to and may override the original text and earlier amendments.
Procedures for constitutional amendment vary between states. In a nation with a federal system of government the approval of a majority of state or provincial legislatures may be required. Alternatively, a national referendum may be required. Details are to be found in the articles on the constitutions of the various nations and federal states in the world.
In constitutions that are not entrenched, no special procedure is required for modification. Lack of entrenchment is a characteristic of uncodified constitutions; the constitution is not recognised with any higher legal status than ordinary statutes. In the UK, for example laws which modify written or unwritten provisions of the constitution are passed on a simple majority in Parliament. No special "constitutional amendment" procedure is required. The principle of parliamentary sovereignty holds that no sovereign parliament may be bound by the acts of its predecessors;[56] and there is no higher authority that can create law which binds Parliament. The sovereign is nominally the head of state with important powers, such as the power to declare war; the uncodified and unwritten constitution removes all these powers in practice.
In practice democratic governments do not use the lack of entrenchment of the constitution to impose the will of the government or abolish all civil rights, as they could in theory do, but the distinction between constitutional and other law is still somewhat arbitrary, usually following historical principles embodied in important past legislation. For example, several British Acts of Parliament such as the Bill of Rights, Human Rights Act and, prior to the creation of Parliament, Magna Carta are regarded as granting fundamental rights and principles which are treated as almost constitutional. Several rights that in another state might be guaranteed by constitution have indeed been abolished or modified by the British parliament in the early 21st century, including[citation needed] the unconditional right to trial by jury, the right to silence without prejudicial inference, permissible detention before a charge is made extended from 24 hours to 42 days, and the right not to be tried twice for the same offence.
Absolutely unmodifiable articles
The strongest level of entrenchment exists in those constitutions that state that some of their most fundamental principles are absolute, i.e. certain articles may not be amended under any circumstances. An amendment of a constitution that is made consistently with that constitution, except that it violates the absolute non-modifiability, can be called an unconstitutional constitutional law. Ultimately it is always possible for a constitution to be overthrown by internal or external force, for example, a revolution (perhaps claiming to be justified by the right to revolution) or invasion. In the Constitution of India, the Supreme Court has created the Doctrine of Basic Structure in Kesavananda Bharti's case (1973) stating that the essential features of the Basic structure cannot be amended by the Parliament. The Court has identified judicial review, independence of Judiciary, free and fair election, core of Fundamental Rights as a few of the essential features which are unamendable. However, the Supreme Court did not identify specific provisions which are in the category of absolute entrenchment. A critical analysis of the Doctrine of Basic Structure appears in Professor M.K. Bhandari's book Basic Structure of Indian Constitution - A Critical Reconsideration.
An example of absolute unmodifiability is found in the German constitution. Articles 1 and 20 protect human dignity, human rights, democracy, rule of law, federal and social state principles, and the people's right of resistance as a last resort against an attempt to abolish the constitutional order. Article 79, Section 3 states that these principles cannot be changed, even according to the methods of amendment defined elsewhere in the document, until a new constitution comes into effect.
Another example is the Constitution of Honduras, which has an article stating that the article itself and certain other articles cannot be changed in any circumstances. Article 374 of the Honduras Constitution asserts this unmodifiability, stating, "It is not possible to reform, in any case, the preceding article, the present article, the constitutional articles referring to the form of government, to the national territory, to the presidential period, the prohibition to serve again as President of the Republic, the citizen who has performed under any title in consequence of which she/he cannot be President of the Republic in the subsequent period."[57] This unmodifiability article played an important role in the 2009 Honduran constitutional crisis.
Distribution of sovereignty
See also: Federalism
Constitutions also establish where sovereignty is located in the state. There are three basic types of distribution of sovereignty according to the degree of centralisation of power: unitary, federal, and confederal. The distinction is not absolute.
In a unitary state, sovereignty resides in the state itself, and the constitution determines this. The territory of the state may be divided into regions, but they are not sovereign and are subordinate to the state. In the UK, the constitutional doctrine of Parliamentary sovereignty dictates than sovereignty is ultimately contained at the centre. Some powers have been devolved to Northern Ireland, Scotland, and Wales (but not England). Some unitary states (Spain is an example) devolve more and more power to sub-national governments until the state functions in practice much like a federal state.
A federal state has a central structure with at most a small amount of territory mainly containing the institutions of the federal government, and several regions (called states, provinces, etc.) which compose the territory of the whole state. Sovereignty is divided between the centre and the constituent regions. The constitutions of Canada and the United States establish federal states, with power divided between the federal government and the provinces or states. Each of the regions may in turn have its own constitution (of unitary nature).
A confederal state comprises again several regions, but the central structure has only limited coordinating power, and sovereignty is located in the regions. Confederal constitutions are rare, and there is often dispute to whether so-called "confederal" states are actually federal.
To some extent a group of states which do not constitute a federation as such may by treaties and accords give up parts of their sovereignty to a supranational entity. For example, the countries constituting the European Union have agreed to abide by some Union-wide measures which restrict their absolute sovereignty in some ways, e.g., the use of the metric system of measurement instead of national units previously used.
Separation of powers
Main article: Separation of powers
Constitutions usually explicitly divide power between various branches of government. The standard model, described by the Baron de Montesquieu, involves three branches of government: executive, legislative and judicial. Some constitutions include additional branches, such as an auditory branch. Constitutions vary extensively as to the degree of separation of powers between these branches.
Lines of accountability
In presidential and semi-presidential systems of government, department secretaries/ministers are accountable to the president, who has patronage powers to appoint and dismiss ministers. The president is accountable to the people in an election.
In parliamentary systems, Cabinet Ministers are accountable to Parliament, but it is the prime minister who appoints and dismisses them. In the case of the United Kingdom and other countries with a monarchy, it is the monarch who appoints and dismisses ministers, on the advice of the prime minister. In turn the prime minister will resign if the government loses the confidence of the parliament (or a part of it). Confidence can be lost if the government loses a vote of no confidence or, depending on the country,[58] loses a particularly important vote in parliament, such as vote on the budget. When a government loses confidence, it stays in office until a new government is formed; something which normally but not necessarily required the holding of a general election.
State of emergency
Main article: State of emergency
Many constitutions allow the declaration under exceptional circumstances of some form of state of emergency during which some rights and guarantees are suspended. This provision can be and has been abused to allow a government to suppress dissent without regard for human rights—see the article on state of emergency.
Facade constitutions
See also: Constitutionalism
Italian political theorist Giovanni Sartori noted the existence of national constitutions which are a facade for authoritarian sources of power. While such documents may express respect for human rights or establish an independent judiciary, they may be ignored when the government feels threatened, or never put into practice. An extreme example was the Constitution of the Soviet Union that on paper supported freedom of assembly and freedom of speech; however, citizens who transgressed unwritten limits were summarily imprisoned. The example demonstrates that the protections and benefits of a constitution are ultimately provided not through its written terms but through deference by government and society to its principles. A constitution may change from being real to a facade and back again as democratic and autocratic governments succeed each other.
Constitutional courts
Further information: Constitutional court and Constitutionality
Constitutions are often, but by no means always, protected by a legal body whose job it is to interpret those constitutions and, where applicable, declare void executive and legislative acts which infringe the constitution. In some countries, such as Germany, this function is carried out by a dedicated constitutional court which performs this (and only this) function. In other countries, such as Ireland, the ordinary courts may perform this function in addition to their other responsibilities. While elsewhere, like in the United Kingdom, the concept of declaring an act to be unconstitutional does not exist.
A constitutional violation is an action or legislative act that is judged by a constitutional court to be contrary to the constitution, that is, unconstitutional. An example of constitutional violation by the executive could be a public office holder who acts outside the powers granted to that office by a constitution. An example of constitutional violation by the legislature is an attempt to pass a law that would contradict the constitution, without first going through the proper constitutional amendment process.
Some countries, mainly those with uncodified constitutions, have no such courts at all. For example, the United Kingdom has traditionally operated under the principle of parliamentary sovereignty under which the laws passed by United Kingdom Parliament could not be questioned by the courts.
See also
Basic law, equivalent in some countries, often for a temporary constitution
Apostolic constitution (a class of Catholic Church documents)
Constitution of the Roman Republic
Constitutional court
Constitutional crisis
Constitutional economics
Constitutionalism
Corporate constitutional documents
Judicial activism
Judicial restraint
Judicial review
Philosophy of law
Rule of law
Rule according to higher law
Judicial philosophies of constitutional interpretation (note: generally specific to United States constitutional law)
List of national constitutions
Originalism
Strict constructionism
Textualism
Proposed European Union constitution
Treaty of Lisbon (adopts same changes, but without constitutional name)
United Nations Charter
References
Jump up ^ The New Oxford American Dictionary, Second Edn., Erin McKean (editor), 2051 pages, May 2005, Oxford University Press, ISBN 0-19-517077-6.
Jump up ^ R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3, [207]
Jump up ^ Pylee, M.V. (1997). India's Constitution. S. Chand & Co. p. 3. ISBN 81-219-0403-X.
Jump up ^ Sarkar, Siuli. Public Administration In India. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. p. 363. ISBN 978-81-203-3979-8.
Jump up ^ Kashyap, Subhash. Our Constitution-An introduction to India's Constitution and Constitution Law. National Book Trust, India. p. 3. ISBN 978-81-237-0734-1.
^ Jump up to: a b "Constitution Rankings - Comparative Constitutions Project". Comparative Constitutions Project. Retrieved 2016-06-05.
Jump up ^ "Constitution of India". Ministry of Law and Justice of India. July 2008. Archived from the original on February 23, 2015. Retrieved December 17, 2008.
Jump up ^ "Constitute". www.constituteproject.org. Retrieved 2016-06-05.
Jump up ^ The historical and institutional context of Roman law, George Mousourakis, 2003, p. 243
Jump up ^ Gordon, Scott (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Harvard University Press. p. 4. ISBN 0-674-16987-5.
Jump up ^ See:
Reuven Firestone, Jihād: the origin of holy war in Islam (1999) p. 118;
"Muhammad", Encyclopedia of Islam Online
Jump up ^ Watt. Muhammad at Medina and R. B. Serjeant "The Constitution of Medina." Islamic Quarterly 8 (1964) p.4.
Jump up ^ R. B. Serjeant, The Sunnah Jami'ah, pacts with the Yathrib Jews, and the Tahrim of Yathrib: Analysis and translation of the documents comprised in the so-called "Constitution of Medina." Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London, Vol. 41, No. 1. (1978), page 4.
Jump up ^ Watt. Muhammad at Medina. pp. 227–228 Watt argues that the initial agreement was shortly after the hijra and the document was amended at a later date specifically after the battle of Badr (AH [anno hijra] 2, = AD 624). Serjeant argues that the constitution is in fact 8 different treaties which can be dated according to events as they transpired in Medina with the first treaty being written shortly after Muhammad's arrival. R. B. Serjeant. "The Sunnah Jâmi'ah, Pacts with the Yathrib Jews, and the Tahrîm of Yathrib: Analysis and Translation of the Documents Comprised in the so called 'Constitution of Medina'." in The Life of Muhammad: The Formation of the Classical Islamic World: Volume iv. Ed. Uri Rubin. Brookfield: Ashgate, 1998, p. 151 and see same article in BSOAS 41 (1978): 18 ff. See also Caetani. Annali dell'Islam, Volume I. Milano: Hoepli, 1905, p. 393. Julius Wellhausen. Skizzen und Vorabeiten, IV, Berlin: Reimer, 1889, p 82f who argue that the document is a single treaty agreed upon shortly after the hijra. Wellhausen argues that it belongs to the first year of Muhammad's residence in Medina, before the battle of Badr in 2/624. Wellhausen bases this judgement on three considerations; first Muhammad is very diffident about his own position, he accepts the Pagan tribes within the Umma, and maintains the Jewish clans as clients of the Ansars see Wellhausen, Excursus, p. 158. Even Moshe Gil a skeptic of Islamic history argues that it was written within 5 months of Muhammad's arrival in Medina. Moshe Gil. "The Constitution of Medina: A Reconsideration." Israel Oriental Studies 4 (1974): p. 45.
Jump up ^ The Late Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Late Twelfth Century ... - John V. A. Fine, John Van Antwerp Fine - Google Böcker. Google Books. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
Jump up ^ Metasearch Search Engine. Search.com. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
Jump up ^ [1] Archived November 25, 2011, at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Dusanov Zakonik Archived August 3, 2010, at the Wayback Machine.. Dusanov Zakonik. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
Jump up ^ Mangoné Naing, SAH/D(2006)563 The KURUKAN FUGA Charter: An example of an Endogenous Governance Mechanism for Conflict Prevention, Inter-generational Forum on Endogenous Governance in West Africa organised by Sahel and West Africa Club / OECD, Ouagadougou (Burkina Faso), June 26 to 28, 2006. pp. 71–82.
Jump up ^ "The United States has "the longest surviving constitution."". PolitiFact.com. Retrieved November 10, 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b Tooker E (1990). "The United States Constitution and the Iroquois League". In Clifton JA. The Invented Indian: cultural fictions and government policies. New Brunswick, N.J., U.S.A: Transaction Publishers. pp. 107–128. ISBN 1-56000-745-1.
Jump up ^ Grinde, D (1992). "Iroquois political theory and the roots of American democracy". In Lyons O. Exiled in the land of the free: democracy, Indian nations, and the U.S. Constitution. Santa Fe, N.M: Clear Light Publishers. ISBN 0-940666-15-4.
Jump up ^ Bruce E. Johansen; Donald A. Grinde, Jr. (1991). Exemplar of liberty: native America and the evolution of democracy. [Los Angeles]: American Indian Studies Center, University of California, Los Angeles. ISBN 0-935626-35-2. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Armstrong, VI (1971). I Have Spoken: American History Through the Voices of the Indians. Swallow Press. p. 14. ISBN 0-8040-0530-3.
Jump up ^ "H. Con. Res. 331, October 21, 1988" (PDF). United States Senate. Retrieved November 23, 2008.
Jump up ^ Shannon, TJ (2000). Indians and Colonists at the Crossroads of Empire: The Albany Congress of 1754. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. pp. 6–8. ISBN 0-8014-8818-4.
Jump up ^ Rakove, J (November 7, 2005). "Did the Founding Fathers Really Get Many of Their Ideas of Liberty from the Iroquois?". George Mason University. Retrieved January 5, 2011.
Jump up ^ Jennings F (1988). Empire of fortune: crown, colonies, and tribes in the Seven Years War in America. New York: Norton. pp. 259n15. ISBN 0-393-30640-2.
Jump up ^ Franklin's statement reads "It would be a strange thing if Six Nations of ignorant savages should be capable of forming a scheme for such an union, and be able to execute it in such a manner as that it has subsisted ages and appears indissoluble; and yet that a like union should be impracticable for ten or a dozen English colonies, to whom it is more necessary and must be more advantageous, and who cannot be supposed to want an equal understanding of their interests." Benjamin Franklin on the Iroquois League, in a letter to James Parker, 1751
Jump up ^ Bruce E. Johansen; Donald A. Grinde, Jr. (1998). "Expanding the scope of "Permissible Debate"". Debating Democracy: Native American Legacy of Freedom. [Santa Fe]: Clear Light Publishers, Santa Fe, New Mexico. ISBN 0-940666-79-0. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Snow DR (1996). The Iroquois (The Peoples of America Series). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers. pp. 154. ISBN 1-55786-938-3.
Jump up ^ Instrument of Government (England [1653]) - Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
Jump up ^ Francis D. Wormuth (1949). THE ORIGINS OF MODERN CONSTITUTIONALISM. HARPER & BROTHERS.
Jump up ^ Tyacke p. 69
Jump up ^ Farr pp. 80,81. See Declaration of Representation of June 14, 1647
Jump up ^ Fritze, Ronald H. & Robison, William B. (1996). Historical dictionary of Stuart England, 1603–1689, Greenwood Publishing Group, ISBN 0-313-28391-5 p. 228
Jump up ^ Lee, Sidney (1903), Dictionary of National Biography Index and Epitome p. 991.
Jump up ^ constitution (politics and law) - Encyclopædia Britannica. Encyclopædia Britannica. Retrieved July 12, 2013.
Jump up ^ Blaustein, Albert (January 1993). Constitutions of the World. Fred B. Rothman & Company. ISBN 978-0-8377-0362-6.
Jump up ^ Isaac Kramnick, Introduction, Madison, James (November 1987). The Federalist Papers. Penguin Classics. ISBN 0-14-044495-5.
Jump up ^ "The first European country to follow the U.S. example was Poland in 1791." John Markoff, Waves of Democracy, 1996, ISBN 0-8039-9019-7, p. 121.
Jump up ^ Payne, Stanley G. (1973). A History of Spain and Portugal: Eighteenth Century to Franco. 2. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. pp. 432–433. ISBN 978-0-299-06270-5. The Spanish pattern of conspiracy and revolt by liberal army officers ... was emulated in both Portugal and Italy. In the wake of Riego's successful rebellion, the first and only pronunciamiento in Italian history was carried out by liberal officers in the kingdom of the Two Sicilies. The Spanish-style military conspiracy also helped to inspire the beginning of the Russian revolutionary movement with the revolt of the Decembrist army officers in 1825. Italian liberalism in 1820–1821 relied on junior officers and the provincial middle classes, essentially the same social base as in Spain. It even used a Hispanized political vocabulary, for it was led by giunte (juntas), appointed local capi politici (jefes políticos), used the terms of liberali and servili (emulating the Spanish word serviles applied to supporters of absolutism), and in the end talked of resisting by means of a guerrilla. For both Portuguese and Italian liberals of these years, the Spanish constitution of 1812 remained the standard document of reference.
Jump up ^ Constitution Act, 1982, s. 60
Jump up ^ The Constitutional Law Group, Canadian Constitutional Law. 3rd ed. Toronto: Emond Montgomery Publications Ltd., 2003, p. 5
Jump up ^ Saul, John Ralston. The Doubter's Companion: A Dictionary of Aggressive Common Sense. Toronto: Penguin, 1995.
Jump up ^ Aristotle, by Francesco Hayez
Jump up ^ Relectiones, Franciscus de Victoria (lect. 1532, first pub. 1557).
Jump up ^ The Law of War and Peace, Hugo Grotius (1625)
Jump up ^ Vindiciae Contra Tyrannos (Defense of Liberty Against Tyrants), "Junius Brutus" (Orig. Fr. 1581, Eng. tr. 1622, 1688)
Jump up ^ The American Republic: its Constitution, Tendencies, and Destiny, O. A. Brownson (1866)
Jump up ^ Principles of Constitutional Design, Donald S. Lutz (2006) ISBN 0-521-86168-3
Jump up ^ The Paradox of Self-Amendment, byPeter Suber (1990) ISBN 0-8204-1212-0
Jump up ^ Weingast, Barry R. (Summer 2005). "The Constitutional Dilemma of Economic Liberty". Journal of Economic Perspectives. 19 (3): 89–108. doi:10.1257/089533005774357815.
Jump up ^ González de Lara, Yadira; Greif, Avner; Jha, Saumitra (May 2008). "The Administrative Foundations of Self-Enforcing Constitutions". The American Economic Review. 98 (2): 105–109. doi:10.1257/aer.98.2.105.
Jump up ^ "Basic Laws - Introduction". The Knesset. 2016. Retrieved 7 May 2017. Article gives information on the procedures for amending each of the Basic Laws of Israel.
Jump up ^ UK principle: no Parliament is bound by the acts of its predecessors
Jump up ^ "Republic of Honduras: Political Constitution of 1982 through 2005 reforms; Article 374". Political Database of the Americas (in Spanish). Georgetown University.
Jump up ^ A synchronic comparative perspective were before the founding fathers of Italian Constitution, when they were faced with the question of bicameralism and related issues of confidence and the legislative procedure, Buonomo, Giampiero (2013). "Il bicameralismo tra due modelli mancati". L’Ago e il filo edizione online. – via Questia (subscription required)
External links
Look up constitution in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.
Wikiquote has quotations related to: Constitution
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Portal:Constitutional documents
Constitute, an indexed and searchable database of all constitutions in force
Dictionary of the History of Ideas Constitutionalism
Constitutional Law, "Constitutions, bibliography, links"
International Constitutional Law: English translations of various national constitutions
constitutions of countries of the European Union
United Nations Rule of Law: Constitution-making, on the relationship between constitution-making, the rule of law and the United Nations.
Democracy in Ancient India by Steve Muhlberger of Nipissing University
Report on the British constitution and proposed European constitution by Professor John McEldowney, University of Warwick Submitted as written evidence to House of Lords Select Committee on Constitution, published to the public on October 15, 2003.
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Constitution.
[hide]
v
t
e
Law
Core subjects
Administrative law
Constitutional law
Contract
Criminal law
Deed
Equity
Evidence
International law
Law of obligations
Procedure
Civil
Criminal
Property law
Public law
Restitution
Statutory law
Tort
Other subjects
Agricultural law
Aviation law
Banking law
Bankruptcy
Commercial law
Competition law
Conflict of laws
Construction law
Consumer protection
Corporate law
Cyberlaw
Election law
Energy law
Entertainment law
Environmental law
Family law
Financial regulation
Health law
Immigration law
Intellectual property
International criminal law
International human rights
International slavery laws
Labour
Law of war
Legal archaeology
Legal fiction
Maritime law
Media law
Military law
Probate
Estate
Will and testament
Product liability
Public international law
Space law
Sports law
Tax law
Transport law
Trust law
Women in law
Sources of law
Charter
Constitution
Custom
Divine right
Human rights
Natural and legal rights
Case law
Precedent
Law making
Ballot measure
Codification
Decree
Edict
Executive order
Proclamation
Legislation
Delegated legislation
Regulation
Rulemaking
Promulgation
Repeal
Treaty
Statutory law
Statute
Act of Parliament
Act of Congress (US)
Legal systems
Civil law
Common law
Chinese law
Legal pluralism
Religious law
Canon law
Hindu law
Jain law
Jewish law
Sharia
Roman law
Socialist law
Statutory law
Xeer
Yassa
Legal theory
Critical legal studies
Comparative law
Feminist
Law and economics
Legal formalism
History
Natural law
International legal theory
Principle of legality
Rule of law
Sociology
Jurisprudence
Adjudication
Administration of justice
Criminal justice
Court-martial
Dispute resolution
Fiqh
Lawsuit/Litigation
Legal opinion
Legal remedy
Judge
Justice of the peace
Magistrate
Judgment
Judicial review
Jurisdiction
Jury
Justice
Practice of law
Attorney
Barrister
Counsel
Lawyer
Legal representation
Prosecutor
Solicitor
Question of fact
Question of law
Trial
Trial advocacy
Trier of fact
Verdict
Legal institutions
Bureaucracy
The bar
The bench
Civil society
Court
Election commission
Executive
Judiciary
Law enforcement
Legal education
Law school
Legislature
Military
Police
Political party
Tribunal
Category
Index
Outline
Portal
Authority control
GND: 4062787-1
HDS: 9615
NKC: ph117714
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Constitution&oldid=838500376"
Categories:
Constitutions
Sources of law
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)
Subscription required using via
Pages containing links to subscription-only content
Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism
Use mdy dates from January 2016
Articles containing Arabic-language text
Articles containing Serbian-language text
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from September 2016
Articles that may contain original research from September 2016
All articles that may contain original research
Articles needing additional references from September 2016
All articles needing additional references
Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2017
All articles containing potentially dated statements
Articles that may contain original research from December 2010
Articles needing additional references from December 2010
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2017
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
View source
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Wikisource
Languages
Afrikaans
Alemannisch
አማርኛ
العربية
Aragonés
Asturianu
Azərbaycanca
تۆرکجه
বাংলা
Bân-lâm-gú
Башҡортса
Беларуская
Беларуская (тарашкевіца)
Български
Bosanski
Brezhoneg
Буряад
Català
Чӑвашла
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Fiji Hindi
Français
Frysk
Gàidhlig
Galego
한국어
Հայերեն
हिन्दी
Hrvatski
Ido
Ilokano
Bahasa Indonesia
Interlingua
Íslenska
Italiano
עברית
Basa Jawa
ಕನ್ನಡ
Къарачай-малкъар
ქართული
Kaszëbsczi
Қазақша
Kiswahili
Коми
Kreyòl ayisyen
Kurdî
Кыргызча
ລາວ
Latina
Latviešu
Lietuvių
Limburgs
Lingála
Lumbaart
Magyar
Македонски
Malagasy
മലയാളം
मराठी
მარგალური
مصرى
Bahasa Melayu
Mìng-dĕ̤ng-ngṳ̄
Mirandés
Монгол
မြန်မာဘာသာ
Nederlands
Nedersaksies
नेपाली
नेपाल भाषा
日本語
Нохчийн
Norsk
Norsk nynorsk
Nouormand
Occitan
Oʻzbekcha/ўзбекча
ਪੰਜਾਬੀ
پنجابی
پښتو
Patois
Piemontèis
Plattdüütsch
Polski
Português
Română
Runa Simi
Русиньскый
Русский
Саха тыла
Scots
Shqip
Sicilianu
සිංහල
Simple English
سنڌي
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Soomaaliga
کوردی
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Татарча/tatarça
తెలుగు
Tetun
ไทย
Тоҷикӣ
ᏣᎳᎩ
Türkçe
Thuɔŋjäŋ
Українська
اردو
Vèneto
Tiếng Việt
Walon
文言
Winaray
吴语
ייִדיש
粵語
Žemaitėška
中文
Kabɩyɛ
127 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 27 April 2018, at 12:25.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

value: mw-page-base noprint

value: mw-head-base noprint

value: This article is semi-protected due to vandalism

value: firstHeading firstHeading en

value: siteSub noprint

value: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attr: href class title

value:
/wiki/Constitution_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Constitution (disambiguation)

attr: role class

value:
note
hatnote navigation-not-searchable

attr: class style

value:
/wiki/Sovereign_country
mw-redirect
Sovereign country

value:
/wiki/French_(language)
mw-redirect
French (language)

value:
/wiki/Latin_language
mw-redirect
Latin language

value:
/wiki/Roman_Emperor
mw-redirect
Roman Emperor

value:
/wiki/Federal_state
mw-redirect
Federal state

value:
/wiki/Code_of_justice
mw-redirect
Code of justice

value:
/wiki/Forms_of_government
mw-redirect
Forms of government

value:
/wiki/613_Commandments
mw-redirect
613 Commandments

value:
/wiki/Death_penalty
mw-redirect
Death penalty

value:
/wiki/Cleisthenes_of_Athens
mw-redirect
Cleisthenes of Athens

value: Constitution of the Athenians (Aristotle)

value:
/wiki/Code_of_Manu
mw-redirect
Code of Manu

value:
/wiki/Germanic_tribal_laws
mw-redirect
Germanic tribal laws

value:
/wiki/Lex_Visigothorum
mw-redirect
Lex Visigothorum

value:
/wiki/Anglo-Saxon_language
mw-redirect
Anglo-Saxon language

value:
/wiki/Prince_Shotoku
mw-redirect
Prince Shotoku

value:
/wiki/Arabic_language
mw-redirect
Arabic language

value:
/wiki/Islamic_prophet
mw-redirect
Islamic prophet

value:
/wiki/Hijra_(Islam)
mw-redirect
Hijra (Islam)

value:
/wiki/List_of_Ukrainian_rulers
mw-redirect
List of Ukrainian rulers

value:
/wiki/Great_Novgorod
mw-redirect
Great Novgorod

value:
/wiki/John_of_England
mw-redirect
John of England

value:
/wiki/Constitutional_Monarchy
mw-redirect
Constitutional Monarchy

value:
/wiki/British_House_of_Commons
mw-redirect
British House of Commons

value:
/wiki/St._Sava%27s_Nomocanon
mw-redirect
St. Sava's Nomocanon

value:
/wiki/Ecumenical_Councils
mw-redirect
Ecumenical Councils

value:
/wiki/Serbian_Ortodox_Church
mw-redirect
Serbian Ortodox Church

value:
/wiki/Holy_Fathers
mw-redirect
Holy Fathers

value:
/wiki/Byzantine_emperors
mw-redirect
Byzantine emperors

value:
/wiki/Legal_transplants
mw-redirect
Legal transplants

value:
/wiki/Corpus_Iuris_Civilis
mw-redirect
Corpus Iuris Civilis

value:
/wiki/Eike_von_Repgow
mw-redirect
Eike von Repgow

value: 'Abul Fada'il Ibn al-'Assal (page does not exist)

value:
/wiki/Fetha_Negest
mw-redirect
Fetha Negest

value:
/wiki/Ge%27ez_language
mw-redirect
Ge'ez language

value:
/wiki/Constitution_of_Ethiopia
mw-redirect
Constitution of Ethiopia

value:
/wiki/Usatges_of_Barcelona
mw-redirect
Usatges of Barcelona

value:
/wiki/Huang_Ming_Zu_Xun
mw-redirect
Huang Ming Zu Xun

value:
/wiki/Ming_Dynasty
mw-redirect
Ming Dynasty

value:
/wiki/Civil_law_(area)
mw-redirect
Civil law (area)

value:
/wiki/Donald_A._Grinde,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Donald A. Grinde, Jr.

value:
/wiki/Bruce_Johansen
mw-redirect
Bruce Johansen

value: Constitutional Convention (United States)

value:
/wiki/Colony_of_Connecticut
mw-redirect
Colony of Connecticut

value:
/wiki/Constitution_State
mw-redirect
Constitution State

value:
/wiki/English_Protectorate
mw-redirect
English Protectorate

value:
/wiki/John_Lambert_(General)
mw-redirect
John Lambert (General)

value:
/wiki/Grandee_(New_Model_Army)
mw-redirect
Grandee (New Model Army)

value:
/wiki/Agreement_of_the_People
mw-redirect
Agreement of the People

value:
/wiki/Swedish_Constitution_of_1772
mw-redirect
Swedish Constitution of 1772

value:
/wiki/St._John%27s_Cathedral,_Warsaw
mw-redirect
St. John's Cathedral, Warsaw

value:
/wiki/Constitution_of_May_3,_1791
mw-redirect
Constitution of May 3, 1791

value:
/wiki/Warsaw%27s_Royal_Castle
mw-redirect
Warsaw's Royal Castle

value:
/wiki/Spirit_of_the_Laws
mw-redirect
Spirit of the Laws

value: Charles de Secondat, Baron de Montesquieu

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (September 2016)

value:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

value:
/wiki/South_Europe
mw-redirect
South Europe

value:
/wiki/Serbian_revolution
mw-redirect
Serbian revolution

value:
/wiki/Law_of_nations
mw-redirect
Law of nations

value: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Original_research

value: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

value: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Refimprove

value: Constitutional convention (political custom)

value: plainlinks noexcerpt noprint asof-tag update

value:
/wiki/Westminster_System
mw-redirect
Westminster System

value:
/wiki/British_constitutional_law
mw-redirect
British constitutional law

value: Statute of Westminster Adoption Act 1942

value: List of Canadian constitutional documents

value:
/wiki/Acts_of_Parliament
mw-redirect
Acts of Parliament

value:
/wiki/English_Bill_of_Rights
mw-redirect
English Bill of Rights

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2017)

value:
/wiki/Trial_by_jury
mw-redirect
Trial by jury

value:
/wiki/Right_to_revolution
mw-redirect
Right to revolution

value: Basic Law for the Federal Republic of Germany

value:
/wiki/Metric_system_of_measurement
mw-redirect
Metric system of measurement

value: Charles de Secondat, baron de Montesquieu

value:
/wiki/Executive_branch
mw-redirect
Executive branch

value:
/wiki/Vote_of_no_confidence
mw-redirect
Vote of no confidence

value:
/wiki/United_Kingdom_Parliament
mw-redirect
United Kingdom Parliament

value: Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe

value: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

value:
nofollow
external text
http://hnn.us/articles/12974.html

value:
/wiki/John_Markoff_(professor)
mw-redirect
John Markoff (professor)

value:
/wiki/The_Law_of_War_and_Peace
mw-redirect
The Law of War and Peace

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.constitution.org/vct/vct.htm

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1257%2Faer.98.2.105

value: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

value:
nofollow
external text
http://constituteproject.org

value:
nofollow
http://www.servat.unibe.ch/icl/
external text

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.constitution.eu

value:
/wiki/Maritime_law
mw-redirect
Maritime law

value:
/wiki/Public_international_law
mw-redirect
Public international law

value:
/wiki/Executive_order_(disambiguation)
mw-disambig
Executive order (disambiguation)

value:
/wiki/Delegated_legislation
mw-redirect
Delegated legislation

value:
/wiki/Legal_theory
mw-redirect
Legal theory

value:
/wiki/International_legal_theory
mw-redirect
International legal theory

value:
/wiki/Principle_of_legality
mw-redirect
Principle of legality

value:
/wiki/Legal_representation
mw-redirect
Legal representation

value:
/wiki/Question_of_fact
mw-redirect
Question of fact

value:
navbox-abovebelow hlist
2
text-align:center;

value: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/4062787-1

value: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

value: Category:CS1 Spanish-language sources (es)

value: Category:Subscription required using via

value: Category:Pages containing links to subscription-only content

value: Category:Wikipedia pages semi-protected against vandalism

value: Category:Use mdy dates from January 2016

value: Category:Articles containing Arabic-language text

value: Category:Articles containing Serbian-language text

value: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from September 2016

value: Category:Articles that may contain original research from September 2016

value: Category:All articles that may contain original research

value: Category:Articles needing additional references from September 2016

value: Category:All articles needing additional references

value: Category:Articles containing potentially dated statements from 2017

value: Category:All articles containing potentially dated statements

value: Category:Articles that may contain original research from December 2010

value: Category:Articles needing additional references from December 2010

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2017

value: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

value: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

value: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

value: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

value: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

value:
/wiki/Constitution
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

value:
This page is protected.
You can view its source [ctrl-alt-e]

value: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

value: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

value: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

value:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

value: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

value: Permanent link to this revision of the page

value: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

value: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

value: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

value:
https://af.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grondwet
Grondwet – Afrikaans
af
af
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-af
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-als
display: none;

value: ሕገ መንግሥት – Amharic

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-am
display: none;

value: دستور – Arabic

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-an
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ast
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-azb
display: none;

value: সংবিধান – Bangla

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bn
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-min-nan
display: none;

value: Конституция – Bashkir

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ba
display: none;

value: Канстытуцыя – Belarusian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

value: Канстытуцыя – Belarusian (Taraškievica orthography)

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be-x-old
display: none;

value: Конституция – Bulgarian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

value:
https://bs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustav
Ustav – Bosnian
bs
bs
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bs
display: none;

value:
https://br.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bonreizh
Bonreizh – Breton
br
br
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-br
display: none;

value: Үндэһэн хуули – Russia Buriat

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bxr
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

value: Конституци – Chuvash

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cv
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-de
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

value: Σύνταγμα – Greek

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

value: قانون اساسی – Persian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

value:
https://hif.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vidhaan
Vidhaan – Fiji Hindi
hif
hif
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hif
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fy
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gd
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-ko badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

value: Սահմանադրություն – Armenian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hy
display: none;

value: संविधान – Hindi

value:
https://hr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustav
Ustav – Croatian
hr
hr
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-io
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ilo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ia
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-is
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jv
display: none;

value: ಸಂವಿಧಾನ – Kannada

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kn
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-krc
display: none;

value: კონსტიტუცია – Georgian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ka
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-csb
display: none;

value: Конституция – Kazakh

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kk
display: none;

value:
https://sw.wikipedia.org/wiki/Katiba
Katiba – Swahili
sw
sw
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sw
display: none;

value: Конституция – Komi

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kv
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ht
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ku
display: none;

value: Конституция – Kyrgyz

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ky
display: none;

value: ລັດຖະທຳມະນູນ – Lao

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-la
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lv
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-li
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ln
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lmo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mg
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ml
display: none;

value: संविधान – Marathi

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mr
display: none;

value: კონსტიტუცია – Mingrelian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-xmf
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-arz
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ms
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cdo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mwl
display: none;

value: Үндсэн хууль – Mongolian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-mn
display: none;

value: ဖွဲ့စည်းအုပ်ချုပ်ပုံအခြေခံဥပဒေ – Burmese

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-my
display: none;

value:
https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grondwet
Grondwet – Dutch
nl
nl
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nds-nl
display: none;

value: संविधान – Nepali

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ne
display: none;

value: संविधान – Newari

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-new
display: none;

value: コンスティチューション (法学) – Japanese

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

value: Конституци – Chechen

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ce
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

value:
https://nn.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grunnlov
Grunnlov – Norwegian Nynorsk
nn
nn
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nn
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nrm
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-oc
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uz
display: none;

value: ਸੰਵਿਧਾਨ – Punjabi

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pa
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pnb
display: none;

value: اساسي قانون – Pashto

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ps
display: none;

value: Kanstityuushan – Jamaican Creole English

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-jam
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pms
display: none;

value:
https://nds.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verfaten
Verfaten – Low German
nds
nds
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nds
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pt
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-qu
display: none;

value: Конштітуція – Rusyn

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-rue
display: none;

value: Конституция – Russian

value: Конституция – Sakha

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sah
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sco
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sq
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-scn
display: none;

value: ආණ්ඩුක්‍රම ව්‍යවස්ථාව – Sinhala

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-si
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sd
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

value:
https://sl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustava
Ustava – Slovenian
sl
sl
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

value:
https://so.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dastuur
Dastuur – Somali
so
so
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-so
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ckb
display: none;

value:
https://sh.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ustav
Ustav – Serbo-Croatian
sh
sh
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

value:
https://sv.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grundlag
Grundlag – Swedish
sv
sv
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

value: அரசியலமைப்புச் சட்டம் – Tamil

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

value: Конституция – Tatar

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tt
display: none;

value: రాజ్యాంగం – Telugu

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-te
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tet
display: none;

value: รัฐธรรมนูญ – Thai

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

value: Қонуни асосии давлат – Tajik

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tg
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-chr
display: none;

value:
https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anayasa
Anayasa – Turkish
tr
tr
interlanguage-link-target

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-din
display: none;

value: Конституція – Ukrainian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vec
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-wa
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-war
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-wuu
display: none;

value: קאנסטיטוציע – Yiddish

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-yi
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-zh-yue
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bat-smg
display: none;

value: Ɛjaɖɛ paɣtʊ takayaɣ (Constitution) – Kabiye

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kbp
display: none;

value: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

value: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

value: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

value:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

value: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Constitution rootpage-Constitution skin-vector action-view