text:
Business cycle
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Economics
A supply and demand diagram, illustrating
the effects of an increase in demand
Index
Outline
Category
History
Types
Classification
History of economics
Economic history (academic study)
Schools of economics
Microeconomics
Macroeconomics
Methodology
Heterodox economics
JEL classification codes
Concepts
Theory
Techniques
Econometrics
Economic growth
Economic system
Experimental economics
Mathematical economics
Game theory
Post-scarcity
Market
National accounting
By application
Agricultural
Behavioral
Business
Computational
Cultural
Demographic
Development
Digitization
Ecological
Education
Engineering
Environmental
Evolutionary
Expeditionary
Geography
Health
Industrial organization
Information
International
Knowledge
Labour
Law
Managerial
Monetary / Financial
Natural resource
Organizational
Personnel
Public / Welfare economics
Regional
Rural
Service
Social
Urban
Welfare
Lists
Economists
Publications (journals)
Glossary
Glossary of economics
Business and economics portal
v
t
e
The business cycle, also known as the economic cycle or trade cycle, is the downward and upward movement of gross domestic product (GDP) around its long-term growth trend.[1] The length of a business cycle is the period of time containing a single boom and contraction in sequence. These fluctuations typically involve shifts over time between periods of relatively rapid economic growth (expansions or booms), and periods of relative stagnation or decline (contractions or recessions).
Business cycles are usually measured by considering the growth rate of real gross domestic product. Despite the often-applied term cycles, these fluctuations in economic activity do not exhibit uniform or predictable periodicity.
The common or popular usage boom-and-bust cycle refers to fluctuations in which the expansion is rapid and the contraction severe.[citation needed]
Contents
[hide]
1 History
1.1 Theory
1.2 Classification by periods
1.3 Accurate classification of business cycles
1.4 Occurrence
2 Identifying
2.1 Upper turning points of business cycle, commodity prices and freight rates
2.2 Spectral analysis of business cycles
2.3 Cycles or fluctuations?
3 Proposed explanations
3.1 Exogenous vs. endogenous
3.2 Keynesian
3.3 Credit/debt cycle
3.4 Real business cycle theory
3.5 Product based theory of economic cycles
3.6 Politically based business cycle
3.7 Marxian economics
3.8 Austrian School
3.9 Yield curve
3.10 Georgism
4 Mitigating an economic downturn
5 See also
6 Notes
7 References
8 External links
History[edit]
Theory[edit]
Phases of the business cycle
Long Term Growth of GDP
The first systematic exposition of periodic economic crises, in opposition to the existing theory of economic equilibrium, was the 1819 Nouveaux Principes d'économie politique by Jean Charles Léonard de Sismondi.[2] Prior to that point classical economics had either denied the existence of business cycles,[3] blamed them on external factors, notably war,[4] or only studied the long term. Sismondi found vindication in the Panic of 1825, which was the first unarguably international economic crisis, occurring in peacetime.
Sismondi and his contemporary Robert Owen, who expressed similar but less systematic thoughts in 1817 Report to the Committee of the Association for the Relief of the Manufacturing Poor, both identified the cause of economic cycles as overproduction and underconsumption, caused in particular by wealth inequality. They advocated government intervention and socialism, respectively, as the solution. This work did not generate interest among classical economists, though underconsumption theory developed as a heterodox branch in economics until being systematized in Keynesian economics in the 1930s.
Sismondi's theory of periodic crises was developed into a theory of alternating cycles by Charles Dunoyer,[5] and similar theories, showing signs of influence by Sismondi, were developed by Johann Karl Rodbertus. Periodic crises in capitalism formed the basis of the theory of Karl Marx, who further claimed that these crises were increasing in severity and, on the basis of which, he predicted a communist revolution. Though only passing references in Das Kapital (1867) refer to crises, they were extensively discussed in Marx's posthumously published books, particularly in Theories of Surplus Value. In Progress and Poverty (1879), Henry George focused on land's role in crises – particularly land speculation – and proposed a single tax on land as a solution.
Classification by periods[edit]
Business cycle with it specific forces in four stages according to Malcolm C. Rorty, 1922
In 1860 French economist Clement Juglar first identified economic cycles 7 to 11 years long, although he cautiously did not claim any rigid regularity.[6] Later[when?], economist Joseph Schumpeter (1883–1950) argued that a Juglar cycle has four stages:
expansion (increase in production and prices, low interest-rates)
crisis (stock exchanges crash and multiple bankruptcies of firms occur)
recession (drops in prices and in output, high interest-rates)
recovery (stocks recover because of the fall in prices and incomes)
Schumpeter's Juglar model associates recovery and prosperity with increases in productivity, consumer confidence, aggregate demand, and prices.
In the 20th century, Schumpeter and others proposed a typology of business cycles according to their periodicity, so that a number of particular cycles were named after their discoverers or proposers:[7]
Proposed economic waves
Cycle/wave name
Period (years)
Kitchin cycle (inventory, e.g. pork cycle) 3–5
Juglar cycle (fixed investment) 7–11
Kuznets swing (infrastructural investment) 15–25
Kondratiev wave (technological basis) 45–60
This box:
view
talk
edit
the Kitchin inventory cycle of 3 to 5 years (after Joseph Kitchin);[8]
the Juglar fixed-investment cycle of 7 to 11 years (often identified[by whom?] as "the" business cycle)
the Kuznets infrastructural investment cycle of 15 to 25 years (after Simon Kuznets – also called "building cycle")
the Kondratiev wave or long technological cycle of 45 to 60 years (after the Soviet economist Nikolai Kondratiev).[9]
Interest in the different typologies of cycles has waned since the development of modern macroeconomics, which gives little support to the idea of regular periodic cycles.[10]
Accurate classification of business cycles[edit]
In the 21st century, the Ledenyov discrete-time digital business cycles were discovered, making it possible to precisely characterize the economic output oscillations in the amplitude, frequency, phase, time and polarization spaces. [11]
Occurrence[edit]
A simplified Kondratiev wave, with the theory that productivity enhancing innovations drive waves of economic growth.
There were great increases in productivity, industrial production and real per capita product throughout the period from 1870 to 1890 that included the Long Depression and two other recessions.[12][13] There were also significant increases in productivity in the years leading up to the Great Depression. Both the Long and Great Depressions were characterized by overcapacity and market saturation.[14][15]
Over the period since the Industrial Revolution, technological progress has had a much larger effect on the economy than any fluctuations in credit or debt, the primary exception being the Great Depression, which caused a multi-year steep economic decline. The effect of technological progress can be seen by the purchasing power of an average hour's work, which has grown from $3 in 1900 to $22 in 1990, measured in 2010 dollars.[16] There were similar increases in real wages during the 19th century. (See: Productivity improving technologies (historical).) A table of innovations and long cycles can be seen at: Kondratiev wave § Modern modifications of Kondratiev theory.
There were frequent crises in Europe and America in the 19th and first half of the 20th century, specifically the period 1815–1939. This period started from the end of the Napoleonic wars in 1815, which was immediately followed by the Post-Napoleonic depression in the United Kingdom (1815–30), and culminated in the Great Depression of 1929–39, which led into World War II. See Financial crisis: 19th century for listing and details. The first of these crises not associated with a war was the Panic of 1825.[citation needed]
Business cycles in OECD countries after World War II were generally more restrained than the earlier business cycles. This was particularly true during the Golden Age of Capitalism (1945/50–1970s), and the period 1945–2008 did not experience a global downturn until the Late-2000s recession.[17] Economic stabilization policy using fiscal policy and monetary policy appeared to have dampened the worst excesses of business cycles, and automatic stabilization due to the aspects of the government's budget also helped mitigate the cycle even without conscious action by policy-makers.[citation needed]
In this period, the economic cycle – at least the problem of depressions – was twice declared dead. The first declaration was in the late 1960s, when the Phillips curve was seen as being able to steer the economy. However, this was followed by stagflation in the 1970s, which discredited the theory. The second declaration was in the early 2000s, following the stability and growth in the 1980s and 1990s in what came to be known as The Great Moderation. Notably, in 2003, Robert Lucas, in his presidential address to the American Economic Association, declared that the "central problem of depression-prevention [has] been solved, for all practical purposes."[18] Unfortunately, this was followed by the 2008–2012 global recession.
Various regions have experienced prolonged depressions, most dramatically the economic crisis in former Eastern Bloc countries following the end of the Soviet Union in 1991. For several of these countries the period 1989–2010 has been an ongoing depression, with real income still lower than in 1989.[citation needed] This has been attributed not to a cyclical pattern, but to a mismanaged transition from command economies to market economies.
Identifying[edit]
Economic activity in the US, 1954–2005.
Deviations from the long-term US growth trend, 1954–2005.
In 1946, economists Arthur F. Burns and Wesley C. Mitchell provided the now standard definition of business cycles in their book Measuring Business Cycles:[19]
Business cycles are a type of fluctuation found in the aggregate economic activity of nations that organize their work mainly in business enterprises: a cycle consists of expansions occurring at about the same time in many economic activities, followed by similarly general recessions, contractions, and revivals which merge into the expansion phase of the next cycle; in duration, business cycles vary from more than one year to ten or twelve years; they are not divisible into shorter cycles of similar characteristics with amplitudes approximating their own.
According to A. F. Burns:[20]
Business cycles are not merely fluctuations in aggregate economic activity. The critical feature that distinguishes them from the commercial convulsions of earlier centuries or from the seasonal and other short term variations of our own age is that the fluctuations are widely diffused over the economy – its industry, its commercial dealings, and its tangles of finance. The economy of the western world is a system of closely interrelated parts. He who would understand business cycles must master the workings of an economic system organized largely in a network of free enterprises searching for profit. The problem of how business cycles come about is therefore inseparable from the problem of how a capitalist economy functions.
In the United States, it is generally accepted that the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) is the final arbiter of the dates of the peaks and troughs of the business cycle. An expansion is the period from a trough to a peak, and a recession as the period from a peak to a trough. The NBER identifies a recession as "a significant decline in economic activity spread across the economy, lasting more than a few months, normally visible in real GDP, real income, employment, industrial production".[21]
Upper turning points of business cycle, commodity prices and freight rates[edit]
There is often a close timing relationship between the upper turning points of the business cycle, commodity prices and freight rates, which is shown to be particularly tight in the grand peak years of 1873, 1889, 1900 and 1912.[22]
Spectral analysis of business cycles[edit]
Recent research employing spectral analysis has confirmed the presence of Kondratiev waves in the world GDP dynamics at an acceptable level of statistical significance.[23] Korotayev & Tsirel also detected shorter business cycles, dating the Kuznets to about 17 years and calling it the third sub-harmonic of the Kondratiev, meaning that there are three Kuznets cycles per Kondratiev.[jargon]
Cycles or fluctuations?[edit]
In recent years economic theory has moved towards the study of economic fluctuation rather than a 'business cycle'[24] – though some economists use the phrase 'business cycle' as a convenient shorthand. For example, Milton Friedman said that calling the business cycle a "cycle" is a misnomer, because of its non-cyclical nature. Friedman believed that for the most part, excluding very large supply shocks, business declines are more of a monetary phenomenon.[25]
Proposed explanations[edit]
The explanation of fluctuations in aggregate economic activity is one of the primary concerns of macroeconomics. The main framework for explaining such fluctuations is Keynesian economics. In the Keynesian view, business cycles reflect the possibility that the economy may reach short-run equilibrium at levels below or above full employment. If the economy is operating with less than full employment, i.e., with high unemployment, Keynesian theory states that monetary policy and fiscal policy can have a positive role to play in smoothing the fluctuations of the business cycle.
Beside the Keynesian explanation there are a number of alternative theories of business cycles, largely associated with particular schools or theorists in heterodox economics. A common alternative within mainstream economics is real business cycle theory. Nowadays other notable theories are credit-based explanations such as debt deflation and the financial instability hypothesis. The latter two gained interest for being able to explain the subprime mortgage crisis and financial crises.
Exogenous vs. endogenous[edit]
Within mainstream economics, the debate over external (exogenous) versus internal (endogenous) being the causes of the economic cycles, with the classical school (now neo-classical) arguing for exogenous causes and the underconsumptionist (now Keynesian) school arguing for endogenous causes. These may also broadly be classed as "supply-side" and "demand-side" explanations: supply-side explanations may be styled, following Say's law, as arguing that "supply creates its own demand", while demand-side explanations argue that effective demand may fall short of supply, yielding a recession or depression.
This debate has important policy consequences: proponents of exogenous causes of crises such as neoclassicals largely argue for minimal government policy or regulation (laissez faire), as absent these external shocks, the market functions, while proponents of endogenous causes of crises such as Keynesians largely argue for larger government policy and regulation, as absent regulation, the market will move from crisis to crisis. This division is not absolute – some classicals (including Say) argued for government policy to mitigate the damage of economic cycles, despite believing in external causes, while Austrian School economists argue against government involvement as only worsening crises, despite believing in internal causes.
The view of the economic cycle as caused exogenously dates to Say's law, and much debate on endogeneity or exogeneity of causes of the economic cycle is framed in terms of refuting or supporting Say's law; this is also referred to as the "general glut" (supply in relation to demand) debate.
Until the Keynesian revolution in mainstream economics in the wake of the Great Depression, classical and neoclassical explanations (exogenous causes) were the mainstream explanation of economic cycles; following the Keynesian revolution, neoclassical macroeconomics was largely rejected. There has been some resurgence of neoclassical approaches in the form of real business cycle (RBC) theory. The debate between Keynesians and neo-classical advocates was reawakened following the recession of 2007.
Mainstream economists working in the neoclassical tradition, as opposed to the Keynesian tradition, have usually viewed the departures of the harmonic working of the market economy as due to exogenous influences, such as the State or its regulations, labor unions, business monopolies, or shocks due to technology or natural causes.
Contrarily, in the heterodox tradition of Jean Charles Léonard de Sismondi, Clement Juglar, and Marx the recurrent upturns and downturns of the market system are an endogenous characteristic of it.[26]
The 19th-century school of underconsumptionism also posited endogenous causes for the business cycle, notably the paradox of thrift, and today this previously heterodox school has entered the mainstream in the form of Keynesian economics via the Keynesian revolution.
Keynesian[edit]
According to Keynesian economics, fluctuations in aggregate demand cause the economy to come to short run equilibrium at levels that are different from the full employment rate of output. These fluctuations express themselves as the observed business cycles. Keynesian models do not necessarily imply periodic business cycles. However, simple Keynesian models involving the interaction of the Keynesian multiplier and accelerator give rise to cyclical responses to initial shocks. Paul Samuelson's "oscillator model"[27] is supposed to account for business cycles thanks to the multiplier and the accelerator. The amplitude of the variations in economic output depends on the level of the investment, for investment determines the level of aggregate output (multiplier), and is determined by aggregate demand (accelerator).
In the Keynesian tradition, Richard Goodwin[28] accounts for cycles in output by the distribution of income between business profits and workers' wages. The fluctuations in wages are almost the same as in the level of employment (wage cycle lags one period behind the employment cycle), for when the economy is at high employment, workers are able to demand rises in wages, whereas in periods of high unemployment, wages tend to fall. According to Goodwin, when unemployment and business profits rise, the output rises.
Credit/debt cycle[edit]
Main articles: Credit cycle and Debt deflation
One alternative theory is that the primary cause of economic cycles is due to the credit cycle: the net expansion of credit (increase in private credit, equivalently debt, as a percentage of GDP) yields economic expansions, while the net contraction causes recessions, and if it persists, depressions. In particular, the bursting of speculative bubbles is seen as the proximate cause of depressions, and this theory places finance and banks at the center of the business cycle.
A primary theory in this vein is the debt deflation theory of Irving Fisher, which he proposed to explain the Great Depression. A more recent complementary theory is the Financial Instability Hypothesis of Hyman Minsky, and the credit theory of economic cycles is often associated with Post-Keynesian economics such as Steve Keen.
Post-Keynesian economist Hyman Minsky has proposed an explanation of cycles founded on fluctuations in credit, interest rates and financial frailty, called the Financial Instability Hypothesis. In an expansion period, interest rates are low and companies easily borrow money from banks to invest. Banks are not reluctant to grant them loans, because expanding economic activity allows business increasing cash flows and therefore they will be able to easily pay back the loans. This process leads to firms becoming excessively indebted, so that they stop investing, and the economy goes into recession.
While credit causes have not been a primary theory of the economic cycle within the mainstream, they have gained occasional mention, such as (Eckstein & Sinai 1986), cited approvingly by (Summers 1986).
Carlota Perez blames "financial capital" for excess speculation, which she claims is likely to occur in the "frenzy" stage of a new technology, such as the 1998–2000 computer, internet, dot.com mania and bust. Perez also says excess speculation is likely to occur in the mature phase of a technological age.[29]
Real business cycle theory[edit]
Main article: Real Business Cycle theory
Within mainstream economics, Keynesian views have been challenged by real business cycle models in which fluctuations are due to technology shocks. This theory is most associated with Finn E. Kydland and Edward C. Prescott, and more generally the Chicago school of economics (freshwater economics). They consider that economic crisis and fluctuations cannot stem from a monetary shock, only from an external shock, such as an innovation.[citation needed]
Product based theory of economic cycles[edit]
International product life cycle
This theory explains the nature and causes of economic cycles from the viewpoint of life-cycle of marketable goods.[30] The theory originates from the work of Raymond Vernon, who described the development of international trade in terms of product life-cycle – a period of time during which the product circulates in the market. Vernon stated that some countries specialize in the production and export of technologically new products, while others specialize in the production of already known products. The most developed countries are able to invest large amounts of money in the technological innovations and produce new products, thus obtaining a dynamic comparative advantage over developing countries.
Recent research by Georgiy Revyakin proves initial Vernon theory and shows that economic cycles in developed countries overrun economic cycles in developing countries.[31] He also presumes that economic cycles with different periodicity can be compared to the products with various life-cycles. In case of Kondratiev waves such products correlate with fundamental discoveries implemented in production (inventions which form the technological paradigm: Richard Arkwright's machines, steam engines, industrial use of electricity, computer invention, etc.); Kuznets cycles describe such products as infrastructural components (roadways, transport, utilities, etc.); Juglar cycles may go in parallel with enterprise fixed capital (equipment, machinery, etc.), and Kitchin cycles are characterized by change in the society preferences (tastes) for consumer goods, and time, which is necessary to start the production.
Simultaneous technological updates by all economic agents (as a result, cycle formation) would be determined by highly competitive market conditions: in case if a manufacturing technology at an enterprise does not meet the current technological environment, – such company loses its competitiveness and eventually goes bankrupt.
Politically based business cycle[edit]
Another set of models tries to derive the business cycle from political decisions. The partisan business cycle suggests that cycles result from the successive elections of administrations with different policy regimes. Regime A adopts expansionary policies, resulting in growth and inflation, but is voted out of office when inflation becomes unacceptably high. The replacement, Regime B, adopts contractionary policies reducing inflation and growth, and the downwards swing of the cycle. It is voted out of office when unemployment is too high, being replaced by Party A.
The political business cycle is an alternative theory stating that when an administration of any hue is elected, it initially adopts a contractionary policy to reduce inflation and gain a reputation for economic competence. It then adopts an expansionary policy in the lead up to the next election, hoping to achieve simultaneously low inflation and unemployment on election day.[32]
The political business cycle theory is strongly linked to the name of Michał Kalecki who discussed "the reluctance of the 'captains of industry' to accept government intervention in the matter of employment."[33] Persistent full employment would mean increasing workers' bargaining power to raise wages and to avoid doing unpaid labor, potentially hurting profitability. (He did not see this theory as applying under fascism, which would use direct force to destroy labor's power.) In recent years, proponents of the "electoral business cycle" theory[who?] have argued that incumbent politicians encourage prosperity before elections in order to ensure re-election – and make the citizens pay for it with recessions afterwards.
Marxian economics[edit]
For Marx the economy based on production of commodities to be sold in the market is intrinsically prone to crisis. In the heterodox Marxian view profit is the major engine of the market economy, but business (capital) profitability has a tendency to fall that recurrently creates crises, in which mass unemployment occurs, businesses fail, remaining capital is centralized and concentrated and profitability is recovered. In the long run these crises tend to be more severe and the system will eventually fail.[34]
Some Marxist authors such as Rosa Luxemburg viewed the lack of purchasing power of workers as a cause of a tendency of supply to be larger than demand, creating crisis, in a model that has similarities with the Keynesian one. Indeed, a number of modern authors have tried to combine Marx's and Keynes's views. Henryk Grossman[35] reviewed the debates and the counteracting tendencies and Paul Mattick subsequently emphasized the basic differences between the Marxian and the Keynesian perspective: while Keynes saw capitalism as a system worth maintaining and susceptible to efficient regulation, Marx viewed capitalism as a historically doomed system that cannot be put under societal control.[36]
The American mathematician and economist, Richard M. Goodwin formalised a Marxist model of business cycles, known as the Goodwin Model in which recession was caused by increased bargaining power of workers (a result of high employment in boom periods) pushing up the wage share of national income, suppressing profits and leading to a breakdown in capital accumulation. Later theorists applying variants of the Goodwin model have identified both short and long period profit-led growth and distribution cycles in the United States, and elsewhere.[37][38][39][40][41] David Gordon provided a Marxist model of long period institutional growth cycles, in an attempt to explain the Kondratiev wave. This cycle is due to the periodic breakdown of the 'social structure of accumulation' – a set of institutions which secure and stabilise capital accumulation.
Austrian School[edit]
Main article: Austrian business cycle theory
Economists of the heterodox Austrian School argue that business cycles are caused by excessive issuance of credit by banks in fractional reserve banking systems. According to Austrian economists, excessive issuance of bank credit may be exacerbated if central bank monetary policy sets interest rates too low, and the resulting expansion of the money supply causes a "boom" in which resources are misallocated or "malinvested" because of artificially low interest rates. Eventually, the boom cannot be sustained and is followed by a "bust" in which the malinvestments are liquidated (sold for less than their original cost) and the money supply contracts.[42][43]
One of the criticisms of the Austrian business cycle theory is based on the observation that the United States suffered recurrent economic crises in the 19th century, notably the Panic of 1873, which occurred prior to the establishment of a U.S. central bank in 1913. Adherents of the Austrian School, such as the historian Thomas Woods, argue that these earlier financial crises were prompted by government and bankers' efforts to expand credit despite restraints imposed by the prevailing gold standard, and are thus consistent with Austrian Business Cycle Theory.[44][45]
The Austrian explanation of the business cycle differs significantly from the mainstream understanding of business cycles and is generally rejected by mainstream economists. Mainstream economists generally do not support Austrian school explanations for business cycles, on both theoretical as well as real-world empirical grounds.[46][47][48][49][50][51] Austrians routinely claim that the boom-and-bust business cycle is almost always caused by government intervention into the economy, but otherwise is a rare and mild phenomenon.
Yield curve[edit]
The slope of the yield curve is one of the most powerful predictors of future economic growth, inflation, and recessions.[52] One measure of the yield curve slope (i.e. the difference between 10-year Treasury bond rate and the 3-month Treasury bond rate) is included in the Financial Stress Index published by the St. Louis Fed.[53] A different measure of the slope (i.e. the difference between 10-year Treasury bond rates and the federal funds rate) is incorporated into the Index of Leading Economic Indicators published by The Conference Board.[54]
An inverted yield curve is often a harbinger of recession. A positively sloped yield curve is often a harbinger of inflationary growth. Work by Arturo Estrella and Tobias Adrian has established the predictive power of an inverted yield curve to signal a recession. Their models show that when the difference between short-term interest rates (they use 3-month T-bills) and long-term interest rates (10-year Treasury bonds) at the end of a federal reserve tightening cycle is negative or less than 93 basis points positive that a rise in unemployment usually occurs.[55] The New York Fed publishes a monthly recession probability prediction derived from the yield curve and based on Estrella's work.
All the recessions in the US since 1970 (up through 2017) have been preceded by an inverted yield curve (10-year vs 3-month). Over the same time frame, every occurrence of an inverted yield curve has been followed by recession as declared by the NBER business cycle dating committee.[56]
Event
Date of Inversion Start
Date of the Recession Start
Time from Inversion to Recession Start
Duration of Inversion
Time from Recession Start to NBER Announcement
Time from Disinversion to Recession End
Duration of Recession
Time from Recession End to NBER Announcement
Max Inversion
Months
Months
Months
Months
Months
Months
Basis Points
1970 Recession Dec-68 Jan-70 13 15 NA 8 11 NA −52
1974 Recession Jun-73 Dec-73 6 18 NA 3 16 NA −159
1980 Recession Nov-78 Feb-80 15 18 4 2 6 12 −328
1981–1982 Recession Oct-80 Aug-81 10 12 5 13 16 8 −351
1990 Recession Jun-89 Aug-90 14 7 8 14 8 21 −16
2001 Recession Jul-00 Apr-01 9 7 7 9 8 20 −70
2008–2009 Recession Aug-06 Jan-08 17 10 11 24 18 15 −51
Average since 1969 12 12 7 10 12 15 −147
Std Dev since 1969 3.83 4.72 2.74 7.50 4.78 5.45 138.96
Estrella and others have postulated that the yield curve affects the business cycle via the balance sheet of banks (or bank-like financial institutions).[57] When the yield curve is inverted banks are often caught paying more on short-term deposits (or other forms of short-term wholesale funding) than they are making on long-term loans leading to a loss of profitability and reluctance to lend resulting in a credit crunch. When the yield curve is upward sloping, banks can profitably take-in short term deposits and make long-term loans so they are eager to supply credit to borrowers. This eventually leads to a credit bubble.
Georgism[edit]
Henry George claimed land price fluctuations were the primary cause of most business cycles.[58] The theory is generally discounted by modern mainstream economists.[59]
Mitigating an economic downturn[edit]
Many social indicators, such as mental health, crimes, and suicides, worsen during economic recessions (though general mortality tends to fall, and it is in expansions when it tends to increase).[60] As periods of economic stagnation are painful for the many who lose their jobs, there is often political pressure for governments to mitigate recessions. Since the 1940s, following the Keynesian revolution, most governments of developed nations have seen the mitigation of the business cycle as part of the responsibility of government, under the rubric of stabilization policy.[citation needed]
Since in the Keynesian view, recessions are caused by inadequate aggregate demand, when a recession occurs the government should increase the amount of aggregate demand and bring the economy back into equilibrium. This the government can do in two ways, firstly by increasing the money supply (expansionary monetary policy) and secondly by increasing government spending or cutting taxes (expansionary fiscal policy).
By contrast, some economists, notably New classical economist Robert Lucas, argue that the welfare cost of business cycles are very small to negligible, and that governments should focus on long-term growth instead of stabilization.
However, even according to Keynesian theory, managing economic policy to smooth out the cycle is a difficult task in a society with a complex economy. Some theorists, notably those who believe in Marxian economics, believe that this difficulty is insurmountable. Karl Marx claimed that recurrent business cycle crises were an inevitable result of the operations of the capitalistic system. In this view, all that the government can do is to change the timing of economic crises. The crisis could also show up in a different form, for example as severe inflation or a steadily increasing government deficit. Worse, by delaying a crisis, government policy is seen as making it more dramatic and thus more painful.
Additionally, since the 1960s neoclassical economists have played down the ability of Keynesian policies to manage an economy. Since the 1960s, economists like Nobel Laureates Milton Friedman and Edmund Phelps have made ground in their arguments that inflationary expectations negate the Phillips curve in the long run. The stagflation of the 1970s provided striking support for their theories while proving a dilemma for Keynesian policies, which appeared to necessitate both expansionary policies to mitigate recession and contractionary policies to reduce inflation. Friedman has gone so far as to argue that all the central bank of a country should do is to avoid making large mistakes, as he believes they did by contracting the money supply very rapidly in the face of the Wall Street Crash of 1929, in which they made what would have been a recession into the Great Depression.[citation needed]
See also[edit]
Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium
Information revolution
Inventory investment over the business cycle
List of commodity booms
List of financial crises in the United States
Market trend
Skyscraper Index
Welfare cost of business cycles
World-systems theory
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ Madhani, P. M. (2010). "Rebalancing Fixed and Variable Pay in a Sales Organization: A Business Cycle Perspective". Compensation & Benefits Review. 42 (3): 179–189. doi:10.1177/0886368709359668.
Jump up ^ "Over Production and Under Consumption", ScarLett, History Of Economic Theory and Thought
Jump up ^ Batra, R. (2002). "Economics in Crisis: Severe and Logical Contradictions of Classical, Keynesian, and Popular Trade Models".
Jump up ^ http://www.thefreemanonline.org/featured/classical-economists-good-or-bad/. Missing or empty |title= (help)[dead link]
Jump up ^ Benkemoune, Rabah (2009). "Charles Dunoyer and the Emergence of the Idea of an Economic Cycle". History of Political Economy. 41 (2): 271–295. doi:10.1215/00182702-2009-003.
Jump up ^ M. W. Lee, Economic fluctuations. Homewood, IL, Richard D. Irwin, 1955
Jump up ^ Schumpeter, J. A. (1954). History of Economic Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Jump up ^ Kitchin, Joseph (1923). "Cycles and Trends in Economic Factors". Review of Economics and Statistics. The MIT Press. 5 (1): 10–16. doi:10.2307/1927031. JSTOR 1927031.
Jump up ^ Kondratieff, N. D.; Stolper, W. F. (1935). "The Long Waves in Economic Life". Review of Economics and Statistics. The MIT Press. 17 (6): 105–115. doi:10.2307/1928486. JSTOR 1928486.
Jump up ^ http://www.albany.edu/~bd445/Eco_301/Slides/Business_Cycle_Notes_(Print).pdf
Jump up ^ https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1803/1803.06108.pdf
Jump up ^ Wells, David A. (1890). Recent Economic Changes and Their Effect on Production and Distribution of Wealth and Well-Being of Society. New York: D. Appleton and Co. ISBN 0543724743.
Jump up ^ Rothbard, Murray (2002). History of Money and Banking in the United States (PDF). Ludwig Von Mises Inst. ISBN 0945466331.
Jump up ^ Wells, David A. (1890). Recent Economic Changes and Their Effect on Production and Distribution of Wealth and Well-Being of Society. New York: D. Appleton and Co. ISBN 0543724743. Opening line of the Preface.
Jump up ^ Beaudreau, Bernard C. (1996). Mass Production, the Stock Market Crash and the Great Depression. New York, Lincoln, Shanghi: Authors Choice Press.
Jump up ^ Lebergott, Stanley (1993). Pursuing Happiness: American Consumers in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. pp. a:Adapted from Fig. 9.1. ISBN 0691043221.
Jump up ^ http://www.ici.org/pdf/per02-02.pdf Stock Market Cycles 1942–1995
Jump up ^ Fighting Off Depression, New York Times, https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/05/opinion/05krugman.html
Jump up ^ A. F. Burns and W. C. Mitchell, Measuring business cycles, New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1946.
Jump up ^ A. F. Burns, Introduction. In: Wesley C. Mitchell, What happens during business cycles: A progress report. New York, National Bureau of Economic Research, 1951
Jump up ^ "US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions". NBER. Archived from the original on February 19, 2009. Retrieved 2009-02-20.
Jump up ^ Jan Tore Klovland http://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeexehis/v_3a46_3ay_3a2009_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a266-284.htm
Jump up ^ See, e.g. Korotayev, Andrey V., & Tsirel, Sergey V. A Spectral Analysis of World GDP Dynamics: Kondratieff Waves, Kuznets Swings, Juglar and Kitchin Cycles in Global Economic Development, and the 2008–2009 Economic Crisis. Structure and Dynamics. 2010. Vol. 4. no. 1. pp. 3–57.
Jump up ^ Mankiw, Gregory (1989). "Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective". The Journal of Economic Perspectives. JSTOR. 3 (3): 79–90. doi:10.1257/jep.3.3.79. ISSN 0895-3309. JSTOR 1942761.
Jump up ^ Schwartz, Anna J. (1987). Money in Historical Perspective. University of Chicago Press. pp. 24–77. ISBN 0226742288.
Jump up ^ Morgan, Mary S. (1990). The History of Econometric Ideas. New York: Cambridge University Press. pp. 15–130. ISBN 0521373980.
Jump up ^ Samuelson, P. A. (1939). "Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principle of acceleration". Review of Economic Statistics. 21 (2): 75–78. doi:10.2307/1927758. JSTOR 1927758.
Jump up ^ R. M. Goodwin (1967) "A Growth Cycle", in C.H. Feinstein, editor, Socialism, Capitalism and Economic Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Jump up ^ Perez, Carlota (2002). Technological Revolutions and Financial Capital: The Dynamics of Bubbles and Golden Ages. UK: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited. ISBN 1843763311.
Jump up ^ Vernon, R. (1966). "International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle". Quarterly Journal of Economics. 5: 22–26. doi:10.2307/1880689.
Jump up ^ Revyakin, G. (2017). "A new approach to the nature of economic cycles and their analysis in the global context". Eureka: Social and Humanities. 5: 27–37. doi:10.21303/2504-5571.2017.00425.
Jump up ^ • Allan Drazen, 2008. "political business cycles," The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. Abstract.
• William D. Nordhaus, 1975. "The Political Business Cycle," Review of Economic Studies, 42(2), pp. 169–190.
• _____, 1989:2. "Alternative Approaches to the Political Business Cycle," Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, p pp. 1–68.
Jump up ^ Kalecki, Michal. "Political Aspects of Full Employment". Retrieved 2 May 2012.
Jump up ^ Henryk Grossmann Das Akkumulations – und Zusammenbruchsgesetz des kapitalistischen Systems (Zugleich eine Krisentheorie), Hirschfeld, Leipzig, 1929
Jump up ^ Grossman, Henryk The Law of Accumulation and Breakdown of the Capitalist System. Pluto
Jump up ^ Paul Mattick, Marx and Keynes: The Limits of Mixed Economy, Boston, Porter Sargent, 1969
Jump up ^ Barbosa-Filho, Nelson H.; Taylor, Lance (2006). "Distributive and Demand Cycles in the US Economy – A Structuralist Goodwin Model". Metroeconomica. 57 (3): 389–411. doi:10.1111/j.1467-999x.2006.00250.x.
Jump up ^ Peter Flaschel, G. Kauermann, and T. Teuber, ‘Long Cycles in Employment, Inflation and Real Wage Costs’, American Journal of Applied Sciences Special Issue (2008): 69–77
Jump up ^ Mamadou Bobo Diallo et al., ‘Reconsidering the Dynamic Interaction Between Real Wages and Macroeconomic Activity’, Research in World Economy 2, no. 1 (April 2011)
Jump up ^ Reiner Franke, Peter Flaschel, and Christian R. Proaño, ‘Wage–price Dynamics and Income Distribution in a Semi-structural Keynes–Goodwin Model’, Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 17, no. 4 (December 2006): 452–465
Jump up ^ Cámara Izquierdo, Sergio (2013). "The cyclical decline of the profit rate as the cause of crises in the U.S. (1947–2011)". Review of Radical Political Economics. 45 (4): 459–467.
Jump up ^ Block, Walter; Garschina, Kenneth. "Hayek, Business Cycles and Fractional Reserve Banking: Continuing the De-Homogenization Process" (PDF). www.mises.org. Ludwig von Mises Institute. Retrieved 28 July 2014.
Jump up ^ Shostak, Dr. Frank. "Fractional Reserve banking and boom-bust cycles" (PDF). www.mises.org. Ludwig von Mises Institute. Retrieved 28 July 2014.
Jump up ^ Woods Jr., Thomas. "Can We Live Without the Fed?". www.lewrockwell.com. Lew Rockwell. Retrieved 27 July 2014.
Jump up ^ Woods Jr., Thomas. "Economic Cycles Before the Fed". www.youtube.com. Mises Media. Retrieved 27 July 2014.
Jump up ^ Friedman, Milton. "The Monetary Studies of the National Bureau, 44th Annual Report". The Optimal Quantity of Money and Other Essays. Chicago: Aldine. pp. 261–284.
Jump up ^ Friedman, Milton. "The 'Plucking Model' of Business Fluctuations Revisited". Economic Inquiry: 171–177.
Jump up ^ Keeler, JP. (2001). "Empirical Evidence on the Austrian Business Cycle Theory". Review of Austrian Economics. 14 (4): 331–51. doi:10.1023/A:1011937230775.
Jump up ^ Interview in Barron's Magazine, Aug. 24, 1998 archived at Hoover Institution "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 2013-12-31. Retrieved 2015-09-28.
Jump up ^ Nicholas Kaldor (1942). "Professor Hayek and the Concertina-Effect". Economica. 9 (36): 359–382. doi:10.2307/2550326. JSTOR 2550326.
Jump up ^ R. W. Garrison, "F. A. Hayek as 'Mr. Fluctooations:' In Defense of Hayek's 'Technical Economics'", Hayek Society Journal (LSE), 5(2), 1 (2003).
Jump up ^ Arturo Estrella & Frederic S. Mishkin, The Review of Economics & Statistics, Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators, 1998
Jump up ^ "List of Data Series Used to Construct the St. Louis Fed Financial Stress Index". The Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
Jump up ^ "Description of Components". Business Cycle Indicators. The Conference Board. Retrieved 2 March 2015.
Jump up ^ Arturo Estrella and Tobias Adrian, FRB of New York Staff Report No. 397, 2009
Jump up ^ "Announcement Dates". US Business Cycle Expansions and Contractions. NBER Business Cycle Dating Committee. Retrieved 1 March 2015.
Jump up ^ Arturo Estrella, FRB of New York Staff Report No. 421, 2010
Jump up ^ George, Henry. (1881). Progress and Poverty: An Inquiry into the Cause of Industrial Depressions and of Increase of Want with Increase of Wealth; The Remedy. Kegan Paul (reissued by Cambridge University Press, 2009; ISBN 978-1108003612)
Jump up ^ Hansen, Alvin H. Business Cycles and National Income. New York: W. W. Norton & Company, 1964, p. 39
Jump up ^ Ruhm, C (2000). "Are Recessions Good for Your Health?". Quarterly Journal of Economics. 115 (2): 617–650. doi:10.1162/003355300554872.
References[edit]
From (2008) The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition:
Christopher J. Erceg. "monetary business cycle models (sticky prices and wages)." Abstract.
Christian Hellwig. "monetary business cycles (imperfect information)." Abstract.
Ellen R. McGrattan "real business cycles." Abstract.
Eckstein, Otto; Sinai, Allen (1990). "1. The Mechanisms of the Business Cycle in the Postwar Period". In Robert J. Gordon. The American Business Cycle: Continuity and Change. University of Chicago Press. ISBN 978-0226304533.
Summers, Lawrence H. (1986). "Some Skeptical Observations on Real Business Cycle Theory" (PDF). Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis Quarterly Review. 10 (Fall): 23–27.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Business cycle.
Library resources about
Business cycle
Resources in your library
The Conference Board Business Cycle Indicators – Indicators of Euro Area, United States, Japan, China and so on.
Historical documents relating to past business cycles, including charts, data publications, speeches, and analyses
[show]
v
t
e
Aspects of capitalism (academic views)
General
Business cycle
Competition
Economic bubble
Economic development
Entrepreneurship
Ecoprenuership
Externalities
Financial Revolution
Globalization
History of capitalist theory
Industrial Revolution
Innovation
Invention
Market failure
Merit
Multinational corporation
Oligopoly
Privatization
Profit
Property rights
Regulation
Wage labour
Wealth
Ideology
American Dream
Bipartisanship
Democracy
Free market
Individualism
Laissez-faire
Liberalism
Libertarianism
Neoliberalism
Cultural aspects
Culture of capitalism
Advertising
Consumerism
Decentralization
Economic mobility
Liberty
Mainstream
Philanthropy
Private foundation
Rule of law
Social alienation
Spontaneous order
Social aspects
Economic inequality
Employment
Freedom of association
Labour market flexibility
Labour supply
Productivity
Prosperity
Social venture capital
Unemployment
Criticism
Criticism
Anti-capitalism
Market fundamentalism
Marxism
Wage slavery
Antithesis
Anarchism
Anarcho-syndicalism
Communism
Eco-socialism
Libertarian socialism
Mercantilism
Post-scarcity economy
Sharing economy
Social anarchism
Socialism
Syndicalism
[show]
v
t
e
Economics
Economic theory
Econometrics
Applied economics
Macroeconomics
Adaptive expectations
Aggregate demand
Balance of payments
Business cycle
Capacity utilization
Capital flight
Central bank
Consumer confidence
Currency
Demand shock
Depression (Great Depression)
DSGE
Economic growth
Economic indicator
Economic rent
Effective demand
General Theory of Keynes
Hyperinflation
Inflation
Interest
Interest rate
Investment
IS–LM model
Microfoundations
Monetary policy
Money
NAIRU
National accounts
PPP
Rate of profit
Rational expectations
Recession
Saving
Shrinkflation
Stagflation
Supply shock
Unemployment
Macroeconomics publications
Microeconomics
Aggregation problem
Budget set
Consumer choice
Convexity
Cost–benefit analysis
Deadweight loss
Distribution
Duopoly
Economic equilibrium
Economic shortage
Economic surplus
Economies of scale
Economies of scope
Elasticity
Expected utility hypothesis
Externality
General equilibrium theory
Indifference curve
Intertemporal choice
Marginal cost
Market failure
Market structure
Monopoly
Monopsony
Non-convexity
Oligopoly
Opportunity cost
Preference
Production set
Profit
Public good
Returns to scale
Risk aversion
Scarcity
Social choice theory
Sunk costs
Supply and demand
Theory of the firm
Trade
Transaction cost
Value
Uncertainty
Utility
Microeconomics publications
Applied fields
Agricultural
Business
Demographic
Development
Economic history
Education
Engineering
Environmental
Financial
Health
Industrial organization
International
Knowledge
Labour
Law and economics
Monetary
Natural resource
Public
Service
Transportation
Urban
Welfare
Methodology
Behavioral economics
Computational economics
Econometrics
Economic systems
Experimental economics
Mathematical economics
Methodological publications
Economic thought
Ancient economic thought
Austrian school of economics
Chicago school of economics
Classical economics
Feminist economics
Heterodox economics
Institutional economics
Keynesian economics
Mainstream economics
Marxian economics
Neoclassical economics
Post-Keynesian economics
Schools overview
Notable economists and
thinkers within economics
Kenneth Arrow
Gary Becker
Francis Ysidro Edgeworth
Milton Friedman
Ragnar Frisch
Friedrich Hayek
Harold Hotelling
John Maynard Keynes
Tjalling Koopmans
Paul Krugman
Robert Lucas Jr.
Jacob Marschak
Alfred Marshall
Karl Marx
John von Neumann
Vilfredo Pareto
David Ricardo
Paul Samuelson
Joseph Schumpeter
Amartya Sen
Herbert A. Simon
Adam Smith
Robert Solow
Léon Walras
more
International organizations
Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation
Economic Cooperation Organization
European Free Trade Association
International Monetary Fund
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development
World Bank
World Trade Organization
Category
Index
Lists
Outline
Publications
Business and economics portal
Authority control
GND: 4032125-3
NDL: 00565348
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Business_cycle&oldid=835428562"
Categories:
Business cycle
Business cycle theories
Capitalism
Hidden categories:
Pages with citations lacking titles
Pages with citations having bare URLs
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from February 2018
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from October 2016
All articles with vague or ambiguous time
Vague or ambiguous time from January 2014
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from January 2014
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2012
All articles that are too technical
Wikipedia articles that are too technical from April 2014
All articles needing expert attention
Articles needing expert attention from April 2014
Articles with unsourced statements from April 2014
All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2013
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010
Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Wikiquote
Languages
Afrikaans
العربية
বাংলা
Беларуская
Български
Čeština
Cymraeg
Dansk
Deutsch
Eesti
Español
Esperanto
Euskara
فارسی
Français
Galego
ગુજરાતી
한국어
हिन्दी
Ido
Italiano
ಕನ್ನಡ
Қазақша
Lietuvių
Magyar
Nederlands
日本語
Norsk
Polski
Português
Qaraqalpaqsha
Română
Русский
Slovenčina
Suomi
Svenska
Tagalog
தமிழ்
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
中文
33 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 8 April 2018, at 17:26.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

value: mw-page-base noprint

value: mw-head-base noprint

value: firstHeading firstHeading en

value: siteSub noprint

value: jump-to-nav mw-jump

value: padding:0.2em 0.4em 0.2em;font-size:145%;line-height:1.2em;background: none;

tag: br

tag: li

value: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;padding:0.15em 0.15em 0.25em; display:block; margin-bottom:0.55em; background-color: #efefef;

value: padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;padding:0.15em 0.25em 0.5em;

value: List of important publications in economics

value: padding:0.3em 0.4em 0.3em;font-weight:bold;background-color: #efefef;

value: float:right;clear:right;width:22.0em;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

value:
/wiki/Contraction_(economics)
mw-redirect
Contraction (economics)

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (October 2016)

value:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

value:
/wiki/Economic_crises
mw-redirect
Economic crises

value:
/wiki/Wealth_inequality
mw-redirect
Wealth inequality

value:
/wiki/Government_intervention
mw-redirect
Government intervention

value:
/wiki/Das_Kapital
mw-redirect
Das Kapital

value:
/wiki/Land_speculation
mw-redirect
Land speculation

value:
/wiki/Clement_Juglar
mw-redirect
Clement Juglar

value: The time period mentioned near this tag is ambiguous. (January 2014)

value: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

value:
/wiki/Template:Economic_Waves
mw-redirect
Template:Economic Waves

value:
/wiki/Template_talk:Economic_Waves
mw-redirect
Template talk:Economic Waves

value: The material near this tag may use weasel words or too-vague attribution. (January 2014)

value: Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch

value: Edit section: Accurate classification of business cycles

value: Productivity improving technologies (historical)

value:
/wiki/Napoleonic_wars
mw-redirect
Napoleonic wars

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2012)

value:
/wiki/Golden_Age_of_Capitalism
mw-redirect
Golden Age of Capitalism

value:
/wiki/Late-2000s_recession
mw-redirect
Late-2000s recession

value:
/wiki/Automatic_stabilization
mw-redirect
Automatic stabilization

value:
/wiki/The_Great_Moderation
mw-redirect
The Great Moderation

value:
/wiki/Robert_Lucas,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Robert Lucas, Jr.

value:
/wiki/Command_economies
mw-redirect
Command economies

value:
/wiki/Market_economies
mw-redirect
Market economies

attr: alt src width height class data-file-width data-file-height

value: Edit section: Upper turning points of business cycle, commodity prices and freight rates

value: Edit section: Spectral analysis of business cycles

value: The material near this tag may be using jargon that limits the article's accessibility. (April 2014)

value:
/wiki/Real_business_cycle_theory
mw-redirect
Real business cycle theory

value:
/wiki/Financial_instability_hypothesis
mw-redirect
Financial instability hypothesis

value:
/wiki/Laissez_faire
mw-redirect
Laissez faire

value:
/wiki/Keynesian_revolution
mw-redirect
Keynesian revolution

value:
/wiki/Real_business_cycle
mw-redirect
Real business cycle

value:
/wiki/Speculative_bubble
mw-redirect
Speculative bubble

value:
/wiki/Financial_Instability_Hypothesis
mw-redirect
Financial Instability Hypothesis

value: Edit section: Real business cycle theory

value:
/wiki/Real_Business_Cycle_theory
mw-redirect
Real Business Cycle theory

value:
/wiki/Freshwater_economics
mw-redirect
Freshwater economics

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (April 2014)

value: Edit section: Product based theory of economic cycles

value:
/wiki/Kondratiev_waves
mw-redirect
Kondratiev waves

value:
/wiki/Juglar_cycles
mw-redirect
Juglar cycles

value:
/wiki/Consumer_goods
mw-redirect
Consumer goods

value: Edit section: Politically based business cycle

value: The material near this tag possibly uses too-vague attribution or weasel words. (April 2013)

value:
/wiki/Crisis_(Marxian)
mw-redirect
Crisis (Marxian)

value:
/wiki/Goodwin_Model
mw-redirect
Goodwin Model

value:
/wiki/Fractional_reserve_banking
mw-redirect
Fractional reserve banking

value:
/wiki/Austrian_Business_Cycle_Theory
mw-redirect
Austrian Business Cycle Theory

value:
headerSort
0
columnheader button
Sort ascending

value: Edit section: Mitigating an economic downturn

value:
/wiki/New_classical_economics
mw-redirect
New classical economics

value:
/wiki/Keynesian_theory
mw-redirect
Keynesian theory

value:
/wiki/Crises_(economic)
mw-redirect
Crises (economic)

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2010)

value: List of financial crises in the United States

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1927031

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1927031

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1928486

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1928486

value:
nofollow
external free
http://www.ici.org/pdf/per02-02.pdf

value:
nofollow
https://www.nber.org/cycles/
external text

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1257%2Fjep.3.3.79

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/issn/0895-3309

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1942761

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1927758

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/1927758

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F1880689

value:
nofollow
external text
http://eu-jr.eu/social/article/view/425

value: The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics

value:
/wiki/William_D._Nordhaus
mw-redirect
William D. Nordhaus

value:
nofollow
external text
https://www.jstor.org/pss/2534461

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1023%2FA%3A1011937230775

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.2307%2F2550326

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.jstor.org/stable/2550326

value:
plainlist
padding:0 0.1em 0.4em;text-align:left;

value: float:right;clear:right;width:auto;margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em;background:#f9f9f9;border:1px solid #aaa;padding:0.2em;border-spacing:0.4em 0;text-align:center;line-height:1.4em;font-size:88%

value:
nofollow
external text
https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/theme/5

value: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value:
/wiki/Economic_theory
mw-redirect
Economic theory

value: The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money

value:
/wiki/Austrian_school_of_economics
mw-redirect
Austrian school of economics

value: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

value: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

value:
nofollow
external text
https://d-nb.info/gnd/4032125-3

value: Category:Pages with citations lacking titles

value: Category:Pages with citations having bare URLs

value: Category:All articles with dead external links

value: Category:Articles with dead external links from February 2018

value: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from October 2016

value: Category:All articles with vague or ambiguous time

value: Category:Vague or ambiguous time from January 2014

value: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from January 2014

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2012

value: Category:All articles that are too technical

value: Category:Wikipedia articles that are too technical from April 2014

value: Category:All articles needing expert attention

value: Category:Articles needing expert attention from April 2014

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from April 2014

value: Category:All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases

value: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from April 2013

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2010

value: Category:Wikipedia articles with GND identifiers

value: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

value: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

value:
/wiki/Business_cycle
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

value: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

value: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

value: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

value: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

value: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

value: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

value:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

value: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

value: Permanent link to this revision of the page

value: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

value: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

value: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-af
display: none;

value: دورة اقتصادية – Arabic

value: অর্থনৈতিক চক্র – Bangla

value: Кан’юктура – Belarusian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-be
display: none;

value: Бизнес цикъл – Bulgarian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cy
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-da
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-et
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eo
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

value: چرخه کسب‌وکار – Persian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gl
display: none;

value: વ્યાપાર ચક્ર – Gujarati

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-gu
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

value: व्यापार चक्र – Hindi

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-io
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-it
display: none;

value: ಆರ್ಥಿಕ ಆವರ್ತಗಳು – Kannada

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kn
display: none;

value: Экономикалық Цикл – Kazakh

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-lt
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ja
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-kaa
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

value: Экономические циклы – Russian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tl
display: none;

value: வணிகச்சுழல் – Tamil

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

value: Економічний цикл – Ukrainian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

value: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

value: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

value: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

value:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

value: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Business_cycle rootpage-Business_cycle skin-vector action-view