text:
Environmental impact of aviation
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
A C-141 Starlifter leaves contrails over Antarctica.
The environmental impact of aviation occurs because aircraft engines emit heat, noise, particulates, and gases which contribute to climate change[1][2] and global dimming.[3] Airplanes emit particles and gases such as carbon dioxide (CO2), water vapor, hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides, lead, and black carbon which interact among themselves and with the atmosphere.[4]
Despite emission reductions from automobiles and more fuel-efficient and less polluting turbofan and turboprop engines, the rapid growth of air travel in the past years contributes to an increase in total pollution attributable to aviation. From 1992 to 2005, passenger kilometers increased 5.2% per year. And in the European Union, greenhouse gas emissions from aviation increased by 87% between 1990 and 2006.[5]
Comprehensive research shows that despite anticipated efficiency innovations to airframes, engines, aerodynamics and flight operations, there is no end in sight, even many decades out, to rapid growth in CO2 emissions from air travel and air freight,[6][7] due to projected continual growth in air travel.[8][9] This is because international aviation emissions have escaped international regulation up to the ICAO triennial conference in October 2016 agreed on the CORSIA offset scheme,[citation needed] and because of the lack of taxes on aviation fuel worldwide, lower fares become more frequent than otherwise, which gives a competitive advantage over other transportation modes.[citation needed] Unless market constraints are put in place, this growth in aviation's emissions will result in the sector's emissions amounting to all or nearly all of the annual global CO2 emissions budget by mid-century, if climate change is to be held to a temperature increase of 2 °C or less.[10]
There is an ongoing debate about possible taxation of air travel and the inclusion of aviation in an emissions trading scheme, with a view to ensuring that the total external costs of aviation are taken into account.[11]
Contents
[hide]
1 Climate change
1.1 Mechanisms and cumulative effects of aviation on climate
1.1.1 Carbon dioxide (CO2)
1.1.2 Oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
1.1.3 Water vapor (H2O), and contrails
1.1.4 Particulates
1.2 Greenhouse gas emissions per passenger kilometre
1.2.1 Averaged emissions
1.2.2 Emissions by passenger class, and effects of seating configuration
1.3 Total climate effects
1.4 Future emission levels
1.4.1 Continual increases in travel and freight
1.5 Scope for improvement
1.5.1 Aircraft efficiency
1.5.2 Operations efficiency
1.5.3 Alternative fuels
1.6 Reducing air travel
1.6.1 Personal choices and social pressure
1.6.2 Business and professional choices
1.6.3 Ending incentives to fly—frequent flyer programs
1.6.4 Potential for governmental constraints on demand
1.7 International regulation of air travel GHG emissions
1.7.1 Kyoto Protocol 2005
1.7.2 Approaches toward emissions trading
1.7.3 International Civil Aviation Organization agreement 2016
1.8 Effects of climate change on aviation
1.8.1 Increased turbulence
2 Noise
3 Water pollution
4 Air quality
4.1 Particulate Emissions
4.2 Lead emissions
5 Radiation exposure
6 See also
7 Notes and references
8 External links
Climate change[edit]
Radiative forcings from aviation emissions (gases and aerosols) in 1992 as estimated by the IPCC
Like all human activities involving combustion, most forms of aviation release carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gases into the Earth's atmosphere, contributing to the acceleration of global warming[12] and (in the case of CO2) ocean acidification.[13] These concerns are highlighted by the present volume of commercial aviation and its rate of growth. Globally, about 8.3 million people fly daily (3 billion occupied seats per year), twice the total in 1999.[14] U.S. airlines alone burned about 16.2 billion gallons of fuel during the twelve months between October 2013 and September 2014.[15]
In addition to the CO2 released by most aircraft in flight through the burning of fuels such as Jet-A (turbine aircraft) or Avgas (piston aircraft), the aviation industry also contributes greenhouse gas emissions from ground airport vehicles and those used by passengers and staff to access airports, as well as through emissions generated by the production of energy used in airport buildings, the manufacture of aircraft and the construction of airport infrastructure.[16]
While the principal greenhouse gas emission from powered aircraft in flight is CO2, other emissions may include nitric oxide and nitrogen dioxide (together termed oxides of nitrogen or NOx), water vapour and particulates (soot and sulfate particles), sulfur oxides, carbon monoxide (which bonds with oxygen to become CO2 immediately upon release), incompletely burned hydrocarbons, tetraethyllead (piston aircraft only), and radicals such as hydroxyl, depending on the type of aircraft in use.[17] Emissions weighting factor (EWFs) i.e., the factor by which aviation CO2 emissions should be multiplied to get the CO2-equivalent emissions for annual fleet average conditions is in the range 1.3–2.9.[18]
Mechanisms and cumulative effects of aviation on climate[edit]
In 1999 the contribution of civil aircraft-in-flight to global CO2 emissions was estimated to be around 2%.[17] However, in the case of high-altitude airliners which frequently fly near or in the stratosphere, non-CO2 altitude-sensitive effects may increase the total impact on anthropogenic (human-made) climate change significantly.[17] A 2007 report from Environmental Change Institute / Oxford University posits a range closer to 4 percent cumulative effect.[19] Subsonic aircraft-in-flight contribute to climate change[17] in four ways:
Carbon dioxide (CO2)[edit]
CO2 emissions from aircraft-in-flight are the most significant and best understood[20] element of aviation's total contribution to climate change. The level and effects of CO2 emissions are currently believed to be broadly the same regardless of altitude (i.e. they have the same atmospheric effects as ground based emissions). In 1992, emissions of CO2 from aircraft were estimated at around 2% of all such anthropogenic emissions, and that year the atmospheric concentration of CO2 attributable to aviation was around 1% of the total anthropogenic increase since the industrial revolution, having accumulated primarily over just the last 50 years.[21]
Oxides of nitrogen (NOx)[edit]
At the high altitudes flown by large jet airliners around the tropopause, emissions of NOx are particularly effective in forming ozone (O3) in the upper troposphere. High altitude (8–13 km) NOx emissions result in greater concentrations of O3 than surface NOx emissions, and these in turn have a greater global warming effect. The effect of O3 concentrations are regional and local (as opposed to CO2 emissions, which are global).[citation needed]
NOx emissions also reduce ambient levels of methane, another greenhouse gas, resulting in a climate cooling effect. But this effect does not offset the O3 forming effect of NOx emissions. It is now believed that aircraft sulfur and water emissions in the stratosphere tend to deplete O3, partially offsetting the NOx-induced O3 increases. These effects have not been quantified.[21] This problem does not apply to aircraft that fly lower in the troposphere, such as light aircraft or many commuter aircraft.
Water vapor (H2O), and contrails[edit]
Contrails
Cirrus cloud formation
One of the products of burning hydrocarbons in oxygen is water vapour, a greenhouse gas. Water vapour produced by aircraft engines at high altitude, under certain atmospheric conditions, condenses into droplets to form Condensation trails, or contrails. Contrails are visible line clouds that form in cold, humid atmospheres and are thought to have a global warming effect (though one less significant than either CO2 emissions or NOx induced effects).[22] Contrails are uncommon (though by no means rare) from lower-altitude aircraft, or from propeller-driven aircraft or rotorcraft.
Cirrus clouds have been observed to develop after the persistent formation of contrails and have been found to have a global warming effect over-and-above that of contrail formation alone. There is a degree of scientific uncertainty about the contribution of contrail and cirrus cloud formation to global warming and attempts to estimate aviation's overall climate change contribution do not tend to include its effects on cirrus cloud enhancement.[20] However, a 2015 study found that artificial cloudiness caused by contrail "outbreaks" reduce the difference between daytime and nighttime temperatures. The former are decreased and the latter are increased, in comparison to temperatures the day before and the day after such outbreaks.[23] On days with outbreaks the day/night temperature difference was diminished by about 6F° in the U.S. South and 5F° in the Midwest.[24]
Particulates[edit]
Least significant on a mass basis is the release of soot and sulfate particles. Soot absorbs heat and has a warming effect; sulfate particles reflect radiation and have a small cooling effect. In addition, particles can influence the formation and properties of clouds,[25] including both line-shaped contrails and naturally-occurring cirrus clouds. The impact of "spreading contrails and cirrus clouds that evolve from them -- collectively known as contrail cirrus -- have a greater radiative forcing (RF) today than all aviation CO2 emissions since the first powered airplane flight".[26] Of the particles emitted by aircraft engines, the soot particles are thought to be most important for contrail formation since they are large enough to serve as condensation nuclei for water vapor. All aircraft powered by combustion will release some amount of soot; although, recent studies suggest that reducing the aromatic content of jet fuel decreases the amount of soot produced.[27][28][29]
Greenhouse gas emissions per passenger kilometre[edit]
Averaged emissions[edit]
Emissions of passenger aircraft per passenger kilometre vary extensively because of differing factors such as the size and type aircraft, the altitude and the percentage of passenger or freight capacity of a particular flight, and the distance of the journey and number of stops en route. Also, the effect of a given amount of emissions on climate (radiative forcing) is greater at higher altitudes: see below. Some representative figures for CO2 emissions are provided by LIPASTO's survey of average direct emissions (not accounting for high-altitude radiative effects) of airliners expressed as CO2 and CO2 equivalent per passenger kilometre:[30]
Domestic, short distance, less than 463 km (288 mi): 257 g/km CO2 or 259 g/km (14.7 oz/mile) CO2e
Domestic, long distance, greater than 463 km (288 mi): 177 g/km CO2 or 178 g/km (10.1 oz/mile) CO2e
Long distance flights: 113 g/km CO2 or 114 g/km (6.5 oz/mile) CO2e
These emissions are similar to a four-seat car with one person on board;[31] however, flying trips often cover longer distances than would be undertaken by car, so the total emissions are much higher. For perspective, per passenger a typical economy-class New York to Los Angeles round trip produces about 715 kg (1574 lb) of CO2 (but is equivalent to 1,917 kg (4,230 lb) of CO2 when the high altitude "climatic forcing" effect is taken into account).[32] Within the categories of flights above, emissions from scheduled jet flights are substantially higher than turboprop or chartered jet flights. About 60% of aviation emissions arise from international flights, and these flights are not covered by the Kyoto Protocol and its emissions reduction targets.[33] However, in a more recent development:
The United Nations’ aviation arm overwhelmingly ratified an agreement Thursday (06.Oct.2016) to control global warming emissions from international airline flights, the first climate-change pact to set worldwide limits on a single industry. The agreement, adopted overwhelmingly by the 191-nation International Civil Aviation Organization at a meeting in Montreal, sets airlines’ carbon emissions in the year 2020 as the upper limit of what carriers are allowed to discharge.[34]
Figures from British Airways suggest carbon dioxide emissions of 100g per passenger kilometre for large jet airliners (a figure which does not account for the production of other pollutants or condensation trails).[35]
Emissions by passenger class, and effects of seating configuration[edit]
In 2013 the World Bank published a study of the effect on CO2 emissions of its staff's travel in business class or first class, versus using economy class.[36] Among the factors considered was that these premium classes displace proportionately more economy seats for the same total aircraft space capacity, and the associated differing load factors and weight factors. This was not accounted for in prior standard carbon accounting methods. The study concluded that when considering respective average load factors (percent of occupied seats) in each of the seating classes, the carbon footprints of business class and first class are three-times and nine-times higher than economy class.[36][37][38] A related article by the International Council on Clean Transport notes further regarding the effect of seating configurations on carbon emissions that:[38]
The A380 is marketed as a "green giant" and one of the most environmentally advanced aircraft out there. But that spin is based on a maximum-capacity aircraft configuration, or about 850 economy passengers. In reality, a typical A380 aircraft has 525 seats. Its fuel performance is comparable to that of a B747-400 ER and even about 15% worse than a B777-300ER on a passenger-mile basis (calculated using Piano-5 on a flight from AUH to LHR, assuming an 80% passenger load factor, and in-service fleet average seat counts).
Total climate effects[edit]
In attempting to aggregate and quantify the total climate impact of aircraft emissions the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has estimated that aviation's total climate impact is some 2–4 times that of its direct CO2 emissions alone (excluding the potential impact of cirrus cloud enhancement).[17] This is measured as radiative forcing. While there is uncertainty about the exact level of impact of NOx and water vapour, governments have accepted the broad scientific view that they do have an effect. Globally in 2005, aviation contributed "possibly as much as 4.9% of radiative forcing."[33] UK government policy statements have stressed the need for aviation to address its total climate change impacts and not simply the impact of CO2.[39]
The IPCC has estimated that aviation is responsible for around 3.5% of anthropogenic climate change, a figure which includes both CO2 and non-CO2 induced effects. The IPCC has produced scenarios estimating what this figure could be in 2050. The central case estimate is that aviation's contribution could grow to 5% of the total contribution by 2050 if action is not taken to tackle these emissions, though the highest scenario is 15%.[17] Moreover, if other industries achieve significant cuts in their own greenhouse gas emissions, aviation's share as a proportion of the remaining emissions could also rise.
Future emission levels[edit]
Even though there have been significant improvements in fuel efficiency through aircraft technology and operational management as described here, these improvements are being continually eclipsed by the increase in air traffic volume.
A December 2015 report finds that aircraft could generate 7013430000000000000♠43 Gt of carbon pollution through to 2050, consuming almost 5% of the remaining global climate budget. Without regulation, global aviation emissions may triple by mid-century and could emit more than 7012300000000000000♠3 Gt of carbon annually under a high-growth, business-as-usual scenario. Efforts to bring aviation emissions under an effective global accord have so far largely failed, despite there being a number of technological and operational improvements on offer.[40][41]
Continual increases in travel and freight[edit]
From 1992 to 2005, passenger kilometers increased 5.2% per year, even with the disruptions of 9/11 and two significant wars. Since the onset of the current recession:
During the first three quarters of 2010, air travel markets expanded at an annualized rate approaching 10%. This is similar to the rate seen in the rapid expansion prior to the recession. November's results mean the annualized rate of growth so far in Q4 drops back to around 6%. But this is still in line with long run rates of traffic growth seen historically. The level of international air travel is now 4% above the pre-recession peak of early 2008 and the current expansion looks to have further to run.[42]
Air freight reached a new high point in May (2010) but, following the end of inventory restocking activity, volumes have slipped back to settle at a similar level seen just before the onset of recession. Even so, that means an expansion of air freight during 2010 of 5–6% on an annualized basis – close to historical trend. With the stimulus of inventory restocking activity removed, further growth in air freight demand will be driven by end consumer demand for goods which utilize the air transport supply chain. ... The end of the inventory cycle does not mean the end of volume expansion but markets are entering a slower growth phase.[42]
In a 2008 presentation[12] and paper [43] Professor Kevin Anderson of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research showed how continued aviation growth in the UK threatens the ability of that nation to meet CO2 emission reduction goals necessary to contain the century-end temperature increase to even 4 or 6C°. (See also: the 4 Degrees and Beyond International Climate Conference (2009)[44] and its proceedings.)[45] His charts show the projected domestic aviation carbon emission increase for the UK as growing from 11 MT in 2006 to 17 MT in 2012, at the UK's historic annual emission growth rate of 7%. Beyond 2012 if the growth rate were reduced to 3% yearly, carbon emissions in 2030 would be 28 MT, which is 70% of the UK's entire carbon emissions budget that year for all sectors of society. This work also suggests the foreseeable future which confronts many other nations that have high dependency on aviation. "Hypermobile Travelers",[46] an academic study by Stefan Gössling et al. (2009) in the book "Climate Change and Aviation",[47] also points to the dilemma caused by the increasing hypermobility of air travelers both in particular nations and globally.[48]
Scope for improvement[edit]
Aircraft efficiency[edit]
While it is true that late model jet aircraft are significantly more fuel efficient (and thus emit less CO2 in particular) than the earliest jet airliners,[49][50] new airliner models in the 2000s were barely more efficient on a seat-mile basis than the latest piston-powered airliners of the late 1950s (e.g. Constellation L-1649-A and DC-7C).[50] Claims for a high gain in efficiency for airliners over recent decades (while true in part) has been biased high in most studies, by using the early inefficient models of jet airliners as a baseline. Those aircraft were optimized for increased revenue, including increased speed and cruising altitude, and were quite fuel inefficient in comparison to their piston-powered forerunners.[50]
Today, turboprop aircraft – probably in part because of their lower cruising speeds and altitudes (similar to the earlier piston-powered airliners) compared to jet airliners – play an obvious role in the overall fuel efficiency of major airlines that have regional carrier subsidiaries.[51] For example, although Alaska Airlines scored at the top of a 2011–2012 fuel efficiency ranking, if its large regional carrier – turbo-prop equipped Horizon Air – were dropped from the lumped-in consideration, the airline's ranking would be somewhat lower, as noted in the ranking study.
Aircraft manufacturers are striving for reductions in both CO2 and NOx emissions with each new generation of design of aircraft and engine.[52] While the introduction of more modern aircraft represents an opportunity to reduce emissions per passenger kilometre flown, aircraft are major investments that endure for many decades, and replacement of the international fleet is therefore a long-term proposition which will greatly delay realizing the climate benefits of many kinds of improvements. Engines can be changed at some point, but nevertheless airframes have a long life.[citation needed] Moreover, rather than being linear from one year to the next the improvements to efficiency tend to diminish over time, as reflected in the histories of both piston and jet powered aircraft.[50]
A 2014 life-cycle assessment of the cradle-to-grave reduction in CO2 by a carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) airliner such as a Boeing 787 – including its manufacture, operations and eventual disposal – has shown that by 2050 such aircraft could reduce the airline industry's CO2 emissions by 14–15%, compared use of conventional airliners.[53] The benefit of CFRP technology is not higher than that amount of reduction, despite the lighter weight and substantially lower fuel consumption of such aircraft, "because of the limited fleet penetration by 2050 and the increased demand for air travel due to lower operating costs." [53]
Operations efficiency[edit]
Research projects such as Boeing's ecoDemonstrator program have sought to identify ways of improving the efficiency of commercial aircraft operations. The U.S. government has encouraged such research through grant programs, including the FAA's Continuous Lower Energy, Emissions and Noise (CLEEN) program, and NASA's Environmentally Responsible Aviation (ERA) Project.
Adding an electric drive to the airplane's nose wheel may improve fuel efficiency during ground handling. This addition would allow taxiing without the use of the main engines.[54][55][56]
Another proposed change is the integrating of an Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System to the airstrips of airports. Some companies such as Airbus are currently researching this possibility. The adding of EMALS would allow the civilian aircraft to use considerably less fuel (as a lot of fuel is used during take off, in comparison to cruising, when calculated per km flown). The idea is to have the aircraft take off at regular aircraft speed, and only use the catapult for take-off, not for landing.[57][58]
Other opportunities arise from the optimization of airline timetables, route networks and flight frequencies to increase load factors (minimize the number of empty seats flown),[59] together with the optimization of airspace. However, these are each one-time gains, and as these opportunities are successively fulfilled, diminishing returns can be expected from the remaining opportunities.
Another possible reduction of the climate-change impact is the limitation of cruise altitude of aircraft. This would lead to a significant reduction in high-altitude contrails for a marginal trade-off of increased flight time and an estimated 4% increase in CO2 emissions. Drawbacks of this solution include very limited airspace capacity to do this, especially in Europe and North America and increased fuel burn because jet aircraft are less efficient at lower cruise altitudes.[60]
While they are not suitable for long-haul or transoceanic flights, turboprop aircraft used for commuter flights bring two significant benefits: they often burn considerably less fuel per passenger mile, and they typically fly at lower altitudes, well inside the tropopause, where there are no concerns about ozone or contrail production.
Alternative fuels[edit]
Main article: Aviation_fuel § Chemical_composition
Main article: Aviation_fuel § LNG
Some scientists and companies such as GE Aviation and Virgin Fuels are researching biofuel technology for use in jet aircraft.[61] Some aircraft engines, like the Wilksch WAM120 can (being a 2-stroke Diesel engine) run on straight vegetable oil. Also, a number of Lycoming engines run well on ethanol.
In addition, there are also several tests done combining regular petrofuels with a biofuel. For example, as part of this test Virgin Atlantic Airways flew a Boeing 747 from London Heathrow Airport to Amsterdam Schiphol Airport on 24 February 2008, with one engine burning a combination of coconut oil and babassu oil.[61] Greenpeace's chief scientist Doug Parr said that the flight was "high-altitude greenwash" and that producing organic oils to make biofuel could lead to deforestation and a large increase in greenhouse gas emissions.[61] Also, the majority of the world's aircraft are not large jetliners but smaller piston aircraft, and with major modifications many are capable of using ethanol as a fuel.[62] Another consideration is the vast amount of land that would be necessary to provide the biomass feedstock needed to support the needs of aviation, both civil and military.[63]
In December 2008, an Air New Zealand jet completed the world's first commercial aviation test flight partially using jatropha-based fuel. Jatropha, used for biodiesel, can thrive on marginal agricultural land where many trees and crops won't grow, or would produce only slow growth yields.[64][65] Air New Zealand set several general sustainability criteria for its Jatropha, saying that such biofuels must not compete with food resources, that they must be as good as traditional jet fuels, and that they should be cost competitive with existing fuels.[66]
In January 2009, Continental Airlines used a sustainable biofuel to power a commercial aircraft for the first time in North America. This marks the first sustainable biofuel demonstration flight by a commercial carrier using a twin-engined aircraft, a Boeing 737-800, powered by CFM International CFM56-7B engines. The biofuel blend included components derived from algae and jatropha plants.[67]
One fuel biofuel alternative to avgas that is under development is Swift Fuel. Swift fuel was approved as a test fuel by ASTM International in December 2009, allowing the company to continue their research and to pursue certification testing. Mary Rusek, president and co-owner of Swift Enterprises predicted at that time that "100SF will be comparably priced, environmentally friendlier and more fuel-efficient than other general aviation fuels on the market".[68][69]
As of June 2011, revised international aviation fuel standards officially allow commercial airlines to blend conventional jet fuel with up to 50 percent biofuels. The renewable fuels "can be blended with conventional commercial and military jet fuel through requirements in the newly issued edition of ASTM D7566, Specification for Aviation Turbine Fuel Containing Synthesized Hydrocarbons".[70]
In December 2011, the FAA announced it is awarding $7.7 million to eight companies to advance the development of drop-in commercial aviation biofuels, with a special focus on ATJ (alcohol to jet) fuel. As part of its CAAFI (Commercial Aviation Alternative Fuel Initiative) and CLEEN (Continuous Lower Emissions, Energy and Noise) programs, the FAA plans to assist in the development of a sustainable fuel (from alcohols, sugars, biomass, and organic matter such as pyrolysis oils) that can be "dropped in" to aircraft without changing current infrastructure. The grant will also be used to research how the fuels affect engine durability and quality control standards.[71]
Finally, liquified natural gas is another fuel that is used in some airplanes. Besides the lower GHG emissions (depending from where the natural gas was obtained from), another major benefit to airplane operators is the price, which is far lower than the price for jet fuel.
Reducing air travel[edit]
Personal choices and social pressure[edit]
The German video short The Bill[72] explores how travel and its impacts are commonly viewed in everyday developed-world life, and the social pressures that are at play. British writer George Marshall has investigated common rationalizations that act as barriers to making personal choices to travel less, or to justify recent trips. In an informal research project, "one you are welcome to join", he says, he deliberately steered conversations with people who are attuned to climate change problems to questions about recent long-distance flights and why the travel was justified. Reflecting on actions contrary to their beliefs, he noted, "(i)ntriguing as their dissonance may be, what is especially revealing is that every one of these people has a career that is predicated on the assumption that information is sufficient to generate change – an assumption that a moment's introspection would show them was deeply flawed."[73]
Business and professional choices[edit]
With most international conferences having hundreds if not thousands of participants, and the bulk of these usually traveling by plane, conference travel is an area where significant reductions in air-travel-related GHG emissions could be made. ... This does not mean non-attendance. (Reay 2004)[74]
For example, by 2003 Access Grid technology has already been successfully used to host several international conferences,[74] and technology has likely progressed substantially since then. The Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research has been systematically studying means to change common institutional and professional practices that have led to large carbon footprints of travel by research scientists, and issued a report. (Le Quéré et al. 2015).[75][76][77]
Ending incentives to fly—frequent flyer programs[edit]
Over 130 airlines have "frequent flyer programs" based at least in part on miles, kilometers, points or segments for flights taken. Globally, such programs included about 163 million people as reported in 2006.[78] These programs benefit airlines by habituating people to air travel and, through the mechanics of partnerships with credit card companies and other businesses, in which high profit margin revenue streams can amount to selling free seats for a high price.[78] The only part of United Airlines business that was making money when the company filed for bankruptcy in 2002 was its frequent flyer program.[78]
Concerning business travel, "The ease of international air travel and the fact that, for most of us, the costs are met by our employers, means that ... globe trotting conference travel is often regarded as a perk of the job."[74] However, the perk usually is not only the business trip itself, but also the frequent flyer points which the individual accrues by taking the trip, and which can be redeemed later for personal air travel. Thus a conflict of interest is established, whereby bottom-up pressure may be created within a firm or government agency for travel that is really not necessary. Even when such conflict is not a motivation, the perk of frequent flyer miles can be expected to lead in many cases to personal trips that would not be taken if a ticket had to be paid for with personal funds.[79]
By just using an airline-sponsored credit card to pay one's household expenses, personal or business bills, or even expense bills charged to an employer, frequent flyer points can be racked up quickly.[78] Thus, free travel—for which the individual has to pay nothing extra—becomes a reality. Across society, this too can be expected to lead to much air travel—and greenhouse gas emissions—that otherwise would not occur.[80]
Several studies have contemplated the elimination of frequent flyer programmes (FFPs), on the grounds of anti-competitiveness,[81] ethics,[82] conflict with society's overall well-being,[83] or climate effects.[84] There is a record of governments disallowing or banning FFPs and of industry players requesting bans. Denmark did not allow the programs until 1992, then changing its policy because its airlines were disadvantaged.[81] In 2002, Norway banned domestic FFPs in order to promote competition among its airlines.[85] In the U.S. in 1989, a vice president of Braniff "said the government should consider ordering an end to frequent-flyer programs, which he said allow unfair competition."[86]
A Canadian study said that because of competition no airline could unilaterally end its FFP, but that a national government could use its regulatory power to end the programs broadly, which in Canada's case would also require North America-wide cooperation.[83] In further analysis, a Scandinavian study which recommended an end to frequent flyer plans said, "the only possible way of prohibiting FFPs successfully now that they have spread from the US to Europe to the Far East would be to do so on a global basis. The basis exists: it could be done by the World Trade Organization."[81] A recent study which surveyed frequent flyers in the U.K. and Norway, looked into behavioral addition to frequent flying and the "flyer's dilemma" of the conflict between "the social and personal benefits of flying and air travel's impact on climate change."[84] It concluded that:
Continued growth in both frequent flying practices and concern over air travel's climate impacts are in a dynamic relationship and the question of whether one or the other will reach a tipping point cannot yet be determined. Self-regulation, external regulation, social norms, technology and physical resources will continue to co-constitute the balance. An increasing stigmatisation of 'excessive' air travel may (re)frame flying as more open to collective external mitigation.[84]
This means government action.
Potential for governmental constraints on demand[edit]
One means for reducing the environmental impact of aviation is to constrain demand for air travel, through increased fares in place of expanded airport capacity. Several studies have explored this:
The UK study Predict and Decide – Aviation, climate change and UK policy, notes that a 10% increase in fares generates a 5% to 15% reduction in demand, and recommends that the British government should manage demand rather than provide for it.[87] This would be accomplished via a strategy that presumes "… against the expansion of UK airport capacity" and constrains demand by the use of economic instruments to price air travel less attractively.[88]
A study published by the campaign group Aviation Environment Federation (AEF) concludes that by levying £9 billion of additional taxes, the annual rate of growth in demand in the UK for air travel would be reduced to 2%.[89]
The ninth report of the House of Commons Environmental Audit Select Committee, published in July 2006, recommends that the British government rethinks its airport expansion policy and considers ways, particularly via increased taxation, in which future demand can be managed in line with industry performance in achieving fuel efficiencies, so that emissions are not allowed to increase in absolute terms.[90]
International regulation of air travel GHG emissions[edit]
Kyoto Protocol 2005[edit]
Greenhouse gas emissions from fuel consumption in international aviation, in contrast to those from domestic aviation and from energy use by airports, are excluded from the scope of the first period (2008–2012) of the Kyoto Protocol, as are the non-CO2 climate effects. Instead, governments agreed to work through the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to limit or reduce emissions and to find a solution to the allocation of emissions from international aviation in time for the second period of the Kyoto Protocol starting from 2009; however, the Copenhagen climate conference failed to reach an agreement.[91]
Recent research points to this failure as a substantial obstacle to global policy including a CO2 emissions reduction pathway that would avoid dangerous climate change by keeping the increase in the average global temperature below a 2 °C rise.[92][93][94]
Approaches toward emissions trading[edit]
As part of that process the ICAO has endorsed the adoption of an open emissions trading system to meet CO2 emissions reduction objectives. Guidelines for the adoption and implementation of a global scheme are currently being developed, and will be presented to the ICAO Assembly in 2007,[95] although the prospects of a comprehensive inter-governmental agreement on the adoption of such a scheme are uncertain.
Within the European Union, however, the European Commission has resolved to incorporate aviation in the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).[96] A new directive was adopted by the European Parliament in July 2008 and approved by the Council in October 2008. It became effective on 1 January 2012.[97]
Researchers at the Overseas Development Institute investigated the possible effects on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) of the European Union's decision to limit the supply of Certified Emission Reductions (CERs) to its ETS market to Least Developed Countries (LDCs) from 2013.[98] Most SIDS are highly vulnerable to the effects of climate change and rely heavily on tourism as a basis for their economies, so this decision could place them at some disadvantage. The researchers therefore highlight the need to ensure that any regulatory frameworks put in place to tackle climate change take into account the development needs of the most vulnerable countries affected.
A report published by researchers at the Centre for Aviation, Transport and Environment at Manchester Metropolitan University found that the only way to have a significant impact on emissions was to put a price on carbon and to use a market-based measure (MBM), such as the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS).[99]
International Civil Aviation Organization agreement 2016[edit]
In October 2016 the UN agency International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) finalized an agreement among its 191 member nations to address the more than 7011458000000000000♠458 Mt (2010)[100] of carbon dioxide emitted annually by international passenger and cargo flights. The agreement will use an offsetting scheme called CORSIA (the Carbon Offsetting and Reduction Scheme for International Aviation) under which forestry and other carbon-reducing activities are directly funded, amounting to about 2% of annual revenues for the sector. Rules against 'double counting' should ensure that existing forest protection efforts are not recycled. The scheme does not take effect until 2021 and will be voluntary until 2027, but many countries, including the US and China, have promised to begin at its 2020 inception date. Under the agreement, the global aviation emissions target is an 80% reduction by 2035 relative to 2020. NGO reaction to the deal was mixed.[101]
The agreement has critics. It is not aligned with the 2015 Paris climate agreement, which set the objective of restricting global warming to 1.5 to 2 °C. A late draft of the agreement would have required the air transport industry to assess its share of global carbon budgeting to meet that objective, but the text was removed in the agreed version.[102][103] CORSIA will regulate only about 25 percent of aviation's international emissions, since it grandfather's all emissions below the 2020 level, allowing unregulated growth until then.[104] Only 65 nations will participate in the initial voluntary period, not including significant emitters Russia, India and perhaps Brazil. The agreement does not cover domestic emissions, which are 40% of the global industry's overall emissions.[103] One observer of the ICAO convention made this summary:
Airline claims that flying will now be green are a myth. Taking a plane is the fastest and cheapest way to fry the planet and this deal won't reduce demand for jet fuel one drop. Instead offsetting aims to cut emissions in other industries,
although another critic called it "a timid step in the right direction."[105]
Effects of climate change on aviation[edit]
Increased turbulence[edit]
A report published in the science journal Nature Climate Change forecasts that increasing CO2 levels will result in a significant increase in in-flight turbulence experienced by transatlantic airline flights by the middle of the 21st century. The lead author of the study, Paul Williams, a researcher at the National Center for Atmospheric Science, at the University of Reading stated, "air turbulence does more than just interrupt the service of in-flight drinks. It injures hundreds of passengers and aircrew every year – sometimes fatally. It also causes delays and damage to planes."[106]
Noise[edit]
Main article: Aircraft noise
Aircraft noise is seen by advocacy groups as being very hard to get attention and action on. The fundamental issues are increased traffic at larger airports and airport expansion at smaller and regional airports.[107]
Water pollution[edit]
Airports can generate significant water pollution due to their extensive use and handling of jet fuel, lubricants and other chemicals. Airports install spill control structures and related equipment (e.g., vacuum trucks, portable berms, absorbents) to prevent chemical spills, and mitigate the impacts of spills that do occur.[108]
In cold climates, the use of deicing fluids can also cause water pollution, as most of the fluids applied to aircraft subsequently fall to the ground and can be carried via stormwater runoff to nearby streams, rivers or coastal waters.[109]:101 Airlines use deicing fluids based on ethylene glycol or propylene glycol as the active ingredient.[109]:4
Ethylene glycol and propylene glycol are known to exert high levels of biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) during degradation in surface waters. This process can adversely affect aquatic life by consuming oxygen needed by aquatic organisms for survival. Large quantities of dissolved oxygen (DO) in the water column are consumed when microbial populations decompose propylene glycol.[110]:2–23
Sufficient dissolved oxygen levels in surface waters are critical for the survival of fish, macroinvertebrates, and other aquatic organisms. If oxygen concentrations drop below a minimum level, organisms emigrate, if able and possible, to areas with higher oxygen levels or eventually die. This effect can drastically reduce the amount of usable aquatic habitat. Reductions in DO levels can reduce or eliminate bottom feeder populations, create conditions that favor a change in a community’s species profile, or alter critical food-web interactions.[110]:2–30
Air quality[edit]
See also: Air Pollution
Particulate Emissions[edit]
Ultrafine particles (UFPs) are emitted by aircraft engines during near-surface level operations including taxi, takeoff, climb, descent, and landing, as well as idling at gates and on taxiways. Other sources of UFPs include ground support equipment operating around the terminal areas. In 2014, an air quality study found the area impacted by ultrafine particles from the takeoffs and landings downwind of Los Angeles International Airport to be of much greater magnitude than previously thought.[111] Typical UFP emissions during takeoff are on the order of 1015-1017 particles emitted per kilogram of fuel burned. Non-volatile soot particle emissions are 1014-1016 particles per kilogram fuel on a number basis and 0.1-1 gram per kilogram fuel on a mass basis, depending on the engine and fuel characteristics.[112][113][114][115][116]
Lead emissions[edit]
See also: Avgas § Environmental regulation
Some 167,000 piston engine aircraft—about three-quarters of private planes in the United States—release lead (Pb) into the air due to leaded aviation fuel.[117] From 1970 to 2007, general aviation aircraft emitted about 34,000 tons of lead into the atmosphere according to the Environmental Protection Agency.[118] Lead is recognized as a serious environmental threat by the Federal Aviation Administration if inhaled or ingested leading to adverse effects on the nervous system, red blood cells and cardiovascular and immune systems with infants and young children especially sensitive to even low levels of lead, which may contribute to behavioral and learning problems, lower IQ[119] and autism.[120]
Radiation exposure[edit]
Flying 12 kilometres (39,000 ft) high, passengers and crews of jet airliners are exposed to at least 10 times the cosmic ray dose that people at sea level receive. Every few years, a geomagnetic storm permits a solar particle event to penetrate down to jetliner altitudes. Aircraft flying polar routes near the geomagnetic poles are at particular risk.[121][122][123][124]
See also[edit]
Book: Aviation
Aviation Environment Federation, a UK focused non-profit direct action group
Chemtrail conspiracy theory
Continuous descent approach
Electric aircraft
Environmental impact of aviation in the United Kingdom
Flying Matters, a pro-aviation coalition in the United Kingdom
Hydrogen powered aircraft
Hypermobility (travel)
Plane Mad (direct action group)
Notes and references[edit]
Jump up ^ International Civil Aviation Organization, Air Transport Bureau (ATB). "Aircraft Engine Emissions". Retrieved 2008-03-19.
Jump up ^ Enviro.aero. "What is the impact of flying?". Archived from the original on 30 June 2007. Retrieved 2008-03-19.
Jump up ^ Travis, David J.; Carleton, Andrew M. & Lauritsen, Ryan G (2002). "Contrails reduce daily temperature range" (PDF). Nature. 418 (6898): 601. doi:10.1038/418601a. PMID 12167846. Archived from - %5b%5bWP:CITESPAM%5d%5d the original Check |url= value (help) on 3 May 2006. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list (link)
Jump up ^ Guy Brasseur et al.: "Impact of aviation on climate. FAA's Aviation Climate Change Research Initiative (ACCRI) Phase II". . Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 97, No. 4, 561–584, doi:10.1175/BAMS-D-13-00089.1.
Jump up ^ "Climate change: Commission proposes bringing air transport into EU Emissions Trading Scheme" (Press release). EU press release. 2006-12-20. Retrieved 2008-01-02.
Jump up ^ Bows-Larkin A., Mander S., Traut M., Anderson K., Wood P. (2016). Aviation and Climate Change – The Continuing Challenge. Encyclopedia of aerospace engineering. See esp. Fig. 7.
Jump up ^ Timmis, A.; Hodzic, A.; Koh, L.; Bonner, M.; Soutis, C.; Schafer, A.; Dray, L. (2014). "Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials". Int J Life Cycle Assess. 20: 233–243. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0824-0.
Jump up ^ Boeing (2014). Current Market Outlook, 2014–2033.
Jump up ^ Airbus (2015). Flying by Numbers: Global Market Forecast 2015–2034.
Jump up ^ Bows A., Anderson K., Upham P. (2009). Aviation and Climate Change: Lessons for European Policy. Routledge. 146pp. (See esp. Ch.5).
Jump up ^ Including Aviation into the EU ETS: Impact on EU allowance prices ICF Consulting for DEFRA February 2006
^ Jump up to: a b Anderson, K. (17 June 2008). Reframing climate change: from long-term targets to emission pathways (esp. slide 24 onward).
Jump up ^ McNeil BI, Matear RJ (2008). Southern Ocean acidification: A tipping point at 450-ppm atmospheric CO2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (105:48; p.18860). (In the Southern Ocean, an ecological tipping point due to "wintertime aragonite undersaturation is projected to occur by the year 2030 and no later than 2038.")
Jump up ^ Assoc. Press 2014. As air traffic grows, safety at forefront. By S. Mayerowitz, AP Airlines Writer. 2 August 2014
Jump up ^ Why airfare keeps rising despite lower oil prices, by Scott Mayerowitz, Assoc. Press Airlines Writer. Houston Chron., 17 November 2014.
Jump up ^ Horvath A, Chester M (2008). Environmental Life-cycle Assessment of Passenger Transportation An Energy, Greenhouse Gas and Criteria Pollutant Inventory of Rail and Air Transportation. Info: University of California Transportation Center, UC Berkeley.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f IPCC, Aviation and the Global Atmosphere: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1999), Cambridge University Press
Jump up ^ Valuing the non-CO2 climate impacts of aviation Climatic Change, 111 (3–4) s. 559–579 2012
Jump up ^ http://climatecare.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Calculating-the-Environmental-Impact-of-Aviation-Emissions.pdf
^ Jump up to: a b Sausen; Ivar Isaksen, Volker Grewe, Didier Hauglustaine, David S. Lee, Gunnar Myhre, Marcus O. KÖhler, Giovanni Pitari, Ulrich Schumann, Frode Stordal and Christos Zerefos, Robert (2005). "Aviation radiative forcing in 2000: an update on IPCC" (PDF). Meteorologische Zeitschrift. Gebrüder Borntraeger. 14 (4): 555–561. doi:10.1127/0941-2948/2005/0049. Retrieved 2017-02-03.
^ Jump up to: a b Aviation and the Global Atmosphere: A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (1999), Cambridge University Press
Jump up ^ SPM-2 Archived 14 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine.
Jump up ^ Bernhardt, J. & Carleton, A.M. (2015). The impacts of long-lived jet contrail ‘outbreaks’ on surface station diurnal temperature range. Jrnl of Int'l Climatology. Online-early (July).
Jump up ^ Jet contrails affect surface temperatures. Science Daily. 18 June 2015.
Jump up ^ "Questions & Answers on Aviation & Climate Change". European Commission. 2005-09-17. Retrieved 2008-01-12.
Jump up ^ Kärcher, B. (2016). "The importance of contrail ice formation for mitigating the climate impact of aviation". Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. 121 (7): 3497–3505. doi:10.1002/2015JD024696.
Jump up ^ Corporan, E.; et al. (2007). "Emissions characteristics of a turbine engine and research combustor burning a Fischer-Tropsch jet fuel". Energy & Fuels. 21: 2615–2626. doi:10.1021/ef070015j. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Lobo, P.; Hagen, D.E.; Whitefield, P.D. (2011). "Comparison of PM emissions from a commercial jet engine burning conventional, biomass, and Fischer-Tropsch fuels". Environmental Science & Technology. 45 (24): 10744–10749. doi:10.1021/es201902e.
Jump up ^ Moore, R.H.; et al. (2017). "Biofuel blending reduces particle emissions from aircraft engines at cruise conditions". Nature. 543: 411–415. doi:10.1038/nature21420. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Average passenger aircraft emissions and energy consumption per passenger kilometre in Finland 2008 accessed 3 July 2009
Jump up ^ Average emissions and energy consumption per vehicle kilometre of cars in Finland in 2009 accessed 3 July 2009
Jump up ^ Nevins, Joseph (2010, 13-Dec), Kicking the Habit: Air Travel in the Time of Climate Change.
^ Jump up to: a b Owen B, Lee DS, Lim L, 2010/04/01 P- (2010). Flying into the Future: Aviation Emissions Scenarios to 2050. Environmental Science & Technology (44:7, p.2255-2260).
Jump up ^ Lowy, Joan (2016-10-07). "UN agreement reached on aircraft climate-change emissions". Associated Press. Archived from the original on 2017-09-07. Retrieved 2017-11-19.
Jump up ^ Goodall, Chris (2007-02-08). How to Live a Low-carbon Life: The Individual's Guide to Stopping Climate Change. Earthscan Publications Ltd. p. 326. ISBN 1-84407-426-9. p. 222
^ Jump up to: a b Bofinger, H.; Strand, J. (2013). Calculating the carbon footprint from different classes of air travel. World Bank, Development Research Group, Env. & Energy Team. 40pp. May 2013.
Jump up ^ Washington Post (2013). How the World Bank could slash its carbon emissions: Start flying coach. By Howard Schneider, 13 June 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b ICCT (2013). Inflight Luxury: Who Really Pays?. By Irene Kwan. Int'l Counc. on Clean Transport.
Jump up ^ The Future of Air Transport White Paper (2003), HMSO "The aviation industry is encouraged to take account of, and where appropriate reduce, its contribution to global warming...The impact of aviation on climate change is increased over that of direct CO2 emissions alone by some of the other emissions released and their specific effects at altitude".
Jump up ^ "New Report: Airplane Pollution Jeopardizes Paris Climate Goals" (Press release). Tucson, AZ, USA: Center for Biological Diversity. 2 December 2015. Retrieved 2016-10-13.
Jump up ^ Paradee, Vera (December 2015). Up in the air: how airplane carbon pollution jeopardizes global climate goals (PDF). Tucson, AZ, USA: Center for Biological Diversity. Retrieved 14 October 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b IATA (2010, Nov.) Air Transport Market Analysis Accessed: 23 January 2011.
Jump up ^ Anderson K, Bows A (2008). Reframing the climate change challenge in light of post-2000 emission trends. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences (366:1882, p.3863-3882). [1],
Jump up ^ 4 Degrees and Beyond International Climate Conference, 28–30 Sept 2009, Oxford, UK. "Archived copy". Archived from the original on 4 June 2011. Retrieved 27 May 2011.
Jump up ^ Royal Society (2011). Special Issue: "Four degrees and beyond" (Jan 2011). Philosophical Transactions — A (369:1934). http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/369/1934.toc
Jump up ^ Gössling S, Ceron JP, Dubois G, Hall CM, Gössling IS, Upham P, Earthscan L (2009). Hypermobile travellers. Chapter 6 in: Climate Change and Aviation: Issues, Challenges and Solutions; "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 June 2010. Retrieved 2011-05-24.
Jump up ^ Gössling S, Upham P (2009). Climate change and aviation: Issues, challenges and solutions. http://www.earthscan.co.uk/?tabid=42745
Jump up ^ Budd, L., Griggs, S., Howarth, D. (2013) Sustainable Aviation Futures. Bingley: Emerald
Jump up ^ IATA/ATAG, Aviation & the Environment (1999) "Aircraft fuel efficiency has improved by some 50% over the past 30 years"
^ Jump up to: a b c d Peeters P.M., Middel J., Hoolhorst A. (2005). Fuel efficiency of commercial aircraft — An overview of historical and future trends. National Aerospace Laboratory. NLR-CR-2005-669, 37pp.
Jump up ^ Back to the Future: Return of the Turboprop?. By Irene Kwan. Int'l Counc. on Clean Transport. 3 June 2014.
Jump up ^ Advisory Council for Aeronautical Research in Europe (ACARE) Strategic Research Agenda (2002) Archived 28 November 2007 at the Wayback Machine. "These objectives include, inter alia, a 50% cut in CO2 and 80% in Nox emissions" [for new aircraft introduced in 2020 relative to new aircraft introduced in 2000].
^ Jump up to: a b Timmis, A.; Hodzic, A.; Koh, L.; Bonner, M.; Soutis, C.; Schafer, A.; Dray, L. (2014). "Environmental impact assessment of aviation emission reduction through the implementation of composite materials". The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment. 20: 233–243. doi:10.1007/s11367-014-0824-0.
Jump up ^ EOS magazine November 2011
Jump up ^ Fuel Cell-powered Electric Nose Wheel Nears Flight Tests, EV World, 9 Feb 2011.
Jump up ^ Tests prove electric-drive concept, Flight Global 9 Aug 2005.
Jump up ^ Civilian aircraft using EMALS
Jump up ^ Civilian aircraft using EMALS ref 2
Jump up ^ International Civil Aviation Organization Operational Opportunities to Minimize Fuel Use and Reduce Emissions (2001)
Jump up ^ Williams; Robert B. Nolanda, Victoria; Ralf Toumib (November 2002). "Reducing the climate change impacts of aviation by restricting cruise altitudes" (PDF). Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. 7 (6): 451–464. doi:10.1016/S1361-9209(02)00013-5. Retrieved 2014-01-07.
^ Jump up to: a b c CBC News (February 2008). "Airline flies jumbo jet powered by biofuel". Retrieved 2008-02-24.
Jump up ^ South Dakota State University (2006). "Active Projects". Archived from the original on 2007-09-28. Retrieved 2008-02-19.
Jump up ^ Rapier R (2011, 20-Jan). Marginal Land Produces Marginal Biomass. Consumer Energy Report
Jump up ^ Ron Oxburgh. Through biofuels we can reap the fruits of our labours The Guardian, 28 February 2008. Retrieved 24 December 2008.
Jump up ^ Patrick Barta. As Biofuels Catch On, Next Task Is to Deal With Environmental, Economic Impact Wall Street Journal, 24 March 2008. Retrieved 24 December 2008.
Jump up ^ Air New Zealand Completes Biofuel Test GreenBiz.com, 5 January 2009. Retrieved 5 January 2009.
Jump up ^ Sustainable flight The Engineer Online, 12 January 2009. Retrieved 12 January 2009.
Jump up ^ Grady, Mary (December 2009). "Efforts Move Forward To Produce Alternative Aviation Fuels". Retrieved 2009-03-05.
Jump up ^ Purdue Research Park (December 2009). "Indiana Airline Fuel Developer Moves Ahead With Testing". Archived from the original on 18 January 2011. Retrieved 2009-12-17.
Jump up ^ "50 Percent Biofuels Now Allowed in Jet Fuel". Renewable Energy World. 1 July 2011.
Jump up ^ Meg Cichon (2 December 2011). "FAA Awards $7.7 Million for Advancement of Aviation Biofuels". Renewable Energy World.
Jump up ^ "The Bill", by Peter Wedel, distributed by GermanWatch.
Jump up ^ Marshall, G. (2009, 24-July). Why We Still Don’t Believe In Climate Change
^ Jump up to: a b c Reay DS (2004). New Directions: Flying in the face of the climate change convention. Atmospheric Environment (38:5, p.793-794).
Jump up ^ Le Quéré, C. et al. 2015. Towards a culture of low-carbon research for the 21st Century. Abstract page.
Jump up ^ Id. The Report.
Jump up ^ Nudging Climate Scientists To Follow Their Own Advice On Flying. FiveThirtyEight. by Christie Aschwanden. 26 March 2015.
^ Jump up to: a b c d The Economist (2005, 20-Dec), Frequent-flyer miles — Funny money.
Jump up ^ UNEP DTIE (Sustainable Consumption & Production Branch)(undated). A Guide to Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction in UN Organizations (DTI/1217/PA). pp.18–19.
Jump up ^ MedCaribbean.com. Making The Most Of Your Airlines Miles Credit Cards.
^ Jump up to: a b c Storm, S. (1999). "Air transport policies and frequent flyer programmes in the European Community: a Scandinavian perspective". Unit of Tourism Research, Research Centre of Bornholm: 1–105. CiteSeerX 10.1.1.138.3305  .
Jump up ^ Cognac M, DeLozier M (1997)Frequent Flyer Programs Promotion: An Analysis Of A Paradoxical Industry. Southwestern Marketing Association (p.1-12).
^ Jump up to: a b Tretheway MW (1989) Frequent Flyer Programs: Marketing Bonanza or Anti-Competitive Tool? (30:1), p.445.
^ Jump up to: a b c Cohen S, Higham J, Cavaliere C (2011). Binge flying: Behavioural addiction and climate change.[permanent dead link] Annals of Tourism Research
Jump up ^ Aftenpost (2002). Sterling polishes plans for new routes Archived 11 November 2012 at the Wayback Machine., by Nina Berglund, 19 Mar 2002.
Jump up ^ Orlando Sentinel (1989). Braniff Will SlimDown, Keep Flying, by Kenneth Michael, 4 Oct 1989.
Jump up ^ Cairns, Dr Sally & Carey Newson; et al. (September 2006). "Predict and decide — Aviation, climate change and UK policy" (PDF). pp. 96, section 11.9. Retrieved 2008-05-31.
Jump up ^ Cairns, Dr Sally & Carey Newson; et al. (September 2006). "Predict and decide — Aviation, climate change and UK policy" (PDF). p. 4. Retrieved 2008-05-31.
Jump up ^ Sewill, Brendon (February 2003). "The Hidden Cost of Flying" (PDF). Aviation Environment Federation. pp. 19–20. Retrieved 2007-10-18.
Jump up ^ "Select Committee on Environmental Audit Ninth Report". British House of Commons. 19 July 2006. pp. paras. 112, 118–125, 113–114 & 126–133. Retrieved 2007-11-12.
Jump up ^ GreenAirOnline (2009, 22-Dec). Copenhagen's failure to deliver an aviation emissions deal leaves sector facing an uncertain future.
Jump up ^ RTCC (2014). [Planes and ships escape scrutiny in bottom-up climate regime http://www.rtcc.org/2014/12/22/planes-and-ships-escape-scrutiny-in-bottom-up-climate-regime/]. Subtitle, "International aviation and shipping are not mentioned in the Lima call for climate action, despite growing emissions." 22 Dec. 2014.
Jump up ^ Bows, A.; Traut, M.; Gilbert, P.; Mander, S.; Walsh, C.; & Anderson, K. (2012). Aviation and shipping privileged – again? UK delays decision to act on emissions. Briefing Note No. 47; Tyndall Cent. for Clim. Chg. Research. Dec. 2012.
Jump up ^ Bows-Larkin, A (2014). "All adrift: aviation, shipping, and climate change policy". Clim. Policy: 1–22. doi:10.1080/14693062.2014.965125.
Jump up ^ ICAO news release 30 November 2005 Archived 29 September 2007 at the Wayback Machine. "ICAO is also considering market-based options to address engine emissions through the participation of aviation in emissions trading schemes and the use of emissions levies related to local air quality. Guidelines for Contracting States wishing to implement such measures are being formulated and should be completed in time for the next regular Session of the ICAO Assembly in the Fall of 2007, when direction for future action will be set."
Jump up ^ European Commission, Reducing the Climate Change Impact of Aviation (2005)
Jump up ^ Directive 2008/101/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (Text with EEA relevance)
Jump up ^ Keane, J. (2012) Briefing paper: The aviation industry, the European Union's Emissions Trading Scheme and Small and Vulnerable Economies: development-friendly frameworks. Overseas Development Institute
Jump up ^ Lee, D. et al 2013 Briefing paper: Bridging the aviation CO2 emissions gap: why emissions trading is needed. Centre for Aviation, Transport and the Environment
Jump up ^ Cames, Martin; Graichen, Jakob; Siemons, Anne; Cook, Vanessa (November 2015). "Emission Reduction Targets for International Aviation and Shipping" (PDF). European Parliament, Directorate-General for internal policies. p. 48. Retrieved 2016-11-10.
Jump up ^ Milman, Oliver (6 October 2016). "First deal to curb aviation emissions agreed in landmark UN accord". The Guardian. London, United Kingdom. Retrieved 2016-10-20.
Jump up ^ UN aviation pact will not be aligned with Paris climate goals, M. Darby, Climate Change News, 6 Oct 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b The new UN deal on aviation emissions leaves much to be desired, D. Hodgkinson & R. Johnston. The Conversation, 10 Oct 2016.
Jump up ^ Weak Market-based Measure Allows Airplanes' Greenhouse Pollution to Triple, press release by Center for Biological Diversity and Friends of the Earth. 6 Oct 2016.
Jump up ^ Green Groups Warn Deal to Lower Aviation Pollution is 'Weak Shell Game', N. Prupis, Common Dreams, 6 Oct 2016
Jump up ^ "Fasten your seatbelts: Climate change to increase flight turbulence". RT News. 9 April 2013. Retrieved 29 December 2014.
Jump up ^ Noise Pollution Clearinghouse. "Aviation Noise". Retrieved 2007-12-29.
Jump up ^ Sector S: Vehicle Maintenance Areas, Equipment Cleaning Areas, or Deicing Areas Located at Air Transportation Facilities (Report). Industrial Stormwater Fact Sheet Series. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). December 2006. EPA-833-F-06-034.
^ Jump up to: a b Technical Development Document for the Final Effluent Limitations Guidelines and New Source Performance Standards for the Airport Deicing Category (Report). EPA. April 2012. EPA-821-R-12-005. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
^ Jump up to: a b Environmental Impact and Benefit Assessment for the Final Effluent Limitation Guidelines and Standards for the Airport Deicing Category (Report). EPA. April 2012. EPA-821-R-12-003. This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain.
Jump up ^ Weikel, Dan and Barboza, Tony (May 29, 2014) "Planes' exhaust could be harming communities up to 10 miles from LAX" Los Angeles Times
Jump up ^ Herndon, S.C.; et al. (2005). "Particulate Emissions from in-use Commercial Aircraft". Aerosol Science and Technology. 39: 799–809. doi:10.1080/02786820500247363. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Herdon, S.C.; et al. (2008). "Commercial Aircraft Engine Emissions Characterization of in-Use Aircraft at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport". Environmental Science & Technology. 42: 1877–1883. doi:10.1021/es072029+. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ Lobo, P.; Hagen, D.E.; Whitefield, P.D. (2012). "Measurement and analysis of aircraft engine PM emissions downwind of an active runway at the Oakland International Airport". Atmospheric Environment. 61: 114–123. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2012.07.028.
Jump up ^ Klapmeyer, M.E.; Marr, L.C. (2012). "CO2, NOx, and Particle Emissions from Aircraft and Support Activities at a Regional Airport". Environmental Science & Technology. 46: 10974–10981. doi:10.1021/es302346x.
Jump up ^ Moore, R.H.; et al. (2017). "Take-off engine particle emission indices for in-service aircraft at Los Angeles International Airport". Scientific Data. 4: 170198. doi:10.1038/sdata.2017.198. CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. (link)
Jump up ^ "Leaded Fuel Is a Thing of the Past—Unless You Fly a Private Plane". Mother Jones. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ "Lead-free airplane fuel testing is in progress at Lewis". www.lewisu.edu. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ "Fact Sheet – Leaded Aviation Fuel and the Environment". www.faa.gov. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ "Study: Lead exposure can cause autism". Metro US. 2013-02-26. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ Evaluation of the Cosmic Ray Exposure of Aircraft Crew
Jump up ^ Phillips, Tony (25 October 2013). "The Effects of Space Weather on Aviation". Science News. NASA.
Jump up ^ "Converting Cosmic Rays to Sound During a Transatlantic Flight to Zurich" on YouTube
Jump up ^ NAIRAS (Nowcast of Atmospheric Ionizing Radiation System)
External links[edit]
Concerns
"planestupid.com". Plane Stupid. network of grassroots groups that take non violent direct action against aviation expansion
"airportwatch.org.uk". AirportWatch. oppose any expansion of aviation and airports likely to damage the human or natural environment, and to promote an aviation policy for the UK which is in full accordance with the principles of sustainable development
Industry
"Aviation: Benefits Beyond Borders". Air Transport Action Group. information on the many industry measures underway to limit the impact of aviation on the environment
"sustainableaviation.co.uk". Sustainable Aviation. collective approach of UK aviation to tackling the challenge of ensuring a sustainable future
"The aviation sector's climate action framework" (PDF). Air Transport Action Group. November 2015.
Research
"Aviation Sustainability Center". Washington State University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"Laboratory for Aviation and the Environment". Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"Partnership for Air Transportation Noise and Emissions Reduction". Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
"Sustainable Sky Institute". Sustainable Sky Institute.
Alice Larkin. "Publications". , on ResearchGate.[which?]
Stefan Gössling. "publications". Lund University — Department of Service Management and Service Studies. [which?]
David S. Lee (Climatologist). "publications". , on ResearchGate.[which?]
Studies
"Aviation and the Global Atmosphere — Summary" (PDF). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 1999.
Stefan Krüger Nielsen, ECOtransport Consulting (2003). "Greenhouse gas emissions from international aviation and allocation options" (PDF). Ministry of the Environment of Denmark.
"Clearing the Air: The Myth and Reality of Aviation and Climate Change" (PDF). European Federation for Transport and Environment and Climate Action Network. 2006. [which?]
"Guidelines to Defra / DECC's GHG Conversion Factors for Company Reporting" (PDF). Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs. 2012.
Stefan Gössling and Paul Upham (2009). Climate Change and Aviation — Issues, Challenges and Solutions (PDF). Earthscan. ISBN 978-1-84407-619-2.
Articles
Antoine Gelain (Aug 10, 2016). "Opinion: The Uncomfortable Truth About Aviation Emissions". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
[show]
v
t
e
Global warming and climate change
[show]
Temperatures
Brightness temperature
Effective temperature
Geologic record
Hiatus
Historical climatology
Instrumental record
Paleoclimatology
Paleotempestology
Proxy data
Record of the past 1,000 years
Satellite measurements
[show]
Causes
Anthropogenic
Attribution of recent climate change
Aviation
Biofuel
Black carbon
Carbon dioxide
Deforestation
Earth's energy budget
Earth's radiation balance
Ecocide
Fossil fuel
Global dimming
Global warming potential
Greenhouse effect
(Infrared window)
Greenhouse gases
(Halocarbons)
Land use, land-use change and forestry
Radiative forcing
Tropospheric ozone
Urban heat island
Natural
Albedo
Bond events
Climate oscillations
Climate sensitivity
Cloud forcing
Cosmic rays
Feedbacks
Glaciation
Global cooling
Milankovitch cycles
Ocean variability
AMO
ENSO
IOD
PDO
Orbital forcing
Solar variation
Volcanism
Models
Global climate model
[show]
History
History of climate change science
Atmospheric thermodynamics
Svante Arrhenius
James Hansen
Charles David Keeling
[show]
Opinion and climate change
Environmental ethics
Media coverage of climate change
Public opinion on climate change
(Popular culture)
Scientific opinion on climate change
Scientists opposing the mainstream assessment
Climate change denial
Global warming conspiracy theory
By country & region
(Africa
Arctic
Argentina
Australia
Bangladesh
Belgium
Canada
China
Europe
European Union
Finland
Grenada
Japan
Luxembourg
New Zealand
Norway
Russia
Scotland
South Korea
Sweden
Tuvalu
United Kingdom
United States)
[show]
Politics
Clean Power Plan
Climate change denial
(Manufactured controversy)
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)
March for Science
People's Climate March
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC / FCCC)
Global climate regime
[show]
Potential effects and issues
General
Abrupt climate change
Anoxic event
Arctic dipole anomaly
Arctic haze
Arctic methane release
Climate change and agriculture
Climate change and ecosystems
Climate change and gender
Climate change and poverty
Current sea level rise
Drought
Economics of global warming
Effect on plant biodiversity
Effects on health
Effects on humans
Effects on marine mammals
Environmental migrant
Extinction risk from global warming
Fisheries and climate change
Forest dieback
Industry and society
Iris hypothesis
Megadrought
Ocean acidification
Ozone depletion
Physical impacts
Polar stratospheric cloud
Regime shift
Retreat of glaciers since 1850
Runaway climate change
Season creep
Shutdown of thermohaline circulation
By country
Australia
South Asia
India
Nepal
United States
[show]
Mitigation
Kyoto Protocol
Clean Development Mechanism
Joint Implementation
Bali Road Map
2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference
Governmental
European Climate Change Programme
G8 Climate Change Roundtable
United Kingdom Climate Change Programme
Paris Agreement
United States withdrawal
Regional climate change initiatives in the United States
List of climate change initiatives
Emissions reduction
Carbon credit
Carbon-neutral fuel
Carbon offset
Carbon tax
Emissions trading
Fossil-fuel phase-out
Carbon-free energy
Carbon capture and storage
Efficient energy use
Low-carbon economy
Nuclear power
Renewable energy
Personal
Individual action on climate change
Simple living
Other
Carbon dioxide removal
Carbon sink
Climate change mitigation scenarios
Climate engineering
Individual and political action on climate change
Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation
Reforestation
Urban reforestation
Climate Action Plan
Climate action
[show]
Proposed adaptations
Strategies
Damming glacial lakes
Desalination
Drought tolerance
Irrigation investment
Rainwater storage
Sustainable development
Weather modification
Programmes
Avoiding dangerous climate change
Land allocation decision support system
Glossary of climate change
Index of climate change articles
Category:Climate change
Category:Global warming
Portal:Global warming
[show]
v
t
e
Human impact on the environment
General
Anthropocene
Environmental issues
List of issues
Human impact
Impact assessment
Planetary boundaries
Causes
Agriculture
fishing
irrigation
meat production
palm oil
Energy industry
biofuels
biodiesel
coal
electricity generation
nuclear power
oil shale
petroleum
reservoirs
wind power
Genetic pollution
Industrialization
Land use
Manufacturing
cleaning agents
concrete
plastics
nanotechnology
paint
paper
pesticides
pharmaceuticals and personal care
Mining
Overdrafting
Overfishing
Overgrazing
Overexploitation
Overpopulation
Particulates
Pollution
Quarrying
Reservoirs
Tourism
Transport
aviation
roads
shipping
Urbanization
urban sprawl
war
Effects
Biodiversity threats
Biodiversity loss
Climate change
Global warming
Runaway climate change
Coral reefs
Deforestation
Defaunation
Desertification
Ecocide
Erosion
Environmental degradation
Freshwater cycle
Habitat destruction
Holocene extinction
Nitrogen cycle
Land degradation
Land surface effects on climate
Loss of green belts
Phosphorus cycle
Ocean acidification
Ozone depletion
Resource depletion
Water degradation
Water scarcity
Mitigation
Birth control
Cleaner production
Climate change mitigation
Climate engineering
Ecological engineering
Environmental engineering
Environmental mitigation
Industrial ecology
Mitigation banking
Organic farming
Reforestation
urban
Restoration ecology
Sustainable consumption
Waste minimization
Commons
Category
by country
assessment
mitigation
[show]
v
t
e
Commercial air travel
Airlines
Airline codes
Airline holding companies
Charter airlines
Low-cost airlines
Passenger airlines
Regional airlines
Alliances
Oneworld
SkyTeam
Star Alliance
Value Alliance
Vanilla Alliance
U-FLY Alliance
Trade groups
International (ACO
ATAG
IATA
IATAN
ISTAT)
United States (A4A
RAA)
Europe (AEA
EBAA
ELFAA
ERA)
Other regions (AACO
AAPA
AFRAA
RAAA)
Aircrew
Captain
First Officer
Second Officer
Third Officer
Flight attendant
Flight engineer
Loadmaster
Pilot
Purser
Deadheading
Airliner
Travel class
First class (aviation)
First class travel
Business
Premium economy
Economy
Aircraft cabin
Aircraft lavatory
Aircraft seat map
Airline meal
Airline seat
Buy on board
Crew rest compartment
In-flight entertainment
Inflight smoking
Galley
Sickness bag
Airport
Aerodrome
Airline hub
Airport check-in
Airport lounge
Airport rail link
Airport terminal
Airstair
Boarding
Domestic airport
Gate
International airport
Jet bridge
Low cost carrier terminal
Runway
Transit hotel
Customs / Immigration
Arrival card (Landing card)
Border control
Departure card
Passport
Timatic
Travel document
Visa
Environmental impact
Hypermobility
Impact on environment
Law
Air transport agreement
Bermuda Agreement (UK-US, 1946-78)
Bermuda II Agreement (UK-US, 1978-2008)
China-US
Cross-Strait charter (China-Taiwan)
Beijing Convention
Cape Town Treaty
Chicago Convention
Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives
European Common Aviation Area
Flight permit
Freedoms of the air
Hague Hijacking Convention
Hague Protocol
ICAO
Montreal Convention
Open skies (EU–US Open Skies Agreement)
Paris Convention of 1919
Rome Convention
Sabotage Convention
Tokyo Convention
Warsaw Convention
Luggage
Bag tag
Baggage allowance
Baggage carousel
Baggage cart
Baggage reclaim
Baggage handler
Baggage handling system
Checked baggage
Hand luggage
Lost luggage
Luggage lock
Safety
Air Navigation and Transport Act
Air rage
Air traffic control (ATC)
Aircraft safety card
Airport authority
Airport crash tender
Airport police
Airport security
Brace position
Evacuation slide
Flight recorder
National aviation authority
Overwing exits
Pre-flight safety demonstration
Sky marshal
Unruly aircraft passenger
Ticketing
Airline booking ploys
Airline reservations system
Airline ticket
Airline timetable
Bereavement flight
Boarding pass
Codeshare agreement
Continent pass
Electronic ticket
Fare basis code
Flight cancellation and delay
Frequent-flyer program
Government contract flight
One-way travel
Open-jaw ticket
Passenger name record
Red-eye flight
Round-the-world ticket
Standby
Tracking
Travel agency
Travel website
Groundcrew
Aircraft maintenance technician
Aircraft ground handler
Baggage handler
Flight dispatcher
Miscellaneous
Mile high club
Aviation portal
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Environmental_impact_of_aviation&oldid=833350046"
Categories:
Air pollution
Aviation and the environment
Environmental impact by source
Hidden categories:
Pages with URL errors
CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list
Webarchive template wayback links
CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from January 2018
Articles with permanently dead external links
Use dmy dates from March 2014
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2016
Articles with unsourced statements from February 2013
Articles with unsourced statements from June 2014
All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases
Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2015
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
Languages
Deutsch
Español
Euskara
Français
עברית
Português
Simple English
Edit links
This page was last edited on 31 March 2018, at 01:17.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

value: mw-page-base noprint

value: mw-head-base noprint

value: firstHeading firstHeading en

value: siteSub noprint

value: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attr: alt src width height class srcset data-file-width data-file-height

attr: href class title

value:
/wiki/C-141_Starlifter
mw-redirect
C-141 Starlifter

attr: class style

tag: b

tag: sup

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (December 2016)

value:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2016)

value:
/wiki/External_costs
mw-redirect
External costs

value: Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

value:
/wiki/Oxides_of_nitrogen
mw-redirect
Oxides of nitrogen

value:
/wiki/Water_vapour
mw-redirect
Water vapour

value:
/wiki/Atmospheric_particulate_matter
mw-redirect
Atmospheric particulate matter

value: Edit section: Mechanisms and cumulative effects of aviation on climate

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (February 2013)

value: Edit section: Water vapor (H2O), and contrails

value:
/wiki/Condensation_trails
mw-redirect
Condensation trails

value:
/wiki/Propeller_(aircraft)
mw-redirect
Propeller (aircraft)

value: Edit section: Greenhouse gas emissions per passenger kilometre

value: Edit section: Emissions by passenger class, and effects of seating configuration

value: Air transport and the environment (United Kingdom)

value: Edit section: Continual increases in travel and freight

value: 4 Degrees and Beyond International Climate Conference

value:
/wiki/Lockheed_Starliner
mw-redirect
Lockheed Starliner

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (June 2014)

value:
/wiki/Carbon-fiber-reinforced_polymer
mw-redirect
Carbon-fiber-reinforced polymer

value:
/wiki/Virgin_Fuels
mw-redirect
Virgin Fuels

value:
/wiki/Straight_vegetable_oil
mw-redirect
Straight vegetable oil

value:
/wiki/Virgin_Atlantic_Airways
mw-redirect
Virgin Atlantic Airways

value:
/wiki/Schiphol_Airport
mw-redirect
Schiphol Airport

value:
/wiki/Liquified_natural_gas
mw-redirect
Liquified natural gas

value: Edit section: Personal choices and social pressure

value: Edit section: Business and professional choices

value: Edit section: Ending incentives to fly—frequent flyer programs

value:
/wiki/Frequent_flyer_program
mw-redirect
Frequent flyer program

value: Edit section: Potential for governmental constraints on demand

value: Edit section: International regulation of air travel GHG emissions

value: International Civil Aviation Organization

value:
/wiki/Avoiding_dangerous_climate_change
mw-redirect
Avoiding dangerous climate change

value: Edit section: Approaches toward emissions trading

value: Centre for Aviation, Transport and Environment

value: Edit section: International Civil Aviation Organization agreement 2016

value: Edit section: Effects of climate change on aviation

value:
/wiki/Dissolved_oxygen
mw-redirect
Dissolved oxygen

value:
/wiki/Air_Pollution
mw-redirect
Air Pollution

value:
/wiki/Ultrafine_particles
mw-redirect
Ultrafine particles

value:
/wiki/Descent_(aircraft)
mw-redirect
Descent (aircraft)

value: Environmental impact of aviation in the United Kingdom

value:
/wiki/Hydrogen_powered_aircraft
mw-redirect
Hydrogen powered aircraft

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2F418601a

value:
/wiki/PubMed_Identifier
mw-redirect
PubMed Identifier

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12167846

value: Category:CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list

value: Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

value:
nofollow
external text
http://elib.dlr.de/19906/1/s13.pdf

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.ipcc.ch/SPM2feb07.pdf

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1002%2F2015JD024696

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1021%2Fef070015j

value: Category:CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al.

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1021%2Fes201902e

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2Fnature21420

value:
nofollow
http://www.eci.ox.ac.uk/4degrees/
external text

value:
nofollow
external free
http://www.earthscan.co.uk/?tabid=42745

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.age85.org/ActiveProjects.htm

value:
/wiki/Wall_Street_Journal
mw-redirect
Wall Street Journal

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.ghgonline.org/flyingaea.pdf

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.economist.com/node/5323615

value:
nofollow
external text
http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/1716

value: Centre for Aviation, Transport and the Environment

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1021%2Fes072029%2B

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1021%2Fes302346x

value:
nofollow
external text
//doi.org/10.1038%2Fsdata.2017.198

value: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

value:
nofollow
http://www.planestupid.com/
external text

value:
nofollow
http://www.airportwatch.org.uk/
external text

value:
nofollow
http://aviationbenefits.org/
external text

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.sustainableaviation.co.uk

value: Sustainable Aviation (page does not exist)

value:
nofollow
https://ascent.aero/
external text

value:
nofollow
http://lae.mit.edu/
external text

value:
nofollow
http://partner.mit.edu/
external text

value:
nofollow
external text
https://www.sustainablesky.com

value: Sustainable Sky Institute (page does not exist)

value: The material near this tag possibly uses too vague attribution or weasel words. (December 2015)

value:
/wiki/Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_words
mw-redirect
Wikipedia:Avoid weasel words

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.ism.lu.se/en/stefan-gossling

value: European Federation for Transport and Environment

value: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

value: Temperature record of the past 1000 years

value: nowraplinks collapsible collapsed navbox-subgroup

value:
/wiki/Global_warming_and_deforestation
mw-redirect
Global warming and deforestation

value:
/wiki/El_Ni%C3%B1o-Southern_Oscillation
mw-redirect
El Niño-Southern Oscillation

value:
/wiki/Solar_variation
mw-redirect
Solar variation

value:
/wiki/Global_climate_model
mw-redirect
Global climate model

value:
/wiki/Media_coverage_of_climate_change
mw-redirect
Media coverage of climate change

value: List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming

value:
/wiki/Climate_change_in_Belgium
mw-redirect
Climate change in Belgium

value:
/wiki/Climate_change_in_Luxembourg
mw-redirect
Climate change in Luxembourg

value:
/wiki/Climate_change_in_Norway
mw-redirect
Climate change in Norway

value:
/wiki/March_for_Science_2017
mw-redirect
March for Science 2017

value: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

value:
/wiki/Arctic_methane_release
mw-redirect
Arctic methane release

value:
/wiki/Current_sea_level_rise
mw-redirect
Current sea level rise

value: Effect of climate change on plant biodiversity

value: Effects of global warming on human health

value: Effects of climate change on marine mammals

value: 2009 United Nations Climate Change Conference

value: United States withdrawal from the Paris Agreement

value: Regional climate change initiatives in the United States

value:
/wiki/Fossil-fuel_phase-out
mw-redirect
Fossil-fuel phase-out

value: Individual and political action on climate change

value: Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation

value:
/wiki/Climate_Action_Plan
mw-redirect
Climate Action Plan

value:
/wiki/Climate_action
mw-redirect
Climate action

value:
/wiki/Adaptation_to_global_warming
mw-redirect
Adaptation to global warming

value: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

value: Template:Human impact on the environment

value: Template talk:Human impact on the environment

value:
/wiki/File:Planetary_boundaries.svg
image
Planetary boundaries

value:
navbox-image
4
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

value: Social and environmental impact of palm oil

value: Environmental impact of the energy industry

value: Indirect land use change impacts of biofuels

value: Environmental impact of the coal industry

value: Environmental impact of electricity generation

value: Environmental impact of the oil shale industry

value: Environmental impact of the petroleum industry

value:
/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_plastics
mw-redirect
Environmental impact of plastics

value: Environmental impact of pharmaceuticals and personal care products

value:
/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_tourism
mw-redirect
Environmental impact of tourism

value:
/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_roads
mw-redirect
Environmental impact of roads

value:
/wiki/Biodiversity_threats
mw-redirect
Biodiversity threats

value:
/wiki/Freshwater_cycle
mw-redirect
Freshwater cycle

value:
/wiki/Water_degradation
mw-redirect
Water degradation

value: Category:Environmental impact by country

value: International Association of Travel Agents Network

value: International Society of Transport Aircraft Trading

value: Regional Aviation Association of Australia

value: Air route authority between the United States and China

value: Chicago Convention on International Civil Aviation

value: Convention on the Marking of Plastic Explosives

value: Rome Convention on Damage Caused by Foreign Aircraft to Third Parties on the Surface

value: Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation

value: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value:
noprint metadata navbox
navigation
Portals
font-weight:bold;padding:0.4em 2em

value: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

value: Category:All articles with dead external links

value: Category:Articles with dead external links from January 2018

value: Category:Articles with permanently dead external links

value: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from December 2016

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2016

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from February 2013

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from June 2014

value: Category:All articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases

value: Category:Articles with specifically marked weasel-worded phrases from December 2015

value: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

value: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

value: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

value: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

value:
/wiki/Environmental_impact_of_aviation
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

value: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

value: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

value:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

value: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

value: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

value:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

value:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

value:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

value: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

value: Find background information on current events

value:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

value: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

value: Guidance on how to use and edit Wikipedia

value: About the project, what you can do, where to find things

value: A list of recent changes in the wiki [ctrl-alt-r]

value: portal navigation p-interaction p-interaction-label

value: List of all English Wikipedia pages containing links to this page [ctrl-alt-j]

value: Recent changes in pages linked from this page [ctrl-alt-k]

value:
/wiki/Wikipedia:File_Upload_Wizard
Upload files [ctrl-alt-u]
u

value: A list of all special pages [ctrl-alt-q]

value: Permanent link to this revision of the page

value: Link to connected data repository item [ctrl-alt-g]

value: Printable version of this page [ctrl-alt-p]

value: Umweltauswirkungen des Luftverkehrs – German

value: Impactos ambientales de la aviación – Spanish

value: השפעות סביבתיות של תעופה – Hebrew

value: Impactes ambientais da aviação – Portuguese

value: Environmental impact of aviation – Simple English

value: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

value: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

value:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

value: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Environmental_impact_of_aviation rootpage-Environmental_impact_of_aviation skin-vector action-view