text:
Second Battle of El Alamein
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Second Battle of El Alamein
Part of the Western Desert Campaign of the Second World War
24 October 1942: Soldiers of the 9th Australian Infantry Division in a posed attack. (Photographer: Len Chetwyn)
Date
23 October – 11 November 1942
Location
El Alamein, Egypt
Result
Allied victory
Belligerents
Germany
Italy
United Kingdom
India
Palestine
Australia
New Zealand
South Africa
Free French
Free Greeks
United States (air support)[1][2]
Commanders and leaders
Ettore Bastico
Georg Stumme †
Erwin Rommel Harold Alexander
Bernard Montgomery
Strength
116,000 men[3][a]
547 tanks[b]
192 armoured cars[4]
770[6] – 900 aircraft (480 serviceable)[c]
552 artillery pieces[8]
496 anti-tank guns[d] – 1,063[10] 195,000 men[4]
1,029 tanks[e]
435 armoured cars[4]
730[f] – 750 aircraft (530 serviceable)[g]
892[8] – 908 artillery pieces[4]
1,451 anti-tank guns[4][h]
Casualties and losses
36,939 to 59,000 men[i]
c. 500 tanks
254 guns
64 German and 20 Italian aircraft 13,560 men[j]
332–c. 500 tanks
111 guns
77 British and 20 US aircraft[14]
[show]
v
t
e
Western Desert Campaign
Invasion of Egypt
Compass
Nibeiwa
Sidi Barrani
Bardia
Mechili
Beda Fomm
Kufra
Giarabub
Sonnenblume
Tobruk
Bardia raid
Twin Pimples
Brevity
Skorpion
Battleaxe
Crusader
Flipper
1st Bir el Gubi
Point 175
2nd Bir el Gubi
Gazala
Bir Hakeim
Mersa Matruh
1st Alamein
Sidi Haneish
Alam Halfa
Agreement
Caravan
Bertram
Braganza
2nd Alamein
Outpost Snipe
El Agheila
Associated articles
Frontier Wire
Devil's gardens
Fort Capuzzo
Maletti Group
Camouflage
Babini Group
Combeforce
3rd Indian Motor Brigade
Baggush Box
The Second Battle of El Alamein (23 October – 11 November 1942) was a battle of the Second World War that took place near the Egyptian railway halt of El Alamein. With the Allies victorious, it was the watershed of the Western Desert Campaign. The First Battle of El Alamein had prevented the Axis from advancing further into Egypt. In August 1942, Lieutenant-General Sir Bernard Law Montgomery took command of the Eighth Army following the sacking of General Claude Auchinleck and the death of his replacement Lieutenant-General William Gott in an air crash.
The Allied victory turned the tide in the North African Campaign and ended the Axis threat to Egypt, the Suez Canal and the Middle Eastern and Persian oil fields via North Africa. The Second Battle of El Alamein revived the morale of the Allies, being the first big success against the Axis since Operation Crusader in late 1941. The battle coincided with the Allied invasion of French North Africa in Operation Torch, which started on 8 November, the Battle of Stalingrad and the Guadalcanal Campaign.
Contents
[hide]
1 Background
2 Prelude
2.1 Allied plan
2.1.1 Operation Lightfoot
2.1.2 Operation Bertram
2.1.3 Operation Braganza
2.2 Axis plan
3 Battle
3.1 Phase one: the break-in
3.2 Phase two: the crumbling
3.2.1 D + 2: 25 October
3.3 Phase three: the counter
3.3.1 D + 3: 26 October
3.3.2 D + 4: 27 October
3.3.3 D + 5–6: 28–29 October
3.3.4 D + 7–9: 30 October – 1 November
3.4 Phase four: Operation Supercharge
3.4.1 D + 10: 2 November
3.4.2 D + 11: 3 November
3.5 Phase five: the break-out
3.5.1 D + 12, 4 November
3.5.2 D + 13, 5 November
3.5.3 D + 14, 6 November
3.5.4 D + 15–18, 7–11 November
4 Aftermath
4.1 Analysis
4.2 Casualties
4.3 Subsequent operations
4.3.1 Battle of El Agheila
4.3.2 Tripoli
4.3.3 Tunisia
5 See also
6 Notes
7 Footnotes
8 References
9 Further reading
10 External links
Background[edit]
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2016) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Further information: Second Battle of El Alamein order of battle
Erwin Rommel (left) in his command halftrack, SdKfz.250/3.
The Panzer Army Africa (Panzerarmee Afrika), composed of German and Italian infantry and mechanised units under Generalfeldmarschall Erwin Rommel, had struck deep into Egypt by 12 July 1942 after its success at the Battle of Gazala. This threatened the British Empire's control of the Suez Canal and Mandatory Palestine. General Claude Auchinleck withdrew the Eighth Army to within 80 kilometres (50 mi) of Alexandria to a point where the Qattara Depression came to within 64 kilometres (40 mi) of El Alamein on the coast. This gave the defenders a short front to defend and provided secure flanks because tanks could not traverse the Depression. The Axis advance was halted here in early July in the First Battle of El Alamein.
The Eighth Army counter-offensives during July failed, as Rommel had dug in to allow his exhausted troops to regroup. Auchinleck called off all offensive action at the end of July to allow rebuilding the Eighth Army's strength. In early August, the British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, and General Sir Alan Brooke—the Chief of the Imperial General Staff (CIGS)—visited Cairo and replaced Auchinleck as Commander-in-chief (C-in-C) Middle East Command with General Sir Harold Alexander. Lieutenant-General William Gott was appointed to command of the Eighth Army, but he was killed when the transport plane he was travelling in was shot down by Luftwaffe fighters; Lieutenant-General Bernard Montgomery was then appointed commander of the Eighth Army.
Faced with long supply lines and lacking reinforcements, and well aware of massive Allied reinforcements in men and materiel on the way, Rommel decided to strike the Allies while their build-up was incomplete. The two armoured divisions of the Afrika Korps, together with a force made up of the reconnaissance units of Panzer Army Africa, led the attack but the Allies stopped them at the Alam el Halfa ridge and Point 102 on 30 August 1942. The attack failed in this second battle at the Alamein line, better known as the Battle of Alam el Halfa (commonly, but incorrectly, Alam Halfa); expecting a counter-attack by Montgomery's Eighth Army, Panzer Army Africa dug in.
The factors that had favoured the Eighth Army's defensive plan in the First Battle of El Alamein, the short front line and the secure flanks, now favoured the Axis defence. Rommel, furthermore, had plenty of time to prepare his defensive positions and lay extensive minefields (laying approximately 500,000 mines) and barbed wire.[15] Alexander and Montgomery were determined to establish a superiority of forces sufficient not only to achieve a breakthrough but also to exploit it and destroy Panzer Army Africa. In all the previous swings of the pendulum in the Western Desert Campaign since 1941, neither side had ever had the strength after achieving victory in an offensive battle to exploit it decisively: the losing side had always been able to withdraw and regroup closer to its main supply bases.
The British had an intelligence advantage: signals intelligence from Ultra and local sources exposed the Axis order of battle, its supply position, force disposition and intentions. A reorganisation of the intelligence function in Africa in July had also improved the integration of intelligence received from all sources and the speed of its dissemination.[16] With rare exceptions, intelligence identified the supply ships destined for North Africa, their location or routing and in most cases their cargoes, allowing them to be attacked.[17] By 25 October, Panzer Army fuel stocks were down to three days' supply, of which only two days' worth were east of Tobruk. "The Panzer Army... did not possess the operational freedom of movement that was absolutely essential in consideration of the fact that the British offensive can be expected to start any day".[18]
Submarine and air transport somewhat eased the shortage of ammunition and by late October, stocks amounting to 16 days supply were held in forward areas.[18] After six more weeks, the Eighth Army was ready, 195,000 men and 1,029 tanks began the offensive against the 116,000 men and 547 tanks of Panzer Army Africa.
Prelude[edit]
Allied plan[edit]
Operation Lightfoot[edit]
Montgomery's plan was for a main attack to the north of the line and a secondary attack to the south, involving XXX Corps (Lieutenant-General Oliver Leese) and XIII Corps (Lieutenant-General Brian Horrocks), while X Corps (Lieutenant-General Herbert Lumsden) was to exploit the success.[19] With Operation Lightfoot, Montgomery intended to cut two corridors through the Axis minefields in the north. One corridor was to run south-west through the 2nd New Zealand Division sector towards the centre of Miteirya Ridge, while the second was to run west, passing 2 mi (3.2 km) north of the west end of the Miteirya Ridge across the 9th Australian and 51st (Highland) Division sectors.[20] Tanks would then pass through and defeat the German armour. Diversions at Ruweisat Ridge in the centre and also the south of the line would keep the rest of the Axis forces from moving northwards. Montgomery expected a 12-day battle in three stages: the break-in, the dogfight and the final breaking of the enemy.[21]
For the first night of the offensive, Montgomery planned for four infantry divisions of XXX Corps to advance on a 16 mi (26 km) front to the Oxalic Line, over-running the forward Axis defences. Engineers would clear and mark the two lanes through the minefields, through which the armoured divisions from X Corps would pass to gain the Pierson Line. They would rally and consolidate their position just west of the infantry positions, blocking an Axis tank counter-attack. The British tanks would then advance to Skinflint, astride the north–south Rahman Track deep in the Axis defensive system, to challenge the Axis armour.[20] The infantry battle would continue as the Eighth Army infantry "crumbled" the deep Axis defensive fortifications (three successive lines of fortification had been constructed) and destroy any tanks that attacked them.[22][k]
Operation Bertram[edit]
Main article: Operation Bertram
The Commonwealth forces practised a number of deceptions in the months before the battle to confuse the Axis command as to the whereabouts of the forthcoming battle and when the battle was likely to occur. This operation was codenamed Operation Bertram. In September, they dumped waste materials (discarded packing cases, etc.) under camouflage nets in the northern sector, making them appear to be ammunition or ration dumps. The Axis naturally noticed these but, as no offensive action immediately followed and the "dumps" did not change in appearance, they were subsequently ignored. This allowed Eighth Army to build up supplies in the forward area unnoticed by the Axis, by replacing the rubbish with ammunition, petrol or rations at night. Meanwhile, a dummy pipeline was built, hopefully leading the Axis to believe the attack would occur much later than it, in fact, did and much further south. To further the illusion, dummy tanks consisting of plywood frames placed over jeeps were constructed and deployed in the south. In a reverse feint, the tanks destined for battle in the north were disguised as supply trucks by placing removable plywood superstructures over them.[24]
Operation Braganza[edit]
Main article: Operation Braganza
As a preliminary, the 131st (Queen's) Infantry Brigade of the 44th (Home Counties) Infantry Division, supported by tanks from the 4th Armoured Brigade, launched Operation Braganza attacking the 185th Airborne Division Folgore on the night of 29/30 September in an attempt to capture the Deir el Munassib area. The Italian paratroopers repelled the attack, killing or capturing over 300 of the attackers.[25] It was wrongly assumed that Fallschirmjäger (German paratroopers) had manned the defences and been responsible for the British reverse. The Afrika Korps war diary notes that the Italian paratroops "bore the brunt of the attack. It fought well and inflicted heavy losses on the enemy."[26]
Axis plan[edit]
Deployment of forces on the eve of battle.
With the failure of their offensive at Alam el Halfa, the Axis forces were now on the defensive, but losses had not been excessive. German and Italian supply lines were over-stretched; the Axis had been relying on captured Allied supplies and equipment that had long since been consumed. Rommel had been advised by both the German and Italian staffs that his army could not be properly supplied so far from the ports of Tripoli and Benghazi. Despite these warnings, Rommel pressed ahead with his advance to Alamein and as predicted, the supply echelons could not deliver the required supplies from the ports to the front.[27] On the other hand, the British Commonwealth forces were being re-supplied with men and materials from the United Kingdom, India, Australia and New Zealand, as well as with trucks and the newly-introduced Sherman tanks from the United States. Rommel continued to request equipment, supplies and fuel, but the main focus of the German war machine was on the Eastern Front, and very limited supplies reached North Africa.
Georg Stumme in 1940.
Furthermore, Rommel was ill. In early September, arrangements were made for him to return to Germany on sick leave and for General der Panzertruppe Georg Stumme to transfer from the Russian front to take his place. Before he left for Germany on 23 September, Rommel organised the planned defence and wrote a long appreciation of the situation to the German High Command, once again setting out the essential needs of the Panzer Army.[28]
Rommel knew that the British Commonwealth forces would soon be strong enough to launch an offensive against his army. His only hope now relied on the German forces fighting in the Battle of Stalingrad to quickly defeat the Soviet forces and moving south through the Trans-Caucasus and threatening Iran (Persia) and the Middle East. This would require large numbers of British Commonwealth forces to be sent from the Egyptian front to reinforce British forces in Iran, leading to the postponement of any offensive against his army. Using this delay, Rommel hoped to convince the German High Command to reinforce his forces for the eventual link-up between Panzer Army Africa and the German armies battling their way through southern Russia, enabling them finally to defeat the British and Commonwealth armies in North Africa and the Middle East.
In the meantime, his forces dug in and waited for the eventual attack by the British Commonwealth forces or the defeat of the Soviet Army at Stalingrad. Rommel added depth to his defences by creating at least two belts of mines about 3.1 mi (5 km) apart which were connected at intervals to create boxes which would restrict enemy penetration and deprive British armour of room for manoeuvre. The front face of each box was lightly held by battle outposts and the rest of the box was unoccupied but sowed with mines and explosive traps and covered by enfilading fire.[29] These became known as the Devil's gardens. The main defensive positions were built to a depth of at least 2 kilometres (1.2 mi) behind the second mine belt.[30] The Axis laid around half a million mines, mostly Teller anti-tank mines with some smaller anti-personnel types (such as the S-mine). (Many of these mines were British, and had been captured at Tobruk). To lure enemy vehicles into the minefields, the Italians had a trick of dragging an axle and tyres through the fields using a long rope to create what appeared to be well-used tracks.[15]
Rommel was concerned with not letting the British armour break out into the open because he had neither the strength of numbers nor fuel to match them in a battle of manoeuvre. He therefore had to try to restrict the battle to his defended zones and counter any breakthrough both quickly and vigorously. Rommel therefore stiffened his forward lines by alternating German and Italian infantry formations. Because the Allied deception measures had confused the Axis as to their likely point of attack, Rommel departed from his usual practice of holding his armoured strength in a single concentrated reserve and split it into a northern group (15th Panzer and Littorio Division) and a southern group (21st Panzer and Ariete Division), each organised into battle groups in order to be able to make a quick armoured intervention wherever the blow fell and so prevent any narrow breakthroughs from being enlarged. The effect, however, was that a significant proportion of his armoured reserve was dispersed and held unusually far forward. The 15th Panzer Division had 125 operational tanks (16 Pz.IIs, 43 Pz.III Ausf H, 43 Pz.III Ausf J, 6 Pz.IV Ausf D, 15 Pz.IV Ausf F) while the 21st Panzer Division had 121 operational combat vehicles (12 Pz.IIs, 38 Pz.III Ausf H, 43 Pz.III Ausf J, 2 Pz.IV Ausf D, 15 Pz.IV Ausf F)[31] Further back, however, Rommel did have the 90th Light and Trieste Motorised Divisions in reserve near the coast.[32] Rommel believed that when the main thrust came, he could manoeuvre his troops faster than the Allies to concentrate his defences at the battle's centre of gravity. However, having concentrated his defence, he would not be able to move his forces again because of lack of fuel.[33]
As a result of their intelligence advantage, the British were well aware that Rommel would be unable to mount a defence based on his usual battle-of-manoeuvre tactics. However, no clear picture emerged of how he would fight the battle and, in the event, British plans seriously underestimated the Axis defences and the Panzer Army's power of resistance.[34]
Battle[edit]
The Battle of El Alamein is usually divided into five phases, consisting of the break-in (23–24 October), the crumbling (24–25 October), the counter (26–28 October), Operation Supercharge (1–2 November) and the break-out (3–7 November). No name is given to the period from 29–31 October, when the battle was at a standstill.
Phase one: the break-in[edit]
British night artillery barrage which opened the second Battle of El Alamein
Prior to the main barrage, there was a diversion by the 24th Australian Brigade, which involved the 15th Panzer Division being subjected to heavy fire for a few minutes.[35] Then at 21:40 (Egyptian Summer Time) on 23 October[36] on a calm, clear evening under the bright sky of a full moon, Operation Lightfoot began with a 1,000-gun barrage. The fire plan had been arranged so that the first rounds from the 882 guns from the field and medium batteries would land along the 40 mi (64 km) front at the same time.[37] After 20 minutes of general bombardment, the guns switched to precision targets in support of the advancing infantry.[38] The shelling plan continued for five and a half hours, by the end of which each gun had fired about 600 rounds, about 529,000 shells.
Operation Lightfoot alluded to the infantry attacking first. Anti-tank mines would not be tripped by soldiers stepping on them since they were too light. As the infantry advanced, engineers had to clear a path for the tanks coming behind. Each gap was to be 24 ft (7.3 m) wide, which was just enough to get tanks through in single file. The engineers had to clear a 5 mi (8.0 km) route through the Devil's Gardens. It was a difficult task that was not achieved because of the depth of the Axis minefields.
Kittyhawk Mark III, of No. 250 Squadron RAF taxiing at LG 91, Egypt, during Operation Lightfoot
At 22:00, the four infantry divisions of XXX Corps began to move. The objective was to establish a bridgehead before dawn at the imaginary line in the desert where the strongest enemy defences were situated, on the far side of the second mine belt. Once the infantry reached the first minefields, the mine sweepers, including Reconnaissance Corps troops and sappers, moved in to create a passage for the armoured divisions of X Corps. Progress was slower than planned but at 02:00, the first of the 500 tanks crawled forward. By 04:00, the lead tanks were in the minefields, where they stirred up so much dust that there was no visibility at all, traffic jams developed and tanks bogged down. Only about half of the infantry attained their objectives and none of the tanks broke through.[39]
Original military uniform of an Italian paratrooper of the division Folgore in 1942
The 7th Armoured Division (with one Free French Brigade under command) from XIII Corps (Lieutenant-General Brian Horrocks) made a secondary attack to the south. The main attack aimed to achieve a breakthrough, engage and pin down the 21st Panzer Division and the Ariete Armoured Division around Jebel Kalakh, while the Free French on the far left were to secure Qaret el Himeimat and the el Taqa plateau.[20] The right flank of the attack was to be protected by 44th Infantry Division with the 131st Infantry Brigade. The attack met determined resistance, mainly from the 185 Airborne Division Folgore, part of the Ramcke Parachute Brigade and the Keil Group.[40][41] The minefields were deeper than anticipated and clearing paths through them was impeded by Axis defensive fire. By dawn on 24 October, paths still had not been cleared through the second minefield to release 22nd and 4th Light Armoured Brigades into the open to make their planned turn north into the rear of enemy positions 5 mi (8.0 km) west of Deir el Munassib.[20]
Further north along the XIII Corps front, the 50th Infantry Division achieved a limited and costly success against determined resistance from the Pavia Division, Brescia Division and elements of the 185th Airborne Division Folgore.[42] The 4th Indian Infantry Division, on the far left of the XXX Corps front at Ruweisat Ridge, made a mock attack and two small raids intended to deflect attention to the centre of the front.[43]
Phase two: the crumbling[edit]
A mine explodes close to a British artillery tractor as it advances through enemy minefields and wire to the new front line
Dawn aerial reconnaissance showed little change in Axis disposition, so Montgomery gave his orders for the day: the clearance of the northern corridor should be completed and the New Zealand Division supported by 10th Armoured should push south from Miteirya Ridge. 9th Australian Division, in the north, should plan a crumbling operation for that night, while in the southern sector, 7th Armoured should continue to try to break through the minefields with support, if necessary, from 44th Division.[44] Panzer units counter-attacked the 51st Highland Division just after sunrise, only to be stopped in their tracks.
British tanks advance to engage German armour after infantry had opened gaps in the Axis minefield at El Alamein, 24 October 1942
The morning of Saturday 24 October brought disaster for the German headquarters. The reports that Stumme had received that morning showed the attacks had been on a broad front but that such penetration as had occurred should be containable by local units. He went forward himself to observe the state of affairs and, finding himself under fire, suffered a heart attack and died. Temporary command was given to Major-General Wilhelm Ritter von Thoma. Hitler had already decided that Rommel should leave his sanatorium and return to North Africa. Rommel flew to Rome early on 25 October to press the Comando Supremo for more fuel and ammunition and then on to North Africa to resume command that night of the Panzer Army Africa, which that day was renamed the German-Italian Panzer Army (Deutsch-Italienische Panzerarmee).[45]
There was little activity during the day pending more complete clearance of paths through the minefields. The armour was held at Oxalic.[21] Artillery and the Allied Desert Air Force, making over 1,000 sorties,[44] attacked Axis positions all day to aid the 'crumbling' of the Axis forces. By 16:00 there was little progress.
At dusk, with the sun at their backs, Axis tanks from the 15th Panzer Division and Italian Littorio Division swung out from the Kidney feature (also known to the Germans and Italians as Hill 28), often wrongly called a ridge as it was actually a depression, to engage the 1st Armoured Division and the first major tank battle of El Alamein began. Over 100 tanks were involved and half were destroyed by dark. Neither position was altered.[citation needed]
At around 10:00, Axis aircraft had destroyed a convoy of 25 Allied vehicles carrying petrol and ammunition, setting off a night-long blaze; Lumsden wanted to call off the attack, but Montgomery made it clear that his plans were to be carried out.[46] The thrust that night by 10th Armoured Division from Miteirya Ridge failed. The lifting of mines on the Miteirya Ridge and beyond took far longer than planned and the leading unit, 8th Armoured Brigade, was caught on their start line at 22:00—zero hour—by an air attack and were scattered. By the time they had reorganised they were well behind schedule and out of touch with the creeping artillery barrage. By daylight the brigade was out in the open taking considerable fire from well sited tanks and anti-tank guns. Meanwhile 24th Armoured Brigade had pushed forward and reported at dawn they were on the Pierson line, although it turned out that, in the dust and confusion, they had mistaken their position and were well short.[47]
The attack in the XIII Corps sector to the south fared no better. 44th Division's 131st Infantry Brigade cleared a path through the mines, but when 22nd Armoured Brigade passed through, they came under heavy fire and were repulsed, with 31 tanks disabled. Allied air activity that night focused on Rommel's northern armoured group, where 135 short tons (122 t) of bombs were dropped. To prevent a recurrence of 8th Armoured Brigade's experience from the air, attacks on Axis landing fields were also stepped up.[47]
D + 2: 25 October[edit]
The initial thrust had ended by Sunday. The Allies had advanced through the minefields in the west to make a 6 mi (9.7 km) wide and 5 mi (8.0 km) deep inroad. They now sat atop Miteirya Ridge in the south-east. Axis forces were firmly entrenched in most of their original battle positions and the battle was at a standstill. Montgomery decided that the planned advance southward from Miteirya Ridge by the New Zealanders would be too costly and instead decided that XXX Corps—while keeping firm hold of Miteirya—should strike northward toward the coast with 9th Australian Division. Meanwhile, 1st Armoured Division—on the Australians' left—should continue to attack west and north-west, and activity to the south on both Corps fronts would be confined to patrolling.[48] The battle would be concentrated at the Kidney feature and Tel el Eisa until a breakthrough occurred.
RAF Baltimore of No. 223 Squadron bombing El Daba airfield in support of the Alamein offensive
By early morning, the Axis forces launched a series of attacks using 15th Panzer and Littorio divisions. The Panzer Army was probing for a weakness, but without success. When the sun set the Allied infantry went on the attack. Around midnight, 51st Division launched three attacks, but no one knew exactly where they were. Pandemonium and carnage ensued, resulting in the loss of over 500 Allied troops, and leaving only one officer among the attacking forces.[citation needed]
While the 51st Highland Division was operating around Kidney, the Australians were attacking Point 29,[l] a 20 ft (6.1 m) high Axis artillery observation post south-west of Tel el Eisa, in an attempt to surround the Axis coastal salient containing the German 164th Light Division and large numbers of Italian infantry.[50] This was the new northern thrust Montgomery had devised earlier in the day, and was to be the scene of heated battle for some days. The Australian 26th Brigade attacked at midnight, supported by artillery and 30 tanks of 40th Royal Tank Regiment.[51] They took the position and 240 prisoners. Fighting continued in this area for the next week, as the Axis tried to recover the small hill that was so important to their defence.
Meanwhile, the air force night bombers dropped 115 short tons (104 t)[clarification needed] of bombs on targets in the battlefield and 14 short tons (13 t) on the Stuka base at Sidi Haneish, while night fighters flew patrols over the battle area and the Axis forward landing grounds.[51] In the south, the 4th Armoured Brigade and 69th Infantry Brigade attacked the Folgore (187th regiment) at Deir Munassib, but lost about 20 tanks gaining only the forward positions.[52][53]
Phase three: the counter[edit]
D + 3: 26 October[edit]
A British soldier gives a V gesture to German prisoners captured at El Alamein, 26 October 1942
Rommel, on his return to North Africa on the evening of 25 October, immediately assessed the battle. Casualties, particularly in the north, as a result of incessant artillery and air attack, had been heavy. He found that the Italian Trento Division had lost 50% of its infantry and most of its artillery, 164th Light Division had lost two battalions and although the 15th Panzer and Littorio Divisions had held off the Allied armour, this had proved costly;[45] 15th Panzer had a mere 31 tanks remaining.[54] Most other units were under strength, all men were on half rations, a large number were sick, and the entire Axis army had only enough fuel for three days.[18]
Rommel was convinced by this time that the main assault would come in the north[55] and determined to retake Point 29. He ordered a counter-attack against it by 15th Panzer, 164th Light Divisions and elements of Italian XX Corps to begin at 15:00 but (according to the British official history) under heavy artillery and air attack this came to nothing.[56] According to Rommel this attack did meet some success, with the Italians recapturing part of what he calls Hill 28: "Attacks were now launched on Hill 28 by elements of the 15th Panzer Division, the Littorio and a Bersaglieri Battalion, supported by the concentrated fire of all the local artillery and AA. In the evening part of the Bersaglieri Battalion succeeded in occupying the eastern and western edges of the hill".[57]
The bulk of the Australian 2/17th Battalion, which had defended the position, was in fact forced to pull back.[58] During the day, Rommel reversed his policy of distributing his armour across the front, ordering 90th Light Division forward from Ed Daba and 21st Panzer north along with one third of the Ariete Division and half the artillery from the southern sector to concentrate with 15th Panzer and Littorio in the north[59] at what was becoming the focal point of the battle. The Trieste Division were ordered from Fuka to replace 90th Light at Ed Daba. 21st Panzer and the Ariete made slow progress during the night as they were heavily bombed.[60] Rommel was aware that having moved 21st Panzer north he would be unable to move it back south because of a lack of fuel.[59]
Back at the Kidney feature, the British failed to take advantage of the missing tanks. Each time they tried to move forward they were stopped by anti-tank guns. The Allied offensive was stalled. Churchill railed, "Is it really impossible to find a general who can win a battle?"[61]
On a brighter note for the British, three Vickers Wellington torpedo night bombers of No.38 Squadron destroyed the oil tanker Tergestea at Tobruk[62] and Bristol Beaufort torpedo bombers of No. 42 Squadron RAF, attached to No. 47 Squadron, sank the tanker Proserpina at Tobruk, removing the last hope for refuelling Rommel's army. Rommel himself noted in his diary that with the sinking of Tergestea and Proserpina the battle was lost.[citation needed]
Montgomery was concerned that the impetus of the offensive was waning. Although by 26 October XXX Corps' infantry had completed the capture of the planned bridgehead west of the second mine belt, the armour of X Corps, although established just beyond the infantry, had failed to break through the enemy's anti-tank defences.[39] He therefore decided that over the next two days, while continuing the process of attrition, he would thin out his front line to create a reserve with which to restore his momentum. The reserve was to include the New Zealand Division (with 9th Armoured Brigade under command), 10th Armoured Division and 7th Armoured Division.[63] The attacks in the south, which lasted three days and caused considerable losses without achieving a breakthrough, were suspended.
D + 4: 27 October[edit]
Main article: Outpost Snipe
Tanks of 8th Armoured Brigade waiting just behind the forward positions near El Alamein before being called to join the battle, 27 October 1942
By this time, the main battle was concentrated around Tel el Aqqaqir and the Kidney feature at the end of 1st Armoured Division's path through the minefield. A mile north-west of the feature was Outpost Woodcock and roughly the same distance south-west lay Outpost Snipe. An attack was planned on these areas using two battalions from 7th Motor Brigade. At 23:00 on 26 October 2 Battalion, The Rifle Brigade would attack Snipe and 2nd Battalion King's Royal Rifle Corps (KRRC) would attack Woodcock. The plan was for 2nd Armoured Brigade to pass round the north of Woodcock the following dawn and 24th Armoured Brigade round the south of Snipe. The attack was to be supported by all the available artillery of both X and XXX Corps.[64]
Both battalions had difficulty finding their way in the dark and dust. At dawn, the KRRC had not reached its objective and had to find cover and dig in some distance from Woodcock. 2nd Rifle Brigade had had better fortune and after following the shell bursts of the supporting artillery dug in when they concluded they had reached their objective having encountered little opposition.[65]
At 06:00, the 2nd Armoured Brigade commenced its advance and ran into such stiff opposition that, by noon, it had still not linked with the KRRC. The 24th Armoured Brigade started a little later and was soon in contact with the Rifle Brigade (having shelled them in error for a while). Some hours of confused fighting ensued involving tanks from the Littorio and troops and anti-tank guns from 15th Panzer which managed to keep the British armour at bay in spite of the support of the Rifle Brigade battlegroup's anti-tank guns. Rommel had decided to make two counter-attacks using his fresh troops. 90th Light Division was to make a fresh attempt to capture Point 29 and 21st Panzer were targeted at Snipe (the Ariete detachment had returned south).[66]
At Snipe, mortar and shellfire was constant all day long. At 16:00, Rommel launched his major attack. German and Italian tanks moved forward. Against them the Rifle Brigade had 13 6-pounder anti-tank guns along with six more from the supporting 239th Anti-Tank Battery, RA. Although on the point of being overrun more than once they held their ground, destroying 22 German and 10 Italian tanks. The Germans gave up but in error the British battle group was withdrawn without being replaced that evening. Its CO, Lieutenant-Colonel Victor Buller Turner was awarded the Victoria Cross.[67] Only one anti-tank gun—from 239 Battery—was brought back.[68]
When it was discovered that neither Woodcock nor Snipe was in Eighth Army hands, 133rd Lorried Infantry Brigade was sent to capture them. By 01:30 on 28 October, the 4th battalion Royal Sussex Regiment judged they were on Woodcock and dug in. At dawn, 2nd Armoured Brigade moved up in support but before contact could be made 4th Royal Sussex were counter-attacked and overrun with many losses. Meanwhile, the Lorried Brigade's two other battalions had moved on Snipe and dug in, only to find out the next day that they were in fact well short of their objective.[69]
Further north, the 90th Light Division's attack on Point 29 during the afternoon of 27 October failed under heavy artillery and bombing which broke up the attack before it had closed with the Australians. The action at Snipe was an episode of the Battle of El Alamein described by the regiment's historian as the most famous day of the regiment's war.[70] Lucas-Phillips, in his Alamein records that:
The desert was quivering with heat. The gun detachments and the platoons squatted in their pits and trenches, the sweat running in rivers down their dust-caked faces. There was a terrible stench. The flies swarmed in black clouds upon the dead bodies and excreta and tormented the wounded. The place was strewn with burning tanks and carriers, wrecked guns and vehicles, and over all drifted the smoke and the dust from bursting high explosives and from the blasts of guns.
—  Lucas-Phillips, sfn, Lucas-Phillips
D + 5–6: 28–29 October[edit]
A Valentine tank in North Africa, carrying British infantry
On 28 October, 15th and 21st Panzer made a determined attack on the X Corps front but were halted by sustained artillery, tank and anti-tank gun fire. In the afternoon, they paused to regroup to attack again but they were bombed for two and a half hours and were prevented from even forming up.[71] This proved to be Rommel's last attempt to take the initiative and as such his defeat here represented a turning point in the battle.[72]
At this point, Montgomery ordered the X Corps formations in the Woodcock-Snipe area to go over to defence while he focused his army's attack further to the north. Late on 27 October, the British 133rd Brigade was sent forward to recover lost positions but the next day, a good part of this force was overrun by German and Italian tanks from the Littorio and supporting 12th Bersaglieri Regiment and several hundred British soldiers were captured.[73] On the night of 28/29 October, the 9th Australian Division was ordered to make a second set-piece attack. The 20th Australian Infantry Brigade with 40th R.T.R. in support would push north-west from Point 29 to form a base for 26th Australian Infantry Brigade with 46th R.T.R. in support, to attack north-east to an Axis location south of the railway known as Thompson's Post and then over the railway to the coast road, where they would advance south-east to close on the rear of the Axis troops in the coastal salient. An attack by the third brigade would then be launched on the salient from the south-east.[74]
The 20th Brigade took its objectives with little trouble but 26th Brigade had more trouble. Because of the distances involved, the troops were riding on 46th R.T.R. Valentine tanks as well as carriers, which mines and anti-tank guns soon brought to grief, forcing the infantry to dismount. The infantry and tanks lost touch with each other in fighting with the 125th Panzergrenadier Regiment and a battalion of 7th Bersaglieri Regiment sent to reinforce the sector and the advance came to a halt.[74] The Australians suffered 200 casualties in that attack and suffered 27 killed and 290 wounded.[75] The German and Italian forces that had participated in the counter-attack formed an outpost and held on until the arrival of German reinforcements on 1 November.
British Grant tank moving up to the front, 29 October 1942
It became clear that there were no longer enough hours of darkness left to reform, continue the attack and see it to its conclusion, so the operation was called off. By the end of these engagements in late October, the British had 800 tanks still in operation, while the Panzerarmee day report for 28 October (intercepted and read by Eighth Army the following evening) recorded 81 serviceable German tanks and 197 Italian.[72] With the help of signals intelligence information the Proserpina (carrying 4,500 tonnes of fuel) and Tergestea (carrying 1,000 tonnes of fuel and 1,000 tonnes of ammunition) had been destroyed on 26 October and the tanker Luisiano (carrying 2,500 tonnes of fuel) had been sunk off the west coast of Greece by a torpedo from a Wellington bomber on 28 October.[76] Rommel told his commanders, "It will be quite impossible for us to disengage from the enemy. There is no gasoline for such a manoeuvre. We have only one choice and that is to fight to the end at Alamein."[77]
These actions by the Australians and British had alerted Montgomery that Rommel had committed his reserve in the form of 90th Light Division to the front and that its presence in the coastal sector suggested that Rommel was expecting the next major Eighth Army offensive in this sector. Montgomery determined therefore that it would take place further south on a 4,000 yd (2.3 mi; 3.7 km) front south of Point 29. The attack was to take place on the night of 31 October/1 November, as soon as he had completed the reorganisation of his front line to create the reserves needed for the offensive (although in the event it was postponed by 24 hours). To keep Rommel's attention on the coastal sector, Montgomery ordered the renewal of the 9th Australian Division operation on the night of 30/31 October.[78]
D + 7–9: 30 October – 1 November[edit]
Montgomery watches Allied tanks advance (November 1942)
The night of 30 October saw a continuation of previous Australian plans, their third attempt to reach the paved road. Although not all the objectives were achieved, by the end of the night they were astride the road and the railway, making the position of the Axis troops in the salient precarious. Rommel brought up a battlegroup from 21. Panzer-Division and on 31 October, launched four successive attacks against "Thompson's Post". The fighting was intense and often hand-to-hand, but no ground was gained by the Axis forces. One of the Australians killed was Sergeant William Kibby (2/48th Infantry Battalion) who, for his heroic actions from the 23rd until his death on the 31st – including a lone attack on a machine-gun position at his own initiative – was awarded the Victoria Cross.[79]
Again, on Sunday, 1 November Rommel tried to dislodge the Australians, but the brutal, desperate fighting resulted in nothing but lost men and equipment. He did however regain contact with Panzergrenadier-Regiment 125 in the nose of the salient,[80] and the supporting 10° battaglione Bersaglieri – that fought well according to German and Allied sources; the Bersaglieri had resisted several Australian attacks even though they were (in the words of military historian Niall Barr) "surrounded on all sides, short of ammunition, food and water, [and] unable to evacuate their many wounded".[81]
By now, it had become obvious to Rommel that the battle was lost. His fuel state continued to be critical: on 1 November, two more supply ships—the Tripolino and the Ostia—had been torpedoed and sunk from the air north-west of Tobruk. The shortage forced him to rely increasingly on fuel flown in from Crete on the orders of Albert Kesselring, Luftwaffe Oberbefehlshaber Süd (OB Süd, Supreme Commander South), despite the restrictions imposed by heavy bombing of the airfields in Crete and the Desert Air Force's efforts to intercept the transport aircraft.[82]
Rommel began to plan a retreat anticipating retiring to Fuka, some 50 mi (80 km) west, as he had only 90 tanks remaining in stark contrast with the Allies' 800.[54] Ironically, large amounts of fuel arrived at Benghazi after the German forces had started to retreat, but little of it reached the front, a fact Kesselring tried to change by delivering it more closely to the fighting forces.[83]
Phase four: Operation Supercharge[edit]
D + 10: 2 November[edit]
A Priest 105 mm self-propelled gun of the 1st Armoured Division preparing for action, 2 November 1942
This phase of the battle began at 01:00 on 2 November, with the objective of destroying enemy armour, forcing the enemy to fight in the open, reducing the Axis stock of petrol, attacking and occupying enemy supply routes, and causing the disintegration of the enemy army. The intensity and the destruction in Supercharge were greater than anything witnessed so far during this battle. The objective of this operation was Tel el Aqqaqir, the base of the Axis defence roughly 3 mi (4.8 km) north-west of the Kidney feature and situated on the Rahman lateral track.[84]
The initial thrust of Supercharge was to be carried out by 2nd New Zealand Division. The division's commander — Lieutenant-General Sir Bernard Freyberg — had tried to free them of this task, as they had lost 1,405 men in just three days, at El Ruweisat Ridge in July. However, in addition to its own 5th New Zealand Infantry Brigade and 28th (Maori) Infantry Battalion, the division was to have had placed under its command 151st (Durham) Brigade from 50th Division, 152nd (Seaforth and Camerons) Brigade from 51st Division and the 133rd Royal Sussex Lorried Infantry Brigade. In addition, the division was to have British 9th Armoured Brigade under command.[85]
As in Operation Lightfoot, it was planned that two infantry brigades (the 151st on the right and 152nd on the left) each this time supported by a regiment of tanks—the 8th and 50th Royal Tank Regiments—would advance and clear a path through the mines. Once they reached their objectives, 4,000 yd (3,700 m) distant, 9th Armoured Brigade would pass through supported by a heavy artillery barrage and break open a gap in the Axis defences on and around the Rahman track, some 2,000 yd (1,800 m) further forward, which the 1st Armoured Division, following behind, would pass through into the open to take on Rommel's armoured reserves.[86] Rommel had ordered 21st Panzer Division from the front line on 31 October to form a mobile counterattacking force. The division had left behind a panzergrenadier regiment which would bolster the Trieste Division which had been ordered forward to replace it. Rommel had also interspersed formations from the Trieste and 15th Panzer Divisions to "corset" his weaker forces in the front line. On 1 November the two German armoured divisions had 102 effective tanks to face Supercharge and the Littorio and Trieste Divisions had 65 tanks between them.[87]
Supercharge started with a seven-hour aerial bombardment focused on Tel el Aqqaqir and Sidi Abd el Rahman, followed by a four and a half hour barrage of 360 guns firing 15,000 shells.[citation needed] The two assault brigades started their attack at 01:05 on 2 November and gained most of their objectives to schedule and with moderate losses. On the right of the main attack 28th (Maori) battalion captured positions to protect the right flank of the newly formed salient and 133rd Lorried Infantry did the same on the left. New Zealand engineers cleared five lines through the mines allowing the Royal Dragoons armoured car regiment to slip out into the open and spend the day raiding the Axis communications.[88]
The 9th Armoured Brigade had started its approach march at 20:00 on 1 November from El Alamein railway station with around 130 tanks and arrived at its start line with only 94 runners (operational tanks). The brigade was to have started its attack towards Tel el Aqqaqir at 05:45 behind a barrage; the attack was postponed for 30 minutes while the brigade regrouped on Currie's orders.[89] At 06:15, 30 minutes before dawn, the three regiments of the brigade advanced towards the gun line.[90]
We all realise that for armour to attack a wall of guns sounds like another Balaclava, it is properly an infantry job. But there are no more infantry available. So our armour must do it.
—  Lieutenant General Sir Bernard Freyberg[91]
Brigadier Currie had tried to get the brigade out of doing this job, stating that he believed the brigade would be attacking on too wide a front with no reserves and that they would most likely have 50 percent losses.[91]
The reply came from Freyberg that Montgomery
... was aware of the risk and has accepted the possibility of losing 100% casualties in 9th Armoured Brigade to make the break, but in view of the promise of immediate following through of the 1st Armoured Division, the risk was not considered as great as all that.
—  Freyberg[91]
The German and Italian anti-tank guns (mostly Pak38 and Italian 47 mm guns, along with 24 of the formidable 88 mm flak guns) opened fire upon the charging tanks silhouetted by the rising sun.[92][91] German tanks, which had penetrated between the Warwickshire Yeomanry and Royal Wiltshire Yeomanry, also caused many casualties. British tanks attacking the Folgore sector were fought off with petrol bombs and mortar fire as well as with the obsolete Italian 47 mm cannons. The Axis gun screen started to inflict a steady amount of damage upon the advancing tanks but was unable to stop them; over the course of the next 30 minutes, around 35 guns were destroyed and several hundred prisoners taken. The 9th Armoured Brigade had started the attack with 94 tanks and was reduced to only 14 operational tanks[93] and of the 400 tank crew involved in the attack, 230 were killed, wounded or captured.[94]
"If the British armour owed any debt to the infantry of the Eighth Army, the debt was paid on November 2 by 9th Armoured in heroism and blood."[95]
Bernard Montgomery, referring to the British Armour's mistakes during the First Battle of El Alamein[citation needed]
After the Brigade's action, Brigadier Gentry of 6th New Zealand Brigade went ahead to survey the scene. On seeing Brigadier Currie asleep on a stretcher, he approached him saying, "Sorry to wake you John, but I'd like to know where your tanks are?" Currie waved his hand at a group of tanks around him and replied "There they are". Gentry said "I don't mean your headquarters tanks, I mean your armoured regiments. Where are they?" Currie waved his arm and again replied, "There are my armoured regiments, Bill".[96]
The brigade had sacrificed itself upon the gun line and caused great damage but had failed to create the gap for the 1st Armoured Division to pass through; however, soon after dawn 1st Armoured Division started to deploy and the remains of 9th Armoured Brigade came under its command. 2nd Armoured Brigade came up behind the 9th, and by mid-morning 8th Armoured Brigade had come up on its left, ordered to advance to the south-west.[93] In heavy fighting during the day the British armour made little further progress. At 11:00 on 2 November, the remains of 15th Panzer, 21st Panzer and Littorio Armoured Divisions counter-attacked 1st Armoured Division and the remains of 9th Armoured Brigade, which by that time had dug in with a screen of anti-tank guns and artillery together with intensive air support. The counter-attack failed under a blanket of shells and bombs, resulting in a loss of some 100 tanks.[94]
German prisoners brought in from the battle
Although X Corps had failed in its attempt to break out, it had succeeded in its objective of finding and destroying enemy tanks. Although tank losses were approximately equal, this represented only a portion of the total British armour, but most of Rommel's tanks; the Afrika Korps strength of tanks fit for battle fell by 70 while in addition to the losses of the 9th Armoured Brigade, the 2nd and 8th Armoured Brigades lost 14 tanks in the fighting, with another 40 damaged or broken down. The fighting was later termed the "Hammering of the Panzers". In the late afternoon and early evening, the 133rd Lorried and 151st Infantry Brigades—by this time back under command of 51st Infantry Division—attacked respectively the Snipe and Skinflint (about a mile west of Snipe) positions in order to form a base for future operations. The heavy artillery concentration which accompanied their advance suppressed the opposition from the Trieste Division and the operation succeeded with few casualties.[97]
On the night of 2 November, Montgomery once again reshuffled his infantry in order to bring four brigades (5th Indian, 151st, 5th New Zealand and 154th) into reserve under XXX Corps to prepare for the next thrust. He also reinforced X Corps by moving 7th Armoured Division from army reserve and sending 4th Light Armoured Brigade from XIII Corps in the south. General von Thoma's report to Rommel that night said he would have at most 35 tanks available to fight the next day and his artillery and anti-tank weapons had been reduced to ⅓ of their strength at the start of the battle. Rommel concluded that to forestall a breakthrough and the resulting destruction of his whole army he must start withdrawing to the planned position at Fuka. He called up Ariete from the south to join the mobile Italian XX Corps around Tel el Aqqaqir. His mobile forces (XX Corps, Afrika Korps, 90th Light Division and 19th Flak Division) were ordered to make a fighting withdrawal while his other formations were to withdraw as best they could with the limited transport available.[98]
D + 11: 3 November[edit]
At 20:30 on 2 November, Lumsden decided that one more effort by his X Corps would see the gun screen on the Rahman track defeated and ordered 7th Motor Brigade to seize the track along a 2 mi (3.2 km) front north of Tell el Aqqaqir. The 2nd and 8th Armoured Brigades would then pass through the infantry to a distance of about 3.5 mi (5.6 km). On the morning of 3 November 7 Armoured Division would pass through and swing north heading for the railway at Ghazal station. 7th Motor Brigade set off at 01:15 on 3 November, but having received its orders late, had not had the chance to reconnoitre the battle area in daylight. This combined with stiff resistance led to the failure of their attack. As a consequence, the orders for the armour were changed and 2nd Armoured Brigade was tasked to support the forward battalion of 133rd Lorried Brigade (2nd King's Royal Rifle Corps) and 8th Armoured Brigade was to push south-west. Fighting continued throughout 3 November, but 2nd Armoured was held by elements of the Afrika Korps and tanks of the Littorio Division. Further south, 8th Armoured Brigade was held off by anti-tank units helped later by tanks of the arriving Ariete Division.[99]
Phase five: the break-out[edit]
Sherman tanks of the Eighth Army move across the desert
On 2 November, Rommel let Hitler know that: "The army's strength was so exhausted after its ten days of battle that it was not now capable of offering any effective opposition to the enemy's next break-through attempt ... With our great shortage of vehicles an orderly withdrawal of the non-motorised forces appeared impossible ... In these circumstances we had to reckon, at the least, with the gradual destruction of the army."[100] At 13.30 on 3 November Rommel received a reply:
"To Field Marshal Rommel. It is with trusting confidence in your leadership and the courage of the German-Italian troops under your command that the German people and I are following the heroic struggle in Egypt. In the situation which you find yourself there can be no other thought but to stand fast, yield not a yard of ground and throw every gun and every man into the battle. Considerable air force reinforcements are being sent to C.-in-C South. The Duce and the Comando Supremo are also making the utmost efforts to send you the means to continue the fight. Your enemy, despite his superiority, must also be at the end of his strength. It would not be the first time in history that a strong will has triumphed over the bigger battalions. As to your troops, you can show them no other road than that to victory or death. Adolf Hitler".[101]
Rommel thought the order (similar to one that had been given at the same time by Benito Mussolini through the Comando Supremo) "demanded the impossible. ... We were completely stunned, and for the first time in the African campaign I did not know what to do. A kind of apathy took hold of us as we issued orders for all existing positions to be held on instructions from the highest authority."[101]
Rommel decided to compromise: X and XXI Italian Corps and 90th Light Division would stand firm while the Afrika Korps would withdraw approximately 6 mi (9.7 km) west during the night of 3 November with XX Italian Corps and the Ariete Division conforming to their position. He then replied to Hitler confirming his determination to hold the battlefield. The Desert Air Force continued to apply huge pressure. In what was its biggest day of the battle, it flew 1,208 sorties and dropped 396 short tons (359 t) of bombs in the 24 hours of 3 November.[102]
On the night of 3 November, Montgomery launched at the Rahman track three of the infantry brigades he had gathered into reserve as a prelude to a massive armoured break out. At 17:45, 152nd Infantry Brigade—with 8th RTR in support—attacked about 2 mi (3.2 km) south of Tel el Aqqaqir. 5th Indian Infantry Brigade would attack the track 4 mi (6.4 km) south during the early hours of 4 November, and at 06:15, 154th Infantry Brigade would attack Tel el Aqqaqir. The first of these attacks—having been mistakenly told the enemy had withdrawn from their objectives—met stiff resistance. Failed communications compounded problems and the forward infantry elements ended up dug in well short of their objective. By the time 5th Indian Brigade set off, the defenders had started to withdraw and their objective was taken with virtually no opposition. By the time 154th Brigade moved forward, although they met some shelling, the enemy had left.[103]
D + 12, 4 November[edit]
A captured 88 mm Flak 36 near El Aqqaqir, November 1942
On 4 November, Eighth Army's plan for pursuit was set in motion at dawn. There were no fresh units available for the chase so 1st and 7th Armoured Division were to swing northward to roll up the Axis units still in the forward lines and 2nd New Zealand Division with two lorry borne infantry brigades and 9th Armoured and 4th Light Armoured Brigades under command would head west along desert tracks to the escarpment above Fuka, some 60 mi (97 km) away. The New Zealanders got off to a bad start because the units involved were dispersed after the recent fighting and took time to concentrate. The paths through the minefields were very congested and broken up, which delayed matters further. By dark, Freyberg had leaguered his force only 15 mi (24 km) west of the Rahman track, although 9th Armoured Brigade was still at the track and 6th New Zealand Brigade even further back.[104]
1st and 7th Armoured Divisions' plan to trap 90th Light Division also hit trouble. The 1st Armoured came into contact with the remnants of 21st Panzer and had to spend most of the day pushing them back 8 mi (13 km). Meanwhile, 7th Armoured was being held up by the Ariete Armoured Division which in the course of the day was decimated while giving stout resistance.[105] This action is described by Rommel in his diary:
Enormous dust-clouds could be seen south and south-east of headquarters [of the DAK], where the desperate struggle of the small and inefficient Italian tanks of XX Corps was being played out against the hundred or so British heavy tanks which had come round their open right flank. I was later told by Major von Luck, whose battalion I had sent to close the gap between the Italians and the Afrika Korps, that the Italians, who at that time represented our strongest motorised force, fought with exemplary courage. Tank after tank split asunder or burned out, while all the time a tremendous British barrage lay over the Italian infantry and artillery positions. The last signal came from the Ariete at about 15.30 hours: "Enemy tanks penetrated south of Ariete. Ariete now encircled. Location 5 km north-west Bir el Abd. Ariete tanks still in action." [...] In the Ariete we lost our oldest Italian comrades, from whom we had probably always demanded more than they, with their poor armament, had been capable of performing.[106][m]
This day also saw the destruction of the Littorio Armoured Division and the Trieste Motorised Division. Berlin radio claimed that in this sector the "British were made to pay for their penetration with enormous losses in men and material. The Italians fought to the last man."[108] The British, however, took many prisoners, since the remnants of Italian infantry divisions were not motorised and could not escape from encirclement. Private Sid Martindale, 1st Battalion Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders, wrote about the "Bologna" Division, which had taken the full weight of the British armoured attack:[n]
The more we advanced the more we realized that the Italians did not have much fight in them after putting up a strong resistance to our overwhelming advance and they started surrendering to our lead troops in droves. There was not much action to see but we came across lots of burnt out Italian tanks that had been destroyed by our tanks. I had never seen a battlefield before and the site [sic] of so many dead was sickening.[110]
Bologna and the remainder of Trento Division tried to fight their way out of Alamein and marched in the desert without water, food, or transport before surrendering exhausted and dying from dehydration.[111] It was reported that Colonel Arrigo Dall'Olio, commanding the 40th Infantry Regiment of the Bologna,[112] surrendered saying, "We have ceased firing not because we haven't the desire but because we have spent every round."[citation needed] In a symbolic act of final defiance, no one in 40th Bologna Infantry Regiment raised their hands. Harry Zinder of Time magazine noted that the Italians fought better than had been expected, and commented that for the Italians
It was a terrific letdown by their German allies. They had fought a good fight. In the south, the famed Folgore parachute division fought to the last round of ammunition. Two armoured divisions and a motorised division, which had been interspersed among the German formations, thought they would be allowed to retire gracefully with Rommel's 21st, 15th and 19th [sic][o] light. But even that was denied them. When it became obvious to Rommel that there would be little chance to hold anything between El Daba and the frontier, his Panzers dissolved, disintegrated and turned tail, leaving the Italians to fight a rear-guard action.[113]
By late morning on 4 November, Rommel realised his situation was dire: "The picture in the early afternoon of the 4th was as follows: powerful enemy armoured forces ... had burst a 19-kilometre hole in our front, through which strong bodies of tanks were moving to the west. As a result of this, our forces in the north were threatened with encirclement by enemy formations 20 times their number in tanks ... There were no reserves, as every available man and gun had been put into the line. So now it had come, the thing we had done everything in our power to avoid – our front broken and the fully motorised enemy streaming into our rear. Superior orders could no longer count. We had to save what there was to be saved."[106]
Rommel telegraphed Hitler for permission to fall back on Fuka. As further Allied blows fell, von Thoma was captured and reports came in from the Ariete and Trento that they were encircled. At 17:30, unable to wait any longer for a reply from Hitler, Rommel gave orders to retreat.[105]
Due to insufficient transportation, most of the Italian infantry formations were abandoned and left to their fate.[114][115] Any chance of getting them away with an earlier move had been spoiled by the dictator's insistence that Rommel hold his ground, obliging him to keep the un-motorised Italian units well forward until it was too late.[116] To deepen the armoured thrusts, 1st Armoured Division was directed at El Daba, some 15 mi (24 km) down the coast and 7th Armoured towards Galal, a further 24 km (15 mi) west along the railway. Meanwhile, the New Zealand group had hoped to reach their objective by mid-morning on 5 November, but was held up by shell fire when picking their way through what turned out to be a dummy minefield and 15th Panzer were able to get there first.[117]
D + 13, 5 November[edit]
Churchill tanks of 'Kingforce' of the 1st Armoured Division during the battle, 5 November 1942
Montgomery now realised that in order to finish the enemy off he would need to make even deeper armoured thrusts. 7th Armoured was ordered across country to intercept the coastal road at Sidi Haneish, 65 mi (105 km) west of the Rahman track while 1st Armoured, at that time west of El Dada, was ordered to take a wide detour through the desert to Bir Khalda, 80 mi (130 km) west of the Rahman track preparatory to swinging up to cut the road at Mersa Matruh. Neither move proved successful. 7th Armoured finished the day 20 mi (32 km) short of its objective. 1st Armoured determined to make up time with a night march, but in the darkness the armour became separated from their support vehicles and as a consequence ran out of fuel at dawn on 6 November, 16 mi (26 km) short of Bir Khalda. The Air Force continued to fly in support but because of the wide spread of the various X Corps units it was difficult to establish firm "bomb lines" demarcating areas in which troops and vehicles could be assumed to be those of the enemy and so free to be attacked.[118]
D + 14, 6 November[edit]
By 11:00 on 6 November, the "B" Echelon vehicles were starting to reconnect with 1st Armoured Division, but only enough partly to refuel two of the armoured regiments which set off again hoping to be in time to cut off the enemy. However, they ran out of fuel again, 30 mi (48 km) south-west of Mersa Matruh. A fuel convoy had set out from Alamein on the evening of 5 November, but progress was slow as the tracks had become very cut up. By midday on the 6th, rain had started to fall and the convoy became bogged down, still 40 mi (64 km) from the planned meeting point with the 1st Armoured Division "B" echelon support vehicles.[119]
On the morning of 6 November 2 New Zealand Division advanced toward Sidi Haneish while 10th Armoured Division's 8th Armoured Brigade had moved west from Galal to occupy the landing fields at Fuka and the escarpment. Roughly 15 mi (24 km) south-west of Sidi Haneish, 7th Armoured Division had come upon 21st Panzer and the Voss Reconnaissance Group that morning. There was a series of clashes during the day during which 21st Panzer lost 16 tanks and numerous guns. They narrowly escaped encirclement, however, and escaped on wheels that evening to Mersa Matruh. Once again, it proved difficult to firmly identify targets for the air force but during the day US heavy bombers attacked Tobruk, sinking Etiopia (2,153 long tons (2,188 t)) and later attacked Benghazi, sinking the Mars and setting the tanker Portofino (6,572 GRT), alight.[120]
D + 15–18, 7–11 November[edit]
A German 88mm gun abandoned near the coast road, west of El Alamein, 7 November 1942
On 7 November, poor ground conditions after the rain and lack of fuel saw 1st and 7th Armoured Divisions remaining quiet. 10th Armoured Division, with the benefit of working on the coastal road and with ample fuel, pushed its tanks on to Mersa Matruh while its infantry mopped up on the road west of Galal.[121]
Rommel intended to fight a delaying action at Sidi Barrani, 80 mi (130 km) west of Matruh, to give his retreating forces time to get through the bottleneck through the escarpment passes at Halfya and Sollum.[122] The last rearguards left Matruh on the night of 7/8 November but were only able to hold Sidi Barrani until the evening of the 9th. By the evening of 10 November the New Zealand Division, heading for Sollum, had 4th Light Armoured Brigade at the foot of the Halfya Pass while 7th Armoured Division was conducting another detour to the south aiming to swing round and take Fort Capuzzo and Sidi Azeiz. On the morning of 11 November, 5th New Zealand Infantry Brigade stormed the pass taking 600 Italian prisoners.
By the end of the day on the 11th, the Egyptian border area was clear, but Montgomery was forced to order that the pursuit should—for the time being—be continued by armoured cars and artillery only because of the difficulty in supplying larger formations west of Bardia until the supply infrastructure could catch up.[123]
Aftermath[edit]
Analysis[edit]
[show]Diagrammatic narrative of the battle
Allied Forces attack: 10pm 23 October
Axis Armoured Divisions counter-attack: 6pm 24 October
Allies attempt to break through: Night of 25 October
Axis counter-attack and attack by 9th Australian Division: Afternoon of 25 October
Folgore Parachutist Division attacked from three directions: 10:30 pm 25 October until 3 am 26 October
Allies advance- 51st Highland Division takes Kidney Ridge, Littorio Armoured Division counter-attacks: 5pm 26 October
Both sides redeploy their Forces: Night of 26 to 27 October
Axis fails to retake Kidney Ridge: 8am 27 October
Allies attempt to push back Trento Division: 28 October
Rommel redeploys his forces: 29 October
Operation Supercharge begins, 9th Australian fails to break through: 11pm 31 October 1942.
Tank Battle of Tell el Aqqaqir: 9am 2 November; Axis forces begin retreat: 10pm 2 November
Axis forces prepare to fall back: 3 November
Axis forces halt their retreat: 3 November
Allied forces break through: 7am 4 November; Trento, Bologna and Ariete Divisions destroyed, Axis forces flee
El Alamein was an Allied victory, although Rommel did not lose hope until the end of the Tunisia Campaign. Churchill said,
It may almost be said, "Before Alamein we never had a victory. After Alamein we never had a defeat".
—  Winston Churchill.[124]
The Allies frequently had numerical superiority in the Western Desert but never had it been so complete in quantity and quality. With the arrival of Sherman tanks, 6-pounder anti-tank guns and Spitfires in the Western Desert, the Allies gained a comprehensive superiority.[125] Montgomery envisioned the battle as an attrition operation, similar to those fought in World War I and correctly predicted the length of the battle and the number of Allied casualties. Allied artillery was superbly handled and Allied air support was excellent, in contrast to the Luftwaffe and Regia Aeronautica, which offered little or no support to ground forces, preferring to engage in air-to-air combat. Air supremacy had a huge effect on the battle and not only because of its physical impact. As Montgomery later wrote,
The moral effect of air action [on the enemy] is very great and out of all proportion to the material damage inflicted. In the reverse direction, the sight and sound of our own air forces operating against the enemy have an equally satisfactory effect on our own troops. A combination of the two has a profound influence on the most important single factor in war—morale.
—  Montgomery[82]
Casualties[edit]
Memorial to the 9th Australian Division at the El Alamein Cemetery
In 2005, Barr wrote that the 36,939 men Panzerarmee casualties, was an estimate because of the chaos of the Axis retreat. British figures, based on Ultra intercepts, gave German casualties as 1,149 killed, 3,886 wounded and 8,050 men captured. Italian losses were 971 dead, 933 wounded and 15,552 men captured. By 11 November, the number of Axis prisoners had risen to 30,000 men.[12] In a note to The Rommel Papers, Fritz Bayerlein (quoting figures obtained from Offizieller Bericht des Oberkommandos Afrika) instead estimated German losses in the battle as 1,100 killed, 3,900 wounded and 7,900 prisoners and Italian losses as 1,200 killed, 1,600 wounded and 20,000 prisoners.[126]
According to the official history of the Italian Army, Axis losses during the battle were 4,000 to 5,000 killed or missing, 7,000 to 8,000 wounded and 17,000 prisoners; during the retreat the losses rose to 9,000 killed or missing, 15,000 wounded and 35,000 prisoners.[127] According to the writings of General Giuseppe Rizzo, total Axis casualties included 25,000 men killed or wounded (including 5,920 Italians killed) and 30,000 prisoners (20,000 Italians and 10,724 Germans), as well as 510 tanks and 2,000 field guns, anti-tank guns, anti-aircraft guns.[128] Axis tank losses were c. 500; on 4 November, only 36 German tanks were left out of the 249 at the beginning of the battle. About half of the 278 Italian tanks had been lost and most of the remainder were knocked out on the next day by the 7th Armoured Division. About 254 Axis guns were lost, along with 64 German and 20 Italian aircraft.[12][129]
The Eighth Army had 13,560 casualties, of whom 2,350 men had been killed, 8,950 wounded and 2,260 men were missing; 58 percent of the casualties were British, 22 percent Australian, 10 percent New Zealanders, 6 percent South African, 1 percent Indian and 3 percent were Allied forces. The Eighth Army lost from 332–500 tanks, although by the end of the battle, 300 had already been repaired. The artillery lost 111 guns and the DAF lost 77 British and 20 American aircraft.[13]
Subsequent operations[edit]
The Eighth Army was surprised by Rommel's withdrawal and confusion caused by redeployments between the three corps meant they were slow in pursuit, failing to cut off Rommel at Fuka and Mersa Matruh.[130] The Desert Air Force failed to make a maximum effort to bomb a disorganised and retreating opponent, which on 5 November was within range and confined to the coast road. Supply shortages and a belief that the Luftwaffe were about to get strong reinforcements, led the DAF to be cautious, reduce the number of offensive sorties on 5 November and protect the Eighth Army.[131]
Battle of El Agheila[edit]
Main article: Battle of El Agheila
Area of Western Desert Campaign 1941–1942
The Axis made a fighting withdrawal to El Agheila but Rommel's troops found themselves exhausted and with few replacements, while Montgomery had planned to transport material over great distances, to provide the Eighth Army with 2,400 t (2,600 short tons) of supplies per day. Huge quantities of engineer stores had been collected to repair transport infrastructure and the railway line from El Alamein to Fort Capuzzo, despite having been blown up in over 200 places, was quickly repaired. In the month after Eighth Army reached Capuzzo, the railway carried 133,000 short tons (121,000 t) of supplies. Benghazi handled 3,000 short tons (2,700 t) a day by the end of December, rather than the expected 800 short tons (730 t).[132]
Mindful of Axis counter-strokes from El Agheila, Montgomery paused for three weeks to concentrate his forces and prepare an assault. On 11 December, Montgomery launched the 51st (Highland) Division along the line of the coast road with 7th Armoured Division on the inland flank. On 12 December the 2nd New Zealand Division started a deeper flanking manouevre to cut the Axis line of retreat on coast road in the rear of the Mersa Brega position.[133] The Highland Division made a slow and costly advance and 7th Armoured met stiff resistance from the Ariete Combat Group (the remains of the Ariete Armoured Division). Rommel's army had lost roughly 75,000 men, 1,000 guns and 500 tanks since the Second battle of Alamein and withdrew.[134] By 15 December, the New Zealanders had reached the coast road but the firm terrain allowed Rommel to break his forces into smaller units and withdraw off-road, through the gaps between the New Zealanders positions.[135]
Rommel conducted a text-book retreat, destroying all equipment and infrastructure left behind and peppering the land behind him with mines and booby traps.[136] Eighth Army reached Sirte on 25 December but west of Sirte, were forced to pause to consolidate their strung out formations, to prepare an attack at Wadi Zemzem near Buerat 230 mi (370 km) east of Tripoli.[137] Rommel had, with the agreement of Field Marshal Bastico, sent a request to the Italian Comando Supremo in Rome to withdraw to Tunisia where the terrain would better suit a defensive action and where he could link with the Axis army forming there, in response to the Operation Torch landings. Mussolini replied on 19 December that the Panzer Army must resist to the last man at Buerat.[135]
Tripoli[edit]
On 15 January 1943, General Montgomery launched the 51st (Highland) Division in a frontal attack while sending the 2nd New Zealand Division and the 7th Armoured Division around the inland flank of the Axis line. Weakened by the withdrawal of 21st Panzer Division to Tunisia to strengthen von Arnim's Fifth Panzer Army (5. Panzerarmee), Rommel conducted a fighting retreat.[138] The port of Tripoli, some 150 mi (240 km) further west, was taken on 23 January as Rommel continued to withdraw to the French-built southern defences of Tunisia, the Mareth Line.
Tunisia[edit]
Main article: Tunisia Campaign
Rommel was by this time in contact with von Arnim's Fifth Panzer Army, which had been fighting against the multi-national British First Army in northern Tunisia, since shortly after Operation Torch the previous autumn. Hitler was determined to retain hold of Tunisia and Rommel finally started to receive replacement men and materials. The Axis now faced a war in Africa on two fronts with Eighth Army approaching from the east and the British, French and Americans from the west. Rommel's German-Italian Panzer Army was renamed the Italian First Army under General Giovanni Messe and Rommel assumed command of the new Army Group Africa, responsible for both fronts.[citation needed] The two Allied armies were placed under 18th Army Group with Harold Alexander in command. The failure of British First Army forces in the run for Tunis in December 1942 led to a prolongation of the North African campaign which would not end until the Italian-German forces in North Africa capitulated in May 1943.
See also[edit]
World War II portal
El Alamein Fountain (war memorial commemorating the battle, in Sydney, Australia)
List of World War II Battles
North African Campaign timeline
Dan Pienaar
Notes[edit]
Jump up ^ In Playfair the estimate for this figure is 104,000 comprising 54,000 Italians and 50,000 Germans including the 19th Flak Division and the Ramcke Parachute Brigade, both Luftwaffe units. There were approximately 77,000 Italians in North Africa who did not come under the Panzerarmee.[4]
Jump up ^ 249 German tanks and 298 Italian tanks: 31 Panzer II, 85 Panzer III (short 50mm main gun), 88 Panzer III (long 50mm main gun), 8 Panzer IV (short 75mm main gun), 30 Panzer IV (long 75mm main gun), 7 command tanks, 278 Fiat M13/40 variants and 20 Italian light tanks; another 23 German tanks under repair, have been excluded.[5]
Jump up ^ 275 German (150 serviceable) including 80 dive bombers) and 400 Italian (200 serviceable) aircraft. There was a further 225 (130 serviceable) German bombers in Italy and Greece. There were 300 German and Italian transport aircraft not included in the total.[7]
Jump up ^ 68 7.65 cm (Source possibly means the 7.62 cm PaK 36(r)) anti-tank guns, 290 50mm Pak 38 anti-tank guns, 88mm flak guns.[9]
Jump up ^ 1,029 tanks were operational at the start of the battle: 170 M3 Grant and 252 M4 Sherman medium tanks, 216 Crusader II and 78 Crusader III Cruiser tanks, 119 M3 Stuart (Honey) light tanks and 194 Valentine Infantry tanks. There were 200 replacement tanks and over 1,000 tanks were in various stages of repair, overhaul or being modified at workshops.[11]
Jump up ^ There was a front line strength of 420 fighters, of which only 50 were Supermarine Spitfire and nearly half were Hawker Hurricanes.[6]
Jump up ^ This figure excludes 54 transport aircraft.[7]
Jump up ^ 554 were 2 pounder anti-tank guns and 849 6 pounders.[9]
Jump up ^ 13,085 German casualties, including 1,149 killed, 3,886 wounded and 8,050 men captured. 17,456 Italian losses, including 971 dead, 933 wounded and 15,552 men captured.[12]
Jump up ^ including 4,810 killed or missing and 8,950 wounded.[13]
Jump up ^ The Polish Mine Detector designed in Scotland in 1941 by the Polish engineer and signals officer, Lieutnant Józef Kosacki was to be used for the first time in action. Five hundred of these were issued to Eighth Army. The apparatus doubled the speed at which heavily mined sands could be cleared, from around 100 metres (110 yd) to about 200 m (220 yd) an hour.[23]
Jump up ^ Sometimes shown on Axis maps as "28"[49]
Jump up ^ The Ariete, however, was not completely destroyed and fought in the following battle of El Agheila.[107]
Jump up ^ This is not accurate. The Bologna was returning on foot to the front line after the retreat order by Rommel had been cancelled. When the attack by 2nd New Zealand Division achieved a breakthrough in the sector defended by the Trento Division, armoured cars and tanks were sent forward in the open desert and caught the exhausted and disorganised soldiers of the Bologna off guard.[109]
Jump up ^ Presumably a confused reference to the 90th Light Division. There was no 19th Light Division in the German Order of Battle
Footnotes[edit]
Jump up ^ Maurer 1983, p. 120.
Jump up ^ Latimer 2003, pp. 249–250.
Jump up ^ Buffetaut 1995, p. 95.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Playfair 2004, p. 30.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 9–11.
^ Jump up to: a b Barr 2005, p. 304.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 3.
^ Jump up to: a b Barr 2005, p. 26.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 10.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 276.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 9.
^ Jump up to: a b c Barr 2005, p. 404.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, pp. 404, 78.
Jump up ^ Terraine 1985, p. 385.
^ Jump up to: a b Bierman & Smith 2003, p. 255.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, p. 425.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, p. 423.
^ Jump up to: a b c Hinsley 1981, p. 427.
Jump up ^ Greene & Massignani 1994, p. 219.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Playfair 2004, p. 34.
^ Jump up to: a b Dear 2005, p. 254.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, pp. 430–431.
Jump up ^ Modelski 1986, p. 221.
Jump up ^ Lucas 1983, p. 123.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 269.
Jump up ^ Afrika Korps War Diary, 30 September 1942
Jump up ^ Creveld 1997, p. 196.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 26.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, pp. 432–433.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 27–28.
Jump up ^ Jentz 1996, p. 8.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 28–29.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 20.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, p. 431.
Jump up ^ Latimer 2002, p. 177.
Jump up ^ Mead 2007, p. 304.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 308.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, p. 307.
^ Jump up to: a b Hinsley 1981, p. 438.
Jump up ^ Bierman & Smith 2002, chapters 22–24.
Jump up ^ Bauer 2000, pp. 366–368.
Jump up ^ Bauer 2000, p. 368.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 42.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 44.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 50.
Jump up ^ Young 1966, p. 260.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 46.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 47.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 48.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, p. 308.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 49.
Jump up ^ Greene & Massignani 1994, p. 177.
Jump up ^ Montanari 1993, pp. 753–754.
^ Jump up to: a b Young 1966, p. 261.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 23.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 50–51.
Jump up ^ Strawson 1981, p. 119.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 360.
^ Jump up to: a b Hinsley 1981, p. 439.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 51.
Jump up ^ Vivian 2000, p. 278.
Jump up ^ Untold stories from the Desert Air Force – Eighth Army's enforcer in the Second World War
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 52.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 53–54.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 54.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 54–55.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 56.
Jump up ^ Lucas-Phillips 1962, p. 296.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 56–57.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 56, 54.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 57.
^ Jump up to: a b Hinsley 1981, p. 441.
Jump up ^ Walker 2006, p. 166.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 58.
Jump up ^ Johnston, Dr. Mark (23 October 2002). "The Battle of El Alamein, 23 October 1942". Remembering 1942. Australian War Memorial, Canberra. Retrieved 15 April 2008.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 58, 63.
Jump up ^ Vivian 2000, p. 279.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 59.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 61.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 61–62.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 380.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 63.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 26.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, Map 10.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 64–65.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 64– 65.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, p. 445.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 66.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, p. 387.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 66–67.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Barr 2005, p. 386.
Jump up ^ Walker 1967, p. 395.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 67.
^ Jump up to: a b Watson 2007, p. 24.
Jump up ^ Barr 2005, pp. 388–389.
Jump up ^ Lucas-Phillips 1962, p. 358.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 67–70.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 68–69.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 70–71.
Jump up ^ Rommel 1982, p. 319.
^ Jump up to: a b Rommel 1982, p. 321.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 73–74.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 75.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 81, 83.
^ Jump up to: a b Playfair 2004, p. 84.
^ Jump up to: a b Rommel 1982, p. 325.
Jump up ^ Montanari 1993, p. 815.
Jump up ^ "Desert War, Note (11): Statement issued by the German Government on 6 November 1942". spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk. Archived from the original on 30 April 2009. Retrieved 22 December 2007.
Jump up ^ Montanari 1993, p. 812.
Jump up ^ Spirit, Martin; Martindale, Sid (2005). "Sid's War: The Story of an Argyll at War". Archived from the original on 22 June 2011. Retrieved 27 January 2008.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 27.
Jump up ^ Caccia Dominioni de Sillavengo, Paolo (1966). Alamein 1933–1962: An Italian Story. Translated by Chamberlin, Dennis. Allen & Unwin. p. 130. OCLC 557831458.
Jump up ^ Zinder, Harry (16 November 1942). "A Pint of Water per Man". Time Magazine (16 November 1942). Archived from the original on 26 September 2010. Retrieved 23 May 2010.
Jump up ^ Bierman & Smith 2003, chapter 27.
Jump up ^ Bauer 2000, p. 372.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 73.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 86–87.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 87–88.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 89–90.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 90.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 91.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 93.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 94–95.
Jump up ^ Churchill 1950, p. 603.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, p. 76.
Jump up ^ The Rommel Papers
Jump up ^ Montanari 1993, p. 838.
Jump up ^ Giuseppe Rizzo, Buche e croci nel deserto, Verona, 1969, p. 549.
Jump up ^ Playfair 2004, pp. 78–79.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 30.
Jump up ^ Hinsley 1981, pp. 452–453.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, pp. 317–318.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, pp. 39, 42.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, p. 319.
^ Jump up to: a b Watson 2007, p. 43.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, pp. 322, 320.
Jump up ^ Clifford 1943, pp. 325–327.
Jump up ^ Watson 2007, p. 44.
References[edit]
Barr, Niall (2005) [2004]. Pendulum of War: The Three Battles of El Alamein. Woodstock, NY: Overlook Press. ISBN 978-1-58567-738-2.
Bauer, Eddy (2000) [1979]. Young, Peter, ed. The History of World War II (rev. ed.). London: Orbis. ISBN 1-85605-552-3.
Bierman, John; Smith, Colin (2003) [2002]. War Without Hate: The Desert Campaign of 1940–1943. New York: Penguin Books. ISBN 978-0-14-200394-7.
Buffetaut, Yves (1995). Operation Supercharge-La seconde bataille d'El Alamein [Operation Supercharge: Second Battle of El Alamein]. Les grandes batailles de la Seconde Guerre mondiale: Collection hors-série Militaria (in French). Paris: Histoire Et Collections. OCLC 464158829.
Churchill, W. (1950). The Hinge of Fate. The Second World War. new York: Bantam. OCLC 24115733.
Clifford, Alexander (1943). Three Against Rommel. London: George G. Harrap. OCLC 10426023.
Creveld, Martin van (1997). Supplying War; Logistics from Wallenstein to Patton. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-54657-5.
Dear, I. C. B., ed. (2005) [1995]. The Oxford Companion to World War II. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-280666-6.
Greene, Jack; Massignani, Alessandro (1994). Rommel's North Africa Campaign: September 1940 – November 1942. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo. ISBN 978-1-58097-018-1.
Hinsley, F. H.; Thomas, E. E.; Ransom, C. F. G.; Knight, R. C. (1981). British Intelligence in the Second World War: Its influence on Strategy and Operations. II. London: HMSO. ISBN 0-11-630934-2.
Jentz, Thomas L. (1996). Panzertruppen 2: The Complete Guide to the Creation & Combat Employment of Germany's Tank Force 1943–1945. Schiffer. ISBN 0-7643-0080-6.
Latimer, Jon (2002). Alamein. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0-7195-6203-7.
Latimer, Jon (2003) [2002]. Alamein. London: John Murray. ISBN 978-0-7195-6213-6.
Lucas-Phillips, C. E. (1962). Alamein. London: Heinemann. OCLC 3510044.
Lucas, James Sydney (1983). War in the Desert: The Eighth Army at El Alamein. New York: Beaufort Books. OCLC 610276818.
Maurer, Maurer (1983) [1961]. Air Force Combat Units Of World War II (PDF). Maxwell AFB, Alabama: Office of Air Force History. ISBN 0-89201-092-4.
Mead, Richard (2007). Churchill's Lions: A Biographical Guide to the Key British Generals of World War II. Stroud: Spellmount. ISBN 978-1-86227-431-0.
Modelski, Tadeusz (1986). The Polish Contribution to The Ultimate Allied Victory in The Second World War. Worthing. OCLC 60083169.
Montanari, Mario (1993). El Alamein. Le operazioni in Africa Settentrionale. III. Roma: Stato Maggiore dell'esercito, Ufficio Storico. OCLC 313319483.
Playfair, Major-General I. S. O.; et al. (2004) [1st. pub. HMSO 1966]. Butler, J. R. M., ed. The Mediterranean and Middle East: The Destruction of the Axis Forces in Africa. History of the Second World War United Kingdom Military Series. IV (Naval & Military Press ed.). London: HMSO. ISBN 1-84574-068-8.
Rommel, Erwin; Liddell Hart, Basil (1982) [1953]. The Rommel Papers. New York: Da Capo Press. ISBN 978-0-306-80157-0.
Strawson, John (1981). El Alamein: Desert Victory. London: J. M. Dent. OCLC 0460044222.
Terraine, John (1985). The Right of the Line: The Royal Air Force in the European War, 1939–45. London: Hodder & Stoughton. ISBN 9780340266441.
Vivian, Cassandra (2000). The Western Desert of Egypt: An Explorer's Handbook. Cairo: American University in Cairo Press. ISBN 977-424-527-X.
Walker, Ian W. (2006). Iron Hulls, Iron Hearts; Mussolini's Elite Armoured Divisions in North Africa. Ramsbury: The Crowood Press. ISBN 1-86126-646-4.
Walker, Ronald (1967). Alam Halfa and Alamein. The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945. Wellington, NZ: Historical Publications Branch. OCLC 893102.
Watson, Bruce Allen (2007) [1999]. Exit Rommel: The Tunisian Campaign, 1942–43. Mechanicsburg, PA: Stackpole. ISBN 0-8117-3381-5.
Young, Peter (1966). A Short History of World War II 1939–1945 (1970 ed.). London: Pan Books. OCLC 852185369.
Further reading[edit]
Bright, John, ed. (1951). The Ninth Queen's Royal Lancers 1936–1945: The Story of an Armoured Regiment in Battle. Aldershot: Gale & Polden. OCLC 3732838.
Carell, Paul (1962). The Foxes of the Desert. New York: Bantam Books. OCLC 721200796.
Carver, Field Marshal Lord (2000) [1962]. El Alamein (pbk. ed.). Ware: Wordsworth Editions. ISBN 978-1-84022-220-3.
Maughan, Barton (1966). "14 Launching the Battle and 15 The Dog Fight". Tobruk and El Alamein. Official History of Australia in the Second World War Series 1 (Army). III (online ed.). Canberra: Australian War Memorial. pp. 639–754. OCLC 954993. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
Walker, Ronald (1967). Alam Halfa and Alamein. The Official History of New Zealand in the Second World War 1939–1945 (online ed.). Wellington, NZ: Historical Publications Branch. OCLC 504337535. Retrieved 23 February 2018.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Second Battle of El Alamein.
External image
The Second Battle of El Alamein
Battle of El Alamein: map of initial dispositions
The fate of the Italians in the battle as reported by TIME MAGAZINE
The war time memories of Pte. Sid Martindale 1st Battalion Argyll & Sutherland Highlanders
The 3rd Hussars (9th Armoured Brigade) at El Alamein
Royal Engineers Museum Royal Engineers and Second World War (Deception and mine clearance at El Alamein)
German Minefields at Alamein (October – November, 1942) US War Department Information Bulletin, 1943
The History of the British 7th Armoured Division at the Wayback Machine (archived 21 June 2007)
El Alamein at the Wayback Machine (archived 22 March 2008)
El Alamein in Egypt Today (where to stay etc)
[show]
v
t
e
World War II
Asia and the Pacific
China
South-East Asia
North and Central Pacific
South-West Pacific
Europe
Western
Eastern
Mediterranean and Middle East
North Africa
East Africa
Italy
West Africa
Atlantic
North America
South America
Casualties
Military engagements
Conferences
Commanders
Participants
Allies
(leaders)
Australia
Belgium
Brazil
Canada
China
Cuba
Czechoslovakia
Denmark
Ethiopia
France
Free France (from June 1940)
Greece
India
Italy (from September 1943)
Luxembourg
Mexico
Netherlands
New Zealand
Norway
Philippines (Commonwealth)
Poland
South Africa
Southern Rhodesia
Soviet Union
United Kingdom
United States
Puerto Rico
Yugoslavia
Axis and
Axis-aligned
(leaders)
Albania
Bulgaria
Reorganized National Government of the Republic of China
Independent State of Croatia
Finland
Germany
Hungary
Free India
Iraq
Italy (until September 1943)
Italian Social Republic
Japan
Manchukuo
Philippines (Second Republic)
Romania
Slovakia
Thailand
Vichy France
Armed neutrality
Resistance
Albania
Austria
Belgium
Bulgaria
Czech lands
Denmark
Estonia
Ethiopia
France
Germany
Greece
Hong Kong
Italy
Japan
Jewish
Korea
Latvia
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Malaya
Netherlands
Northeast China
Norway
Philippines
Poland
Anti-communist
Romania
Thailand
Soviet Union
Slovakia
Western Ukraine
Vietnam
Yugoslavia
Monarchists
Timeline
Prelude
Africa
Asia
Europe
1939
Poland
Phoney War
Winter War
Atlantic
Changsha
China
1940
Weserübung
Netherlands
Belgium
France
Armistice of 22 June 1940
Britain
North Africa
West Africa
British Somaliland
North China
Baltic States
Moldova
Indochina
Greece
Compass
1941
East Africa
Yugoslavia
Shanggao
Greece
Crete
Iraq
Soviet Union (Barbarossa)
Finland
Lithuania
Syria and Lebanon
Kiev
Iran
Leningrad
Gorky
Moscow
Sevastopol
Pearl Harbor
The outbreak of the Pacific War
Hong Kong
Philippines
Changsha
Malaya
Borneo (1941–42)
1942
Burma
Changsha
Java Sea
Coral Sea
Gazala
Dutch Harbor
Attu (occupation)
Kiska
Zhejiang-Jiangxi
Midway
Rzhev
Blue
Stalingrad
Singapore
Dieppe
El Alamein
Guadalcanal
Torch
1943
Tunisia
Kursk
Smolensk
Gorky
Solomon Islands
Attu
Sicily
Cottage
Lower Dnieper
Italy
Armistice of Cassibile
Gilbert and Marshall Islands
Burma
Northern Burma and Western Yunnan
Changde
1944
Monte Cassino / Shingle
Narva
Korsun–Cherkassy
Tempest
Ichi-Go
Overlord
Neptune
Normandy
Mariana and Palau
Bagration
Western Ukraine
Tannenberg Line
Warsaw
Eastern Romania
Belgrade
Paris
Dragoon
Gothic Line
Market Garden
Estonia
Crossbow
Pointblank
Lapland
Hungary
Leyte
Ardennes
Bodenplatte
Philippines (1944–1945)
Burma (1944–45)
1945
Vistula–Oder
Iwo Jima
Western invasion of Germany
Okinawa
Italy (Spring 1945)
Borneo
Syrmian Front
Berlin
Czechoslovakia
Budapest
West Hunan
Guangxi
Surrender of Germany
Project Hula
Manchuria
Manila
Borneo
Taipei
Atomic bombings
Debate
Kuril Islands
Shumshu
Surrender of Japan
End of World War II in Asia
Aspects
General
Famines
Bengal famine of 1943
Chinese famine of 1942–43
Greek Famine of 1941-1944
Dutch famine of 1944–45
Vietnamese Famine of 1945
Air warfare of World War II
Blitzkrieg
Comparative military ranks
Cryptography
Diplomacy
Home front
United States
Australian
United Kingdom
Lend-Lease
Manhattan Project
Military awards
Military equipment
Military production
Nazi plunder
Opposition
Technology
Allied cooperation
Total war
Strategic bombing
Puppet states
Women
Art and World War II
Aftermath
Expulsion of Germans
Operation Paperclip
Operation Osoaviakhim
Operation Keelhaul
Occupation of Germany
Territorial changes of Germany
Soviet occupations
Romania
Poland
Hungary
Baltic States
Occupation of Japan
First Indochina War
Indonesian National Revolution
Cold War
Decolonization
Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany
Popular culture
War crimes
Allied war crimes
Soviet war crimes
British war crimes
United States war crimes
German (Forced labour) / Wehrmacht war crimes
Holocaust
Aftermath
Response
Prosecution
Italian war crimes
Japanese war crimes
Unit 731
Prosecution
Croatian war crimes
against the Serbs
against the Jews
Romanian war crimes
Wartime
sexual violence
German military brothels
Camp brothels
Rape during the occupation of Japan
Sook Ching
Comfort women
Rape of Nanking
Rape of Manila
Rape during the occupation of Germany
Rape during the liberation of France
Rape during the liberation of Poland
Prisoners
Finnish prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
German prisoners of war in the United States
Italian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Japanese prisoners of war in World War II
German mistreatment of Soviet prisoners of war
Polish prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Romanian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union
Soviet prisoners of war in Finland
Bibliography
Category
Portal
[show]
v
t
e
Major tank battles
WWI
Battle of Cambrai (1917)
WWII
Battle of Brody (1941)
Battle of Stalingrad
Second Battle of El Alamein
Battle of Prokhorovka
Battle of Kursk
Battle of Arracourt
Battle of the Bulge
Indo-Pakistani War of 1965
Battle of Asal Uttar
Battle of Chawinda
Indo-Pakistani War of 1971
Battle of Basantar
Yom Kippur War
Battle of Valley of Tears
Gulf War
Battle of 73 Easting
Coordinates: 30°50′N 28°57′E / 30.833°N 28.950°E / 30.833; 28.950
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Second_Battle_of_El_Alamein&oldid=838316749"
Categories:
Conflicts in 1942
1942 in Egypt
Battles and operations of World War II involving Greece
Battles and operations of World War II involving India
Battles and operations of World War II involving South Africa
Battles of World War II involving Australia
Battles of World War II involving France
Battles of World War II involving Germany
Battles of World War II involving Italy
Battles of World War II involving the United Kingdom
Egypt in World War II
Egypt–United Kingdom military relations
El Alamein
Erwin Rommel
Tank battles involving Germany
Tank battles involving Italy
Tank battles involving the United Kingdom
Tank battles involving South Africa
Tank battles of World War II
Western Desert Campaign
October 1942 events
November 1942 events
Hidden categories:
EngvarB from November 2017
Use dmy dates from July 2012
Articles needing additional references from November 2016
All articles needing additional references
All articles with unsourced statements
Articles with unsourced statements from March 2009
Wikipedia articles needing clarification from June 2014
Articles with unsourced statements from August 2013
Pages incorrectly using the quote template
Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008
Articles with unsourced statements from April 2008
Articles with unsourced statements from January 2014
CS1 French-language sources (fr)
Webarchive template wayback links
Coordinates on Wikidata
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Azərbaycanca
Български
Català
Čeština
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Euskara
فارسی
Français
한국어
Hrvatski
Bahasa Indonesia
Italiano
עברית
Magyar
Bahasa Melayu
Nederlands
Norsk
Occitan
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
Српски / srpski
Srpskohrvatski / српскохрватски
Suomi
Svenska
தமிழ்
Татарча/tatarça
ไทย
Türkçe
Українська
Tiếng Việt
中文
31 more
Edit links
This page was last edited on 26 April 2018, at 07:31.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

value: mw-page-base noprint

value: mw-head-base noprint

value: firstHeading firstHeading en

value: siteSub noprint

value: jump-to-nav mw-jump

attr: class colspan style

attr: href class title

value:
/wiki/Second_World_War
mw-redirect
Second World War

tag: br

value: font-family:'Times New Roman','Old English Text MT',serif

value:
/wiki/Harold_Alexander
mw-redirect
Harold Alexander

value: Template talk:Campaignbox Western Desert

value:
/wiki/Bardia_raid
mw-redirect
Bardia raid

value: Middle East Command Camouflage Directorate

value:
/wiki/Special_Armored_Brigade
mw-redirect
Special Armored Brigade

value:
/wiki/Combe_Force
mw-redirect
Combe Force

value: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value: Help:Introduction to referencing with Wiki Markup/1

value: plainlinks metadata ambox ambox-content ambox-Refimprove

value: Second Battle of El Alamein order of battle

value: Chief of the General Staff (United Kingdom)

value: Harold Alexander, 1st Earl Alexander of Tunis

value: 4th Infantry Brigade and Headquarters North East

value:
/wiki/185th_Airborne_Division_Folgore
mw-redirect
185th Airborne Division Folgore

value: 90th Light Infantry Division (Wehrmacht)

value:
/wiki/German_21st_Panzer_Division
mw-redirect
German 21st Panzer Division

value:
/wiki/Italian_Ariete_Armoured_Division
mw-redirect
Italian Ariete Armoured Division

value:
/wiki/185_Airborne_Division_Folgore
mw-redirect
185 Airborne Division Folgore

value:
/wiki/17_Motorised_Division_Pavia
mw-redirect
17 Motorised Division Pavia

value:
/wiki/27_Motorised_Division_Brescia
mw-redirect
27 Motorised Division Brescia

value: British 51st (Highland) Infantry Division (World War II)

value:
/wiki/133_Armoured_Division_Littorio
mw-redirect
133 Armoured Division Littorio

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (March 2009)

value:
noprint Inline-Template Template-Fact
white-space:nowrap;

value: The text near this tag may need clarification or removal of jargon. (June 2014)

value:
noprint Inline-Template
margin-left:0.1em; white-space:nowrap;

value:
/wiki/102_Motorised_Division_Trento
mw-redirect
102 Motorised Division Trento

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (August 2013)

value:
/wiki/The_Rifle_Brigade
mw-redirect
The Rifle Brigade

value:
/wiki/Australian_9th_Division
mw-redirect
Australian 9th Division

value: Edit section: D + 7–9: 30 October – 1 November

value:
/wiki/William_Henry_Kibby
mw-redirect
William Henry Kibby

value: Edit section: Phase four: Operation Supercharge

value:
/wiki/British_9th_Armoured_Brigade
mw-redirect
British 9th Armoured Brigade

value:
/wiki/101_Motorised_Division_Trieste
mw-redirect
101 Motorised Division Trieste

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (April 2009)

value:
/wiki/Royal_Dragoons
mw-redirect
Royal Dragoons

value:
/wiki/5_cm_PaK_38
mw-redirect
5 cm PaK 38

value:
/wiki/Cannone_da_47/32_M35
mw-redirect
Cannone da 47/32 M35

value:
/wiki/Petrol_bombs
mw-redirect
Petrol bombs

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2008)

value: float: left; clear: left; margin: 0.5em 1.4em 0.8em 0; width:20%; padding: 10px; border: 1px solid #aaa; font-size: 88%; background-color: #F9F9F9;

value:
/wiki/25_Motorised_Division_Bologna
mw-redirect
25 Motorised Division Bologna

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (April 2008)

value:
toccolours collapsible collapsed
width:100%; background:transparent;
collapsibleTable1

value:
/wiki/Tunisia_Campaign
mw-redirect
Tunisia Campaign

value:
/wiki/Ordnance_QF_6_pounder
mw-redirect
Ordnance QF 6 pounder

value:
/wiki/2nd_Division_(New_Zealand)
mw-redirect
2nd Division (New Zealand)

value:
/wiki/British_First_Army
mw-redirect
British First Army

value: This claim needs references to reliable sources. (January 2014)

value:
/wiki/North_African_campaign
mw-redirect
North African campaign

value:
/wiki/Tunisia_Campaign#Axis_surrender
mw-redirect
Tunisia Campaign

value: display:table-cell;padding:0.2em 0.2em 0.2em 0.3em;vertical-align:middle

value: margin:0.5em 0 0.5em 1em;border:solid #aaa 1px

value:
/wiki/List_of_World_War_II_Battles
mw-redirect
List of World War II Battles

value:
/wiki/7.62_cm_PaK_36(r)
mw-redirect
7.62 cm PaK 36(r)

value:
/wiki/Ordnance_QF_2_pounder
mw-redirect
Ordnance QF 2 pounder

value:
/wiki/Polish_Mine_Detector
mw-redirect
Polish Mine Detector

value:
reflist columns references-column-width
list-style-type: lower-alpha;

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/557831458

value: -moz-column-width: 20em; -webkit-column-width: 20em; column-width: 20em; list-style-type: decimal;

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/464158829

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/24115733

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/10426023

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/3510044

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/610276818

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/60083169

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/313319483

value:
/wiki/Ian_Stanley_Ord_Playfair
mw-redirect
Ian Stanley Ord Playfair

value:
/wiki/James_Ramsay_Montagu_Butler
mw-redirect
James Ramsay Montagu Butler

value:
/wiki/Basil_Liddell-Hart
mw-redirect
Basil Liddell-Hart

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/0460044222

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/893102

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/852185369

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/3732838

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/721200796

value:
/wiki/Michael_Carver,_Baron_Carver
mw-redirect
Michael Carver, Baron Carver

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/954993

value:
nofollow
external text
//www.worldcat.org/oclc/504337535

value: commons:Category:Second Battle of El Alamein

value: width:22em;float: right; clear: right; margin:0 0 1.0em 1.0em

value: South-East Asian theatre of World War II

value: South West Pacific theatre of World War II

value: Mediterranean and Middle East theatre of World War II

value: List of military engagements of World War II

value: Military history of Australia during World War II

value: Military history of Canada during World War II

value: Military history of Greece during World War II

value: Military history of the Netherlands during World War II

value: Military history of New Zealand during World War II

value: Military history of the Philippines during World War II

value: Military history of South Africa during World War II

value: Military history of the United Kingdom during World War II

value: Military history of the United States during World War II

value: Military history of Bulgaria during World War II

value: Reorganized National Government of the Republic of China

value: Military history of Finland during World War II

value: Military history of Italy during World War II

value:
/wiki/Armed_neutrality
mw-redirect
Armed neutrality

value: Bulgarian resistance movement during World War II

value: Resistance in German-occupied Czechoslovakia

value: Estonian anti-German resistance movement 1941–44

value: Japanese dissidence during the early Shōwa period

value: Jewish resistance in German-occupied Europe

value: Latvian anti-Nazi resistance movement 1941–45

value: Resistance in Lithuania during World War II

value: Polish resistance movement in World War II

value: Romanian anti-communist resistance movement

value: Soviet occupation of Bessarabia and Northern Bukovina

value: Battle of Northern Burma and Western Yunnan

value:
/wiki/Timeline_of_World_War_II_(1945)
mw-redirect
Timeline of World War II (1945)

value:
/wiki/Raid_on_Taihoku
mw-redirect
Raid on Taihoku

value: Atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

value: Debate over the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki

value: Comparative officer ranks of World War II

value: United States home front during World War II

value: Australian home front during World War II

value: Timeline of the United Kingdom home front during World War II

value: Lists of World War II military equipment

value: Allied technological cooperation during World War II

value: Flight and expulsion of Germans (1944–50)

value: Military occupations by the Soviet Union

value: Treaty on the Final Settlement with Respect to Germany

value: Forced labour under German rule during World War II

value: International Military Tribunal for the Far East

value: The Holocaust in the Independent State of Croatia

value: German military brothels in World War II

value:
/wiki/Rape_of_Manila
mw-redirect
Rape of Manila

value: Finnish prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

value: German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

value: German prisoners of war in the United States

value: Italian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

value: Japanese prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

value: Japanese prisoners of war in World War II

value: German mistreatment of Soviet prisoners of war

value: Polish prisoners-of-war in the Soviet Union after 1939

value: Romanian prisoners of war in the Soviet Union

value: nowraplinks hlist collapsible collapsed navbox-inner

value: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value: Maps, aerial photos, and other data for this location

value: Category:Battles and operations of World War II involving Greece

value: Category:Battles and operations of World War II involving India

value: Category:Battles and operations of World War II involving South Africa

value: Category:Battles of World War II involving Australia

value: Category:Battles of World War II involving France

value: Category:Battles of World War II involving Germany

value: Category:Battles of World War II involving Italy

value: Category:Battles of World War II involving the United Kingdom

value: Category:Egypt–United Kingdom military relations

value: Category:Tank battles involving the United Kingdom

value: Category:Tank battles involving South Africa

value: Category:Articles needing additional references from November 2016

value: Category:All articles needing additional references

value: Category:All articles with unsourced statements

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from March 2009

value: Category:Wikipedia articles needing clarification from June 2014

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from August 2013

value: Category:Pages incorrectly using the quote template

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from April 2009

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2008

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from April 2008

value: Category:Articles with unsourced statements from January 2014

value: Category:CS1 French-language sources (fr)

value: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

value: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

value: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

value: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

value: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

value:
/wiki/Second_Battle_of_El_Alamein
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

value: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

value: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

value:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

value: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

value: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

value:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

value:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

value: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

value: Find background information on current events

value:
/wiki/Special:Random
Load a random article [ctrl-alt-x]
x

value: portal navigation p-navigation p-navigation-label

value: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

value: معركة العلمين الثانية – Arabic

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-az
display: none;

value: Втора битка при Ел Аламейн – Bulgarian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-bg
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ca
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-cs
display: none;

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-da badge-Q17559452 badge-recommendedarticle

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-de badge-Q17437798 badge-goodarticle

value: Δεύτερη μάχη του Ελ Αλαμέιν – Greek

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-el
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-eu
display: none;

value: نبرد دوم العلمین – Persian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fa
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fr
display: none;

value: 제2차 엘 알라메인 전투 – Korean

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ko
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hr
display: none;

value: Pertempuran El Alamein Kedua – Indonesian

value: Seconda battaglia di El Alamein – Italian

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-it badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

value: קרב אל-עלמיין השני – Hebrew

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-he
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-hu
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-nl
display: none;

value: Det andre slaget om El Alamein – Norwegian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-no
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-oc
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pl
display: none;

value: Segunda Batalha de El Alamein – Portuguese

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-pt
display: none;

value: A doua bătălie de la El Alamein – Romanian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ro
display: none;

value: Второе сражение при Эль-Аламейне – Russian

value: Second Battle of El Alamein – Simple English

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-simple
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sl
display: none;

value: Друга битка код Ел Аламејна – Serbian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sr
display: none;

value: Druga bitka kod El Alameina – Serbo-Croatian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sh
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-fi
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-sv
display: none;

value: இரண்டாம் அல்-அலமைன் சண்டை – Tamil

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-ta
display: none;

value: Әл-Әләмәйн янындагы икенче бәрелеш – Tatar

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tt
display: none;

value: ยุทธการที่เอล อาลาเมนครั้งที่สอง – Thai

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-th
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-tr
display: none;

value: Друга битва за Ель-Аламейн – Ukrainian

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-uk
display: none;

value:
interlanguage-link interwiki-vi
display: none;

value: 第二次阿拉曼战役 – Chinese

value: All languages (initial selection from common choices by you and others)

value: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Second_Battle_of_El_Alamein rootpage-Second_Battle_of_El_Alamein skin-vector action-view