text:
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster
STS-107 flight insignia
Date
February 1, 2003; 14 years ago (2003-02-01)
Time
08:59 EST (13:59 UTC)
Location
Over Texas and Louisiana
Cause
Wing damage from debris
Outcome
Space Shuttle fleet was grounded for more than two years while safety measures were added, including procedures to deal with catastrophic cabin depressurization, better crew restraints, and an automated parachute system.
Casualties
Rick D. Husband
William C. McCool
Michael P. Anderson
Kalpana Chawla
David M. Brown
Laurel Clark
Ilan Ramon
Inquiries
Columbia Accident Investigation Board
On February 1, 2003, the Space Shuttle Columbia disintegrated upon reentering Earth's atmosphere, killing all seven crew members. The disaster was the second fatal accident in the Space Shuttle program after Space Shuttle Challenger, which broke apart and killed the seven-member crew 73 seconds after liftoff in 1986.
During the launch of STS-107, Columbia's 28th mission, a piece of foam insulation broke off from the Space Shuttle external tank and struck the left wing of the orbiter. A few previous shuttle launches had seen damage ranging from minor to major from foam shedding,[1][2] but some engineers suspected that the damage to Columbia was more serious. NASA managers limited the investigation, reasoning that the crew could not have fixed the problem if it had been confirmed.[3] When Columbia re-entered the atmosphere of Earth, the damage allowed hot atmospheric gases to penetrate and destroy the internal wing structure, which caused the spacecraft to become unstable and break apart.[4]
After the disaster, Space Shuttle flight operations were suspended for more than two years, as they had been after the Challenger disaster. Construction of the International Space Station (ISS) was put on hold; the station relied entirely on the Russian Roscosmos State Corporation for resupply for 29 months until Shuttle flights resumed with STS-114 and 41 months for crew rotation until STS-121.
Several technical and organizational changes were made, including adding a thorough on-orbit inspection to determine how well the shuttle's thermal protection system had endured the ascent, and keeping a designated rescue mission ready in case irreparable damage was found. Except for one final mission to repair the Hubble Space Telescope, subsequent shuttle missions were flown only to the ISS so that the crew could use it as a haven in case damage to the orbiter prevented safe reentry.
Contents
[hide]
1 Crew
2 Debris strike during launch
3 Flight risk management
4 Re-entry timeline
5 Crew survivability aspects
6 Presidential response
7 Recovery of debris
7.1 Crew cabin video
8 Investigation
8.1 Initial investigation
8.2 Columbia Accident Investigation Board
8.3 Conclusions
8.4 Other contributing factors
8.5 Possible emergency procedures
9 Memorials
10 Effect on space programs
11 Sociocultural aftermath
11.1 Fears of terrorism
11.2 Purple streak image
11.3 2003 Armageddon film hoax
11.4 Music
12 See also
13 References
14 External links
Crew[edit]
The crew of STS-107 in October 2001. From left to right: Brown, Husband, Clark, Chawla, Anderson, McCool, Ramon
Commander: Rick D. Husband, a U.S. Air Force colonel and mechanical engineer, who piloted a previous shuttle during the first docking with the International Space Station (STS-96).
Pilot: William C. McCool, a U.S. Navy commander.
Payload Commander: Michael P. Anderson, a U.S. Air Force lieutenant colonel, physicist, and mission specialist who was in charge of the science mission.
Payload Specialist: Ilan Ramon, a colonel in the Israeli Air Force and the first Israeli astronaut.
Mission Specialist: Kalpana Chawla, aerospace engineer who was on her second space mission.
Mission Specialist: David M. Brown, a U.S. Navy captain trained as an aviator and flight surgeon. Brown worked on scientific experiments.
Mission Specialist: Laurel Blair Salton Clark, a U.S. Navy captain and flight surgeon. Clark worked on biological experiments.
Debris strike during launch[edit]
Columbia lifting off on its final mission. The light-colored triangle visible at the base of the strut near the nose of the orbiter is the Left Bipod Foam Ramp. Video
Space Shuttle external tank foam block
Close-up of the Left Bipod Foam Ramp that broke off and damaged the Shuttle wing
The shuttle's main fuel tank is covered in thermal insulation foam intended to prevent ice from forming when the tank is full of liquid hydrogen and oxygen. Such ice could damage the shuttle if shed during lift-off.
Mission STS-107 was the 113th Space Shuttle launch. Planned to begin on January 11, 2001, the mission was delayed 18 times[5] and eventually launched on January 16, 2003, following STS-113. (The Columbia Accident Investigation Board determined that this delay had nothing to do with the catastrophic failure.)[5]
About 82 seconds after launch from Kennedy Space Center's LC-39-A, a suitcase-sized piece of foam broke off from the External Tank (ET), striking Columbia's left wing reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) panels. As demonstrated by ground experiments conducted by the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, this likely created a 6-to-10-inch (15 to 25 cm) diameter hole, allowing hot gases to enter the wing when Columbia later re-entered the atmosphere. At the time of the foam strike, the orbiter was at an altitude of about 66,000 feet (20 km; 12.5 mi), traveling at Mach 2.46 (1,626 miles per hour or 727 meters per second).
The Left Bipod Foam Ramp is an approximately three-foot (one-meter) long aerodynamic component made entirely of foam. The foam, not normally considered to be a structural material, is required to bear some aerodynamic loads. Because of these special requirements, the casting-in-place and curing of the ramps may be performed only by a senior technician.[6] The bipod ramp (having left and right sides) was originally designed to reduce aerodynamic stresses around the bipod attachment points at the external tank, but it was proven unnecessary in the wake of the accident and was removed from the external tank design for tanks flown after STS-107 (another foam ramp along the liquid oxygen line was also later removed from the tank design to eliminate it as a foam debris source, after analysis and tests proved this change safe).
Bipod Ramp insulation had been observed falling off, in whole or in part, on four previous flights: STS-7 (1983), STS-32 (1990), STS-50 (1992) and most recently STS-112 (just two launches before STS-107). All affected shuttle missions completed successfully. NASA management came to refer to this phenomenon as "foam shedding". As with the O-ring erosion problems that ultimately doomed the Space Shuttle Challenger, NASA management became accustomed to these phenomena when no serious consequences resulted from these earlier episodes. This phenomenon was termed "normalization of deviance" by sociologist Diane Vaughan in her book on the Challenger launch decision process.[7]
As it happened, STS-112 had been the first flight with the "ET Cam", a video feed mounted on the ET for the purpose of giving greater insight to the foam shedding problem. During that launch a chunk of foam broke away from the ET bipod ramp and hit the SRB-ET Attach Ring near the bottom of the left solid rocket booster (SRB) causing a dent four inches wide and three inches deep in it.[8] After STS-112, NASA leaders analyzed the situation and decided to press ahead under the justification that "[t]he ET is safe to fly with no new concerns (and no added risk)" of further foam strikes.[9]
Video taken during lift-off of STS-107 was routinely reviewed two hours later and revealed nothing unusual. The following day, higher-resolution film that had been processed overnight revealed the foam debris striking the left wing, potentially damaging the thermal protection on the Space Shuttle.[10] At the time, the exact location where the foam struck the wing could not be determined due to the low resolution of the tracking camera footage.
Meanwhile, NASA's judgment about the risks was revisited. Linda Ham, chair of the Mission Management Team (MMT), said, "Rationale was lousy then and still is." Ham and Shuttle Program Manager Ron Dittemore had both been present at the October 31, 2002, meeting where the decision to continue with launches was made.[11]
Post-disaster analysis revealed that two previous shuttle launches (STS-52 and -62) also had bipod ramp foam loss that went undetected. In addition, Protuberance Air Load (PAL) ramp foam had also shed pieces, and there were also spot losses from large-area foams.
Flight risk management[edit]
In a risk-management scenario similar to the Challenger disaster, NASA management failed to recognize the relevance of engineering concerns for safety and suggestions for imaging to inspect possible damage, and failed to respond to engineers' requests about the status of astronaut inspection of the left wing. Engineers made three separate requests for Department of Defense (DOD) imaging of the shuttle in orbit to determine damage more precisely. While the images were not guaranteed to show the damage, the capability existed for imaging of sufficient resolution to provide meaningful examination. NASA management did not honor the requests and in some cases intervened to stop the DOD from assisting.[12] The CAIB recommended subsequent shuttle flights be imaged while in orbit using ground-based or space-based DOD assets.[13] Details of the DOD's unfulfilled participation with Columbia remain secret; retired NASA official Wayne Hale stated in 2012 that "activity regarding other national assets and agencies remains classified and I cannot comment on that aspect of the Columbia tragedy".[14]
Throughout the risk assessment process, senior NASA managers were influenced by their belief that nothing could be done even if damage were detected. This affected their stance on investigation urgency, thoroughness and possible contingency actions. They decided to conduct a parametric "what-if" scenario study more suited to determine risk probabilities of future events, instead of inspecting and assessing the actual damage. The investigation report in particular singled out NASA manager Linda Ham for exhibiting this attitude.[15] In 2013, Hale recalled that Director of Mission Operations Jon C. Harpold shared with him before Columbia's destruction a mindset which Hale himself later agreed was widespread at the time, even among the astronauts themselves:
You know, there is nothing we can do about damage to the TPS [Thermal Protection System]. If it has been damaged it's probably better not to know. I think the crew would rather not know. Don't you think it would be better for them to have a happy successful flight and die unexpectedly during entry than to stay on orbit, knowing that there was nothing to be done, until the air ran out?[16]
Much of the risk assessment hinged on damage predictions to the thermal protection system. These fall into two categories: damage to the silica tile on the wing lower surface, and damage to the reinforced carbon-carbon (RCC) leading-edge panels. The TPS includes a third category of components, thermal insulating blankets, but damage predictions are not typically performed on them. Damage assessments on the thermal blankets can be performed after an anomaly has been observed, and this has been done at least once after the return to flight following Columbia's loss.
Before the flight NASA believed that the RCC was very durable. Charles F. Bolden, who worked on tile-damage scenarios and repair methods early in his astronaut career, said in 2004 that:[17]
never did we talk about [the RCC] because we all thought that it was impenetrable ... I spent fourteen years in the space program flying, thinking that I had this huge mass that was about five or six inches thick on the leading edge of the wing. And, to find after Columbia that it was fractions of an inch thick, and that it wasn't as strong as the Fiberglass on your Corvette, that was an eye-opener, and I think for all of us ... the best minds that I know of, in and outside of NASA, never envisioned that as a failure mode.
Damage-prediction software was used to evaluate possible tile and RCC damage. The tool for predicting tile damage was known as "Crater", described by several NASA representatives in press briefings as not actually a software program but rather a statistical spreadsheet of observed past flight events and effects. The "Crater" tool predicted severe penetration of multiple tiles by the impact if it struck the TPS tile area, but NASA engineers downplayed this. It had been shown that the model overstated damage from small projectiles, and engineers believed that the model would also overstate damage from larger Spray-On Foam Insulation (SOFI) impacts. The program used to predict RCC damage was based on small ice impacts the size of cigarette butts, not larger SOFI impacts, as the ice impacts were the only recognized threats to RCC panels up to that point. Under one of 15 predicted SOFI impact paths, the software predicted an ice impact would completely penetrate the RCC panel. Engineers downplayed this, too, believing that impacts of the less dense SOFI material would result in less damage than ice impacts. In an e-mail exchange, NASA managers questioned whether the density of the SOFI could be used as justification for reducing predicted damage. Despite engineering concerns about the energy imparted by the SOFI material, NASA managers ultimately accepted the rationale to reduce predicted damage of the RCC panels from possible complete penetration to slight damage to the panel's thin coating.[18]
Ultimately the NASA Mission Management Team felt there was insufficient evidence to indicate that the strike was an unsafe situation, so they declared the debris strike a "turnaround" issue (not of highest importance) and denied the requests for the Department of Defense images.
On January 23, flight director Steve Stich sent an e-mail to Columbia, informing commander Husband and pilot McCool of the foam strike while unequivocally dismissing any concerns about entry safety.[19][20]
During ascent at approximately 80 seconds, photo analysis shows that some debris from the area of the -Y ET Bipod Attach Point came loose and subsequently impacted the orbiter left wing, in the area of transition from Chine to Main Wing, creating a shower of smaller particles. The impact appears to be totally on the lower surface and no particles are seen to traverse over the upper surface of the wing. Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen this same phenomenon on several other flights and there is absolutely no concern for entry.[21]
Edward Tufte, an expert in information design and presentation,[22] remarked on poor modes of communication during the assessment made on the ground, before Columbia's reentry. NASA and Boeing favored Microsoft PowerPoint for conveying information. PowerPoint uses multi-level bullet points and orients towards single-page-of-information groupings. This is not ideal for complex scientific and engineering reports, and may have caused recipients to draw incorrect conclusions. In particular, the slide format may have emphasized optimistic options and glossed over the more accurate pessimistic viewpoints.[23]
Re-entry timeline[edit]
Columbia was scheduled to land at 9:16 a.m. EST.
2:30 a.m. EST, February 1, 2003: The Entry Flight Control Team began duty in the Mission Control Center (known today as the Christopher C. Kraft Jr. Mission Control Center).
The Flight Control Team had not been working on any issues or problems related to the planned de-orbit and re-entry of Columbia. In particular, the team had indicated no concerns about the debris that hit the left wing during ascent, and treated the re-entry like any other. The team worked through the de-orbit preparation checklist and re-entry checklist procedures. Weather forecasters, with the help of pilots in the Shuttle Training Aircraft, evaluated landing-site weather conditions at the Kennedy Space Center.
8:00: Mission Control Center Entry Flight Director LeRoy Cain polled the Mission Control room for a GO/NO-GO decision for the de-orbit burn.
All weather observations and forecasts were within guidelines set by the flight rules, and all systems were normal.
8:10: The Capsule Communicator (CAPCOM) told the crew that they were GO for de-orbit burn.
8:15:30 (EI-1719): Husband and McCool executed the de-orbit burn using Columbia’s two Orbital Maneuvering System engines.
The Orbiter was upside down and tail-first over the Indian Ocean at an altitude of 175 miles (282 km) and speed of 17,500 miles per hour (7.8 km/s) when the burn was executed. A 2-minute, 38-second de-orbit burn during the 255th orbit slowed the Orbiter to begin its re-entry into the atmosphere. The burn proceeded normally, putting the crew under about one-tenth gravity. Husband then turned Columbia right side up, facing forward with the nose pitched up.
8:44:09 (EI+000): Entry Interface (EI), arbitrarily defined as the point at which the Orbiter entered the discernible atmosphere at 400,000 feet (120 km; 76 mi), occurred over the Pacific Ocean.
As Columbia descended, the heat of reentry caused wing leading-edge temperatures to rise steadily, reaching an estimated 2,500 °F (1,370 °C) during the next six minutes. (As former Space Shuttle Program Manager Wayne Hale said in a press briefing, about 90% of this heating is the result of compression of the atmospheric gas caused by the orbiter's supersonic flight, rather than the result of friction.)
Columbia at about 8:57. Debris is visible coming from the left wing (bottom). The image was taken at Starfire Optical Range at Kirtland Air Force Base.
8:48:39 (EI+270): A sensor on the left wing leading edge spar showed strains higher than those seen on previous Columbia re-entries.
This was recorded only on the Modular Auxiliary Data System, which is similar in concept to a flight data recorder, and was not sent to ground controllers or shown to the crew.
8:49:32 (EI+323): Columbia executed a planned roll to the right. Speed: Mach 24.5.
Columbia began a banking turn to manage lift and therefore limit the Orbiter's rate of descent and heating.
8:50:53 (EI+404): Columbia entered a 10-minute period of peak heating, during which the thermal stresses were at their maximum. Speed: Mach 24.1; altitude: 243,000 feet (74 km; 46.0 mi).
8:52:00 (EI+471): Columbia was about 300 miles (480 km) west of the California coastline.
The wing leading-edge temperatures usually reached 2,650 °F (1,450 °C) at this point.
8:53:26 (EI+557): Columbia crossed the California coast west of Sacramento. Speed: Mach 23; altitude: 231,600 feet (70.6 km; 43.86 mi).
Columbia debris (in red, orange, and yellow) detected by National Weather Service radar over Texas and Louisiana
The Orbiter's wing leading edge typically reached more than 2,800 °F (1,540 °C) at this point.
8:53:46 (EI+577): Various people on the ground saw signs of debris being shed. Speed: Mach 22.8; altitude: 230,200 feet (70.2 km; 43.60 mi).
The superheated air surrounding the Orbiter suddenly brightened, causing a streak in the Orbiter's luminescent trail that was quite noticeable in the pre-dawn skies over the West Coast. Observers witnessed four similar events during the following 23 seconds. Dialogue on some of the amateur footage indicates the observers were aware of the abnormality of what they were filming.
8:54:24 (EI+615): The Maintenance, Mechanical, and Crew Systems (MMACS) officer told the Flight Director that four hydraulic sensors in the left wing were indicating "off-scale low". In Mission Control, re-entry had been proceeding normally up to this point.
"Off-scale low" is a reading that falls below the minimum capability of the sensor, and it usually indicates that the sensor has stopped functioning, due to internal or external factors, not that the quantity it measures is actually below the sensor's minimum response value.
8:54:25 (EI+616): Columbia crossed from California into Nevada airspace. Speed: Mach 22.5; altitude: 227,400 feet (69.3 km; 43.07 mi).
Witnesses observed a bright flash at this point and 18 similar events in the next four minutes.
8:55:00 (EI+651): Nearly 11 minutes after Columbia re-entered the atmosphere, wing leading-edge temperatures normally reached nearly 3,000 °F (1,650 °C).
8:55:32 (EI+683): Columbia crossed from Nevada into Utah. Speed: Mach 21.8; altitude: 223,400 feet (68.1 km; 42.31 mi).
8:55:52 (EI+703): Columbia crossed from Utah into Arizona.
8:56:30 (EI+741): Columbia began a roll reversal, turning from right to left over Arizona.
8:56:45 (EI+756): Columbia crossed from Arizona to New Mexico. Speed: Mach 20.9; altitude: 219,000 feet (67 km; 41.5 mi).
8:57:24 (EI+795): Columbia passed just north of Albuquerque.
8:58:00 (EI+831): At this point, wing leading-edge temperatures typically decreased to 2,880 °F (1,580 °C).
8:58:20 (EI+851): Columbia crossed from New Mexico into Texas. Speed: Mach 19.5; altitude: 209,800 feet (63.9 km; 39.73 mi).
At about this time, the Orbiter shed a Thermal Protection System tile, the most westerly piece of debris that has been recovered. Searchers found the tile in a field in Littlefield, Texas, just northwest of Lubbock.
8:59:15 (EI+906): MMACS told the Flight Director that pressure readings had been lost on both left main landing-gear tires. The Flight Director then instructed the Capsule Communicator (CAPCOM) to let the crew know that Mission Control saw the messages and was evaluating the indications, and added that the Flight Control Team did not understand the crew's last transmission.
8:59:32 (EI+923): A broken response from the mission commander was recorded: "Roger, uh, bu – [cut off in mid-word] ..." It was the last communication from the crew and the last telemetry signal received in Mission Control.
8:59:37 (EI+928): Hydraulic pressure, which is required to move the flight control surfaces, was lost at about 8:59:37. At that time, the Master Alarm would have sounded for the loss of hydraulics, and the shuttle would have begun to lose control, starting to roll and yaw uncontrollably, and the crew would have become aware of the serious problem.[24]
9:00:18 (EI+969): Videos and eyewitness reports by observers on the ground in and near Dallas indicated that the Orbiter had disintegrated overhead, continued to break up into smaller pieces, and left multiple ion trails, as it continued eastward. In Mission Control, while the loss of signal was a cause for concern, there was no sign of any serious problem. Before the orbiter broke up at 9:00:18, the Columbia cabin pressure was nominal and the crew was capable of conscious actions.[24] Although the crew module remained mostly intact through the breakup, it was damaged enough that it lost pressure at a rate fast enough to incapacitate the crew within seconds,[25] and was completely depressurized no later than 9:00:53.
9:00:57 (EI+1008): The crew module, intact to this point, was seen breaking into small subcomponents. It disappeared from view at 9:01:10. The crew, if not already dead, were killed no later than this point.
9:05: Residents of north central Texas, particularly near Tyler, reported a loud boom, a small concussion wave, smoke trails and debris in the clear skies above the counties east of Dallas.
9:12:39 (EI+1710): After hearing of reports of the shuttle being seen to break apart, Entry Flight Director LeRoy Cain declared a contingency (events leading to loss of the vehicle) and alerted search-and-rescue teams in the debris area. He called on the Ground Controller to "lock the doors", meaning no one would be permitted to enter or leave until everything needed for investigation of the accident had been secured.[26] Two minutes later, Mission Control put contingency procedures into effect.
Crew survivability aspects[edit]
In 2008, NASA released a detailed report on survivability aspects of the Columbia reentry. The crew would have had less than a minute between the beginning of orbiter disintegration and depressurization. The structural failure of the left wing set off alarms in the cabin, although they had no way of knowing that the wing had broken apart as the rear of the orbiter could not be seen from the cabin. All evidence indicated that the crew frantically tried to regain control of Columbia as it began to spin out of control, but the loss of the left wing caused the orbiter to yaw to the right, exposing its underside to extreme aerodynamic forces and causing total structural disintegration. The crew cabin separated from the rest of the orbiter and rapidly depressurized, which would have killed or incapacitated the astronauts within seconds. Afterwards, the cabin spun around at high RPM, which caused the seat restraints on their upper bodies to fail. They were thus whipped around violently and pummeled by flying and falling objects from the disintegrating cabin, along with their heads and necks being slammed against the helmets, which were not designed to provide any head protection. Even if the cabin had remained structurally intact and reached a lower altitude where air could refill it, the high altitude depressurization would have been fatal to the astronauts unless they received medical attention within 5 minutes, approximately the amount of time it would take between cerebral hypoxia and brain death.
After cabin disintegration, the astronauts' bodies were released into the upper atmosphere and battered by extreme aerodynamic forces (close to 14,000 MPH) and temperatures. The remains of the crew then fell some 200,000 feet to earth, where they were also subjected to burning from aerodynamic heating. The official NASA report omitted some of the more graphic details on the recovery of the remains, however witnesses reported various gruesome finds such as a human heart and parts of femur bones.[27]
All evidence indicated that crew error was in no way responsible for the disintegration of the orbiter, and they had acted correctly and according to procedure at the first indication of trouble. Although some of the crew were not wearing gloves or helmets during reentry and some were not properly restrained in their seats, doing these things would have added nothing to their survival chances other than perhaps keeping them alive and conscious another 30 or so seconds.[28]
Presidential response[edit]
President George W. Bush's address on the Columbia's destruction, February 1, 2003
At 14:04 EST (19:04 UTC), President George W. Bush said, "This day has brought terrible news and great sadness to our country ... The Columbia is lost; there are no survivors". Despite the disaster, Bush said, "The cause in which they died will continue....Our journey into space will go on".[29] Bush later declared East Texas a federal disaster area, allowing federal agencies to help with the recovery effort.[30]
Recovery of debris[edit]
A grid on the floor is used to organize recovered debris
Recovered power-head of one of Columbia's main engines
More than 2,000 debris fields were found in sparsely populated areas from Nacogdoches in East Texas, where a large amount of debris fell, to western Louisiana and the southwestern counties of Arkansas. A large amount of debris was recovered between Tyler, Texas and Palestine, Texas. One debris field has been mapped along a path stretching from south of Fort Worth to Hemphill, Texas, as well as into parts of Louisiana.[31] Various notable places that had debris included Stephen F. Austin State University in Nacogdoches and several casinos in Shreveport, Louisiana.[31] Along with pieces of the shuttle and bits of equipment, searchers also found human body parts, including arms, feet, a torso, and a heart.[32]
In the months after the disaster, the largest-ever organized ground search took place.[33] Thousands of volunteers descended upon Texas to participate in the effort to gather the Shuttle’s remains. According to Mike Ciannilli, Project Manager of the Columbia Research and Preservation Office, "[these people] put their life on hold to help out the nation’s space program,” showing “what space means to people.”[34] NASA issued warnings to the public that any debris could contain hazardous chemicals, that it should be left untouched, its location reported to local emergency services or government authorities, and that anyone in unauthorized possession of debris would be prosecuted. Because of the widespread area, volunteer amateur radio operators accompanied the search teams to provide communications support.[35]
A group of small (1 mm) adult Caenorhabditis elegans worms, living in petri dishes enclosed in aluminum canisters, survived reentry and impact with the ground and were recovered weeks after the disaster.[36][37] The culture was found to be alive on April 28, 2003.[38] The worms were part of a biological research in canisters experiment designed to study the effect of weightlessness on physiology; the experiment was conducted by Cassie Conley, NASA's planetary protection officer.
Debris Search Pilot Jules F. Mier Jr. and Debris Search Aviation Specialist Charles Krenek died in a helicopter crash that injured three others during the search.[39]
Some Texas residents recovered some of the debris, ignoring the warnings, and attempted to sell it on the online auction site eBay, starting at $10,000. The auction was quickly removed, but prices for Columbia merchandise such as programs, photographs and patches, went up dramatically following the disaster, creating a surge of Columbia-related listings.[40] A three-day amnesty offered for "looted" shuttle debris brought in hundreds of illegally recovered pieces.[41] About 40,000 recovered pieces of debris have never been identified. The largest pieces recovered include the front landing gear,[42] and a window frame.[43]
The glow of reentry as seen out the front windows
On May 9, 2008, it was reported that data from a disk drive on board Columbia had survived the shuttle accident, and while part of the 340 MB drive was damaged, 99% of the data was recovered.[44] The drive was used to store data from an experiment on the properties of shear thinning.[45]
On July 29, 2011, Nacogdoches authorities told NASA that a 4-foot (1.2 m) diameter piece of debris had been found in a lake. NASA identified the piece as a power reactant storage and distribution (PRSD).[46][not in citation given]
All recovered non-human Columbia debris is stored in unused office space at the Vehicle Assembly Building, except for parts of the crew compartment, which are kept separate.[47]
Crew cabin video[edit]
Play media
Video taken by the crew of part of re-entry
Among the recovered items was a videotape recording made by the astronauts during the start of re-entry. The 13-minute recording shows the flight crew astronauts conducting routine re-entry procedures and joking with each other. None gives any indication of a problem. In the video, the flight-deck crew puts on their gloves and passes the video camera around to record plasma and flames visible outside the windows of the orbiter (a normal occurrence). The recording, which on normal flights would have continued through landing, ends about four minutes before the shuttle began to disintegrate and 11 minutes before Mission Control lost the signal from the orbiter.[48]
Investigation[edit]
Initial investigation[edit]
Mock-up of a Space Shuttle leading edge made with an RCC-panel taken from Discovery. Simulation of known and possible conditions of the foam impact on Columbia's final launch showed brittle fracture of RCC.
NASA Space Shuttle Program Manager Ron Dittemore reported that "The first indication was loss of temperature sensors and hydraulic systems on the left wing. They were followed seconds and minutes later by several other problems, including loss of tire pressure indications on the left main gear and then indications of excessive structural heating".[49] Analysis of 31 seconds of telemetry data which had initially been filtered out because of data corruption within it showed the shuttle fighting to maintain its orientation, eventually using maximum thrust from its Reaction Control System jets.
The investigation focused on the foam strike from the very beginning. Incidents of debris strikes from ice and foam causing damage during take-off were already well known, and had damaged orbiters, most noticeably during STS-45, STS-27, and STS-87.[50] After the loss of Columbia, NASA concluded that mistakes during installation were the likely cause of foam loss, and retrained employees at Michoud Assembly Facility in Louisiana to apply foam without defects.[14] Tile damage had also been traced to ablating insulating material from the cryogenic fuel tank in the past. The composition of the foam insulation had been changed in 1997 to exclude the use of freon, a chemical that is suspected to cause ozone depletion; while NASA was exempted from legislation phasing out CFCs, the agency chose to change the foam nonetheless. STS-107 used an older "lightweight tank" (a design that was succeeded by the "superlightweight tank", both being upgrades from the original space shuttle external tank) where the foam was sprayed on to the larger cylindrical surfaces using the newer freon-free foam. However, the bipod ramps were manufactured from BX-250 foam which was excluded from the EPA regulations and did use the original freon formula. The composition change did not contribute to the accident.[51] In any case, the original formulation had shown frequent foam losses, as discussed earlier in this article.
Columbia Accident Investigation Board[edit]
Main article: Columbia Accident Investigation Board
Following protocols established after the loss of Challenger, an independent investigating board was created immediately after the accident. The Columbia Accident Investigation Board, or CAIB, was chaired by retired US Navy Admiral Harold W. Gehman, Jr.,[52] and consisted of expert military and civilian analysts who investigated the accident in detail.
Columbia's flight data recorder was found near Hemphill, Texas, on March 19, 2003.[53] Unlike commercial jet aircraft, the space shuttles did not have flight data recorders intended for after-crash analysis. Instead, the vehicle data were transmitted in real time to the ground via telemetry. Since Columbia was the first shuttle, it had a special flight data OEX (Orbiter EXperiments) recorder, designed to help engineers better understand vehicle performance during the first test flights. After the initial Shuttle test-flights were completed, the recorder was never removed from Columbia, and it was still functioning on the crashed flight. It recorded many hundreds of parameters, and contained very extensive logs of structural and other data, which allowed the CAIB to reconstruct many of the events during the process leading to breakup.[54] Investigators could often use the loss of signals from sensors on the wing to track how the damage progressed.[55] This was correlated with forensic debris analysis conducted at Lehigh University and other tests to obtain a final conclusion about the probable course of events.[56]
Beginning on May 30, 2003, foam impact tests were performed by Southwest Research Institute. They used a compressed air gun to fire a foam block of similar size and mass to that which struck Columbia, at the same estimated speed. To represent the leading edge of Columbia's left wing, RCC panels from NASA stock, along with the actual leading-edge panels from Enterprise, which were fiberglass, were mounted to a simulating structural metal frame. At the beginning of testing, the likely impact site was estimated to be between RCC panel 6 and 9, inclusive. Over many days, dozens of the foam blocks were shot at the wing leading edge model at various angles. These produced only cracks or surface damage to the RCC panels.
During June, further analysis of information from Columbia's flight data recorder narrowed the probable impact site to one single panel: RCC wing panel 8. On July 7, in a final round of testing, a block fired at the side of an RCC panel 8 created a hole 16 by 16.7 inches (41 by 42 cm) in that protective RCC panel.[57] The tests demonstrated that a foam impact of the type Columbia sustained could seriously breach the thermal protection system on the wing leading edge.[58]
Conclusions[edit]
On August 26, 2003, the CAIB issued its report on the accident. The report confirmed the immediate cause of the accident was a breach in the leading edge of the left wing, caused by insulating foam shed during launch. The report also delved deeply into the underlying organizational and cultural issues that led to the accident. The report was highly critical of NASA's decision-making and risk-assessment processes. It concluded the organizational structure and processes were sufficiently flawed and that a compromise of safety was expected no matter who was in the key decision-making positions. An example was the position of Shuttle Program Manager, where one individual was responsible for achieving safe, timely launches and acceptable costs, which are often conflicting goals. The CAIB report found that NASA had accepted deviations from design criteria as normal when they happened on several flights and did not lead to mission-compromising consequences. One of those was the conflict between a design specification stating that the thermal protection system was not designed to withstand significant impacts and the common occurrence of impact damage to it during flight. The board made recommendations for significant changes in processes and organizational culture.
On December 30, 2008, NASA released a further report, entitled Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report, produced by a second commission, the Spacecraft Crew Survival Integrated Investigation Team (SCSIIT). NASA had commissioned this group, "to perform a comprehensive analysis of the accident, focusing on factors and events affecting crew survival, and to develop recommendations for improving crew survival for all future human space flight vehicles."[59] The report concluded that: "The Columbia depressurization event occurred so rapidly that the crew members were incapacitated within seconds, before they could configure the suit for full protection from loss of cabin pressure. Although circulatory systems functioned for a brief time, the effects of the depressurization were severe enough that the crew could not have regained consciousness. This event was lethal to the crew."
The report also concluded:
The crew did not have time to prepare themselves. Some crew members were not wearing their safety gloves, and one crew member was not wearing a helmet. New policies gave the crew more time to prepare for descent.
The crew's safety harnesses malfunctioned during the violent descent. The harnesses on the three remaining shuttles were upgraded after the accident.
The key recommendations of the report included that future spacecraft crew survival systems should not rely on manual activation to protect the crew.[60]
Other contributing factors[edit]
Unintended consequences of decisions contributed to the failure: the original tank white paint was removed to save 600 lb (270 kg), exposing the rust-orange-colored foam; the tank foam chemical composition was altered to meet Environmental Protection Agency requirements, weakening it; upgrades to the leading edge proposed in the early 1990s were not funded because NASA was working on the doomed VentureStar single-stage-to-orbit shuttle replacement.[61]
Possible emergency procedures[edit]
One question of special importance was whether NASA could have saved the astronauts had they known of the danger.[62] This would have to involve either rescue or repair – docking at the International Space Station for use as a haven while awaiting rescue (or to use the Soyuz to systematically ferry the crew to safety) would have been impossible due to the different orbital inclination of the vehicles.
The CAIB determined that a rescue mission, though risky, might have been possible provided NASA management had taken action soon enough.[63][64] Normally, a rescue mission is not possible, due to the time required to prepare a shuttle for launch, and the limited consumables (power, water, air) of an orbiting shuttle. However, Atlantis was well along in processing for a planned March 1 launch on STS-114, and Columbia carried an unusually large quantity of consumables due to an Extended Duration Orbiter package. The CAIB determined that this would have allowed Columbia to stay in orbit until flight day 30 (February 15). NASA investigators determined that Atlantis processing could have been expedited with no skipped safety checks for a February 10 launch. Hence, if nothing went wrong, there was a five-day overlap for a possible rescue. As mission control could deorbit an empty shuttle, but could not control the orbiter's reentry and landing, it would likely have sent Columbia into the Pacific Ocean;[64] NASA later developed the Remote Control Orbiter system to permit mission control to land a shuttle.
NASA investigators determined that on-orbit repair by the shuttle astronauts was possible but overall considered "high risk", primarily due to the uncertain resiliency of the repair using available materials and the anticipated high risk of doing additional damage to the Orbiter.[63][64] Columbia did not carry the Canadarm, or Remote Manipulator System, which would normally be used for camera inspection or transporting a spacewalking astronaut to the wing. Therefore, an unusual emergency extra-vehicular activity (EVA) would have been required. While there was no astronaut EVA training for maneuvering to the wing, astronauts are always prepared for a similarly difficult emergency EVA to close the external tank umbilical doors located on the orbiter underside, which is necessary for reentry. Similar methods could have reached the shuttle left wing for inspection or repair.[64]
For the repair, the CAIB determined that the astronauts would have to use tools and small pieces of titanium, or other metal, scavenged from the crew cabin. These metals would help protect the wing structure and would be held in place during re-entry by a water-filled bag that had turned into ice in the cold of space. The ice and metal would help restore wing leading edge geometry, preventing a turbulent airflow over the wing and therefore keeping heating and burn-through levels low enough for the crew to survive re-entry and bail out before landing. The CAIB could not determine whether a patched-up left wing would have survived even a modified re-entry, and concluded that the rescue option would have had a considerably higher chance of bringing Columbia's crew back alive.[63][64]
Memorials[edit]
On February 4, 2003, President George W. Bush and his wife Laura led a memorial service for the astronauts' families at the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center. Two days later, Vice President Dick Cheney and his wife Lynne led a similar service at Washington National Cathedral. Patti LaBelle sang "Way Up There" as part of the service.[65]
A makeshift memorial at the main entrance to the Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center in Houston, Texas
Columbia Memorial in Arlington National Cemetery
Columbia memorial on Mars Exploration Rover "Spirit"
Space Shuttle Columbia memorial – Sabine County, Texas
On February 2, 2003, and throughout March, April, and May 2003, large memorial Catholic Brazilian masses and Roman Catholic memorial concerts were held in Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo, and other cities in Brazil where Brazilian Catholic priest Marcelo Rossi and his concert partner Belo sang a Christian hymn "Noites Traicoeiras" (Treacherous Nights) as tribute to the seven Columbia astronauts, as well as the other seven crew members who lost their lives in the Space Shuttle Challenger disaster in 1986. The concerts were televised to millions throughout Brazil and the world.
On March 26, the United States House of Representatives' Science Committee approved funds for the construction of a memorial at Arlington National Cemetery for the STS-107 crew. A similar memorial was built at the cemetery for the last crew of Challenger. On October 28, 2003, the names of the astronauts were added to the Space Mirror Memorial at the Kennedy Space Center Visitor Complex.
On April 1, 2003, the Opening Day of baseball season, the Houston Astros (named in honor of the U.S. space program) honored the Columbia crew by having seven simultaneous first pitches thrown by family and friends of the crew. For the National Anthem, 107 NASA personnel, including flight controllers and others involved in Columbia's final mission, carried a U.S. flag onto the field. In addition, the Astros wore the mission patch on their sleeves and replaced all dugout advertising with the mission patch logo for the entire season.[66]
On February 1, 2004, the first anniversary of the Columbia disaster, Super Bowl XXXVIII held in Houston's Reliant Stadium began with a pregame tribute to the crew of the Columbia by singer Josh Groban performing "You Raise Me Up", with the crew of STS-114, the first post-Columbia Space Shuttle mission, in attendance.[67][68]
In 2004, Bush conferred posthumous Congressional Space Medals of Honor to all 14 crew members lost in the Challenger and Columbia accidents.[69]
NASA named several places in honor of Columbia and the crew. Seven asteroids discovered in July 2001 at the Mount Palomar observatory were officially given the names of the seven astronauts: 51823 Rickhusband, 51824 Mikeanderson, 51825 Davidbrown, 51826 Kalpanachawla, 51827 Laurelclark, 51828 Ilanramon, 51829 Williemccool.[70] On Mars, the landing site of the rover Spirit was named Columbia Memorial Station, and included a memorial plaque to the Columbia crew mounted on the back of the high gain antenna. A complex of seven hills east of the Spirit landing site was dubbed the Columbia Hills; each of the seven hills was individually named for a member of the crew, and Husband Hill in particular was ascended and explored by the rover. In 2006, the IAU approved naming of a cluster of seven small craters in the Apollo basin on the far side of the Moon after the astronauts.[71] Back on Earth, NASA's National Scientific Balloon Facility was renamed the Columbia Scientific Balloon Facility.
Other tributes included the decision by Amarillo, Texas, to rename its airport Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport after the Amarillo native. Washington State Route 904 was renamed Lt. Michael P. Anderson Memorial Highway, as it runs through Cheney, Washington, the town where he graduated from high school. A newly constructed elementary school located on Fairchild Air Force Base near Spokane, Washington, was named Michael Anderson Elementary School. Anderson had attended fifth grade at Blair Elementary, the base's previous elementary school, while his father was stationed there. A mountain peak near Kit Carson Peak and Challenger Point in the Sangre de Cristo Range was renamed Columbia Point, and a dedication plaque was placed on the point in August, 2003. Seven dormitories were named in honor of Columbia crew members at the Florida Institute of Technology, Creighton University, The University of Texas at Arlington, and the Columbia Elementary School in the Brevard County School District. The Huntsville City Schools in Huntsville, Alabama, a city strongly associated with NASA, named their most recent high school Columbia High School as a memorial to the crew. A Department of Defense school in Guam was renamed Commander William C. McCool Elementary School.[72] The City of Palmdale, California, the birthplace of the entire shuttle fleet, changed the name of the thoroughfare Avenue M to Columbia Way. In Avondale, Arizona, the Avondale Elementary School where Michael Anderson's sister worked had sent a T-shirt with him into space. It was supposed to have an assembly when he returned from space. The school was later renamed Michael Anderson Elementary.
The first dedicated meteorological satellite launched by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) on 2 September 2002, named Metsat-1, was later renamed Kalpana-1 by Indian Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee in memory of India-born Kalpana Chawla.
In October 2004, both houses of Congress passed a resolution authored by US Representative Lucille Roybal-Allard and co-sponsored by the entire contingent of California representatives to Congress changing the name of Downey, California's Space Science Learning Center to the Columbia Memorial Space Science Learning Center. The facility is located at the former manufacturing site of the space shuttles, including Columbia and Challenger.[73]
The US Air Force's Squadron Officer School at Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama, renamed their auditorium in Husband's honor. He was a graduate of the program. The US Test Pilot School at Edwards Air Force Base in California named its pilot lounge for Husband.
NASA named a supercomputer "Columbia" in the crew's honor in 2004. It was located at the NASA Advanced Supercomputing Division at Ames Research Center on Moffett Federal Airfield near Mountain View, California. The first part of the system, built in 2003, known as "Kalpana" was dedicated to Chawla, who worked at Ames prior to joining the Space Shuttle program.[74]
A US Navy compound at a major coalition military base in Afghanistan is named Camp McCool. In addition, the athletic field at McCool's alma mater, Coronado High School in Lubbock, Texas, was renamed the Willie McCool Track and Field.
A proposed reservoir in Cherokee County in Eastern Texas is to be named Lake Columbia.[75]
Ilan Ramon High School was established in 2006 in Hod HaSharon, Israel, in tribute to the first Israeli astronaut.[76] The school's symbol shows the planet Earth with an aircraft orbiting around it.[77]
The National Naval Medical Center dedicated Laurel Clark Memorial Auditorium on July 11, 2003.[78] Gamma Phi Beta sorority, of which Clark was a member, created the Laurel Clark Foundation in her honor.[79]
PS 58 in Staten Island, New York, was named Space Shuttle Columbia School in honor of the failed mission.[80]
The Challenger Columbia Stadium in League City, Texas is named in honor of the victims of both the Columbia disaster as well as the Challenger disaster in 1986.
Columbia Colles, a range of hills on Pluto discovered by the New Horizons spacecraft in July 2015, was named in honor of the victims of the disaster.[81]
A starship on Star Trek: Enterprise was named U.S.S. Columbia in honor of the Columbia.
Effect on space programs[edit]
Following the loss of Columbia, the space shuttle program was suspended.[55] The further construction of the International Space Station (ISS) was also delayed, as the space shuttles were the only available delivery vehicle for station modules. The station was supplied using Russian unmanned Progress ships, and crews were exchanged using Russian-manned Soyuz spacecraft, and forced to operate on a skeleton crew of two.[82][83]
Less than a year after the accident, President Bush announced the Vision for Space Exploration, calling for the space shuttle fleet to complete the ISS, with retirement by the year 2010 following the completion of the ISS, to be replaced by a newly developed Crew Exploration Vehicle for travel to the Moon and Mars.[84] NASA planned to return the space shuttle to service around September 2004; that date was pushed back to July 2005.
On July 26, 2005, at 10:39 am EST, Space Shuttle Discovery cleared the tower on the "Return to Flight" mission STS-114, marking the shuttle's return to space. Overall the STS-114 flight was highly successful, but a similar piece of foam from a different portion of the tank was shed, although the debris did not strike the Orbiter. Due to this, NASA once again grounded the shuttles until the remaining problem was understood and a solution implemented.[55] After delaying their re-entry by two days due to adverse weather conditions, Commander Eileen Collins and Pilot James M. Kelly returned Discovery safely to Earth on August 9, 2005. Later that same month, the external tank construction site at Michoud was damaged by Hurricane Katrina.[85] At the time, there was concern that this would set back further shuttle flights by at least two months and possibly more.
The actual cause of the foam loss on both Columbia and Discovery was not determined until December 2005, when x-ray photographs of another tank showed that thermal expansion and contraction during filling, not human error, caused cracks that led to foam loss. NASA's Hale formally apologized to the Michoud workers who had been blamed for the loss of Columbia for almost three years.[14]
The second "Return to Flight" mission, STS-121, launched on July 4, 2006, at 2:37:55 pm (EDT), after two previous launch attempts were scrubbed because of lingering thunderstorms and high winds around the launch pad. The launch took place despite objections from its chief engineer and safety head. This mission increased the ISS crew to three. A 5-inch (130 mm) crack in the foam insulation of the external tank gave cause for concern; however, the Mission Management Team gave the go for launch.[86] Space Shuttle Discovery touched down successfully on July 17, 2006 at 9:14:43 am (EDT) on Runway 15 at the Kennedy Space Center.
On August 13, 2006, NASA announced that STS-121 had shed more foam than they had expected. While this did not delay the launch for the next mission – STS-115, originally set to lift off on August 27 [87] – the weather and other technical glitches did, with a lightning strike, Hurricane Ernesto and a faulty fuel tank sensor combining to delay the launch until September 9. On September 19, landing was delayed an extra day to examine Atlantis after objects were found floating near the shuttle in the same orbit. When no damage was detected, Atlantis landed successfully on September 21.
The Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report released by NASA on December 30, 2008, made further recommendations to improve a crew's survival chances on future space vehicles, such as the (planned) Orion spacecraft. These included improvements in crew restraints, finding ways to deal more effectively with catastrophic cabin depressurization, more "graceful degradation" of vehicles during a disaster so that crews will have a better chance at survival, and automated parachute systems.[59]
Sociocultural aftermath[edit]
Fears of terrorism[edit]
After the shuttle's breakup, there were some initial fears that terrorists might have been involved, but no evidence of that has ever surfaced.[88] Security surrounding the launch and landing of the space shuttle had been increased because the crew included the first Israeli astronaut.[89] The Merritt Island launch facility, like all sensitive government areas, had increased security after the September 11 attacks.
Purple streak image[edit]
The San Francisco Chronicle reported that an amateur astronomer had taken a five-second exposure that appeared to show "a purplish line near the shuttle", resembling lightning, during re-entry.[90] The CAIB report concluded that the image was the result of "camera vibrations during a long-exposure".[91]
2003 Armageddon film hoax[edit]
In response to the disaster, FX canceled its scheduled airing two nights later of the 1998 film Armageddon, in which the space shuttle Atlantis is depicted as being destroyed by asteroid fragments.[92] In a hoax inspired by the destruction of Columbia, some images that were purported to be satellite photographs of the shuttle's "explosion" turned out to be screen captures from the space shuttle destruction scene of Armageddon.
Music[edit]
The 2003 album Bananas by Deep Purple includes "Contact Lost", an instrumental piece written by guitarist Steve Morse in remembrance of the loss. Morse is donating his songwriting royalties to the families of the astronauts.[93]
Catherine Faber and Callie Hills (the folk group known as Echo's Children) included a memorial song titled Columbia on their 2004 album From the Hazel Tree. [94]
The 2005 album Ultimatum – EP by The Long Winters contains the song "The Commander Thinks Aloud", which was songwriter/singer John Roderick's musing on the crew's perspective of the unexpected catastrophe.[95] In addition, the January 30, 2015 episode of Hrishikesh Hirway's Song Exploder podcast presented an interview with John Roderick about the songwriting and recording process for "The Commander Thinks Aloud".[96]
Swiss post-rock band The Evpatoria Report used the records of radio communication between Columbia and CAPCOM as a sample for their instrumental song Taijin Kyofusho on their 2005 album Golevka.
The Hungarian composer Peter Eötvös wrote a piece named Seven for solo violin and orchestra in 2006 in memory of the crew of Columbia. Seven was premiered in 2007 by violinist Akiko Suwanai, conducted by Pierre Boulez, and it was recorded in 2012 with violinist Patricia Kopatchinskaja and the composer conducting.[97]
The 2008 album Columbia: We Dare to Dream by Anne Cabrera was written as a tribute to space shuttle Columbia STS-107, the crew, support teams, recovery teams, and the crew's families.[98] A copy of the album on compact disc was flown aboard space shuttle Discovery mission STS-131 to the International Space Station by astronaut Clayton Anderson in April 2010.[99]
The Scottish Folk-Rock band Runrig included a song entitled "Somewhere" on their album The Story (2016); the song was dedicated to Laurel Clark (who had become a fan of the band during her Navy service in Scotland), and includes a piece of her wake up song, followed by some radio chatter, at the end.[100]
See also[edit]
United States portal
Spaceflight portal
Texas portal
2000s portal
Apollo 1
Criticism of the Space Shuttle program
Engineering disasters
Expedition 6
References[edit]
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (August 2003). "6.1 A History of Foam Anomalies (page 121)" (PDF). Retrieved June 26, 2014.
Jump up ^ "Spaceflight Now | STS-119 Shuttle Report | Legendary commander tells story of shuttle's close call". spaceflightnow.com. Retrieved 2017-03-31.
Jump up ^ Marcia Dunn (February 2, 2003). "Columbia's problems began on left wing". Associated Press via staugustine.com.
Jump up ^ "Molten Aluminum found on Columbia's thermal tiles". USA Today. Associated Press. March 4, 2003. Retrieved August 13, 2007.
^ Jump up to: a b Columbia Accident Investigation Board (August 2003). "2.1 Mission Objectives and Their Rationales (page 28)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 30, 2006. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
Jump up ^ Century of Flight. "The Columbia space shuttle accident". Retrieved August 13, 2007.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (August 2003). "6.1 A History of Foam Anomalies (PDF)" (PDF). Retrieved February 26, 2013.
Jump up ^ Armando Oliu; KSC Debris Team (October 10, 2002). "STS-112 SRB POST FLIGHT/RETRIEVAL ASSESSMENT" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on July 19, 2012. Retrieved August 6, 2011.
Jump up ^ Jerry Smelser (October 31, 2002). "STS-112/ET-115 Bipod Ramp Foam Loss, Page 4" (PDF). Retrieved August 5, 2011.
Jump up ^ Cabbage, Michael & Harwood, William (2004). Comm Check. Free Press. p. 94. ISBN 0-7432-6091-0.
Jump up ^ Gehman; et al. (2003). "Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Chapter 6, "A History of Foam Anomalies", pages 125 & 148" (PDF). Retrieved 2011-08-05.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "CAIB page 153 (PDF)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on May 16, 2011. Retrieved December 17, 2010.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "CAIB Recommendation R6.3-2 (PDF)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 19, 2006. Retrieved January 30, 2006.
^ Jump up to: a b c Hale, Wayne (2012-04-18). "How We Nearly Lost Discovery". waynehale.wordpress.com. Retrieved April 18, 2012.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board, (2003) Volume 1, Chapter 6, p. 138. CAIB Report Volume 1 Part 2 Archived October 6, 2016, at the Wayback Machine.(pdf). Retrieved June 8, 2006.
Jump up ^ Hale, Wayne (2013-01-13). "After Ten Years: Working on the Wrong Problem". Wayne Hale's Blog. Archived from the original on 2017-05-30. Retrieved January 14, 2013.
Jump up ^ Bolden, Charles F. (2004-01-06). "Charles F. Bolden". NASA Johnson Space Center Oral History Project (Interview). Interview with Johnson, Sandra; Wright, Rebecca; Ross-Nazzal, Jennifer. Houston, Texas. Retrieved 6 January 2014.
Jump up ^ "nasa-global.speedera.net" (PDF). Retrieved July 27, 2007.
Jump up ^ "Email told fatal shuttle it was safe". AP/Guardian.co.uk. July 1, 2003. Retrieved March 26, 2013.
Jump up ^ Publicly released email exchange between Columbia and mission control[permanent dead link] (via Google Docs)
Jump up ^ William Harwood (June 30, 2003). "Foam strike email to shuttle commander released". CBS News/spaceflightnow.com. Retrieved March 26, 2013.
Jump up ^ Yaffa, Joshua. "The Information Sage". Washington Monthly.
Jump up ^ "Edward Tufte forum: PowerPoint Does Rocket Science—and Better Techniques for Technical Reports". www.edwardtufte.com. Retrieved 2016-08-11.
^ Jump up to: a b Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2008). "Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report" (PDF).
Jump up ^ "Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report" (PDF). NASA.gov. 2008. pp. 2–90. The 51-L Challenger accident investigation showed that the Challenger CM remained intact and the crew was able to take some immediate actions after vehicle breakup, although the loads experienced were much higher as a result of the aerodynamic loads (estimated at 16 G to 21 G).5 The Challenger crew became incapacitated quickly and could not complete activation of all breathing air systems, leading to the conclusion that an incapacitating cabin depressurization occurred. By comparison, the Columbia crew experienced lower loads (~3.5 G) at the CE. The fact that none of the crew members lowered their visors strongly suggests that the crew was incapacitated after the CE by a rapid depressurization. Although no quantitative conclusion can be made regarding the cabin depressurization rate, it is probable that the cabin depressurization rate was high enough to incapacitate the crew in a matter of seconds. Conclusion L1-5. The depressurization incapacitated the crew members so rapidly that they were not able to lower their helmet visors.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Volume I". Retrieved January 4, 2006.
Jump up ^ Harnden, Toby (2003-02-03). "Searchers stumble on human remains". Telegraph.co.uk. Retrieved 2017-09-05.
Jump up ^ https://www.nasa.gov/pdf/298870main_SP-2008-565.pdf
Jump up ^ Bush, George W. (2003). "President Addresses Nation on Space Shuttle Columbia Tragedy". The White House. Retrieved January 4, 2006.
Jump up ^ Introduction to Emergency Management, Fourth Edition, Butterworth-Heinemann, Burlington, 2010, p. 166
^ Jump up to: a b Columbia Accident Investigation Board, (2003) Volume 1, Chapter 2, p. 41.
Jump up ^ Harnden, Toby (February 3, 2003). "Searchers stumble on human remains". The Daily Telegraph. London.
Jump up ^ "In Search Of.." Retrieved February 9, 2009.
Jump up ^ Ramasamy Venugopal. "The Space Shuttle Columbia Disaster". Space Safety Magazine. Retrieved January 28, 2015.
Jump up ^ awextra@arrl.org (2003). "Hams Aid Columbia Debris Search in Western States". American Radio Relay League, Inc. Archived from the original on November 4, 2005. Retrieved February 1, 2007.
Jump up ^ Szewczyk, Nathaniel; et al. (2005). "Caenorhabditis elegans Survives Atmospheric Breakup of STS-107, Space Shuttle Columbia". Mary Ann Liebert, Astrobiology. Retrieved November 2, 2006.
Jump up ^ "Worms survived Columbia disaster". BBC News. May 1, 2003. Retrieved December 16, 2005.
Jump up ^ Worms Survive Shuttle Disaster Archived October 11, 2016, at the Wayback Machine. Fall 2003
Jump up ^ "The 'Columbia' Debris Recovery Helo Crash". Check-Six.com. Retrieved September 1, 2009.
Jump up ^ "Shuttle debris offered online". BBC News. February 3, 2003. Retrieved May 27, 2007.
Jump up ^ "Debris Amnesty Ends, 9 May Face Looting Charges". Associated Press. February 8, 2003.
Jump up ^ "Divers Find Shuttle's Front Landing Gear". Fox News. February 19, 2003. Retrieved April 25, 2010.
Jump up ^ "NASA begins packing up shuttle debris for storage". USA Today. September 10, 2003. Retrieved June 22, 2009.
Jump up ^ Fonseca, Brian (May 7, 2008). "Shuttle Columbia's hard drive data recovered from crash site". Computerworld.com. Retrieved December 9, 2016.
Jump up ^ "The Physics of Whipped Cream". Science.nasa.gov. Archived from the original on September 1, 2009. Retrieved September 1, 2009.
Jump up ^ "Space shuttle Columbia part found in East Texas". CNN. August 2, 2011. Retrieved August 2, 2011.
Jump up ^ "Shuttle Columbia's Debris on View at NASA Facility". Los Angeles Times. January 31, 2004.
Jump up ^ Glenn Mahone/Bob Jacobs (NASA Headquarters), Eileen M. Hawley (Johnson Space Center) (February 28, 2003). "NASA Releases Columbia Crew Cabin Video". NASA. Retrieved March 29, 2013.
Jump up ^ Dittemore, Ron (2003). "CNN Breaking News — NASA Briefing, Part I". CNN. Retrieved January 4, 2006.
Jump up ^ Woods, David (2004). "Creating Foresight: Lessons for Enhancing Resilience from Columbia" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on March 9, 2005. Retrieved February 1, 2005.
Jump up ^ Sparks, Scotty (2003). "Water Absorption by Foam" (PDF). NASA. Retrieved August 9, 2006.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "Board Members". Archived from the original on May 22, 2012. Retrieved May 28, 2012.
Jump up ^ NASA. "Review of Columbia's data recorder will begin this weekend". Archived from the original on March 29, 2013. Retrieved February 1, 2013.
Jump up ^ Harwood, William (19 March 2003). "Data recorder recovered; could hold key insights". Spaceflight Now. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b c Howell, Elizabeth. "Columbia Disaster: What Happened, What NASA Learned". Space. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
Jump up ^ "Materials science students prepare to analyze debris recovered from the shuttle Columbia". Lehigh University. Archived from the original on September 12, 2006. Retrieved February 1, 2013.
Jump up ^ Justin Kerr (2003). "Impact Testing of the Orbiter Thermal Protection System (PDF)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on February 19, 2006. Retrieved January 30, 2006.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Volume I, chapter 3, page 78 (PDF)" (PDF). Retrieved January 4, 2006.
^ Jump up to: a b "Layout 1" (PDF). Retrieved September 1, 2009.
Jump up ^ Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report Archived April 7, 2016, at the Wayback Machine..
Jump up ^ James Albaugh (Dec 4, 2017). "Opinion: Jim Albaugh's Lessons Of Aerospace Success". Aviation Week & Space Technology.
Jump up ^ "The audacious rescue plan that might have saved space shuttle Columbia". Ars Technica. 1 February 2016. Retrieved 27 September 2016.
^ Jump up to: a b c Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "Decision Making at NASA" (PDF). CAIB Report, Volume I, chapter 6.4 "Possibility of Rescue or Repair". p. 173ff. Retrieved March 28, 2013.
^ Jump up to: a b c d e Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "STS-107 In-Flight Options Assessment" (PDF). CAIB Report, Volume II, appendix D.13. p. 391ff. Retrieved January 30, 2006.
Jump up ^ Woodruff, Judy (February 6, 2003). "CNN LIVE EVENT/SPECIAL: Remembering the Columbia 7: Washington National Cathedral Memorial for Astronauts". CNN.com. CNN. Retrieved September 15, 2011.
Jump up ^ "Astros Honor Astronauts At Season Opener". NASA. Retrieved September 19, 2006.
Jump up ^ Babineck, Mark (2004-02-01). "Columbia Astronauts Honored at Super Bowl". The Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ "NFL honors shuttle crew in ceremony". Amarillo Globe-News. 2004-02-02. Retrieved 2017-05-21.
Jump up ^ "Congressional Space Medal of Honor". NASA History Program Office. Retrieved January 28, 2011.
Jump up ^ "Asteroids Dedicated To Space Shuttle Columbia Crew" (Press release). NASA. August 6, 2003.
"Tribute to the Crew of Columbia". Archived from the original on February 8, 2008. Retrieved November 6, 2006.
Jump up ^ Husband crater, Gazetteer of Planetary Nomenclature, International Astronomical Union Working Group for Planetary System Nomenclature
Jump up ^ "Commander William C. McCool Elementary/Middle School". Archived from the original on September 4, 2006. Retrieved February 1, 2007.
Jump up ^ Barragan, James (February 14, 2014) "Downey space museum is struggling to survive" Archived April 22, 2014, at the Wayback Machine. Los Angeles Times
Jump up ^ "NASA to Name Supercomputer After Columbia Astronaut".
Jump up ^ "The Lake Eastex Water Supply Project". Archived from the original on May 12, 2008. Retrieved January 2, 2009.
Jump up ^ "Ramon High School-Overview". Retrieved August 31, 2010.
Jump up ^ "יום הבריאות 4.02.09". Retrieved August 31, 2010.
Jump up ^ "Laurel B Clark Auditorium". Retrieved June 22, 2011.
Jump up ^ "MSU Gammas – Laurel Clark Foundation". Archived from the original on October 29, 2012. Retrieved March 11, 2012.
Jump up ^ "Welcome to PS 58". July 29, 2015.
Jump up ^ Sutherland, Paul. "Pluto team name features after Dr Who and Star Trek". Skymania. Retrieved 31 August 2015.
Jump up ^ "Russian Soyuz TMA Spacecraft". NASA. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
Jump up ^ Reichhardt, Tony (November 2003). "Backgrounder: State of the Station". Air & Space Magazine. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
Jump up ^ "President Bush offers new vision for NASA". NASA. 14 January 2004. Retrieved 1 February 2013.
Jump up ^ David, Leonard (30 August 2005). "Katrina batters NASA facility". Space.com. Retrieved 1 February 2013. [permanent dead link]
Jump up ^ Chien, Philip (June 27, 2006) "NASA wants shuttle to fly despite safety misgivings." Archived January 11, 2009, at the Wayback Machine. The Washington Times
Jump up ^ "Foam still a key concern for shuttle launch". New Scientist SPACE. Retrieved August 13, 2006.
Jump up ^ Barnett, Brooke; Reynolds, Amy (2008). Terrorism and the Press: An Uneasy Relationship. Lang, Peter Publishing, Incorporated. p. 39. ISBN 0-8204-9516-6.
Jump up ^ "Israel mourns first astronaut's death". CNN. February 1, 2003. Retrieved February 24, 2004.
Jump up ^ Russell, Sabin (May 2, 2003). "Mysterious purple streak is shown hitting Columbia 7 minutes before it disintegrated". San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved May 26, 2009.
Jump up ^ Columbia Accident Investigation Board (2003). "Report of Columbia Accident Investigation Board, Volume III, Part 2, page 88 (PDF)" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on August 25, 2006. Retrieved August 18, 2006.
Jump up ^ Sue Chan (February 3, 2003). "TV Pulls Shuttle Sensitive Material". CBS News. Retrieved September 1, 2009.
Jump up ^ "Deep Purple's Shuttle Connection". guitarsite.com. Archived from the original on February 15, 2007. Retrieved February 15, 2007.
Jump up ^ "Echo's Children CD Page".
Jump up ^ Roderick, John. "The Long Winters". Retrieved 5 February 2015.
Jump up ^ Hirway, Hrishikesh. "Song Exploder, Episode 28: The Long Winters". Retrieved 5 February 2015.
Jump up ^ Eötvös, Peter. "Seven". Peter Eötvös. Retrieved 16 Nov 2013.
Jump up ^ Cabrera, Anne. "Columbia: We Dare to Dream". Chubby Crow Records Inc. Retrieved 6 May 2012.
Jump up ^ Anderson, Clayton. "Clay Anderson with Columbia CD aboard ISS". Anderson. Retrieved 6 May 2012.
Jump up ^ "Skye rockers Runrig prepare for their final album".
This article incorporates public domain material from websites or documents of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
External links[edit]
Wikimedia Commons has media related to Space Shuttle Columbia disaster.
Wikisource has original text related to this article:
Columbia Settlement
Orbiter Wing Leading Edge Protection (upgrade proposed for 1999, but cancelled)
NASA's Space Shuttle Columbia and her crew
NASA STS-107 Crew Memorial web page
Columbia Crew Survival Investigation Report PDF
Doppler radar animation of the debris after break up
President Bush's remarks at memorial service – February 4, 2003
The CBS News Space Reporter's Handbook STS-51L/107 Supplement
The 13-min. Crew cabin video (subtitled). Ends 4-min. before the shuttle began to disintegrate.
photos of recovered debris stored on the 16th floor of the Vehicle Assembly Building at KSC
[show]
v
t
e
STS-107
Main articles
Space Shuttle Columbia
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster
Space Shuttle external tank
Space Shuttle thermal protection system
Crew
Husband (Cmdr)
McCool
Brown
Chawla
Anderson
Clark
Ramon
See also
Columbia Accident Investigation Board
SpaceHab
FREESTAR
Hitchhiker
Extended Duration Orbiter
[show]
v
t
e
Space Shuttle Columbia (OV-102)
Flights
STS-1
STS-2
STS-3
STS-4
STS-5
STS-9
STS-61-C
STS-28
STS-32
STS-35
STS-40
STS-50
STS-52
STS-55
STS-58
STS-62
STS-65
STS-73
STS-75
STS-78
STS-80
STS-83
STS-94
STS-87
STS-90
STS-93
STS-109
STS-107
Status
Out of service: destroyed 1 February 2003 (STS-107)
See also
Columbia Accident Investigation Board
STS-61-E
STS-61-H
STS-144
[show]
v
t
e
U.S. Space Shuttle missions
Completed
1970s
1977
ALT
1980s
1981
STS-1
STS-2
1982
STS-3
STS-4
STS-5
1983
STS-6
STS-7
STS-8
STS-9
1984
STS-41-B
STS-41-C
STS-41-D
STS-41-G
STS-51-A
1985
STS-51-C
STS-51-D
STS-51-B
STS-51-G
STS-51-F
STS-51-I
STS-51-J
STS-61-A
STS-61-B
1986
STS-61-C
STS-51-L
1988
STS-26
STS-27
1989
STS-29
STS-30
STS-28
STS-34
STS-33
1990s
1990
STS-32
STS-36
STS-31
STS-41
STS-38
STS-35
1991
STS-37
STS-39
STS-40
STS-43
STS-48
STS-44
1992
STS-42
STS-45
STS-49
STS-50
STS-46
STS-47
STS-52
STS-53
1993
STS-54
STS-56
STS-55
STS-57
STS-51
STS-58
STS-61
1994
STS-60
STS-62
STS-59
STS-65
STS-64
STS-68
STS-66
1995
STS-63
STS-67
STS-71
STS-70
STS-69
STS-73
STS-74
1996
STS-72
STS-75
STS-76
STS-77
STS-78
STS-79
STS-80
1997
STS-81
STS-82
STS-83
STS-84
STS-94
STS-85
STS-86
STS-87
1998
STS-89
STS-90
STS-91
STS-95
STS-88
1999
STS-96
STS-93
STS-103
2000s
2000
STS-99
STS-101
STS-106
STS-92
STS-97
2001
STS-98
STS-102
STS-100
STS-104
STS-105
STS-108
2002
STS-109
STS-110
STS-111
STS-112
STS-113
2003
STS-107
2005
STS-114
2006
STS-121
STS-115
STS-116
2007
STS-117
STS-118
STS-120
2008
STS-122
STS-123
STS-124
STS-126
2009
STS-119
STS-125
STS-127
STS-128
STS-129
2010s
2010
STS-130
STS-131
STS-132
2011
STS-133
STS-134
STS-135
Cancelled
STS-41-F
STS-61-E
STS-61-F
STS-61-G
STS-62-A
STS-61-M
STS-61-H
STS-144
STS-3xx
STS-400
Others
Orbiters
Enterprise
Columbia
disaster
Challenger
disaster
Discovery
Atlantis
Endeavour
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster&oldid=822137234"
Categories:
Space Shuttle Columbia disaster
Hidden categories:
Webarchive template wayback links
All articles with dead external links
Articles with dead external links from November 2016
Articles with permanently dead external links
Articles with dead external links from January 2018
Use mdy dates from June 2011
Pages using deprecated image syntax
All articles with failed verification
Articles with failed verification from November 2015
Wikipedia articles incorporating text from NASA
Use American English from January 2014
All Wikipedia articles written in American English
Articles containing video clips
Navigation menu
Personal tools
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Namespaces
Article
Talk
Variants
Views
Read
Edit
View history
More
Search
Navigation
Main page
Contents
Featured content
Current events
Random article
Donate to Wikipedia
Wikipedia store
Interaction
Help
About Wikipedia
Community portal
Recent changes
Contact page
Tools
What links here
Related changes
Upload file
Special pages
Permanent link
Page information
Wikidata item
Cite this page
Print/export
Create a book
Download as PDF
Printable version
In other projects
Wikimedia Commons
Languages
العربية
Català
Čeština
Eesti
Ελληνικά
Español
Euskara
Français
Galego
한국어
हिन्दी
Italiano
עברית
Magyar
മലയാളം
日本語
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
සිංහල
Simple English
Slovenčina
Slovenščina
தமிழ்
ไทย
Türkçe
Tiếng Việt
中文
Edit links
This page was last edited on 24 January 2018, at 16:31.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit organization.
Privacy policy
About Wikipedia
Disclaimers
Contact Wikipedia
Developers
Cookie statement
Mobile view
Enable previews

value: mw-page-base noprint

value: mw-head-base noprint

value: firstHeading firstHeading en

value: siteSub noprint

value: jump-to-nav mw-jump

tag: caption

attr: alt src width height srcset data-file-width data-file-height

tag: span

attr: href class title

value:
/wiki/North_American_Eastern_Time_Zone
mw-redirect
North American Eastern Time Zone

value:
/wiki/Earth%27s_atmosphere
mw-redirect
Earth's atmosphere

value:
/wiki/Roscosmos_State_Corporation
mw-redirect
Roscosmos State Corporation

value:
/wiki/Payload_Specialist
mw-redirect
Payload Specialist

value:
/wiki/Captain_(U.S._Navy)
mw-redirect
Captain (U.S. Navy)

value:
/wiki/Laurel_Blair_Salton_Clark
mw-redirect
Laurel Blair Salton Clark

value: Edit section: Debris strike during launch

value:
/wiki/Reinforced_carbon-carbon
mw-redirect
Reinforced carbon-carbon

value: Space Shuttle Challenger launch decision

value:
/wiki/Charles_F._Bolden
mw-redirect
Charles F. Bolden

value:
/wiki/Chevy_Corvette
mw-redirect
Chevy Corvette

value: Christopher C. Kraft Jr. Mission Control Center

value:
/wiki/Flight_data_recorder
mw-redirect
Flight data recorder

value:
/wiki/Dallas,_Texas
mw-redirect
Dallas, Texas

value:
/wiki/Ground_Controller
mw-redirect
Ground Controller

value: Edit section: Crew survivability aspects

value: position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 110px; right: 0px; bottom: 0px; height: 0px; width: 0px;

value: left: 50%; top: 50%; margin-left: -35px; margin-top: -27.5px;

value: mediaContainer mwPlayerContainer k-player videoHolder

value: width:220px width: 220px; position: relative;

value:
/wiki/Counties_of_Arkansas
mw-redirect
Counties of Arkansas

value:
/wiki/Emergency_services
mw-redirect
Emergency services

value:
/wiki/Cassie_Conley
mw-redirect
Cassie Conley

value:
/wiki/Online_auction_business_model
mw-redirect
Online auction business model

value: The material near this tag failed verification of its source citation(s). (November 2015)

value: File:STS-107, final moments in cabin (Space Shuttle Columbia disaster).webm

value: <video id="mwe_player_2" poster="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/20/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm/320px--STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm.jpg" controls="" preload="none" autoplay="" style="width:320px;height:240px" class="kskin" data-durationhint="470.333" data-startoffset="0" data-mwtitle="STS-107,_final_moments_in_cabin_(Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster).webm" data-mwprovider="wikimediacommons"><source src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/2/20/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm" type="video/webm; codecs="vp8, vorbis"" data-title="Original WebM file, 320 × 240 (302 kbps)" data-shorttitle="WebM source" data-width="320" data-height="240" data-bandwidth="302319" data-framerate="30"/><source src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/transcoded/2/20/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm.240p.webm" type="video/webm; codecs="vp8, vorbis"" data-title="Small WebM (240P)" data-shorttitle="WebM 240P" data-transcodekey="240p.webm" data-width="320" data-height="240" data-bandwidth="307728" data-framerate="30"/><source src="//upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/transcoded/2/20/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm/STS-107%2C_final_moments_in_cabin_%28Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster%29.webm.160p.webm" type="video/webm; codecs="vp8, vorbis"" data-title="Low bandwidth WebM (160P)" data-shorttitle="WebM 160P" data-transcodekey="160p.webm" data-width="214" data-height="160" data-bandwidth="193384" data-framerate="30"/></video>

value:
/wiki/Brittle_fracture
mw-redirect
Brittle fracture

value: Edit section: Columbia Accident Investigation Board

value:
/wiki/Harold_W._Gehman,_Jr.
mw-redirect
Harold W. Gehman, Jr.

value: Edit section: Other contributing factors

value:
/wiki/Environmental_Protection_Agency
mw-redirect
Environmental Protection Agency

value: Edit section: Possible emergency procedures

value:
/wiki/Remote_Control_Orbiter
mw-redirect
Remote Control Orbiter

value:
/wiki/Extra-vehicular_activity
mw-redirect
Extra-vehicular activity

value:
/wiki/Lyndon_B._Johnson_Space_Center
mw-redirect
Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center

value:
/wiki/Brazilian_people
mw-redirect
Brazilian people

value:
/wiki/Mount_Palomar_observatory
mw-redirect
Mount Palomar observatory

value:
/wiki/Mars_Exploration_Rover_Mission
mw-redirect
Mars Exploration Rover Mission

value: Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport

value:
/wiki/State_Route_904_(Washington)
mw-redirect
State Route 904 (Washington)

value:
/wiki/Brevard_County_School_District
mw-redirect
Brevard County School District

value:
/wiki/US_Air_Force
mw-redirect
US Air Force

value:
/wiki/National_Naval_Medical_Center
mw-redirect
National Naval Medical Center

value:
/wiki/Space_shuttle_program
mw-redirect
Space shuttle program

value:
/wiki/Progress_spacecraft
mw-redirect
Progress spacecraft

value:
/wiki/Soyuz_spacecraft
mw-redirect
Soyuz spacecraft

value:
/wiki/Orion_spacecraft
mw-redirect
Orion spacecraft

value:
/wiki/Merritt_Island
mw-redirect
Merritt Island

value:
/wiki/The_Commander_Thinks_Aloud
mw-redirect
The Commander Thinks Aloud

value:
/wiki/Peter_E%C3%B6tv%C3%B6s
mw-redirect
Peter Eötvös

value:
noprint metadata navbox
navigation
Portals
font-weight:bold;padding:0.4em 2em

value:
/wiki/Google_Docs
mw-redirect
Google Docs

value:
nofollow
external text
https://history.nasa.gov/spacemedal.htm

value:
nofollow
external text
http://www.lakeeastex.org/index.asp

value:
nofollow
external text
http://twitpic.com/1jglah

value: -moz-column-width: 30em; -webkit-column-width: 30em; column-width: 30em; list-style-type: decimal;

value: commons:Category:Space Shuttle Columbia disaster

value:
/wiki/File:STS-107_Flight_Insignia.svg
image
Seal of STS-107

value:
navbox-image
3
width:1px;padding:0px 2px 0px 0px

value:
navbox-image
3
width:1px;padding:0px 0px 0px 2px

value:
/wiki/William_Cameron_McCool
mw-redirect
William Cameron McCool

value:
/wiki/David_McDowell_Brown
mw-redirect
David McDowell Brown

value: nowraplinks collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value:
/wiki/Cancelled_Space_Shuttle_missions
mw-redirect
Cancelled Space Shuttle missions

value: Template:All U.S. Space Shuttle Missions

value: Template talk:All U.S. Space Shuttle Missions

value: nowraplinks hlist collapsible autocollapse navbox-inner

value: Category:Space Shuttle Columbia disaster

value: Category:Webarchive template wayback links

value: Category:All articles with dead external links

value: Category:Articles with dead external links from November 2016

value: Category:Articles with permanently dead external links

value: Category:Articles with dead external links from January 2018

value: Category:Pages using deprecated image syntax

value: Category:All articles with failed verification

value: Category:Articles with failed verification from November 2015

value: Category:Wikipedia articles incorporating text from NASA

value: Category:Use American English from January 2014

value: Category:All Wikipedia articles written in American English

value: Category:Articles containing video clips

value: Discussion about edits from this IP address [ctrl-alt-n]

value: A list of edits made from this IP address [ctrl-alt-y]

value: You are encouraged to create an account and log in; however, it is not mandatory

value: You're encouraged to log in; however, it's not mandatory. [ctrl-alt-o]

value:
/wiki/Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster
View the content page [ctrl-alt-c]
c

value: Discussion about the content page [ctrl-alt-t]

value: p-namespaces navigation vectorTabs p-namespaces-label

value:
p-variants
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-variants-label

value: Past revisions of this page [ctrl-alt-h]

value: p-views navigation vectorTabs p-views-label

value:
p-cactions
navigation
vectorMenu emptyPortlet
p-cactions-label

value:
mw-wiki-logo
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page

value:
/wiki/Main_Page
Visit the main page [ctrl-alt-z]
z

value: Featured content – the best of Wikipedia

value: Find background information on current events

value: portal navigation p-wikibase-otherprojects p-wikibase-otherprojects-label

value: كارثة مكوك الفضاء كولومبيا – Arabic

value: Accident del transbordador espacial Columbia – Catalan

value: Kosmosesüstik Columbia katastroof – Estonian

value: Τραγωδία του Κολούμπια – Greek

value: Accidente del transbordador espacial Columbia – Spanish

value: Columbia espazio anezkaren istripua – Basque

value: Accident de la navette spatiale Columbia – French

value: Accidente do transbordador espacial Columbia – Galician

value: 컬럼비아 우주왕복선 공중분해 사고 – Korean

value: कोलंबिया अन्तरिक्ष यान आपदा – Hindi

value: Disastro dello Space Shuttle Columbia – Italian

value: אסון מעבורת החלל קולומביה – Hebrew

value: കൊളംബിയ ബഹിരാകാശ ദുരന്തം – Malayalam

value: コロンビア号空中分解事故 – Japanese

value: Acidente do ônibus espacial Columbia – Portuguese

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-pt badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

value: Dezastrul navetei spațiale Columbia – Romanian

value: Катастрофа шаттла «Колумбия» – Russian

value: කොළොම්බියා අභ්‍යාවකාශ ෂටලයේ අනතුර – Sinhala

value: Space Shuttle Columbia disaster – Simple English

value: interlanguage-link interwiki-sk badge-Q17437796 badge-featuredarticle

value: Nesreča raketoplana Columbia – Slovenian

value: கொலம்பியா விண்வெளி ஓடம் விபத்து – Tamil

value: ภัยพิบัติกระสวยอวกาศโคลัมเบีย – Thai

value: Thảm họa Phi thuyền con thoi Columbia – Vietnamese

value: 哥伦比亚号航天飞机灾难 – Chinese

value: /static/images/wikimedia-button-1.5x.png 1.5x, /static/images/wikimedia-button-2x.png 2x

value: /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_132x47.png 1.5x, /static/images/poweredby_mediawiki_176x62.png 2x

value:
suggestions
display: none; font-size: 13px;

value: mediawiki ltr sitedir-ltr mw-hide-empty-elt ns-0 ns-subject page-Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster rootpage-Space_Shuttle_Columbia_disaster skin-vector action-view