| Year | Team | Status | Finish | W-L | PPG | PAPG | Margin | TU/G | N/G | BHrd | BPts | PPB |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Minnesota A | D2 | 5 | 5-8 | 170.4 | 213.8 | -43.4 | 7.85 | 1.31 | 102 | 1280 | 12.55 |
| 2009 | Minnesota A | 4 | 12-3 | 296.7 | 150.0 | 146.7 | 10.73 | 2.80 | 161 | 3050 | 18.94 | |
| 2010 | Minnesota A | UG | 2 | 17-2 | 352.6 | 122.6 | 230.0 | 12.79 | 2.42 | 243 | 4500 | 18.52 |
| 2011 | Minnesota A | 2 | 10-2 | 295.8 | 118.3 | 177.5 | 11.83 | 2.33 | 142 | 2270 | 15.99 | |
| 2012 | Minnesota A | 9 | 9-7 | 237.8 | 179.1 | 58.7 | 9.81 | 1.81 | 157 | 2380 | 15.16 | |
| 2013 | Minnesota A | 12 | 7-11 | 149.2 | 225.8 | -76.6 | 7.33 | 1.61 | 132 | 1510 | 11.44 | |
| 2015 | Minnesota A | 9 | 11-10 | 204.5 | 202.9 | 1.6 | 8.81 | 2.24 | 185 | 2680 | 14.49 | |
| 2016 | Minnesota A | 9 | 10-9 | 211.6 | 233.2 | -21.6 | 8.53 | 2.11 | 162 | 2600 | 16.05 | |
| 2017 | Minnesota A | 14 | 8-6 | 230.7 | 192.5 | 38.2 | 9.50 | 2.14 | 133 | 2050 | 15.41 | |
| 2018 | Minnesota A | 8 | 11-6 | 255.0 | 192.9 | 62.1 | 9.65 | 2.18 | 164 | 2880 | 17.56 | |
| 2019 | Minnesota A | 3 | 12-2 | 300.4 | 173.6 | 126.8 | 11.07 | 2.21 | 155 | 2810 | 18.13 |
ACF Nationals 2008
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Rom, Bruce, Ted (exhibition) | Win | 185 - 170 | 9 | 1 | 11.11 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Loss | 130 - 220 | 6 | 2 | 13.33 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Florida State | Win | 245 - 75 | 12 | 3 | 11.67 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Loss | 115 - 205 | 5 | 3 | 16.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Win | 355 - 55 | 14 | 1 | 15.71 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 145 - 260 | 7 | 1 | 11.43 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 8 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 150 - 310 | 7 | 0 | 11.43 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 9 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Brown A | Loss | 75 - 295 | 5 | 1 | 6.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 85 - 335 | 4 | 1 | 12.50 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Loss | 105 - 350 | 5 | 1 | 12.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Win | 245 - 145 | 12 | 1 | 10.83 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Dartmouth A | Loss | 140 - 245 | 7 | 0 | 10.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2008 | 15 (Finals) | Minnesota A | Dartmouth A | Win | 240 - 115 | 9 | 2 | 17.78 | No Packet Recorded |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 13 | 50 | 5 | 475 | 36.54 |
| 2008 | Minnesota A | Rob Carson | 13 | 32 | 2 | 310 | 23.85 |
| 2008 | Minnesota A | Gautam Kandlikar | 13 | 15 | 9 | 105 | 8.08 |
| 2008 | Minnesota A | Bernadette Spencer | 13 | 5 | 1 | 45 | 3.46 |
ACF Nationals 2009
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | UCSD A | Win | 290 - 150 | 10 | 4 | 21.00 | Brown |
| 2009 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Loss | 75 - 295 | 4 | 5 | 15.00 | Brandeis |
| 2009 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 365 - 40 | 12 | 3 | 21.67 | Chicago B + Harvard |
| 2009 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Brandeis | Win | 285 - 85 | 11 | 5 | 18.18 | VCU |
| 2009 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | South Carolina | Win | 415 - 65 | 16 | 0 | 15.94 | MIT |
| 2009 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Truman State | Win | 415 - 80 | 14 | 3 | 20.71 | Missouri State + UCSD |
| 2009 | 9 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Rutgers | Win | 355 - 70 | 13 | 3 | 18.46 | UCLA + South Carolina |
| 2009 | 10 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Win | 415 - 130 | 14 | 2 | 20.36 | Truman State + Dartmouth |
| 2009 | 11 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Win | 355 - 85 | 13 | 3 | 18.46 | Stanford |
| 2009 | 12 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Win | 315 - 175 | 11 | 5 | 20.91 | Rutgers |
| 2009 | 13 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Brown A | Loss | 165 - 360 | 6 | 3 | 20.00 | Chicago A |
| 2009 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 130 - 225 | 6 | 2 | 13.33 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2009 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Dartmouth A | Win | 340 - 160 | 11 | 2 | 21.82 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2009 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Win | 270 - 145 | 10 | 0 | 17.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2009 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Win | 260 - 185 | 10 | 2 | 17.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Minnesota A | Brendan Byrne | 15 | 73 | 18 | 640 | 42.67 |
| 2009 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 15 | 32 | 7 | 285 | 19.00 |
| 2009 | Minnesota A | Rob Carson | 15 | 29 | 7 | 255 | 17.00 |
| 2009 | Minnesota A | Gautam Kandlikar | 15 | 27 | 10 | 220 | 14.67 |
ACF Nationals 2010
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Carleton | Win | 400 - 70 | 15 | 2 | 17.33 | Chicago A |
| 2010 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Maryland B | Win | 385 - 5 | 14 | 3 | 18.57 | Chicago A |
| 2010 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Brown B | Win | 505 - 35 | 16 | 1 | 21.88 | South Carolina + CMU |
| 2010 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Win | 420 - 105 | 13 | 2 | 23.08 | Carleton + UCLA |
| 2010 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 310 - 225 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | Maryland A + Illinois B |
| 2010 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Carnegie Mellon | Win | 485 - 15 | 17 | 1 | 18.82 | Stanford |
| 2010 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Win | 325 - 110 | 13 | 5 | 16.92 | Yale + Rutgers |
| 2010 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Win | 360 - 125 | 13 | 4 | 19.23 | Michigan + Minnesota B |
| 2010 | 9 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Illinois B | Win | 380 - 60 | 14 | 4 | 18.57 | Editors |
| 2010 | 10 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | VCU A | Win | 355 - 100 | 13 | 3 | 18.46 | Harvard |
| 2010 | 12 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Win | 455 - 55 | 16 | 3 | 19.38 | Illinois A + Penn |
| 2010 | 14 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | George Mason | Win | 390 - 15 | 15 | 2 | 16.67 | Brown A |
| 2010 | 15 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Win | 365 - 210 | 12 | 1 | 20.83 | UCSD |
| 2010 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | UCSD A | Win | 250 - 125 | 10 | 2 | 16.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2010 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 170 - 200 | 6 | 4 | 21.67 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2010 | 18 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Brown A | Win | 355 - 195 | 12 | 1 | 20.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2010 | 19 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Win | 250 - 200 | 10 | 4 | 17.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2010 | 20 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Win | 315 - 220 | 13 | 1 | 14.62 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2010 | 21 (Overall Finals) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Loss | 225 - 260 | 9 | 1 | 15.56 | No Packet Recorded |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | Minnesota A | Brendan Byrne | 19 | 113 | 17 | 1045 | 55.00 |
| 2010 | Minnesota A | Rob Carson | 19 | 49 | 9 | 445 | 23.42 |
| 2010 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 19 | 41 | 4 | 390 | 20.53 |
| 2010 | Minnesota A | Gautam Kandlikar | 19 | 40 | 16 | 320 | 16.84 |
ACF Nationals 2011
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan B | Win | 335 - 90 | 13 | 3 | 16.92 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Win | 315 - 115 | 11 | 1 | 19.09 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Loss | 185 - 215 | 8 | 3 | 15.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Win | 400 - 30 | 16 | 0 | 15.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | State College A | Win | 320 - 90 | 12 | 2 | 17.50 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Illinois B | Win | 380 - -15 | 16 | 4 | 15.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 8 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Win | 320 - 95 | 14 | 2 | 13.57 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 9 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | VCU A | Win | 295 - 150 | 12 | 1 | 15.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Brown A | Loss | 170 - 305 | 7 | 6 | 18.57 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Berkeley A | Win | 245 - 100 | 10 | 3 | 16.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Win | 255 - 90 | 10 | 1 | 16.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2011 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Virginia A | Win | 330 - 155 | 13 | 2 | 16.15 | No Packet Recorded |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 12 | 50 | 7 | 465 | 38.75 |
| 2011 | Minnesota A | Rob Carson | 12 | 45 | 12 | 390 | 32.50 |
| 2011 | Minnesota A | Gautam Kandlikar | 12 | 34 | 6 | 310 | 25.83 |
| 2011 | Minnesota A | Mike Cheyne | 12 | 13 | 3 | 115 | 9.58 |
ACF Nationals 2012
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Alabama | Win | 255 - 5 | 11 | 3 | 14.55 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Loss | 195 - 230 | 8 | 1 | 15.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Yale B | Win | 380 - 115 | 16 | 2 | 14.38 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Virginia A | Loss | 170 - 345 | 7 | 0 | 14.29 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | South Carolina | Win | 335 - 80 | 13 | 1 | 16.15 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago C | Win | 360 - 40 | 15 | 2 | 14.67 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 8 (Tiebreaker) | Minnesota A | Yale B | Win | 260 - 155 | 11 | 2 | 14.55 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 9 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Ohio State | Win | 300 - 125 | 10 | 2 | 21.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Win | 340 - 210 | 12 | 0 | 18.33 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Loss | 115 - 325 | 5 | 3 | 16.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Loss | 90 - 355 | 5 | 2 | 10.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 215 - 180 | 8 | 1 | 17.50 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Loss | 180 - 210 | 8 | 2 | 13.75 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Loss | 165 - 185 | 9 | 3 | 10.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Loss | 175 - 215 | 9 | 5 | 12.22 | No Packet Recorded |
| 2012 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Win | 270 - 90 | 10 | 0 | 17.00 | No Packet Recorded |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 16 | 89 | 15 | 815 | 50.94 |
| 2012 | Minnesota A | Mike Cheyne | 16 | 38 | 6 | 350 | 21.88 |
| 2012 | Minnesota A | Robin Heinonen | 16 | 15 | 3 | 135 | 8.44 |
| 2012 | Minnesota A | Gaurav Kandlikar | 16 | 15 | 5 | 125 | 7.81 |
ACF Nationals 2013
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Alabama | Win | 145 - 135 | 6 | 1 | 15.00 | VCU + Michigan |
| 2013 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Loss | 105 - 245 | 6 | 3 | 10.00 | Illinois A + Carleton |
| 2013 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago D | Win | 230 - 50 | 13 | 2 | 8.46 | Mich St + Ottawa + SCAR |
| 2013 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Loss | 70 - 370 | 3 | 2 | 16.67 | Rutgers + Columbia |
| 2013 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | South Carolina | Win | 275 - 0 | 15 | 1 | 8.67 | London + WUSTL |
| 2013 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Hunter College | Win | 305 - 30 | 13 | 1 | 13.85 | Chicago A + Maryland + Penn B |
| 2013 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | NYU | Win | 220 - 195 | 9 | 0 | 14.44 | Berkeley + Rice |
| 2013 | 9 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Loss | 175 - 205 | 7 | 1 | 15.71 | Penn A + Harvard + Stanford |
| 2013 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Loss | 30 - 460 | 2 | 2 | 10.00 | Yale + Virginia + Ohio St |
| 2013 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Virginia A | Loss | 45 - 500 | 2 | 1 | 15.00 | Alb + Dart + GT + NYU + NU |
| 2013 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 80 - 330 | 5 | 3 | 9.00 | Cheyne + Gupta + Carson |
| 2013 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Georgia Tech | Loss | 165 - 225 | 8 | 3 | 12.50 | Editors 1 |
| 2013 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Alberta | Win | 195 - 190 | 8 | 1 | 15.00 | Editors 2 |
| 2013 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Loss | 70 - 325 | 5 | 2 | 6.00 | Editors 3 |
| 2013 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 170 - 210 | 8 | 2 | 12.50 | Editors 4 |
| 2013 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Loss | 120 - 240 | 7 | 0 | 7.14 | Editors 5 |
| 2013 | 18 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Loss | 105 - 255 | 6 | 2 | 9.17 | Editors 6 |
| 2013 | 19 (Tiebreaker) | Minnesota A | Alabama | Win | 180 - 100 | 9 | 2 | 11.11 | Editors 7 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 | Minnesota A | Andrew Hart | 18 | 132 | 29 | 1175 | 65.28 |
ACF Nationals 2015
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 130 - 365 | 5 | 2 | 18.00 | MIT A + Alberta |
| 2015 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | McMaster A | Win | 300 - 55 | 13 | 2 | 13.85 | Chicago A |
| 2015 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Loss | 115 - 285 | 5 | 3 | 16.00 | Virginia and Yale |
| 2015 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT B | Loss | 220 - 240 | 10 | 2 | 13.00 | Rice + Illinois + W+M |
| 2015 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Rice | Win | 355 - 35 | 13 | 1 | 17.69 | Michigan + Toronto |
| 2015 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | RIT | Win | 225 - 15 | 10 | 1 | 13.00 | Stanford B + Columbia |
| 2015 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Notre Dame A | Win | 215 - 150 | 9 | 3 | 15.56 | Maryland + NYU |
| 2015 | 9 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Rutgers | Win | 225 - 80 | 12 | 3 | 10.00 | McGill + WUSTL |
| 2015 | 10 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Penn B | Win | 280 - 125 | 11 | 4 | 17.27 | Stanford A |
| 2015 | 11 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Northwestern | Win | 165 - 160 | 9 | 5 | 11.11 | Ottawa + Harvard |
| 2015 | 12 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Alberta | Win | 235 - 145 | 11 | 3 | 12.73 | UCSD A |
| 2015 | 13 (Tiebreaker) | Minnesota A | Alberta | Win | 370 - 145 | 13 | 2 | 19.23 | Penn A |
| 2015 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Loss | 90 - 460 | 4 | 2 | 15.00 | Editors 1 |
| 2015 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 220 - 330 | 9 | 0 | 14.44 | Editors 2 |
| 2015 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Virginia A | Loss | 65 - 520 | 3 | 3 | 16.67 | Editors 3 |
| 2015 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Win | 200 - 140 | 9 | 2 | 13.33 | Dartmouth |
| 2015 | 18 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Loss | 165 - 210 | 7 | 1 | 14.29 | Editors 4 |
| 2015 | 19 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Stanford B | Win | 215 - 135 | 9 | 3 | 15.56 | Editors 5 |
| 2015 | 20 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Loss | 190 - 205 | 8 | 2 | 15.00 | Penn B + Penn C + Kenyon |
| 2015 | 21 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | UCSD A | Loss | 210 - 240 | 9 | 0 | 13.33 | VCU and Berkeley |
| 2015 | 22 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Loss | 105 - 220 | 6 | 3 | 10.00 | Editors 6 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Minnesota A | Shan Kothari | 21 | 94 | 19 | 845 | 40.24 |
| 2015 | Minnesota A | Jason Asher | 21 | 60 | 21 | 495 | 23.57 |
| 2015 | Minnesota A | Peter Estall | 21 | 19 | 3 | 175 | 8.33 |
| 2015 | Minnesota A | Sam Levin | 21 | 12 | 4 | 100 | 4.76 |
ACF Nationals 2016
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago C | Loss | 70 - 260 | 3 | 4 | 20.00 | Georgia Tech |
| 2016 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | William and Mary | Win | 325 - 130 | 11 | 1 | 20.00 | Michigan B + Chicago C + Illinois |
| 2016 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Harvard A | Win | 285 - 150 | 10 | 1 | 19.00 | MIT B + Stanford B |
| 2016 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Berkeley A | Win | 265 - 230 | 10 | 1 | 17.00 | Stanford A + Louisville |
| 2016 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Columbia B | Win | 260 - 135 | 11 | 2 | 14.55 | Maryland A + McGill |
| 2016 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Northwestern | Win | 275 - 155 | 11 | 3 | 16.36 | WUSTL + Virginia |
| 2016 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Loss | 60 - 560 | 3 | 2 | 13.33 | Dartmouth + Chicago B |
| 2016 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 335 - 50 | 13 | 3 | 16.92 | Columbia A + Columbia B |
| 2016 | 10 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | New College of Florida | Win | 350 - 15 | 14 | 4 | 16.43 | Michigan A |
| 2016 | 11 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | UCSD A | Win | 215 - 100 | 9 | 1 | 14.44 | Berkeley A |
| 2016 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Loss | 205 - 215 | 9 | 1 | 13.33 | Editors 1 |
| 2016 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Loss | 205 - 325 | 9 | 3 | 14.44 | Editors 2 |
| 2016 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Loss | 140 - 380 | 6 | 2 | 15.00 | VCU + Virginia + Oxford |
| 2016 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 20 - 495 | 2 | 4 | 10.00 | Editors 3 |
| 2016 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 150 - 340 | 6 | 0 | 15.00 | Editors 4 |
| 2016 | 18 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Loss | 190 - 310 | 7 | 2 | 18.57 | Editors 5 |
| 2016 | 19 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Oxford A | Loss | 180 - 250 | 8 | 4 | 15.00 | Penn + Oklahoma |
| 2016 | 20 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Louisville | Win | 235 - 195 | 9 | 1 | 16.67 | Editors 6 |
| 2016 | 21 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Illinois A | Win | 255 - 135 | 11 | 1 | 13.64 | Editors 7 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Minnesota A | Shan Kothari | 19 | 78 | 8 | 740 | 38.95 |
| 2016 | Minnesota A | Sam Bailey | 19 | 43 | 10 | 380 | 20.00 |
| 2016 | Minnesota A | Jason Asher | 19 | 32 | 14 | 250 | 13.16 |
| 2016 | Minnesota A | Sam Levin | 19 | 9 | 8 | 50 | 2.63 |
ACF Nationals 2017
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Win | 230 - 175 | 10 | 2 | 14.00 | Berkeley A + Tennessee |
| 2017 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Duke | Loss | 175 - 180 | 8 | 3 | 13.75 | Chicago A + JHU |
| 2017 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Michigan A | Loss | 120 - 335 | 5 | 4 | 18.00 | Ohio St + Cambridge + Oxford B |
| 2017 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Oxford A | Loss | 255 - 320 | 9 | 1 | 18.89 | Stanford + Harvard |
| 2017 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | NYU | Win | 285 - 185 | 12 | 1 | 14.17 | WUSTL + UVA + Toronto + Penn |
| 2017 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Amherst | Win | 280 - 95 | 13 | 2 | 12.31 | Maryland |
| 2017 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Oxford B | Win | 310 - 130 | 12 | 2 | 16.67 | Editors 1 |
| 2017 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Rutgers | Win | 310 - 80 | 13 | 0 | 13.85 | Editors 2 |
| 2017 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago C | Win | 190 - 175 | 8 | 2 | 15.00 | Editors 3 |
| 2017 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Northwestern | Loss | 165 - 265 | 7 | 3 | 15.71 | Editors 4 |
| 2017 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Princeton | Win | 275 - 175 | 11 | 3 | 16.36 | Editors 5 |
| 2017 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Toronto A | Loss | 220 - 230 | 8 | 4 | 20.00 | Editors 6 |
| 2017 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | WUSTL | Loss | 235 - 245 | 9 | 1 | 16.67 | Editors 7 |
| 2017 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Win | 180 - 105 | 8 | 2 | 13.75 | Editors 8 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Minnesota A | Shan Kothari | 14 | 62 | 11 | 565 | 40.36 |
| 2017 | Minnesota A | Sam Bailey | 14 | 43 | 12 | 370 | 26.43 |
| 2017 | Minnesota A | Jason Asher | 14 | 18 | 6 | 150 | 10.71 |
| 2017 | Minnesota A | Peter Estall | 14 | 10 | 1 | 95 | 6.79 |
ACF Nationals 2018
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Caltech A | Win | 350 - 85 | 12 | 2 | 20.00 | Oxford + Duke |
| 2018 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Win | 305 - 165 | 11 | 1 | 18.18 | Michigan A |
| 2018 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Chicago D | Win | 375 - 40 | 14 | 1 | 17.14 | Maryland A |
| 2018 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | UCSD A | Win | 300 - 75 | 11 | 2 | 18.18 | Oklahoma + Michigan B |
| 2018 | 6 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | NYU | Win | 360 - 70 | 14 | 2 | 16.43 | JHU A + Florida |
| 2018 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Loss | 175 - 300 | 7 | 3 | 17.14 | NYU + JHU B |
| 2018 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Oklahoma | Win | 330 - 140 | 12 | 2 | 18.33 | Virginia A |
| 2018 | 9 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Northwestern | Win | 350 - 135 | 12 | 2 | 20.00 | Editors 1 |
| 2018 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 135 - 380 | 6 | 3 | 15.00 | Editors 2 |
| 2018 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Yale A | Loss | 125 - 365 | 6 | 3 | 13.33 | Editors 3 |
| 2018 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 240 - 155 | 9 | 2 | 17.78 | Editors 4 |
| 2018 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Ohio State | Loss | 150 - 225 | 6 | 2 | 16.67 | Editors 5 |
| 2018 | 14 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Berkeley A | Loss | 215 - 300 | 9 | 3 | 15.56 | Editors 6 |
| 2018 | 15 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Win | 235 - 220 | 8 | 1 | 20.00 | Editors 7 |
| 2018 | 16 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago B | Win | 250 - 205 | 9 | 4 | 20.00 | Editors 8 |
| 2018 | 17 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Berkeley B | Win | 285 - 135 | 11 | 1 | 16.36 | Editors 9 |
| 2018 | 18 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Cambridge | Loss | 155 - 285 | 7 | 3 | 14.29 | Editors 10 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Minnesota A | Shan Kothari | 17 | 72 | 19 | 625 | 36.76 |
| 2018 | Minnesota A | Sam Bailey | 17 | 40 | 7 | 365 | 21.47 |
| 2018 | Minnesota A | Jason Asher | 17 | 38 | 10 | 330 | 19.41 |
| 2018 | Minnesota A | John Waldron | 17 | 14 | 1 | 135 | 7.94 |
ACF Nationals 2019
| Year | Round | Team | Opponent | Result | Score | 10 | -5 | PPB | Packet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | MIT A | Win | 445 - 45 | 15 | 1 | 20.00 | Yale A + Michigan |
| 2019 | 2 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Toronto A | Win | 355 - 150 | 13 | 1 | 17.69 | UVA + Rutgers + Chicago B |
| 2019 | 3 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Auburn | Win | 335 - 35 | 13 | 3 | 16.92 | McGill + UCLA + Oxford |
| 2019 | 4 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Illinois B | Win | 310 - 130 | 13 | 2 | 14.62 | Berkeley A + Ohio St |
| 2019 | 5 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Maryland B | Win | 215 - 160 | 9 | 3 | 15.56 | Chicago A + Penn St |
| 2019 | 7 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Berkeley A | Win | 330 - 265 | 11 | 2 | 20.91 | Florida A + Michigan St |
| 2019 | 8 (Prelims) | Minnesota A | Harvard B | Win | 260 - 125 | 12 | 2 | 12.50 | Illinois A + Wright St |
| 2019 | 10 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Penn A | Win | 515 - 70 | 17 | 1 | 20.59 | Editors 1 |
| 2019 | 11 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Stanford A | Win | 240 - 170 | 9 | 4 | 18.89 | Editors 2 |
| 2019 | 12 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Ohio State | Win | 260 - 170 | 9 | 4 | 21.11 | Editors 3 |
| 2019 | 13 (Playoffs) | Minnesota A | Columbia A | Win | 295 - 285 | 9 | 1 | 23.33 | Editors 4 |
| 2019 | 15 (Superplayoffs) | Minnesota A | Michigan State | Win | 235 - 220 | 9 | 1 | 16.67 | Editors 6 |
| 2019 | 16 (Superplayoffs) | Minnesota A | Maryland A | Loss | 220 - 280 | 9 | 2 | 15.56 | Editors 7 |
| 2019 | 17 (Superplayoffs) | Minnesota A | Chicago A | Loss | 190 - 325 | 7 | 4 | 20.00 | Editors 8 |
| Year | Team | Player | Games | Tossups | Negs | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Minnesota A | Shan Kothari | 14 | 64 | 15 | 565 | 40.36 |
| 2019 | Minnesota A | Sam Bailey | 14 | 38 | 3 | 365 | 26.07 |
| 2019 | Minnesota A | Geoffrey Chen | 14 | 36 | 12 | 300 | 21.43 |
| 2019 | Minnesota A | Evan Brown | 14 | 17 | 1 | 165 | 11.79 |


{% extends "account/__l_base.html" %} {% load crispy_forms_tags %} {% load i18n %} {% block title %}{% trans "Password reset" %} - {{ block.super }}{% endblock %} {% block content %}
{% trans "The password link was invalid, possible because it has already been used." %}
{% endif %}


the client api will be overridden by the value of the visible property ONLY if the value of visible is true first. (otherwise, the script won't update from the server. so in this test, if you open the popup from the client you need to set visible to true first with the first link and then make it false (this is a result of the domdiff wiping out the script tag to update the component. if it's already false, and you set it false, then no change so it doesn't get written to be invoked.
Open client popup


../src/lowrisc_ibex_ibex_core_0.1/rtl/ibex_wb_stage.sv Cov: 72.9%
1: // Copyright lowRISC contributors.
2: // Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0, see LICENSE for details.
3: // SPDX-License-Identifier: Apache-2.0
4:
5: /**
6: * Writeback Stage
7: *
8: * Writeback is an optional third pipeline stage. It writes data back to the register file that was
9: * produced in the ID/EX stage or awaits a response to a load/store (LSU writes direct to register
10: * file for load data). If the writeback stage is not present (WritebackStage == 0) this acts as
11: * a simple passthrough to write data direct to the register file.
12: */
13:
14: `include "prim_assert.sv"
15:
16: module ibex_wb_stage #(
17: parameter bit WritebackStage = 1'b0
18: ) (
19: input logic clk_i,
20: input logic rst_ni,
21:
22: input logic en_wb_i,
23: input ibex_pkg::wb_instr_type_e instr_type_wb_i,
24: input logic [31:0] pc_id_i,
25:
26: output logic ready_wb_o,
27: output logic rf_write_wb_o,
28: output logic outstanding_load_wb_o,
29: output logic outstanding_store_wb_o,
30: output logic [31:0] pc_wb_o,
31:
32: input logic [4:0] rf_waddr_id_i,
33: input logic [31:0] rf_wdata_id_i,
34: input logic rf_we_id_i,
35:
36: input logic [31:0] rf_wdata_lsu_i,
37: input logic rf_we_lsu_i,
38:
39: output logic [31:0] rf_wdata_fwd_wb_o,
40:
41: output logic [4:0] rf_waddr_wb_o,
42: output logic [31:0] rf_wdata_wb_o,
43: output logic rf_we_wb_o,
44:
45: input logic lsu_resp_valid_i,
46:
47: output logic instr_done_wb_o
48: );
49:
50: import ibex_pkg::*;
51:
52: // 0 == RF write from ID
53: // 1 == RF write from LSU
54: logic [31:0] rf_wdata_wb_mux [2];
55: logic [1:0] rf_wdata_wb_mux_we;
56:
57: if(WritebackStage) begin : g_writeback_stage
58: logic [31:0] rf_wdata_wb_q;
59: logic rf_we_wb_q;
60: logic [4:0] rf_waddr_wb_q;
61:
62: logic wb_done;
63:
64: logic wb_valid_q;
65: logic [31:0] wb_pc_q;
66: wb_instr_type_e wb_instr_type_q;
67:
68: logic wb_valid_d;
69:
70: // Stage becomes valid if an instruction enters for ID/EX and valid is cleared when instruction
71: // is done
72: assign wb_valid_d = (en_wb_i & ready_wb_o) | (wb_valid_q & ~wb_done);
73:
74: // Writeback for non load/store instructions always completes in a cycle (so instantly done)
75: // Writeback for load/store must wait for response to be received by the LSU
76: // Signal only relevant if wb_valid_q set
77: assign wb_done = (wb_instr_type_q == WB_INSTR_OTHER) | lsu_resp_valid_i;
78:
79: always_ff @(posedge clk_i or negedge rst_ni) begin
80: if(~rst_ni) begin
81: wb_valid_q <= 1'b0;
82: end else begin
83: wb_valid_q <= wb_valid_d;
84: end
85: end
86:
87: always_ff @(posedge clk_i) begin
88: if(en_wb_i) begin
89: rf_we_wb_q <= rf_we_id_i;
90: rf_waddr_wb_q <= rf_waddr_id_i;
91: rf_wdata_wb_q <= rf_wdata_id_i;
92: wb_instr_type_q <= instr_type_wb_i;
93: wb_pc_q <= pc_id_i;
94: end
95: end
96:
97: assign rf_waddr_wb_o = rf_waddr_wb_q;
98: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux[0] = rf_wdata_wb_q;
99: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux_we[0] = rf_we_wb_q & wb_valid_q;
100:
101: assign ready_wb_o = ~wb_valid_q | wb_done;
102:
103: // Instruction in writeback will be writing to register file if either rf_we is set or writeback
104: // is awaiting load data. This is used for determining RF read hazards in ID/EX
105: assign rf_write_wb_o = wb_valid_q & (rf_we_wb_q | (wb_instr_type_q == WB_INSTR_LOAD));
106:
107: assign outstanding_load_wb_o = wb_valid_q & (wb_instr_type_q == WB_INSTR_LOAD);
108: assign outstanding_store_wb_o = wb_valid_q & (wb_instr_type_q == WB_INSTR_STORE);
109:
110: assign pc_wb_o = wb_pc_q;
111:
112: assign instr_done_wb_o = wb_valid_q & wb_done;
113:
114: // Forward data that will be written to the RF back to ID to resolve data hazards. The flopped
115: // rf_wdata_wb_q is used rather than rf_wdata_wb_o as the latter includes read data from memory
116: // that returns too late to be used on the forwarding path.
117: assign rf_wdata_fwd_wb_o = rf_wdata_wb_q;
118: end else begin : g_bypass_wb
119: // without writeback stage just pass through register write signals
120: assign rf_waddr_wb_o = rf_waddr_id_i;
121: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux[0] = rf_wdata_id_i;
122: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux_we[0] = rf_we_id_i;
123:
124: // ready needs to be constant 1 without writeback stage (otherwise ID/EX stage will stall)
125: assign ready_wb_o = 1'b1;
126:
127: // Unused Writeback stage only IO & wiring
128: // Assign inputs and internal wiring to unused signals to satisfy lint checks
129: // Tie-off outputs to constant values
130: logic unused_clk;
131: logic unused_rst;
132: logic unused_en_wb;
133: wb_instr_type_e unused_instr_type_wb;
134: logic [31:0] unused_pc_id;
135: logic unused_lsu_resp_valid;
136:
137: assign unused_clk = clk_i;
138: assign unused_rst = rst_ni;
139: assign unused_en_wb = en_wb_i;
140: assign unused_instr_type_wb = instr_type_wb_i;
141: assign unused_pc_id = pc_id_i;
142: assign unused_lsu_resp_valid = lsu_resp_valid_i;
143:
144: assign outstanding_load_wb_o = 1'b0;
145: assign outstanding_store_wb_o = 1'b0;
146: assign pc_wb_o = '0;
147: assign rf_write_wb_o = 1'b0;
148: assign rf_wdata_fwd_wb_o = 32'b0;
149: assign instr_done_wb_o = 1'b0;
150: end
151:
152: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux[1] = rf_wdata_lsu_i;
153: assign rf_wdata_wb_mux_we[1] = rf_we_lsu_i;
154:
155: // RF write data can come from ID results (all RF writes that aren't because of loads will come
156: // from here) or the LSU (RF writes for load data)
157: assign rf_wdata_wb_o = rf_wdata_wb_mux_we[0] ? rf_wdata_wb_mux[0] : rf_wdata_wb_mux[1];
158: assign rf_we_wb_o = |rf_wdata_wb_mux_we;
159:
160: `ASSERT(RFWriteFromOneSourceOnly, $onehot0(rf_wdata_wb_mux_we))
161: endmodule
162:


I know, a 'bot' might sound complicated, but it's not. BlingChat is a chat-based service that sits on top of Facebook Messenger and gives you engagement rings' inspiration and education. Click below to move to Facebook Messenger and start chatting with it as if you are chatting with a friend (well, a bot-friend).
Five years ago my creator founded (and still own) a crowdfunding platform. He personally consulted and guided more than 4,000 crowdfunders. During the years he collected stats, data and experience that enabled him to build a marketing plan which will significantly improve your chances to get funded. With that knowledge passed on to me, I'm proud to be the first chat-based crowdfunding consultant. I will give you simple daily marketing tasks that will improve your chances to get funded


Dive, dive, dive!!
Woke up this morning to brekkie in bed, courtesy of my sister. I reckon she was just nervous about doing the 12,000ft sky dive today. That's 50 seconds of freefall. She said I could have the stereo if she didn't make it.
But she did! Just got back, had a great time, wants to do a course! Sounds wicked! Think I'll give it a miss, though. Haven't got any brown trousers with me!
Back to the main page


|
||||||||||
| PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |
java.lang.Object edu.cmu.sphinx.linguist.language.grammar.GrammarNode
Represents a grammar node in a grammar. A grammar
is
represented as a graph of grammar nodes and arcs
.
A grammar node usually represents a word or words, but it can also be
a transition point or simply silence.
Note that all probabilties are maintained in the LogMath log base
| Constructor Summary | |
GrammarNode(int id,
Word[][] alternatives)
Creates a GrammarNode with the given ID, Words. |
| Method Summary | |
void |
add(GrammarNode node,
float logProbability)
Adds an arc to the given node |
void |
dump()
Dumps the grammar |
void |
dumpGDL(java.lang.String path)
Dumps the grammar in GDL form |
Word[][] |
getAlternatives()
Retrieves the words associated with this grammar node |
int |
getID()
Returns the ID of this GrammarNode. |
int |
getNumAlternatives()
Gets the number of alternatives |
GrammarArc[] |
getSuccessors()
Retrieves the set of transitions out of this node |
Word |
getWord()
Retrieve the single word associated with this grammar |
Word[] |
getWords(int alternative)
Retrieves the words associated with a specific alternative |
boolean |
isEmpty()
Determines if this grammar node is empty (that is, has no words). |
boolean |
isFinalNode()
Determines if this grammar node is a final node in the grammar |
void |
setFinalNode(boolean isFinal)
Sets the 'final' state of the grammar node. |
java.lang.String |
toString()
Returns the string representation of this object |
| Methods inherited from class java.lang.Object |
equals, getClass, hashCode, notify, notifyAll, wait, wait, wait |
| Constructor Detail |
public GrammarNode(int id, Word[][] alternatives)
id
- the identity of this GrammarNodealternatives
- the set of Words in this GrammarNode. This
is a two dimensional array, the first index corresponds to the
set of alternative choices, the second index corresponds to a
particular word for the alternative| Method Detail |
public int getID()
public Word[][] getAlternatives()
public Word[] getWords(int alternative)
alternative
- the index of the alternative
public Word getWord()
public int getNumAlternatives()
public boolean isEmpty()
true
if the node is empty, otherwise
false
.public GrammarArc[] getSuccessors()
public boolean isFinalNode()
public void setFinalNode(boolean isFinal)
isFinal
- if true
the grammar node is a final
node.public void add(GrammarNode node, float logProbability)
node
- the node that this new arc goes tologProbability
- the log probability of the transition occuringpublic java.lang.String toString()
public void dumpGDL(java.lang.String path)
path
- the path to write the gdl file topublic void dump()
|
||||||||||
| PREV CLASS NEXT CLASS | FRAMES NO FRAMES | |||||||||
| SUMMARY: NESTED | FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD | DETAIL: FIELD | CONSTR | METHOD |


{% extends "base.html" %} {% load static %} {% block title %} People {% endblock %} {% block body_class %}about{% endblock %} {% block header %} {{ block.super }} {% endblock %} {% block content %}
U.S.A. v. Pohl et al.
In NMT Case 4, U.S.A. v. Pohl et al., Oswald Pohl and seventeen other officials of the SS Economic and Administrative Main Office (Wirtschafts und Verwaltungshauptant, WVHA) were charged with conspiracy to commit war crimes and crimes against humanity, war crimes, crimes against humanity, and membership in a criminal organization. The crimes occurred in the concentration camps and labor camps of the SS in Germany and the occupied territories, which the WVHA managed from 1942 to 1945. According to the prosecution, approximately 10,000,000 persons were imprisoned in these camps. Specific charges included: imprisonment of civilians, nationals of foreign countries, and prisoners of war; exploitation of inmates as laborers; medical experiments conducted on prisoners; extermination of the Jews; sterilization; mistreatment of prisoners of war; euthanasia; and deportation of foreign nationals and plundering of their property. (These charges reflected two different forces in the SS system, which sometimes overlapped and sometimes competed against each other: The program of generating revenue for the SS by exploiting captive labor for profit, and the program of punishing and exterminating those considered enemies of the Nazi state.) Pohl was the chief of the WVHA, with August Frank and Georg Loerner as deputies. The other defendants were officials in the Amtsgruppen and Aemter (office groups and offices) responsible for specific aspects of the concentration camps and related operations of the SS. A few defendants were also charged with responsibility for crimes allegedly committed by their military units while they were on active military duty.
Robert M. Toms, presiding (Third Judicial Circuit, Detroit,
Michigan)
Fitzroy D. Phillips (Superior Court, 13th District, North
Carolina)
Michael A. Musmanno (Court of Common Pleas, Allegheny County,
Pennsylvania)
John J. Speight, alternate (attorney, Alabama)
Telford Taylor, Chief of Counsel for War Crimes
James M. McHaney, chief, SS division
Jack W. Robbins, chief prosecutor for Case 4
Hans Froelich, prosecutor
Baucum Fulkerson, prosecutor
William I. Hart, prosecutor
James R. Higgins, prosecutor
Julius I. Rudolph, Jr., prosecutor
Daniel J. Shiller, deputy director, SS division
Peter W. Walton, prosecutor
Erik Ortmann, interrogator
Kurt Ponger, interrogator
Paul Siebenschein, research and analysis
Howell Webb, research and analysis
Larry Wolff, interrogator
Hans Wolffsohn, research and analysis
Frank Young, research and analysis
Hans Hienrich Baier, executive officer of Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS
Oberfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Prison term: 10 years,
commuted to time served (1951).
Dr. Hans Bobermin, Chief of Office 2 of Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS
Obersturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Prison term: 20
years, reduced to 15 years.
Franz Eirenschmalz, Chief of Office 6 of Amtsgruppe C, WVHA, SS
Standartenfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Death penalty;
commuted to 9 years.
Heinz Karl Fanslau, Chief of Amtsgruppe A, WVHA, SS
Brigadefuehrer, Waffen SS. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Prison term:
25 years, reduced to 20 years, commuted to 15 years.
August Frank, Deputy Chief of WVHA, Chief of Amtsgruppe A, WVHA,
SS Obergruppen- fuehrer, Waffen SS. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Life
in prison, commuted to 15 years.
Dr. Hans Hohberg, auditor for executive office of Amtsgruppe W,
WVHA. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2 and 3. Prison term: 10 years, commuted to
time served (1951).
Max Kiefer, Deputy chief of Amtsgruppe C, Chief of Office 2 of
Amtsgruppe C, WVHA, SS Obersturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2,
3, 4. Prison term: life in prison, reduced to 20 years, commuted to time
served (1951).
Horst Klein, Chief of Office 8 of Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS
Obersturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Acquitted on counts 2, 3, 4.
Georg Loerner, Deputy Chief of WVHA, Chief of Amtsgruppe B,
WVHA, SS Gruppenfuehrer, Waffen SS. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4.
Death penalty, reduced to life in prison, commuted to 15 years.
Hans Loerner, Chief of Office 1 of Amtsgruppe A, WVHA, SS
Oberfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Prison term: 10 years,
commuted to time served (1951).
Karl Mummenthey, Chief of Office 1 of Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS
Obersturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Life in prison,
commuted to 20 years.
Oswald Pohl, Chief of WVHA and Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS
Obergruppenfuehrer, Waffen SS. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Death
penalty.
Dr. Hermann Pook, Office 3 (chief dentist) of Amtsgruppe D,
WVHA, Waffen SS Obersturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4.
Prison term: 10 years, commuted to time served (1951).
Rudolf Scheide, Chief of Office 5 of Amtsgruppe B, WVHA, SS
Standartenfuehrer. Verdict: Acquitted on counts 2, 3, 4.
Karl Sommer, Deputy Chief of Office 2 of Amtsgruppe D, WVHA, SS
Sturmbannfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on counts 2, 3, 4. Death penalty,
commuted to life in prison, then reduced to 20 years.
Erwin Tschentscher, Deputy Chief of Amtsgruppe B, Chief of
Office 1 of Amtsgruppe B, WVHA, SS Standartenfuehrer. Verdict: Guilty on
counts 2, 3, 4. Prison term: 10 years, commuted to time served (1951).
Josef Vogt, Chief of Office 4 of Amtsgruppe A, WVHA, SS
Standartenfuehrer. Verdict: Acquitted on counts 2, 3, 4.
Dr. Leo Volk, adviser to Pohl, head of legal section in
executive office of Amtsgruppe W, WVHA, SS Hauptsturmfuehrer. Verdict:
Guilty on counts 2 and 3; acquitted on count 4. Prison term: 10 years,
commuted to 8 years.
Baier: Dr. Stefan Fritsch and Dr. Georg Menzel; Menzel and Dr.
Oskar von Jagwitz
Bobermin: Dr. Hans Gawlik and Dr. Gerhard Klinnert
Eirenschmalz: Dr. Bolko von Stein and Dr. Oskar von Jagwitz; Dr.
Robert Servatius
Fanslau: Dr. Curt-Ferdinand von Stakelberg
Frank: Dr. Gerhard Rauschenbach and Johann Schaetzler
Hohberg: Dr. Willi Heim and Dr. Wilhelm Maas; Dr. Ernst
Schulte
Kiefer: Dr. Erich Mayer and Dr. Ferdinand Leis
Klein: Dr. Friedrich Bergold and Dr. Oskar Ficht
G. Loerner: Dr. Carl Haensel and Dr. Heinz Mueller-Torgow
H. Loerner: Dr. Gerhard Rauschenbach and Johann Schaetzler; Dr.
Wilhelm Schmidt
Mummenthey, Karl: Dr. Georg Froeschmann and Dr. Karl Pracht
Pohl: Dr. Alfred Seidl and Dr. Georg Gierl
Pook: Dr. Paul Ratz
Scheide: Dr. Karl Hoffmann
Sommer: Dr. Eduard Belzer and Dr. Joseph Mayer; Dr. Karl
Hoffman
Tsentscher: Dr. Hans Pribilla and Helmut Eisenblaetter
Vogt: Dr. Wilhelm Schmidt
Volk: Dr. Hans Gawlik and Dr. Gerhard Klinnert
| 13 Jan 1947 | Indictment submitted |
| 10 Mar 1947 | Arraignment |
| 8 Apr 1947 | Prosecution opening statement; Pros. doc book 1 (defendants) |
| 9 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 2-3 (WVHA ), 4 (concentration camps) |
| 10 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 5-6 (concentration camps), 7 (medical experiments) |
| 11 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc book 9 (medical experiments) |
| 16 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 8 (medical experiments), 10 (euthanasia) |
| 17-18 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 11-13 (forced labor) |
| 18-25 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 14-17 (SS industries) |
| 25 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc book 18, 18A, 19 (extermination and expropriation of the Jews), 20 Warsaw ghetto |
| 14 May 1947 | Pros. doc. book 21 (additional documents) |
| 14-15 May 1947 | Defense opening statements |
| 16 May - 5 Jun 1947 | Pohl defense |
| 5-10 Jun 1947 | Frank defense |
| 10-12 Jun 1947 | Fanslau defense |
| 12-13 June 1947 | H. Loerner defense |
| 13-17 June 1947 | Vogt defense |
| 17-20 June 1947 | G. Loerner defense |
| 20-24 June 1947 | Tschentscher defense |
| 24-26 June 1947 | Kiefer defense |
| 26-28 June 1947 | Eirenschmalz defense |
| 8 June - 2 July 1947 | Sommer defense |
| 2-10 July 1947 | Pook defense |
| 10-11 July 1947 | Scheide defense |
| 11-21 July 1947 | Hohberg defense |
| 18 July 1947 | Tribunal ruling on Count One |
| 21-25 July 1947 | Baier defense |
| 25-30 July 1947 | Volk defense |
| 30 July - 7 Aug 1947 | Mummenthey defense |
| 7-12 Aug 1947 | Bobermin defense |
| 12-15 Aug 1947 | Klein defense |
| 18 Aug - | |
| 16 Sep 1947 | Additional witnesses and documents (prosecution and defense) |
| 17 Sep 1947 | Prosecution closing statement |
| 17-20 Sep 1947 | Defense closing statements (attorneys) |
| 22 Sep 1947 | Defendants' final statements |
| 3 Oct 1947 | Prosecution closing briefs (in English) submitted |
| 3 Nov 1947 | Judgments and sentences |
| 7 June 1948 | Military Governor order to reconvene for revision of judgment |
| 14 July 1948 | Tribunal order authorizing additional defense briefs |
| 11 Aug 1948 | Supplementary judgments and sentences |
| 30 Apr, 11 May 1949 | Confirmation and revision of sentences by Military Governor |
| 2 May 1949 | Denial of writ of habeas corpus by U.S.S.C. |
| 31 Jan 1951 | Sentences revised by U.S. High Commissioner McCloy |
The SS Wirtschafts und Verwaltungshauptamt (WVHA; Economic and Administrative Main Office) was established in March 1942, with Pohl as its chief. It took the place of several previous offices, including the Administrative Department (Verwaltungsamt) of the SS Central Office (SS Hauptamt), the Department of Budget and Buildings (Hauptamt Haushalt und Bauten), and the Inspector of Concentration Camps (Inspekteur der Konzentrationslager). The WVHA had five Amtsgruppen (office groups), each divided into Aemter (offices). Amtsgruppe A, headed first by Frank and later by Fanslau, was responsible for finance and administration of the WVHA and other elements of the SS. Amtsgruppe B, headed by Georg Loerner, was responsible for food, supplies, raw materials, and equipment for the SS and concentration camps. Amtsgruppe C, headed by SS Gen. Hans Kammler, was responsible for buildings, grounds, and construction, including those in concentration camps. Amtsgruppe D, headed by SS Gen. Richard Gluecks, was responsible for the administration of the concentration camps. Amtsgruppe W, headed by Pohl and Georg Loerner, was responsible for the business enterprises of the SS.
Chief of WVHA Oswald Pohl deputies: A. Frank (until 1943) G. Loerner (1943-45) Amtsgr. A Amtsgr. B Amtsgr. C Amtsgr. D Amtsgr. W Administration Supplies Construction Conc. camps Econ. enterprises A. Frank (-1944) G. Loerner Kammler Gluecks Pohl Fanslau (1944-45) dep. Tsentscher dep. Schleiff, dep. Liebehenschel dep. G. Loerner asst. Manzen- Kiefer dep. Maurer staff W: Hohberg, berger asst. Harbaum Baier, Volk Amt. A-1 Amt. B-1 Amt. C-1 Amt. D-1 Amt. W-1 Budgets Food General Central office Minerals-Reich H. Loerner Tsentscher Sesemann Liebehenschel Mummenthey Rall R. Hoess 43-45 Amt. A-2 Amt. B-2 Amt. C-2 Amt. D-2 Amt. W-2 Finance/payroll Clothing Special Inmate labor Minerals-East Kukatsch (1942) Lechler Kiefer Maurer Bobermin H. Loerner (43-45) dep. Sommer Amt. A-3 Amt. B-3 Amt. C-3 Amt. D-3 Amt. W-3 Legal Housing Technical Medical Food Salpeter (1942) Koberlein Floto Lolling Rabineck (1942) Frank Wirtz dental: Pook Moeckel Amt. A-4 Amt. B-4 Amt. C-4 Amt. D-4 Amt. W-4 Audits Raw materials Art projects Camp admin. Timber Vogt Weggel Schneider Burger (1942) May Blaschek Kaindl Opperbeck Amt. A-5 Amt. B-5 Amt. C-5 Legal Dept. Amt. W-5 Personnel Transport Inspectorate Wiener Agric./forest/fish. Fanslau Scheide Noell Vogel Lenzer Amt. C-6 Amt. W-6 Maintenance Textiles/leather Eirenschmalz Lechler Amt. W-7 Books/pictures Mischke Amt. W-8 Special projects Salpeter Klein
Central administration: See Amtsgruppe D in WVHA chart (above). All of the camps except Herzogenbusch were within the wartime expanded Reich borders. Information drawn from L. L. Snyder, Encyclopedia of the Third Reich (1976) and C. Zentner and F. Beduerftig, Encyclopedia of the Third Reich (1997). The SS also maintained over 150 labor camps during the war. Most of the concentration camps employed forced labor for construction work, armaments work, manufacturing, and agriculture, including some work-to-death regimes (notably in the quarry operations); many of the camps were the site of medical experiments and euthanasia operations. The large camps had many satellite sub-camps for work projects. The Polish camps were extermination camps, but selective executions (including the killing of Jews, Poles, Russians, and disabled persons) were also conducted at camps within Germany. The commandants and other senior officers of the camps were generally prosecuted at local war crimes trials, notably the trial of Rudolf Hoess and his subordinates at Auschwitz.
| 13 Jan 1947 | Indictment submitted | ||
| 10 Mar 1947 | Arraignment: indictment read | 1-12 | |
| Arraignment: pleas | 12-19 | ||
| 8 Apr 1947 | Prosecution opening statement | 1-88 | |
| 8 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc book 1: Documents, persons, and organizations | 90-102 | |
| 9 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc. books 2-3: WVHA organization | 103-125, 126-153 | |
| 9 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc. books 2-3: doc. book 4 (concentration camps) | 153-169 | |
| 10 Apr 1947 | Karl Kahr (P) | 173-207 | |
| 10 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 5-6 (concentration camps) | 208-223, 223-231 | |
| doc. book 7 (medical experiments) | 232-275 | ||
| 11 Apr 1947 | Victor Abend (P) | 252-273 | |
| 11 Apr 1947 | Bernhard Lauber (P) | 282-297 | |
| 11, 14 Apr 1947 | Jerzy Bielski (P) | 302-19, 341-399 | |
| 11, 15 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc book 9 (medical experiments) | 320-333, 511-529 | |
| 14 Apr 1947 | Joseph Krysiak | 399-440 | |
| 15 Apr 1947 | Albert H. Kruse (P) | 442-510 | |
| 16 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 8 (medical experiments), 10 (euthanasia) | 530-551, 552-570 | |
| 17 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 11-12 (forced labor) | 571-595, 596-625 | |
| 18 Apr 1947 | Pros. doc books 13 (forced labor), 14 (SS industries) | 625-653, 653-56 | |
| 18 Apr 1947 | Chaim Balizki (P) | 631-641 | |
| 21 Apr 1947 | Herbert Engler (P) | 659-720 | |
| 21-23 Apr 1947 | Eugen Kogon (P) | 720-923 | |
| 23-24 Apr 1947 | Josef Ackerman (P) | 929-992 | |
| 24-25 Apr 1947 | Pros doc books 14 | cont., 993-999 | |
| 15-17 (SS industries) | 999-1031 | ||
| 25 Apr 1947 | Pros doc book 18, 18A, 19 (Extermination of the Jews) | 1032-1070 | |
| doc. book 20 (Warsaw ghetto) | 1075-1084 | ||
| 14 May 1947 | Pros doc book 21 (additional documents) | 1088-1092 | |
| 14 May 1947 | Defense begins | 1092 | |
| Opening statements: | |||
| Pohl | 1099-1121 | ||
| Fanslau | 1122-31 | ||
| Eirenschmalz | 1132-33 | ||
| Sommer | 1133-40 | ||
| Hohberg | 1143-50 | ||
| Frank | 1150-61 | ||
| H. Loerner | 1161-63 | ||
| Tschentscher | 1164-69 | ||
| Vogt | 1170-75 | ||
| G. Loerner | 1176-84 | ||
| 15 May 1947 | Defense opening statements: | ||
| Scheide | 1187-1200 | ||
| Klein | 1200-07 | ||
| Volk | 1207-16 | ||
| Bobermin | 1216-22 | ||
| Kiefer | 1223-29 | ||
| Baier | 1230-32 | ||
| Mummenthey | 1233-35 | ||
| Pook | 1237-1251 | ||
| 16 May - 5 June 1947 | Oswald Pohl defense | 1253-2230 | |
| 16 May - 3 June 1947 | O. Pohl (D) | 1253-2040 | |
| 3 June 1947 | Kurt Schmidt-Klevenow (D) | 2041-2090 | |
| 3-5 June 1947 | Karl Wolff (D) | 2090-2206 | |
| 5 June 1947 | Rudolf Brandt (D) | 2207-2229 | |
| 5-10 June 1947 | August Frank defense | 2231-2487 | |
| 5-10 June 1947 | A. Frank (D) | 2231-2487; 7410-7417 | |
| 10-12 June 1947 | Heinz Fanslau defense | 2488-2675 | |
| 10 June 1947 | Johann Stein (D) | 2489-2530 | |
| 11-12 June 1947 | H. Fanslau (D) | 2531-2675 | |
| 12-13 June 1947 | Hans Loerner defense | 2675-2756 | |
| 12-13 June 1947 | Hans Loerner (D) | 2675-2756 | |
| 13-17 June 1947 | Josef Vogt defense | 2756-2916 | |
| 13-17 June 1947 | Josef Vogt (D) | 2757-2916 | |
| 17-20 June 1947 | Georg Loerner defense | 2916-3151 | |
| 17-20 June 1947 | Georg Loerner (D) | 2916-3151 | |
| 20-24 June 1947 | Erwin Tschentscher defense | 3151-3297 | |
| 20-24 June 1947 | Erwin Tschentscher (D) | 3152-3261 | |
| 24 June 1947 | Walter Hoyer (D) | 3262-3278 | |
| 24 June 1947 | Arnold J. H. Ertel (D) | 3279-3295 | |
| 24-26 June 1947 | Max Kiefer defense | 3297-3419 | |
| 24-26 June 1947 | Max Kiefer (D) | 3297-3417 | |
| 26-28 June 1947 | Franz Eirenschmalz defense | 3419-3598 | |
| 26-27 June 1947 | Franz Eirenschmalz (D) | 3421-3564 | |
| 27-28 June 1947 | Wolfgang Grosch (D) | 3565-3597 | |
| 28 June - 2 July 1947 | Karl Sommer defense | 3598-3878 | |
| 28 June 1947 | Georg Rammler (D) | 3600-3639 | |
| 28 June 1947 | Joachim Caesar (D) | 3639-3652 | |
| 30 June - 2 July 1947 | Karl Sommer (D) | 3653-3878 | |
| 2-10 July 1947 | Hermann Pook defense | 3878-4091 | |
| 2-9 July 1947 | Hermann Pook (D) | 3879-4067 | |
| 9-10 July 1947 | Paul Reutter (D) | 4067-4091 | |
| 10-11 July 1947 | Rudolf Scheide defense, with Scheide documents | 4091-4213 | |
| 10-11 July 1947 | Rudolf Scheide (D) | 4091-4203 | |
| 11-21 July 1947 | Hans Hohberg defense | 4214-4657 | |
| 11-18 July 1947 | Hans K. Hohberg (D) | 4215-4584 | |
| 18 July 1947 | Tribunal ruling on Count One | 4589-4590 | |
| 18 July 1947 | Max Wolf (D) | 4591-4629 | |
| 18 July 1947 | Heinrich Tenbergen (D) | 4632-4655 | |
| 21-25 July 1947 | Hans Baier defense | 4657-4995 | |
| 21-22 July 1947 | Hermann Karoli (D) | 4658-4769 | |
| 22-25 July 1947 | Hans Baier (D) | 4770-4995 | |
| 25-30 July 1947 | Leo Volk defense | 4995-5282 | |
| 25-30 July 1947 | Leo Volk (D) | 4995-5282 | |
| 30 July - 7 Aug 1947 | Karl Mummenthey defense | 5283-5772 | |
| 30-31 July 1947 | Heinz Schwarz (D) | 5284-5381 | |
| 31 July, 4 Aug 1947 | Helmut Bickel (D) | 5381-5512 | |
| 4-7 Aug 1947 | Karl Mummenthey (D) | 5512-5769 | |
| 7-12 Aug 1947 | Hans Bobermin defense | 5772-6029 | |
| 7 Aug 1947 | Max Winkler (D) | 5773-5815 | |
| 7-12 Aug 1947 | Hans Bobermin (D) | 5816-6029 | |
| 12-15 Aug 1947 | Horst Klein defense | 6029-6307 | |
| 12 Aug 1947 | Helga von Rouppert (D) | 6034-6068 | |
| 12-13 Aug 1947 | H. Klein documents | 6068-6089 | |
| 13-15 Aug 1947 | Horst Klein (D) | 6090-6115, 6125-6237, 6264-6307 | |
| 13 Aug 1947 | Larry Wolff (T) | 6115-6125 | |
| 15 Aug 1947 | Discussion of final arguments and briefs | 6238-6264 | |
| 18 Aug 1947 | Friedrich Bergold (D) | 6312 | |
| 18 Aug 1947 | Hubert Karl (P) | 6316-6347, 6352-6371 | |
| 18-20 Aug 1947 | Guenther Otto (P) | 6371-6501, 6527-6562 | |
| 20 Aug 1947 | Wolfgang Sanner (P) | 6503-6527 | |
| 20-21 Aug 1947 | Arnold Sauer (P) | 6563-6607 | |
| 21 Aug 1947 | Camille Sachs (P) | 6610-6639 | |
| 21 Aug 1947 | Heinrich Ebbers (P) | 6640-6646 | |
| 21 Aug 1947 | Heinrich Schwartz (T) | 6647-6669 | |
| 21-22 Aug 1947 | Konrad Morgen (D, for Scheide) | 6669-6753 | |
| 25 Aug 1947 | Oswald Pohl (D) | 6759-6786 | |
| 25 Aug 1947 | Karl Steichele (D, for Fanslau) | 6787-6814 | |
| 25 Aug 1947 | Franz Freitag (D) | 6815-6826 | |
| 25 Aug 1947 | Pros. doc. books 22-25 (exhibits 522-619) | 6833-6834 | |
| 25-26 Aug 1947 | Defense documents: | ||
| Fanslau | 6835-42 | ||
| Frank | 6843-52 | ||
| H. Loerner | 6852-55 | ||
| G. Loerner | 6855-64 | ||
| Sommer | 6865-77 | ||
| Hohberg | 6878-6888 | ||
| Mummenthey | 6891-6910 | ||
| 27 Aug 1947 | Karl Wiedenfeldt (P) | 6911-6973 | |
| 27-28 Aug, 3 Sep 1947 | Heinz Fanslau (D) | 6973-7048, 7357-7366 | |
| 28-29 Aug 1947 | Erwin Tschentscher (D) | 7049-7103, 7127-7133 | |
| 29 Aug 1947 | Anton Goldstein (P) | 7106-7126 | |
| 29 Aug 1947 | Willi Schaefer (D) | 7134-7154 | |
| 29 Aug 1947 | Erich Mueller (D) | 7159-7171 | |
| 2 Sep 1947 | Pros. doc books 26-28 (exhibits 620-683) | 7178-7200 | |
| 2 Sep 1947 | Georg Staminger (D) | 7202-7225 | |
| 2 Sep 1947 | Felix Steiner (D) | 7226-7257 | |
| 2 Sep 1947 | Hans K. Hohberg (D) | 7258-7269 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Hermann Karoli (D) | 7270-7273 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Hans Fritzsche (D) | 7273-7308 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Solomon Jollek (P) | 7310-7329 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Wilhelm Krause (D) | 7332-7341 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Albert Schiatowsky (D) | 7342-7344 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Ernst Specht (D) | 7344-7345 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Pros. doc. book 28 (ex 684-696) | 7347-7357 | |
| 3 Sep 1947 | Fanslau (D) | 7357-7366 | |
| 4 Sep 1947 | Pros. doc. books 29-31 (ex 697-726, 635-639) | 7368-7392, 7418 | |
| 4 Sep 1947 | Defense documents: | ||
| Pohl | 7401-7409 | ||
| Tschentscher | 7418-7421 | ||
| Mummenthey | 7424-7434 | ||
| Baier | 7451-7463 | ||
| Eirenschmalz | 7464-7469 | ||
| Kiefer | 7469-7470 | ||
| 4 Sep 1947 | Frank (D) | 7410-7417 | |
| 4 Sep 1947 | Georg Loerner (D) | 7423-7424 | |
| 4 Sep 1947 | Horst Klein (D) | 7436-7442 | |
| 4 Sep 1947 | Leo Volk (D) | 7442-7450 | |
| 15 Sep 1947 | Pros. doc. book 33 (ex 727-735) | 7471-7474 | |
| 15 Sep 1947 | Defense documents: | ||
| Frank | 7474-7477 | ||
| H. Loerner | 7477-7478 | ||
| Pohl | 7478-7483 | ||
| Fanslau | 7483-7485, 7495-7496 | ||
| Vogt | 7485-7494 | ||
| G. Loerner | 7496-7500 | ||
| Tschentscher | 7501-7503 | ||
| Eirenschmalz | 7503-7511) | ||
| 16 Sep 1947 | Defense documents: | ||
| Sommer | 7513-7515 | ||
| Pook | 7515-7523 | ||
| Hohberg | 7523-7526 | ||
| Bobermin | 7528-7542 | ||
| Volk | 7542-7545, 7552-7563 | ||
| Mummenthey | 7545-7551 | ||
| 17 Sep 1947 | Prosecution closing statement | 7565-7637 | |
| 17 Sep 1947 | Defense closing statements (by attorneys): | ||
| Pohl | 7640-7724 | ||
| Frank | 7725-7756 | ||
| 18 Sep 1947 | Defense closing statements: | ||
| Fanslau | 7758-7792 | ||
| Sommer | 7793-7827 | ||
| Bobermin and Volk | 7829 | ||
| Hohberg | 7831-7868 | ||
| Pook | 7868-7882 | ||
| 19 Sep 1947 | Defense closing statements: | ||
| Pook | 7883-7908 | ||
| G. Loerner | 7909-7924 | ||
| Scheide | 7925-7937 | ||
| Vogt | 7937-7939 | ||
| Kiefer | 7940 | ||
| Tschentscher | 7940 | ||
| 20 Sep 1947 | Defense closing statements: | ||
| Mummenthey | 7944-7977 | ||
| Klein | 7978-8009 | ||
| 22 Sep 1947 | Defendants' final statements | 8011-8047 | |
| 3 Oct 1947 | Prosecution closing briefs (in English) submitted | ||
| 3 Nov 1947 | Judgments and sentences | 8049-8201 (end of transcript) | |
| 7 June 1948 | Military Governor order to reconvene for revision of judgment | ||
| 14 July 1948 | Tribunal order authorizing additional defense briefs | ||
| 11 Aug 1948 | Supplementary judgments and sentences | ||
| 30 Apr, 11 May 1949 | Confirmation and revision of sentences by Military Governor | ||
| 2 May 1949 | Denial of writ of habeas corpus by U.S. Supreme Court | ||
| 31 Jan 1951 | Sentences revised by High Commissioner McCloy |


Person-er
-
adventurer: 冒险者；冒险家 a person who enjoys exciting new experiences, especially going to unusual places
-
announcer: （广播、电视的）广播员，播音员，节目主持人 a person who introduces, or gives information about, programmes on the radio or television
-
astronomer: 天文学家 a scientist who studies astronomy
-
banker: 银行老板（或要员）；银行家 a person who owns a bank or has an important job at a bank
-
butcher: 屠夫；肉贩 a person whose job is cutting up and selling meat in a shop/store or killing animals for this purpose
-
carpenter: 木工；木匠 a person whose job is making and repairing wooden objects and structures
-
carrier: 搬运人；运送人；运输工具 a person or thing that carries sth
-
commuter: （远距离）上下班往返的人 a person who travels into a city to work each day, usually from quite far away
-
dealer: 交易商；贸易商 a person whose business is buying and selling a particular product
-
fishmonger: 鱼贩；鱼商 a person whose job is to sell fish in a shop
-
hairdresser: 理发师；美发师；发型师 a person whose job is to cut, wash and shape hair
-
juggler: 玩杂耍的人；耍把戏的人；变戏法的人 a person who juggles , especially an entertainer
-
onlooker: 旁观者 a person who watches sth that is happening but is not involved in it
-
pensioner: 领养老金（或退休金、抚恤金）者 a person who is receiving a pension, especially from the government
-
petitioner: 恳求者；请求者 a person who makes a formal request to sb in authority
-
plumber: 水暖工；管子工；铅管工 a person whose job is to fit and repair things such as water pipes, toilets, etc.
-
practitioner: （广泛意义上来说）习艺者；专门人才 a person who regularly does a particular activity, especially one that requires skill （尤指医学或法律界的）从业人员a person who works in a profession, especially medicine or law
-
robber: 强盗；盗贼；抢劫犯 a person who steals from a person or place, especially using violence or threats
-
shopkeeper: （通常指小商店的）店主 a person who owns or manages a shop/store, usually a small one
-
soothsayer: 占卜者；预言者 a person who is believed to be able to tell what will happen in the future
-
treasurer: （俱乐部或组织的）司库，会计，出纳，财务主管 a person who is responsible for the money and accounts of a club or an organization
-
:


Make sure you have created an experiment instance and that the experiment instance is currently running.
| HIT Created | |
|---|---|
| Creation Time | {{hit.creationTime}} |
| HIT Id | {{hit.hitId}} |
| Title | {{hit.title}} |
| Description | {{hit.description}} |
| Reward | {{hit.reward}} |
| HIT lifetime (in seconds) | {{hit.lifetimeInSeconds}} |
| Tutorial time (in seconds) | {{hit.tutorialTime}} |
| Max. Assignments | {{hit.maxAssignments}} |
| URL | {{hit.externalURL}} |
| Sandbox? | {{hit.sandbox}} |


| GCode | Description |
|---|---|
| M851 Z0 | Set Z-probe offset to 0. |
| M500 | Save all configurable settings to EEPROM. |
| M501 | Load all saved settings from EEPROM. |
| M503 | Print all runtime-configurable settings to the host console. |
| G28 | Auto home. |
| G1 F60 Z0 | Move to Z0. |
| M211 S0 | Unlock software endstops to enable movement below Z0. |
| M109 S190 | Set nozzle temperature to 220 °C. |
| G1 F60 Z-0.2 | Move extruder to Z-0.2. Adjust the value in the previous step until you can just barely move a piece of paper placed between the nozzle and print bed. Subtract another 0.1 from this value. This will be your new Z-probe offset value. |
| M851 Z-2.2 | Set Z-probe offset to -2.2. This value should be whatever you measured in the previous step. |
| M211 S0 | Lock software endstops to prevent movement below Z0. |
| M500 | Save all configurable settings to EEPROM. |
| M501 | Load all saved settings from EEPROM. |
| M503 | Print all runtime-configurable settings to the host console. |
| G28 | Auto home. |
| G1 F60 Z0 | Move to Z0 to confirm. |
| M109 S0 | Set nozzle temperature to 0 °C. |
start.gcode
; Set Heat Bed temperature
M140 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}
; Set Extruder temperature
M104 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}
; Home all axes
G28
; Level bed
G29
; Reset Extruder
G92 E0
; Move to start position
G1 X0.1 Y20 Z0.3 F5000.0
; Wait for Heat Bed temperature
M190 S{material_bed_temperature_layer_0}
; Wait for Extruder temperature
M109 S{material_print_temperature_layer_0}
; Draw the first line
G1 X5.5 Y200.0 Z0.3 F1500.0 E15
; Move to side a little
G1 X5.9 Y200.0 Z0.3 F5000.0
; Draw the second line
G1 X5.9 Y20 Z0.3 F1500.0 E30
; Reset Extruder
G92 E0
; Move Z Axis up little to prevent scratching of Heat Bed
G1 Z2.0 F3000
end.gcode
; Relative positioning
G91
; Retract
G1 E-2 F2700
; Retract and raise Z
G1 E-2 Z0.2 F2400
; Wipe out
G1 X5 Y5 F3000
; Raise Z more
G1 Z10
; Absolute positionning
G90
; Present
G1 X0 Y{machine_depth}
; Turn-off fan
M106 S0
; Turn-off hotend
M104 S0
; Turn-off bed
M140 S0
; Disable all steppers but Z
M84 X Y E


{% extends "shop/checkout/base_confirm.html" %} {% load i18n %} {% load satchmo_currency satchmo_order %} {# this is the gift certificate confirmation template #} {% block errorheader %}We got an error while trying to charge your gift certificate{% endblock %} {% block navbar %} {% trans "Home" %} :: {% trans "Checkout" %} {% endblock %} {% block payment_display %}
{% blocktrans %}Order total: {{ orderbalance }}{% endblocktrans %}
{% blocktrans %}You are about to use Gift certificate #{{ giftcode }} which has {{ certbalance }} total available to pay for your order.{% endblocktrans %}
{% blocktrans %}If there isn't enough remaining to pay for the whole order, you'll be able to select another form of payment for the balance after you use this gift certificate.{% endblocktrans %}
{% endwith %} {% endwith %} {% endwith %} {% endwith %} {% endblock %}


NINE MONTHS A film review by James Berardinelli Copyright 1995 James Berardinelli
RATING (0 TO 10): 6.6
United States, 1995 U.S. Availability: wide release 7/12/95 Running Length: 1:42 MPAA Classification: PG-13 (Mature themes, profanity, sexual innuendo) Theatrical Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1
Cast: Hugh Grant, Julianne Moore, Tom Arnold, Joan Cusack, Jeff Goldblum, Robin Williams Director: Chris Columbus Producers: Michael Barnathan, Chris Columbus, Anne Francois, and Mark Radcliffe Screenplay: Chris Columbus Cinematography: Donald McAlpine U.S. Distributor: Twentieth Century Fox
With HOME ALONE and MRS. DOUBTFIRE, director Chris Columbus has shown an aptitude for rescuing reasonably mediocre films by infusing them with doses of high-energy humor. If not for certain hilarious sequences, neither of those movies would have climbed above the usual continuum of forgettable comedies. Now, adapting from a French screenplay (NEUF MOIS), Columbus has chosen to helm this exploration of the ups and downs of pregnancy.
For the most part, "unspectacular" is an apt description for NINE MONTHS. The motion picture has a pedestrian script that attempts, with only limited success, to wed a romantic comedy with a one-hundred minute exhortation on the joys of having a family. Bursts of hilarity -- and there are three worth mentioning -- save NINE MONTHS from wearing out its welcome. One of the more obvious problems with the film is that it takes a few feeble stabs at drama, something this sort of movie is not well-suited for.
Hugh Grant plays Dr. Samuel Faulkner, a child psychiatrist who, paradoxically, is afraid of kids. His live-in lover of five years, Rebecca (Julianne Moore), is beginning to realize that something is missing from her life. It's not until she discovers she's pregnant that she realizes her maternal instincts have been in overdrive. Unfortunately, Samuel doesn't share Rebecca's excitement about impending parenthood, and spends so much time bemoaning the loss of his perfect lifestyle that his distraught girlfriend moves out. Refusing to see Samuel, she lodges with a pregnant friend (Joan Cusack) and her boorish husband (Tom Arnold).
Despite limited screen time, the real star of NINE MONTHS is Robin Williams. Playing an obstetrician from Russia who has never delivered a human baby and seems more adept at malapropisms than diagnoses, the lead from MRS. DOUBTFIRE shows that he and director Columbus have formed an excellent rapport. With his mastery of physical comedy, Williams is right at home in the midst of this hit-and-miss farce.
Grant, with his "aw shucks" manner and bumbling cuteness, was very good in both FOUR WEDDINGS AND A FUNERAL and THE ENGLISHMAN WHO WENT UP A HILL..., but seems a little out of his element in this, his first big budget, Hollywood movie. Grant's undeniable strength lies in his subtlety, and that's not a quality Columbus films are renowned for. There are times when the actor is charming and charismatic, but those instances are mixed with scenes where he seems lost.
Julianne Moore, on the other hand, continues to display great range. Although there's nothing spectacular about the role of Rebecca, this part, taken in conjunction with her appearances in SHORT CUTS and SAFE, is indicative of the breadth of the actress' ability. On the other hand, following a reasonably strong turnout as Arnold Schwarzenegger's sidekick in TRUE LIES, Tom Arnold gives an uneven performance. On those occasions when he's not funny, he tends to be just plain irritating.
Three sequences in NINE MONTHS are guaranteed to get huge laughs. The first involves a toy store fracas between the two male leads and a green dinosaur ("Arnie") with a penchant for profanity. The second is madcap drive to the hospital in which Samuel manages to injure just about everyone who gets in his way. Then there's the delivery room, where the birth becomes almost incidental. Sprinkled around these payoff scenes are smaller chuckles, but, on the whole, the comic tone is uneven. Those expecting to spend one-hundred minutes rolling in the aisles will probably be disappointed, but, if nothing else, this film offers a light summer option for anyone whose palates has not acquired a taste for action.
- James Berardinelli<EMAIL_ADDRESS>The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


ERASER A film review by Scott Renshaw Copyright 1996 Scott Renshaw
Starring: Arnold Schwarzenegger, James Caan, Vanessa Williams, Robert Pastorelli. Screenplay: Tony Puryear, Walon Green. Director: Charles Russell. Reviewed by Scott Renshaw.
ERASER is a strange case this summer. Here is an Arnold Schwarzenegger action film, carrying an estimated $80 million price tag, recently in entertainment headlines for last-minute digital work required to change the name of the company in the film due to a legal challenge...and hardly anyone seems to be talking about it. In a movie season where marketing has attempted to turn every subsequent blockbuster into a pop culture happening, ERASER seems to be just another supporting player; it is even sharing its release date with Disney's latest animated fiscal printing press THE HUNCHBACK OF NOTRE DAME. Arnold seems to have managed the heretofore unthinkable feat of becoming unobtrusive. The result might be an absence of overly high expectations, which can only work in ERASER's favor. It's generic Schwarzeneggerian action fare which almost manages to seem quaint in its cartoonish basic-ness.
Schwarzenegger plays John Kruger, a U. S. Marshal working for the Federal Witness Protection Program whose specialty is staging the deaths of his charges to keep them safe -- hence his code name "Eraser." His latest case is Lee Cullen (Vanessa Williams), an employee at defense contractor Cyrez who has agreed to obtain proof that the company is involved in the sale of experimental weaponry on the black market. What Kruger is soon to realize is that even government officials are involved in the operation, perhaps including his own mentor Robert Deguerin (James Caan). But it is Kruger himself who is set up as a traitor, and forced to keep both himself and Lee alive. With no one he can trust except his other re-located witnesses, including mob stool pigeon Johnny Casteleone (Robert Pastorelli), Kruger must find proof of his own innocence as he tries to stop the gun-runners.
ERASER is pretty much everything you've come to expect from a Schwarzenegger action vehicle: impossible odds, explosions, predictable and groan-inducing one-liners (if you can't tell me what precedes the line "They had to catch a train," please sign up for Remedial Arnie-isms), big cool guns, and big cool Arnie firing them with abandon. Director Charles Russell (THE MASK) leaps right into the action with scarcely a breath, and for the next 100 minutes seems blissfully concerned with little else. It is as though he were saying to the audience, "I've given you a good guy and some bad guys -- you know how it's going to end, now enjoy the ride."
And in spurts, it's actually possible to do so. During one marvelously sill twenty minute stretch, Schwarzenegger leaps from a plane to catch up with a parachute he has already thrown out of it, faces down the same plane while still floating through the air, crash lands in a junkyard, appropriates a truck, races to a zoo and ends up battling with villainous Feds _and_ digitally-created alligators. In those scenes, ERASER is pure mindless fun in the best sense of the term, but those scenes are also somewhat isolated. There is a surprising grimness to much of ERASER, including two separate incidents where Kruger takes an excruciatingly long time to remove a piece of shrapnel from his flesh, and Schwarzenegger himself is overly somber in much of his performance, brooding over a Dark Past to which we are not made privy. These token attempts by Russell and his screenplay-by-committee team to make Schwarzenegger more vulnerable and human demonstrate a real misunderstanding of his appeal.  There are far too few opportunities to laugh in ERASER, except those provided by Robert Pastorelli as the motor-mouthed wiseguy who becomes Kruger's assistant.
The irony of ERASER is that it turns its greatest asset into a weakness. In a season filled with films which seem to be playing hyped-up games of "Can You Top This?" with their visual effects and decibel levels, ERASER provides an odd familiarity -- it's just li'l ol' Arnie, playing hero and making the world safe for democracy.  ERASER manages a few solidly entertaining moments, and serves up the kind of meat-and-potatoes action Schwarzenegger's fans have come to expect. It also is a film which spends a lot of time shuffling its feet, and it will be interesting to see how audiences respond to a blockbuster which seems to be saying, "Don't mind me."
On the Renshaw scale of 0 to 10 ERASER's edges: 5.
-- Scott Renshaw Stanford University http://www-leland.stanford.edu
The review above was posted to the
rec.arts.movies.reviews newsgroup (de.rec.film.kritiken for German reviews).
The Internet Movie Database accepts no responsibility for the contents of the
review and has no editorial control. Unless stated otherwise, the copyright
belongs to the author.
Please direct comments/criticisms of the review to relevant newsgroups.
Broken URLs inthe reviews are the responsibility of the author.
The formatting of the review is likely to differ from the original due
to ASCII to HTML conversion.
Related links: index of all rec.arts.movies.reviews reviews


@*
* Copyright 2023 HM Revenue & Customs
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*@
@import uk.gov.hmrc.cataloguefrontend.DateHelper._
@import uk.gov.hmrc.cataloguefrontend.connector.Team
@(teams: Seq[Team],
name : Option[String]
)(implicit
request: RequestHeader
)
@standard_layout("Teams list", "teams") {
Teams
| @team.name.asString | @team.createdDate.map(_.asPattern(`yyyy-MM-dd`)).getOrElse("") | @team.lastActiveDate.map(_.asPattern(`yyyy-MM-dd`)).getOrElse("") | @team.repos |


public class ActorRuleCreator
extends java.lang.Object
| Constructor and Description |
|---|
ActorRuleCreator(ActorEditingEnvironment aEE,
Controller myController) |
| Modifier and Type | Method and Description |
|---|---|
void |
addBehavior(ActorRule rule,
javafx.scene.control.Label behavior)
Add given behavior to given ActorRule
|
void |
addImage(ActorRule rule,
javafx.scene.control.Label image)
Add given image to given ActorRule
|
void |
addNewRule()
Create new rule for Actor currently in the actor editing environment
|
void |
addSound(ActorRule rule,
javafx.scene.control.Label sound)
Add given sound to given ActorRule
|
Controller |
getController()
Return reference to Controller
|
javafx.scene.layout.GridPane |
getGridPane()
Get GridPane representation of actor rule creator
|
java.util.List<ActorRule> |
getRules()
Get ActorRules for Actor currently in the actor editing environment
|
void |
removeRule(ActorRule actorRule)
Remove given rule from Actor currently in the actor editing environment
|
void |
updateRules()
Each time actor editing environment is opened and set to a specific Actor, populates editing environment rules and
fields based on the Actor
|
public ActorRuleCreator(ActorEditingEnvironment aEE, Controller myController)
public javafx.scene.layout.GridPane getGridPane()
public void addBehavior(ActorRule rule, javafx.scene.control.Label behavior)
rule
- behavior
- public void addSound(ActorRule rule, javafx.scene.control.Label sound)
rule
- sound
- public void addImage(ActorRule rule, javafx.scene.control.Label image)
rule
- image
- public void addNewRule()
public void removeRule(ActorRule actorRule)
actorRule
- public java.util.List<ActorRule> getRules()
public Controller getController()
public void updateRules()


NOTICE: Tasks imported using GTI are not displayed on Google Calendar
Since 31 May, imported tasks appear in the Google Tasks side panel in Gmail and Google Calendar, but do not appear at the top of Google Calendar.
Only tasks created or edited in the Tasks side panel will appear on the Google Calendar. An imported task will only appear on Google Calendar if the due date of the imported task is changed in the Tasks side panel.
This is a Google issue, and appears to affect any third party applications which import or manage Google Tasks, such as CalenGoo for Android.
The issue has been reported to Google at https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/133809207
Please go to the the issue page (opens in a new tab) and click on the star to let Google know that you are affected by this issue. If you click on the star, you will receive an email whenever the issue is updated.


 Reading through the guides and reference here will give you a complete understanding of how Sentry works and how to get the most out of it. We recommend that you read through the Guides first, then on to the client installation instructions for your specific platform.
If your specific question or concern isn't covered in the docs, we're here to help. Please don't hesitate to:
Just like Sentry itself, our docs are open source. If you've found an error or think something could be explained more clearly, you're always welcomed (and encouraged) to submit a pull request.
{% endblock main %}


dbus-monitor - debug probe to print message bus messages
dbus-monitor [--system | --session | --address ADDRESS] [--profile | --monitor] [watch expressions]
The dbus-monitor command is used to monitor messages going through a D-Bus message bus. See m[blue]http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus/m[] for more information about the big picture.
There are two well-known message buses: the systemwide message bus (installed on many systems as the "messagebus" service) and the per-user-login-session message bus (started each time a user logs in). The --system and --session options direct dbus-monitor to monitor the system or session buses respectively. If neither is specified, dbus-monitor monitors the session bus.
dbus-monitor has two different output modes, the *(Aqclassic*(Aq-style monitoring mode and profiling mode. The profiling format is a compact format with a single line per message and microsecond-resolution timing information. The --profile and --monitor options select the profiling and monitoring output format respectively. If neither is specified, dbus-monitor uses the monitoring output format.
In order to get dbus-monitor to see the messages you are interested in, you should specify a set of watch expressions as you would expect to be passed to the dbus_bus_add_match function.
The message bus configuration may keep dbus-monitor from seeing all messages, especially if you run the monitor as a non-root user.
--system
Monitor the system message bus.
--session
Monitor the session message bus. (This is the default.)
--address ADDRESS
Monitor an arbitrary message bus given at ADDRESS.
--profile
Use the profiling output format.
--monitor
Use the monitoring output format. (This is the default.)
Here is an example of using dbus-monitor to watch for the gnome typing monitor to say things
dbus-monitor "type=*(Aqsignal*(Aq,sender=*(Aqorg.gnome.TypingMonitor*(Aq,interface=*(Aqorg.gnome.TypingMonitor*(Aq"
dbus-monitor was written by Philip Blundell. The profiling output mode was added by Olli Salli.
Please send bug reports to the D-Bus mailing list or bug tracker, see m[blue]http://www.freedesktop.org/software/dbus/m[]


Gilt Featured at Fordham Technology Summit on 10/16
Gilt VP of Product Management & User Experience Dominique Essig is one of the featured presenters at tomorrow’s second annual Summit on Technology Innovation and Start Ups in the Bronx, hosted by the Center for Digital Transformation, Urban Studies Program and Urban Law Center at Fordham University. Dom joins executives from Google, Siris Capital, Accenture and other companies and institutions at this half-day conference, which focuses on the opportunities and challenges of growing the Bronx as a technology hub. To attend (it’s free), just click here.


This file was downloaded from Pokemon Online Roms
http://www.pokemononlineroms.com/
You are now being redirected to the site (click on the link above if this does not work)...


Master Student
Data Science and Information Technology
Tsinghua University
Email: wdli10 at outlook.com
CV / LinkedIn
About Me
I am a third year master student at Tsinghua University. I am affiliated with the Internet of Things and Societal Cyber Physical Systems Lab. My research lies in societal computing, social networks security, and data science.
Before joining THU, I received my B.S. (with honors) from School of Computer Science at Fudan University, where I was advised by Prof. Yang Chen and Prof. Jianping Zeng.
Publications
-
Optimising Self-Organised Volunteer Efforts in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. [Paper][Link]
Anping Zhang*, Ke Zhang*, Wanda Li, Yue Wang, Yang Li, Lin Zhang.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2022.
-
DeepPick: A Deep Learning Approach to Unveil Outstanding Users with Public Attainable Features. [Paper]
Wanda Li, Zhiwei Xu, Yi Sun, Qingyuan Gong, Yang Chen, Aaron Yi Ding, Xin Wang, Pan Hui.
IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering (TKDE), 2021.
-
Leet Usage and Its Effect on Password Security. [Paper]
Wanda Li, Jianping Zeng.
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security (TIFS), 2021.
-
OD-HyperNet: A Data-Driven Hyper-Network Model for Origin-Destination Matrices Completion Using Partially Observed Data. [Paper]
Yuxuan Xiu, Wanda Li, Wai Kin Victor Chan.
Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Logistics, Informatics and Service Sciences (LISS '20).
Research Experience
-
Penn State University.   Remote
Research Assistant, advised by Prof. Suhang Wang. Jun. 2022 - Aug. 2022
-
Tsinghua University.   Shenzhen, China
Research Assistant at the Intelligent Transportation and Logistics Systems Lab, advised by Prof. Wai Kin (Victor) Chan. Sep. 2019 - Sep. 2020
-
Fudan University.   Shanghai, China
B.S. in Computer Science Sep. 2016 – June 2020
Research Assistant at the Mobile Systems and Networking (MSN) group, advised by Prof. Yang Chen. Oct. 2018 – June 2020
Research Assistant at the Network Security group, advised by Prof. Jianping Zeng. Jan 2018 – Sep. 2018
Work Experience
-
Alibaba Group.   Beijing, China
Research Intern. July 2021 - Dec. 2021
-
Kuaishou Technology.   Shenzhen, China
Machine Learning Engineer Intern. Apr. 2021 – June 2021
-
Microsoft.   Shanghai, China
Customer Service and Support (CSS) Security Intern. Jan. 2019 - Mar. 2019
Selected Awards
- Top 4% of Shopee Code League 2022 (Top 106 among 2,393 teams) 2022
- The First Prize of Shanghai Open Data Application (SODA) Competition (Top 3 among 198 teams) 2020
- Outstanding Graduate of Fudan University 2020
- Chun-Tsung Scholar, Research Endowment Funded by Nobel Laureate Dr. Tsung-Dao Lee 2020
- Second Class Scholarship for Outstanding Students, Fudan University (Top 10%) 2018 & 2019
- National Second Prize, China Undergraduate Mathematical Contest in Modeling 2018
- The Third Prize, Programming Contest of Fudan University 2018
- Third Class Scholarship for Outstanding Students, Fudan University 2018
- The Most Popular Team, Google Girl Hackthon Season III 2017
Personal
- I was born in 2000.
- I love musical, yoga and traveling. My favorite musical is Hamilton.
- I write for my own Wechat Subion. Search 达言不惭 in your Wechat! :)
- I really enjoy talking to different people. Don't hesitate to ping me if interested!


API Document
/oxauth
Overview
Any OpenID Client needs to register with the OpenID Provider to utilize OpenID Services, in this case register a user, and acquire a client ID and a shared secret.
/oxauth/register
registerPost
POST /oxauth/register
Registers new dynamic client in oxAuth.
URL
http://gluu.org/oxauth/register
Parameters
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| redirect_uris | Redirection URI values used by the Client. One of these registered Redirection URI values must exactly match the redirect_uri parameter value used in each Authorization Request |
| response_types | A list of the OAuth 2.0 response_type values that the Client is declaring that it will restrict itself to using. If omitted, the default is that the Client will use only the code Response Type. Allowed values are code, token, id_token |
| grant_types | A list of the OAuth 2.0 Grant Types that the Client is declaring that it will restrict itself to using. The Grant Type values used by OpenID Connect are:
|
| application_type | Kind of the application. The default, if omitted, is web. The defined values are native or web. Web Clients using the OAuth Implicit Grant Type must only register URLs using the https scheme as redirect_uris; they must not use localhost as the hostname. Native Clients must only register redirect_uris using custom URI schemes or URLs using the http: scheme with localhost as the hostname. |
| contacts | e-mail addresses of people responsible for this Client. |
| client_name | Name of the Client to be presented to the End-User. |
| logo_uri | URL that references a logo for the Client application. If present, the server displays this image to the End-User during approval. The value of this field must point to a valid image file. |
| client_uri | URL of the home page of the Client. The value of this field must point to a valid Web page. If present, the server displays this URL to the End-User in a followable fashion. |
| policy_uri | URL that the Relying Party Client provides to the End-User to read about the how the profile data will be used. The value of this field must point to a valid web page. The OpenID Provider displays this URL to the End-User if it is given. |
| tos_uri | URL that the Relying Party Client provides to the End-User to read about the Relying Party's terms of service. The value of this field must point to a valid web page. The OpenID Provider displays this URL to the End-User if it is given. |
| jwks_uri | URL for the Client's JSON Web Key Set (JWK) document. If the Client signs requests to the Server, it contains the signing key(s) the Server uses to validate signatures from the Client. The JWK Set may also contain the Client's encryption keys(s), which are used by the Server to encrypt responses to the Client. When both signing and encryption keys are made available, a use (Key Use) parameter value is required for all keys in the referenced JWK Set to indicate each key's intended usage. Although some algorithms allow the same key to be used for both signatures and encryption, doing so is not recommended, as it is less secure. The JWK x5c parameter MAY be used to provide X.509 representations of keys provided. When used, the bare key values must still be present and must match those in the certificate. |
| jwks | Client's JSON Web Key Set (JWK) document, passed by value. The semantics of the jwks parameter are the same as the jwks_uri parameter, other than that the JWK Set is passed by value, rather than by reference. This parameter is intended only to be used by Clients that, for some reason, are unable to use the jwks_uri parameter, for instance, by native applications that might not have a location to host the contents of the JWK Set. If a Client can use jwks_uri, it must not use jwks. One significant downside of jwks is that it does not enable key rotation (which jwks_uri does). The jwks_uri and jwks parameters must not be used together. |
| sector_identifier_uri | URL using the https scheme to be used in calculating Pseudonymous Identifiers by the OP. The URL references a file with a single JSON array of redirect_uri values. Providers that use pairwise sub (subject) values utilizes the sector_identifier_uri value provided in the Subject Identifier calculation for pairwise identifiers. |
| subject_type | subject_type requested for responses to this Client. The subject_types_supported Discovery parameter contains a list of the supported subject_type values for this server. Valid types include pairwise and public. |
| id_token_signed_response_alg | JWS alg algorithm (JWA) required for signing the ID Token issued to this Client. The value none must not be used as the ID Token alg value unless the Client uses only Response Types that return no ID Token from the Authorization Endpoint (such as when only using the Authorization Code Flow). The default, if omitted, is RS256. The public key for validating the signature is provided by retrieving the JWK Set referenced by the jwks_uri element from OpenID Connect Discovery. |
| id_token_encrypted_response_alg | JWE alg algorithm (JWA) required for encrypting the ID Token issued to this Client. If this is requested, the response will be signed then encrypted, with the result being a Nested JWT. The default, if omitted, is that no encryption is performed. |
| id_token_encrypted_response_enc | JWE enc algorithm (JWA) required for encrypting the ID Token issued to this Client. If id_token_encrypted_response_alg is specified, the default for this value is A128CBC-HS256. When id_token_encrypted_response_enc is included, id_token_encrypted_response_alg must also be provided. |
| userinfo_signed_response_alg | JWS alg algorithm (JWA) required for signing UserInfo Responses. If this is specified, the response will be JWT serialized, and signed using JWS. The default, if omitted, is for the UserInfo Response to return the Claims as a UTF-8 encoded JSON object using the application/json content-type. |
| userinfo_encrypted_response_alg | JWE alg algorithm (JWA) required for encrypting UserInfo Responses. If both signing and encryption are requested, the response will be signed then encrypted, with the result being a Nested JWT. The default, if omitted, is that no encryption is performed. |
| userinfo_encrypted_response_enc | JWE enc algorithm (JWA) required for encrypting UserInfo Responses. If userinfo_encrypted_response_alg is specified, the default for this value is A128CBC-HS256. When userinfo_encrypted_response_enc is included, userinfo_encrypted_response_alg must also be provided. |
| request_object_signing_alg | JWS alg algorithm (JWA) that must be used for signing Request Objects sent to the OP. All Request Objects from this Client are rejected, if not signed with this algorithm. This algorithm is used both when the Request Object is passed by value (using the request parameter) and when it is passed by reference (using the request_uri parameter). The value none may be used. The default, if omitted, is that any algorithm supported by the OP and the RP may be used. |
| request_object_encryption_alg | JWE alg algorithm (JWA) the RP is declaring that it may use for encrypting Request Objects sent to the OP. This parameter should be included when symmetric encryption will be used, since this signals to the OP that a client_secret value needs to be returned from which the symmetric key will be derived, that might not otherwise be returned. The RP may still use other supported encryption algorithms or send unencrypted Request Objects, even when this parameter is present. If both signing and encryption are requested, the Request Object will be signed then encrypted, with the result being a Nested JWT. The default, if omitted, is that the RP is not declaring whether it might encrypt any Request Objects. |
| request_object_encryption_enc | JWE enc algorithm (JWA) the RP is declaring that it may use for encrypting Request Objects sent to the OP. If request_object_encryption_alg is specified, the default for this value is A128CBC-HS256. When request_object_encryption_enc is included, request_object_encryption_alg must also be provided. |
| token_endpoint_auth_method | Requested Client Authentication method for the Token Endpoint. The options are client_secret_post, client_secret_basic, client_secret_jwt, private_key_jwt, and none. If omitted, the default is client_secret_basic, the HTTP Basic Authentication Scheme. |
| token_endpoint_auth_signing_alg | JWS alg algorithm (JWA) that must be used for signing the JWT used to authenticate the Client at the Token Endpoint for the private_key_jwt and client_secret_jwt authentication methods. All Token Requests using these authentication methods from this Client are rejected, if the JWT is not signed with this algorithm. The value none must not be used. The default, if omitted, is that any algorithm supported by the OP and the RP MAY be used. |
| default_max_age | Default Maximum Authentication Age. Specifies that the End-User must be actively authenticated if the End-User was authenticated longer ago than the specified number of seconds. The max_age request parameter overrides this default value. If omitted, no default Maximum Authentication Age is specified. |
| require_auth_time | Boolean value specifying whether the auth_time Claim in the ID Token is required. It is required when the value is true. (If this is false, the auth_time Claim can still be dynamically requested as an individual Claim for the ID Token using the claims request parameter) If omitted, the default value is false. |
| default_acr_values | Default requested Authentication Context Class Reference values. Array of strings that specifies the default acr values that the OP is being requested to use for processing requests from this Client, with the values appearing in order of preference. The Authentication Context Class satisfied by the authentication performed is returned as the acr Claim Value in the issued ID Token. The acr Claim is requested as a Voluntary Claim by this parameter. The acr_values_supported discovery element contains a list of the supported acr values supported by this server. Values specified in the acr_values request parameter or an individual acr Claim request override these default values. |
| initiate_login_uri | URI using the https scheme that a third party can use to initiate a login by the RP. The URI must accept requests via both GET and POST. The Client must understand the login_hint and iss parameters and should support the target_link_uri parameter. |
| request_uris | request_uri values that are pre-registered by the RP for use at the OP. The Servers cache the contents of the files referenced by these URIs and not retrieve them at the time they are used in a request. OPs can require that request_uri values used be pre-registered with the require_request_uri_registration discovery parameter. If the contents of the request file could ever change, these URI values should include the base64url encoded SHA-256 hash value of the file contents referenced by the URI as the value of the URI fragment. If the fragment value used for a URI changes, that signals the server that its cached value for that URI with the old fragment value is no longer valid. |
Response
Client Identificator or INUM, a client shared secret and the account expiration date in a [JSON[Response]]
Errors
| Status Code | Reason |
|---|---|
| 400 | invalid_request The request is missing a required parameter, includes an unsupported parameter or parameter value, repeats the same parameter, uses more than one method for including an access token, or is otherwise malformed. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 400 (Bad Request) status code. |
| 401 | invalid_token The access token provided is expired, revoked, malformed, or invalid for other reasons. The resource SHOULD respond with the HTTP 401 (Unauthorized) status code. The client MAY request a new access token and retry the protected resource request. |
| 403 | insufficient_scope The request requires higher privileges than provided by the access token. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 403 (Forbidden) status code and MAY include the "scope" attribute with the scope necessary to access the protected resource. |
| 302 | access_denies The request is denied by the authorization server. |
registerPut
PUT /oxauth/register
This operation updates the Client Metadata for a registered client.
URL
http://gluu.org/oxauth/register
Parameters
The request is sent as an HTTP POST
to the client registration endpoint as JSON with the parameters.
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| clientId | The unique client identifier usually INUM |
| authorization | The authorization for the client |
| httpRequest | The HTTP Request object |
| securityContext | Injectable interface providing access to security info |
Response
Client Identificator or INUM, a client shared secret and the account expiration date in a [JSON[Response]]
Errors
| Status Code | Reason |
|---|---|
| 400 | invalid_request The request is missing a required parameter, includes an unsupported parameter or parameter value, repeats the same parameter, uses more than one method for including an access token, or is otherwise malformed. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 400 (Bad Request) status code. |
| 401 | invalid_token The access token provided is expired, revoked, malformed, or invalid for other reasons. The resource SHOULD respond with the HTTP 401 (Unauthorized) status code. The client MAY request a new access token and retry the protected resource request. |
| 403 | insufficient_scope The request requires higher privileges than provided by the access token. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 403 (Forbidden) status code and MAY include the "scope" attribute with the scope necessary to access the protected resource. |
| 302 | access_denies The request is denied by the authorization server. |
registerGet
GET /oxauth/register
This operation retrieves the Client Metadata for a previously registered client.
URL
http://gluu.org/oxauth/register
Parameters
The request is sent as an HTTP POST
to the client registration endpoint as JSON with the parameters.
| Parameter | Description |
|---|---|
| clientId | The unique client identifier usually INUM |
| securityContext | injectable interface that provides access to security related info. |
Response
Client Identificator or INUM, a client shared secret and the account expiration date in a [JSON[Response]]
Errors
| Status Code | Reason |
|---|---|
| 400 | invalid_request The request is missing a required parameter, includes an unsupported parameter or parameter value, repeats the same parameter, uses more than one method for including an access token, or is otherwise malformed. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 400 (Bad Request) status code. |
| 401 | invalid_token The access token provided is expired, revoked, malformed, or invalid for other reasons. The resource SHOULD respond with the HTTP 401 (Unauthorized) status code. The client MAY request a new access token and retry the protected resource request. |
| 403 | insufficient_scope The request requires higher privileges than provided by the access token. The resource server SHOULD respond with the HTTP 403 (Forbidden) status code and MAY include the "scope" attribute with the scope necessary to access the protected resource. |
| 302 | access_denies The request is denied by the authorization server. |


{% extends 'cards/app.html' %} {% block content %} {% if language in person.speaks_languages.all %} You're silly! You already speak {{ language.name }}. But you could still learn it if you want, I guess. {% else %} You're not currently learning this language. Want to begin? {% endif %} {% csrf_token %} Start learning {{ language.name }} {% endblock %}
You're silly! You already speak {{ language.name }}. But you could still learn it if you want, I guess.
You're not currently learning this language. Want to begin?
{% endif %}