[02:09] <cc11rocks> I can
[03:55] <zebaszp> hahaha, I just found out about the jono_ soundboard :P
[03:55] <zebaszp> absolute must-have!
[03:56] <zebaszp> it's in situations like this I think it's shame I only have an iOS device
[04:01] <jono_> zebaszp, :-)
[05:35] <zebaszp> I'm
[05:35] <zebaszp> and
[08:53] <GuidoPallemanss> JoseeAntonioR: ubuntuonair.com needs to be updated :D
[17:57] <dearsergio> yes im here
[17:58] <JoseeAntonioR> dearsergio: the Q&A is now over
[21:27] <vinny> yes
[21:29] <vinny> i,m in leola pa usa
[21:30] <vinny> is ubuntu compatable tv tuners and what tv tuners


[12:36] <mup> Bug #1655638 opened: [UX Improvement] Disable all other functionality when the user is in the process of adding/creating an entity or has initiated an edit process <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1655638>
[14:42] <mup> Bug #1637570 opened: [2.1] Cavium ThunderX system with 128GigB of memory is reported as having 125.9GigB of memory in MAAS after commissioning <arm64> <hs-arm64> <oil> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1637570>
[14:48] <mup> Bug #1637570 changed: [2.1] Cavium ThunderX system with 128GigB of memory is reported as having 125.9GigB of memory in MAAS after commissioning <arm64> <hs-arm64> <oil> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1637570>
[14:49] <shubjero> Anyone have a guide on how to create a linux user during a maas deployment of a server? I'd like an additional user created during deployment in addition to the 'ubuntu' user
[15:00] <mup> Bug #1637570 opened: [2.1] Cavium ThunderX system with 128GigB of memory is reported as having 125.9GigB of memory in MAAS after commissioning <arm64> <hs-arm64> <oil> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1637570>
[16:02] <johnpants> Hello, any tips on why storage won't show up in MAAS?  After commissioning MAAS shows 0 disks and 0GB of storage.
[16:35] <pmatulis> johnpants, what is the nature of the node's underlying machine and its disk subsystem?
[16:44] <johnpants> Hi, it's an old HP desktop.  I was able to get it to identify the disk after adding a removable USB device and commissioning again.
[16:52] <pmatulis> johnpants, the original disk was identified only after adding a USB device?
[16:54] <johnpants> well, that's what I suspected.  BUT I just realized I made a bonehead mistake of selecting 'retain disk' when commissioning.  So, i think i was maybe not patient enough.  It's showing up now.
[17:42] <mup> Bug #1655721 opened: MAAS shouldn't update TGT config when there are no boot sources <MAAS:Triaged by ltrager> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1655721>
[18:07] <johnpants> I have another question.  I'm trying to build MAAS + OpenStack Autopilot.  MAAS is good to go, 4 nodes have been commissioned and are good to go, when I try to run the juju bootstrap sudo JUJU_BOOTSTRAP_TO=<hostname> openstack-install the status changes to deploying but nothing happens except the openstack installer ticks off seconds...if I reboot the node during the bootstrap 'something' gets deployed but it's not landscape.  Any id
[18:21] <pmatulis> johnpants, what docs are you following?
[18:22] <johnpants> https://www.ubuntu.com/download/cloud


[02:06] <handsome_feng> vorlon: Hi, I found that you created a branch 'ubuntukylin:drop-mouseemu' but propose for merging into  ~ubuntu-core-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/platform:groovy, I think you meant to merge into lp:~ubuntukylin-members/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntukylin ?
[02:20] <handsome_feng> vorlon: Applied this change, thanks!
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (groovy-proposed/main) [2:17.0.0~git2020091014.215a541bd4-0ubuntu1 => 2:17.0.0~rc2-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23]
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-22.23]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1006.6] (core, kernel)
[07:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1008.8] (core, kernel)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1006.6] (core)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1005.5] (core, kernel)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: borgbackup (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.14-1 => 1.1.14-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted borgbackup [sync] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.14-2]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libx11 (groovy-proposed/main) [2:1.6.10-3 => 2:1.6.12-1] (core, i386-whitelist, xorg) (sync)
[15:36] <RikMills> could someone please removed kdenlive from the unapproved queue? needs a fixup
[15:36] <RikMills> *remove
[15:38] <rbasak> I don't have permission on the Groovy queue, but note that you can upload without waiting for the reject
[15:38] <rbasak> (if you're waiting on that)
[15:38] <rbasak> Though it's still probably a good idea to get the reject done to avoid confusion
[15:44] <RikMills> rbasak: thanks. getting the new upload ready. just did not want the old accepted in the meantime
[19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yaru-theme (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.5 => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accountsservice (focal-proposed/main) [0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.1 => 0.6.55-0ubuntu12~20.04.2] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: discount (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.2.6-1 => 2.2.6-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[20:00] <rbalint> ^for LP: #1899213
[21:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: icecast2 (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.4.4-3 => 2.4.4-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[21:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted icecast2 [sync] (groovy-proposed) [2.4.4-4]
[21:49] <vorlon> handsome_feng: great, thank you!  not sure how I managed to target the wrong repo


[17:45] <flocculant> bluesabre: just a gentle prod to see if you remember there is an odd issue with parole and playing some files not others
[18:21] <flocculant> bluesabre: also - is this SRU material do you think? bug 1308105
[19:59] <electricerger> Hey guys, I'm looking to do some coding for an open source project does anybody have an active project that needs more devs?
[20:03] <ochosi> electricerger: hi, how about xfce?
[20:04] <electricerger> I've been stalking a few of those things, and chilling in xfce chat. I didn't get too many responses.
[20:04] <electricerger> It is #xfce right? not #xfce-dev or something?
[20:05] <ochosi> it's actually #xfce-dev
[20:05] <ochosi> can be quiet at times, so hanging out there alone may not get you anywhere
[20:05] <ochosi> but then again, you already got in touch with me, so.. ;)
[20:08] <ochosi> flocculant: hey, we may have another candidate for a thunar fix. it's looking pretty solid here in terms of not(!) crashing
[20:10] <electricerger> Sure. I do love thunar (I preferred it even when I was on other OS's).
[20:10] <electricerger> I'll join the chan now.
[20:11] <electricerger> I'm part of the xfce and xubuntu mailing list, but is there a specific way to join/stay on top of the thunar project?
[20:13] <krytarik> electricerger: I don't think he was referring to you with that, but another patch for it.
[20:14] <electricerger> Oh. Oh well. I'll just stalk the chan then.
[20:15] <krytarik> Otherwise yeah, mailing lists and these channels is basically it.
[20:16] <knome> also, which mailing lists?
[20:17] <knome> my advice would be to communicate with people and not feel let down if you don't instantly get a response... as that just happens with open source projects now and then :)
[20:19] <electricerger> Yeah, that's what I kind of expect in a hobby like this.
[20:22] <flocculant> ochosi: \o/
[20:23] <flocculant> and evening all - and hi electricerger :)
[20:24] <electricerger> Howdy
[20:27] <flocculant> ochosi: were those bugs I reported what you expected ?
[20:28] <ochosi> flocculant: haven't had time to review those yet tbh
[20:28] <flocculant> ok
[20:29] <ochosi> but the thunar patch may be interesting for you to try ot
[20:29] <ochosi> out
[20:32] <flocculant> ochosi: I can
[20:32] <ochosi> awesome!
[20:33] <ochosi> want some instructions?
[20:33] <flocculant> yea - I hate patches lol
[20:34] <flocculant> takes me ages to google fu ...
[20:35] <ochosi> http://dpaste.com/1A1XBQM
[20:35] <ochosi> this is all of it ^
[20:35] <ochosi> no need to install thunar
[20:35] <flocculant> okey doke
[20:36] <ochosi> great stuff
[20:36] <ochosi> if it works for you and we get at least one or two more testers i'm inclined to merge and push this to master
[20:36] <ochosi> and even do a patch release for thunar
[20:37] <flocculant> ochosi: ok - well I'll do that now - by tomorrow later I'll have had cause to do enough to trigger a crash normally
[20:37] <flocculant> if that even makes sense ...
[20:37] <ochosi> well if you wanna do that, then you better install it
[20:37] <ochosi> these instructions are only for testing for a limited amount of time (until you close thunar again)
[20:37] <flocculant> oh right
[20:37] <ochosi> so basically finish it up with a "sudo make install"
[20:38] <ochosi> fwiw the namespace is different anyway, so a "sudo make uninstall" let's you go back to 'ol thunar
[20:38] <flocculant> well I'm fine with running 'whatever' version of things to test properly
[20:38]  * flocculant notes the proliferation of xfce folders on desktop this cycle :D
[20:40] <ochosi> :)
[20:40] <ochosi> you're really helping a lot, that much i can say
[20:40] <flocculant> good
[20:41] <flocculant> ok - all installed - give me some time to kill it :)
[20:43] <knome> has your emails gone to spam or has nobody in the team replied to me on the t-shirt issue?
[20:45] <flocculant> not seen it
[20:45] <knome> so maybe it was my mail that went to spam
[20:45] <flocculant> oh yes I have
[20:45] <knome> fwiw, it was off-list on purpose
[20:45] <flocculant> sorry for the mistake
[20:45] <knome> :)
[20:45] <knome> no worries
[20:46] <flocculant> I didn't reply - cos no-one would wear it other than me - and I'm definitely not woman :)
[20:47] <knome> yep
[20:47] <knome> that was the hoped-for action if you didn't need one :P
[20:48] <flocculant> :)
[20:50] <flocculant> ochosi: can always do a call to arms to testers to test the thunar thing if you feel it useful
[20:58] <flocculant> meh - that giot thunar is screwing up pkexec one :p
[21:10] <flocculant> fixed that
[21:11] <krytarik> Btw: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2017-January/004018.html [16.04.2 delayed until Feb 9 for HWE issues]
[21:12] <flocculant> krytarik: thanks - was just going to fwd the mail to us
[21:12] <krytarik> Hurr. :D
[21:15] <ochosi> knome: i didn't reply because we had talked already and my stance was that i take one if nobody else wants it. consequently i didn't want to take a front-row seat and didnt reply
[21:15] <knome> lol, ok
[21:30] <flocculant> knome: if we could tweet and stuff that thunar patch testing that'd be super :D
[21:32] <flocculant> akxwi-dave: some thunar testing is afoot :)
[21:32] <knome> we can
[21:32] <knome> but i need pleia2 for "stuff"
[21:32] <flocculant> :)
[21:36] <ochosi> flocculant: btw i take it from your comments so far that the taskman thing i sent you worked fine for you?
[21:36] <flocculant> ochosi: yea - as you said icon - but other than that it appears to be fine
[21:37] <ochosi> ok cool
[21:37] <ochosi> then i'll prepare the release asap
[21:37] <flocculant> don't really use it much so never noticed any bugs
[21:37] <ochosi> :]
[21:37] <ochosi> well if it generally works that's something alredy
[21:37] <ochosi> already
[21:38] <flocculant> :)