[07:04] <YamakasY> morning anyone running percona 5.6 ? I have dependency issues with it
[09:19] <lordievader> Good morning.
[10:38] <ochoroch> lordievader: Good Morning ...
[10:38] <lordievader> o/
[10:38] <ochoroch> ;-) ...
[10:46] <rbasak> kickinz1: looking at Docker now. Can I see the format-patch output or your git tree please? Is this up-to-date on docker-dev?
[10:47] <kickinz1> rbasak, I think so let me check
[11:16] <kickinz1> rbasak, docker-dev up-to-date
[11:42] <LeMike> Hello . What do you do when a message comes in, that you send packages to a arbitrary control server? They only give you the source IP which is the firewall. That is like searching the needle in a haystack.
[12:57] <lucidguy> Putting together an NFS server.  12x 6TB disks via raid controller/raid60.  XFS filessytem.  Will only serve as an NFS server, do I bother with anyont more then 8GB of ram?
[13:00] <OpenTokix> lucidguy: That is more depended on the amount of clients
[13:01] <lucidguy> Probably around 60 clients
[13:01] <OpenTokix> Then 8G should be more then enough - however, the more ram you have - the more will get cached in ram
[13:01] <OpenTokix> will speed up reads
[13:02] <OpenTokix> I guess it wil be on 1Gbps?
[13:02] <lucidguy> Yes.
[13:04] <OpenTokix> more ram is always more ram for cache, but I think 8G will be sufficien t
[13:10] <lucidguy> I agree
[13:20] <patdk-wk> I would be more concerned about writes to the raid60
[13:20] <patdk-wk> and our stripe size
[13:21] <patdk-wk> to determine how much ram you need, overtop of your working set size
[13:23] <rbasak> kickinz1: failed to build on powerpc: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/202757945/buildlog_ubuntu-vivid-powerpc.docker.io_1.5.0~dfsg1-1ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[13:23] <rbasak> I don't know if we care or not.
[13:25] <kickinz1> rbasak: I don't know either.
[13:36] <hallyn> stgraber: lxc in vivid still needs commit 89a4ec737e97fdf2856fda94b816875e98155c82
[14:00] <excalibr> Upstart question again, why is it job with script stanza only eventually goes into stop/waiting state after being started?
[14:01] <excalibr> while with pre/post-start, it remains in start/running and block further start invocation once started
[14:54] <stgraber> hallyn: did you talk to wgrant? he pinged me about that very issue last night :)
[14:54] <stgraber> hallyn: anyway, I plan on tagging 1.1.2 today which will include this
[14:58] <Voyage> HI
[15:32] <Ameurux> hello
[15:33] <hallyn> stgraber: no, i was just checking to see if my running-in-container update fully fixed nested lxc
[15:34] <hallyn> excellent, thx
[15:39] <strikov> rbasak: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/trusty/+source/openldap/+bug/1103353
[15:39] <strikov> rbasak: won't fix it please
[15:40] <strikov> rbasak: issues mention at #19 seems to happen only when you install this package over your own one built against openssl not gnutls
[15:40] <strikov> rbasak: which means that my point at #18 is still valid
[15:43] <rbasak> strikov: done
[15:43] <strikov> rbasak: tnx
[15:43] <strikov> rbasak: i'll put a final note there in a minute
[15:45] <strikov> rbasak: ah, you put one already, thanks!
[15:45] <rbasak> :)
[16:46] <lucidguy> Raid question.  12 disk raid10 array.  Technically I can lose a total of 6 disks and the array will stay online.  What if I loose two disks of the same pair?   (where somemodule is any module the community wants)
[17:00] <teward> (it'd apply to my ppas project where I do bugtracking on the staging PPAs, the nginx project on LP, and the Ubuntu package)
[17:02] <teward> the only reason I asked is because I've seen this request a thousand times in my email or in Debian, and want a catchall down here that says Debian should include it first, or at least get a voice
[17:02] <teward> (same idea of including a new package somewhere, in that it's easier to get it into Ubuntu via Debian)
[17:10] <rbasak> teward: sounds like you actually want an FAQ entry or template standard response instead of a bug itself?
[17:11] <rbasak> teward: I don't think anybody will object if you manage nginx bugs how you please though. We appreciate that you do look after them.
[17:11] <gQuigs> is there a way to get changelogs from the ubuntu cloud archive without installing it?  (like packages.ubuntu.com or launchpad ppas)
[17:13] <teward> rbasak: considering the number of feature reqs in Debian, yes.
[17:13] <teward> rbasak: I should set up a wiki page for NGINX xD
[17:13] <rbasak> gQuigs: I think they're managed in bzr somewhere? If so you could find that in a browser somewhere. I don't know where that might be though. Does Vcs-Browser point to anything on an installed package?
[17:14] <teward> rbasak: the big idea here is we don't want to *increase* the delta between debian and Ubuntu, so... since i see the requests *way* too often, thought I'd preempt em.
[17:16] <teward> rbasak: done though :)
[18:50] <mpanetta> Hey peeps, quick question.  My google foo has failed me on this one, so hopefully someone can help...
[18:50] <mpanetta> I have a question that google is failing me on...  How do I have 2 separate DHCP configured interfaces (eth0, eth1) and only set the resolv.conf entries for eth0?
[18:50] <mpanetta> eth1 keeps overwriting resolv.conf when it comes up, with info that is not valid :(
[18:51] <sarnold> mpanetta: maybe uninstall resolvconf and manage it yourself?
[18:52] <mpanetta> I don't seem to have resolveconf installed.  At least the dir does not exist in /etc
[18:53] <concord> Just upgraded a VM server to v15.04 and VMware tools doesn't seem to like systemd.  Install is failing.  Any tricks?
[18:53] <sarnold> mpanetta: check dpkg -l resolvconf
[18:53] <mpanetta> sarnold: says un, so not installed
[18:54] <sarnold> mpanetta: aha
[18:55] <mpanetta> hmm, I think dhclient may be editing it for me?
[18:55] <mpanetta> I could chatrr it +i I suppose
[18:55] <mpanetta> er chattr
[18:55] <mpanetta> Seems kinda like a hack tho
[18:56] <teward> in theory you could set dns-nameservers for both interfaces in /etc/network/interfaces to be the DNS servers you want... but, no guarantee.
[18:56] <teward> i'd test but i have to finish updating my VM labs :p
[18:57] <mpanetta> teward: Yeah, it seems to ignore that
[18:57] <sarnold> there may be a way in /etc/network/services to set what you like.. I've never had to fight this one though, I'm running short o nideas fast
[18:57] <teward> mpanetta: which release is this
[18:57] <teward> 14.04? etc.
[18:58] <mpanetta> I've read that I can disable the dhclient from requesting that info, maybe that will help...
[18:58] <mpanetta> teward: Yes 14.04
[19:00] <sarnold> I know that the protocol allows it, whether the config files make it easy is another matter :)
[19:00] <mpanetta> Actually let me try that...
[19:00] <mpanetta> sarnold: We are about to find out ;)
[19:00] <mdeslaur> My guess would be to list the specific interfaces in their own section in /etc/dhcp/dhclient.conf
[19:01] <mdeslaur> and not request  domain-name-servers for the interface you don't want
[19:01] <concord> Ubuntu server has switched to systemd, no?  Now I'm unable to install vmware-tools.  Getting the following error: "initctl: Unable to connect to Upstart: Failed to connect to socket /com/ubuntu/upstart: Connection refused"  Any help?
[19:01] <mdeslaur> or, alternatively, just add a global "prepend domain-name-servers <IP_ADDRESS>;" in there
[19:02] <mpanetta> Woop ok removing dns-servers and so forth from the request line in dhclient.conf fixed it
[19:02] <sarnold> concord: please file a bug against the vmware-tools package, add the systemd-boot tag to the bug
[19:02] <mpanetta> teward: sarnold mdeslaur: thanks for the help!
[19:03] <concord> sarnold: this is a package from vmware, not an ubuntu package
[19:03] <concord> I'm trying to install in server v.15.04
[19:03] <sarnold> concord: hunh, I thought it was in our archive these days
[19:03] <concord> Yea?
[19:03] <concord> Hmmmmm
[19:04] <sarnold> concord: Y
[19:04] <sarnold> concord: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/open-vm-tools
[19:05] <concord> sarnold: I will give that a try, this is vSphere 5.0.0, shouldn't matter?
[19:05] <sarnold> concord: sorry, no idea there
[19:05] <concord> sarnold: thank you!
[19:06] <sarnold> concord: if it doesn't work out and vmware doesn't get around to fixing it soon enough, I think upstart will still be available as a fallback https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SystemdForUpstartUsers#Switching_init_systems
[19:08] <teward> sarnold: concord: vmware-tools i think won't build under the later kernels in 14.10 and later
[19:08] <teward> although they updated vmware-tools lately from the vmware tools ISO, and I haven't tested since
[19:08] <teward> open-vm-tools should work for most of the functions otherwise though
[19:32] <concord> teward: sarnold: I have installed the package and vCenter reports that HA is up and running, although it does clearly say that vmware tools are "3rd-Party/Independent" and not genuine VMware so I'm guessing support is out the window. But hey ... that's what you guys are for!
[19:32] <concord> :)
[19:35] <sarnold> concord: interesting, they asked for the packages to be moved to main..