[07:36] <Mirv> please check https://is.gd/iqJODS (LP bug search) - the latest 18.04 kernel is likely faulty, I've another person on the line who has similar symptoms with her laptop
[07:36] <Mirv> (the first three bugs)
[12:28] <xypron> A lot of autopkgtest fail with ProxyError('Cannot connect to proxy.', OSError('Tunnel connection failed: 403 Forbidden')) Who can fix this?
[12:30] <xypron> Here is an example<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[12:36] <jbicha> xypron: maybe it will work if you retry those autopkgtests https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2022/05/09/%23ubuntu-release.html#t12:32
[13:26] <xypron> jbicha: thanks for the link. Just must find somebody with the right authorizations.


[05:00] <these_eyes> Zero hour.
[05:03] <these_eyes> Core temperature high. Is there a boot time kernel param to force powersave cpufreq?
[05:04] <these_eyes> New initscrips and rc.local echos do not work.
[05:18] <these_eyes> ZagfeO New initscrips and rc.local echos do not work.
[05:38] <these_eyes> Trippeh New initscrips and rc.local echos do not work.
[06:30] <these_eyes> Zyga New initscrips and rc.local echos do not work.
[06:30] <these_eyes> Lone i?
[07:26] <these_eyes> Ara New initscrips and rc.local echos do not work.
[07:32] <zyga> these_eyes: hey, what's up?
[07:34] <these_eyes> Hello zyga.
[07:34] <these_eyes> Remodeling.
[07:36] <these_eyes> The host is overheating and attempts to make powersave frequency governor default have not been effective.
[07:39] <these_eyes> So far I've made init scripts using the default on demand script and subbing in powersave. Also adding the echo to the appropriate sys settings file in rc.local. Neither show effect. However the echo powersave works when run manually.
[07:45] <zyga> these_eyes: sorry, can you work with ara
[07:45] <zyga> I cannot spare cycles now
[07:46] <ara> these_eyes, what system are you running? and what version of Ubuntu?
[07:47] <ara> these_eyes, I would recommend you to file a bug using "ubuntu-bug linux". That will upload all the required logs and the ubuntu kernel team will be able to investigate it
[07:48] <these_eyes> I expect it to enter the cpu into powersave mode as it does when used manually from command line the settings look fragmented as though the configuration is done with some gui using more complicated methods some combination of things that interact with init scripts so trying rc.local is a simple alternative and even it doesn't work.
[07:50] <these_eyes> Work with ara sure do you know where ara come from? I have a guess.
[07:51] <these_eyes> Memtest is showing problems on another machine running an older kernel.
[07:52] <these_eyes> So ara comes in.
[07:52] <ara> these_eyes, sorry?
[07:53] <these_eyes> Ara sorry for what?
[07:53] <ara> these_eyes, I mean, sorry as I don't understand what you are saying :)
[07:54] <these_eyes> It looks intentional. Sorry is usually not a response for intentional aras.
[07:57] <these_eyes> I notice the memory tests as bad but is not bad memory I can test it using another memtest and check but while that is happening I want the other machine to run cooler.
[07:57] <these_eyes> Find out how to set powersave as default cpufreq.
[08:04] <these_eyes> Ok ara?
[08:06] <xianghui> Hello, does anyone know how to do 'modprobe uio' on ubuntu trusty?
[08:06] <apw> these_eyes, it should also switch to powersave about 20s after boot
[08:07] <apw> these_eyes, we default to performance to improve boot speed
[08:08] <xianghui> or I don't need to modprobe uio, it's already in kernel 3.13~ ?
[08:12] <apw> debian.master/config/config.common.ubuntu:CONFIG_UIO=m
[08:12] <apw> looks to be a module
[08:14] <xianghui> apw: thx thx
[08:16] <smb> xianghui, might be uio-pci-generic you are looking for
[08:19] <xianghui> smb: hmm, didn't find uio-pci-generic, seems it's in kernel 3.13.0-63-generic default, thx.
[11:14] <data> Hi, I was wondering if this fix made it into any release kernel yet:
[11:14] <data> http://bitsup.blogspot.ch/2015/09/thanks-google-tcp-team-for-open-source.html
[11:18] <apw> data, i know it is applied but not uploaded for wily, and as it is dave.miller i would expect it to go to stables is possible
[11:19] <data> ok great. we have some benchmarks where we always assumed that it was our wonky code, but I am putting some hope into this ;) Where can I find information like this?
[11:24] <apw> data, information like what ?
[11:25] <data> which patches are applied?
[11:45] <apw> data, our git repositories are the ultimate definition of waht is applied
[13:17] <caribou> apw: Would you have a chance to review the proposal for a fix for LP: #1496317 ?
[13:18] <caribou> apw: or maybe I can ask to someone in the server team. But you already know the context
[15:06] <apw> caribou, cna do, do chase me if i don't today
[15:06] <caribou> apw: debdiff is in the patch. I'll ping you by tomorrow morning if I don't hear anything
[15:07] <caribou> apw: thanks!
[15:42] <bjf> query sconklin
[16:58] <leitao> arges, hi there.
[16:59] <leitao> arges, I understand that 1487085 is queued for this upcoming SRU for 3.19, right?
[17:01] <rtg> leitao, yup, should be out in the next day or so
[17:02] <rtg> by "out", I mean promoted to -updates
[17:02] <arges> leitao: what rtg said : )
[17:02] <leitao> rtg, cool. And the SRu cycle is a traditional 3 weeks cycle, right?
[17:03] <rtg> leitao, generally. The stable team (in the form of bjf) publishes a schedule about every three weeks.
[17:03] <arges> leitao: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-sru-announce this list announces cycle dates, and yes typically it is 3 week intervals
[17:03] <leitao> good. Thank you guys!


[06:11] <blkperl> so it appears the nvidia kernel module no longer works (fully updated alpha 2)
[08:24] <evfool> ping brendand
[08:30] <brendand> pong evfool
[08:32] <evfool> about bug 329441 ... I just have found that there is  a context menu with check/uncheck all in update-manager, maybe the bug should be updated to be about the discoverability of these?
[08:32] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 329441 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "Need to have select all and unselect all option when asking for installing updates (heat: 4)" [Wishlist,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/329441
[08:32] <evfool> brendand^
[08:37] <mvo> evfool: yeah, that makes sense
[08:41] <evfool> mvo: also, the Check all/Uncheck all maybe should be updated to select/unselect all, as there is a Check button
[08:41] <evfool> mvo: and Check all and Check are not related at all... one checks for updates, the other selects all
[08:42] <evfool> although it's hard to find a place to expose select/unselect all without cluttering the UI
[08:50] <mvo> evfool: hm, interessting point. I guess select make indeed more sense than check
[08:51] <evfool> mvo: anyway I guess it should be updated before translations freeze, even if the discoverability is not changed at all
[08:51] <mvo> agreed
[08:51] <evfool> mvo: I'll do it this week, along with some other string changes and bugfixes
[08:53] <mvo> great, thanks. I will merge it right away
[08:59] <brendand> evfool - on my system it says 'Tick All' and 'Untick All'. Are you guys translating from German?
[09:00] <brendand> or maybe using US English?
[09:00] <evfool> brendand: US English
[09:00] <brendand> huh, interesting
[09:01] <brendand> select is probably more widely translatable
[10:44] <brendand> jibel - i need your help with a lightdm bug
[10:44] <brendand> jibel - there are so many reports it's getting lost amongst them all
[10:45] <jibel> brendand, how can I help ?
[10:45] <brendand> you need to assign the bug to a team
[10:45] <brendand> (i'm not sure can i do that)
[10:46] <brendand> it's a tiny bit ridiculous that the only confirmed, non-dupe of this bug is Importance - Medium and not assigned
[10:47] <brendand> i had set it to critical but somehow that one got marked as a duplicate and the 'master' bug is not even confirmed
[10:47] <brendand> no idea how that happened
[10:47] <brendand> i think maybe the retracer did it
[10:48] <brendand> this is the master bug at the moment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/811222
[10:48] <ubot4> brendand: Error: Bug #811222 is private.
[10:48] <brendand> oh, it needs to be unprivated
[10:49] <brendand> let me check the Core Dump
[10:49] <jibel> it already known and the master is critical IIRC
[10:49] <jibel> it/it is
[10:50] <brendand> where is it?
[10:51] <brendand> there was this one: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/+bug/809890
[10:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 809890 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3() (dup-of: 811222)" [Critical,Confirmed]
[10:51] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 811222 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() (affects: 14) (dups: 8) (heat: 168)" [Medium,New]
[10:54] <brendand> jibel - if there is a proper bug for this issue can you let me know which one it is?
[10:55] <jibel> urgh, the apport-duplicate finder hit again. Let me fix this
[10:55] <jibel> the original issue was 809890
[10:59] <jibel> brendand, I changed the order. Master is now 809890, there is a proposition of patch in it
[10:59] <jibel> and targeted to oneiric so it won't fall off radar
[11:00] <brendand> jibel - cool. hopefully one of the lightdm maintainers will look at it soon
[11:01] <brendand> jibel - not too sure the patch is correct, might fix the immediate problem but sounds like it could break other stuff.
[11:02] <brendand> now, i have a couple of pretty serious bugs i need to file myself...
[11:02] <brendand> thanks jibel
[12:44] <brendand> anyone else having problems with suspend all of a sudden in Oneiric?
[12:44] <brendand> i would have assumed hardware specific kernel regression but using 3.0.4 for example doesn't help
[12:44] <brendand> basically my system just won't suspend
[12:44] <yofel> I do, as in bug 809729
[12:44] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 809729 in linux (Ubuntu) "[oneiric] kernel 3.0.0-4 fails to suspend on a eeePC 1000H (affects: 1) (heat: 655)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/809729
[12:45] <brendand> yofel - strange, i only got it yesterday and i'm sure i was on 3.0.4 for a while (3.0.5 even)
[12:45] <brendand> maybe i didn't suspend my system after updating to 3.0.4???
[12:46] <brendand> i guess only i can answer that, but it seems unlikely
[12:46] <yofel> haven't tried -5 yet actually, I'll do that later
[12:46] <yofel> anything in dmesg?
[12:46] <brendand> i can't switch vt's either
[12:56] <brendand> yofel - i also lose my network after suspending :( ...
[12:57] <yofel> that I can't confirm, in my case the system simply stuck for ~20s and came up again since it couldn't suspend
[12:57] <yofel> the kernel or syslog should have some information about the network
[13:09] <brendand> yofel - are you able to shutdown cleanly after failure to suspend?
[13:09] <yofel> yes
[13:10] <brendand> sounds a bit different from what i have
[13:10] <brendand> i'm running 3.0.3 now, going to try it and see what happens
[13:20] <brendand> pedro_ - any bug day this week?
[13:22] <pedro_> brendand, yes, just created the page, banshee is the target
[13:22] <pedro_> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110721
[13:23] <pedro_> kamusin is going to send the announcement shortly
[13:39] <kamusin> announcement sent pedro_
[13:40] <pedro_> kamusin, awesome, thanks!
[16:03] <bdmurray> micahg: my math was bad its about 5% of bugs
[16:08] <micahg> bdmurray: ok, BTW, we're down to ~92k from ~97k, so you're doing some good work, but as was discussed on -devel the other night, open bugs aren't the issue as much as weeding out non-bugs
[16:10] <bdmurray> micahg: right I'm cleaning up lots of apport-package duplicates / invalid bugs and stopping them from coming in
[16:10]  * micahg hugs bdmurray
[16:12]  * bdmurray presents http://status.qa.ubuntu.com/qapkgstatus/dpkg as an example
[16:45] <kamusin> something is happening with lightdm in the latest Oneiric daily image right? it doesn't ask for the password
[16:46] <jibel> kamusin, you mean you have only the background when you select a user ?
[16:47] <kamusin> I was able to select my username and after click on it seems like he wants to start the session immediately  without ask for the password
[16:48] <charlie-tca> It starts your session?
[16:48] <jibel> kamusin, but does the session start or nothing happens ?
[16:48] <charlie-tca> mine give a blank wallpaper
[16:48] <kamusin> nope, nothing happens
[16:48] <jibel> kamusin, bug 809890
[16:48] <charlie-tca> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/811909
[16:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 809890 in lightdm (Ubuntu Oneiric) (and 1 other project) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in __strcmp_ssse3() (affects: 15) (dups: 9) (heat: 198)" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/809890
[16:48] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 811909 in lightdm (Ubuntu) "lightdm-example-gtk-greeter crashed with SIGSEGV in _start() (affects: 9) (dups: 5) (heat: 72)" [Medium,Confirmed]
[16:49] <charlie-tca> hm, maybe mine should be critical too?
[16:49] <kamusin> excelent, thank you guys
[16:54] <kamusin> I wish they could fix this issue soon and even better before the bugday begins heh
[16:58] <pedro_> QA Meeting at #ubuntu-meeting in ~2 mins!
[18:27] <psusi> bug reports against PPAs are not accepted as a rule, right?  I don't see a standard response for that.
[18:29] <charlie-tca> I believe it stems from the fact that bug reports are only accepted against current packages in repositories, and if the package is in a PPA, it is not currently in the repository
[18:29] <psusi> hrm... might need to add a standard response for this...
[18:30] <charlie-tca> We don't accept them against source forge or any other thing outside the repositories, either
[18:31] <charlie-tca> We already have a standard response - https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Packages_not_provided_by_Ubuntu
[18:31] <psusi> ahh, I was searching for PPA and coming up empty handed
[19:57] <jibel> RedSingularity, about bug 797673, you were right with libdrm-nouveau. There is a dependency tree that makes the upgrader remove upstart, which hopefully it refuses.
[19:57] <jibel> My opinion is to move it to answers.lp.net
[19:57] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 797673 in update-manager (Ubuntu) "upgrade from Ubuntu 10.10 to 11.0.4 64bit is halted (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Invalid] https://launchpad.net/bugs/797673
[20:37] <brendand> nagging question - is it the duty or the right of bug-control to assign bugs to teams?
[20:38] <greg-g> brendand: that depends on the team and their policies
[20:39] <greg-g> in general, it isn't a good idea to assign people work without asking
[20:40] <brendand> well, of course not to individuals ;)
[20:42] <yofel> well, usually you assign bugs to the person that's working on it (which is usually done by him/herself)
[20:42] <charlie-tca> brendand: as a general ru8le, bug-control does not assign bugs to teams or people
[20:42] <yofel> if a team has a policy that bugs should get assigned to them then you do so
[20:42] <yofel> but I don't know of one currently now that the desktop team doesn't do that anymore
[20:43] <bdmurray> brendand: is there a specific bug you are concerned about?
[20:43] <brendand> bdmurray - no, it's a general question.
[20:43] <bdmurray> then no ;-)
[20:43] <bdmurray> why would you want to assign it to a team?
[20:44] <yofel> correction: bugs are only assigned to people that are working on _fixing_ them, not working on them in general
[20:47] <brendand> it's a very usual part of the bug management process to assign bugs to either a team or a individual within the team whose job it is to manage them on behalf of the team
[20:51] <brendand> i'm only asking if this is a role of ubuntu-bug-control
[20:53] <yofel> we currently don't do that so: No. But if you wanted to do that you would need bug control permissions.
[20:57] <brendand> so we *can* but shouldn't


[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-abadojack-whatlanggo [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-google-go-pkcs11 [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmsh [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmsh [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[05:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmsh [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[06:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmsh [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [1.22.0-1] (no packageset)
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gmsh [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11.1+ds1-1] (no packageset)
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmsh [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [4.11.1+ds1-1]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmsh [s390x] (noble-proposed) [4.11.1+ds1-1]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmsh [arm64] (noble-proposed) [4.11.1+ds1-1]
[06:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmsh [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [4.11.1+ds1-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gmsh [armhf] (noble-proposed) [4.11.1+ds1-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-google-go-pkcs11 [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.3.0+dfsg-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-abadojack-whatlanggo [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cowsql-go-cowsql [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.22.0-1]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocksdb [amd64] (noble-proposed/universe) [8.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocksdb [armhf] (noble-proposed/universe) [8.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocksdb [arm64] (noble-proposed/universe) [8.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocksdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/universe) [8.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rocksdb [s390x] (noble-proposed/universe) [8.9.1-2] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [arm64] (noble-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [armhf] (noble-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [s390x] (noble-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rocksdb [amd64] (noble-proposed) [8.9.1-2]
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-uuhelp-parser [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.23-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-uuhelp-parser [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.23-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-uuhelp-parser [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.23-1] (no packageset)
[23:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-uuhelp-parser [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.0.23-1] (no packageset)
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-uuhelp-parser [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.23-1]
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-uuhelp-parser [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.0.23-1]
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-uuhelp-parser [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.0.23-1]
[23:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-uuhelp-parser [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.0.23-1]


[00:09] <BUGabundo> eheh
[00:09] <BUGabundo> bug 403248
[00:09] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 403248 in gnome-power-manager "DIM will dim my screen even when not idle" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/403248
[00:09] <BUGabundo> this guy must not know me
[00:09] <BUGabundo> thanking me for using apport
[00:09] <BUGabundo> errr *all* my bugs for the last to cycles have been filed with it
[00:22] <caa> I think he was thanking you beacuse you were the first to use apport for that package
[00:23] <BUGabundo> I guess
[00:23] <BUGabundo> but I've filed GPM bugs before with apport
[00:23] <yofel> hm, I guess since you were the first that used the new apport hook for g-p-m
[00:25] <BUGabundo> yep
[00:25] <BUGabundo> seems like it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> maybe he wrote it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> and now is happy some one used it
[00:25] <BUGabundo> eheh
[00:25] <caa> hehe
[00:25] <caa> probably
[00:26] <BUGabundo> not even sure who _he_ is
[00:26]  * BUGabundo slowly scroll room members list
[00:50] <yofel> anybody an idea about my question?
[00:50] <yofel> 00:23:28 < yofel> hm, what is one supposed to do with an old bug report about a package that was only released in hardy and intrepid?
[00:51] <lifeless> if the package has been removed (not renamed), and its not something we'd do an RC update for, then close it wontfix
[00:51] <lifeless> because we wont ;P
[00:55] <yofel> lifeless: it's bug 106396 - I can't check it since the package doesn't exist in jauny and karmic and upstream is unreachable
[00:55] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 106396 in bmpx "bmpx close unexpectedly" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/106396
[00:56] <micahg> yofel: https://edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bmpx
[00:56] <micahg> Deleted        in        jaunty-release                        on 2009-03-07        (Reason:          #337659, unmaintained, removed from Debian)
[00:57] <yofel> micahg: thx, can you set the bug to wontfix then?
[00:58] <micahg> sure
[00:58] <micahg> well
[00:59] <micahg> there's nothing we can do, right?
[01:01] <yofel> well, *I* don't know how to fix the bug, nor do I know where to search for it, and since upstream can't be reached and the package is officially unmaintained I don't know who could do something about it
[01:03] <micahg> done
[01:04] <yofel> micahg: thank you
[01:04]  * BUGabundo $ sle -ep; echo load /dev/urandom /dev/eyes
[01:04] <micahg> I should have checked with motu first
[01:04]  * micahg is checking now
[01:07] <hggdh> micahg, this is correct, as lifeless stated.
[01:56] <micahg> hggdh: ok, is that because of the error or becuase the package was removed?
[01:56] <micahg> ubuntu-motu seemed to say that we would do SRUs if it's worthy
[04:36] <micahg> ping hggdh
[05:53] <bcurtiswx> how late it is
[05:53] <bcurtiswx> wow
[05:57] <bcurtiswx> Fantasie in D minor, i was in a good mood, stupid minor chords :P
[07:12] <thekorn> good morning bugsquad
[09:59] <LimCore> hi, can you please confirm https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/totem/+bug/403935
[09:59] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 403935 in totem "Totem, VLC, kaffeine - pauses playback of movie, when switching screen (i.e. VT-9)" [Undecided,New]
[11:09] <LimCore> all sound stop when I switch between users.  report this bug against what package?
[11:15] <LimCore> ok never mind it was dupe of 309724
[11:21] <LimCore> I guess. Reopened it - https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pulseaudio/+bug/309724   please test does this happens for you also
[11:21] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 309724 in pulseaudio "no sound after fast switching between logged in users" [Low,Confirmed]
[11:35]  * LimCore wonders why it is such a slowe day today
[14:34] <lexual> I'm trying to close a bug, and can't see how. Am I missing something, or do I need some extra permissions?
[14:49] <lfaraone> Lupine: well, what would the resolution be?
[14:49] <lfaraone> Lupine: oops, wrong nick.,
[14:49] <Lupine> np :)
[16:02] <pedro_> thekorn, are you around?
[16:03] <pedro_> grgr
[16:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, i'm getting the following traceback while trying to add a comment to a report with python-launchpad-bugs: http://paste.ubuntu.com/230623/
[16:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, script is available here: http://paste.ubuntu.com/230624/
[17:04] <bdmurray> pedro_: python-launchpad-bugs isn't fully up to date with the all the launchpad changes.  I'd use launchpadlib if I were you.  If you need some help writing one let me know.
[17:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, that's what i thought...
[17:05] <pedro_> bdmurray, i'm migrating the scripts to launchpadlib now, found good examples at the ubuntu-qa-tools package
[17:06] <bdmurray> pedro_: yes, uncheck-patch-comment covers what you are looking for
[17:07] <bdmurray> pedro_: about like this http://paste.ubuntu.com/230734/
[17:08] <pedro_> bdmurray, yeap, i was looking into exactly that file
[17:09] <bdmurray> pedro_: well, great!
[17:24] <bneff> Trying to install karmic alpha 3, but screen goes black after a few mins
[17:24] <bneff> anyone had this?
[17:28] <bneff> The installer gets to Starting Ubiquity,...now it has a bunch of vertical lines
[17:37] <yofel> bneff: this channel is for help on triaging bugs, for karmic support please use #ubuntu+1. Thanks.
[17:38] <bneff> cool thx
[18:25] <james_w> bdmurray: when did you hit that lplib problem?
[18:26] <bdmurray> james_w: yesterday
[18:26] <james_w> I've got some of the same error
[18:26] <james_w> my guess is that the update caused it to spit out a bad file
[18:27] <james_w> and it sounds like that was cached
[18:27] <bdmurray> yes, mine was probably running during the upgrade
[21:11] <BUGabundo> ola
[21:55] <hggdh> ola BUGabundo
[21:56] <BUGabundo> atao nino
[23:21] <l3dx> ntu-bugsquad/d3bb0a4cbd317fbf2111e83dc1d52504f9d636de
[23:27] <Kamusin> sirs, I saw a report that have a post-installation script with broken packages, but main package is not in oficial ubuntu repository (daemon-tools)
[23:28] <Kamusin> what status shoul be marked? can I marked as invalid or ..?
[23:28] <Kamusin> should*
[23:31] <bdmurray> If the bug is not about an Ubuntu package or one provided by Ubuntu it should be marked invalid
[23:32] <Kamusin> thanks bdmurray ;)
[23:38] <l3dx> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/404339 <-- wishlist?
[23:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 404339 in ubuntu "Include Canon MP210 printer drivers" [Undecided,New]
[23:49] <l3dx> anyone around?
[23:49] <Admiral_Chicago> whats up l3dx
[23:49] <l3dx> hi
[23:49] <BUGabundo> some are l3dx
[23:50] <l3dx> I've just started reading over the howtos\buglists and I've found a openoffice bug, but I can't quite figure out if I should upstream it
[23:51] <l3dx> that is, I've found a bug filed by someone else
[23:51] <l3dx> so..I was just hoping for some advice
[23:53] <l3dx> should I file it over at oo.org and what should I do about the "ubuntu bug"
[23:55] <BUGabundo> l3dx: talk to ogra
[23:55] <BUGabundo> there are many restritions from SUN
[23:55] <BUGabundo> for our bugd
[23:56] <l3dx> BUGabundo: ok :)
[23:56] <bdmurray> BUGabundo: calc is the maintainer of openoffice.org
[23:56] <bdmurray> l3dx: what bug is it?
[23:56] <l3dx> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org/+bug/404001
[23:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 404001 in openoffice.org "wrong result of var() function" [Undecided,New]
[23:56] <BUGabundo> oopss
[23:56] <BUGabundo> sorry ogra
[23:56] <BUGabundo> I meant to say calc
[23:57]  * BUGabundo slaps himself and goes to get a glass of water
[23:57] <bdmurray> l3dx: Did you say you had tested it?
[23:57] <l3dx> no, I've not
[23:57] <l3dx> as I said, I'm 100% fresh in the game
[23:58] <bdmurray> A good first step is to ensure the bug is reproducable, ideally with the development release of Ubuntu.
[23:58] <l3dx> ok, so I should do a dist-upgrade right away?
[23:59] <l3dx> though, this bug is for 9.04
[23:59] <bdmurray> l3dx: Right, but it likely wouldn't be fixed in that release.  Karmic is still an alpha, while I run it w/o problems the bug could be tested with a Live CD.


[02:34] <seidos> \o
[02:52] <jyo> o/
[03:11] <seidos> what's going on jyo ?
[17:50] <pleia2> I have dinner plans this evening so I won't be able to make the meeting
[17:51] <pleia2> who all will be here? anyone want to chair? :)
[17:58] <jledbetter> Not sure if we will be yet.
[18:00] <pleia2> Darkwing: will you be around?
[18:02] <Darkwing> I should be yes.
[18:03] <pleia2> ok, Darkwing will chair!
[18:03] <bkerensa> California this Friday! :D
[18:05] <pleia2> :)
[18:13] <Darkwing> Phone interview tomorrow and another one on tuesday!!!
[18:13]  * Darkwing does the happy dance.
[18:14] <Darkwing> Put my 15 years of web devel to work (I hope)
[18:17] <pleia2> :D
[18:19] <Darkwing> Las Vegas
[18:19] <Darkwing> That means I'll hit up E3 every year :D
[18:19] <pleia2> "yes" or "good interview" cheering?
[18:19] <Darkwing> I'm hoping for good interviews
[18:20] <pleia2> :)
[18:20] <akk> Good luck, Darkwing!
[18:20] <Darkwing> ty
[18:21] <pleia2> vegas is lovely
[18:22] <pleia2> we went twice last year, not at all this year and next year our travel is curbed (for multiple reasons)
[18:28] <Darkwing> I've been to vegas a few times... I love it.
[18:32] <akk> It's a lot of fun if you have a good tolerance for tacky. :)
[18:34] <pleia2> I'm also a big fan of tourist traps
[18:34] <pleia2> :)
[18:35] <Darkwing> I'll have to make sure I get a large place se we can host people.
[22:07]  * Darkwing shoots the Ubuntu wiki
[22:07] <Darkwing> I soooooo want to get rid of this thing.
[22:12]  * seidos hands Darkwing his gas gun