[17:09] <cprofitt> bdmurray: ping
[17:10] <cprofitt> question about Ubuntu patch for the diagram
[17:10] <cprofitt> I assume a patch could be proposed, tested and either released SRU or released to testing... accurate?
[17:13] <cprofitt> hggdh: ping
[18:34] <hggdh> cprofitt: here
[18:35] <hggdh> cprofitt: I do not know which diagram you are talking about; but, for SRUs the patch first has to be accepted and checked on Precise (the current development version)
[19:06] <ikt> hggdh: it's on the ubuntu planet at,m
[19:06] <ikt> http://ftbeowulf.wordpress.com/2011/11/11/uds-p-community-bug-involvement/
[19:48] <hggdh> ikt: ah, thank you
[19:49] <hggdh> a patch will always be provided to the current development version (unless already in); once verified in the dev version, it is *proposed* as a SRU
[19:50] <hggdh> if accepted as SRU, it will then be built to -proposed, again verified and, if it passed verification, moved over to -updates
[19:59] <hggdh> I left cproffit a comment on his blog


[20:56] <bluejack404> Hi! I have a question about the Welsh language. It's super short.
[20:57] <bluejack404> How do you write, "I am Welsh and I hate that I have to do this" in Welsh?
[20:57] <bluejack404> It's for a project, and I've found no other place to ask.


[01:41] <cyphermox> flexiondotorg: I defer to infinity or cjwatson or someone else who can merge debian-cd; I don't have access.
[05:10] <infinity> flexiondotorg: Merged.
[07:30] <flexiondotorg> infinity, Many thanks.
[07:31] <flexiondotorg> infinity, I don't see the merge upstream yet. How long will it take to be included?
[09:56] <rbasak> Can someone reject docker.io 1.6.2~dfsg1-1ubuntu4~15.04.1 from Vivid unapproved please? I have a replacement with the same version ready.
[09:57] <flexiondotorg> I've just tried an upgrade from 15.04 to 15.10 which fails because Thunderbird in 15.04 is newer than the one in 15.10.
[09:58] <cjwatson> cjwatson@snakefruit:~$ for c in main restricted universe multiverse; do ./suite-diff.py ~ubuntu-archive/mirror/ubuntu/dists/{vivid-updates,wily}/$c/source/Sources.gz gt; done
[09:58] <cjwatson> firefox: 41.0.1+build2-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> > 41.0+build3-0ubuntu2
[09:58] <cjwatson> oxide-qt: 1.9.5-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> > 1.9.1-0ubuntu1
[09:58] <cjwatson> thunderbird: 1:38.3.0+build1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> > 1:38.2.0+build1-0ubuntu3
[09:59] <cjwatson> infinity: ^- those could perhaps do with copying forward?  maybe with some discussion in the case of oxide-qt so that the CI Train stuff doesn't explode
[09:59] <cjwatson> chrisccoulson: ^-
[10:05] <flexiondotorg> cjwatson, Thanks for forwarding.
[10:11] <rbasak> Can someone reject docker.io 1.6.2~dfsg1-1ubuntu4~15.04.1 from Vivid unapproved please? I have a replacement with the same version ready.
[10:24] <chrisccoulson> cjwatson, yeah, my uploads got rejected because they reverted changes that hadn't been proposed in the bzr branches
[10:24] <cjwatson> ok, is that being reconciled?
[10:26] <chrisccoulson> I can fix thunderbird, but tbh, I'm not particularly happy with http://launchpadlibrarian.net/219814387/firefox_41.0%2Bbuild3-0ubuntu1_41.0%2Bbuild3-0ubuntu2.diff.gz (carrying a powerpc-specific patch with no upstream bug link)
[10:26] <chrisccoulson> ^ cjwatson
[10:26] <chrisccoulson> If it really is a Firefox bug, it should be reported and fixed upstream (or at least agreed upstream that it's a firefox bug)
[10:31] <chrisccoulson> And I don't actually understand why http://launchpadlibrarian.net/218029721/thunderbird_1%3A38.2.0%2Bbuild1-0ubuntu2_1%3A38.2.0%2Bbuild1-0ubuntu3.diff.gz is necessary - there's no Testsuite header in the control file anymore
[10:33] <rbasak> chrisccoulson: the Testsuite header is now automatically generated by dpkg-source
[10:33] <rbasak> http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=autopkgtest/autopkgtest.git;a=blob_plain;f=doc/README.package-tests.rst;hb=HEAD
[10:33] <rbasak> "This tag is added automatically by dpkg-source version 1.17.11 or later."
[10:34] <cjwatson> doko: ^- could you please get the firefox/powerpc thing proposed upstream so that this can be reconciled properly?
[10:36] <cjwatson> chrisccoulson: You can certainly see the thunderbird stuff failing in http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/t/thunderbird/wily/amd64/
[10:36] <cjwatson> Prior to doko's fix, that is
[10:36] <cjwatson> chrisccoulson: And it's failing for stables on http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/?q=thunderbird
[11:07] <didrocks> doko: the new gconf fix gnome-media FTBFS (due to gconf postinst not running successfully on builders and some machines) ^
[11:52] <rbasak> Can someone reject docker.io 1.6.2~dfsg1-1ubuntu4~15.04.1 from Vivid unapproved please? I have a replacement with the same version ready.
[11:58]  * didrocks flushes
[11:58] <didrocks> rbasak: done ^
[11:59] <rbasak> didrocks: thank you!
[12:00] <didrocks> yw
[12:05] <rbasak> infinity: do you mind taking care of the latest docker.io in the queues for Trusty and Vivid please?
[12:12] <rbasak> SRU tools are blocking on bugs mentioned in the changelog (and thus in Launchpad-Bugs-Fixed in the changes file I presume) but the bugs don't actually have Ubuntu tasks.
[12:12] <rbasak> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-core/+bug/1478660 for example - the reporter was asked for verification and it is appearing in the pending-sru report.
[12:12] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1478660 in juju-core/1.23 "juju uses proxy to access bootstrap node" [High,Fix committed]
[12:13] <rbasak> Should the changelog not include these references, or do we need to fix the tools?
[13:52] <chrisccoulson> jdstrand, would you mind copying the wily build of oxide from https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-mozilla-security/+archive/ubuntu/ppa to the archive please? (wily's version is older than vivid)
[13:53] <jdstrand> sure
[13:55] <rbasak> arges: thank you for clearing the apache2 SRU. Sorry, just uploaded another that was waiting for sponsorship by the same author.
[13:56] <arges> rbasak: no problem
[13:56] <rbasak> I'll ask him to try and bundle them together next time, but as he's a contributor I've not seen before I'd prefer to encourage him to carry on helping than to push back too hard
[13:57] <arges> rbasak: yup, hopefully this experience illustrates why bundling would be useful as a contributor too (if they are aware of it)
[14:01] <jdstrand> chrisccoulson: ok, copied to wily-proposed
[14:43] <arges> dannf: bug 1498618, are you doing an MRE for this instead or should I accept libguestfs into proposed as it is now?
[14:43] <ubot2> bug 1498618 in libguestfs "FTBFS in trusty (QEMU version parsing)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1498618
[15:05] <cyphermox> dannf: ^
[15:21] <doko> bdmurray, please review the python3.4 update for trusty-proposed. patch was reviewed by both tyhicks and barry, updated the SRU description how to test for the PEP 476 behaviour
[15:24] <bdmurray> Is it Thursday? ;-) today is arges's day
[15:25] <arges> bdmurray: yea i'll look at it, just did a pass
[15:27] <arges> doko: 3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1 is still in -proposed, does this superceed it?
[15:28] <arges> doko: ah i see 14.04.1 was removed due to regression
[16:06] <dannf> arges: i think an MRE would be a good idea - i tried to push upstream to help w/ that (e.g. providing test commands I can wrap in DEP-8, etc) - but I haven't heard back yet. So, +1 accepting as-is.
[16:06] <dannf> cyphermox: awesome! thanks for that!
[16:06] <dannf> cjwatson: ^
[16:06] <stgraber> apw: ^
[16:07] <apw> we have a regression in play following a CVE fix in the kernel which is hopefully repaired by the lxc upload above so it would be good to get that in play as soon as we can
[16:08] <arges> dannf: ok
[16:09] <arges> apw: guess that's me
[16:10] <arges> stgraber: apw : does this reference any bug#?
[16:11] <apw> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1504781
[16:11] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1504781 in lxc "lxc-test-ubuntu hangs forever in trusty-proposed with Linux 3.13.0-66: AppArmor denies /dev/ptmx mounting" [Undecided,New]
[16:11] <apw> arges, ^
[16:13] <stgraber> arges: wasn't made aware of a bug #, I can re-upload with this one if you'd like
[16:13] <arges> stgraber: : ) that would be great. I'll reject the current
[16:13] <arges> was looking for the debdiff so i wouldn't have to bug you, but if you have that all setup even better
[16:14] <cjwatson> dannf: yw
[16:15] <stgraber> arges: re-uploaded
[16:15] <arges> stgraber: thanks, will review soon
[16:18] <arges> ok accepted
[16:19] <stgraber> cool
[16:20] <apw> arges, thanks
[16:20] <apw> stgraber, adt should do its do shortly and confirm its fixed
[16:22] <stgraber> hopefully that was enough. I went through the upstream git history and it looks like this should contain all the relevant stuff.
[16:22] <stgraber> only extra stuff we have in wily is to support systemd which isn't relevant to trusty
[20:02] <cyphermox> ^ yet another iteration of ipmitool SRU for the usb transport, fixes the ppc build failure.
[20:58] <stgraber> arges, apw: so the lxc SRU is bad in that it doesn't fix anything, I'm sending an updated one now which based on feedback from jjohansen should actually fix things
[20:58] <stgraber> arges: feel free to fail the SRU if you want, or just wait for the new one and let that one in
[21:16] <apw> stgraber, thank you for wacking om this 1
[21:30] <arges> stgraber: ok i'll look at it now
[21:33] <arges> stgraber: don't see it in the queue . did it get rejected?
[21:34] <stgraber> 21:30 -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (trusty-proposed) [1.0.7-0ubuntu0.9]
[21:34] <stgraber> looks like somebody beat you to it
[21:34] <arges> stgraber: cool. : )
[21:34] <arges> well hopefully that really fixes it
[21:36] <stgraber> yeah, I hope so
[21:38] <stgraber> looks like pitti was the one accepting it