[08:04] <dholbach> good morning
[09:42] <rickspencer3> kalikiana,  hey, so how am I supposed to  delete documents from a UIdb these days?
[23:34] <ahoneybun> ahayzen, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/11917249/
[23:48] <ahayzen> ahoneybun, sorry got distracted attempting to write qmlunit tests
[23:49] <ahoneybun> not a big hurry ahayzen, just curious
[23:49] <ahayzen> ahoneybun, is than an error in the console?
[23:50] <ahoneybun> the thing is that it shows progess thata is is downloading but I don't see where it is saving it
[23:51] <ahoneybun> ahayzen: what is oxide_browser_process_main
[23:52] <ahayzen> ah ... ahoneybun i assume it'll do something similar to contenthub
[23:52] <ahayzen> some form of oxide process ;-) lol
[23:52] <ahoneybun> if I don't have code to handle contenthub it will not work no?
[23:53] <ahayzen> ahoneybun, do you get a downloadId ?
[23:53] <ahayzen> ahoneybun, no i mean a similar concept to contenthub not code
[23:53] <ahoneybun> where would I find it?
[23:54] <ahayzen> single.downloadId
[23:54] <ahoneybun> I don;t see that
[23:54] <ahoneybun> not in the code
[23:54] <ahoneybun> oh
[23:55] <ahoneybun> single.download(text.text) ?
[23:55] <ahayzen> no i mean bind something to it and see if you get a value
[23:55] <ahayzen> it says that value "provides the unique identifier that represents the download within the download manager."
[23:55] <ahayzen> which sounds important i think not totally sure though
[23:55] <ahoneybun> bind?
[23:56] <ahayzen> Label { text: single.downloadId }
[23:56] <ahoneybun> TextField { id: text
[23:56] <ahoneybun> that is how the example is
[23:59] <ahoneybun> ahayzen, I'm trying to get this: ttp://dl.fullcirclemagazine.org/issue1_en.pdf
[23:59] <ahoneybun> with the downloadmanager
[23:59] <ahayzen> does the progress at least go to 100% ?


[07:25] <Foxy-> Hello?
[07:27] <Foxy-> how I must to chatting hear?
[07:30] <Foxy-> goodbye everybody!
[17:46] <melodie> hi can someone help me with my card sound? I can listen but I can't be heard (Xubuntu 22.04). My card sound is "00:1f.3 Audio device: Intel Corporation Cannon Point-LP High Definition Audio Controller (rev 11)" kernel  5.15.0-72-generic and  5.15.0-70 smae result. The headset is alright and the card works (checked in a Windows install as I'm dualbooting).
[17:47] <melodie> Please can you help me? My colleagues use Ubuntu classic and I could not talk normally during the online metting on jitisi :"-(
[17:48] <melodie> I had to use the "skype check tool" to see if it worked elsewhere or with another headset
[17:50] <melodie> also here is the output from "aplay -l" : https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/CbR3KW5M8G/f
[19:13] <gnrp> melodie: When you open the audio mixer, do you see anything under input devices when you speak?
[19:27] <melodie> gnrp, yes. The issue might be with the default driver
[19:27] <gnrp> ah, ok
[19:27] <melodie> this is wh
[19:27] <gnrp> and when you choose the according device for the applications that you want to record with?
[19:27] <melodie> I don't want to record
[19:27] <melodie> using jitis
[19:28] <melodie> want to be heard
[19:28] <melodie> Jitsi.com
[19:28] <melodie> meet.jit.se
[19:28] <gnrp> well, it is the same
[19:29] <melodie> if you say so :)
[19:29] <gnrp> when you open the browser and point it to that website, under record or so (don't know the exact english term) in the mixer applet, you can select which device they shall use
[19:29] <melodie> yes yes, audio is allowed in Firefox
[19:31] <melodie> gnrp, which country are you from? Which one is your native language?
[19:58] <gnrp> melodie: German
[20:00] <gnrp> melodie: It is not about what is allowed in Firefox, but what input device it is set to
[20:11] <PeGaSuS> hello folks. this might be something unique: I'm moving a Xubuntu install (one HDD) to another computer. the dead computer had Secure Boot enabled, Intel CPU, etc.. this PC also has Secure Boot but an AMD CPU. will my Xubuntu boot?
[21:13] <tomreyn> PeGaSuS: if you disable secure boot, it should
[21:14] <tomreyn> that's if you also copied the boot loader or have a separate one, and configured the 'bios' to use it
[21:17] <PeGaSuS> it booted without even removing Secure Boot on this HP EliteDesk.. I'm now updating the system with "sudo apt update" and things seems to be going well
[21:19] <PeGaSuS> now I wonder if it will understand that this PC has a WiFi and Bluetooth card while the other one hadn't
[21:26] <PeGaSuS> I have a stupid question: if I try to install Xubuntu on the disk without erasing it, will it keep any settings? or it will just erase everything?
[21:36] <PeGaSuS> apparently it's not detecting the wireless card.. any ideas?
[21:43] <tomreyn> it would have detected it if it was fully supported
[21:43] <tomreyn> find out which wireless chipset it is first of all
[21:44] <tomreyn> sudo lspci -knnv    or    sudo lsusb   should tell
[21:49] <PeGaSuS> tomreyn: https://termbin.com/gm3i
[21:49] <PeGaSuS> output of `sudo lspci -knnv`
[21:53] <tomreyn> PeGaSuS: so this is your wireless chipset: 06:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9260 [8086:2526] (rev 29)
[21:53] <PeGaSuS> apparently, yes
[21:53] <tomreyn> it would use "Kernel modules: iwlwifi", but for some reason this was not loaded. which kernel are you using, which xubuntu version? how did you boot?
[21:54] <tomreyn> surprisingly, many of the other hardware components also have a matching driver detected but not loaded, that's quite unusual.
[21:55] <PeGaSuS> I just booted into the old disk, and it booted without issues
[21:55] <tomreyn> possibly dues to secureboot
[21:55] <tomreyn> actually most likely due to that. you'll probably need to enroll the mok, yet
[21:57] <PeGaSuS> i did enrolled the MOK. at least it asked me for a password
[21:58] <tomreyn> and yet all those drivers aren't loaded
[21:59] <PeGaSuS> any idea how to re-enroll or something?
[22:00] <tomreyn> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UEFI/SecureBoot
[22:01] <tomreyn> you use the "mokutil" command to manage certs
[22:02] <tomreyn> if any need yet to be installed, that should happen (be prompted for) during next reboot
[22:04] <PeGaSuS> hum.. sudo update-secureboot-policy --enroll-key says "Nothing to do"
[22:09] <PeGaSuS> `sudo update-secureboot-policy --new-key` gives no output whatsoever
[22:17] <PeGaSuS> Sorry, I need to go afk for a bit
[22:41] <PeGaSuS> so, after another reboot I have WiFi and Bluetooth


[13:11] <juliank> Anybody here? 3 days ago I mentioned that I only received the initial email and the added bug tracker watch for bug 1657440 - obviously SPF checks fail on that, but I'm not sure if that alone is the reason they were dropped.
[13:13] <juliank> Should I open a bug against launchpad?
[13:17] <juliank> It would really be awesome if someone could look into these missing notifications, as missing bug comments or maybe even bugs (?) is not a good thing
[22:56] <wgrant> juliank: SPF wouldn't fail (the envelope sender is canonical.com in all cases), but user domains with DMARC p=reject policies may be problematic. Can you file a question on LP with details about missed messages?
[22:57] <juliank> wgrant: Well, the first comment I don't have was from canonical.com too :) But sure, yes, I can do that.
[22:58] <juliank> Maybe Google was annoyed by launchpad emails and decided to reject them for a day ...
[22:59] <juliank> Oh, just noticed the "Alberto Salvia Novella (es20490446e) 6 hours ago" importance changes there
[23:01] <juliank> wgrant: https://answers.launchpad.net/launchpad/+question/458337
[23:01] <wgrant> juliank: SPF doesn't cover From, just the envelope sender
[23:01] <juliank> wgrant: Yes, I know
[23:01] <wgrant> DMARC is the first thing to go ridiculously overboard and consider From and break mailing lists.
[23:02] <juliank> I also seem to have received my first comment, but not my second one :/
[23:02] <wgrant> That's... odd.
[23:02] <wgrant> I guess Gmail still doesn't let you debug this at all?
[23:02] <wgrant> It's been a long time since I used it...
[23:02] <juliank> No chance to debug anything.
[23:03] <juliank> If it was bounced someone with access to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>should have the answer
[23:04] <juliank> wgrant: Well, Google's only analysis tool shows that DMARC failed
[23:04] <juliank> f0r the initial message
[23:04] <juliank>        dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=canonical.com
[23:04] <juliank> This was From: Andreas Hasenack<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[23:05] <juliank> same for my comment
[23:05] <juliank> wgrant: My comment: https://paste.ubuntu.com/23991480/
[23:06] <juliank> wgrant: Initial email: https://paste.ubuntu.com/23991482/
[23:06] <juliank> Both contain all headers as google added them (Authentication-Results, SPF-Received, and friends)
[23:07] <juliank> But really, gmail also sometimes decides something is too spam and bounces it
[23:08] <juliank> and I have no insight in what was bounced
[23:10] <juliank> I wonder why the canonical.com email fails dmarc, I see no dmarc records
[23:10] <juliank> and if a source domain does not do dmarc, gmail does not show anything about dmarc :/
[23:16] <juliank> I can play with more things in 24 hours by directing everything via my bounce-catching email
[23:34] <wgrant> juliank: dmarc=fail with p=NONE is meaningless, though.
[23:34] <wgrant> p is the action.
[23:34] <juliank> That's all I have :(
[23:34] <wgrant> Oh, missed your second last line, huh.
[23:35] <wgrant> So it thinks it has DMARC even though it doesn't?
[23:35] <wgrant> weird...
[23:36] <wgrant> Oh there is a DMARC record for canonical.com
[23:36] <wgrant> But it is indeed p=none
[23:38] <juliank> wgrant: Ah. You have to search for _dmarc - that's why I did not see it
[23:45] <juliank> wgrant: But the non-comments (bug tracker add at least) come from<EMAIL_ADDRESS>anyway, and the one I got does not have a DMARC failure, as launchpad has no DMARC policy
[23:55] <wgrant> juliank: Emails should be From the actor's email address, unless the email address is hidden in which case the @bugs.launchpad.net one is used.
[23:55] <wgrant> Even for bug tracker links
[23:55] <juliank> ah
[23:55] <juliank> well, in the actuin I received, it was hidden
[23:56] <juliank> But I did not seem to have gotten a notification for vej adding the tags


[12:54] <alumno_> a
[12:54] <alumno> b
[21:25] <Harry> hello :)
[21:25] <diogenes_Vx15> !hi
[21:27] <Harry> Is there anyone using wireguard to conceal traffic with his iOS in a public WIFI, like Freifunk?
[21:28] <Harry> And, yes, I'll replace my apple device soon, but still have the pain point now (:


[12:10] <Techman> Well if this group ever comes active again, invite me back in here please
[12:10] <Techman> Otherwise it's taking space up on my IRC Cloud