[02:15] <lotuspsychje> good morning
[02:54] <slingamn> will 20.04 support adiantum for disk encryption?
[02:54] <lotuspsychje> lets have a look
[02:55] <lotuspsychje> nothing in apt cache on that keyword slingamn
[02:55] <slingamn> 19.10 ships the adiantum kmod but it's not hooked up in cryptsetup or whatever library cryptsetup uses
[02:55] <lotuspsychje> whats the exact packagename?
[02:56] <slingamn> cryptsetup maybe
[02:56] <lotuspsychje> yeah that gives some hits
[02:56] <lotuspsychje> !info cryptsetup
[09:42] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: morning
[09:43] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> morning
[09:43] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: i got a recent bug on workspaces to dock extension, since the extension app joined desktop
[09:43] <lotuspsychje> it just stopped working
[09:44] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: whats your issue exactly?
[09:44] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> so I installed the latest nightly iso and i cannot access the settings for any individual extension. whether I select the "gear" icon from the extension itself or from within gnome tweak
[09:44] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> i can click it all day and nothing happens
[09:44] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: same
[09:45] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: when i click the settings on workspaces to dock, it opens n empty window and nothign happens
[09:45] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> so I'm guessing this is a known bug then
[09:45] <lotuspsychje> with a ! mark next to the gear
[09:45] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I don't even get the empty window
[09:45] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: wich extension are you testing?
[09:46] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I've tried dash-to-dock which doesn't work at all, I tried open weather
[09:46] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> which works, but you cannot change the city since you cannot access the settings
[09:46] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: can you try mine, so we can at least confirm the bug?
[09:46] <lotuspsychje> lemme pass you my bug ID holdon
[09:46] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> yes i will
[09:47] <lotuspsychje> bug #1867445
[09:47] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> lotuspsychje: I just tried to install the extension and i just get an error on install
[09:48] <lotuspsychje> its in the repos, should install fine?
[09:48] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> it installs, but there is an error when trying to use it
[09:48] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> sorry
[09:48] <lotuspsychje> ah
[09:49] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> just says "Error loading extension"
[09:49] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: can you confirm the bug plz?
[09:50] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> which is the case with pretty much all of the the extensions I have tried to install
[09:50] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: maybe also add, you also have this with your extensions
[09:50] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> lotuspsychje: yes, i certainly will
[09:50] <lotuspsychje> tnx mate
[09:51] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: did you notice if this also started to happen with the new extensions app?
[09:52] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I'm not sure, I just installed 20.04 last night for the first time with the latest nightly
[09:52] <lotuspsychje> mine did work before with gnome-tweaks
[09:52] <lotuspsychje> ah kk, you cant know then
[09:54] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> yeah, sorry
[09:54] <lotuspsychje> dont worry
[09:54] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I was thinking that it was close enough to release to give it a go
[09:54] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> but i guess there are some MAJOR changes in gnome 3.36
[09:54] <lotuspsychje> for testing purposes it is, not for daily use
[09:55] <lotuspsychje> yeah some nice candy inside
[09:55] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> right, i understand
[09:55] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> agreed. it is MUCH faster
[09:57] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I've been on Arch for a while now and I am looking at moving back to Ubuntu on my laptop. I was hoping that 20.04 was close enough to complete to use it as my daily driver, but I'm sure all of the extensions will take some time to migrate over and be fully functional
[09:57] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> Arch Plasma, that is
[09:58] <lotuspsychje> think the extensions app is still worked on, we will see at final release how things will be
[09:59] <lotuspsychje> like usual, we expect always more bugs till 20.04.1
[10:00] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> of course
[10:01] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> ah well, 19.10 will be great until such a time
[10:02] <lotuspsychje> w1nd0wl1ck3r: tnx to confirm
[10:02] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> no problem, happy to help
[10:02] <lotuspsychje> maybe i should add the extension app too
[10:03] <lotuspsychje> as it doesnt showup my extension
[10:03] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> the extension app on my system on shows 3 extensions as being installed, gnome tweak shows 8
[10:04] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> *only shows
[10:04] <lotuspsychje> yeah mine 2, and tweaks also more
[10:04] <lotuspsychje> !info extensions
[10:05] <lotuspsychje> not sure what the packagename is
[10:11] <lotuspsychje> brb coffee first
[10:14] <w1nd0wl1ck3r> I'm off to get some work done, while I still can. Pretty sure will be my last day at the office for a while
[10:25] <lotuspsychje> yeah its getting worst everywhere
[11:39] <lotuspsychje> found a new bug on recent -desktop daily: bug #1867613
[23:28] <cowpig> hello friends
[23:29] <cowpig> I'm having a problem with iwlwifi on my new dell 7740 (which has an Intel Wi-Fi 6 AX200 card):
[23:30] <cowpig> ```
[23:30] <cowpig> [ 5422.817623] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: 0x0000025B | CNVR_SCU_SD_REGS_SD_REG_ACTIVE_VDIG_MIRROR[ 5422.817908] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Collecting data: trigger 2 fired.[ 5423.671862] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Applying debug destination EXTERNAL_DRAM[ 5423.842860] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: FW already configured (0) - re-configuring[ 5423.859968] iwlwifi
[23:30] <cowpig> 0000:70:00.0: BIOS contains WGDS but no WRDS[ 5424.219376] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x0.[ 5424.219631] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Start IWL Error Log Dump:[ 5424.219637] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Status: 0x00000040, count: 6[ 5424.219641] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Loaded firmware version: 48.4fa0041f.0 cc-a0-48.ucode
[23:31] <cowpig> mm apologies for the formatting
[23:31] <cowpig> important bits I think are:
[23:31] <cowpig> [ 5424.219376] iwlwifi 0000:70:00.0: Microcode SW error detected. Restarting 0x0.
[23:31] <Bashing-om> !paste | cowpig
[23:32] <cowpig> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/swMdKpqvkz/ (thanks Bashing-om)
[23:33] <cowpig> the error seems to repeat
[23:33] <cowpig> resulting in a ping history that looks like this:
[23:33] <oerheks> Microcode SW error detected. + Loaded firmware version: 48.4fa0041f.0 cc-a0-48.ucode ..
[23:34] <cowpig> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/XVN28T47bQ/
[23:36] <cowpig> I tried installing `backport-iwlwifi-dkms` per someone on here's suggestion yesterday, but didn't change anything
[23:36] <cowpig> it* didn't change anything -- problem persists
[23:38] <Bashing-om> cowpig: Those are new ones on me - Do not know what to advise :(


[08:44] <juliank> The white mantic preview background is driving me somewhat mad :D
[08:58] <seb128> juliank, change to the dark mode instead?
[08:58] <juliank> hmm is there a dark mode image separate? my gsettings may be messed up :D
[08:59] <juliank> I have both pointing at warty-final-ubuntu :(
[09:01] <juliank> I have a weird system running the GNOME session and then patched back the wallpapers to ubuntu via an override but there was no dark mode when I made it
[09:04] <juliank> oh it may also be that there previous were dark images but I wanted the purple oens
[09:45] <seb128> juliank, /usr/share/backgrounds/ubuntu-wallpaper-d.png
[09:45] <juliank> seb128: thanks yes, I grepped the gsettings defaults already and applied it :)
[09:53] <GunnarHj> seb128: It may be a good idea to update fonts-ubuntu at Debian, but is there any public upstream?
[09:55] <duflu> GunnarHj, perhaps https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-fonts
[09:56] <GunnarHj> duflu: That seems to be it. Thanks!
[09:59] <seb128> GunnarHj, hum, maybe indeed
[11:31] <KGB-2> Extension Manager signed tags 8dcf0ef Jeremy Bicha upstream/0.4.2 * Upstream version 0.4.2 * https://deb.li/sQpi
[11:32] <KGB-2> Extension Manager pristine-tar 461aeb3 Jeremy Bícha gnome-shell-extension-manager_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz.delta gnome-shell-extension-manager_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz.id * pristine-tar data for gnome-shell-extension-manager_0.4.2.orig.tar.gz * https://deb.li/z7W2
[15:21] <GunnarHj> seb128: Looked at https://github.com/canonical/Ubuntu-fonts, but find it confusing. Most importantly I don't see the monospace fonts. But also in other respects we should talk about what should be packaged. There are woff2 fonts, for instance.
[15:21] <GunnarHj> So I won't do anything in Debian for now.
[15:22] <seb128> ack
[15:23] <seb128> I'm in no way a font expert, I just end up having to deal with fires and do my best on such things because we don't have anyone else around to do the changes
[15:23] <seb128> GunnarHj, the monospace fonts are in https://github.com/canonical/UbuntuMono-fonts
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master db3c881 Marco Trevisan * pushed 6 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/iQDW2
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master 35922d5 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/ patches/ubuntu/main-Support-loading-multiple-Yaru-theme-variants.patch ubuntu-session-mods/ubuntu.json * debian/ubuntu.json: Prefer light color scheme * https://deb.li/w8Ij
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master e4c9143 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/patches/ (52 files in 2 dirs) * debian/patches: Cherry-pick patches from upstream main branch * https://deb.li/3lxiR
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master 5a7159a Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/ control control.in * debian/control: Recommends more recent version of yaru theme * https://deb.li/GuAD
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master bb8d489 Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Update changelog * https://deb.li/35Dhz
[15:29] <KGB-0> gnome-shell ubuntu/master 1d499dc Marco Trevisan (Treviño) debian/changelog * Upload to mantic * https://deb.li/PDel
[15:44] <GunnarHj> seb128: Thanks, that might make it possible to proceed. But it means that "upstream" for fonts-ubuntu currently consists of three different sources including the legacy ones. Or should we skip the legacy ones in Debian?
[15:44] <GunnarHj> Also: Should we break out monospace to a fonts-ubuntu-mono source package (which would be made a dependency of fonts-ubuntu) to follow upstream's organization of it?
[18:21] <KGB-2> gtk4 signed tags 8ea60a0 Jeremy Bicha ubuntu/4.12.0+ds-2ubuntu1 * gtk4 Debian release 4.12.0+ds-2ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/ikKxR
[18:33] <KGB-2> gtk4 signed tags 55fba8b Jeremy Bicha ubuntu/4.12.1+ds-2ubuntu1 * gtk4 Debian release 4.12.1+ds-2ubuntu1 * https://deb.li/7Nai
[18:33] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master b1405e9 Jeremy Bicha * pushed 87 commits (first 5 follow) * https://deb.li/3rKHh
[18:33] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master 0f67d61 Bilal Elmoussaoui gtk/gtkfontdialogbutton.c * gi: Fix missing namespace * https://deb.li/ceQ7
[18:33] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master ff56029 Matthias Clasen gdk/wayland/gdkapplaunchcontext-wayland.c * wayland: Don't assume the shell protocol * https://deb.li/ykp2
[18:33] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master 8a4bde6 Simon McVittie testsuite/gtk/colorutils.c * tests: Accept slightly different numeric results * https://deb.li/3MLbC
[18:34] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master 2e2857d Michael Catanzaro gtk/gtknotebook.c * notebook: fix critical when switching page * https://deb.li/ILuU
[18:34] <KGB-2> gtk4 ubuntu/master beb5ede Matthias Clasen gtk/gtkmenubutton.c * menubutton: Don't assume the root is a window * https://deb.li/3eNSF


[02:13] <rics> having a hard time trying to make LifeChat LX-3000 to work...:'(
[15:31] <McYa> Greeting. i have RadeonHD 7800. i understand the new open source driver is on the way, but can i do anything to fix small, yet noticable screen tear on video playback? im on 16.04
[17:24] <ricotz> jbicha, hi, any objections if I push a gtk+3.0 git snapshot to gnome3-staging?
[17:25] <jbicha> ricotz: for yakkety or just zesty?
[17:25] <ricotz> both
[17:26] <jbicha> if it works, I don't have a problem with it
[17:26] <jbicha> since zesty is using 3.22, we could just upload to zesty directly if there are particular fixes you want
[17:26] <ricotz> aka gtk-3-22 which kind of only receives bug fixes, while 3.22.3 wasn't uploaded and 3.22.4 isnt there yet
[17:27] <ricotz> 3.22.4 will fix some x11 issues of gdkscreen
[17:27] <ricotz> but it isn't released yet
[17:27] <ricotz> mclasen might do it next week though
[17:28] <jbicha> ok
[17:28] <ricotz> I don't think a git snapshot in the archive is nice
[17:28] <ricotz> of couse pushing 3.22.3 wouldn't hurt
[17:30] <jbicha> if 3.22.4 comes out in the next week or so, I might just wait until then
[17:31] <jbicha> I'm mostly offline this month so feel free to email me if you want to ping me
[17:37] <ricotz> jbicha, ok, that is fine -- the snapshot will be a nice test then
[20:49] <ricotz> jbicha, and there is 3.22.4 already
[20:51] <jbicha> cool, I'll merge from Debian after it's uploaded there ( so it looks nicer on the version tracker )
[20:53] <ricotz> ;)


[14:48] <hallyn> jamespage: hey, so I'd like to hook up an automated run of lp:~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test
[14:49]  * jamespage looking
[14:50] <hallyn> it ain't purty, but catches bugs
[14:52] <jamespage> hallyn: so can it run in a KVM instance?
[14:52] <jamespage> or does it need to run on bare-metal?
[15:02] <hallyn> yup, it can run in kvm instance
[15:17] <jamespage> hallyn: sorry thinking about this - its not quite like anything else we already have automated
[15:18] <hallyn> jamespage: is there a url showing me how to make it more like the tests you have automated?
[15:19] <hallyn> jamespage: would the libvirt tests in lp:qa-regression-testing fit better?
[15:19] <jamespage> hallyn, not sure TBH
[15:22] <jamespage> hallyn: so we could make it a set of tests off the end of an install test
[15:22] <jamespage> like we do for lamp
[15:22] <jamespage> automated install of ISO with required packages and then execute your test.
[15:24] <jamespage> they run as root
[15:24] <jamespage> so that would be OK
[15:27] <hallyn> jamespage: that'd be great
[15:29] <jamespage> hallyn: OK so can you take a look at     bzr branch lp:~ubuntu-server-iso-testing-dev/+junk/server-tests-precise
[15:30] <jamespage> this is really a new test_case (see subdirectories)
[15:30] <jamespage> at the moment the tests that are run in each test case are python unittests
[15:31] <jamespage> which means we can grab the results and display in jenkins
[15:31] <jamespage> they must all be in a file called 'test' in the test_case directory
[15:31] <jamespage> you can handle some of the package install stuff using the preseed - see one of the other test cases for an example
[15:36] <jamespage> hallyn: do you think that you can refactor what you have into that framework?
[15:37] <jamespage> we can get it up and running for precise hoepfully
[15:38] <hallyn> absolutely - well, in time for precise will depend, but it can definately be refactored like that
[15:38] <hallyn> jamespage: thanks
[15:39] <jamespage> hallyn: I say for precise because I know the QA team are going to be working on a new test framework for delivery early next cycle
[15:43] <jibel> hallyn, if you can provide a test that is an executable and its output is junit xml then its good.
[15:43] <jibel> For precise we should be able to hack something into the existing tool like we did for software-center.
[15:47] <hallyn> (*$&%(*$&% xml *$&%*($&% )
[15:48] <hallyn> so to be clear, if i refactor it like this now, i'll have to do it again for p+1?
[15:48] <hallyn> if so, it may be a better use of my time to run the testsuite by hand and refactor for p+1
[15:49] <jibel> no, you wont because we'll use the same output format for p+1
[15:49] <hallyn> ah, ok
[15:50] <hallyn> thanks guys, made some notes, will looka t this after ff
[15:52] <rbasak> hallyn, did you still need me to run the lxc test on arm? I think you asked me to hold on the other day?
[15:59] <hallyn> rbasak: yeah that'd be great
[16:06] <jibel> jamespage, could you help verifying bug 708548 and bug 810068   in lucid ? I've no iscsi setup
[16:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 708548 in kickseed (Ubuntu Natty) (and 3 other projects) "kickstart not removing logical volume data (affects: 1) (heat: 11)" [Medium,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/708548
[16:06] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 810068 in partman-iscsi (Ubuntu Natty) (and 7 other projects) "kickstart iscsi option broken (affects: 2) (heat: 16)" [High,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/810068
[16:11] <jamespage> jibel: hmm - I might not have either - had a slight accident - let me see
[16:14] <jamespage> jibel: I think I can resurrect it but do we have any example kickstarts for testing this?
[16:18] <jibel> jamespage, I thought there was one attached to the report, but apparently not :/
[16:18] <jamespage> jibel: may make it a little difficult
[16:18] <jibel> indeed
[16:45] <jibel> jamespage, and could you test a "default" preseeded iscsi install ? do you have a preseed for that ?
[16:45] <jamespage> jibel: I don't have preseeds for any type of iscsi install
[16:46] <jibel> jamespage, you should fix that :)
[16:46] <jamespage> jibel: sorry - not trying to be difficult
[16:46] <jamespage> thats happening all by itself!
[16:47] <jamespage> jibel: I can easily setup a rig to let me do manual iscsi installs; still have scripts
[16:51] <balloons> weekly qa meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in 10 mins :-)
[17:02] <rbasak> hallyn: lxc-test.sh seems to be trying to download armhf oneiric which doesn't exist
[17:02] <rbasak> I had another weird error as well, so I'm reinstalling to see if it happens again
[17:05] <jamespage> jibel: when do these need to be verified by?
[17:05] <jamespage> I know i should know....
[17:06] <jibel> jamespage, should have been done already, but no later than tomorrow
[17:06] <jibel> if we want them in 10.04.4 images
[17:06] <jamespage> jibel: right - I see
[17:07] <jamespage> jibel: I can't do it right now but I can take a look first thing tomorrow? would that be OK
[17:08] <jibel> jamespage, sure, that would be.
[23:17] <bdmurray> if somebody could confirm bug 928447 that'd be neat
[23:17] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 928447 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "possible to use a number for your computer's name (affects: 1) (heat: 6)" [Medium,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/928447