[12:03] <brobostigon> morning everyone.
[17:03] <brobostigon> good afternoon chippanfat
[17:04] <chippanfat> Hellooo :)
[17:04] <chippanfat> enjoying the weather? :)
[17:04] <brobostigon> the sun is nice, yes.
[17:04] <chippanfat> :D
[17:04] <ianto> chippanfat: Shwmae bach
[17:04] <chippanfat> Heyyyy :d
[17:04] <chippanfat> * :D
[17:04] <chippanfat> how are we all? :)
[17:04] <brobostigon> good afternoon ianto :)
[17:04] <ianto> chippanfat: Got my uniform lastnight ;)
[17:05] <brobostigon> chippanfat: could be better, i am feeling really ill. how about you?
[17:06] <chippanfat> I'm feeling good thankyou :D
[17:06] <chippanfat> ianto: you in tonight?
[17:07] <brobostigon> :)
[17:07] <ianto> chippanfat: I am normally but because of my clutch, I start proper work on Tuesday
[17:07] <chippanfat> niceee :D
[17:07] <chippanfat> ianto: usually busy tuesdays :) so you should profit on your fuel :D
[17:08] <ianto> chippanfat: Good, what's your job title btw?
[17:10] <chippanfat> instore faggot :)
[17:10] <chippanfat> or csr :p


[01:06] <krijali> I'll send this question out again to see if anyone would like to take a crack at it. I was told to come here to ask a prevu related question although I'm running Hardy (on PPC arch - so yeah it's strictly unofficial, but yeah). When I attempt to run 'sudo -E prevu-init' I get an error back (after a few lines) saying the following: "Failure trying to run: chroot /var/cache/prevu/builds/8156/. mount -t proc proc /proc (then ) pbuilder:
[01:06] <krijali> debootstrap failed
[01:13] <Hobbsee> krijali: ask jdong - he wrote it.
[01:13] <Hobbsee> !info prevu
[01:13] <Hobbsee> it does exist in the repos.  wow.
[01:14] <krijali> will do, thank you! - or atleast I'll submit it as a possible bug
[02:09] <Quentusrex> Hello
[02:09] <Quentusrex> How can I find out if Ibex will include the new Intel graphics 2.4.0 driver?
[03:58] <kallu> 30 min back intrepid updated + upgraded .. kdm and kde are not working .. any suggestions
[04:02] <RAOF> kallu: Not without any sort of information, no.
[04:02] <RAOF> !doesntwork | kallu
[04:03] <RAOF> Also, /var/log/Xorg.0.log might be interesting.  But that'll depend on your previous answers :)
[04:05] <kallu> kdm not starting(getting busy mouse) .. if used gdm and trying to start kde .. not even kde splash is appearing
[06:18] <skreechmiester> !tab
[07:49] <Raas|wtf> im a windows user...
[07:49] <Raas|wtf> looking at kubuntu, any recommendations for/against?
[08:02] <bazhang> Raas|wtf, please change your nick: /nick <newnickname>
[08:04] <bazhang> Raas|wtf, this is not a chat channel; you can read reviews of kubuntu ubuntu etc linked at www.distrowatch.com
[08:06] <Raas|wtf> change my nick? wtf
[11:06] <kallu> today's kde(4.1) update breaks the system .. no kde application is starting
[11:07] <exco> aloah
[11:14] <havocstorm> >	Hey, have you guys seen the intrepid ibex mockups?
[11:14] <havocstorm> http://willwill100.deviantart.com/art/Interpid-Ibex-Mockup-Part-2-93584910
[12:04] <SwedeMike> looking at <http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=intel_x4500hd&num=2> it seems xorg 7.4/mesa7.1/xf86-video-intel 2.4.0 is needed to drive a centrino 2 machine (thinking of the lenovo x200). Does anyone know if these will make it into 8.10 ?
[12:09] <SwedeMike> or, rather, I'm interesting in what alpha/beta version they might be included
[12:38] <BUGabundo> what's up with /libwbclient0_2%3a3.2.0-4ubuntu3_amd64.deb  and likewise?
[12:40] <Hobbsee> it exists?
[12:41] <Hobbsee> and why are you posting the same thing in multiple channels?
[13:13] <BUGabundo> sorry Hobbsee
[13:14] <BUGabundo> not every one is in the same #s
[13:14] <BUGabundo> I've been hit by that prob for a few days now
[13:14] <Hobbsee> no, they aren't but you're effectively asking 2+ different people to give you the same answer, which is a waste of effort.
[13:15] <BUGabundo> Hobbsee: see private IM
[13:15] <BUGabundo> for more detail
[13:22] <cyphase> is anyone running intrepid in a VM?
[13:33] <_ZeuZ_> Hi, whenever I try to get my laptop display brightness down, I get the following output: No output has backlight property
[13:34] <BUGabundo> _ZeuZ_: I guess you are one for the schema problem
[13:34] <BUGabundo> on gconf-editor
[13:35] <_ZeuZ_> BUGabundo, so I can manage to fix it from gconf-editor?
[13:35] <BUGabundo> I don't know
[13:35] <BUGabundo> I'm still waiting for my power schema to get fix too
[13:36] <_ZeuZ_> lol, I guess I can manage to fix it importing the Debian package, as with it it works
[13:37] <BUGabundo> don't know
[13:37] <BUGabundo> if you do, let me know
[13:37] <BUGabundo> do you have a LP bug for it?
[13:37] <_ZeuZ_> not yet...
[13:38] <BUGabundo> let me see if I can find mine
[13:38] <_ZeuZ_> still I'm trying to find another configuration editor, as the problem with editing schemes seems to be from gconf-editor
[13:39] <BUGabundo> _ZeuZ_: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-power-manager/+bug/242665
[13:45] <_ZeuZ_> My problem is that gconf doesn't allow me to edit the configuration schemes
[13:59] <lukehasnoname> now running no-internet upgrade from Hardy to Alpha 2
[13:59] <lukehasnoname> er alpha3
[13:59] <Pici> good luck
[14:00] <lukehasnoname> thanks
[14:01] <exco> is the ati restricted driver (fglrx) already working with Xserver 8.4?
[14:01] <Pici> Not on my system, it still complains about dri2.
[14:02] <exco> thanks - I thought I had something wrong because there are so little complaints about it on ubuntuforums
[14:20] <lukehasnoname> soooooo, trying to boot intrepid, my computer started beeping OBNOXIOUSLY LOUDLY and the whole office looked over at me
[14:20] <Pici> Mine made screetching noises.
[14:20] <lukehasnoname> basically ya
[14:20] <Hobbsee> blacklist the pc speaker.
[14:21] <lukehasnoname> how
[14:21] <Pici> its snd_pcsp iirc.
[14:23] <Hobbsee> edit /etc/modprobe.d/blacklist
[14:23] <Hobbsee> Pici: yeah, that sounds right
[14:28] <lukehasnoname> I don't know how to edit that withour booting the OS (I don't have a live disc, and I'm at work so I don't want that to happen again
[14:29] <lukehasnoname> I might just wait til lunch and take it somewhere
[14:32] <oxigen> install it in the elevator
[14:32] <Hobbsee> recovery mode?
[14:33] <lukehasnoname> I don't know if it will beep in recovery mode... I don't want to deal with that again
[14:33] <lukehasnoname> seriously I was fumbling to pull out the battery on my laptop to stop that noice
[14:33] <lukehasnoname> noise
[14:34] <oxigen> tell them that's just a part of the installing process
[14:35] <Pici> Its a sound test ;P
[14:36] <Pici> If its a laptop, take it out of the office for a few minutes
[14:37] <oxigen> yes, on the street, do you have wifi?
[14:37] <lukehasnoname> there is no wifi at this complex
[14:38] <lukehasnoname> and I technically have work to do...
[14:38] <lukehasnoname> heh
[14:38] <oxigen> ok, then use some long cable
[14:40] <exco> or just tell everyone else to leave
[14:41] <lukehasnoname> meh, I'll wait.
[14:41] <lukehasnoname> anyway, I can't wait for Intrepid
[14:43] <lukehasnoname> It might be on the wiki, but are there any goals set for a less buggy compiz experience?
[14:45] <Pici> lukehasnoname: I dont see it on a quick glance, but check here: https://blueprints.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/intrepid
[15:36] <Exilant> Any errors today or is it a good time to dist-upgrade?
[15:42] <kallu> Exilant, there are some problems with kde 4.1
[15:44] <AlmightyCthulhu> Kdesu crashes, Adept crashes no matter what
[15:44] <AlmightyCthulhu> and restricted driver manager doesn't work at all
[15:44] <Exilant> ok, almost never use those anyway
[15:46] <AlmightyCthulhu> hah, finally
[15:46] <AlmightyCthulhu> update that kills off the pc speaker module
[15:47] <Exilant> nice :)
[15:48]  * AlmightyCthulhu has always hated the metapackages for desktops idea
[15:49] <lukehasnoname> NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
[15:49] <AlmightyCthulhu> there should be no need for a separate Kubuntu or Xubuntu really, just sections where you can remove or install packages for each desktop
[15:50] <AlmightyCthulhu> as it is, you really have no choice of what is on the system
[15:50] <Exilant> yes
[15:50] <AlmightyCthulhu> just a one size fits all image you better hope you have a fast net connection with which to fix
[15:50] <Exilant> well, you could remove the metapackages
[15:50] <LSD|Ninja> AlmightyCthulhu: If you want choice, run something else
[15:50] <Exilant> but that + updates->disaster
[15:51] <AlmightyCthulhu> removing the metapackage doesn't help things
[15:51] <AlmightyCthulhu> and it brings in all kinds of dependency nightmares
[15:51] <Exilant> yeah
[15:51] <AlmightyCthulhu> I always thought it was this gross/horrible hack
[15:51] <AlmightyCthulhu> to make the Live CD defaults work
[15:52] <Exilant> yes
[15:52] <AlmightyCthulhu> I have yet to see another system tell you that removing Firefox/Gecko will uninstall half your system
[15:52] <Exilant> i'd like to deinstall OOo for example, but it being in kubuntu-desktop makes that just to maintenance-intensive
[16:14] <Exilant> What is the satus of ati drivers in ibex or in general? is the opensource ati/radeon to be preferred, or the fglrx?
[16:56] <fde> Exilant: I'm fairly sure fglrx still doesn't support xserver 1.5 which is what ibex is using, so your choices are radeon or radeonhd
[16:56] <Exilant> ah, ok thanks
[16:57] <Exilant> is there any new way of setting up radeon or is it the same xorg.conf stuff as before?
[16:57] <fde> Exilant: same
[16:58] <Exilant> ok, thank you
[17:03] <cypherdelic> Third party repos are quite more faster available than i remember in the past ubuntu releases. I firstly updated from hardy to intrepid with only the ubuntu repositories. Now i found 60% of my third partys available in alpha 3 already, damn. Flash-Mozilla works, even if it needed some manual "nspluginwrapper -u *"'s because the script tries nspluginwrapper -n" (what may '-n' be? XD, but thats a third party problem) its quite stable at
[17:03] <cypherdelic> the moment, just some uncritical things are broken
[17:14] <cypherdelic> hm mouse scroll doesnt work in brightness screenlet
[17:17] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: it was working for me
[17:17] <BUGabundo_work> let me check when I get upstairs
[17:22] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: you are right! it stop working in the last few days
[17:22] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: do you have a LP ticket for it yet?
[17:22] <cypherdelic> no could you please take it, i will second it
[17:23] <BUGabundo_work> ok
[17:23] <cypherdelic> im currently in a gimp session :D
[17:23] <BUGabundo_work> ok
[17:26] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: do you have any idea of the package?!?!
[17:26] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: I'm trying to complete bug #200974 but it misses the package
[17:27] <cypherdelic> i dont know either if my package is a ubuntu one, thats why, too
[17:29] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: please subscribe to it, and fill with your details
[17:30] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: bug #200974
[17:31] <cypherdelic> click on +?? i was talking about mouse scroll in "screenlets"!-Brightness-applet, but that one should be similar the the gnome-keybinding issues
[17:32] <BUGabundo_work> me too
[17:32] <BUGabundo_work> I just re-used a similar ticket
[17:32] <BUGabundo_work> please read my comment
[17:32] <cypherdelic> where is this applet lol
[17:32] <BUGabundo_work> you can open/exampd it and see a + and a - minus
[17:33] <cypherdelic> command not found
[17:34] <BUGabundo_work> hu,??
[17:34] <cypherdelic> can you please describe where i have to look for brightness in gnome-power-manager
[17:35] <cypherdelic> that is your bugfile package name
[17:36] <cypherdelic> i regulate brightness with my lcd panel osd ;))
[17:36] <BUGabundo_work> I think its gnome-power-manager
[17:36] <BUGabundo_work> I do it via keyboard
[17:36] <BUGabundo_work>  on my laptop
[17:36] <BUGabundo_work> and with the mouse scroll over that applet
[17:36] <cypherdelic> if i need software brightness, that i use nvidia-settings, quite more comfortable than + - alpha and thats it
[17:37] <cypherdelic> the screelets applet yes
[17:37] <cypherdelic> but thats a bug in screenlets applet
[17:37] <BUGabundo_work> what is screenlets !?!?!?
[17:37] <cypherdelic> do you have a screenlets-intrepid version repo??
[17:37] <BUGabundo_work> I just have an applet on the top bar
[17:37] <cypherdelic> i dont have, so im glad it dont f*** up any other thing :D
[17:38] <cypherdelic> find out the name of that applet
[17:38] <BUGabundo_work> Power Manager Brightness Applet 2.23.1
[17:38] <BUGabundo_work> as I mention on my LP comment
[17:38] <cypherdelic> hmm
[17:39] <cypherdelic> oh i might have an idea what do you mean
[17:39] <cypherdelic> that one in gnome-panel?
[17:39] <BUGabundo_work> I would install screenlets (just saw them on synaptic)
[17:40] <BUGabundo_work> but I'm being affected by a dependcy problem on samba
[17:40] <cypherdelic> hm intrepid
[17:40] <cypherdelic> im confused about my package status
[17:40] <BUGabundo_work> and can't install or remove ANYTHING
[17:40] <BUGabundo_work> why?
[17:40] <cypherdelic> sudo dpkg remove --force
[17:40] <cypherdelic> man dkpg
[17:43] <BUGabundo_work> --force aint working either
[17:45] <cypherdelic> its "sud dpkg samba --purge --force-all" i take no guarantee
[17:45] <cypherdelic> and then install it via synaptic again
[17:46] <cypherdelic> may i can concentrate on gimp please, call center workers got a helper-syndrome
[17:46] <BUGabundo_work> let me try again
[17:46] <BUGabundo_work> ok
[17:46] <BUGabundo_work> bye bye
[18:05] <cypherdelic> so im back smart sharpening pluzgin takes ugly long
[18:05] <cypherdelic> even on a high end processor
[18:06] <cypherdelic> BUGabundo does those samba force purge worked
[18:06] <cypherdelic> ?
[18:06] <BUGabundo> humm
[18:06] <BUGabundo> it cleared a bit
[18:06] <BUGabundo> thanks
[18:06] <BUGabundo> but still in a dependicy hell hole
[18:07] <cypherdelic> hmm
[18:08] <BUGabundo> cypherdelic: see http://paste.ubuntu.com/34115/
[18:12] <lukehasnoname> so in recovery mode I was able to boot into root console without any passowrd
[18:13] <BUGabundo> good for you lukehasnoname
[18:14] <lukehasnoname> I mean,
[18:14] <BUGabundo> I always put a pass on my root user so that doesn't happen
[18:14] <lukehasnoname> is that supposed to happen?
[18:14] <BUGabundo> yep
[18:14] <BUGabundo> its a RECOVERY console
[18:14] <lukehasnoname> tru
[18:15] <BUGabundo> but feel free to do a
[18:15] <BUGabundo> sudo passwd
[18:15] <BUGabundo> and set a strong pass on root
[18:15] <lukehasnoname> right
[18:15] <BUGabundo> and that won't happen again
[18:16] <cypherdelic> lukehasnoname: can you quickguide me on how to tdo that?
[18:16] <cypherdelic> BUGabundo: check your repositories
[18:17] <BUGabundo> lukehasnoname:  sudo passwd
[18:17] <cypherdelic> loooooool
[18:17] <BUGabundo> cypherdelic: why? they look fine and I already did an apt-get clean
[18:17] <cypherdelic> BUgabundooh weill dist-upgrade
[18:17] <cypherdelic> why did ya doo that
[18:17] <cypherdelic> its alpha 3 X)
[18:17] <BUGabundo> I know
[18:17] <BUGabundo> I'm here even before alpha 1
[18:17] <cypherdelic> thats a bad thing
[18:17] <BUGabundo> trying to get my wifi to work
[18:18] <BUGabundo> no luck until now
[18:18] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[18:18] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/230844
[18:18] <BUGabundo_work> wrong copy paste
[18:19] <lukehasnoname> Did the logout screen change in Intrepid?
[18:20] <BUGabundo_work> yep
[18:20] <cypherdelic> and confuzius says to me "what do i say to you?"
[18:20] <BUGabundo_work> went to the upstream BASIC logout
[18:20] <lukehasnoname> boo urns
[18:20] <BUGabundo_work> but devs are working on it
[18:20] <cypherdelic> dist-upgrade is of course right
[18:20] <lukehasnoname> BOO URNS
[18:21] <lukehasnoname> BUGabundo_work: so it's going to go back to Ubuntu-style as final approaches?
[18:21] <cypherdelic> <--x=}
[18:21] <BUGabundo_work> cypherdelic: reboot, so dbus can restart
[18:21] <cypherdelic> nono i did that at the beginning for some days, i tried again, nothing to install ;) mine is fine :D
[18:21] <BUGabundo_work> lukehasnoname: I'll have to check my mailinglist archuive...
[18:22] <lukehasnoname> what mailing list?
[18:22] <BUGabundo_work> but since kmail won't start, I'm going to take longer to get that info for you
[18:22] <lukehasnoname> *which one
[18:22] <BUGabundo_work> desktop if not mistaken
[18:25] <BUGabundo_work> lukehasnoname: can't find it nowhere lol
[18:26] <lukehasnoname> it's cool
[18:26] <cypherdelic> cypher@HackFleisch:~$ /usr/lib/gnome-session/helpers/gnome-login-sound
[18:26] <cypherdelic> (gnome-login-sound:29807): Gnome-WARNING **: error caching sample <-1>!
[18:27] <cypherdelic> can somebody approof?
[18:27] <lukehasnoname> Is there a way to blacklist updates to certain packages permanently?
[18:27] <lukehasnoname> like evolution-*, linux-image-*, etc., where it will never ask me to do such updates again
[18:28] <BUGabundo_work> humm
[18:28] <BUGabundo_work> you can pin back
[18:28] <BUGabundo_work> or force a certain version on synaptic
[18:29] <lukehasnoname> might be what I want
[18:30] <BUGabundo_work> let me see were you put that for apt to pin back
[18:30] <lukehasnoname> I don't want a new kernel every few days, and I don't want to waste bandwidth on updates I don't need
[18:31] <BUGabundo_work> bingo
[18:32] <BUGabundo_work> lukehasnoname: /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/50un....
[18:36] <cypherdelic> Does anyone know how do I load nvidia-settings -l before xserver to make it rendered with antialiasing
[18:37] <lukehasnoname> Anyone else getting the alternate install hanging at 6%
[18:38] <lukehasnoname> nvmd it just sat on 6% for a while then jumped to 29%
[18:39] <tanath> anyone know why mouse scrolling broke?
[18:40] <tanath> worked fine on hardy, but after upgrade my mouse stopped working right. now it scrolls horizontally if available, but not vertically
[18:41] <tanath> unless my mouse cursor is over the scroll bar
[18:45] <BUGabundo_work> tanath: my touchpad didn't scroll either for a few days
[18:45] <BUGabundo_work> but today its woking again
[18:46] <tanath> hm. you update today?
[18:46] <BUGabundo_work> mouse scroll was working fine the all time
[18:46] <BUGabundo_work> the regular updates.. yes
[18:47] <tanath> well i when i upgraded, my thumb buttons stopped working. then when that got fixed, the scroll wheel stopped working
[18:52] <lukehasnoname> so after my upgrade from hardy sucked, I just did a fresh install
[18:52] <lukehasnoname> no internet, so kinda sucks, but so far it seem stable enough
[18:57] <BUGabundo_work> lukehasnoname: I guess I'll have to do a clean install by the time beta comes out
[18:57] <BUGabundo_work> I only hope I manage to get my wifi working until then
[19:12] <clusty> hey
[19:12] <clusty> is there something funny going on with compiz?
[19:12] <clusty> the transparencies are all screwy
[19:13] <crdlb> "screwy"?
[19:13] <clusty> as if i had no 3d accel
[19:13] <clusty> normally one seens the window behibnd the terminal
[19:13] <clusty> now i always see the desktop
[19:14] <crdlb> that's your definition of "screwy" ?
[19:14] <crdlb> that happens when you open gnome-terminal while no compositing manager is running
[19:14] <crdlb> currently, it cannot switch transparency modes while running
[19:15] <clusty> ohhh damn.
[19:15] <clusty> makes sense :D
[19:15] <clusty> sorry for the noobish bother :D
[19:15] <crdlb> it's ok; it's very broken :)
[19:16] <clusty> considering what fixed and what broke i am still not regretting going alpha
[19:16] <clusty> f-spot finally stopped crashing
[19:16] <clusty> and close to rock solid suspends
[19:16] <clusty> but no more keyboard shortcuts with compiz and no more bluetooth mouse :D
[19:39] <dj_oko> hello
[19:39] <dj_oko> could anybody tell me will new Ubuntu include PackageKit?
[19:39] <dj_oko> it seems to be "suggested"
[19:43] <james_w> dj_oko: it's very likely
[19:43] <james_w> however the gui tools will not be installed by default
[19:44] <dj_oko> h
[19:45] <dj_oko> i see :)
[19:59] <nemo> http://www.debianhelp.org/node/5156 - this post appears to suggest the patches I need for my CPU will be in 2.6.22
[19:59] <nemo> is that kernel version a target for "Ibex" ?
[20:12] <joaopinto> nemo, 2.6.24
[20:12] <nemo> coool
[20:14] <lukehasnoname> ?
[20:14] <lukehasnoname> 2.6.26 is the kernel for 8.10
[20:38] <nemo> waitasec. yeah. you're right
[20:38] <nemo> WTH.
[20:38] <nemo> hm. back to squre one then
[20:39] <nemo> (hardy is indeed on .24)
[20:41] <nemo> found correct but
[20:41] <nemo> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/235119
[20:41] <nemo> indeed, is outdated in .24 as well
[21:57] <lukehasnoname> Reinstalling Hardy
[21:57] <lukehasnoname> man, running an alpha really makes you appreciate the stable release
[22:14] <kallu> I was unable to download the plasmoids through plasmoid panel .. The wizard is showing the plasmoids available in kde-look.org but unable to install them.
[23:16] <happytiger>  I cant move my kde4 widgets using nvidia-glx driver but I can if I use standard xorg setting after having run dpkg-reconfigure -phigh xserver-xorg
[23:17] <happytiger> is there a workaround?


[21:53] <eamonn> Hello there! I was just going to upgrade to the latest Lubuntu and realized that 19.10 is in beta anyway...
[21:53] <eamonn> Anything I should know before jumping into testing? Is there some pre-beta-testing Readme I should check out?
[21:58] <eamonn> Ok, thanks, will do!
[21:59] <wxl> eamonn: also head over to #lubuntu-devel where all the fun development/testing discussion happens
 Read the release notes of the beta
[21:59] <wxl> see also https://phab.lubuntu.me/w/testing/
[22:44] <xrandr2> Hmm...got a lubuntu install to work :)
[22:47]  * xrandr2 does a happy dance
[22:48] <n-iCe> :D
[22:57] <xrandr2> I just wish this laptop monitor had a higher screen resolution. I like the 1920x1280 resolution :)
[23:19] <Mead> it is amazing how laptop manufactures keep putting sub 1080p screens in laptops these days.  Was looking for laptops the other day, sooo many 17inch 1600X900 laptops


[00:04] <ahoneybun> heyo
[00:05] <ahoneybun> balloons: do you handle the iso.qa site?
[00:06] <ahoneybun> the Kubuntu Beta 2 both 32 and 64 have daily-live links for http
[00:06] <ahoneybun> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds/131689/downloads
[00:06] <ahoneybun> http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/367/builds/131690/downloads
[00:06] <ahoneybun> this would be the right link: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/releases/yakkety/beta-2/
[00:14] <tsimonq2> ahoneybun: well you don't download the links from the ISO QA site
[00:14] <tsimonq2> ahoneybun: that's for testing
[00:14] <ahoneybun> that makes no sense
[00:15] <ahoneybun> we report results based on that image
[00:15] <tsimonq2> ahoneybun: they are meant to be ephemeral for testing
[00:15] <ahoneybun> if we get the wrong image or a dead link to
[00:15] <tsimonq2> ahoneybun: 2 days and they are dead
[00:15] <tsimonq2> that's because you're testing the daily
[00:15] <ahoneybun> either way they are dead links
[00:15] <tsimonq2> /beta-2/ is published after it's released
[00:16] <ahoneybun> you don't see the issue
[00:16] <tsimonq2> ahoneybun: that's intended and I don't see it changing
[00:16] <tsimonq2> I do see what you're saying
[00:16] <tsimonq2> and like I said, intended
[00:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.3-0ubuntu3 => 2.3-0ubuntu4] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[00:48] <stgraber> bunch of bugfixes for LXD if anyone's around ^
[00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (yakkety-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-0ubuntu4]
[00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.379]
[00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libgweather [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.3-1ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [armhf] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [powerpc] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [s390x] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-azure-sdk [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [arm64] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [ppc64el] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ktp-call-ui [i386] (yakkety-proposed) [16.04.3-0ubuntu1]
[00:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-azure-storage [amd64] (yakkety-proposed) [0.33.0-1]
[01:15] <lamont> apw: doh.
[01:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.29ubuntu1 => 0.29ubuntu1.1] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[01:20] <lamont> apw: or whoever: I lose access to the hardware for verification monday morning (for at least all of monday) -- if that can land sometime before sun afternoon, it's likely I can test it before I don't have hardware access to do so.  thanks
[01:36] <stgraber> lamont: version number looks a bit odd for an upload to the dev release
[01:40] <stgraber> lamont: if you're still around, can I have you re-upload this as ubuntu2 and I'll let it in
[01:40] <stgraber> lamont: diff otherwise looks good to me, so just version number nitpick :)
[01:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-0ubuntu4]
[01:56] <lamont> stgraber: fine
[01:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected cloud-initramfs-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.29ubuntu1.1]
[01:59] <lamont> stgraber: your lxd fix for me made it into at least yakkety-proposed, yes?
[01:59] <stgraber> should be in yakkety proper by now, yeah
[01:59] <lamont> cool
[01:59] <lamont> which means I can build pure -proposed, without my ppa, for testing
[02:00] <lamont> Successfully uploaded packages.
[02:00]  * lamont goes back to the grill.
[02:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-initramfs-tools (yakkety-proposed/main) [0.29ubuntu1 => 0.29ubuntu2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[02:01] <stgraber> cool, will let it in as soon as LP gives me a diff
[02:07] <lamont> ta
[02:07]  * lamont afk, back in the mornintg.
[02:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-initramfs-tools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.29ubuntu2]
[02:18] <tsimonq2> hmm, can I find a list of packagesets somewhere?
[02:18] <tsimonq2> the API is causing me trouble :/
[02:18] <stgraber> http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/packagesets/
[02:19] <tsimonq2> if only that would be linked somewhere more obvious...
[02:19] <tsimonq2> thanks stgraber! :)
[02:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vino (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.8.1-0ubuntu11 => 3.8.1-0ubuntu12] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vino (xenial-proposed/main) [3.8.1-0ubuntu9.1 => 3.8.1-0ubuntu9.2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[04:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libvisca (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1.1 => 1.0.1-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvisca [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.1-1.1ubuntu1]
[04:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtuxcap (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.4.0.dfsg2-2.2build1 => 1.4.0.dfsg2-2.3] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libtuxcap [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.4.0.dfsg2-2.3]
[04:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-user-share (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.14.2-2ubuntu4 => 3.14.2-2ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemtap (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.0-6 => 3.0-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemtap [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.0-7]
[06:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autopkgtest (yakkety-proposed/main) [4.0.5ubuntu1 => 4.1] (core) (sync)
[06:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: supercollider-sc3-plugins (yakkety-proposed/universe) [3.7.1~repack-1 => 3.7.1~repack-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted supercollider-sc3-plugins [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [3.7.1~repack-2]
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mandos (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.7.10-1 => 1.7.11-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[06:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mandos [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.7.11-1]
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtpproxy (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-2.1ubuntu1 => 1.2.1-2.2] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rtpproxy [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.2.1-2.2]
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: transifex-client (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.11.1+git15~g655c5e9-1 => 0.11.1+git15~g655c5e9-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[07:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted transifex-client [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [0.11.1+git15~g655c5e9-1.1]
[07:12] <Mirv> if qtbase-opensource-src could be let in to yakkety-proposed, it could use the currently free autopkgtest infra
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lernid (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.0.4 => 1.0.7] (no packageset)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lernid [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.7]
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (yakkety-proposed/main) [231-9 => 231-9git1] (core)
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [4.1]
[08:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-user-share [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.14.2-2ubuntu5]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vino [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.8.1-0ubuntu12]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qtbase-opensource-src [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [5.6.1+dfsg-3ubuntu6~4]
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted systemd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [231-9git1]
[08:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: synaptic (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.83 => 0.83+nmu1ubuntu1] (lubuntu)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evolution-indicator (yakkety-proposed/universe) [0.2.20-0ubuntu27 => 0.2.20-0ubuntu28] (no packageset)
[09:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mail-notification (yakkety-proposed/universe) [5.4.dfsg.1-14build3 => 5.4.dfsg.1-14build4] (no packageset)
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution-indicator [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.2.20-0ubuntu28]
[09:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mail-notification [source] (yakkety-proposed) [5.4.dfsg.1-14build4]
[09:11] <Mirv> (thank you)
[09:27] <jbicha> could kdegraphics-mobipocket be accepted from the yakkety rejected queue? I see that okular depends on the new version
[09:29] <jbicha> I'll let someone else try to sort out the other kde stuff
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-keyring (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.20.0-2ubuntu3 => 3.20.0-2ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (yakkety-proposed/main) [3.20.2-1ubuntu4 => 3.20.2-1ubuntu5] (ubuntu-desktop)
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-keyring [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.0-2ubuntu4]
[15:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synaptic [source] (yakkety-proposed) [0.83+nmu1ubuntu1]
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sdformat (yakkety-proposed/universe) [4.1.0-2build1 => 4.1.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sdformat [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [4.1.1-1]
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gazebo (yakkety-proposed/universe) [7.3.0+dfsg-6build1 => 7.3.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gazebo [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [7.3.1+dfsg-1]
[18:35] <lamont> does cloud-initramfs-tools_0.27ubuntu1.1 show up in the xenial queue?
[18:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.3-0ubuntu4 => 2.3-0ubuntu5] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[18:38] <stgraber> yep
[18:38] <stgraber> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/xenial/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.2-1ubuntu5]
[18:46] <lamont> stgraber: can you mkae it land in -proposed?
[18:47] <lamont> and I suspect that open-iscsi/yakkety-proposed might not be a regression any more, if the test gets retried.  Though I'd start with just retrying the open-iscsi biuld test, not all of them (zomg)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-initramfs-tools [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.27ubuntu1.1]
[18:48] <lamont> ta
[18:49] <stgraber> accepted the SRU and re-tried open-iscsi in yakkety (can't retry just a single test)
[18:49] <lamont> that'll let me test and +1 the SRU pile for xenial
[18:49] <lamont> figures
[18:49] <lamont> and thanks
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcl (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.8.0+dfsg1-3ubuntu2 => 1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcl [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.8.0+dfsg1-4ubuntu1]
[18:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-0ubuntu5]
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd (yakkety-proposed/main) [2.3-0ubuntu4 => 2.3-0ubuntu5] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netatalk (yakkety-proposed/universe) [2.2.5-1ubuntu1 => 2.2.5-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netatalk [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.5-1.1]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gmusicbrowser (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1.15~ds0-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.15~ds0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gmusicbrowser [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.15~ds0-1]
[19:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.3-0ubuntu5]
[19:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brag (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-2 => 1.4.1-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brag [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.4.1-2ubuntu1]
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: log4cpp (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-1 => 1.1.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted log4cpp [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.1.1-3]
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clustalo (yakkety-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-1 => 1.2.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clustalo [sync] (yakkety-proposed) [1.2.3-1]