[07:10] <dpm> good morning all
[07:11] <ajmitch> hi dpm
[07:12] <dpm> hey ajmitch :)
[07:15] <ajmitch> how are you today?
[07:33] <dpm> fine, thanks, just came back from a short break and I'm getting ready for uds :)
[07:33] <dpm> how about you?
[08:01]  * ajmitch is ok, got far too much to get done before uds  :)
[08:08] <dpm> I've given up on Inbox 0, but I'll do my best before uds :)
[08:10] <ajmitch> heh
[08:36] <dpm> wow, this guy even submitted a video along with this lens: https://myapps.developer.ubuntu.com/dev/apps/811/
[08:37] <ajmitch> that's pretty cool
[08:38] <ajmitch> it does show that unity doesn't screencapture wonderfully :)
[08:40] <dpm> not sure about it being unity's fault. Last time I tried screencasting was on 11.10, and it worked perfectly :)


[03:29] <siretart> we are trying to build a custom kernel based on the ubuntu kernel sources
[03:29] <siretart> the problem:
[03:29] <siretart> vmhost:~# modprobe ide-core
[03:30] <siretart> ide_core: Unknown symbol touch_nmi_watchdog
[03:30] <siretart> FATAL: Error inserting ide_core (/lib/modules/<IP_ADDRESS>-ubuntu1-fai-kernels/kernel/drivers/ide/ide-core.ko): Unknown symbol in module, parameter (see dmesg)
[03:30] <siretart> does anyone has an idea which kernel option must not be selected as module but must be compiled in for this to work?
[03:39] <fabbione> CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC
[03:40] <gnomefreak> what are chances of initramfs-tool causing an unstable interneet connection?
[03:41] <fabbione> 0
[03:41] <gnomefreak> so i should still expect the issue
[03:41] <tfheen> -5, more likely.
[03:41] <gnomefreak> it hasnt happened since the initramfs-tools update
[03:46] <makx> fabbione: thanks for the edgy i-t fixes :)
[03:46] <fabbione> i-t???
[03:46] <makx> oh ups it was infinity sorry
[03:46] <fabbione> ah
[03:46] <makx> initramfs-tools
[04:26] <infinity> makx: Cnofusing me with Fabio is pretty hard...
[04:26] <infinity> makx: He's, like, 12 times my size.
[04:29] <fabbione> infinity: and 12 times prettier
[04:29] <fabbione> :)
[04:29] <infinity> Uh huh.
[04:31] <zul> heh
[04:37] <infinity> zul: I'll bug you another day about whatever it was I wanted to bug you about...   Just very frustrated.
[07:36] <Keybuk> you can imagine how the developers feel?
[07:36] <Trae> It's a classic example of "Works for me"
[07:36] <Trae> heh
[07:37] <Keybuk> your mail read like "IF THIS ISN'T FIXED, I'M NEVER USING UBUNTU AGAIN!"
[07:37] <Trae> If it doesn't affect you, life is good. :)
[07:37] <Trae> I never said that
[07:37] <Keybuk> no, but that's how it read
[07:37] <Trae> no...
[07:37] <Keybuk> look at the last line of your mail
[07:37] <Trae> It was... a "I really love Ubuntu and hate to have to even THINK about using anything else" post.
[07:38] <Trae> yeah... have they dealt with the bug, or have they switched distro's.  There are only two options.
[07:39] <Keybuk> you say yourself that most other distros are also affected by this bug
[07:39] <Trae> Either deal with the bug, or use another distro.  There is no grey area there.
[07:39] <Trae> At any rate.
[07:39] <Trae> yah
[07:39] <Trae> that is true
[07:39] <Trae> Keybuk, the odd thing is, it was working with Breezy before hand.  :/
[07:39] <Trae> anyway
[07:39] <Trae> Is there someone that can help me compile a new kernel?
[07:39] <Keybuk> right
[07:39] <Keybuk> this is a kernel problem
[07:40] <Keybuk> or more likely an ACPI virtual machine problem
[07:40] <Trae> I know this isn't the "Help Trae with kernel issues" channel
[07:40] <Keybuk> it really needs a line-by-line diff of a kernel that works and a kernel that doesn't
[07:40] <Keybuk> trying different patches until one finds the line of code that breaks/fixes it
[07:40] <Trae> Keybuk, yeah, and that sounds scary.
[07:40] <Keybuk> it is scary
[07:40] <Keybuk> your bug is scary
[07:41] <Keybuk> if you had a nice, simple one like "Applications is spelt wrong" then it would be easy :p
[07:41] <Trae> haha
[07:41] <Keybuk> can you get to Mountain View in a couple of weeks time?
[07:41] <Trae> heh
[07:41] <Keybuk> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelCustomBuild
[07:41] <Trae> I've been  unemployed for about 3 months
[07:41] <Trae> doubt I can afford to fly out to Mtnview
[07:42] <Trae> Would  love to....
[07:45] <Trae> from the wiki: You got to this page by mistake, but checked it out because it looked interesting. Believe me, this isn't interesting at all
[07:45] <Trae> haha
[08:58] <zul> argh...i was 4 tickets away from winning a raffle
[09:09] <Infecto> hi all
[09:09] <Infecto> thanks for repering bug :) https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+bug/65005
[09:10] <Infecto> in part only :)
[09:10] <Infecto>      Thermal 1: active[1] , 55.0 degrees C
[09:10] <Infecto>      Thermal 2: ok, 56.0 degrees C
[09:10] <Infecto>      Thermal 3: ok, 21.0 degrees C
[09:10] <Infecto> Thermal 2 should be active to
[09:11] <mjg59> Why?
[09:12] <mjg59> What are its trip points?
[09:12] <Infecto> its to hoot
[09:12] <Infecto> to to to
[09:12] <Infecto> and works difrend when i restart
[09:13] <Infecto> after resume forms suspend to ram the steps are changing
[09:14] <mjg59> What are thermal 2's trip points?
[09:14] <Infecto> critical (S5): 115C
[09:15] <mjg59> So no, thermal 2 shouldn't be active
[09:15] <Infecto> ehn i restart it will be
[09:15] <Infecto> when
[09:15] <Infecto> 115 its to much
[09:15] <mjg59> I don't think that information means what you think it means
[09:16] <Infecto> hmm
[09:16] <Infecto> but the true is that the steps are changing when i restart