[18:48] <marcoceppi> Is this the best place to ask questions about bzrlib?
[18:54] <LarstiQ> marcoceppi: or possibly the mailing list
[18:56] <marcoceppi> Well, I guess I'll just ask, is there any way to "close" a RemoteBranch in bzrlib? I keep getting Connection Timeout messages after opening a RemoteBranch


[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26 => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntustudio)
[02:15] <tsimonq2> wxl, Eickmeyer: We don't even have base-files or distro-info-data yet, I think lxd-installer just made it to the queue first ;)
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: noble -> oracular file copy is in progress. I have `ubuntustudio-installer` in oracular already with matching versions.
[02:17] <Eickmeyer> You don't have to be on the same release to upload to it.
[02:49] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: I know that all too well, just a matter of "the queue isn't even ready yet"
[02:50] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: "DON'T TELL ME WHAT I KNOW, TRAVIS!" --Some animal in Zootopia
[02:50] <tsimonq2> hah
[02:56] <tsimonq2> I'll check back in the morning, but my Oracular list is as follows (probably in this order): lintian, vim, devscripts, debootstrap. At the very least, devscripts and debootstrap need distro-info built and published in -proposed before accepting, the former two can be done any time.
[02:56] <tsimonq2> I'd also like to start a Qt 6 transition ASAP, although I'm willing to wait for official archive opening on that one.
[02:58] <tsimonq2> (Re: Qt 6, the choices are either "bootstrap in Bileto" or "bootstrap in the archive" - more details can be found here: https://qt-kde-team.pages.debian.net/qt6-build-deps.html - specifically "packages must be built without arch:all until qttools is available")
[04:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nbd (noble-proposed/main) [1:3.26.1-1build1 => 1:3.26.1-1ubuntu0.1] (ubuntu-server)
[09:38] <danilogondolfo> ubuntu-sru: may I ask you to reject netplan.io from jammy and mantic sru queues, please? I need to fix a little thing in the changelog...
[10:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~23.10.1]
[10:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware-xilinx-ap1302 [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:2.0-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (noble-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.60ubuntu0.1] (core)
[12:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (mantic-proposed/main) [0.58ubuntu0.2 => 0.58ubuntu0.3] (core)
[12:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (jammy-proposed/main) [0.52ubuntu0.6 => 0.52ubuntu0.7] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (focal-proposed/main) [0.43ubuntu1.15 => 0.43ubuntu1.16] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:37] <Trevinho> bdmurray: could please check https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=gnome-shell-extension-appindicator ? Bugs should all have the SRU template now
[12:39] <Trevinho> I guess I've to upload the same to Oracular though, or will be that copied over automatically (being in queue for a while?)
[12:55] <Skia> b_dmurray is afk this week, fyi Trevinho :-)
[12:56] <Trevinho> Skia: Oh, I see I just checked he was on SRU duties on wiki... Well, someone else from the SRU team then when have time :)
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, I would like to make abseil build before opening if possible :)
[14:11] <LocutusOfBorg> it was a transition nacked on noble due to freeze, better do it for okular
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: abseil (oracular-proposed/main) [20220623.1-3.1ubuntu3 => 20230802.1-4] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[14:18] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, hey :), let me know when you are planning a libreoffice rebuild, I can upload a new release candidate instead
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, ^^ if they approve abseil, it would be a good timing :)
[14:21] <LocutusOfBorg> I remember there were some reasons to do it with opening, and probably LO was the reason
[14:22] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, I will be afk for a few hours, so let me know :)
[14:24] <LocutusOfBorg> honestly I don't know if oracular is open or not
[14:25] <LocutusOfBorg> and if toolchain updates are planned on opening
[14:26] <ricotz> I was just mentioning it to avoid a no-change rebuild, don't worry
[14:28] <LocutusOfBorg> yeah, and for sure I will ask you when the package is published, I don't like to fetch/upload LO, takes a lot of bandwith
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> also poco was rejected https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/poco/1.13.0-6
[14:30] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe it can be re-accepted during opening
[15:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (mantic-proposed/main) [0.107-5ubuntu0.2 => 0.107.1-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netplan.io (jammy-proposed/main) [0.106.1-7ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 0.107.1-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[15:07] <slyon> ^ the old uploads from 2024-03-21 should be dropped (CC danilogondolfo, sil2100)
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netplan.io [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.107.1-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:03] <apw> slyon, ^
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (oracular-proposed/main) [2.117.0ubuntu1 => 2.117.0ubuntu2] (core)
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ucf (jammy-proposed/main) [3.0043 => 3.0043ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: distro-info-data (oracular-proposed/main) [0.60 => 0.62] (core) (sync)
[16:48] <tsimonq2> kajiya_, bdrung: ^
[16:48] <tsimonq2> I caught it just as Launchpad picked it up :)
[16:49] <kajiya_> woop woop, awesome! Thank you tsimonq2 :)
[16:49] <tsimonq2> of course :)
[16:51] <bdrung> then only the SRUs need to be accepted
[16:52] <tsimonq2> bdrung: Do you happen to know if there's a plan for base-files?
[16:52] <tsimonq2> Ah looks like I was wrong about debootstrap needing an upload, thanks LocutusOfBorg ;)
[16:53] <bdrung> tsimonq2, sorry, no. I don't know who takes care of base-files usually
[16:55] <tsimonq2> I found this: https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1612
[16:56] <tsimonq2> Just took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1683 and https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1684 - bdrung it looks like you took care of https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 (which should probably be specific to distro-info-data)
[16:57] <bdrung> https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1649 is about at least distro-info-data and base-files
[16:58] <tsimonq2> Ah, cool. Also looks like it's unassigned.
[17:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7build1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: base-files (oracular-proposed/main) [13ubuntu10 => 13ubuntu11] (core, i386-whitelist)
[17:07] <tsimonq2> I was pretty careful with that one (cross-ref'ed with Noble's first base-files upload), but I'd encourage another thorough look ^^^^
[17:13] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: Please only accept devscripts once distro-info-data and base-files have built in oracular-proposed. :)
[17:33] <tsimonq2> Vim looks happy in my PPA: https://launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/+archive/ubuntu/oracular-test/+packages
[17:33] <tsimonq2> uploaded
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (oracular-proposed/main) [2:9.1.0016-1ubuntu7 => 2:9.1.0377-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpkg (oracular-proposed/main) [1.22.6ubuntu6 => 1.22.6ubuntu8] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:09] <tsimonq2> Transition tracker switched to Oracular: https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-transition-trackers/ubuntu-transition-tracker/configs/revision/1108
[19:10] <tsimonq2> bdrung, mapreri: Upload of devscripts to Unstable with this, maybe? https://salsa.debian.org/debian/devscripts/-/commit/827bc068609f1b55866265ca2f9433248f062aa6
[19:10] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 827bc06 in debian/devscripts "scripts/reproducible-check: reformat with black 24.2"
[19:10] <tsimonq2> My NCR just failed in the PPA, that commit fixes it, I don't like introducing devscripts deltas.
[19:10] <tsimonq2> (But I probably will, in this case. :P)
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pytest-flake8 (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-4 => 1.1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: devscripts (oracular-proposed/main) [2.23.7 => 2.23.7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:23] <vorlon> Trevinho: can you please add an SRU template to bug #2059819?
[20:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2059819 in gnome-shell (Ubuntu) "Regression: Jammy to Noble, right clicking on some icons shows dropdown on left side of screen" [Undecided, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2059819
[20:24] <vorlon> Trevinho: er sorry hold on
[20:24] <vorlon> Trevinho: apparently it's there and I needed to refresh!
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-appindicator [source] (noble-proposed) [58-1]
[20:28] <Trevinho> vorlon: yeah, it should be there :)
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (oracular-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.39 => 1:24.10.1] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-artwork (oracular-proposed/universe) [24.04.6 => 24.10.1] (lubuntu)
[20:32] <tsimonq2> ^^^ s/noble/oracular/ and s/24.04 LTS/24.10/
[20:42] <liushuyu> should someone change the topic of this channel now that OO is open?
[20:43] <vorlon> it's not actually open, we're in archive-opening freeze
[20:44] <tsimonq2> ^^^ I'm just doing what I can to help out with that :)
[20:45] <dbungert> liushuyu: did you find while working on LP: #2059856 that you had a hang in package build due to a wayward gdbserver process?  This also happens for me in the current jammy version, so I don't think it's related to your change.
[20:45] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2059856 in gdb (Ubuntu) "gdb 10.0 fails to examine any global variables in D programs" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2059856
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (noble-proposed) [2024a-3ubuntu1]
[20:47] <vorlon> bdrung: how does your ziguard.awk change in mantic (for which there is no linked bug) relate to the noble SRU?
[21:08] <bdrung> vorlon, the ziguard.awk change was done to address all cases of bug #2055718
[21:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2055718
[21:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-software [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-4]
[21:12] <liushuyu> dbungert: which package was that? I don't recall there was a hang, since I do have a PPA build for the patched version https://launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/+archive/ubuntu/gdb-testing/+packages
[21:12] <vorlon> bdrung: yet, this exact patch (ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch) shows up in the delta of the *noble* SRU as having been removed as part of fixing the C++ crashes?
[21:14] <liushuyu> If the target platform is arm64/armhf, then you might be interested in https://bugs.launchpad.net/gdb/+bug/2041396
[21:14] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2041396 in gdb (Ubuntu Jammy) "gdb 12.1 generates SIGILL on armhf" [Undecided, Incomplete]
[21:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-apt [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.8.0]
[21:16] <bdrung> vorlon, now I get your question. ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch was my first approach to fix the wrong symlinks, but that causes links pointing to links. Correct-timezone-symlinks-when-using-BACKWARD-backward-PA.patch is the second and less invasive approach.
[21:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (noble-proposed) [2.28.1-0ubuntu3]
[21:17] <vorlon> bdrung: ok but ziguard.awk-Move-link-to-link-feature-from-vanguard-to-ma.patch is in the mantic debdiff, does this mean it should be rejected?
[21:18] <bdrung> vorlon, yes please. I thought the SRU uploads for 2055718 were rejected (mantic was probably missed).
[21:18] <vorlon> bdrung: ack
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected tzdata [source] (mantic-proposed) [2024a-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openvswitch [source] (noble-proposed) [3.3.0-1ubuntu2]
[21:19] <bdrung> let me prepare the v2 patches for bug #2055718
[21:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2055718 in tzdata (Ubuntu Mantic) "timezone changed unexpectedly from EST to America/Adak or America/Indiana/Indianapolis" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2055718
[21:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (noble-proposed) [46.0-1ubuntu4.1]
[21:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tzdata (mantic-proposed/main) [2024a-0ubuntu0.23.10 => 2024a-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist)
[21:35] <bdrung> vorlon, here you go ^
[21:50] <vorlon> bdrung: cheers (I'm not on SRU duty today though, I'm only doing cleanup of pre-release noble uploads in unapproved and it told me about there being a version in mantic also which is why I looked)
[21:52] <liushuyu> dbungert: were you building on your local ARM device or Launchpad?
[21:52] <dbungert> amd64 gdb jammy
[21:53] <bdrung> the jammy SRU will need to wait for the next working day. the Python test case complains (I need to check what is the difference between mantic/noble and jammy there)
[21:53] <liushuyu> dbungert: on the physical device or a container/VM? I can try to reproduce the issue
[21:54] <dbungert> liushuyu: sbuild on a physical device
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [sync] (oracular-proposed) [0.62]
[21:58] <liushuyu> dbungert: Thanks! I am testing the build with sbuild
[22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (noble-proposed) [0.60ubuntu0.1]
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.58ubuntu0.3]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.52ubuntu0.7]
[22:03] <vorlon> bdrung: ^ as soon as those can get verified, I'll publish them to -updates
[22:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted distro-info-data [source] (focal-proposed) [0.43ubuntu1.16]
[22:12] <bdrung> vorlon, how long does it take for the builds to propagate to the mirrors normally?
[22:14] <vorlon> bdrung: ~1h in total
[22:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (oracular-proposed/main) [1.5.3-5ubuntu5 => 1.5.3-7ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:33] <dbungert> vorlon: ^
[22:47] <liushuyu> dbungert: that runaway gdbserver keeps restarting itself due to unable to initiate a session, I can investigate this
[23:55] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Thanks for the distro-info-data acceptance :)


[04:37] <mup> Bug #1624118 changed: Primary DNS entry for a node ends up using wrong address <MAAS:Expired> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1624118>


[08:19] <czajkowski> aloha
[08:24] <popey> Morning!
[15:03] <czajkowski> popey: dholbach on sprint?
[15:07] <popey> czajkowski: you missing him?
[15:07] <popey> (he is on holiday)
[15:08] <czajkowski> aye :(
[16:15] <jono> mhall119, is dpm away?
[17:00] <mhall119> jono: yeah, this week, back next I think
[17:00] <mhall119> jono: did you need something?
[17:10] <jono> mhall119, nope, we just have a weekly call
[17:10] <jono> will sync with him next week
[18:20] <jose> jono: hey, mind a quick PM?
[18:21] <jono> jose, sure
[18:21] <jono> top though
[18:21] <jose> ?