[00:28] <styles> Hey guys I'm trying to install JuJu on 14.04 LTS and I'm running into issues. Created new user, gave them sudoers, ran juju quickstart -i .. generated everything. First issue was it threw "undefined symbol: cgmanager_get_pid_cgroup_abs_sync" assumged it was some LXC thing .. upgraded system .. but now it's just stuck at retrieving the enviorment status
[00:28] <styles> (been there for a few minutes)
[01:53] <marcoceppi> styles: that's...weird
[01:53] <marcoceppi> what version of juju are you using?
[01:53] <styles> latest


[09:04] <freedom07> anyone on 11.10 beta's? or daily builds yet?
[10:13] <swat_> hi all!
[10:14] <swat_> just started testing lubuntu on my samsung nc10
[10:14] <swat_> really really impressed how fast it is compared to the standard unity based desktop
[11:33] <freedom07> lubuntu 11.10 daily build is looking good
[12:51] <dr-lee> hi
[12:52] <dr-lee> is there a security problem downloading lubuntu-11.04.iso as torrent when transmission warns: unregistered torrent?
[12:54] <c933103> ...if transmission report this problem it usually just mean the torrent not registered to the tracker server?
[12:55] <dr-lee> yes....but why ??
[12:55] <dr-lee> is this a security ploblem for me?
[12:57] <c933103> ..it is most probably server-side problem.....although i don't know if it really is or not..
[13:00] <dr-lee> thats the point
[13:00] <dr-lee> no information on the net
[13:01] <dr-lee> maybe its because kernel.org was hacked
[13:04] <szczur> unregistered torent  meand that the tracker don't know anything about the torrent and doesn't know the clients seeding/leeching that file. such tracker is useless i think. Most of time i remove them from list because they won't help in downloading the file
[13:04] <szczur> you can wait, maybe it will be back somehow
[13:05] <dr-lee> k
[13:05] <dr-lee> thanks
[13:05] <szczur> i don't think that's a security concern
[13:08] <dr-lee> good to know
[13:08] <dr-lee> its just downloading...but just says unregistered
[13:09] <dr-lee> i am using torrent download because i ve heradt that torrent is more secure because it has its own data integrety check
[13:19] <c933103> ...even bot usibg torrent you can still perform the data integrety check by using the code which i forget its name.. ..
[13:26] <phillw> c933103: md5 file checksum :)
[13:26] <c933103> O yes..
[13:27] <KM0201> phillw: did something happen during a lubuntu update?
[13:28] <KM0201> if i turn on my machine, and it boots w/o me choosing the first grub option (default). it boots, and my theme, et.c. is totally different (looks like traditional lxde, rather than lubuntu)... all my programs are there, only thing different is the theme, wallpaper setting, icons, etc.. if i boot, and actually hit "enter" on the first grub option, it boots lubuntu as I've had it for the last 6mo.
[16:14] <Neosano> Hello. Just installed lubuntu software center on my 10.10 machine.. hmm, why I can't select more than one application in the "Get Software" tab, and why there's no "Quick Install" button to install applications without going to the basket thing?
[21:45] <iqpi> hi guys, Do you know how could I stop de X server on lubuntu? I've tried killall lxsession from tty, entering runlevel 3 etc, and nothing worked :S
[21:53] <jmarsden> iqpi: sudo service lxdm stop
[21:54] <iqpi> jmarsden: thank you very much, i'm archlinux user and i am not related to this new ways to stop daemons
[21:54] <jmarsden> iqpi: You're welcome.


[04:20] <studio-user907> join
[04:21] <studio-user907> want to record music
[08:42] <boblamont> I installed mixxx 1.10.1 in lubuntu 14.04 and when I try to launch it from the Sound & Video menu, nothing happens (I can launch mixxx from the terminal, but I think pasuspender should also run)
[23:00] <Rusty> hello!
[23:01] <Guest92860> I have a question, but I haven't been able to find it in the FAQ: how can I re-center the loading screen throbber and title?
[23:01] <Guest92860> currently when I start up my computer, the spash screen will say "ubuntu studio" and the white rotating throbber will appear, but they're both off-center
[23:02] <Guest92860> I remember they were both center-aligned when I first installed UbuntuStudio, but I can't remember what I did or not to mess them up. Is there a config file I can edit to fix that?
[23:37] <Guest92860> I found out UbuntuStudio is using Plymouth for the bootscreen, I'll keep digging ,but if you know how to reset it to UbuntuStudio's default, please let me know
[23:41] <krytarik> Guest92860: If you messed with it, try reinstalling 'plymouth-theme-ubuntustudio'
[23:45] <Guest92860> will do krytarik, thanks!


[02:39] <micahg> does anyone know why bug counts were removed from the +uploaded-packages and like pages?
[02:42] <lifeless> StevenK: or wgrant: may
[02:48] <wgrant> micahg: Because it was very expensive to calculate, and pretty much unused.
[02:48] <wgrant> We removed it a few months back, and this is the first mention of its absence :)
[02:48] <micahg> I've been meaning to say something for a while now :), it helped me watch for regressions with uploads
[02:49] <micahg> I guess I could probably write something that could warn me even better :)
[02:49] <wgrant> Yeah, but then someone uploads linux and xorg-server and a few drivers, and we end up counting 50000 bugs.
[02:49] <micahg> what if it was opt in?
[02:50] <wgrant> I thought the usual practice was to subscribe to the package for a few weeks
[02:50] <wgrant> Then that would be an opt-in timeout :)
[02:50] <wgrant> So no
[02:50] <micahg> yeah, but subscribe to random packages where I don't want to see most bugs isn't so useful
[02:50] <wgrant> How does the count help you to identify regressions?
[02:51] <wgrant> Unless the package has no bugs open normally at all
[02:51] <micahg> most don't :)
[02:51] <micahg> or the number is very low
[02:55] <micahg> I'm hoping I can access the uploader information both direct and sponsored through the API?
[03:00] <StevenK> Ummmmm. I *think* so
[03:00] <StevenK> It probably ends up on the source publication
[03:01] <wgrant> I don't think it's easily searchable at present, but an API would be fairly easy to add
[03:31] <micahg> ok, well, I'll probably be asking questions at some point
[03:49] <micahg> webops: meissa seems to be having chroot issues lately, does it need a cleaning?
[03:52] <wgrant> I've manualled it
[03:52] <wgrant> It does not seem very happy at all
[03:53] <wgrant> webops: before removing the problematic file from the cache, can you grab its size?
[03:57]  * micahg will retry the chroot failed distro builds
[11:21] <gatox> hi.... i don't know if someone is going to be here today :P but i have a question
[11:21] <czajkowski> gatox: shoot
[11:22] <gatox> czajkowski, awesome! thx..... i have a branch in launchpad that is importing code from git, the git repo had been updated yesterday, but the launchpad branch is not being updated, and now i can't find the "import now" button that it used to be there
[11:22] <gatox> i'm kind of lost..... but i'm kind of rusty with this too
[11:23] <czajkowski> gatox: you importing it to your ppa or a project
[11:23] <czajkowski> looking for the LP urL
[11:24] <gatox> czajkowski, i'm talking about this branch: https://code.launchpad.net/~saruneko/umedia/master
[11:24] <wgrant> gatox: Fixed
[11:24] <gatox> it says import started at.... but is not taking the latest changes from git.....
[11:24] <wgrant> Should reimport in a few minutes
[11:25] <wgrant> There's no "Import Now" button because there's already one scheduled
[11:25] <czajkowski> wgrant: what did you do to fix it
[11:25] <gatox> wgrant, yes..... it reimport several since last night...... but it never take the latest changes from github..... that's the problem
[11:26] <wgrant> It's bug #1072461
[11:26] <wgrant> gatox: Yes, exactly
[11:26] <wgrant> It's updated now
[11:26] <wgrant> Recent revisions
[11:26] <wgrant> 62. By Diego Sarmentero 22 minutes ago
[11:26] <wgrant> update pro
[11:26] <wgrant> czajkowski: I used the workaround that I mention in that bug
[11:26] <wgrant> I changed the URL from https:// to git://
[11:26] <gatox> wgrant, awesome! thx!
[11:28] <czajkowski> ahhhh
[11:28] <czajkowski> cheers
[11:28] <gatox> thx for your help guys!
[13:35] <gotwig> hey
[13:35] <gotwig> whats wrong with that build
[13:35] <gotwig> https://code.launchpad.net/~elementary-os/+recipe/os-patch-ubiquity-precise
[13:35] <gotwig> please help
[13:45] <wgrant> gotwig: It looks like your test suite hangs
[13:45] <wgrant> "Build killed with signal 15 after 150 minutes of inactivity"
[13:45] <wgrant> If there's no stdout/stderr activity for 2.5 hours, a build will be killed
[13:59] <gotwig> wgrant, so just try a rebuild?
[14:13]  * xnox never build ubiquity in a ppa, it's interesting to do it for ubuntu though.
[14:14] <gotwig> it worked before
[14:14] <gotwig> any idea why it does not work
[14:14] <gotwig> why does it *hang*?
[14:14] <gotwig> infinite loop?
[14:54] <hggdh> I have a project on LP that I mistakenly set as private on creation. I have since changed it all to public, and checked the licences to be GPL3. Still, I got an email from LP saying it is a commercial subscription
[14:55] <hggdh> any ideas on what to do?
[14:56] <czajkowski> seeming similar with another project
[14:56] <czajkowski> have just mentioned this to sinzui
[14:57] <czajkowski> hggdh: what is the project ?
[14:58] <hggdh> czajkowski: https://launchpad.net/ue-qa-kernel-tests-infrastructure
[14:58] <sinzui> hggdh, ignore the email. If the project's license is not proprietary the project will continue to stay active. If you are using commercial features, they will be deactivated when the commercial subscription expires
[14:59] <czajkowski> https://launchpad.net/ue-qa-kernel-tests-infrastructure/+sharing
[14:59] <sinzui> hggdh, you may want the commercial subscription if the project needs proprietary blueprints, bugs, or branches.
[15:00] <hggdh> sinzui: no, it does not need it; if it does, anyway, it will be under Canonical (but, again, I see no need)
[15:00] <sinzui> okay
[15:01] <hggdh> czajkowski: I saw the sharing, but worried about deleting it and having my own access vanish
[15:02] <sinzui> hggdh, you access should be through the team. I just removed you
[15:03] <hggdh> sinzui: thank you
[16:39] <gotwig> does no one have an idea?
[16:39] <gotwig> how to fix this build. it runs fine for me, localy
[16:39] <gotwig> after installing some extra dependencies
[16:44] <petsounds> hai. can i get help with launchpad account from this channel?
[16:45] <czajkowski> petsounds: whats up
[16:47] <petsounds> czajkowski: i forgot email address associated with my launchpad account :/
[16:47] <czajkowski> petsounds: didnt we go through this yesterday ?
[16:47] <czajkowski> and you created a new account?
[16:50] <petsounds> czajkowski: this is my first time on #launchpad, and yes i create a new account to check the email address i sign up with but it says "No public address provided"
[16:50] <czajkowski> petsounds: ok what is the LP nick
[16:51] <petsounds> czajkowski: bamf
[16:53] <czajkowski> petsounds: ok so if you don't know your email address you will need to email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[16:59] <petsounds> czajkowski: Ok :D
[17:52] <gotwig> any idea why that went into an infinite loop? https://launchpadlibrarian.net/126190376/buildlog_ubuntu-precise-i386.ubiquity_2.10.20%2Belementary17~precise1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz
[17:53] <TheLordOfTime> broken builder perhaps/
[17:56] <gotwig> TheLordOfTime, so server side?
[17:57] <TheLordOfTime> probably
[23:29] <evillyEvil> How do I fix this error? http://paste.ubuntu.com/1490189/
[23:29] <evillyEvil> I was able to branch from launchpad just yesterday
[23:35] <wgrant> evillyEvil: It sounds like your local SSH keys are misconfigured
[23:35] <evillyEvil> wgrant: No, I don't think taht is possible. Just yesterday, I was able to branch from launchpad
[23:36] <wgrant> What does 'ssh<EMAIL_ADDRESS>say?
[23:39] <evillyEvil> wgrant: it said "permission denied"
[23:40] <wgrant> If you run it with -v, do you see it offering your SSH key?
[23:41] <evillyEvil> Erm, it prints "debug1: Trying .../" ?
[23:41] <wgrant> eg. mine says
[23:41] <wgrant> debug1: Offering RSA public key: /home/wgrant/.ssh/id_rsa
[23:42] <evillyEvil> Then no, I don't see any line with "offering"
[23:42] <evillyEvil> (This is on Windows, btw)
[23:42] <evillyEvil> (And yes, I did run pageant to host the key)
[23:43] <evillyEvil> (is running, that is)
[23:43] <wgrant> Ah
[23:43] <wgrant> Well, there's no problem on the Launchpad end, and I don't know pageant well. But it looks like your client is misconfigured somehow
[23:44] <evillyEvil> Would you suggest re-install bzr?
[23:44] <wgrant> No
[23:45] <evillyEvil> Well, then what should I check?
[23:45] <evillyEvil> I don't understand how I was I able to branch from launchpad just yesterday, and now I can't
[23:45] <evillyEvil> Didn't change anything
[23:45] <evillyEvil> same key, same acocunt
[23:47] <wgrant> evillyEvil: What's your Launchpad username?
[23:48] <evillyEvil> wgrant: I sent you the username
[23:50] <wgrant> 2013-01-02 23:39:30+0000 [SSHService ssh-userauth on KeepAliveSettingSSHServerTransport (TimeoutProtocol)] <yourusername> trying auth none
[23:50] <wgrant> Your client is indeed not sending any keys
[23:50] <evillyEvil> by client, you meant the bazaar application?
[23:51] <wgrant> ssh/pageant, probably.
[23:51] <evillyEvil> Oh, hmmm
[23:51] <evillyEvil> How is that possible? The thing was working yesterday just fine...
[23:52] <wgrant> Windows' SSH client stack is a little non-traditional, so I can't really help there
[23:53] <evillyEvil> wgrant: Ok, I see. But do you have any suggestion on what else I should check?
[23:54] <wgrant> Check that pageant is running, that it has your keys, that ssh is able to connect to it
[23:54] <wgrant> Perhaps the ssh -v output has something useful in it
[23:54] <evillyEvil> wgrant: Well, the output ends with "No more authentication to try ...."
[23:55] <wgrant> Right, but we're interested in what happens *before* it gives up
[23:55] <wgrant> Like, why isn't it trying to use a key
[23:55] <evillyEvil> Also, the debug1 lines contain UNIX-like paths, which look wrong because this is a Windows Environemnt
[23:55] <wgrant> That's probably normal
[23:56] <evillyEvil> http://paste.ubuntu.com/1490235/
[23:56] <evillyEvil> wgrant: That's the output of the command
[23:56] <evillyEvil> I honestly can't find anything helpful there
[23:57] <TheLordOfTime> Permission denied (publickey). <-- did you upload a SSH pubkey to launchpad?
[23:57] <TheLordOfTime> and is the corresponding private key on your system
[23:57] <TheLordOfTime> (and readable by ssh)
[23:57] <wgrant> evillyEvil: It doesn't seem to be trying pageant, but I don't know how ssh/pageant integration works.
[23:58] <wgrant> It's been a very long time since I used it
[23:58] <TheLordOfTime> oop sorry didn't know wgrant was helping
[23:58]  * TheLordOfTime returns to silence
[23:58] <evillyEvil> TheLordOfTime: Yes, I am certain that I have uploaded the public key. Because I was able to branch from launchpad just yesterday.
[23:59] <evillyEvil> wgrant: Yeah, I'm not an expert either!


[16:31] <Nitz> Why are version control software so unintuitive?
[20:51] <Phantomas> does bzr as a project use a shared repository with repository branches or just standalone branches?
[20:53] <Phantomas> what should I use for my project?
[20:55] <jelmer> Phantomas: it's a thing you can decide on a personal basis, there doesn't have to be a project policy on it
[20:56] <jelmer> Phantomas: as a bzr developer, I use shared repositories locally, but bzr itself uses a standalone repository (living at http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bzr-pqm/bzr/bzr.dev, along with the branch)
[20:56] <Phantomas> jelmer: oh, it doesn't make any change if I upload it to launchpad?
[20:56] <jelmer> Phantomas: yep, it doesn't make a difference.
[20:58] <Phantomas> jelmer: ok so to be sure, if I do  bzr init-repo project  and then  bzr init project/trunk  and push it to launchpad it would be the same with bzr init trunk  and push
[20:58] <jelmer> Phantomas: yep
[20:58] <Phantomas> cool :D
[21:00] <Phantomas> jelmer: something else: I read everything about the "Lockstep Development", and understood that it uses checkouts, but has this anything to do with the initialization of the branch?
[21:00] <Phantomas> I mean do I need a different process from bzr init-repo ... bzr init ... ?
[21:02] <Phantomas> jelmer: documentation doesn't mention such a thing... but then how could you be sure that developers use checkouts and the "Lockstep Development" instead of just a normal branch clone?
[21:03] <Phantomas> or this is also a personal choice?
[21:03] <jelmer> Phantomas: checkouts are also just a personal choice, it means all commits you do locally automatically go upstream
[21:03] <Phantomas> Perfect... jelmer thanks a lot... you have been very helpful :)