[10:17] <Cookies> Hello, I'm having trouble with the puppet module. It does set my config correctly, but no run is triggered even though I set 'exec' to 'true'. It sets the config and then continues with the next module which in my case is power_state_change and reboots the server. Does the power_state_change have a higher priority than the puppet exec? Here is my
[10:17] <Cookies> config for reference: https://privatebin.net/?f9c14ac91864ece4#H7y2HF3wkxbKYsMXafjPzyek2PHAqgK1qiCcxR3gSzRV
[11:46] <StyXman> my setup is complicated, so please be patient
[11:47] <StyXman> we have these test systems that use terraform, terraform-lxc, lxc to boot up containers that run centos7 (yes, old, I know) with cloud-init to set the IPv4 via DHCP for one particular interface
[11:47] <StyXman> this stopped working since yesterday, when I upgraded the host (wrong move) from ubuntu 21.04 to 21.10
[11:48] <StyXman> the fact is, it's completely weird because the whole setup is mostly OS independent:
[11:49] <StyXman> lxd is installed via snap, and hasn't ben updated in a year or so, terraform and the provider are also installed by hand in the project's dir and didn't change (altho I tried by upgrading to the provider's 1.6 version) and the OS image didn't change at all
[11:49] <StyXman> so my question is: how can I debug why cloud-init is deciding not to do _anything_ at boot?
[11:50] <StyXman> there's not even a cloudi-init.log file; see https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-init/+bug/1948450
[11:50] <StyXman> I just checked this https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/latest/topics/boot.html#generator and all seems fine
[11:51] <StyXman> https://dpaste.org/n3DD
[11:54] <StyXman> oh
[11:54] <StyXman> [root@demo3-node1 ~]# systemctl status cloud-init-local.service
[11:54] <StyXman> Failed to get D-Bus connection: No such file or directory
[11:54] <StyXman> this is so fsckedup
[14:04] <falcojr> Cookies: I'm assuming puppet is already installed (asking because of the install: false)? What version of cloud-init are you running? Can you also post what's in /var/log/cloud-init? cloud-init doesn't capture the output from the puppet agent, so you're not going to see the agent output in the cloud-init logs.
[14:11] <Cookies> falcojr yes puppet is already installed in the image. The cloud-init version is 20.4.1-2+deb11u1. The log is here: https://privatebin.net/?3d4cf4e196d47d51#98VVo14YPyLcUWHET5rVh9zD2X3a1bCaebpHjHSD124b It not capturing the output of the puppet agent is annoying :/  is there any way to log this for debugging?
[14:18] <falcojr> ahhh, so puppet module got an overhaul in 21.3
[14:18] <falcojr> 20.4 documentation looks like this https://cloudinit.readthedocs.io/en/20.4/topics/modules.html#puppet
[14:19] <falcojr> in 20.4 the service automatically gets set to start on boot and the end of the module triggers a "service puppet start"
[14:20] <falcojr> I don't think there's a way to foreground the run in 20.4
[14:21] <falcojr> Cookies: ^
[14:23] <Cookies> falcojr oh ok, that explains it :D  then I'll have to wait for debian to adapt >=21.3 for bullseye. Will try to find a workaround in the meantime. Thank you very much for your time and helpful information!
[19:28] <asparagus> hi there
[19:29] <asparagus> am trying to configure cloud-config to install puppet agent for ubuntu 20.04.3..does anyone have experience with this?


[04:49] <RiekusR> anyone has multi gestures touchpad with ubuntu mate or is it not possible?
[13:19] <sakrecoer> hi! i'm unsuccesfully looking for the command to disbale alt+right-click to resizee windows in mate.
[13:20] <sakrecoer> comming from XFCE i used to have a little bash script that first disabled the short cut, ran blender and reenabled the shortcut when blender was shutdown...
[13:20] <sakrecoer> but my serachin ahsn't let me find an equivalent command on mate
[13:21] <sakrecoer> gsettings is present, and i found this: gsettings set org.gnome.desktop.wm.preferences resize-with-right-button false
[13:21] <sakrecoer> but it has no effect.


[15:20] <jrwren> greg-g: I really like this that someone put on your FB: https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/words-to-avoid.en.html
[15:20] <jrwren> i don't think I've ever read this list.
[15:22] <rick_h> that's interesting, didn't expect to see "product" on there
[15:22] <Scary_Guy> I like GNU, I hate GNU culture because they're almost too crazy even for me
[15:25] <rick_h> well the things are thoughtful though. I spend a lot of time these days saying "that's not what you said, words have meaning for a reason" so I enjoy this kind of thing
[15:26] <jrwren> i like that they are out there. we need them out there in teh fringe with these crazy ida.
[15:26] <jrwren> ideas
[15:26] <jrwren> rick_h: oh my! you too? "you keep saying that word..."
[15:27] <rick_h> jrwren: :)
[15:27] <rick_h> words are fun and interesting
[15:27] <Scary_Guy> https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTtJEsOFipC7jo-TpalRdSq0egL7-M3wRzPNPW2hOtnqq4_4ic2 (sorry, apparently that server is down)
[15:28] <Scary_Guy> https://trisquel.info/files/lulz23423.png also lol
[15:29] <rick_h> I printed this out as I think it's really cool https://goo.gl/6ks1xH
[15:29] <Scary_Guy> Saw it on reddit, very neat :p
[15:29]  * rick_h needs to write one for "really" as well I guess
[15:30] <jrwren> that is why I use alpine linux.  no-gnu, no-systemd :p
[15:30] <Scary_Guy> I thought alpine had GNU?  weird
[15:35] <Scary_Guy> http://burntsushi.net/stuff/wtfpl-strip.jpg still great
[15:37] <jrwren> i dunno. i muscl gnu?
[15:37] <jrwren> muslc is mit, so I guess no gnu in alpine
[16:02] <cmaloney> TIL: You can order corprolite and a boot about corprolite on Amazon
[16:03] <cmaloney> book
[16:08]  * rick_h looks up what corprolite is
[16:08] <rick_h> ooohhhh
[16:08] <rick_h> what typo led you to discover this?
[16:09] <cmaloney> No typo
[16:09] <cmaloney> We're getting something for my brother-in-law's 40th birthday
[16:09] <cmaloney> aka older than dinosaur poop
[16:10] <cmaloney> ;)
[16:10] <cmaloney> Also every family function that my BiL is at devolves into poop talk so it's appropriate
[16:11] <rick_h> lol
[16:11] <cmaloney> even JoDee's dad's funeral had him talking about how he was mucking out their sump tank
[16:11] <cmaloney> or something... not sure on details
[16:15] <Scary_Guy> I moved around some monitors and switched one for a better one.  Now I'm getting "could not set configuration for CRTC" thrown at me for one of them.  anyone have any ideas?
[16:16] <Scary_Guy> looks like it may be a kernel issue :/
[16:58] <greg-g> jrwren: yeah, I haven't figured out how to respond yet :)
[17:00] <jrwren> greg-g: you dno't have to respond.
[17:00] <greg-g> BUT THERE WAS A LITTLE RED NOTIFICATION THING IN MY UI, AND IT GIVES ME ENDORPHINES
[17:01] <greg-g> I HAVE BEEN GAMIFIED
[17:01] <rick_h> greg-g: succumb to your base instincts!
[17:02] <cmaloney> heh
[17:02] <jrwren> delete the app that is owning you.
[17:02] <cmaloney> https://octodon.social/@craigmaloney/99196346565011265
[17:02] <jrwren> only run things which you own.
[17:02] <cmaloney> This is why I'm deleting my Twitter account
[17:03] <rick_h> greg-g: you still use instagram?
[17:04] <greg-g> rick_h: yeah
[17:04] <rick_h> greg-g: with following tags I've found following #vanlife interesting
[17:04] <cmaloney> You thinking of getting a van?
[17:04] <rick_h> greg-g: thought of you and your camper a little bit as it's more in line with the drive what you brought setup
[17:04] <rick_h> no, I couldn't get a van but I find it inspiring for getting out more
[17:05] <rick_h> I'm slowing pushing my wife to think more seriously about trying to spend extended time in the trailer on the road
[17:05] <greg-g> yeah, I subcribed to /r/vandwellers on reddit :)
[17:05] <rick_h> nice
[17:05] <cmaloney> Couldn't or Erica would have issues with that? :)
[17:06] <cmaloney> Honesdtly I think I could see you both out on the road doing three-week or longer trips
[17:06] <rick_h> greg-g: I follow this mtb'er and hannah has a sweet getaway van setup https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7PrDyOIS97E
[17:06] <rick_h> I can, she can't/won't
[17:06] <cmaloney> yeah
[17:06] <rick_h> she works out of an office while I work from anywhere is the biggest thing. Well that and how to deal with michael/school
[17:06] <cmaloney> homeschool. :)
[17:07] <cmaloney> And she could do freelance doctor visits
[17:07] <rick_h> heh, so I'd never homeschool but we follow some YT folks that do an online school program thing
[17:07] <rick_h> and that is much more interesting
[17:07] <rick_h> well, for the dr thing each state needing a cert is the big issue
[17:07] <cmaloney> right
[17:07] <rick_h> they're working on a tele-medicine setup, but she can only see patience from MI
[17:07] <cmaloney> I'm partially talking out of my posterior
[17:07] <cmaloney> but cool that you're thinking along those lines
[17:08] <rick_h> trust me, I've poked at the problem a bit. the move now is to try to get her to let me just go once in a while. Like a work sprint
[17:08] <rick_h> I was supposed to have a guy's trip with michael this summer but hurt my knee and we had to bail
[17:08] <rick_h> I think that's the warm up to the idea
[17:09] <cmaloney> <3
[17:09] <cmaloney> Yeah, I remember you mentioning that
[17:12] <brousch> I work with a guy who toured the US for a year with his wife in a mobile tinyhouse
[17:13] <rick_h> these folks are really inspiring. He has a day job, they have 3 kids, and still make it work out. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEhJLsShZt8McryMf_DHLZQ
[17:18] <cmaloney> Kind of like minilamism but mixed with traveling.
[17:18] <cmaloney> Pretty neat.
[18:28] <brousch> I do also know someone with 4 kids who have lived from their RV (touring US, Central America) for several years http://homealongtheway.com/
[18:43] <greg-g> ya'll see this? https://www.fcc.gov/ecfs/filing/1051157755251
[18:46] <cmaloney> IT'S COMING FROM INSIDE THE WHITEHOUSE!!!!
[18:52] <jrwren> LMAO
[18:52] <rick_h> greg-g: heh, that's a big one-up from all the dead person comments
[18:53] <rick_h> though tbh, I'd feel better if you could tell who did this.  Now there is slightly more disdain for Rs. That is not to say that I think that Ds are doing any good or helping, but only that Rs are doing even more harm than the Ds.
[19:03] <cmaloney> I find the Rs tend to be more sociopathic rather than corrupt
[19:04] <cmaloney> Ds are corrupt, Rs are sociopaths
[19:04] <cmaloney> Frankly I have yet to find a policital party that I agree with
[19:05] <cmaloney> I find Libertarians siciopathic as well (which is where the Rs are getting a lot of their ideology)
[19:06] <greg-g> the Rs are just better at politics too, see gerrymandering and basically ensuring their continued power no matter the will of the people
[19:07] <cmaloney> greg-g: Yeah...
[20:29] <jrwren> kattni is presenting @mug? I'd come out for that, but I'll be at CES :(
[20:32] <cmaloney> Yeah, she'll be presenting about Circuit Python
[20:32] <cmaloney> CES? Bah.
[20:32] <cmaloney> Nobody cares about CES
[20:32] <jrwren> I agree, but we are launching a product there, so...
[20:32] <cmaloney> "It's a Bluetooth-enabled back-scratcher"
[20:33] <cmaloney> "With an app on your phone that can track how many times you scratch your back, where in your back you scratched, and the total distance"
[20:33] <jrwren> I'll link you to it in a few weeks. :p
[20:33] <cmaloney> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEfQFD0NMJQ
[20:34] <jrwren> actually... i already linked it here, its really just a press splash for that.
[20:35] <cmaloney> Specifically this part: https://youtu.be/oEfQFD0NMJQ?t=2m50s
[20:40] <brousch> cmaloney: Circuit Python eh? I'll try to put together a group to visit or watch the livestream from GR
[20:44] <cmaloney> Awesome
[20:45] <cmaloney> We'll try to make the livestream watchable. :)
[20:59] <jrwren> so close to -funroll-loops https://hannes.hauswedell.net/post/2017/12/09/fmv/
[21:07] <rick_h> jrwren: :)
[21:08] <jrwren>  given this, does it make sense to build your own nodejs, python, or whatever runtime, with compiler optimizations specifically targetting the amd64 CPU arch of your servers?
[21:17] <rick_h> jrwren: you're not?!
[21:18] <jrwren> rick_h: :)


[01:18] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Right now, I have four NEW sources awaiting review: geonkick, dragonfly-reverb, new-session-manager, (all for Ubuntu Studio) and plasma-wallpaper-dynamic (for KDE Plasma). Can we get these reviews expedited? If there are issues, I'd rather fix them sooner rather than be notified when I don't have access due to my relocation.
[01:29] <RAOF> I'm looking at dragonfly-reverb now.
[01:31] <Eickmeyer> Thanks, RAOF . Unfortunately, the concerns you had that we deferred are still going to be there.
[01:36] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: That was the “is the SIL open font license OK with this” question, right?
[01:39] <RAOF> Maybe I'll just look at one of the others first 🙂
[01:47] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: for plasma-wallpaper-dynamic, src/lib /* is under LGPL-3+, not GPL-3+
[01:50] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: ok, can fix.
[01:50] <Eickmeyer> teward: ^
[01:52] <RAOF> It *might* be nice to have a symbols file, but this is C++ so that's purely aspirational. Maybe you should be invoking `dh_makeshlibs` directly and passing it an explicit version?
[01:52] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I don't understand much of that.
[01:53] <RAOF> Eickmeyer: You're shipping a shared library; that means that *something* needs to tell the tools what package dependencies should be generated for things which link to that library.
[01:55] <RAOF> That is `dh_makeshlibs`, which will generate a `.shlibs` file for you (and also get any `.symbols` file processed)
[01:56] <Eickmeyer> Doesn't dh automatically do that or am I mistaken?
[01:57] <RAOF> The `shlibs` file will say something like “libfoo 1 libfoo1 (>= 1.2.3)”, for “libfoo has SOVERSION 1 and the package dependency to add to something which links to that is ‘libfoo (>= ...)’”
[01:58] <RAOF> Yeah, as of debcompat 12 it will add “libfoo (>= $Upstream-Version)”.
[01:58] <Eickmeyer> Ok, I'm using debcompat 13 for this.
[01:59] <RAOF> Yeah, this is not in any way reject worthy.
[02:00] <RAOF> This is just me preferring explicit over implicit in something that's reasonably recently changed debhelper defaults.
[02:01] <Eickmeyer> Ok, I see.
[02:07] <RAOF> Ok, and I don't think the lintian override is justified. `usr/bin/kdynamicwallpaperbuilder` *should* have a manpage, and it's better to have a lintian warning to that effect than to silence the warning.
[02:08] <RAOF> Other than that, it's just the missing LGPL-3+ bit.
[02:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[02:10] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: I already have it fixed. As far as the manpage, I can notify upstream.
[02:11] <Eickmeyer> I've been told that, in the past, if something doesn't have a manpage, to override the warning and justify it in the comment of the override.
[02:11] <RAOF> You're also welcome to write one yourself. I don't mind the lack of a manpage.
[02:12] <Eickmeyer> I can also notify upstream.
[02:12] <RAOF> Hah! Here's where we need to socialise what the actual policy is more, clearly :)
[02:12] <RAOF> Yeah. If there's a manpage upstream that's even better (as everyone gets it).
[02:13] <Eickmeyer> If you look at geonkick you'll notice that it also has no manpage, but upstream has been notified (and as of today has one).
[02:13] <RAOF> (It looks like you could possibly just run `ronn` against `src/tools/builder/README.md` to generate the manpage)
[02:14] <Eickmeyer> Oh, didn't know that.
[02:14] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Reupload coming your way.
[02:15] <RAOF> To be clear, I don't know what that would look like. I was just sure there was a markdown-to-man converter :)
[02:15] <RAOF> I, personally, prefer lintian to generate a missing-manpage warning when there's a binary that's legitimately user-facing and is missing a manpage than for the package to contain a lintian-override to silence that warning, but others may have other ideas.
[02:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic (groovy-proposed/primary) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: ^ There's your new upload.
[02:16] <Eickmeyer> With the copyright issue fixed.
[03:04] <Eickmeyer> RAOF: Did you want to approve that with the d/copyright issue fixed?
[03:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[03:13] <RAOF> Ah, nit that I didn't pick up last time: the MIT license that code uses is more correctly spelt [“Expat”](https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/#license-short-name) (see the note under the table)
[03:13] <RAOF> I'll just file that as a wishlist bug.
[03:14] <Eickmeyer> Sounds good. I can fix that very quickly once it's in the archive as I'm seeding it, so it should get added to my packageset.
[03:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[05:27] <RAOF> xnox: Didn't I reject microcode-initrd last week because (a) debian/copyright claims GPLv3 but the script is GPLv2+ and (b) debian/copyright misses<EMAIL_ADDRESS>from the copyright holders?
[05:28] <RAOF> Why is it back again with the same debian/copyright?
[05:30] <RAOF> Is there something I'm missing here?
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted geonkick [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[07:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: geonkick [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [2.3.6-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:27] <juliank> RAOF: The script now says GPL3 too
[08:27] <juliank> RAOF: And hmh was added
[08:28] <juliank> RAOF: Orig script was GPL-2 or later, but clearly xnox took the "or later" part and licensed the new work as GPL-3
[08:32] <RAOF> Hmm. It's possible that the answer to the question 'am I missing something' could be 'I'm not actually reviewing the current package in the queue'
[08:34] <juliank> :)
[09:52] <xnox> RAOF: i thought I fixed all the things you pointed out, unless i am confused.
[09:53] <xnox> RAOF:  let me download all the things to double check.
[09:54] <RAOF> I'm EOD, but it's entirely possible I was accidentally reviewing a stale copy.
[12:00] <LocutusOfBorg> hello ubuntu-archive, please kick haskell-shake out from release, Debian bug: ##966835.
[12:00] <LocutusOfBorg> Debian bug: #966835
[12:00] <LocutusOfBorg> but it FTBFS now :D
[12:28] <kanashiro> rbasak: re LP #1881196: last time we talked about this postfix SRU you told me to do the verification work and do not worry about the sbuild "regression" (not introduced by postfix). I did that, should I do something else? Or just wait for some SRU team member to take a look at it?
[12:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted muffin [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-1ubuntu0.1]
[12:35] <rbasak> kanashiro: your explanation in the bug is fine. It would be helpful but not required to file an appropriate hinting MP
[12:35] <rbasak> (from https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions)
[12:35] <rbasak> This is the "not a real regression" case I think?
[12:37] <kanashiro> yes, it matches the "not a real regression" scenario
[12:38] <kanashiro> this SRU is laying around for more than a month, I just want to make sure it will land at some point :)
[13:00] <sforshee> ubuntu-archive: I'm still looking for some help resolving the issues blocking linux-signed for groovy
[13:09] <rbasak> coreycb: there are two ceph uploads in the Bionic queue. The latest one looks like it was intended for Groovy? I just wanted to check before rejecting that one.
[13:11] <coreycb> rbasak: yes please reject that, thank you
[13:13] <rbasak> Done, thanks. Looking at the Focal ceph upload first.
[13:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (bionic-proposed) [15.2.3-0ubuntu3]
[13:15] <rbasak> kanashiro: understood. I'm reviewing the upload queues first. I'll spend some time on postfix when I'm done.
[13:22] <rbasak> coreycb: got time to chat about this ceph SRU to Focal to save time round-tripping through the bug?
[13:23] <rbasak> Do you have a link to the upstream commit please? The dep3 header only has the commit hash
[13:23] <rbasak> And I think the addition of debian/control.orig is spurious and should be removed?
[13:25] <rbasak> Also there seems to be no regression potential discussion in the bug?
[13:26] <coreycb> rbasak: are you reviewing bug 1868364 ?
[13:26] <coreycb> sorry you said focal
[13:26] <coreycb> checking
[13:26] <rbasak> No https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1891567
[13:26] <rbasak> Right thanks
[13:28] <coreycb> rbasak: control.orig does appear to be spurious. I'll fix that up and re-upload.
[13:28] <coreycb> rbasak: I will fix up the other things as well and let you know when I'm done. thanks for the review.
[13:29] <rbasak> Thanks!
[13:29] <coreycb> rbasak: ceph is so much fun. I have a riscv64 build going for almost 24 hours now.
[13:29] <rbasak> Is that ceph that is fun, or riscv64? :)
[13:30] <rbasak> I hear kanashiro also enjoys riscv64 :-P
[13:30] <coreycb> maybe both :) arm only takes like 8 hours. it's a 'get it right the first time' kind of package.
[13:31] <kanashiro> you have to have many side tasks while working on riscv64 issues :P
[13:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1001.3] (no packageset)
[13:38] <xnox> apw:  trademarks in package names?
[13:39] <xnox> well, to be fair "linux" is a trademark too
[13:39] <xnox> vmware uses it too, so i guess that's fine.
[13:41] <cjwatson> nominative use surely.
[13:58] <sforshee> sil2100: any chance you could help out with unblocking linux-signed in groovy?
[14:00] <sil2100> sforshee: hey! How can I help?
[14:04] <sforshee> sil2100: we've removed arm64 singed kernels for now because grub issues prevent us from testing them, and update_excuses is complaining about missing arm64 binaries for linux-signed
[14:10] <sforshee> vorlon: I think bug 1889111 should be satisfied by the linux-restricted-modules in groovy-proposed, can you confirm?
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceph [source] (bionic-proposed) [12.2.13-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:18] <sforshee> vorlon: note that linux-restricted-modules is blocked by nvidia-graphics-drivers-450
[14:42] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: Were you going to approve jack-mixer's binaries?
[14:44] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Only two left! dragonfly-reverb and new-session-manager, both are reuploads to fix minor issues vorlon found. As far as NEW binaries, we have geonkick and jack-mixer for Studio (sil2100 was going to take care of that one) and plasma-wallpaper-dynamic for KDE Plasma/Kubuntu. I'd appreciate the help!
[14:49] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: ok, that's embarrasing! I ran lintian on them yesterday to sanity check them and... didn't push the button
[14:49] <sil2100> :(
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted jack-mixer [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [13-0ubuntu1]
[14:50] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: No worries, I thought I caught you before EOD to remind you, but I was wrong. :)
[15:03] <sil2100> sforshee: looking
[15:22] <vorlon> sforshee: if nvidia-graphics-drivers-450 and linux-restricted-modules are now in sync in -proposed, the block-proposed bug should simply be closed
[15:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceph (focal-proposed/main) [15.2.3-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 15.2.3-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[15:27] <sforshee> vorlon: ack, thanks
[15:33] <vorlon> rolling forward postgresql-12
[15:38] <xnox> sil2100: where are 20.04.0 images?
[15:39] <vorlon> mwhudson: cherry-picked your britney2 change
[15:39] <sil2100> xnox: you mean the GA 20.04 images?
[15:40] <vorlon> rolling forward dovecot
[15:40] <vorlon> rolling forward grcompiler
[15:42] <sil2100> xnox: if yes, those are on old-images - and before you ask, yes, you can't get them right now as the syncing of old-releases is broken and waiting for IS
[15:42] <sil2100> ;)
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected telegraf [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1]
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted telegraf [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1]
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: telegraf [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: telegraf [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: telegraf [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (focal-proposed/main) [0.8.3-1ubuntu12.3 => 0.8.3-1ubuntu12.4] (core)
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: telegraf [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected open-iscsi [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu1]
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: telegraf [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.15.1+ds1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:17] <sergiodj> vorlon: thanks
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 6878 entries have been added or removed
[17:15] <coreycb> rbasak: I assume you're EOD but just wanted to let you know ceph is re-uploaded and regression potential section added for the focal SRU
[17:22] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Only two left! dragonfly-reverb and new-session-manager, both are reuploads to fix minor issues vorlon found. As far as NEW binaries, we have geonkick for Studio and plasma-wallpaper-dynamic for KDE Plasma/Kubuntu. I'd appreciate the help!
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: bandage [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.8.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[17:28] <rbasak> coreycb: thanks!
[17:28] <rbasak> I've run out of time today, but I'll try to catch up tomorrow
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-bsipos-thist [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-xorcare-pointer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+git20200211.75cc9bc-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-grafana-grafana-plugin-model [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20190930.1fc953a-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-partitions [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.354.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-crewjam-httperr [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-uniform-notifier [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.13.0-2] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-path-expander [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] <sforshee> sil2100: any progress on linux-signed?
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: commonmark [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.9.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-timberio-go-datemath [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.0+git20200323.74ddef6-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-faraday-middleware-aws-sigv4 [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-unparser [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.7-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-test [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.0+git20200503.328f99a-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rspec-junit-formatter [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-anima [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-2] (no packageset)
[17:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-wait-for-it [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.1-1] (no packageset)
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ceph [source] (focal-proposed) [15.2.3-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[17:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-relational-record [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4] (no packageset)
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted commonmark [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.1-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-timberio-go-datemath [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.0+git20200323.74ddef6-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-anima [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.1-2]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-wait-for-it [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.1-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-hashicorp-terraform-plugin-test [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.0+git20200503.328f99a-1]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-junit-formatter [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-crewjam-httperr [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-xorcare-pointer [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0+git20200211.75cc9bc-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-faraday-middleware-aws-sigv4 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.3.0-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-uniform-notifier [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.13.0-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-grafana-grafana-plugin-model [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0~git20190930.1fc953a-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-path-expander [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-partitions [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.354.0-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-unparser [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.4.7-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted bandage [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.8.1-2]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-bsipos-thist [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [1.0.0-1]
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-relational-record [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-4]
[18:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware (focal-proposed/main) [1.187.2 => 1.187.3] (core, kernel)
[18:49] <sforshee> vorlon: I'm guessing sil2100 might be eod, would you be able to look at the missing binaries problem for linux-signed in groovy-proposed? We intentionally disabled signing for arm64 because grub fails to boot signed arm64 kernels, therefore we cannot test them to verify that lockdown is being enabled under secure boot
[19:09] <LocutusOfBorg> yay new nodejs upload
[19:16] <LocutusOfBorg>  lzop | 1.04-1build1 | groovy           | source, amd64, arm64, armhf, ppc64el, riscv64, s390x
[19:16] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, ^^ i386 please? ffmpeg
[19:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I mean, do_ko did a no change rebuild to bring i386 back, but it isn't there...
[19:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1001.3]
[19:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: hmm we looked at lzop once before, didn't we? why did it go away again
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> who knows... :/
[20:00] <vorlon> ok, I'll investigate
[20:00] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[20:01] <vorlon> sforshee: fwiw you should be able to test with the eoan grub IIRC; and also the groovy grub should be fixed for arm64 soon AIUI (cc: juliank )
[20:03] <mwhudson> vorlon: thanks, that probably ensures we will never see the crash again
[20:03] <vorlon> :()
[20:03] <vorlon> :)
[20:08] <sforshee> vorlon: when I talked to dannf about it he said that no release had a fully functional signed arm64 boot chain, so the best I could hope for was to find some combination of shim/grub from different releases that might work
[20:09] <sforshee> and I didn't go to the effort of trying to figure that all out
[20:12] <vorlon> sforshee: it's correct that no release has a fully functional secureboot chain; shim is now functional in groovy (and needs to be SRUed back to all releases - not sure where we stand with that), I *think* grub worked in eoan at release time so you could cherry-pick the binary for testing and grub will be working soon in groovy so it would be lovely to have a working linux-signed to go with it
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-bullet [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-aws-sdk-core [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [3.104.3-2] (no packageset)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-morpher [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-1] (no packageset)
[20:16] <vorlon> sforshee: why are ppc64el and s390x also showing as dropped?
[20:18] <sforshee> vorlon: they aren't dropped, those binaries do contain the version name so they don't exist in the new build
[20:18] <sforshee> *version in the package name
[20:18] <vorlon> ah, checking
[20:18] <sforshee> I'll try to get a signed arm64 kernel tested for the next upload
[20:20] <sforshee> vorlon: we'll no doubt need a d-i upload too
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-ucm-conf (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-1ubuntu0.1 => 1.2.2-1ubuntu0.2] (no packageset)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-puma-worker-killer [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-1] (no packageset)
[20:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [s390x] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [arm64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [armhf] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-lib (focal-proposed/main) [1.2.2-2.1ubuntu1 => 1.2.2-2.1ubuntu2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (focal-proposed/main) [1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.5 => 1:13.99.1-1ubuntu3.6] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[20:30] <vorlon> sforshee: ok, so making britney completely happy wrt the binary disappearing from arm64 would seem to require me removing the arm64 kernel from groovy release, which of course we don't want to do; so I'll try a force hint here instead
[20:41] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-archive: Only two left! dragonfly-reverb and new-session-manager, both are reuploads to fix minor issues vorlon found. As far as NEW binaries, we have geonkick for Studio and plasma-wallpaper-dynamic for KDE Plasma/Kubuntu. Please accept these soon!!!! :)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: open-iscsi [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/main) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:52] <seb128> Eickmeyer, hey, I know that you are eager to see those reviews finished but please stop repeating the same messages several times a day
[21:02] <Eickmeyer> It's the only way any work gets done.
[21:04] <vorlon> it's really not
[21:05] <Eickmeyer> If that's true, then why did it take me sending that email for them to even get looked at in the first place?
[21:05] <Eickmeyer> After a month of wait?
[21:06] <Eickmeyer> Basically, my time is short. I need these packages reviewed or I'll run out of time to fix issues as they arise.
[21:08] <Eickmeyer> The two source NEW are re-reviews, and of course, get bumped to the back of the line because they were rejected initially. That doesn't seem to be fair. The others are binary NEW and should be a quick click of a button.
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted open-iscsi [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [2.1.1-1ubuntu2]
[21:09] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: my expectation for new-ession-manager was that both the source and binary package names would be changed, not just the binary name.  Do you mind if I fix this up and reupload?
[21:09] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: That's fine.
[21:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected new-session-manager [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1]
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [s390x] (groovy-proposed/none) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plasma-wallpaper-dynamic [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [3.3.3-0ubuntu1]
[22:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linuxaudio-new-session-manager [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:58] <rbasak> People are asking if 18.04 is supposed to prompt for LTS upgrade now that 20.04.1 is out
[22:58] <rbasak> https://www.reddit.com/r/Ubuntu/comments/icv4d4/any_idea_why_so_many_articles_about_20041_release/
[22:59] <rbasak> Am I right in thinking that the switch hasn't been switched yet?
[23:04] <sarnold> rbasak: I'm 90% sure that the 20.04 upgrade will only be offered once focal is removed from https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-development
[23:05] <sarnold> rbasak: I haven't heard why that hasn't happened yet, though
[23:05] <rbasak> Ah
[23:05] <rbasak> And I guessed https://changelogs.ubuntu.com/meta-release-lts, and that doesn't list Focal.
[23:05] <rbasak> Assuming that's the switch, it hasn't been switched :)
[23:06] <rbasak> Thanks!
[23:07] <sarnold> rbasak: hah, I don't think I've seen this one before :)
[23:07] <sarnold> perhaps this release requires two switches to be flipped, as it were..
[23:08] <rbasak> Without looking at the code or someone claiming they know for sure we're both speculating. But my speculation agrees with yours :)
[23:12] <RikMills> the release upgrader in normal mode with LTS only updates selected, checks the meta-release-lts
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-cryptix-wav [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.0~git20180415.8bdace6-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] <RikMills> https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/focal-fossa-20-04-1-lts-point-release-status-tracking/17604
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-morpher [amd64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.2.6-2] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-profunctors [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] <RikMills> "Upgrades from 18.04 to 20.04.1 are still disabled as we are working through a few upgrade blockers"
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-binary-instances [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-contravariant-extras [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] <RikMills> rbasak: see the above discourse link
[23:18] <RikMills> I assume the blocker info is still accurate
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-binary-instances [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-profunctors [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-binary-instances [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-contravariant-extras [arm64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted microcode-initrd [source] (groovy-proposed) [1]
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-contravariant-extras [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: microcode-initrd [amd64] (groovy-proposed/none) [1] (no packageset)
[23:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-profunctors [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-profunctors [s390x] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:42] <rbasak> RikMills: thanks!
[23:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-indexed-profunctors [riscv64] (groovy-proposed/universe) [0.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-binary-instances [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-contravariant-extras [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-indexed-profunctors [riscv64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-contravariant-extras [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-indexed-profunctors [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [0.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-indexed-profunctors [armhf] (groovy-proposed) [0.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-cryptix-wav [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.0~git20180415.8bdace6-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-binary-instances [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-indexed-profunctors [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-morpher [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.6-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-puma-worker-killer [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-binary-instances [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-indexed-profunctors [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [0.1-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-contravariant-extras [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-morpher [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [0.2.6-2]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-aws-sdk-core [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [3.104.3-2]
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-bullet [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [6.1.0-1]
[23:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-contravariant-extras [armhf] (groovy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1] (no packageset)