[00:12] <jbicha> could an AA please kill rabbitcs-thunar (from src:rabbitvcs)? rabbitvcs was recently reintroduced to focal and now it doesn't want to migrate because I dropped a binary pkg
[00:12] <jbicha> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rabbitvcs/0.18-1ubuntu1
[00:30] <stgraber> quick nag for a release team member to look into https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1867535
[00:31] <stgraber> we're now ready to upload it as we've had 100000+ users on it for a few days and have tracked down and fixed what seems like the one regression that didn't get discovered in our testing (attach to a nested container that's using LXC 2.0.x, admittedly a bit of a edge case, but we're testing for this daily now)
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gftp (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.19-5ubuntu1 => 2.0.19-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-games-app (focal-proposed/universe) [3.35.92-0build1 => 3.36.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gftp [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.19-6]
[00:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-games-app [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1]
[00:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lintian (focal-proposed/main) [2.59.0 => 2.61.0] (core, i386-whitelist) (sync)
[02:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wireguard-linux-compat (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.20200318-1ubuntu1 => 1.0.20200330-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wireguard-linux-compat [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.20200330-1ubuntu1]
[03:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: carla (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1~rc1-0ubuntu2 => 2.1~rc2-0ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntustudio)
[03:57] <Eickmeyer> ^ Laney, there's my upload.
[04:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcpanel-json-xs-perl (focal-release/main) [4.19-1build1 => 4.19-1build1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[04:35] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: please do not use lintian overrides to override lintian messages that are /correct/.  The purpose of lintian overrides is to enable suppression of messages in cases where lintian is not capable of determining whether a package has a bug
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted carla [source] (focal-proposed) [2.1~rc2-0ubuntu1]
[04:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted eyed3 [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8.10-1.1]
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: retro-gtk (focal-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-1 => 0.18.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted retro-gtk [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.18.1-1]
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: muffin (focal-proposed/universe) [4.4.2-3 => 4.4.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed php7.3 from i386-whitelist in focal
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed recode from i386-whitelist in focal
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added breathe to i386-whitelist in focal
[04:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted muffin [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.4.3-1]
[04:51] <vorlon> stgraber: ffe granted; and also, is the auto-accept bot running? I see some things in unapproved that I don't think should be there
[04:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: pepper (focal-proposed/primary) [0.3.3-4]
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libcpanel-json-xs-perl [sync] (focal-release) [4.19-1build1]
[05:50] <vorlon> jbicha: what's the purpose of this lintian sync given that 2.59.0 is stuck in -proposed due to armhf autopkgtest regressions and nothing in the upstream delta appears to address this:?
[06:40] <didrocks> can we get ubiquity and zfs-linux unblocked please? There are fixes for zfs installation and it will be difficult to have an upgrade path for people doing current installation with old parameters
[07:13] <didrocks> sil2100: hey, when you get time, mind having a look? ^
[07:28] <sil2100> didrocks: hey! What's up? (no backlog!)
[07:44] <didrocks> sil2100: can we get ubiquity and zfs-linux unblocked please? There are fixes for zfs installation and it will be difficult to have an upgrade path for people doing current installation with old parameters
[08:07] <Laney> sil2100: seems like having the same block twice breaks it
[08:07] <sil2100> didrocks: looking
[08:08] <sil2100> Ok, I think it makes sense to have that migrate
[08:09] <Laney> eww, libreoffice didn't even finish building yet
[08:09] <sil2100> I'll unblock carla for studio as well
[08:10] <apw> Laney, sil2100, there is a new kernel in -proposed which is security related which would be nice to have in the beta
[08:10] <didrocks> sil2100: thanks!
[08:10] <RikMills> the libreoffice amd64 build last weekend took (took 1 day, 8 hours) o_O
[08:11] <RikMills> and err.... morning :)
[08:14] <sil2100> apw: ah, gues that's the kernel that surprised me mid-night yesterday!
[08:14] <sil2100> *guess
[08:14] <Laney> good timing apw ;-)
[08:14] <apw> sil2100, supprise to everyone i hope
[08:14] <apw> Laney, i think i missed getting d-i in before the block by a few minutes :)
[08:15] <sil2100> Laney: guess we should unblock it too, right?
[08:15] <Laney> yeah, apw can probably handle that one
[08:15] <sil2100> And then wait for things to migrate...
[08:16]  * apw can ask for the unblock sure
[08:16] <Laney> you can push the unblock :p
[08:17] <apw> sorry that is what i meant, i can ask britney for that; its never a given with her
[08:17] <Laney> ha
[08:17] <apw> Laney, add it to freeze ?  so its doecumented?
[08:18] <apw> Laney, or just u-r as normal, matters little i gues
[08:18] <Laney> apw: ubuntu-release
[08:18] <Laney> the 'freeze' hint is mainly so that excuses says 'blocked by freeze'
[08:19] <apw> which is cute ish
[08:22] <Laney> ah p-m runs aren't looking too hot again
[08:23] <sil2100> Did I break it with some hint again?
[08:23] <Laney> no, something networkish this time
[08:24] <sil2100> Ah, yeah, I see the logs
[08:24] <sil2100> Weird, maybe that's just a transient networking thing
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unattended-upgrades (focal-proposed/main) [2.0 => 2.1] (core) (sync)
[08:26] <apw> i assume as things are freeze blocked we are free to review away on the queue
[08:33] <rbalint> apw, yes, please review it, it has a critical fix
[08:35] <juliank> Updated edos-distcheck output: https://people.canonical.com/~jak/distcheck.yml
[08:36]  * apw reviews unattended-upgrades
[08:36] <juliank> we're down to 245 packages in the release package that have uninstallable build depends
[08:36] <juliank> I included the date of the release file now at the end of the file
[08:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unattended-upgrades [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1]
[08:49] <seb128> could someone review the FFe on bug #1868019 ?
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-abstract-type [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.7-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-binding-ninja [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2.3-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-configurable [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-core [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.4.9-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-adamantium [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-container [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.7.2-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-concord [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.1.5-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-logic [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.5-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pepper [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.3.3-4]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-inflector [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-knapsack [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.18.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-pry-rails [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.3.9-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-profiling [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.0.5-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-set [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ruby-parser [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.11.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-test-prof [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.10.2+dfsg-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-equalizer [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.3.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-lru-redux [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-puppet [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.8-3]
[08:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-spring-commands-rspec [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ruby-dry-logic [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.5-2]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rubocop-performance [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.6.2-2]
[08:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-tty-command [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[08:52] <rbalint> ubuntu-archive please unblock kodi: LP: #1868499
[08:56] <sil2100> seb128: on it!
[08:56] <sil2100> rbalint: will try to get to that
[08:56] <seb128> sil2100, thanks!
[08:58] <RikMills> can anyone review LP: #1864994
[08:58] <jibel> sil2100, beta candidate is 20200330 or you plan to build a new one soon?
[08:59] <Laney> We will build new ones soon
[08:59] <RikMills> has been in new since end of Feb
[08:59] <Laney> RikMills: New source packages don't need feature freeze exceptions.
[09:00] <Laney> or is it uploaded?
[09:00] <RikMills> Laney: It is uploaded, Just needs new source review
[09:00] <Laney> it is, I seeeeee
[09:00] <apw> Laney, i can look at that now, just comeing out from under the security release
[09:01] <sil2100> jibel: as Laney said, these are not candidate images yet
[09:01] <RikMills> thanks!
[09:06]  * Laney crosses fingers for a successful p-m run
[09:07] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Hi, Can I sync kylin-nm <IP_ADDRESS>-1 from Debian which contains a bugfix that cant't switch  from wireless to wired? Without it, the desktop may failed to connect the network.
[09:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[09:09] <Laney> handsome_feng: Yes
[09:09]  * Laney tries to stop poor Łukasz getting pinged for every single thing
[09:09] <sil2100> handsome_feng: +1
[09:10] <sil2100> Laney: ;) As long as you're keeping your eyes on the channel, it's all good! I don't mind being pinged, just worried that maybe others that could act earlier won't notice the request
[09:10] <handsome_feng> Thanks!
[09:11] <RikMills> apw: thank you :)
[09:12] <apw> we so need to change the AA highlight; there are too many urls with that in
[09:14] <sil2100> seb128: ok, almost approved, just asked a few questions on the FFe bug
[09:14] <seb128> sil2100, thanks, let me look
[09:15] <seb128> is https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html known to not be refreshing?
[09:15] <apw> and there is a case in point
[09:15] <Laney> lol
[09:16] <apw> there is a reason i voted for aa-help
[09:16] <Laney> yes seb128, some network problems, should be visible on the proposed-migration logs
[09:16] <Laney> hopefully working now
[09:16] <sil2100> apw: I was considering changing my highlight to "ubuntu-archive:", but then I was worried I'll miss some pings with people mentioning the highlight in a sentence
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-nm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[09:17] <apw> sil2100, all the other ones i have are -help :)
[09:17] <wgrant> ([^~]|^)ubuntu-archive maybe
[09:17] <wgrant> or something like that
[09:17] <seb128> Laney, thanks, I didn't know we had log published for that, I found them now, learnt a new thing :)
[09:18] <Laney> great!
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kylin-nm [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1]
[09:21] <sil2100> wgrant: good idea! I guess irssi probably supports regex for hilights, will read up on that ;)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cmark (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.29.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cmark [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.29.0-2]
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4-1ubuntu2 => 5.5-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[09:23] <Laney> oho
[09:23] <Laney> I suppose we probably need to handle i386-whitelist in the bot
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plymouth (focal-proposed/main) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu3 => 0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu5] (core)
[09:24] <seb128> ^ could that plymouth upload be consider for beta?
[09:24] <seb128> it add fsck support to plymouth, which was flagged as a rc issue
[09:24] <Laney> yup
[09:25] <seb128> thanks
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bitlbee (focal-proposed/universe) [3.6-1.1build1 => 3.6-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:25] <seb128> I've included a boot improvement issue from upstream after giving it a proper round of testing since I think it's worth having, and better before beta so we get more feedback
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bitlbee [source] (focal-proposed) [3.6-1.1ubuntu1]
[09:27]  * Laney hands seb128 a number book though
[09:27] <Laney> 3 -> 5!
[09:28] <apw> wgrant, trying that as a buffer specific highlight_regex now
[09:28] <seb128> Laney, shrug, I wish dch was smart enough when you use -i again on an UNRELEASED already bumped version to just do nothing :p
[09:29] <seb128> Laney, I tend to "dch -i <something>", not the first time I screw by doing that for a second patch :/
[09:29] <Laney> seb128: ah, I never use -i, just rely on it opening a new version when needed
[09:31] <Laney> seb128: this fsck patch, what's the relationship with the casper changes from yesterday?
[09:33] <seb128> Laney, there is an old ubuntu specific protocol and an upstream documented one from fsckd
[09:33] <seb128> Laney, the casper upload changed to use the upstream documented one
[09:34] <seb128> Laney, the plymouth patch handle both the legacy and fsckd messages
[09:34] <seb128> so not really a direct relation between the uploads
[09:34] <Laney> and we need to handle the old ones for some reason?
[09:35] <seb128> it's what mountall & co were speaking, I don't know if it's still relevant
[09:35] <seb128> Daniel felt better still supporting the legacy one for this cycle
[09:39] <Laney> k
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted plymouth [source] (focal-proposed) [0.9.4git20200323-0ubuntu5]
[09:42] <Laney> seb128: if you want to repay the favour, getting that oem package in NEW reviewed (for main) would be nice for me ;-)
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: catch (focal-proposed/universe) [1.12.1-1 => 1.12.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted catch [source] (focal-proposed) [1.12.1-1ubuntu1]
[09:46] <seb128> Laney, k
[09:46] <seb128> Laney, thanks for plymouth!
[09:47] <seb128> sil2100, I replied to your comment on the gnome-control-center bug
[09:47] <sil2100> seb128: excellent!
[09:48] <sil2100> seb128: ok, this is what I wanted to know - mostly if the fractional scaling feature has been tested on Ubuntu by more users already
[09:48] <sil2100> Which seems to be the case
[09:49] <apw> wgrant, that works well as a buffer specific highlight_regex
[09:50] <wgrant> apw: Oh, nice, I'll try it myself then...
[09:50] <sil2100> seb128: approved - do you want to upload it now?
[09:50] <apw> wgrant, the only problem is they are not persistnat so you need a plugin to make them so
[09:50] <wgrant> Oh :(
[09:51] <apw> there is one by flashcode, so i am using that buffer_autoset
[09:51] <sil2100> Seeing that we seem to be waiting for a few other things already, do you want to try uploading it now - with the possibility of it being in Beta still?
[09:51] <sil2100> seb128: ^
[09:53] <handsome_feng> Hi, sil2100, could you ack  this LP: #1869007?  :)
[09:53] <sil2100> handsome_feng: can't promise to ACK it, but I will review it! :)
[09:54] <sil2100> (looking at it now!)
[09:54] <handsome_feng> Thanks! ❤
[09:54] <Laney> RikMills just said he was looking at that
[09:54] <Laney> sil2100:
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-adamantium [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-inflector [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-core [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.4.9-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rspec-puppet [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.8-3] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kpeoplevcard [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pepper [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-4] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-binding-ninja [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-binding-ninja [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-pry-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.9-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rubocop-performance [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.2-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-test-prof [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.2+dfsg-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] <RikMills> Laney sil2100 not actually started yet, so I will defer if you like
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kpeoplevcard [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-binding-ninja [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rspec-profiling [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.5-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-tty-command [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-abstract-type [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.7-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-ruby-parser [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.11.0-2] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-equalizer [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-2] (no packageset)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pepper [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.3.3-4]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-lru-redux [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2] (no packageset)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-spring-commands-rspec [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-binding-ninja [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rspec-set [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:56] <Laney> It really doesn't need to be the release team reviewing new packages for sponsoring
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-abstract-type [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0.7-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-binding-ninja [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2.3-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-binding-ninja [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.2.3-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-equalizer [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.3.0-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-lru-redux [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-profiling [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0.5-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-set [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.1.3-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-ruby-parser [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.11.0-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-test-prof [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.10.2+dfsg-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-adamantium [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-core [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.4.9-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-pry-rails [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.3.9-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rubocop-performance [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.2-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-tty-command [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-binding-ninja [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.2.3-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-rspec-puppet [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.7.8-3]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-inflector [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-2]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-spring-commands-rspec [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[09:57] <seb128> sil2100, will do, thanks
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-control-center (focal-proposed/main) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.36.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop)
[10:00] <seb128> sil2100, ^
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ispell-lt (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-8 => 1.2.1-8ubuntu1] (edubuntu, ubuntugnome)
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cwiid (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.00+svn201-4build1 => 0.6.00+svn201-5] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[10:01] <seb128> are daily builds stopped/happening later than usual?
[10:01] <apw> wgrant, oh there is a regexp which is global too, trying that
[10:01] <Laney> Stopped
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ispell-lt [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.1-8ubuntu1]
[10:03] <seb128> :-(
[10:04] <Laney> That always happens during a milestone
[10:04] <Laney> There will be candidates later on
[10:04] <seb128> yeah, I was just waiting on an issue to test the status of plymouth/see if adding the label plugin fixed the checksum messages not displaying at all
[10:04] <seb128> on an *ISO*
[10:05] <seb128> been waiting since sunday, it took over a day for plymouth to migrate and it missed the build yesterday
[10:06] <seb128> or well, I will test on the first beta candidate I guess
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/primary) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[10:14] <RikMills> sil2100: ^
[10:14] <sil2100> Laney, handsome_feng: ah, yes, it's a NEW package so please upload it to the NEW queue
[10:15] <sil2100> I can then do a NEW review on it
[10:15] <RikMills> sil2100: in NEW now
[10:15] <sil2100> \o/
[10:15] <Laney> \o\
[10:16]  * sil2100 reviewing g-c-c
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-openstacksdk (focal-proposed/main) [0.45.0-0ubuntu1 => 0.45.0-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[10:17] <jamespage> hi -release - I'm finishing off a couple of updates to openstack related packages - ^^ unblocks an issue with testing in builders that is causing FTBFS
[10:17] <jamespage> which will be followed by senlin and octavia uploads
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (focal-proposed) [1:3.36.1-1ubuntu2]
[10:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: senlin (focal-proposed/universe) [9.0.0~b2~git2020020610.5f955f23-0ubuntu1 => 9.0.0~b3~git2020032615.d3bd9ef3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:18] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Thanks a lot! I will try to find a sponsor to upload it now!
[10:18] <RikMills> handsome_feng: I just uploaded
[10:18] <sil2100> handsome_feng: RikMills just sponsored i/
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted senlin [source] (focal-proposed) [9.0.0~b3~git2020032615.d3bd9ef3-0ubuntu1]
[10:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ceres-solver (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.0-4build1 => 1.14.0-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:19] <handsome_feng> RikMills: oh, thankssssssss!
[10:19] <RikMills> handsome_feng: tried it on your ISO. Looks nice!
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceres-solver [source] (focal-proposed) [1.14.0-4ubuntu1]
[10:21] <jamespage> I still have a weird test failure for octavia so debugging that now
[10:25] <handsome_feng> RikMills: Thanks, we will keep improving it! there are still some bugfix in debian, I will sync them after beta freeze :)
[10:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spdylay (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.2-2.1build4 => 1.3.2-2.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spdylay [source] (focal-proposed) [1.3.2-2.1ubuntu1]
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kpeoplevcard [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kpeoplevcard [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kpeoplevcard [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-knapsack [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-reference (focal-proposed/universe) [2.76 => 2.76ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-reference [source] (focal-proposed) [2.76ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: discover-data (focal-proposed/universe) [2.2013.01.11 => 2.2013.01.11ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [arm64] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-knapsack [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.18.0-2]
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kpeoplevcard [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [0.1-0ubuntu1]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted discover-data [source] (focal-proposed) [2.2013.01.11ubuntu1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: chrony (focal-proposed/main) [3.5-6ubuntu1 => 3.5-6ubuntu2] (core)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: displaycal (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: djorm-ext-pgarray (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2-0ubuntu3 => 1.2-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-server)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dms (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dms [source] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu2]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-binding-ninja [armhf] (focal-proposed) [0.2.3-2]
[10:58] <locutus_> hello vorlon, is it possible to do the magic? missing build on i386: actionaz (from 3.10.0-1ubuntu3)
[10:58] <locutus_> from src:actiona
[10:59] <locutus_> also, libsass migration is one hint on i386 away! autopkgtest for libsass/3.6.3-1: amd64: Pass, arm64: Pass, armhf: Pass, i386: Regression ♻ , ppc64el: Pass, s390x: Pass
[11:00] <locutus_> I don't think we can recover that failure
[11:00] <sil2100> Laney: hey! I had a moment just now and started looking at oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta
[11:01] <sil2100> Laney: it looks good, I also read the OEM MIR exception page - just had one question, did all this get finally approved/discussed by the TB?
[11:03] <xnox> there is TB mailing list thread, but they have not commented on it lately
[11:03] <Laney> sil2100: thanks, the TB stuff is still pending, so we may have to revise things later on
[11:03] <xnox> last time they spoke it was during TB meeting in 2019
[11:04] <xnox> yeah
[11:04] <xnox> i think they wanted to see all pieces fall together to review it
[11:04] <juliank> To follow up on the distcheck from yesterday, I now have a cron job on my server temporarily to do those, and they publish three files
[11:04] <juliank> https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/focal.yml - checks that sources packages in release pocket have b-d satisfiable in release pocket
[11:05] <juliank> https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/focal-proposed.yml - checks that sources packages in release+proposed pocket have b-d satisfiable in release+proposed pocket
[11:05] <juliank> https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/focal-proposed-against-release.yml - checks that sources packages in release+proposed pocket have b-d satisfiable in release pocket
[11:05] <sil2100> Laney, xnox: thanks guys
[11:06] <juliank> They'll move to somewhere more official at some point, forgive me, I did not want to spend much time on it now
[11:06] <juliank> here's the script: https://magenta.jak-linux.org/ubuntu-archive/distcheck/update.sh
[11:06] <juliank> the cron job is @hourly bash <path to that script>
[11:07] <sil2100> Laney: I guess I'm fine with the versioning, but just wanted to make sure it's intentional: the package is versioned 20.04~ubuntu1, while I guess I'd just expect 20.04.1 or 20.04 or 20.04ubuntu1
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-logic [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:07] <sil2100> I think this is mostly cosmetic, but yeah
[11:07] <Laney> sil2100: It's because of the interactions with the OEM archive
[11:08] <wgrant> Hm, so we expect the OEM archive to replace the package that the primary archive uses to chain to it?
[11:08] <wgrant> That makes rotation etc. harder
[11:08] <wgrant> I'd prefer the primary archive control the delegation package...
[11:08] <xnox> wgrant:  no it doesn't.
[11:09] <xnox> wgrant:  we have strict version requirements, and archive always has control to rotate things off.
[11:10] <xnox> wgrant:  plus we must avoid the requirement to upload meta-packages into the archive to "release" a new hotfix. as all hotfixes are prepared in private and usually have disclosure timelines that are oem driven. Thus updates are staged in the vendor-accessible archive; then released to the public oem archive which has meta-package update + e.g. one more new dep on a newly fixed foo package.
[11:10] <xnox> wgrant:  see the spec doc for metapackage versions.
[11:10] <wgrant> OK, fair enough.
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4-1ubuntu2 => 5.5-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:23] <sil2100> Laney: ah, one small thing for the oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta package - guess we might need to suppress the lintian warning of package-installs-apt-sources
[11:23] <cpaelzer> hi release team - for bug 1867036 there is a chrony upload in focal-unapproved
[11:23] <sil2100> cpaelzer: on it
[11:23] <Laney> sil2100: That's probably a good idea for the template
[11:23] <cpaelzer> IMHO that qualifies for "please only upload updates for packages on any release images if you /need/ to get them into the beta itself."
[11:23] <Laney> would it be ok to file a bug?
[11:24] <cpaelzer> let me know if you think otherwise on the chrony casesil2100
[11:24] <Laney> cpaelzer: sounds legit :-)
[11:25] <Laney> sil2100: I filed https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/oem-qemu-meta/+bug/1869867
[11:26] <sil2100> Laney: excellent, thanks!
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted chrony [source] (focal-proposed) [3.5-6ubuntu2]
[11:26] <Laney> asking FourDollar_s to take a look
[11:28] <sil2100> I'll accept it as is right now
[11:31] <Laney> ♥
[11:33] <cpaelzer> thank you sil2100
[11:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[11:44] <sil2100> Guess once things build we might want to do another round of unblocks before the candidates
[11:46] <Laney> We might want to do some skips
[11:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-configurable [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.6.2-2] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-concord [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.5-2] (no packageset)
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-concord [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.1.5-2]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-logic [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.5-2]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-configurable [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[11:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-puppetlabs-spec-helper [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.6.2-2]
[11:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4-0ubuntu2 => 1.4-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[11:52] <RikMills> hi, I would like that ^ in kubuntu image unless it is inconvenient now
[11:53]  * sil2100 looks
[11:54] <sil2100> I think it's still good, at least I'll accept it into -proposed
[11:55]  * sil2100 off to prep lunch
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeconnect [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4-0ubuntu3]
[11:55] <RikMills> thanks. I want that in the final release, so figure better to be on the beta iso to test
[11:58] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Hi, will qt5-ukui-platformtheme get into beta? If so, I will upload a new version of ukui-desktop-environment which depends on it.
[12:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: octavia (focal-proposed/universe) [6.0.0~b2~git2020020614.005cd1e6-0ubuntu2 => 6.0.0~b3~git2020032609.73fca169-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted octavia [source] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0~b3~git2020032609.73fca169-0ubuntu1]
[12:20] <bdmurray> jibel: It looks like there is something wrong with automatic upgrade testing as it hasn't happened in 12 days or so
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-ugorji-go-codec (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-1 => 1.1.7-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-mate)
[12:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-docs (focal-proposed/main) [19.10.2 => 20.04.1] (desktop-core, personal-gunnarhj)
[12:21] <jibel> bdmurray, let me check
[12:23] <jibel> bdmurray, unblocked. The jenkins executors were down.
[12:23] <bdmurray> jibel: thanks!
[12:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: folder-color (focal-proposed/universe) [0.0.86-0ubuntu2 => 0.0.86-0ubuntu3] (ubuntu-mate)
[12:27] <rbalint> ubuntu-release please unblock unattended-upgrades 2.1, it can migrate to the release pocket
[12:29] <Laney> handsome_feng: get it uploaded
[12:29] <Laney> rbalint: ok
[12:29] <oibaf> Hi, can someone sync this package, please? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pikepdf/+bug/1867504
[12:29] <Laney> oibaf: can you try #ubuntu-motu or #ubuntu-devel please?
[12:30] <oibaf> Laney: ok, thanks for the tip
[12:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04~ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pikepdf (focal-proposed/universe) [1.10.0+dfsg-1build1 => 1.10.3+dfsg-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-desktop-environment (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1 => 2.0.2] (ubuntukylin)
[12:39] <handsome_feng> Laney: Uploaded, :)
[12:41] <jibel> any ETA for beta images?
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ignition-cmake (focal-proposed/universe) [0.6.1-1 => 0.6.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ignition-cmake [source] (focal-proposed) [0.6.1-1ubuntu1]
[12:44] <RikMills> oibaf: synced, but in unnaproved queue as it seems it is on studio dvd
[12:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ignition-math4 (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+dfsg1-5build1 => 4.0.0+dfsg1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ignition-math4 [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0+dfsg1-5ubuntu1]
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-container [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-2] (no packageset)
[12:54] <sil2100> handsome_feng: I'm still reviewing it
[12:54] <sil2100> (was on lunch ;) )
[12:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ignition-transport (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.0+dfsg-4build2 => 4.0.0+dfsg-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-container [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.7.2-2]
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ignition-transport [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0+dfsg-4ubuntu1]
[12:56] <handsome_feng> take your time, :)
[12:58] <rbalint> sil2100, could you please revisit https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/381267 ?
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: indicator-printers (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.7+17.10.20171101-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.7+17.10.20171101-0ubuntu2] (edubuntu)
[13:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-printers [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.7+17.10.20171101-0ubuntu2]
[13:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ipython-genutils (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1build1 => 0.2.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ipython-genutils [source] (focal-proposed) [0.2.0-1ubuntu1]
[13:09] <bdmurray> Laney: In the "Welcome to Ubuntu" stuff on the last page "Ready to go" clicking on 'Open "software" now' isn't doing anything. Do you know if that is known?
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: java-gnome (focal-proposed/universe) [4.1.3-8 => 4.1.3-8ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[13:12] <LocutusOfBorg> RikMills, next time your sync, please use "-s oibaf" and maybe -b 1867504
[13:13] <LocutusOfBorg> so it gets listed on his contributions page, helping him in becoming MOTU :D
[13:13] <RikMills> LocutusOfBorg: I did the -b, but forgot the -s
[13:13] <RikMills> thx
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libhugetlbfs (focal-proposed/universe) [2.21-0ubuntu1 => 2.22-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libhugetlbfs [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[13:18] <sil2100> handsome_feng: hey! I see that the debian/watch file is basically empty, where are the upstream tarballs fetched from?
[13:19] <sil2100> handsome_feng: it's from here, right? https://github.com/ukui/qt5-ukui-platformtheme/releases
[13:22] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Yes
[13:23] <sil2100> handsome_feng: could you add a github-aware debian/watch file then? With that the package looks fine and I can accept it :)
[13:23] <handsome_feng> I will do it now
[13:23] <oibaf> thanks for syncing pikepdf, I didn't understand if it will be included in final focal
[13:24] <sil2100> handsome_feng: I can sponsor and accept, just give me a sign once you have it :)
[13:24] <sil2100> Thank you!
[13:24] <seb128> bdmurray, sounds like bug #1869591
[13:25] <bdmurray> seb128: Yeah, I found it. There is an error in journalctl but its truncated...
[13:25] <sil2100> bdmurray: hey! Do you have the cycles/motivation to do some wiki-ish editing tasks for the release?
[13:25] <bdmurray> Got it, updating the bug
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libosmocore (focal-proposed/universe) [0.12.1-3 => 0.12.1-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:26] <seb128> bdmurray, I will test but I'm waiting for an iso to be available to start testing installs
[13:26] <bdmurray> seb128: It says "gnome-software: not found"
[13:26] <seb128> haha
[13:26] <bdmurray> sil2100: sure
[13:26] <seb128> kenvandine, ^
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libosmocore [source] (focal-proposed) [0.12.1-3ubuntu1]
[13:27] <seb128> bdmurray, kenvandine, in fact I can fix that, need to call snap-store...
[13:27] <kenvandine> seb128: indeed
[13:27] <sil2100> bdmurray: I sent an e-mail thread to ubuntu-docs last week regarding content-ideas for https://help.ubuntu.com/community/FocalUpgrades , could you take a look at the feedback and incorporate it into that page?
[13:28] <kenvandine> seb128: thx
[13:28] <bdmurray> sil2100: sure
[13:29] <sil2100> bdmurray: thanks o/
[13:30] <LocutusOfBorg> oibaf, I guess it will
[13:30] <oibaf> LocutusOfBorg: thanks!
[13:31] <Laney> come on libreoffice
[13:31] <Laney> you can build
[13:32] <juliank> don't forget the unicorn sacrifice before the beta
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpgm (focal-proposed/universe) [5.2.122~dfsg-3 => 5.2.122~dfsg-3ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[13:32] <gaughen> juliank, you said unicorn!
[13:32] <juliank> haha
[13:32] <gaughen> juliank, don't sacrifice unicorns!
[13:32]  * gaughen is watching
[13:33] <juliank> :)
[13:33] <gaughen> :-)
[13:34] <cwayne> gaughen: idk I think we have some to spare https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/IZkEFy9m/IMG_20200314_103057.jpg
[13:35] <gaughen> cwayne, that's from milking unicorns!
[13:35] <cwayne> thanks, i hate it
[13:36] <juliank> I'd sue that over false advertisement
[13:36] <juliank> "made with star dust"
[13:37] <rbasak> I'm sure it is made with star dust.
[13:37] <rbasak> Not much matter on Earth isn't!
[13:38] <RikMills> ^true
[13:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpyzy (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-6build1 => 1.0.1-6ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[13:41] <sil2100> cwayne: it has unicorn tattoos in it! Holy cow
[13:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I would say holy unicorns instead!
[13:42] <cwayne> rbasak: look at Neil degrasse Tyson over here :)
[13:43] <rbasak> :)
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted oem-somerville-three-eyed-raven-meta [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04~ubuntu1]
[13:48] <stgraber> vorlon: not sure if you or someone else took care of auto-accept, but I see it running on snakefruit and the log shows it accepted stuff
[13:48] <Laney> I started it last night
[13:48] <Laney> and said when I did so
[13:48] <Laney> 30/03 21:41:00 <Laney> auto-accept bot is ON!
[13:48] <Laney> that's GMT+1
[13:49] <sil2100> Laney has teh powers
[13:49] <Laney> what's the issue?
[13:50] <stgraber> Laney: vorlon asking about 4h later what's up with it as he didn't see auto-accepts that he would have expected
[13:50] <stgraber> that's why I went looking at logs
[13:51] <sil2100> Oh, reviewing ubuntu-docs from the queue too
[13:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-docs [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.1]
[13:56] <Laney> sil2100: opinions on force-skiptest libreoffice?
[13:57] <sil2100> Laney: as it is just a dependency change, I think we can skiptest it
[13:58] <Laney> bit scary, but probably the best option :/
[13:58] <Laney> sorry if it breaks $orld
[13:59] <Laney> pushed
[13:59] <sil2100> handsome_feng: how's the watch file going? ;)
[14:03] <handsome_feng> sil2100: I have upload it to the ppa: https://launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/+archive/ubuntu/qt5-ukui/+packages, and it's still in building.
[14:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librdkafka (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-1build1 => 1.2.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:04] <sil2100> handsome_feng: it's just the watch file that's updated, right? In that case I'll download the source, check if the watch file works, sponsor and approve ;)
[14:04] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Yes, I just added a watch file.
[14:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librdkafka [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.1-1ubuntu1]
[14:04] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: You'd notice from the linked page in the comments of the lintian override that the lintian override I made regarding the Windows portable executable that there is no way to make it "secure" with current tools. I got that information straight from the tag itself.
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhugetlbfs [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.22-1] (no packageset)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhugetlbfs [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.22-1] (no packageset)
[14:05] <Eickmeyer> So, I did what I am supposed to do when the error is incorrect and overrode it.
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pycparser (focal-proposed/main) [2.19-1build1 => 2.19-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhugetlbfs [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.22-1] (no packageset)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhugetlbfs [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.22-1] (no packageset)
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhugetlbfs [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [2.22-1] (no packageset)
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librtcom-telepathy-glib (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu4 => 0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librtcom-telepathy-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [0.1.38~git.1.e4dae27b-0ubuntu5]
[14:09] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ok, so the watch file was still missing one small change: the url inside needs to be //github.com/ukui/qt5-ukui-platformtheme/releases
[14:09] <sil2100> I mean, https://github.com/ukui/qt5-ukui-platformtheme/releases
[14:09] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Sorry, I just notice that
[14:10] <sil2100> handsome_feng: one question though: I downloaded 1.0.0 from releases and it has a different md5sum than the .orig tarball used for 1.0.0 in the package
[14:10] <handsome_feng> will fix it right now and run uscan locally
[14:11] <handsome_feng> emmm, I revert to the tag v1.0.0, maybe something changed, then I will use the source from the formal PPA
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-dry-types [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.2-2] (no packageset)
[14:12] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ah, hm, so it seems the upstream tarball for releases has the debian/ directory included
[14:13] <sil2100> handsome_feng: that seems to be the only difference
[14:13] <sil2100> handsome_feng: I guess I'd recommend removing debian/ from the tarballs that you are releasing in github :)
[14:14] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Ok, I will do that later,  and if you mind I upload the newly version in github to the formal PPA and then you can check the changes?
[14:15] <handsome_feng> s/formal/former/
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhugetlbfs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhugetlbfs [armhf] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhugetlbfs [s390x] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhugetlbfs [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-dry-types [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.2-2]
[14:17] <seb128> sil2100, Laney, can you skip autopkgtest to get plymouth migrating as well? systemd/s390x failed and it's waiting on arm64/ppc64el which I don't think are going to be relevant to the changes in that upload
[14:17] <sil2100> handsome_feng: yes, we can do that :)
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libhugetlbfs [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [2.22-1]
[14:17] <Laney> seb128: Let's see, we are still waiting for libreoffice to even build
[14:17] <Laney> I don't want to get into the habit of that
[14:17] <Laney> s390x will be badtested though
[14:18] <seb128> k
[14:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mediaelement (focal-proposed/universe) [2.15.1+dfsg-1 => 2.15.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mediaelement [source] (focal-proposed) [2.15.1+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[14:23] <Laney> actually arm64 finished so I expect this to go in on the next round
[14:25] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Uploaded the new version to the PPA: https://launchpad.net/~feng-kylin/+archive/ubuntu/ukui-debian and the diff: https://launchpadlibrarian.net/471956127/qt5-ukui-platformtheme_1.0.0-0ubuntu1_1.0.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: help2man (focal-proposed/universe) [1.47.12 => 1.47.13] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: madness (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.1~gite4aa500e-10.1build1 => 0.10.1~gite4aa500e-11] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted madness [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.10.1~gite4aa500e-11]
[14:28] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ok, just remember to release the exact same tarball into github as 1.0.1
[14:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-commander (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.1-2 => 4.0.1+really2.20.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-commander [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.0.1+really2.20.0-2]
[14:31] <handsome_feng> sil2100:  I  will, we leave the debian/ in master branch is because we just focus on the development on Debian/Ubuntu and it is easy to manage the project, :)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-colored2 (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1.2-1 => 3.1.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-dalli (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.9-1 => 2.7.9-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:32] <sil2100> handsome_feng: sure, that's absolutely fine ;) It's just important that people get the same orig tarball when downloading from github and Ubuntu, otherwise they might be worried that someone tinkered with the packages!
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-colored2 [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.1.2-2]
[14:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-dalli [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.7.9-2]
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-delayer-deferred (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.1-2 => 2.1.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:33] <handsome_feng> sil2100: Got it , will solve this problem
[14:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-delayer-deferred [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.1-3]
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-diva (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[14:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-diva [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-2]
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (bionic-proposed/main) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 2:11.0.5-4ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-server)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: open-vm-tools (eoan-proposed/main) [2:11.0.1-2ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 2:11.0.5-4ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/primary) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[14:39] <sil2100> handsome_feng: ^
[14:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-desktop-environment [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.2]
[14:39] <sil2100> (just be sure to push that 1.0.1 to github!)
[14:43] <handsome_feng> sil2100: I will and thanks a lot!
[14:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-grape [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.1+git20200320.c8fd21b-2] (no packageset)
[14:59] <sil2100> Laney: oh, is it possible that libreoffice amd64 is finishing to build? I see the logs showing the build summary!
[15:00] <Laney> indeeEEEEEEEEEEd
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (focal-proposed/main) [2.655 => 2.656] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-factory-girl-rails (focal-proposed/universe) [4.7.0-1 => 4.7.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-factory-girl-rails [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.7.0-2]
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> Finished 2 minutes ago (took 23 hours, 59 minutes, 12.0 seconds)
[15:07] <LocutusOfBorg> damn, for just 48 seconds
[15:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nagios-plugins-contrib (focal-proposed/universe) [25.20191015+1 => 25.20191015+1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios-plugins-contrib [source] (focal-proposed) [25.20191015+1ubuntu1]
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (focal-proposed/universe) [5.4-1ubuntu2 => 5.5-1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt5-ukui-platformtheme [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt5-ukui-platformtheme [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt5-ukui-platformtheme [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt5-ukui-platformtheme [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt5-ukui-platformtheme [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nifticlib (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-3 => 2.0.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nifticlib [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0-3ubuntu1]
[15:20] <Laney> question is can it publish before the next proposed-migration run starts
[15:20] <Laney> I'm guessing NOPE
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: offlineimap (focal-proposed/universe) [7.2.3+dfsg1-1build1 => 7.2.3+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted offlineimap [source] (focal-proposed) [7.2.3+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openconnect (focal-proposed/universe) [8.02-1.1 => 8.05-1] (kubuntu) (sync)
[15:22] <RikMills> sil2100: kdeconnect tests running now, so hopefully that will be ready to migrate in next+1 britney run
[15:36] <bdmurray> I forget is there some way to test the geolocate stuff in bug 1277189?
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (focal-proposed/main) [3.36.0-1ubuntu3 => 3.36.0-1ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntugnome)
[15:43] <Laney> bdmurray: I think it ends up hitting https://geoip.ubuntu.com/lookup
[15:44] <bdmurray> Laney: haah, it ends up using my VPN IP
[15:45] <Laney> same here, sad
[15:46] <Laney> well I guess that's giving us some P
[15:46] <Laney> ... s/te/cy/ ...
[15:47] <bdmurray> Any idea where we should report that?
[15:47] <seb128> could the ^ gnome-initial-setup upload be considered?
[15:48] <Laney> what do you want to happen?
[15:48] <seb128> it fixes the initial setup software screen not working because it was still trying to call gnome-software
[15:48] <bdmurray> Not have that traffic get tunneled?
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openfst (focal-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-2build1 => 1.6.3-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openfst [source] (focal-proposed) [1.6.3-2ubuntu1]
[15:49] <Laney> Then I guess Canonical RT, but that's a questionable request and I hope IS push back on you :-)
[15:50] <Laney> seb128: will do
[15:50] <Laney> this is really super close to the wire
[15:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-initial-setup [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu4]
[15:53] <seb128> Laney, thanks
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openttd-openmsx (focal-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-5 => 0.3.1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openttd-openmsx [source] (focal-proposed) [0.3.1-5ubuntu1]
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-htree (focal-proposed/universe) [0.8+dfsg-3 => 0.8+dfsg-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-htree [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.8+dfsg-4]
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-instance-storage (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-3 => 1.0.0-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[15:59] <RikMills> please unblock kdeconnect/1.4-0ubuntu3
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-instance-storage [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-4]
[15:59] <sil2100> RikMills: ACK
[15:59] <RikMills> thx :)
[16:01] <xnox> bdmurray:  Laney: you can add custom route to <IP_ADDRESS> on your machine to use non-vpn device
[16:02] <sil2100> RikMills: ah, it's already unblocked!
[16:02] <RikMills> sil2100: ooh. must have missed that. apologies!
[16:02]  * RikMills looks at emails
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:03] <xnox> bdmurray:  i kind of wish we had a fake geoip.ubuntu.com inside our DC such that US vpn clients get US boston; UK vpn clients get UK london; etc. and such that our datacentres servers work correctly too.
[16:03] <RikMills> ah L@aney was kind enough to do it with the libreoffice unblock :)
[16:06] <Laney> xnox: directory backend to geoip for VPN addresses
[16:06] <Laney> :)
[16:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pax-utils (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.4-1 => 1.2.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:07] <xnox> hahahhahaha
[16:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pax-utils [source] (focal-proposed) [1.2.5-1ubuntu1]
[16:08] <xnox> Laney:  it should just return isle of man all the time, that will make people for sure know that they are connected to the vpn
[16:08] <Eickmeyer> vorlon, sil2100: Thanks for your emails. I'll respond to them soon, but, as you could probably see from my email, yesterday kindof stressed me out. I'm going to take today off for the most part.
[16:10] <xnox> Eickmeyer:  in many ways we do beta milestone to dry run all of our processes that will be there for the final GA. so yes, it is a bit stressful, but the ship has now sailed yet and we can still fix everything up for the GA later in april! do rest, everything will be alright.
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-multipart-parser (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.1-2 => 0.1.1-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-necromancer (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1 => 0.5.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-multipart-parser [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.1.1-4]
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-necromancer [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.1-2]
[16:15] <Odd_Bloke> I've never had these problems by (a) knowing where I am, and (b) using `dpkg-reconfigure tzdata`. ;)
[16:16] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  we are testing installer ISOs to ensure they do support the feature of picking the right country mirror out of the box.
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phantomjs (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.1+dfsg-2build1 => 2.1.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-budgie, ubuntukylin)
[16:17] <xnox> Odd_Bloke:  however, i hate canary islands => their mobile providers push continental spanish network time, which is wrong timezone!
[16:18] <vorlon> Laney: I had to manually accept eyed3 which I don't see as being seeded anywhere, and there was another I saw in the queue last night that looked like it should've been auto-accepted
[16:19] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: actionaz/i386 removed
[16:19] <Laney> vorlon: OK, well you can run auto-accept with --debug if you see such a situation again to figure out what it thinks the reason is
[16:19] <vorlon> Laney: ack
[16:22] <Odd_Bloke> xnox: =)
[16:30] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: yw! Remember: feel free to poke me or anyone else from the release team if you have any concerns or worries regarding the release, we're certainly figure something out
[16:36]  * sil2100 waits for things to settle
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.656]
[16:37]  * RikMills waits for britney
[16:37] <RikMills> 'one more time!'
[16:37] <RikMills> lol
[16:38]  * ginggs hits RikMills
[16:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpsl (focal-proposed/main) [0.21.0-1 => 0.21.0-1ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:48] <RikMills> ouch
[16:48] <RikMills> ok. different pop culture ref then 'run britney run!'
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (xenial-proposed/main) [2.42.1 => 2.44.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (focal-proposed/main) [2.44+20.04 => 2.44.1+20.04] (core)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (bionic-proposed/main) [2.42.1+18.04 => 2.44.1+18.04] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (disco-proposed/main) [2.42.1+19.04 => 2.44.1+19.04] (core)
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpam-krb5 (focal-proposed/main) [4.8-2 => 4.8-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: snapd (eoan-proposed/main) [2.42.1+19.10 => 2.44.1+19.10] (core)
[16:57] <sil2100> ;)
[17:00] <Laney> this is THE run right
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-ole (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-ole [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[17:05] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks vorlon ! and for libsass permanent hint please?
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1081.91] (no packageset)
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1081.91]
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-pastel (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.3-1 => 0.7.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-pastel [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.7.3-2]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-power-assert (focal-proposed/main) [1.1.5-1 => 1.1.7-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-tty-cursor (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.1-1 => 0.7.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-tty-cursor [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.7.1-2]
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-tty-spinner (focal-proposed/universe) [0.9.3-1 => 0.9.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-tty-spinner [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.9.3-2]
[17:35] <sil2100> Laney: I see chrony tests are failing, but I guess we won't block on getting that migrated?
[17:37] <Laney> sil2100: I don't think so
[17:37] <Laney> Can do another round if it's necessary for the image
[17:37] <Laney> cpaelzer: ^-
[17:38] <Laney> going out for my daily permitted exercise now, bbl
[17:41]  * RikMills thanks britney for the 'apparently successful' list :)
[17:42]  * RikMills thanks release-team as well ;)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-twitter-text (focal-proposed/universe) [1.14.7+conformance-1 => 1.14.7+conformance-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[17:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-twitter-text [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.14.7+conformance-2]
[18:05] <sil2100> Ok, I think we're starting to look ready
[18:06] <sil2100> I'll clean up rebuild requests on nusakan in the meantime
[18:23]  * sil2100 runs anonftpsync
[18:30] <sil2100> Laney: tell me once you're back o/ I think we should be good to go, but I'd like to double-confirm with you before I press the button
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pickleshare (focal-proposed/universe) [0.7.5-1build1 => 0.7.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pickleshare [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.5-1ubuntu1]
[18:46] <locutus_> doko, ruby-grape accept from new please? it should make ruby-defaults migrate
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: playonlinux (focal-proposed/multiverse) [4.3.4-1build1 => 4.3.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-typed-array (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-6 => 0.1.2-7] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted playonlinux [source] (focal-proposed) [4.3.4-1ubuntu1]
[18:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-typed-array [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.1.2-7]
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-zoom (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1.1build1 => 0.5.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-zoom [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.0-2]
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pseudo (focal-proposed/universe) [1.9.0+git20190515+996bead-2 => 1.9.0+git20190515+996bead-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pseudo [source] (focal-proposed) [1.9.0+git20190515+996bead-2ubuntu1]
[18:55] <sil2100> Ok, I think we're really good now, I guess I'll just start spinning the candidates
[18:55] <sil2100> We can always re-spin later today if anything didn't get in
[18:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ruby-grape [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.1+git20200320.c8fd21b-2]
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysycache (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1-3.3build1 => 3.1-3.3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysycache [source] (focal-proposed) [3.1-3.3ubuntu1]
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-backports-abc (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5-2build1 => 0.5-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-backports-abc [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5-2ubuntu1]
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-5build1 => 1.0.0-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-backports-shutil-get-terminal-size [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-5ubuntu1]
[19:19] <Laney> sil2100: here, sorry for delay but it was nice so I went farrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
[19:21] <sil2100> I'm waiting for teh final anonftpsync to finish and I press the buttons if you don't have anything against it
[19:21] <sil2100> (it's taking quite a while)
[19:21] <Laney> what's the benefit of running that manually?
[19:21]  * Laney hasn't done that other than when it gets stuck
[19:22] <Laney> don't see anything critical caught by the freeze block so feel free to do it
[19:23] <sil2100> Laney: I run that always before kicking builds since the time of one point-release when because of that we had to re-spin the isos ;)
[19:25] <Laney> heh
[19:25] <Laney> might be good to make cdimage fail harder in that case then :p
[19:26] <sil2100> Ok, all images building - since I remembered ubuntu-base not working in the past via iso-tracker, I'm building those directly on nusakan
[19:29] <Laney> ok, going to cook, see some people tomorrow in the "office" o/
[19:30] <sil2100> Laney: bon appetit!
[19:30] <seb128> Laney, enjoy!
[19:55] <sil2100> Crap, the raspi images failed to build
[19:56] <sil2100> Ah, wait
[19:56] <sil2100> I think those were ment to fail, duh, the isotracker kicked off raspi3 images instead of raspi ones
[19:57] <sil2100> I think I need to correct that
[19:57] <sil2100> On it now ^
[20:02] <kanashiro> ubuntu-archive: could someone take a look at this RM request? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-em-hiredis/+bug/1869434
[20:08] <vorlon> locutus_: AFAICS libsass should be testable if sassc-spec* were updated to Depend on ruby:any instead of on ruby and if libsass's debian/tests/control were updated to depend on ruby:native.  But I can't currently test here, because sass-spec-data contains non-normalized UTF8 filenames, which causes the package to fail to unpack on ZFS. :P
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpsl [source] (focal-proposed) [0.21.0-1ubuntu1]
[20:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-grape-logging [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.8.3-1] (no packageset)
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:15] <sil2100> Ok, building the raspi images now
[20:15] <sil2100> (properly)
[20:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:11.0.5-4ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:16] <bdmurray> sil2100: I noticed the raspi image test cases aren't showing for Focal.
[20:19] <sil2100> bdmurray: what do you mean?
[20:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted open-vm-tools [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:11.0.5-4ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:20] <bdmurray> sil2100: http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/384/builds
[20:20] <bdmurray> "Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi3" is missing when you look at Focal Beta builds
[20:20] <sil2100> bdmurray: yes, that is expected, related to what I wrote above ^
[20:21] <sil2100> bdmurray: once the 'proper' raspi builds finish "Ubuntu Server arm*+raspi" products should appear! Since we renamed raspi3 to raspi
[20:21] <sil2100> (if those builds won't fail to build)
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: psycopg2 (focal-proposed/main) [2.8.4-1ubuntu4 => 2.8.4-2] (ubuntu-server) (sync)
[20:21] <bdmurray> sil2100: got it I didn't realize their appearance was dependent on the build
[20:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted psycopg2 [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.8.4-2]
[20:22] <sil2100> bdmurray: yeah, so the isotracker, for new milestones, only shows the new builds it picks up - we can manually add builds by hand, but usually it's just best to wait for builds to finish and get picked up by the isotracker
[20:23] <sil2100> And since now raspi3 is raspi, I had to create a new product that fits the name
[20:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1047.52] (no packageset)
[20:28] <sil2100> bdmurray: sadly not much going on today besides waiting and waiting
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1047.52]
[20:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.1.9-0ubuntu1.3]
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: php7.4 (focal-proposed/main) [7.4.3-4build2 => 7.4.3-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted alsa-lib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3-5ubuntu0.5]
[20:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:42] <mclemenceau> here they come :)
[20:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[20:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted containerd [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.3.3-0ubuntu1~19.10.2]
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.56-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted evolution [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.5-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:58] <sil2100> \o/
[21:00] <sil2100> It all feels a bit slower than usual tho
[21:00] <Laney> That happens when there's a test rebuild ongoing :(
[21:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: intel-vaapi-driver-shaders (focal-proposed/multiverse) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1build1] (i386-whitelist)
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted intel-vaapi-driver-shaders [source] (focal-proposed) [2.4.0-1build1]
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added intel-vaapi-driver-shaders to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added xfce4-dev-tools to i386-whitelist in focal
[21:37] <sil2100> vorlon, Laney: I'm a bit worried about the desktop builds, e.g. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu/+build/209750
[21:37] <sil2100> Estimated finish: 1 hour ago
[21:38] <sil2100> Guess it still might be caused by the archive rebuilds, but I just hope it won't trip and die
[21:42] <RikMills> sil2100: normal builds have been doing similar on and off since the full archive rebuilds started. they finish in the end. I guess it is LP networking maxed out transferring the results of builds
[21:43] <vorlon> sil2100: I'm unclear why the archive rebuild would cause individual livefs builds to run that much more slowly
[21:43] <vorlon> network saturation on uploading the result would make sense
[21:43] <vorlon> but should that be "currently building" in such a case
[21:43] <vorlon> anyway, should we flag wgrant
[22:09] <Laney> Everything runs slower when the cloud is being hammered, that's why I said that.
[22:09] <Laney> but I didn't poll the bulid log to see if the output is actually changing
[22:17] <Laney> They're all at scan-for-processes, what's that about
[22:26] <Laney> I'm off but if this goes on for too much longer I would agree it's probably worth getting someone to check that the builds are doing something actually useful
[22:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[22:32] <Laney> Ah, that's a good sign
[22:35] <wgrant> vorlon, Laney: do you have specific examples of affected builds? Is it a general problem across all architectures?
[22:36] <wgrant> The transfer from the builder to alphecca happens during "Currently building". It's the upload to the librarian etc. that is during "Uploading build".
[22:36] <Laney> wgrant: Most of the livefs builds that are in progress now
[22:37] <Laney> e.g. https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/focal/ubuntu/+build/209750
[22:37] <Laney> It's at the very end of the build so it does seem plausible to me that it's transferring stuff
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal Beta] (20200331.1) has been added
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal Beta] (20200331.1) has been added
[22:37] <Laney> And the fact that builds are indeed completing... I guess we're probably just hitting contention quite hard
[22:39] <Laney> If we could output there that we're uploading stuff, that would be a bit reassuring I think
[22:42] <sil2100> Maybe it'll just finish sooner or later, but I'm worried that the desktop ones are taking so long
[22:42] <Laney> xubuntu just finished
[22:44] <Laney> They're going to get there I think, but this is kind of concerning like if we wanted to do respins
[22:44] <Laney> anyway, catch you tomorrow
[22:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[23:00] <sil2100> Laney: see you o/
[23:12] <jbicha> vorlon: no reason on the lintian sync
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-1017.18] (core, kernel)
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] (kernel)
[23:15] <sil2100> Ok, I think I can't wait for desktop to appear
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] (kernel)
[23:17] <sil2100> uh, was scared for a minute since I got an ubuntukylin build failure, but it's for bionic - phew
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (bionic-proposed/main) [3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.1 => 3.0.3-0ubuntu1~18.04.2] (edubuntu, ubuntu-server)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal Beta] has been updated (20200331)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (eoan-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-2 => 3.0.4-2ubuntu1] (edubuntu)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-46.38~18.04.1] (kernel)
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (bionic-proposed/main) [3.9-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 3.9-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[23:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sosreport (eoan-proposed/main) [3.9-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 3.9-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[23:55] <sil2100> Ok, I see that the amd64 desktop image finished 30 minutes ago, but the arm one is still going
[23:55] <sil2100> But I suppose it should appear sooner or later
[23:55] <sil2100> bdmurray: ^
[23:55] <sil2100> I go now
[23:55] <sil2100> Goodnight


[00:26] <lazyPower> I just noticed that it became possible to remove a subordinate relation *hattip* ty for that gents
[00:44] <rick_h_> lazyPower: coolio
[00:45] <lazyPower> rick_h_: i'm probably lagging behind in the features landing in gui. Hows things on your side o the fence?
[00:46] <rick_h_> lazyPower: going well, antonio pointed out a giant bug today but docs now update and http://juju.ubuntu.com/ is a cool new place now :)
[00:46] <lazyPower> rick_h_: intredasting. are you aware that the /docs still links to the old docs?
[00:47] <lazyPower> (it auto completed.... maybe i'm being picky)
[00:47] <lazyPower> but i dig that its all redirecting to jujucharms.com now, thats groovy baybeh
[00:55] <rick_h_> lazyPower: the docs should be redirected as well
[00:55] <lazyPower> might be caching on my side
[00:55] <rick_h_> so have to bring that up I guess
[00:55] <lazyPower> i seem to find all those fun "you had something cached" issues
[00:56] <rick_h_> naw, it's just they just did it today so missed something there
[00:58] <rick_h_> rt replied to
[00:58] <rick_h_> so hopefully fixed up tomorrow
[12:19] <dimitern> hey guys
[12:20] <dimitern> someone familiar with quickstart can perhaps tell me were there any changes needed after the fix for bug 1420403 landed in juju-core (1.21, 1.22, and trunk)
[12:20] <mup> Bug #1420403: juju-quickstart: bad API server response: 'NoneType' object is not iterable <api> <ci> <network> <regression> <juju-core:Fix Released by frankban>
[12:20] <mup> <juju-core 1.21:Fix Released by frankban> <juju-core 1.22:Fix Committed by frankban> <juju-quickstart:Invalid by frankban> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1420403>
[12:21] <frankban> dimitern: no, no changes required on the client side
[12:22] <dimitern> frankban, that's what I remember as well - is quickstart using lp:python-jujuclient internally?
[12:22] <frankban> dimitern: it is
[12:23] <dimitern> frankban, and the client also didn't need to change right?
[12:28] <dimitern> frankban, I doesn't seem like jujuclient changed since before the fix - just looking at the code
[12:28] <frankban> dimitern: correct
[12:29] <dimitern> frankban, thanks!
[12:29] <frankban> dimitern: was the fix released?
[12:29] <dimitern> frankban, well, 1.21.3 is released, which includes the fix, but jamespage today reported this bug 1425435
[12:29] <mup> Bug #1425435: juju-deployer/jujuclient incompatibility with 1.21.3 <api> <network> <regression> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1425435>
[12:31] <frankban> dimitern: I still get "Ports":null with 1.22-beta3
[12:32] <dimitern> frankban, that's expected - 1.22-beta3 was released before the fix
[12:33] <dimitern> frankban, hmm.. actually according to the changelog it should have the fix
[12:34] <dimitern> frankban, something's wrong here.. I'll investigate more
[12:37] <dimitern> frankban, ah, I see the problem - 1.22-beta3 includes my original fix for bug 1418433 which you then improved as part of fixing bug 1420403
[12:37] <mup> Bug #1418433: unit ports not populated by API megawatcher <api> <regression> <juju-core:Fix Released by dimitern> <juju-core 1.21:Fix Released by dimitern> <juju-core 1.22:Fix Released by dimitern> <juju-gui:Invalid> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1418433>
[12:37] <mup> Bug #1420403: juju-quickstart: bad API server response: 'NoneType' object is not iterable <api> <ci> <network> <regression> <juju-core:Fix Released by frankban>
[12:37] <mup> <juju-core 1.21:Fix Released by frankban> <juju-core 1.22:Fix Committed by frankban> <juju-quickstart:Invalid by frankban> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1420403>
[12:40] <frankban> dimitern: so we don't have a release with the subsequent fix?
[12:44] <dimitern> frankban, 1.21.3 should have both, but apparently there's still a problem
[12:44] <dimitern> frankban, can you do a quick test with 1.21.1 from the stable juju ppa?
[12:48] <dimitern> frankban, sorry, I meant 1.21.3, not 1.21.1
[12:48] <dimitern> (the latest available)
[13:06] <frankban> dimitern: doing it now
[13:29] <frankban> dimitern: it works with 1.21.3-utopic-amd64 from the stable PPA
[13:30] <dimitern> frankban, great! thanks for confirming
[13:30] <frankban> dimitern: so new release landed in stable but not in devel?
[13:31] <dimitern> frankban, that's one possibility, another one that's bugging me is the issue might be still there if you upgrade from 1.21.1 to 1.21.3 - I'm testing this now
[13:32] <frankban> dimitern: it wasn't working on my local machine with a fresh environment using the latest devel version, so I presume devel does not have the fix
[13:33] <dimitern> frankban, oh, that's weird, but easier to check - cheers, I'll look into the devel ppa
[13:34] <frankban> dimitern: ty
[14:07] <jcastro> hey rick_h_
[14:07] <jcastro> have we talked about CIing all the bundles on that page on a regular basis?
[14:07] <jcastro> we as in us collectively, not you you. :)
[14:10] <rick_h_> jcastro: it's brought up. There's the bundletester stuff and charm testing is supposed to look at bundles once the charm stuff is good, but I've no idea where that's at to be honest
[14:10] <jcastro> yeah also we have another problem
[14:11] <jcastro> bundles and all that jazz will work fine in AWS/Azure, etc.
[14:11] <jcastro> then you go onsite with an OB and boom
[14:11] <rick_h_> boom because?
[14:12] <jcastro> whatever issue is local that we can't reproduce in a cloud, for example this weekend we had a squid problem on an OB
[14:12] <jcastro> and it didn't matter if the bundle worked or not, the entire thing needed to be hand held
[14:12] <jcastro> I guess I am just saying that just testing bundles in the public cloud isn't good enough
[14:13] <rick_h_> jcastro: ok, good to know. We can look into doing some OB testing on things. I know they've set some up over a company vpn and maybe we can get some time to figure out what's up and correct it if it's a regular isue.
[14:14] <rick_h_> hatch: ping when you're in, frankban brought up a good point on the promulgated bundles and that the id there is just the bundle name.
[14:38] <hatch> rick_h_: that's not a problem though is it?
[14:38] <hatch> and good morning :)
[14:38] <rick_h_> hatch: no, not a problem just wanted you to make sure you kept that in mind during dev/qa
[14:38] <rick_h_> hatch: as we only talked about u/xxxxx/name urls yesterday
[14:39] <hatch> yeah, this is what I came up with https://gist.github.com/hatched/3613d21af62ca9c221ed
[14:39] <hatch> I think that it'll work for all different formats
[14:40] <rick_h_> hatch: cool will QA that then. I'll work to bring up a storefront/gui together and test out the 'add to demo' and the commands across a bunch of bundles once we're ready
[14:41] <hatch> sounds good - I'm just writing the GUI tests right now for this then I'll be hopping on the storefront
[14:41] <rick_h_> ty
[15:54] <hatch> rick_h_: the GUI PR is up https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/697
[17:38] <hatch> uiteam could I get a review on https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/697 thx
[17:38] <rick_h_> hatch: looking
[17:38] <hatch> thanks
[17:38] <rick_h_> two cancelled calls in a row ftw! :)
[17:39] <hatch> haha less walking though
[17:49] <frankban> dimitern: any news on the Ports problem?
[17:53] <dimitern> frankban, not really - I've investigated thoroughly, couldn't reproduce it and reported my comments in bug 1425435
[17:53] <mup> Bug #1425435: juju-deployer/jujuclient incompatibility with 1.21.3 <api> <network> <oil> <regression> <juju-core:Triaged> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1425435>
[18:07] <frankban> dimitern: ack, ty
[18:52] <hatch> great talk lazyPower
[18:53] <lazyPower> Thanks hatch :)
[18:54] <hatch> lazyPower: do you find people understand the ansible charms better than bash ones?
[18:54] <hatch> I would have assumed a bash/python charm would be easier to grok
[18:57] <lazyPower> hatch: Ansible is really well documented and gives you a lot of batteries out of the box in terms of idempotency, and logic structures
[18:57] <hatch> is it the 'popular' one now? vs chef and whatnot
[18:57] <lazyPower> i'm trying to campaign to get ppl using proper config management rather than spawning these behemoth toolbox libraries (like we have in charmhelpers) where cm tools have already solved this problem.
[18:58] <lazyPower> eh, its a bit of preference, yaml is easier to learn than ruby + DSL's for chef/puppet - but puppet is still hands down the 800lb gorilla in the room
[19:00] <hatch> ahh
[21:25] <lazyPower> hatch: do you know if rick_h_ is still around?
[21:26] <hatch> lazyPower: your guess is as good as mine :)
[21:27] <hatch> if he is I'm sure he'll poke his head in now that you have dinged
[21:27] <lazyPower> ok, just curious if he had an emergency to run out for
[21:27] <lazyPower> well i feel bad now, i've dinged him in 3 places :(
[21:27] <lazyPower> my name is going to be synonymous with a curse word before long...
[21:27] <hatch> lol
[21:27] <lazyPower> man.. chuck that.
[21:27] <hatch> nah you have a long way to go yet
[21:27] <lazyPower> thats the chuckest thing i've heard all day
[21:29] <hatch> Makyo: you able to do a qa on my PR?
[21:30] <Makyo> hatch, sure, I'm spinning my wheels as it is
[21:30] <hatch> break time! :)
[21:31] <Makyo> Got the PR number off the top of your head?
[21:32] <hatch> https://github.com/juju/juju-gui/pull/697
[21:32] <hatch> one better :)
[21:32] <Makyo> Thanks
[21:38] <Makyo> hatch, LGTM (though maybe in the future, we want the "Location:" link in the header might need to be update din the future)
[21:38] <hatch> Makyo: yeah tbh I have no idea what the purpose of that is anymore
[21:39] <hatch> it's always been a thorn for me
[21:39] <Makyo> I think it made more sense in an earlier iteration.
[21:39] <Makyo> Oh well, something for another time.
[21:39] <rick_h_> lazyPower: yes, was on the phone doing manager stuff for a bit :P
[21:40] <lazyPower> yeah sorry about the ping crazyness :(
[21:41] <rick_h_> grr, this sysdeps thing is not working for me here
[21:42] <rick_h_> ah crap, vivid lxc container FML
[21:42] <rick_h_> hatch: have no QA for you atm, have to start over sorry
[21:42] <rick_h_> and uploading GB of stuff for lazyPower is making this brutal
[21:42] <hatch> :) np Makyo is on it
[21:42] <rick_h_> hatch: please get QA from gui from someone else
[21:43] <rick_h_> ty Makyo
[21:43] <lazyPower> GIVE ME ALL YOUR BANDWIDTH MWAHAHA
[21:43] <lazyPower> rick_h_: if its a better option - just hit me with what you're working on now, the others can wait until an overnight xfer
[21:44] <rick_h_> lazyPower: np, Makyo has my back and I'm going to feed the dog/etc and just let the bandwidth go
[21:44] <lazyPower> 10-4
[21:44] <rick_h_> should see the sharepoint iso showing up now
[21:44] <rick_h_> and then you'll have to wait forever on my upstream to pull it from guimaas
[21:44] <rick_h_> run that overnight heh
[21:44] <lazyPower> i feel like we've reverted to 90's style transfer of files....
[21:44] <lazyPower> like, xdcc
[21:44] <lazyPower> fxp
[21:44] <hatch> haha
[21:44] <lazyPower> all pre bt options
[21:45] <hatch> eff tee pee
[21:45] <hatch> ess eff tee pee
[21:45] <hatch> :)
[21:45] <lazyPower> hatch: pleb - distribution hubs used server => server transfers :P
[21:45] <hatch> haha
[21:46] <lazyPower> i'm not going to say how i know this... but it might be from the scene... http://www.welcometothescene.com/
[22:00] <huwshimi> Morning
[22:00] <rick_h_> morning huwshimi
[22:01] <rick_h_> lazyPower: ok, best of luck downloading now
[22:01] <lazyPower> ta rick_h_, cheers!
[22:06] <Makyo> hatch, the more I think about it, the more we might want to escalate the Location link, since it's no longer the same as the deploy link.
[22:06] <Makyo> hatch, I mean before the design stuff in the pipeline.
[22:06] <hatch> Makyo: I always thought it was supposed to be the bzr location
[22:07] <hatch> morning huwshimi
[22:08] <Makyo> hatch, used to be that the charmstore URL ("cs:") was what you could dump into quickstart.  Now that they've diverged, I think it should be one or the other - quickstart or bzr.
[22:08] <hatch> Makyo: well both charms and bundles have the location so probably should be bzr
[22:08] <hatch> since you can't use qs for charms
[22:09] <Makyo> hatch, sure.  I think in that case, that we should promote the deploy tab (or the information)
[22:09] <Makyo> Just deemphasize the basket.
[22:11] <Makyo> Just a thought, not actionable.
[22:12] <hatch> bundles have the cs: and charms have lp:
[22:12] <hatch> lol
[22:12] <hatch> oy
[22:12] <Makyo> Yeah, and some of the future stuff is a unification of styles toward first class bundles, just thinking about iterative approaches.


[00:27] <berglh> getting a lot of video ghosting/stuttering
[00:28] <berglh> in 17.04
[02:05] <berglh> i upgraded from 16.10
[02:05] <berglh> it's on an xps 9560 with 4K display
[02:05] <berglh> bumblebee setup for running optirun
[02:05] <berglh> window elements appear and disappear
[02:06] <berglh> if i type in the terminal that screen stutters all over the place
[02:06] <berglh> i think there is a problem with inplace upgrade at least at the level i was at
[02:06] <berglh> running a live USB gnome 17.04 does not replicate the problem
[02:07] <berglh> i tried a new user login, but noticed this was all happening at the login screen as well indicating a GDM issue afaik
[02:07] <berglh> i'm fairly confident that a reinstall will fix this
[02:29] <berglh> i think it has something to do with hidpi
[02:29] <berglh> at the login screen everything is at naitive 4K res
[02:35] <berglh> something is pretty wrong
[02:35] <berglh> definitely seems to be related to hidpi
[02:35] <berglh> guess i just have to go for reinstall
[03:55] <berglh> clean install fixed it
[12:35] <Optimus_Prime> I installed the latest version of gnome, I'm trying to install chrome atm, I downloaded it through web browser and opened it in software installer, but when I click install nothing happens
[12:45] <darkxst> Optimus_Prime, could be https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1573206
[12:46] <darkxst> Optimus_Prime, you can always install the .deb with `dpkg -i .deb`
[12:48] <darkxst> or gdebi
[16:19] <jbicha> probably bug 1672424
[17:26] <eldon> Is it just me or is the legacy notification tray broken in 17.04?


[09:15] <mdke> anyone have an ubuntu-unr installation handy?
[09:19] <persia> mdke, I do.  What do you need?
[09:21] <mdke> persia: is "scrollkeeper" installed?
[09:22] <persia> It *really* shouldn't be, although rarian should
[09:22]  * persia checks
[09:22] <mdke> yes, I'd expect rarian-compat to be installed
[09:23] <persia> Oh, it is.  That's a mistake.
[09:23] <mdke> thought so
[09:23] <mdke> we've had a lot of crasher bug reports on ubuntu-docs with the ubuntu-unr tag
[09:23] <mdke> we haven't seen those since the bad old scrollkeeper days
[09:24] <mdke> shall I file a bug?
[09:24] <persia> Please :)
[09:24] <persia> It ought be filed against mobile-meta
[09:24] <mdke> what package/project?
[09:24] <mdke> ok, thanks
[09:24] <persia> mobile-meta (Ubuntu)
[09:24] <persia> I suspect rarian-compat needs to be explicitly seeded.
[09:25] <persia> I'm not sure it can be fixed sensibly in an SRU though :(  We can make sure it's gone for karmic alpha 2 though.
[09:25] <mdke> I'll leave that to you guys
[09:28] <mdke> persia: ok, it's bug 377522, thanks for the help
[09:29] <persia> mdke, Thanks for finding and reporting it :)
[09:32] <mdke> no worries