[00:01] <xnox> vorlon: thank you
[00:03] <xnox> vorlon: is it normal that https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/nbs.html is full of kernels?
[00:31] <vorlon> xnox: yes. :|
[01:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: makedumpfile (lunar-proposed/main) [1:1.7.2-1 => 1:1.7.2-1ubuntu0.1] (core)
[02:53] <xnox> vorlon: we really need stable series NBS reports too, because this is pain
[06:47] <vorlon> xnox: well, we know there are always stable series NBS packages that we don't want to delete...
[07:08] <vorlon> tsimonq2: has anyone flagged LP: #2036999 to you?  netplan+network-manager changes mean that any code calamares currently has for copying wifi settings from the live environment probably needs updating
[07:08] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036999 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity: Wifi password not copied to new install" [High, Fix Released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2036999
[08:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Unity Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Cinnamon Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008.1) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[08:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] (20231008.1) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+icicle [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+licheerv [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+nezha [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+visionfive2 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[10:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64 [Mantic Final] (20231008) has been added
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.11 (mantic-proposed/main) [3.11.6-2 => 3.11.6-3] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-cairo-sys-rs (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-2 => 0.18.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-cairo-sys-rs [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.2-1]
[12:38] <guiverc> vorlon, your question earlier to tsimonq2 relates to ubiquity; Lubuntu uses calamares installer
[12:39] <guiverc> ie. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2036999 should have no impact on lubuntu (in my opinion)
[12:39] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2036999 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "ubiquity: Wifi password not copied to new install" [High, Fix Released]
[12:41] <guiverc> or was the issue something else; I've noted no issues with our QA of Lubuntu; https://phab.lubuntu.me/w/release-team/testing-checklist/ though 20230928 the last wifi internet I see (later all ethernet or no-internet on quick scan)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet8 [amd64] (mantic-proposed) [8.0.100-8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dotnet8 [arm64] (mantic-proposed) [8.0.100-8.0.0~rc1-0ubuntu1]
[12:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3.11 (mantic-proposed/main) [3.11.6-2 => 3.11.6-3] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:48] <guiverc> ignore what I said earlier sorry ^  i can't confirm what install result is as overwritten; tsimonq2 ^
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3.11 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [3.11.6-3]
[12:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python3.11 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [3.11.6-3]
[13:42] <guiverc> vorlon, kc2bez just tested & lubuntu is impacted (no wifi post install reboot) for lubuntu mantic
[15:02] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Thank you very much for bringing that bug to my attention. I'm working on a fix for it now (but yes, I do consider it an RC bug).
[15:35] <fossfreedom_> Hi release team. Please can you ok the UB iso rebuild to allow us to test this RC issue. https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntubudgie/+bug/2038754
[15:35] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2038754 in Ubuntu Budgie "Ubuntu Budgie crashed during install without internet" [Undecided, New]
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop (Legacy) amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231008.2)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Mantic Final] has been updated (20231008.1)
[15:38] <fossfreedom_> OK. Excellent.
[16:21] <tsimonq2> I've just uploaded lubuntu-default-settings which fixes a wallpaper UX issue. It's a one-line change that I've already tested. Please accept :)
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (mantic-proposed/universe) [23.10.3 => 23.10.4] (lubuntu)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gir-rust-code-generator (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.1-2 => 0.18.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gir-rust-code-generator [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.2-1]
[16:42] <tsimonq2> vorlon: calamares upload incoming which fixes that bug. Tested it myself. Thanks again for the heads-up.
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.3.0-alpha2-0ubuntu5 => 3.3.0-alpha2-0ubuntu6] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (mantic-proposed/universe) [1:23.10.3 => 1:23.10.4] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[17:21] <tsimonq2> To be clear, at this point Lubuntu has three uploads I'd really like in (or at the very least reviewed) before final. Those are lubuntu-default-settings, calamares, and calamares-settings-ubuntu.
[17:46] <mwhudson> how on fire are things today?
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accerciser (mantic-proposed/universe) [3.40.0-2 => 3.42.0-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-glib-macros (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-2 => 0.18.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-glib-macros [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.2-1]
[18:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gdk4 (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3 => 0.7.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gdk4 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.3-1]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gsk4 (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3 => 0.7.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gsk4-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-2 => 0.7.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gsk4-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.3-1]
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gsk4 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.3-1]
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cinnamon (mantic-proposed/universe) [5.8.4-1ubuntu2 => 5.8.4-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:43] <vorlon> fossfreedom_: I'm not sure what you mean wrt "ok the UB iso rebuild" fwiw
[21:44] <vorlon> mwhudson: not very.  there were some issues with git.launchpad.net overnight (my night) that caused a lot of the candidate images to fail to build and I'm still working on retriggering them.  And we've got some lubuntu packages in the queue to review.  Otherwise things are looking sane to me; I haven't heard back yet whether the util-linux fix sorted us on MAAS?
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lubuntu-default-settings [source] (mantic-proposed) [23.10.4]
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares [source] (mantic-proposed) [3.3.0-alpha2-0ubuntu6]
[21:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted calamares-settings-ubuntu [source] (mantic-proposed) [1:23.10.4]
[21:55] <vorlon> tsimonq2: ^^ the packages are accepted; I'm afk for a while but will try to kick a respin once they've migrated.  Image builds are currently spotty because of https://git.launchpad.net issues
[22:09] <xnox> vorlon: yes git access inside builders is ongoing issue. had to retrigger snap builds with failure to clone git a lot
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Minimal amd64 [Mantic Final] (20231008.1) has been added
[22:16] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: the cinnamon upload fixes a pretty nasty bug where the users couldn't switch wallpaper (would cause the entire desktop to crash), pretty sure ItzSwirlz will want a respin.
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gtk4 (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3 => 0.7.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gtk4-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-2 => 0.7.3-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gtk4-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.3-2]
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gtk4 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.3-2]
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-gdk4-wayland-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-2 => 0.7.2-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-gdk4-wayland-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.7.2-3]
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-pango (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.0-3 => 0.18.0-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-pango [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.0-4]
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-libadwaita (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2 => 0.5.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-libadwaita-sys (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.5.2-2 => 0.5.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-libadwaita-sys [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.5.3-1]
[22:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-libadwaita [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.5.3-1]
[22:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rust-cairo-sys-rs (mantic-proposed/universe) [0.18.2-1 => 0.18.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rust-cairo-sys-rs [sync] (mantic-proposed) [0.18.2-2]
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Mantic Final] (20231008.1) has been added
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Mantic Final] (20231008.1) has been added
[23:36] <vorlon> xnox: it's not just inside builders fwiw, it's anything over https (so generally doesn't affect authenticated users).
[23:58] <mwhudson> vorlon: fginther tested a version of the fix but not the package from the archive afaik


[03:18] <geofft> regarding the discussion about xmonad last night: it looks like this affects all WMs set in .gconf
[03:18] <geofft> that is, if your .gconf in Intrepid specified a window manager, you don't get one in Jaunty
[03:19] <geofft> I can find discussion on the web and on e-mail, and LP bugs for specific WMs, but not one general one. am I just missing it?
[03:24]  * nixternal hugs his 'startx' with xmonad :)
[03:24] <owen1_> is there ubuntu reference, similar to debian's - http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/reference/ ?
[03:25] <nixternal> owen1_: there are a bunch of things that would make up something similar to be honest
[03:25] <geofft> nixternal: that is my personal setup too, yes :) no GNOME on this laptop :)
[03:25] <nixternal> no one stop shop for such a thing unfortunately
[03:25] <nixternal> geofft: FTW! :)
[03:26] <geofft> but this is biting a bunch of our users
[03:27] <geofft> so I count bugs 378111, 348432, 366166, and 340140 as conceivably all the same issue.
[03:27] <owen1_> nixternal: like what?
[03:28] <nixternal> owen1_: various documents on help.ubuntu.com, and then various documents under wiki.ubuntu.com
[03:28] <nixternal> owen1_: oh, and the Debian Reference itself can be utilized to an extent :)  yes, a bit of cheating, but it works in a lot of cases
[03:30] <owen1_> i want to learn about the boot process, what apps are running on boot, why and how to control it. can i do it by reading the debian's docs?
[03:31] <nixternal> there is something on the wiki concerning boot process, but I do not know exactly where...I came across it a month or so back
[03:33] <geofft> owen1_: have you seen upstart's man pages and /etc/event.d?
[03:33] <owen1_> geofft: no
[03:35] <geofft> see man init, man initctl, etc., and the docs in that directory and in /usr/share/doc/upstart-compat-sysv/README.Debian.gz
[03:36] <owen1_> geofft: thanks, i'll take a look. i am curious, how come there is no centeralize place on the web for ubuntu, as red-hat and debian?
[03:37] <geofft> huh? there certainly is ubuntu.com :) wiki.ubuntu.com may be more helpful
[03:38] <owen1_> geofft: ok. i'll check them out. thanks
[03:40] <geofft> anyway. Anyone have ideas on what in GConf could have broken the window manager preference that worked in Intrepid?
[03:41] <ebroder> geofft - what setting did we use for <=Intrepid? Googling pointed me at /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager; another at that one and also /desktop/gnome/applications/window_manager/current
[03:43] <ebroder> Huh - looks like we were setting /desktop/gnome/session/required_components/windowmanager
[03:45] <owen1_> geofft: i can't find anything technical here:  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
[03:50] <geofft> owen1_: what are you looking for? there are a lot of technical docs deeper within that site
[03:52] <owen1_> geofft: mainly the boot process. i was just curious if there is anything online simiar to debian. the links you sent me are not low level, at least i couldn't find any.
[03:53] <owen1_> geofft: even the server guide is mainly about installing appse
[03:53] <owen1_> geofft: apps.
[03:53] <owen1_> geofft: i guess my best bet is the man pages you mentioned.
[03:54] <owen1_> geofft: unless i missed a link on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/
[03:56] <geofft> owen1_: if I search for "upstart", there's a little bit of helpful stuff
[03:58] <owen1_> geofft: isn't ubuntu used for production server?  is there a place for ubuntu sys admin to look for this stuff?
[07:46] <hegde> hi all
[07:47] <hegde> i have a laptop with an sdcard reader in it....all the cards that i insert is mounting in /dev/sdb1 .....is there any way to get the sdcard name???? like CANON MEMORY CARD
[07:49] <wgrant> hegde: This isn't a support channel; you want #ubuntu.
[07:55] <maco> wgrant, i have a devel question.  if an sru has been uploaded to universe and it got an ACK from motu-sru, how does it move forward out of the unapproved queue?
[07:55] <wgrant> maco: You wait for an archive admin to do it on their archive day, I guess.
[07:56] <wgrant> maco: But that might take a while, given that {{Some,All}Hands,UDS} is happening.
[07:56] <maco> ah ok. thanks
[08:11] <mdke> do developers tend to use virtual machines when testing SRUs for previous releases, and if so, what is the software of choice? I've been using virtualbox but it's a bit of a drag to set up the different guests
[08:12] <hyperair> they go into -proposed, and users test them.
[08:12] <mdke> hyperair: I'm thinking that developers test the packages before uploading them, though
[08:12] <hyperair> also, all virtual machine solutions require you to set up guests.
[08:13] <mdke> but, doesn't vmware provide images which are pre-setup?
[08:13] <hyperair> well.
[08:13] <hyperair> i'm not sure
[08:13] <hyperair> but it's pointless isn't it, if you're gonig to require a vanilla ubuntu ______ system anyway?
[08:14] <mdke> I assumed that the vmware images were "vanilla"
[08:14] <mdke> also I wondered if other virtual machines were easier to setup than virtualbox
[08:15] <maco> virtualbox is pretty easy...i mean, it has a GUI!
[08:15] <mdke> it's ok, but you have to go through the Ubuntu installation process, then install the extra modules on the guest so that you get proper screen resolution
[08:16] <maco> you can save the image and pass it around if you like
[08:16] <mdke> takes a while, and I'm setting up one for each supported version of Ubuntu
[08:16] <maco> i had a alpha5 jaunty on the pirate bay
[08:17] <maco> i recommend snapshotting right after install that way you can go back to vanilla after each test
[08:17] <mdke> that doesn't really help me though because I'd like a separate machine for each version, snapshots don't really interest me
[08:18] <hyperair> the point here is having a separate machine for each version, and snapshotting the vanilla install
[08:18] <mdke> I'll use virtualbox if I have to, of course, but I was curious about what others use
[08:18] <hyperair> hence after each test, you can revert to the vanilla install
[08:18] <hyperair> i.e. ~0 maintenance
[08:19] <mdke> well, I might do that, but the testing I'm going to do is quite minor, so reverting a test package I've installed takes 5 seconds
[08:19] <mdke> I think my question still stands though
[08:21] <lesshaste> hi all
[08:23] <lesshaste> ulimit -m doesn't seem to do anything in hardy
[08:23] <lesshaste> is this a known feature?
[08:24] <lesshaste> (ulimit -v 0; exec top)
 Killed
[08:24] <lesshaste> that's correct
[08:24] <lesshaste> but ulimit -m does nothing as far as I can tell
[08:28] <lesshaste> there is a long discussion about the 2.4 kernel http://mail.nl.linux.org/kernelnewbies/2002-07/msg00131.html which says that -m doesn't do what you might think
[08:28] <lesshaste> is this also true for modern kernels, and if so shouldn't the docs for ulimit be updated?
[08:29] <maco> mdke, if you look around online, you can probably find vbox images for many of the releases
[08:33] <mdke> maco: ok, I will have a look, thanks
[08:34] <mdke> I'm still interested to find out what other developers use, though
[08:35] <Hobbsee> mdke: you might ask sometime when most of them aren't at all hands, fwiw
[08:35] <maco> i used kvm when i was testing unstable and knew my hardware was a bad idea with that version
[08:35] <lesshaste> or should I just report a documentation bug?
[08:35] <maco> All Hands *without internet*
[08:35] <maco> plus, the American developers are asleep
[08:36] <mdke> Hobbsee: I'll do that; but we do have some developers left, as you've demonstrated :)
[08:37] <Hobbsee> mdke: sure, but I try to avoid doing SRU work, as i don't tend to run the releases after they've released for long.  So i don't count ;)
[08:38] <Hobbsee> mdke: there was a bugsquad community position for someone to regularly create and update virtualbox / other images, though.  i'm not sure it ever got filled.
[08:38] <mdke> interesting
[08:41] <stefanlsd> mdke: i have vbox for testing gui related stuff. if its not gui, i often just use pbuilder chroot with --login option...
[08:42] <mdke> stefanlsd: thanks, that's helpful
[08:44] <mdke> I'll carry on with vbox too
[08:52] <lesshaste> anyone on jaunty care to do "man bash" and then search for "ulimit" and tell me what it says for "-m" ?
[09:06] <Nicke> lesshaste: Have you checked http://manpages.ubuntu.com/ ?
[10:35] <ulel> hi
[10:35] <ulel> anyone running a cluster here
[10:35] <ulel> on ubuntu
[10:36] <slangasek> ulel: this isn't really an appropriate channel for such questions; you might try #ubuntu-server
[10:37] <ulel> ok
[11:43] <quadrispro> wgrant: hi! http://qa.ubuntuwire.com/uehs is outdated, could you refresh it?
[11:51] <wgrant> quadrispro: Looking, thanks.
[11:51] <quadrispro> :)
[12:10] <wgrant> quadrispro: It doesn't seem to be misbehaving any more, so it should be updating now.
[12:16] <quadrispro> wgrant: thank you
[13:22] <calc> Hobbsee: there is internet in all but the plenary room
[13:22] <calc> Hobbsee: but we aren't really supposed to be using the net
[13:22] <Hobbsee> calc: ahhh
[13:23] <calc> Hobbsee: coming to UDS next week?
[13:24] <Hobbsee> calc: nope.  Been smashed with uni work and real life
[13:24] <calc> Hobbsee: ah ok
[13:24] <Hobbsee> i won't make it to another one until this time next year, if I make it at all.
[13:24] <calc> ok
[16:30] <geofft> ebroder: so, I have both of those gconf keys set to "Metacity" (since early April) and I don't get a window manager on Jaunty
[16:31] <geofft> er, "metacity". Should it be a full path or something?
[16:39] <geofft> okay, setting either one of those to a full path doesn't help.
[16:40] <ScottK> geofft: I think you want #ubuntu
[16:42] <geofft> hm, potentially. Although I know there's a bug here.
[16:43] <ScottK> Then maybe you want #ubuntu-bug
[18:42] <toiyeuvietnam> alo
[18:42] <toiyeuvietnam> ai chat ty ko nhy.?
[18:42] <toiyeuvietnam> ko ngu dc
[18:44] <Pici> !vn
[18:45] <hunger_t> Is there any estimation for fglrx debs working with karmic possible at this time?
[19:04] <ScottK> hunger: You might ask in #ubuntu-x
[19:05] <hunger> ScottK: Thanks!
[19:05] <hunger> ScottK: Not that important since the jaunty kernel is working fine and has fglrx :-)
[19:19] <okayzed> has anyone been following IMA in the kernel dev?
[19:20] <okayzed> IMA = integrity measurement architecture
[19:22] <Pici> okayzed: You may want to ask in #ubuntu-kernel
[19:23] <okayzed> thanks
[19:49] <maxb> ooi, what caused the mass-giveback today?
[19:51] <Jihui_Choi> I'm remastering ubuntu live iso.
[19:52] <Jihui_Choi> using uck. I updated all packages and it applied on live iso.
[19:53] <Jihui_Choi> however after I installed ubuntu on my system using my live iso, the update manager asked me to update packages.
[19:53] <Jihui_Choi> How can I updated them?
[21:05] <diddly> hi all, i'm trying to debug a Qt4 based app, but gdb isn't stepping into Qt code after i installed libqt4-debug
[21:07] <maxb> Hi, are there any util-linux maintainers around who could explain how best to submit a debdiff and/or request changesets be pulled from upstream's git, given the rather unique style of packaging of the source package (being a git repo based off upstream's) ?
[21:08] <ScottK> maxb: You'll want to talk to lamon
[21:08] <ScottK> maxb: lamont even
[21:08] <maxb> lamont: ping?
[21:08] <maxb> (thanks ScottK )
[22:01] <YokoZar> Is there a reason lib32asound2 suggests libasound2-plugins rather than lib32asound2-plugins ?
[22:16] <lamont> maxb: you want to tell me which git commit you want pulled back to which branch
[22:16] <ScottK> You are lamont the great.  You're supposed to know this stuff.
[22:20] <lamont> ScottK: heh
[22:20] <lamont> well, there are days I'd like to pull all of the commits back, but that's not so feasible.
[22:20] <lamont> anyway,  bed time for me.
[22:23] <maxb> lamont: bug 377395
[22:23] <lamont> it'll probably be monday, unless keybuk beats me to it


[14:22] <k1l> Dreaman> k1l  kak e nervaka :)
[14:22] <k1l> why is he still poking at me
[14:42] <k1l> we had a "ivan" with similar behavior and evading bans before.
 rek google the error
[21:01] <k1l> not the first time, and not the first time he got told that we dont do this in #ubuntu


 I don't have the solution but what icon theme did you select? (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <rehhouari> https://files.catbox.moe/n6extj.jpg)
[14:04] <wunderwungiel> Hello
[14:05] <wunderwungiel> Is anyone online? ;)
 I am
 but I'm not that resourceful 😆
 What could we do for you? (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <wunderwungiel> Is anyone online? ;))
[16:19] <Maik> they left one minute after asking
 Ok (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <Maik> they left one minute after asking)
 Hi, everyone! If possible, I'd like to ask a question about LVM I am having wonderful troubles with.
 I'm working on a virtual machine with Ubuntu 16.04 (I was guided to this chat and assured there are competent people who can help), and upon trying to build LLVM from sources, I got into a problem of lack of virtual disk space. I tried to increase virtual hard disk first via VMWare Player I am using, and then I was attempting to expand the file system of the guest OS so as it could use the newly available space. Therefore, I met with
 What could be the problem there? Has anybody ever met this? What could I do?
 It would be really great if you provided more details about the installation such as partition table, file systems etc
 It is also important that 16.04 is EOL and is not supported. Consider upgrading your system