[00:00] <ScottK> shadeslayer: We want the latest git, don't we?
[00:00] <ScottK> So I'm confused.
[00:00] <shadeslayer> hmm, true enough
[00:01] <shadeslayer> from what I read on the ML, all kio-mtp bugs are now fixed
[00:02] <shadeslayer> ScottK: uploaded
[00:02] <ScottK> THanks.
[00:02] <ScottK> Yep.  THat's why I suggested updating.
[01:14] <valorie> since I got updates a few days ago, the screenlocker no longer works
[01:15] <valorie> love the screenlocker; where to file the bug?
[02:13] <ScottK> b.k.o
[02:13] <smartboyhw> ?
[02:18]  * valorie is in the midst of listening to the meeting
[02:18] <valorie> so far, great!
[02:20] <valorie> \o/ for shirts
[02:20] <valorie> boo for no fezzes
[02:43] <valorie> I loved it
[02:44] <valorie> sure hope I can get mumble working before the next one
[02:44] <valorie> I think the mp3 link should be on the etherpad
[02:44] <valorie> and/or wiki page
[07:32] <test> Hi there, I just updated Kubuntu Quantal to Raring and after user login XServer immediately crashes - http://paste.ubuntu.com/5618592/  any idea?
[07:42] <valorie> oooo
[07:44] <test> hi valorie
[07:44] <valorie> hi test
[07:44] <test> well, starting over with precise install
[07:45] <valorie> sorry, not a developer so I don't know, but I'm planning to upgrade at least one if not two computers to test the upgrade
[07:45] <test> since there's no alternate installer for quantal or raring
[07:45] <test> and encryption doesn't work customized
[08:46] <lordievader> Good morning
[09:03] <Mamarok> test: make sure you have kde-workspace-randr
[09:03] <test> Mamarok: yes, have it
[09:03] <Mamarok> likely a packaging error, but I thought that was fixed. How did you upgrade?
[09:03] <test> do-release-upgrade -d
[09:04] <Mamarok> right, but you must have some missing package somewhere
[09:05] <Mamarok> try to look for other missing packages in kde-workspace
[09:05] <test> well, wiped it and did another install from 12.04 since there's no alternate installer anymore
[09:06] <Mamarok> why 12.04? That is old, you should at least have 1.10 by now
[09:06] <Mamarok> 12.10
[09:06] <test> no alternate installer since 12.10
[09:07] <Mamarok> why do you need the alternate installer?
[09:07] <test> for manually setting the encrypted partitions
[09:08] <test> the desktop install can neither activated existing encrypted partitions and even creating new ones makes it fail
[09:08] <Mamarok> encrypted how?
[09:09] <test> what do you mean how?
[09:09] <yofel> encrypted LVM
[09:09] <test> no lvm
[09:09] <yofel> ubiquity's manual partitioner can't do that yet
[09:09] <yofel> ah
[09:09] <test> I don't like lvm
[09:10] <test> (1) start installer
[09:10] <test> (2) select to manually partition the disk
[09:10] <test> (3) create a partition
[09:10] <test> (4) select it to be encrypted
[09:10] <test> --> error regarding encryption keys$
[09:10] <test> also when you have ssd, you want to adjust the cryptsetup payload from default
[09:10] <test> so you could ctrl-alt-f2
[09:11] <test> and issue:  cryptsetup luksFormat --align-payload=8192 /dev/sda2
[09:11] <test> once done, you go back to installer and just activate that partition
[09:11] <test> that's not possible in the gui installer either
[09:13] <Mamarok> hm, that is unfortunate
[09:13] <test> so what I did now is
[09:13] <test> install from alternate 12.04
[09:13] <Mamarok> then upgrade
[09:13] <test> alter lts to normal in the /etc/update-manager/release-something-file
[09:13] <test> do-release-upgrade -d
[09:13] <test> do it a second time to update to raring
[09:14] <test> and then run tasksel to install kubuntu-dekstop
[09:14] <test> that seems now to work
[09:14] <test> before I did install kubuntu-desktop upon installtion.... but now I just did basic ubuntu install with openssh-server and no desktop
[09:14] <test> makes the do-release-upgrade faster
[09:15] <yofel> wouldn't it have been easier to install ubuntu-server 13.04?
[09:15] <yofel> that just doesn't ship a DE
[09:15] <test> didn't have an ISO by hand
[09:15] <yofel> ah ok
[09:15] <test> but its a good idea
[09:15] <test> although kernel needs then to be changed to -generic
[09:16] <yofel> that is generic these days - unless they changed it again
[09:16] <test> didn't server have a seperate kernel?
[09:16] <yofel> there was -server once, but it was merged with -generic
[09:17] <test> re-install almost done..... previously installed apps get installed and backup data pulled from local backup server
[09:17] <test> didn't know about the merge
[09:17] <test> haven't used ubuuntu server for a long time.... current servers I setup I do with debian wheezy
[09:17] <yofel> ah
[09:18] <yofel> I think we now only have -generic, -virtual and -lowlatency
[09:18] <yofel> and some rt variant
[09:18] <test> debian added a while back a nice feature to remotely reboot encrypted fileservers
[09:18] <yofel> nice
[09:18] <test> not sure if ubuntu did that also
[09:20] <test> basicaly they provide an easy way to integrate dropbear and early network start into the intiramfs and a script that does the unlocking and contiuation of boot
[09:35] <yofel> meh, I'll need to debug the tmpfs usage in the upgrade tester
[09:36] <yofel> for some reason it's not releasing memory after cleanup()
[10:20] <mitya57> hi, can anybody please look at lp:~mitya57/kubuntu-packaging/qt-lp1094360?
[10:20] <mitya57> it should fix bug 1094360
[12:38] <BluesKaj> Hey folks
[15:32] <shadeslayer> yofel: have you ever used kvm such that any changes to the img file are non persistent?
[15:58] <yofel> shadeslayer: no, and I wouldn't know how to do that without snapshotting
[15:58] <shadeslayer> brrr
[15:59] <yofel> wth happened to grub though.
[15:59] <yofel> the OS selection suddenly has a Debian logo, and says "Kubuntu GNU/Linux"
[16:00] <shadeslayer> hahah
[16:01] <shadeslayer> We defected
[16:01] <shadeslayer> that's what happened
[16:01] <yofel> totally :D
[16:01] <shadeslayer> apachelogger sekretly made the change
[16:02] <Quintasan> lol
[16:02] <shadeslayer> yofel: my upgrade failed because tmpfs says it ran out of space
[16:02] <shadeslayer> totally not true seeing how I have so much free RAM
[16:03] <yofel> tmpfs default is RAM/2
[16:03] <yofel> I have override code for that here
[16:03] <yofel> lemme commit that
[16:03] <yofel> I have issues with tmpfs not freeing memory though :S
[16:05] <yofel> shadeslayer: bzr up
[16:05] <yofel> now I'm setting it to fixed 12G
[16:05] <shadeslayer> heh
[16:05] <shadeslayer> ok
[16:06] <shadeslayer> bzr and git feel so orthogonal
[16:06] <yofel> bzr--
[16:06] <yofel> git++
[16:06] <shadeslayer> I keep doing bzr pull in bzr and git up at times
[16:06] <yofel> perfectly orthogonal
[16:07] <yofel> haha
[16:08] <shadeslayer> yofel: we should get these changes merged into lp:auto-upgrade-tester :)
[16:08] <yofel> most of them, yeah
[16:20] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: yofel: hm?
[17:16] <murthy> hello everyone
[17:17] <yofel> bah, this is too weird
[17:17] <yofel> no tmpfs for me :(
[17:17] <murthy> yofel: that means swap disabled?
[17:18] <yofel> no, when I run the upgrade tester the data in tmpfs isn't destroyed after it finishes
[17:18] <yofel> but I find no mounted tmpfs
[17:18] <murthy> daily or beta 1?
[17:18] <yofel> daily
[17:19] <yofel> now I have 7G RAM + 4G swap filled with junk
[17:19] <murthy> thats bad
[17:19] <murthy> yofel: did you confirm with other testers?
[17:20] <yofel> not yet
[17:20] <yofel> shadeslayer should try it again
[17:20] <yofel> also new kernel in archive
[17:20]  * yofel reboots
[17:22] <yofel> ok, next try
[17:22] <murthy> new kernel? i have to test then, updating the image
[17:23] <yofel> yeah, -13
[17:24] <yofel> well, we won't need tmpfs for the production tests anyway. But it's really weird
[17:24] <murthy> ya
[18:34] <markey> apachelogger: hey, what's the state of that pGst backport?
[18:34] <markey> this streaming bug is driving me nuts
[18:34] <apachelogger> pending testing?
[18:34] <markey> ah yes, I thought that I forgot something :)
[18:35] <apachelogger> markey: bug 1115276 bug 1115270 bug 1115286 bug 1115277 bug 918688
[18:35] <markey> cheers
[18:36] <markey> how can I get the package?
[18:36] <markey> it's lost in backlog
[18:36] <apachelogger> see ScottK's comment on the bugs
[18:37] <apachelogger> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed
[18:37] <markey> ok
[18:38] <markey> hey, just out of interest, can you point me to the commit that fixed this bug?
[18:38] <markey> streaming I mean
[18:38] <apachelogger> see git log I guess
[18:38] <apachelogger> should contain the string webkit I think
[18:39] <markey> I did. it looked like you pushed a huge bunch of commits without rebasing. or you're writing horrible commit logs in general ;)
[18:39] <apachelogger> ScottK, Riddell: bug 1156019
[18:39] <apachelogger> markey: in pgst?
[18:40] <apachelogger> actually doesn't matter, maintenance branches do not get merges ^^
[18:40] <apachelogger> markey: efdc92f2de8dc47abbc5af2de9c2bcc5e6cf0200
[18:40] <markey> cheers honey
[18:41] <apachelogger> :*
[18:42] <markey> meh, I'll just build from source
[18:42] <apachelogger> markey: you'll need to use the package to verify the bugs as fixed
[18:43] <markey> right
[18:43] <markey> we can pretend I'm using it
[18:43] <apachelogger> it's about QAing the package, not some git hash ^^
[18:43] <apachelogger> yofel, shadeslayer: ddebs vs. -dbg?
[18:43] <markey> -dbg
[18:44] <apachelogger> sheytan: ping
[18:45] <apachelogger> shadeslayer: also am I getting this right that rekonq master is actually not building at all? Oo
[18:48] <yofel> apachelogger: for PPA?
[18:48] <yofel> -dbg would be the more space efficient solution. .ddeb the easier one
[18:48]  * yofel preferst -dbg but is lazy
[18:48] <yofel> *prefers
[18:49] <apachelogger> just wondering
[18:49] <apachelogger> becuse you have a card for adding autogeneration of -dbg
[18:49] <yofel> I added that before shadeslayer added the one for ddebs
[18:57] <ScottK> apachelogger: Approved.
[18:57] <ScottK> apachelogger: Did you know there's a package in the archive called hslogger?
[18:58] <apachelogger> lol, no
[18:58] <apachelogger> !info hslogger
[18:58] <apachelogger> !info hslogger raring
[18:58] <apachelogger> ScottK: ubottu doesn't either :P
[18:58] <ScottK> It's a source package name.
[18:58] <ScottK> !info libghc-hslogger-prof
[18:59] <apachelogger> ah
[18:59] <apachelogger> haskell ftw!
[19:59] <blaze> how i supposed to run qmake-qt5 in raring?
[20:31] <shadeslayer> blaze: just call qmake-qt5 ?
[20:31] <shadeslayer> !find qmake-qt5
[20:32] <blaze> No command 'qmake-qt5' found
[20:32] <blaze> it's installed
[20:33] <shadeslayer> !find qmake-qt5 raring
[20:33] <shadeslayer> silly bot
[20:33] <shadeslayer> heh fun
[20:34] <shadeslayer> blaze: did you make sure qt5-qmake is installed?
[20:34] <blaze> sure
[20:36] <shadeslayer> can you run : dpkg -S qmake-qt5
[20:36] <blaze> here's the output of dpkg -L http://wklej.org/hash/44e300d41b2/txt/
[20:37] <murthy> its just qmake ?
[20:38] <shadeslayer> ohm
[20:38] <shadeslayer> murthy: seems so
[20:38] <shadeslayer> blaze: /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/qt5/bin/qmake
[20:38] <shadeslayer> that's what you want to run
[20:38] <blaze> qmake is qmake-qt4
[20:39] <shadeslayer> ahh
[20:39] <shadeslayer> blaze: can you check what ls -l /usr/bin/qmake-qt5 says
[20:40] <blaze> ls: cannot access /usr/bin/qmake-qt5: No such file or directory
[20:40] <shadeslayer> 0.o
[20:41] <shadeslayer> installed it, apparently it doesn't symlink a binary called qmake-qt5
[20:41] <murthy> ldd wont tell?
[20:42] <shadeslayer> what does ldd have to do with this 0.o
[20:42] <shadeslayer> blaze: anyway, I'm not quite sure why they don't have it, maybe worth opening a bug report?
[20:42] <murthy> shadeslayer: to know about the current qmake
[20:43] <shadeslayer> murthy: uh, do you know what ldd does?
[20:43] <murthy> shadeslayer: shows the libraries loaded?
[20:43] <blaze> shadeslayer: here's qtchooser but it doesn't work, and yea someone already filed a bug
[20:44] <shadeslayer> awesome
[20:45] <shadeslayer> murthy: so how does that help us in checking which version of qmake does /usr/bin/qmake points to?
[20:45] <shadeslayer> /usr/bin/qmake is basically just a symlink
[20:45] <shadeslayer> and you run ls -l /usr/bin/qmake to find out which qmake it points to
[20:45] <shadeslayer> for me it's lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Mar  5 09:35 /usr/bin/qmake -> qtchooser
[20:48] <murthy> shadeslayer: i thought we would be able to find the version of qmake  if it loads any libraries with some relevant version number, it seems i am wrong, nothing regarding that is loaded
[20:49] <shadeslayer> yep, ldd is not useful at all in this situation since qtchooser will load either of the qmake's according to the settings at runtime
[20:52] <starbuck> is there any way i can find out what to do if plasma-desktop does not want to come up after an update of kubuntu 13.04 alpha to beta and instead it redirects me to lightdm?
[20:59] <murthy> starbuck: come to #ubuntu+1
[21:01] <murthy> apachelogger: about the microblog applet bug, using queuedconnection crashes plasma and when using blockedqueuedconnection plasma-desktop hangs
[21:16] <apachelogger> cool
[21:55] <ScottK> apachelogger: As lord king of multimedia, I ask you ...  should we be aiming at gstreamer0.10 or gstreamer1.0 this cycle?
[21:56] <ScottK> gstreamer0.10-qapt and kubuntu-restricted-extras both suggest we ought to do something perhaps.
[21:59] <murthy> who is lord king of multimedia ?
[22:04] <sreich> how does one know which version of kubuntu they're using?
[22:06] <murthy> sreich: can you come to  #kubuntu ?
[22:07] <lordievader> sreich: lsb_release -a
[22:08] <murthy> lordievader: ty
[22:10] <ScottK> Doing networkmanagement.
[22:18] <hanning> hi
[22:18] <hanning> what happened to oneiric on the backports?
[22:19] <hanning> according to some sites, i should be able to find amarok 2.5 there
[22:19] <ScottK> oneiric is pretty old.  You might consider updating.
[22:19] <ScottK> It goes out of support next month.
[22:20] <ScottK> If you upgrade to 12.04 (precise) it has amarok 2.5.
[22:20] <hanning> i think i spent nearly 1000hrs to modify lubuntu for my htpc-needs, upgrading (reinstalling lubuntu) would be a nightmare
[22:21] <ScottK> upgrading and reinstalling are two different things.
[22:21] <ScottK> After next month you'll have no more security support on oneiric, so you really will need to upgrade.
[22:21] <hanning> as far as i know one cannot update ubuntu without running into problems
[22:22] <ScottK> 12.04 is supported for 5 years, so once you've done that, you won't have to again for a long time.
[22:22] <hanning> hm
[22:22]  * ScottK has systems that have been upgraded from 7.10 to 12.04 incrementally without problems.
[22:23] <hanning> what exactly does "supported" mean? i am specifically trying to get the latest qt, to get amarok 2.7 running
[22:23] <ScottK> In any case, you might find it in a PPA somewhere, but the official answer is use 12.04.
[22:23] <apachelogger> ScottK: 0.10, note however that it can potentially cause problems if half the system is on gst1 and the kde part on 0.10
[22:23] <ScottK> Supported in this case mostly means gets security fixes.
[22:23] <apachelogger> i.e. if both are loaded in the same app -> kaboom
[22:23] <ScottK> apachelogger: OK.  Thanks.
[22:24] <ScottK> But if you want amarok 2.7 and the latest Qt, you really should run the latest release.  13.04 when it comes out next month will have amarok 2.7.
[22:24] <hanning> hm is 13.04 an LTS?
[22:25] <ScottK> No.
[22:25] <ScottK> LTS are every two years.
[22:25] <hanning> oh alright
[22:25]  * ScottK needs to go.  Good luck.
[22:25] <hanning> thansk scott


[00:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python3-antlr3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.5.2-4] (no packageset)
[01:50] <handsome_feng> Hi, I'll appreciate it if someone could help to have a look at the ukwm in bionic new queue. Thank you in advance! LP: #1740252
[01:50] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1740252 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukwm" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740252
[02:01] <foka> ginggs, thank you very much for retriggering the autopkgtests for golang-blackfriday/hugo/golang-github-chaseadamsio-goorgeous!
[02:05] <foka> ginggs, as to where I went (haha), I rebooted my laptop to a pre-release daily build of Lubuntu that my friend installed on a new SSD he purchased.  He got the SSD on-sale for a local weekend Chinese school, but the first one died soon after installing Zorin OS on it (became unwritable), so he returned it and got another one, and this time I recommended Lubuntu (for an older computer).  He asked me to run some more tests to make sure the
[02:05] <foka> SSD is OK this time.  Then there was a long retreat at our church today, so I was gone pretty much the whole day.
[02:05] <foka> (I know, I should have gotten my IRC proxy back up and running, or get IRC working on my Android phone, but I was either too busy or too lazy, haha!
[02:06] <foka> I did get your messages through https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2018/03/11/%23ubuntu-release.html though, so, thank you again!  ;-)
[02:06] <foka> I can go close https://github.com/gohugoio/hugo/issues/4350 now.  Thanks for helping getting the most recent and most stable version of Hugo into bionic!
[02:15] <foka> handsome_feng, for FFe Sync requests, it might be easier if you had used the "requestsync" command...
[02:15] <foka> handsome_feng, Oh wait, ukwm isn't in Debian yet!?  Why not?
[02:22] <handsome_feng> foka: We are currently focusing on the Ubuntu platform, and the man who responsible for the uploads of new UKUI packages to Debian lost his gpg key, which led to the lag of plan...
[02:23] <foka> handsome_feng, Nevertheless, for an "FFe", it seems you have forgotten to subscribe the ubuntu-release team to the bug.
[02:24] <handsome_feng> Oh, Thanks! :)
[02:24] <foka> handsome_feng: What!?  How did your team member lose his GPG key?
[02:24] <foka> handsome_feng: Anyhow, if you need a sponsor for uploading to Debian, you can bug me.  ;-)
[02:27] <foka> handsome_feng, about LP: 1740252, I think it would raise more attention if you mention that Ukwm is to become the *official* window manager for Ubuntu Kylin in bionic.
[02:27] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1740252 in Ubuntu Kylin "[FFe] ukwm" [Critical,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1740252
[02:29] <handsome_feng> foka: I don't know the details, :(. Thank you for your help! and sorry for that I am a bit slow to reply.
[02:30] <foka> handsome_feng, 没关系！你们那边现在星期一了吧？一定是很忙。 No worries!  It must be Monday already in China, right?   Not because it's busy, It is I am looking up the dictionary. :P
[02:33] <foka> handsome_feng, 我是中国人……或者是中国香港人。
[02:33] <handsome_feng> foka: 哇, 开心得流眼泪!
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python3-antlr3 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.5.2-4]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wsmancli [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.6.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> hello release team this is something I think might be beneficial for everybody... what about grouping this page for year? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/
[08:37] <LocutusOfBorg> having all the days since 2014 in the same page is... strange
[09:02] <apw> LocutusOfBorg, i tend to use http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/auto-sync/?C=N;O=D to have the useful ones right there and not worry
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, yes I know, but doing a "mkdir 2014; mv 2014* 2014" and so on, at least until 2017 might make the package more readable and faster loadable
[09:12] <LocutusOfBorg> we can keep all the 2018 entries, but I don't think people needs older years, at least in the "homepage"
[09:12]  * LocutusOfBorg finished his fast-internet mobile plan monthly queue, so will load that page at 128kb for some more days :p
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: llvm-defaults [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.41~exp4] (no packageset)
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[09:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted llvm-defaults [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.41~exp4]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3]
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [2.02~beta3-4ubuntu7.3]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[11:27] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: hey! You around? Looking at the artful virtualbox-ext-pack now and I see something I'd like to double confirm
[11:28] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: in debian/postinst there's version=5.1.32 while the version of the package is 5.1.34 - is that ok?
[11:28] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: same for debian/rules
[11:39] <doko> apw: is the linux autopkg test failure rectified? blocks binutils
[11:40] <apw> why does it block binutils ?
[11:40] <apw> we should have stopped using libbfd
[11:44] <doko> the use of libbfd doesn't affect the autopkg test
[11:52] <apw> doko, oh the s390x thing, i think that is ok, but i will poke seth to confirm
[12:56] <acheronuk> mwhudson: I may have a fix for casper re:kubuntu live session. if it tests of, where and how would be best to submit? bug with a debdiff?
[12:57] <acheronuk> *tests ok
[13:12] <cyphermox> acheronuk: yes
[13:12] <acheronuk> ok. thx
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (artful-proposed/main) [2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 => 2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:01] <sforshee> doko, apw: the linux s390x failure is indeed ok, just a change to the content of /proc/kallsyms that will get changed back in the next upload
[14:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (xenial-proposed/main) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu6 => 2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7.1] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[14:39] <apw> Laney, are you about, i am hearing the ppc64el jobs in bionic might be looping, for the kernel
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-hwe [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-dfsg-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[15:00] <xnox> slangasek, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-scopes-api/+bug/1755184 looks like it is ready to be removed, with an ack from seb.
[15:00] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1755184 in unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [High,Triaged]
[15:20] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, thanks for vbox, please look at my reply wrt ext-pack, and also accept kbuild/xenial to make it build!
[15:22] <sil2100> Yeah, in progress! Got preempted with DMB meeting...
[15:27] <LocutusOfBorg> oooh sorry! I though it was a problem in my process
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> people, AA, please KICK OUT node-rollup-plugin-commonjs from bionic-proposed
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> it is not built, so I hope doable with not much effort
[15:42] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm trying to rollup-bootstrap-rollup-and-itself-changing-bits, and discovered #892742
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:56] <xnox> apw, slangasek, sil2100 - ^^^^ should unbreak btrfs-progs, as these need a libzstd1-udeb. Also package is fixed up to be in a good shape for MIR.
[15:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kbuild [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:0.1.9998svn2814+dfsg-2~ubuntu16.04.1]
[16:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libzstd [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[16:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-guest-additions-iso [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (artful-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted virtualbox-ext-pack [source] (xenial-proposed) [5.1.34-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:21] <doko> apw, sforshee: please could you update the hint then?
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libzstd [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.3+dfsg-2ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python-pylxd [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.0.7-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected proftpd-dfsg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.5a-1.1]
[16:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu7]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected neutron [source] (artful-proposed) [2:11.0.2-0ubuntu1.2]
[16:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu3.2]
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfs-linux [source] (artful-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1ubuntu3.2]
[18:40] <jbicha> slangasek: please add /i386 to the end of this changed line (so we don't ignore all LO/bionic autopkgtest results) https://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/britney/hints-ubuntu/revision/2900
[19:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted proftpd-dfsg [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.5a-1ubuntu0.1]
[19:46] <acheronuk> slangasek or infinity: could we maybe get an ack on this? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/plasma-framework/+bug/1754825
[19:46] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1754825 in plasma-framework (Ubuntu Bionic) "[FFe] KDE Frameworks 5.44.0 into the Bionic Archive" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[19:46] <tsimonq2> +1
[19:48] <infinity> acheronuk: ACKed in the bug.
[19:48] <acheronuk> infinity: superb. thanks you :)
[19:49] <acheronuk> *thank
[19:49] <estan> hi all. would it be possible for you folks to merge into artful c-blosc 1.14.0 from debian, once it hits unstable? i recently reported this to the debian maintainer and he was kind enough to quickly make a new package: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/c-blosc/merge_requests/1
[19:51] <estan> the problem with the 1.11.1 version that is currently in unstable is that it's one of the "bad apple" versions that accidently broke forward compatibility with all older versions of the library.
[19:52] <estan> (the upstream author has fixed it in 1.14.0, and also blogged about the incident here: http://blosc.org/posts/new-forward-compat-policy/)
[20:04] <estan> err, s/artful/bionic/
[20:16] <nacc> estan: have you filed  abug in ubuntu?
[20:22] <slangasek> xnox: thanks, LP: #1755184 done
[20:22] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1755184 in unity-scopes-api (Ubuntu) "RM: obsolete product" [High,Fix released] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1755184
[20:22] <slangasek> jbicha: hint adjusted; btw I'm puzzled by the libreoffice results against dconf, showing "ignored failure"s that didn't match any of the versioned hints
[20:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dh-runit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.7.1] (no packageset)
[20:36] <estan> nacc: ah no. i guess i should do that. i just wasn't sure if it'll automatically trickle out to ubuntu, now that i set it in motion in debian. but i guess i should file an ubuntu bug to hurry it along.
[20:40] <nacc> estan: we're after debian import freeze
[21:17] <tsimonq2> OK, so what is going on here? Lubuntu's images aren't picking up our ship-live-share seed when it
[21:17] <tsimonq2> *it's explicitly included in lp:ubuntu-cdimage.
[21:20] <tsimonq2> Er, OK, so it's pulling the seed in, but it isn't installing most of the packages that are in here...
[21:21] <tsimonq2> e.g. grepping the manifest doesn't return lvm2.
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Er, I'm dumb.
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Now to see if this bug is *actually* legitimate... >_<
[21:22] <tsimonq2> Thanks for the rubber ducky I guess
[21:25] <wxl> tsimonq2: which bug are you on about it again?
[21:26] <tsimonq2> wxl: LVM installs not working.
[21:26] <tsimonq2> If that works fine, my next thing is figuring out why in the heck encrypted LVM installs still try to assign unencrypted swap and then just error out...
[21:26] <foka> Hi tsimonq2!  This might be off-topic, but after installing LibreOffice on Lubuntu bionic i386 daily live image, lowriter does not start properly.  No such problem on Lbuntu amd64 bionic.  (I probably should file a bug, but I'll need to reproduce it first and get some more data, haha)  By the way, Lubuntu works great!  It is *lighting* fast!  Thank you for your great work!
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:27] <tsimonq2> foka: Let's move this to #lubuntu :)
[21:27] <tsimonq2> But thanks :D
[21:27] <foka> tsimonq2, Good idea!
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:36] <wxl> tsimonq2: interesting that the ubiquity issue seems to be something about lvm, even though adam calls it a red herring
[21:37] <tsimonq2> wxl: I'm working on something unrelated.
[21:37] <tsimonq2> Yeah, waaaaaaaat, LVM install fails...
[21:38] <infinity> wxl: It has nothing to do with lvm.
[21:38] <infinity> tsimonq2: lvm2 installs will indeed fail, but not related to the other issue.
[21:38] <infinity> (And easily solved)
[21:39] <tsimonq2> infinity: So, can ya give me a hint? ;)
[21:39] <tsimonq2> lvm2 is indeed installed
[21:40] <infinity> wxl: No it's not.
[21:40] <infinity> Err.
[21:40] <infinity> tsimonq2: No it's not. :P
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Err.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> What?
[21:40] <tsimonq2> infinity: So... why?
[21:40] <infinity> What makes you think it is?
[21:40] <infinity> ship-live != live.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> It's in the ISO pool.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Oh.
[21:40] <infinity> Having a deb in a pool isn't the same as having it installed.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Maybe that... yeah.
[21:40] <tsimonq2> Duh. :)
[21:41] <tsimonq2> I'll... do the thing.
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: prison-kf5 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[21:41] <infinity> That said, it should probably be in live-common if it's needed.
[21:41] <infinity> So, hold up on hacking around in your seeds.
[21:41] <tsimonq2> OK.
[21:41] <tsimonq2> (And why in the heck is the option even available if lvm2 isn't installed? lolwat)
[21:41] <infinity> It's possible that ubiquity should also depend on it instead of recommending, but happy to just seed it in common for now.
[21:42] <infinity> ubiquity probably should do a better job of hiding that option if lvm2 isn't there, *or* not making it optional.
[21:43] <infinity> Although, we already seed-instead-of-depend for xfsutils, jfsutils, etc, so I guess there's precedent here.
[21:44] <infinity> tsimonq2: Committed.  And you probably don't need it in ship-live.
[21:44] <tsimonq2> infinity: ACK.
[21:46] <tsimonq2> infinity: Oh yeah, and Ubiquity lolwats at encrypted LVM because "Unsafe swap detected" so it still wants to do a thing with swap when that option's selected. I don't know yet if it's Just A Lubuntu Thing or a global thing, but ideas on fixing it would be cool.
[22:08] <tsimonq2> Oh great, so it's just a Lubuntu thing.
[22:08] <tsimonq2> Fun.
[22:42] <tsimonq2> infinity: Oh, duh, the problem is that Lubuntu uses zram and Ubiquity thinks that it's a security risk (but it really ain't).
[22:42] <tsimonq2> Let me see if I can throw you a patch.
[22:55] <tsimonq2> Actually, it's partman-auto-crypto that seems to be doing the weird stuff.