[04:58] <kaushal> hi
[04:58] <kaushal> Any tasl/event application on Ubuntu 10.10 ?
[04:58] <kaushal> task*
[04:59] <kaushal> I am looking out for some sort of alert
[05:00] <kaushal> I saw osmo and tasque
[06:36] <kaushal> hi
[06:37] <kaushal> I am running tomboy notes on Ubuntu Linux 10.10, tomboy version --> 1.4.2-0ubuntu1, the reminder plugin does not work :/
[06:37] <kaushal> I dont see the alert line being highlighted in yellow or doesnot pop up
[06:37] <kaushal> Please suggest/guide


[08:28] <womanwholinuxlin> hi there husband get rly frustrat with me becos i no linix he cammunicat in linis on the computar and im like wat do
[08:28] <valorie> sigh
[08:30] <womanwholinuxlin> why u sigh 4 how i use the linux linux
[08:31] <valorie> and the Ilove nick as well.....
[08:31] <valorie> ah, good
[08:31] <valorie> sorry, was watching doctor who instead of paying proper attention
[08:32] <tigrmesh> hi
[08:32] <valorie> hey tigrmesh
[08:32] <valorie> thanks, IdleOne


[05:37] <alkisg> Unit193: it wouldn't hurt to have the same meta-packages for both debian and ubuntu; no reason to be different if noone in ubuntu is maintaining something different
[05:37] <alkisg> We're not using them in Greece because we're using greek-only education software instead, but I've heard of schools in other countries using those debian metapackages


[07:48] <criztovyl> Where do I find sources for UT packages? i.e. media-hub 4.2.0+15.04.20160704-0ubuntu1
[11:28] <Glokem> Greetings
[13:10] <ganeshi4u> hey guys I'm porting Ubuntu touch for my Samsung device and while building recovery image it gave a error during the build of libhealthd.qcom can i comment it out or is it necessary?
[14:19] <gb_mks> hello, I´m trying to follow this Ubuntu Touch course for developers: https://www.gitbook.com/book/mimecar/curso-de-programacion-de-ubuntu-phone-touch/details
[14:19] <gb_mks> but I found a problem with the ubuntu-sdk creating projects.
[14:19] <gb_mks> Once installed the ubuntu-sdk and created the armfh kit, I try to create a new app but I find this message in the kit selecction menu from the wirard: "No valid kits found". If I go to Tools -> Options -> Build&Run -> Kits in the armfh kit there is a warning symbol that states: "Mkspec " not found for the Qt version".
[14:19] <gb_mks> Do someone have any clue for solving it? Thanks :)
[15:08] <pleia2> sp. O having some trouble with my bq Aquaris M10, it's stuck in a state of not booting ...just flashing the "powered by Ubuntu" screen every few seconds, any thoughts?
[15:08] <pleia2> bah
[15:08] <pleia2> s/sp. O/so, I'm
[15:15] <pleia2> can't even seem to turn it off :\ it's just staying in this loop
[15:17] <mimecar> pleia2, can you power off by holding poweb, volume up and volume down buttons?
[15:17] <pleia2> mimecar: I tried, it's stops it for longer than usual, but then starts right back up again
[15:18] <mimecar> have you a Windows computer?
[15:18] <pleia2> no
[15:18] <mimecar> M10 use Mediatek, you can try to reflash the firmware
[15:18] <pleia2> what's Mediatek?
[15:19] <mimecar> the soc builder
[15:19] <mimecar> can you enter on recovery?
[15:19] <pleia2> how?
[15:19] <mimecar> press volume up on reboot
[15:20] <pleia2> doesn't seem to do anything
[15:22] <pleia2> this is really bad timing, I fly across the country tonight and have an ubuntu presentation to give Monday x_x
[15:22] <pleia2> behold, broken tablet!
[15:23] <mimecar> You'll have to let the battery drain
[15:23] <pleia2> ok
[15:23] <pleia2> it's been doing this all night, I was hoping it would be drained by now, alas
[15:24] <pleia2> then plug it back in, and try to boot it into recovery?
[15:24] <mimecar> yes
[15:24] <pleia2> are there recovery instructions somewhere?
[15:27] <mimecar> on M10 FHD (the same model with other screen)
[15:27] <mimecar> you have two options: wipe cache partition and factorty reset
[15:28] <mimecar> you must run first wipe cache... and reboot
[15:28] <pleia2> I don't need anything on this, so it's fine to factory reset
[15:28] <mimecar> ok
[15:28] <mimecar> then you can test the second option
[15:33] <pleia2> so, http://www.mibqyyo.com/comunidad/discussion/75754/reset-my-tablet/p1 is leading me to http://www.mibqyyo.com/en-articles/2015/09/16/ubuntu-android-installation-process-for-bq-aquaris-e4-5-and-e5/#/vanilla/discussion/embed/?vanilla_discussion_id=0 - are these the correct instructions?
[15:35] <mimecar> yes, the Hard Reset process is the same for phones and tablet on bq
[15:36] <mimecar> that option would be the last option if factory reset does not work
[15:36] <pleia2> oh, I thought that was the same thing, do you know the process for factory reset?
[15:38] <mimecar> on windows yes but it should be similar on linux
[15:38] <pleia2> I don't have Windows
[15:38] <pleia2> can you point me to some documentation or something for it?
[15:39] <mimecar> I have not checked the process on linux
[15:39] <mimecar> but it looks similar with spflash tool
[15:39] <mimecar> you have the documentation on previous link you pasted
[15:39] <pleia2> oh, ok, I thought you said that was something different x_x
[15:39] <pleia2> so a hard reset and a factory reset are the same, or not?
[15:40] <mimecar> no
[15:40] <mimecar> on factory reset you remove user data partition
[15:40] <mimecar> on hard reset you reinstall the OS
[15:41] <pleia2> ok, the link I have doesn't even mention factory reset
[15:41] <Sander^home> Hi. Do anyone know if it would be possible to run firejail on ubuntu phone?
[15:41] <Sander^home> It looks to be pretty leightweigt.
[15:46] <mimecar> pleia2, you can ask later if you have some problem with HR process
[15:46] <pleia2> mimecar: thanks, getting on a flight soon so hopefully the battery will die some time this morning
[16:11] <javier4_> mtk patched kernel here: on aosp it builds correctly, on Ubuntu it gives this error
[16:11] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/kernel/sched/rt.c: In function 'sched_rt_runtime_exceeded':
[16:12] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/kernel/sched/rt.c:1084:25: error: 'struct rt_rq' has no member named 'rq'
[16:12] <javier4_>    int cpu = rq_cpu(rt_rq->rq);
[16:12] <javier4_>                          ^
[16:12] <javier4_> make[4]: *** [kernel/sched/rt.o] Error 1
[16:25] <kaisoz> hi there!
[16:27] <mimecar> hi kaisoz
[16:28] <kaisoz> hi mimecar
[16:36] <dobey> why is getting qml to lay things out properly so bloody difficult
[17:27] <ganeshi4u> javier4_: I am porting Ubuntu touch for my Samsung device to and led to the same error. Just simply remove this "CONFIG_USER_NS" from your kernel defconfig and it should build fine
[18:07] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, thanks man, but it seems to not be sufficient. My build still fails the same way. Are you sure that's the only *_NS config did you unset?
[18:13] <ganeshi4u> yes removing that made my kernel build without any errors, also try removing this one by one and see which one  the error.. CONFIG_PID_NS,CONFIG_NET_NS,CONFIG_UTS_NS,CONFIG_IPC_NS
[18:14] <smiley_face> hi I have a problem with my nexus 7 2012 it gives me this error
[18:15] <smiley_face> ERROR:phablet-flash:Unsupported device, autodetect fails device
[18:15] <ganeshi4u> javier4_ where did you you get the kernel source from and are you sure it built fine without the Ubuntu touch extra defconfig additions?
[18:16] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, I found it on the net, it's customized by mediatek, and I've already been able to build a full aosp rom on it.
[18:19] <ganeshi4u> hmm..javier4_ then it seems to be the Ubuntu touch defconfig additions that broke something. Try to build by removing those configs that i have mentioned in the previous message
[18:25] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, still fails.
[18:32] <ganeshi4u> javier4_: I think this maybe a compiler issue too,currently I'm facing errors to and this seems to be due to a faulty compiler. Try to replace the compiler maybe with a linaro toolchain
[18:32] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, I'm obliged to use a mediatek-customized compiler.
[18:35] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, the compiler I use it's the same I used to build aosp, so I don't think it can be the issue.
[18:39] <ganeshi4u> javier4_ building for mediatek devices is really hard, by the way what's your device? I'll try to look out for your error and let you know if i find something
[18:41] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, I'm trying a porting for a new device. Elephone vowney lite. If i'll find a way I'll let you know. Thanks.
[18:54] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, I gave a look to the problematic source file and found a way to make it build: enable CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED. I don't know if this can cause problem to Ubuntu builds, but I fear it does. Actually I have another problem now:
[18:55] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/kernel/cgroup.c: In function 'subsys_cgroup_allow_attach':
[18:55] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/kernel/cgroup.c:2138:37: error: invalid operands to binary != (have 'kuid_t' and 'kuid_t')
[18:55] <javier4_>    if (current != task && cred->euid != tcred->uid &&
[18:55] <javier4_>                                      ^
[18:55] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/kernel/cgroup.c:2139:18: error: invalid operands to binary != (have 'kuid_t' and 'kuid_t')
[18:55] <javier4_>        cred->euid != tcred->suid)
[18:55] <javier4_>                   ^
[18:55] <javier4_> make[3]: *** [kernel/cgroup.o] Error 1
[18:55] <javier4_> make[2]: *** [kernel] Error 2
[18:55] <javier4_> I have to go now. I hope I'll find you here again tomorrow.
[18:57] <ganeshi4u> as far as i know the invalid operands to binary error is related to the CONFIG_USER_NS. By disabling that config i have came past that error
[18:58] <ganeshi4u> javier4_: is the CONFIG_USER _NS still enabled!! if it is still there try to build by removing it
[18:59] <javier4_> LOL. We're totally reverting all the Ubuntu defconfig customization. I think this will have give us problem for sure building system/. I'll try anyway.
[19:03] <ganeshi4u> nope CONFIG_USER_NS is just a experimental work as I have searched for it over the internet and didn't seem to be that important, and I have also gone through the defconfig of devices which have been already built Ubuntu touch and the *_NS was disabled in them too
[19:20] <javier4_> ganeshi4u, my kernel seems to be building fine. Surely my complete rom build will fail for other problems I already I'm aware of. But you can try the flag I suggested. It seems to work.
[19:23] <javier4_> I talked to early:
[19:23] <javier4_> drivers/built-in.o: In function `vgacon_switch':
[19:23] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:819: undefined reference to `screen_info'
[19:23] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:819: undefined reference to `screen_info'
[19:23] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:839: undefined reference to `screen_info'
[19:23] <javier4_> drivers/built-in.o: In function `vgacon_init':
[19:23] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:588: undefined reference to `screen_info'
[19:23] <javier4_> /home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:588: undefined reference to `screen_info'
[19:23] <javier4_> drivers/built-in.o:/home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10/drivers/video/console/vgacon.c:374: more undefined references to `screen_info' follow
[19:23] <javier4_> make[2]: *** [vmlinux] Error 1
[19:23] <javier4_> make[1]: *** [sub-make] Error 2
[19:23] <javier4_> make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/Ubuntu/javier/dati/UbuTouch/phablet5/kernel-3.10'
[19:23] <javier4_> make: *** [TARGET_KERNEL_BINARIES] Error 2


[16:50] <dinda> jjesse: ping
[16:51] <jjesse> pong
[18:01] <LaserJock> hi all, is there somebody or sub-team working on UNE docs?
[20:20] <LaserJock> anybody about?
[20:21] <nixternal> what's up LaserJock
[20:21] <nixternal> oh, UNE stuff...I heard it brought up a few times, but haven't seen anything yet on it
[20:22] <LaserJock> ok, I started https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuNetbookEdition
[20:22] <LaserJock> I just didn't want to step on any toes or duplicate already planned out work
[20:30] <nixternal> unless
[20:31] <nixternal> err, unless Canonical is doing something for it, but I don't think anything has been done
[20:31] <LaserJock> no, I talked to who I think is the lead on UNE and he said nothing was being done
[20:32] <LaserJock> so I guess that means it's wide open
[20:32] <LaserJock> hmm, did I just paint myself into a corner? :-)