[00:58] <blut> hello
[00:58] <blut> i cant join #ubuntu
[00:58] <blut> it says im banned, but i have no idea why
[00:58] <blut> any ideas
[00:58] <blut> ?
[01:03] <blut> btw just to make sure you dont missunderstand this
[01:03] <blut> i have never been in the channel before
[01:03] <blut> !
[01:04] <blut> is there anybody out there?
[01:07] <blut> ...
[06:20] <q0k> Why do I receive the message "#ubuntu-ru  Cannot send to channel"?
[06:22] <Myrtti> !register
[06:24] <Myrtti> probabilities are they are blocking messages from unregistered, unidentified users
[07:23] <SpaceGhostC2C> I have a question. I want to make a reference to a movie, because it's a funny movie that would be perfect for a sex education class. It has a questionable title.
[07:23] <SpaceGhostC2C> I can't use the grandma rule, because she showed it to me.
[07:24] <SpaceGhostC2C> Would it help to say the title here?
[07:25] <SpaceGhostC2C> !patience
[07:25] <SpaceGhostC2C> Sorry, had to remind myself.
[07:27] <mneptok> SpaceGhostC2C: in what channel?
[07:28] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, none yet.
[07:28] <SpaceGhostC2C> By the way, you look hot in your picture that ubottu has :p
[07:30] <mneptok> SpaceGhostC2C: so you want to mention something, but you have no idea where you're thinking about mentioning it?
[07:31] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, oh.  It shows a awkward side of four relationships in five stages.
[07:34] <mneptok> not suitable.
[07:34] <SpaceGhostC2C> Not really pornographic, but it is humorous.
[07:34] <SpaceGhostC2C> There is also a interesting couple twists.
[07:34] <SpaceGhostC2C> Mmk.
[07:34] <mneptok> "if my 8 year old child was using the channel, would i want ...."
[07:35] <SpaceGhostC2C> Most interesting part is when the player falls in love with a girl and means all the usual lines, like "I love you more than anything." He means it that time, and she plays him because she just wants a one night stand. Total karma balance.
[07:35] <mneptok> and thanks for asking first. your spider-senses are working.
[07:35] <dholbach> good morning
[07:36] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, Umm, I'll try "Would I feel embarassed if my daughter knew I said this." It's more convicting.
[07:36] <mneptok> dholbach: moin.
[07:38] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, I'm afraid to ask in the channel, but what is #ubuntu-women for?
[07:38] <jussi01> SpaceGhostC2C: you just did ask...
[07:39] <SpaceGhostC2C> I'm not for or against it existing, but their guidelines seem to say it's just made by women, for women.
[07:39] <SpaceGhostC2C> jussi01, the reason I didn't say it in full was because I was trying to be really sensitive.
[07:40] <SpaceGhostC2C> jussi01, a lot of offtopic people say they got banned and I understand why, so I didn't want to get banned from the channel when all I wanted was to inquire to the purpose and functions of the channel, if there are any.
[07:40] <SpaceGhostC2C> It can be taken very umm, wrongly from the way I intend it.
[07:40] <mneptok> SpaceGhostC2C: it's a place for women that are interested in, develop, or use Ubuntu to congregate. they also welcome men that are supportive of such efforts.
[07:40] <jussi01> SpaceGhostC2C: like it says on the wiki page you were referred to: Ubuntu-Women is a team functioning under Ubuntu to provide a platform and encouragement for women to contribute to Ubuntu-Linux, a Debian based free and open-source GNU/Linux software. Our main role will be along the lines of supplementing and being the stepping stone toward the larger Ubuntu-Linux world. Membership is open to all.
[07:41] <SpaceGhostC2C> My thoughts was that it was more of a tool of sorts to connect the women of ubuntu. would that be right?
[07:41] <SpaceGhostC2C> And any other members of the channel.
[07:41] <SpaceGhostC2C> Whether developers or end users, whoever.
[07:42] <jussi01> SpaceGhostC2C: this page really does answer your question: http://women.ubuntu.com/
[07:42] <mneptok> it does that, and also has other functions. like ensuring the project is welcoming to women and gives them a pleasant environment.
[07:42] <SpaceGhostC2C> Can we get a channel for red heads? There's only 1% of us left in the world. Actually a little less.
[07:43] <mneptok> SpaceGhostC2C: do you expect a serious answer to that?
[07:43] <tsimpson> hypothetical discussions have no answers
[07:43] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, nope. No one likes red heads anyways. Red-headed step children will never find their place in this world, except by anonymity.
[07:44] <SpaceGhostC2C> Anyways, thanks. Glad I missed a bad decision about the movie.
[07:44] <Bacta> Hello
[07:45] <Bacta> I was banned from #ubuntu+1 for out of channel activities
[07:45] <Bacta> Is this legitimate?
[07:45] <ikonia> you're not banned
[07:45] <ikonia> you're just muted
[07:45] <Bacta> I wasn't aware that ops could ban/quiet people based on their own feelings towards the individual
[07:45] <Bacta> Well you banned me the other night
[07:45] <ikonia> yes, based on a warning you made to me to watch your behaviour in other channels
[07:45] <ikonia> I felt that harsh so changed it to a mute
[07:46] <ikonia> that way you can follow what's going on but not make silly comments
[07:46] <Bacta> I'm sorry but there's nothing in channel policy to allow you to do this
[07:46] <ikonia> there is nothing that says I can't
[07:46] <Bacta> Your feelings towards me are your own and have no place when it comes to banning
[07:46] <ikonia> I used judgment based on your long term behaviour and your current behaviour as you had just been banned
[07:46] <Bacta> What did I do in #ubuntu+1 to warrant a ban?
[07:47] <mneptok> ikonia: yes, there is. precedent. i was chastised for banning a user in one channel based on actions in another.
[07:47] <ikonia> mneptok: I'm aware of that, and I've informed the council of this
[07:47] <ikonia> they are aware of my actions and my reasonsing
[07:47] <mneptok> OK, then their thoughts certainly outweigh mine.
[07:47] <Bacta> I'm not here to do your job but I would think that you wouldn't be allowed to ban based on your own feelings/whim
[07:47] <ikonia> mneptok: they don't,
[07:48] <ikonia> it's not feelings or a whim
[07:48] <Bacta> What did I do in #ubuntu+1 to warrant a ban?
[07:48] <Bacta> I'm interested in knowing
[07:48] <mneptok> ikonia: they should. i'm just one person. the Council represents the community.
[07:48] <ikonia> Bacta: one moment please
[07:48] <ikonia> SpaceGhostC2C: can we help ?
[07:48] <Bacta> Would you like me to pull out the logs?
[07:48] <ikonia> Bacta: just one moment please
[07:48] <mneptok> Bacta: +1 is officially logged
[07:48] <SpaceGhostC2C> Just wondering about something I brought up earlier. If the channel is rather slow in #ubuntu, would it possibly be okay to ask if anyone needs help?
[07:49] <ikonia> SpaceGhostC2C: you where told the answer to that - no
[07:49] <Bacta> mneptok: Yep, I'm just sifting through them now
[07:49] <SpaceGhostC2C> mneptok, what are your thoughts? It's rather slow un #ubuntu.
[07:49] <ikonia> SpaceGhostC2C: you where told the answer by 3 seperate people
[07:49] <tsimpson> SpaceGhostC2C: if someone wants help, they'll ask a question
[07:49] <ikonia> SpaceGhostC2C:please stop trying to canvas more people
[07:50] <ikonia> Bacta: apologies, be with you ASAP
[07:50] <SpaceGhostC2C> ikonia, I prefaced with saying that I've asked previously. No need to get somewhat personally involved. If you want to say that I've asked before, say it without being offensive.
[07:51] <SpaceGhostC2C> I'll just drop waiting in #ubuntu. Thanks.
[07:51] <Bacta> mneptok: The logs don't seem to carry op actions http://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2010/02/14/%23ubuntu+1.html
[07:51] <ikonia> SpaceGhostC2C: I wasn't being offensive, I'm stating a fact, you've asked before, and been told by 3 occasions
[07:51] <SpaceGhostC2C> yup. Whatever.
[07:51] <ikonia> Bacta: apologies, I'll explain my reasons to you now
[07:51] <Bacta> I don't want your apologies
[07:52] <Bacta> I want to know why I was banned in an official Ubuntu IRC channel for something that occurred in a non-affiliated channel
[07:52] <ikonia> Bacta: 1.) you had just been banned in #ubuntu for trolling 2.) you are not using lucid so not sure what you needed+1 3.) you have a LONG history of being trouble in every channel you're in 4.) you've made comments that your only reason for being in #ubuntu-women is to upset members 5.) you made a comment to me in a pm that I needed to watch your behaviour in other channels
[07:53] <ikonia> based on that situation (mostly because you'd just been banned 30 seconds before joining +1) I chose to stop any futher actions from you, on speaking with others and more thought, it seemed harsh, so I changed it to a mute
[07:53] <Bacta> I have never said I was in #ubuntu-women to upset
[07:53] <ikonia> that way you can see what's going on, but not cause an issue
[07:53] <Bacta> And I do use lucid
[07:53] <ikonia> on the day you where banned you where not using lucid
[07:54] <ikonia> hence why I changed it to a mute
[07:54] <ikonia> so you could see what was going on and we could get more confidence that you could behave
[07:54] <ikonia> you have a long long history of ill behaviour and channel disruption,
[07:54] <Bacta> I'm sorry but where does it say in the channel topic that you MUST be using Lucid to be in the channel?
[07:54] <Bacta> I think that's a bit of a cop out personally
[07:55] <ikonia> Bacta: it doesn't but as it's lucid discussion and you where not using it, just joined 30 seconds after being banned from ubuntu and warned me to watch your behaviour, that's why I took the decision
[07:55] <ikonia> so if you're not using lucid.....warning me to watch your behaviour straight after being banned, and your past history, does it not seem like you "may" be in that channel just to cause an issue
[07:56] <Bacta> Do you want me to paste the logs of what was said in PM?
[07:56] <ikonia> it's an unusual action to take but you are an unusually persistant problem user
[07:56] <ikonia> you're welcome to paste what ever you want
[07:56] <Bacta> Do you want me to post the logs of my entering and my banning along with the timestamps?
[07:56] <ikonia> the logs are public
[07:56] <ikonia> I don't doubt you said nothing in the channel
[07:56] <ikonia> I'm not disputing that at all
[07:56] <ikonia> I'm just explaining my rational
[07:57] <Bacta> Why did this happen immediately after some of the users in #club-ubuntu told you off for saying I "don't belong anywhere"?
[07:57] <Bacta> Immediately after
[07:57] <ikonia> Bacta: no it didn't
[07:57] <Bacta> Coincidence?
[07:57] <Bacta> Don't make me get those logs as well
[07:57] <ikonia> it happened as soon as I noticed you'd just joined
[07:57] <Bacta> No it didn't ikonia
[07:58] <Bacta> And I would like to discuss this issue with somebody else
[07:58] <ikonia> I can't argue that becuase I wasn't aware that you where watching what I noticed when I noticed
[07:58] <Bacta> As I feel you cannot present an objective opinion in this matter
[07:58] <ikonia> I'll leave you to discuss it with anyone you feel appropriate to
[07:59] <Mamarok> Bacta: while you are here, what is the reason for your presence in #ubuntu-women?
[08:00] <Bacta> Because we build Ubuntu based computers for charity some weekends, many goto women
[08:00] <Mamarok> hm, what does that have to do with #ubuntu-women?
[08:01] <Bacta> As I said, many goto women
[08:01] <Mamarok> that is a very strange reason, sorry
[08:01] <Bacta> I wasn't aware there was a policy preventing men from being there
[08:01] <Bacta> But if there is I'll part
[08:01] <Mamarok> how is this related to the ubuntu-women project
[08:01] <Mamarok> ?
[08:01] <mneptok> Bacta: there is no such policy. but there's also no policy against asking about your rationale.
[08:02] <Mamarok> there is no policy preventing men to be there, but the men who are regulars in that channel have a valid reason to be there
[08:02] <Mamarok> so I am really curious about your precise reason, and the one give above has no relation to that project IMHO
[08:02] <Bacta> I wasn't aware of there being an actual "project", I just thought it was a place to discuss female issues when it comes to using Ubuntu and Linux in general
[08:03] <Bacta> And I'm a huge supporter of women getting into technology
[08:03] <Mamarok> hm, and you are discussing "female issues"?
[08:03] <Bacta> If there's an interesting conversation I would often join in
[08:03] <Mamarok> so far you do smalltalk there
[08:04] <Bacta> If somebody raised the topic of getting more women into CS I would offer my opinions on how to make it happen
[08:04] <Bacta> But often the conversation is centred around "good mornings" and "how are yous"
[08:04] <Bacta> I can't help that
[08:04] <mneptok> Bacta: out of curiosity, what group is this that builds computers for donation?
[08:05] <Bacta> It's just a thing at a church down the road, we also build Windows boxes
[08:05] <Bacta> There isn't a website if that's what you're asking but I'm hoping to change that :)
[08:05] <Mamarok> Bacta: there is very often other discussions, but besides lingering and doing smaltalk I haven't seen you being involed constructively
[08:05] <Bacta> Mamarok: I think it might have something to do with the times I'm on IRC
[08:06] <mneptok> Bacta: one man's opinion here, but "ircname  : FuggaNikah" isn't anything i would want representing my project nor my religious organization.
[08:06] <Mamarok> not really, since you were always in there when I was and there were quite a few discussions going on
[08:06] <tsimpson> sorry to interrupt, but I don't see any relevance in this conversation to the quiet in +1
[08:06] <Bacta> They're often related towards the Ubuntu development community which I have yet to make any significant contribution to
[08:06] <Bacta> Yeah, I'm interested in working that out too tsimpson
[08:07] <Mamarok> tsimpson: I didn't say it was related, I asked a question out of curiosity
[08:07] <tsimpson> Mamarok: ok
[08:08] <tsimpson> Bacta: seeing as you don't want to discuss this with ikonia, you should follow the rest of the appeals process https://wiki.ubuntu.com/IRC/AppealProcess
[08:10] <Bacta> tsimpson: I would like to however would this be a transparent process?
[08:10] <tsimpson> transparent in what way?
[08:11] <Bacta> Well I feel that certain individuals would try and frame this in the context of my previous actions and not in regards to the channel it occurred in and whether the op breached policy
[08:13] <tsimpson> the appeals process allows you to get a point where none of the IRC ops make the decision, if you are unsatisfied with the decision in a previous step
[08:14] <Bacta> I would certainly be happy with either yourself, Mamarok or mneptok looking into this, I've not had any dealings with any of you before and I feel you might be able to look at this matter objectively
[08:14] <Bacta> I just feel that the op who issued the ban did so out of his own personal feelings towards me
[08:15] <Mamarok> Bacta: I am not in those channels, so I don't know much about, don't count on me, sorry
[08:15] <Bacta> That's my primary concern about the appeals process
[08:16] <tsimpson> I'd like to stay out if this stage as far as possible, in case it escalates
[08:16] <Mamarok> Bacta: but, as a frinedly suggestion: your behavior should reflect your commitment to the Ubuntu policies in all channels you are in, regardless the channel
[08:16] <Mamarok> friendly*
[08:16] <Bacta> Mamarok: True, but I'm looking at this from a policy point of view
[08:17] <Bacta> Anyway, what I will do is get these logs together including what went on in #club-ubuntu and I'll send them<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[08:17] <Bacta> *to
[08:18] <Bacta> Thanks for your help :)
[08:19] <bazhang> club has nothing to do with anything Ubuntu related.
[08:19] <ikonia> it does when he believes I banned him because I was getting attacked in ##club
[08:19] <ikonia> in reality it doesn't, but in his head it does
[09:04] <Myrtti> i hate the discussion in -ot for some reason
[09:07] <topyli> .\
[10:05] <bazhang> Jordan_U, hi
[10:06] <Jordan_U> bazhang, Hi, "ubuntu" in #ubuntu is trolling intermittently
[10:07] <bazhang> Jordan_U, okay, thanks for the heads-up, will check him/her/it out
[10:07] <Jordan_U> bazhang, np
[10:08] <Myrtti> hasn't  said anything in a long while
[10:09] <bazhang> yep, apart from asking ubottu for marriage
[10:21]  * mneptok warned him/her already
[10:21] <mneptok> and now, bedtime
[10:21] <bazhang> nightie night
[14:33] <nerdy_kid> hello, hamnegga is giving malicious advice in #ubuntu
[14:34] <ikonia> lets have a look
[14:34] <nerdy_kid> at 9:28:47
[14:35] <ikonia> nerdy_kid: I can see him telling you to restart the x server, what was your actual question as I can't work that out
[14:35] <nerdy_kid> ikonia the question was what the purpose of the bs flag in the dd command
[14:36] <ikonia> nerdy_kid: I'll speak to him about it, I can see the conversaton properly now
[14:36] <nerdy_kid> ikonia thanks have a good day :)
[14:36] <ikonia> no problem
[14:36] <ikonia> thank you
[14:51] <ikonia> hamneggs not responding,
[14:55] <ikonia> ughhh autobleh's forard doesn't work
[14:55] <ikonia> oh yes it does
[14:55] <ikonia> phew
[15:08] <ikonia> hi hamnegga
[15:08] <ikonia> bye then
[15:12] <ikonia> spoke in pm, ban forward removed, it was an accident he was trying to answer a different question and got muddled up
[15:18]  * genii makes a fresh pot of coffee (non-decaf)
[15:29] <Myrtti> great, now he's suggesting mint
[15:30] <ikonia> who ?
[15:30] <ikonia> oh hamneggs again
[15:36] <blphgr> helau evribodi
[15:36] <ikonia> blphgr: please be polite to users in #ubuntu, help them do not use offensive language
[15:37] <ikonia> blphgr: if you can't help them - don't speak, but don't make silly suggestions to them
[15:37] <blphgr> alright, I will. Now let me in.
[15:37] <ikonia> please re-join #ubuntu
[15:37] <blphgr> thanks douchebag
[15:37] <ikonia> ok - you're staying banned now
[15:37] <blphgr> I was just kidding dude
[15:38] <ikonia> it's not funny
[15:38] <blphgr> surely it isn't mate
[15:38] <ikonia> I gave you warnings in the channel, and removed you from the channel beause of your attitude, I've just removed a ban and you thank me with an insult
[15:38] <ikonia> so take some time away from the channel and think about how you behave in the ubuntu channels
[15:39] <blphgr> I will behave
[15:39] <ikonia> blphgr: please come back in 24 hours
[15:39] <ikonia> blphgr: you need to take some time out to think about how you interact with people in the ubuntu channels, your last comment was totally uncalled for
[15:40] <blphgr> I see, you know, I'm a bad boy but I'm trying to be calm now
[15:40] <ikonia> ok, well, come back in 24 hours and we'll discuss your ban then
[15:40] <bazhang> perhaps read the coc and guidelines
[15:41] <blphgr> I just did, not finished yet tho
[15:41] <ikonia> where are you reading them from ?
[15:41] <blphgr> the internet. Do you want me to explain to you what the internet is?
[15:41] <ikonia> blphgr: no, but your sarcasm isn't helping
[15:42] <ikonia> if you show me the link you're using we can see if it's the right one
[15:42] <blphgr> and what if I don't?
[15:42] <ikonia> nothing
[15:42] <ikonia> we'll speak to you in 24 hours
[15:42] <ikonia> please leave the channel and come back then
[15:43] <blphgr> come on, but showing a single link to you seems like nonsense to me
[15:43] <ikonia> then don't do it, we'll speak to you in 24 hours
[15:43] <ikonia> please come back in 24 hours
[15:44] <blphgr> alright, and what if I just swap over to another ubuntu channel=
[15:44] <blphgr> ?
[15:44] <ikonia> if you behave in them and stay on topic, no problem
[15:44] <blphgr> alright, so'll do that I guess
[15:45] <ikonia> ok, bye
[15:45] <blphgr> see you in a minute, gotta leave a shit
[15:45] <ikonia> please leave the channel
[15:45] <blphgr> which one?
[15:45] <ikonia> this one
[15:46] <blphgr> I can't, you told me to join
[15:46] <bazhang> uh
[15:46] <Myrtti> that was obviously going nowhere
[15:46] <ikonia> agreed
[15:49] <Tm_T> oh, he picked #k (:
[15:57] <bazhang> quelle surprise
[15:57] <ikonia> shock horror
[15:57] <ikonia> obvious that was coming
[17:15] <Pici> Myrtti: What do you think we should do about alabd?
[17:20] <Myrtti> smack im
[17:23] <ikonia> he's asking in #debian now
[17:23] <ikonia> is this really his home work ?
[17:24] <Pici> He claims he needs it for a book, whatever that means.
[17:24] <Myrtti> he's been apparently crossposting to #linux
[17:24] <ikonia> ha ha ha
[17:24] <ikonia> not the best research for a book
[17:24] <ikonia> he's just been handed his bottom in linux
[17:24] <ikonia> yes, I saw that
[17:34] <Pici> !ping
[17:34] <Pici> augh
[17:35] <Myrtti> oh lord
[17:35] <ikonia> wake up stupid bot
[17:35] <Pici> ikonia: ubottu already did it
[17:35] <Myrtti> i'll smack someone soon
[17:35] <genii> alabd?
[17:35] <ikonia> no more warnings
[17:38] <ikonia> explained why he was kicked in pm
[17:42] <Myrtti> :-D small victory
[17:42] <ikonia> hola
[17:46] <Myrtti> *sigh*
[17:47] <Myrtti> someone else smack Rokkenrolliolli, i've helped him before and he's finnish and my typing is awful with this n800
[17:49] <Tm_T> Myrtti: I try something
[17:52] <Tm_T> Myrtti: aand I give up, have no time nor patience to deal with him
[18:03] <Myrtti> grnaah
[18:05] <Myrtti> this stupidity and trolling hurtts my head
[18:06] <Myrtti> Tm_T: mind pm'ing me log?
[18:06] <Tm_T> Myrtti: there's no much log to share, just that "I said I have polarbear as a pet, and then the other dude lied about the dragon"
[18:07] <Tm_T> I gave up immediately after that
[18:07] <Myrtti> right
[18:07]  * Pici puts on his mean hat
[18:07] <Tm_T> meaty beaty big and bouncy
[20:01] <Trek> is there a factoid within ubottu that talks about questionably legal things?
[20:05] <Myrtti> !piracy
[20:05] <Trek> and this covers the "hacking" thing as well?
[20:05] <Myrtti> !search illegal
[20:06] <Myrtti> !illegal
[20:06] <Trek> cool.  thanks.
[20:06] <Myrtti> pretty much, I guess
[20:56] <Pici> Jack_Smirnoff: ♫
[20:56] <Pici> er, \o
[20:56] <ikonia> the sparrow
[20:56] <Jack_Smirnoff> Long time no see
[20:56] <ikonia> indeed, hi Jack_Smirnoff
[20:56] <Jack_Smirnoff> I happen to be at my old neighbors so I thought I would drop in
[20:56] <Jack_Smirnoff> Hope everyone is well
[20:57] <jrib> woah, jack is alive
[20:58] <Jack_Smirnoff> Still hanging in there
[20:58] <Pici> Good to see you here again
[20:58] <Jack_Smirnoff> Thanks.  been busy with some old friends working on a few projects
[21:03] <Jack_Smirnoff> Take care guys, I am off to help my neighbor move to a newer hard drive.
[21:03] <ikonia> wow, ok
[21:03] <ikonia> take care Jack_Smirnoff
[21:04] <Jack_Smirnoff> You too.
[21:31] <Myrtti> [23:30] < l11II1III1> Hullo evaryone. I'm here to trol you with with wierd unicode.
[21:31] <Myrtti> brilliant ...
[21:32] <genii> ompaul isn't helping much
[21:36] <ikonia> did spaceghost just call someone a complete moron /
[21:37] <gnomefreak> someone did in -ot but without looking i cant say who
[21:38] <topyli> yep, which is interesting while he is so worried about others' behavior
[21:39] <ikonia> someone (not me) needs to speak to him
[21:39] <ikonia> I'm tired of his attitude and calling people morons isn't in line with his telling of people to stop being offensive
[21:39] <ikonia> be warned if you speak to him he accuses you of insulting him
[21:40] <ikonia> maybe next time is not acceptable
[21:40] <Myrtti> comparative moralics
[21:40] <Myrtti> how intresting
[21:41] <ikonia> not acceptable
[21:44] <ikonia> telling someone to not use the bot (fair enough) but he uses it to greet everyone in #ubuntu
[21:44] <Myrtti> raaaarrrgggghhh
[21:44] <ikonia> getting tired now - he either gets with it or he's gone
[21:47] <ikonia> topyli: apologies, but I'm tired of it now
[21:47] <ikonia> it's not a game
[21:47] <topyli> feel free to remove, talking is not working. i've tried in pm, on channel, and i'd drag him to a pub and slap him across the face but i can't
[21:48] <ikonia> it's done now, he's understood
[21:53] <gnomefreak> why is it i dont think its done
[21:54] <ikonia> it is
[21:54] <gnomefreak> for now?
[21:55] <ikonia> certainly
[22:27] <Myrtti> bah, typos


[04:30] <wxl> sgclark: i forgot we talked about doing a UOS session. are we planning on an hour?
[05:03] <wxl> so why does virt need root?
[05:03] <wxl> oops wrong channel but feel free to answer if you want :)
[19:12] <sgclark> wxl: I need to know what day/time for the UOS