[02:02] <RAOF> Wow. gnome-shell is really leaky on disco on (at least) the nvidia drivers at the moment.
[02:02] <RAOF> Also really slow :(
[07:07] <oSoMoN> good morning desktoppers
[07:10] <didrocks> good morning
[07:10] <oSoMoN> salut didrocks
[07:10] <didrocks> salut oSoMoN
[08:29] <jibel> Bonjour tout le monde
[08:29] <didrocks> salut jibel, ça va ? Besoin d'aide pour l'iso testing ?
[08:30] <jibel> didrocks, ça va.
[08:31] <jibel> didrocks, I need tests on real hardware with nvidia or i915
[08:31] <jibel> didrocks, and uefi + sb
[08:31] <jibel> with nvidia
[08:31] <jibel> I covered other tests on vms
[08:33] <didrocks> hum, I can a live session on nvidia, but I don't have partitionned for my main machine to have dual install
[08:35] <jibel> didrocks, okay, so don't waste your time on this. I need a real installation to verify that the drivers are enabled after installation
[08:37] <didrocks> oki, that's what I guessed
[08:42] <seb128> good morning desktopers
[08:43] <Wimpress> o/
[08:44] <didrocks> hey Wimpress, re seb128
[08:44] <seb128> re didrocks :)
[08:44] <seb128> hey Wimpress jibel
[08:45] <oSoMoN> salut seb128
[08:45] <seb128> lut oSoMoN, en forme ?
[08:45] <oSoMoN> salut jibel, hey Wimpress
[08:46] <oSoMoN> la forme oui, pas beaucoup dormi mais ici il fait un temps de printemps et ça donne de l’énergie
[08:46] <oSoMoN> et toi?
[08:57] <seb128> ça va, un peu fatigué aussi mais j'ai bien profité du w.e :)
[09:02] <Laney> hark
[09:03] <seb128> hey Laney, how are you?
[09:03] <Laney> hey seb128
[09:04] <Laney> I'm alright thx, seems like a nice pre-spring day!
[09:04] <Laney> you? good day off?
[09:04] <seb128> yeah, we went to the spa, that was nice
[09:04] <Laney> cucumber on the eyes and all that
[09:04]  * Laney pictures it
[09:09] <didrocks> hey Laney
[09:12] <Laney> 👋 didrocks
[09:40] <k_alam> seb128: We have some issue with systemd-240, first one is this....https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unity-greeter/+bug/1815493
[09:41] <seb128> I saw that in the backlog yesterday evening
[09:41] <seb128> did you try to grab Robert about it?
[09:42] <k_alam> yes, I couldn't reach him.....in the issue he said he is prepared to remove those...
[09:42] <k_alam> 2nd issue is we can't logout with gnome-session
[09:43] <k_alam> reproducible with flashback session as well
[09:43] <seb128> why not?
[09:43] <seb128> since when?
[09:43] <k_alam> since systemd-240
[09:44] <seb128> "fun"
[09:44] <k_alam> ystemctl --user start --wait gnome-session-flashback.target just hangs and can't reach greeter after logout.......do u know anything similar ?
[09:44] <k_alam> *systemctl
[09:45] <k_alam> same for unity-session.target
[09:46] <seb128> I've no idea about that one
[09:49] <k_alam> muktupavels pointed out this but reverting that didn't help.....https://github.com/systemd/systemd/commit/109b0cbf24443b54109a1b6dac010bdf3b96d93c#diff-69ea3a0848eb29638bc663cf16af1b2d
[09:51] <k_alam> loginctl terminate-session <id> works though
[09:52] <seb128> it needs debugging
[09:53] <seb128> unsure about the mlockall thing, I don't understand enough why that was added
[09:53] <seb128> but it looks like neither Robert not mterry remember
[09:54] <seb128> so it's probably fine to drop, I would still like to have the security team opinion on it
[09:55] <seb128> I asked them for feedback
[09:58] <k_alam> journalctl -f doesn't show much....https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/6hFYcKbVKn/......the issue is systed doesn't print anything even with LogLevel=debug when --wait fails
[10:17] <andyrock> good morning!
[10:18] <didrocks> hey andyrock
[12:06] <jbicha> seb128: hi, is it time to open up translations in LP for disco?
[12:19] <seb128> jbicha, we should yes, thx for the reminder, I will take care of that
[13:31] <mitya57_> Trevinho: hi, any news about compiz?
[14:06] <didrocks> jbicha: thanks for making the modifications! dh-sequence-* are interesting, didn't know they existed
[14:07] <didrocks> jbicha: are you planning to sync it? Maybe I'll wait for that upload to promote, wdyt?
[14:08] <jbicha> it will autosync
[14:09] <jbicha> the dh-sequence is very new, it will only work in disco https://manpages.debian.org/unstable/dh#OPTIONS
[14:10] <didrocks> interesting, quite puzzling to have an unexisting package in build-deps :)
[14:10] <jbicha> it does exist :)
[14:10] <jbicha> the dh provider has to manually add a Provides: to enable the feature, see https://launchpadlibrarian.net/409834438/pkgbinarymangler_143_144.diff.gz
[14:10] <jbicha> so you could do that for dh-migrations if you wanted
[14:11] <didrocks> yeah, so it's a virtual package, not a real one, correct?
[14:11] <jbicha> yes
[14:11] <didrocks> (that was my "it doesn't really exists" ;)
[14:11] <didrocks> ok, we agree
[14:11] <jbicha> :) :)
[14:11] <didrocks> yeah, good idea for dh-migrations, adding on my list
[14:13] <didrocks> oh, I missed Go 1.12 RC1 is out! \o/
[14:13] <jbicha> it technically needs debhelper 12 to work too (although it could use a lower compat level)
[14:13] <didrocks> (RC means that Google is running it internally by default)
[14:14] <didrocks> jbicha: ah, you didn't bump dh build-dep though?
[14:14] <didrocks> like build-dep on debhelper 12, even if keeping compat level 11
[14:14] <jbicha> yeah, oops
[14:14] <jbicha> yes
[14:14] <didrocks> not a biggie, I think just stage it
[14:15] <jbicha> practically, it's unlikely to have a system with an older debhelper and the new provides, but people do weird things with ppas and such
[14:16] <didrocks> exactly, hence only staging it
[14:17] <jbicha> I generally avoided bumping debhelper compat to 12 for library packages just to be extra cautious until Buster is released
[14:24] <jbicha> didrocks: btw, for Debian GNOME packages, you'll need to manually run dh_gnome_clean (or otherwise update debian/control) if you switch to dh-sequence-gnome
[14:25] <didrocks> ah, the hook doesn't do it for you?
[14:26] <jbicha> it doesn't know how
[14:26] <jbicha> if you drop --with gnome and ** debian/control ** doesn't yet say dh-sequence-gnome, it won't run the dh_gnome stuff
[14:27] <didrocks> okidoki
[14:27] <jbicha> so that's just the first time to bootstrap stuff, after that things work well
[14:27] <didrocks> gotcha
[14:30] <seb128> ok, meeting time!
[14:30] <seb128> #startmeeting Desktop Team Meeting 2019-02-12
[14:30] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Feb 12 14:30:28 2019 UTC.  The chair is seb128. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[14:30] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[14:30] <seb128> Roll call: andyrock, didrocks, duflu (out), jbicha, jamesh (out), jibel, kenvandine, laney, oSoMoN, tkamppeter, trevinho, robert_ancell (out)
[14:30] <andyrock> o/
[14:30] <didrocks> hey hey o/
[14:31] <tseliot> o/
[14:31] <kenvandine> \o
[14:31] <Trevinho> helloo
[14:31] <oSoMoN> 👽/
[14:31] <seb128> tseliot, tjaalton, sorry, I copied the list from previous week and seems that didn't include you
[14:31] <seb128> k, look like we have most of the team, let's get started
[14:32] <seb128> #topic rls bugs
[14:32] <seb128> the incoming lists
[14:32] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:32] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:32] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-incoming-bug-tasks.html
[14:33] <seb128> bb has no desktop entry (also good to see that page small, is that a bug or a result of foundations finally dealing with their tagged bugs?)
[14:33] <seb128> cc has no desktop entry
[14:33] <Trevinho> I think bug 1772811 is already targetted
[14:34] <seb128> that's the disco one
[14:34] <seb128> Trevinho, can you assign it to yourself?
[14:34] <andyrock> it's because it's not assigned in mutter
[14:35] <seb128> right
[14:35] <Trevinho> ok
[14:35] <seb128> easy to fix, thx Marco
[14:35] <seb128> tracking lists
[14:36] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-bb-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:36] <seb128> so same one we just discussed
[14:36] <seb128> bug #1767660
[14:37] <seb128> tjaalton, ^ opinion on that one?
[14:38] <seb128> to be it doesn't seem important enough to use team tracking
[14:38] <seb128> it doesn't prevent people to work on it/SRU
[14:38] <seb128> I vote -wontfix
[14:38] <seb128> other opinions?
[14:38] <seb128> -notfixing I mean
[14:39] <Laney> sure, don't know if that works for accepted bugs though, might have to won't fix the task
[14:39] <seb128> right, that's a bit annoying
[14:39] <seb128> do we still have that launchpad bug that if I delete the bionic line we can't add it back ever?
[14:40] <jbicha> you can add it back
[14:40] <Laney> dunno
[14:40] <seb128> k, let me delete the line then and tag
[14:40] <Laney> no opinion on whether that's better or worse than closing the bug task
[14:40] <Laney> seems you prefer that, so fine
[14:41] <jbicha> it's annoying that LP doesn't show fixed bugs in search results by default so it makes it tough for people to find bugs that still affect them on the LTS release
[14:41] <seb128> bug #1777994
[14:42] <seb128> that one has been uploaded apparently, so setting fix commited
[14:42] <seb128> bug #1799614
[14:42] <seb128> assigning that one to Robert
[14:43] <seb128> that's it for bionic
[14:43] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-cc-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:43] <seb128> that has the same snapd-glib one for Robert and that's it
[14:43] <kenvandine> seb128: robert knows about that and said he would ask about it.
[14:44] <seb128> kenvandine, he should assign himself targetted bugs so they don't end up having to be reviewed
[14:44] <kenvandine> snapd has an exception and this is to track snapd changes
[14:44] <kenvandine> yeah
[14:44] <seb128> thx
[14:44] <seb128> http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-dd-tracking-bug-tasks.html
[14:45] <seb128> that has bug #1772811 which we already discussed
[14:45] <seb128> and that's it
[14:45] <seb128> #topic update_excuses_by_team.html#desktop-packages
[14:45] <seb128> Laney, your turn :)
[14:45] <Laney> k
[14:45] <talx> hello folks, any preseeding guru here ?
[14:46] <Laney> The following packages have unmet dependencies.
[14:46] <Laney>  emacs-common : Breaks: edb (< 1.32) but 1.31-3 is to be installed
[14:46] <Laney> good old emacs
[14:46] <seb128> talx, hey, we are in the middle of our weekly team meeting, please stand by 10 min or so (or use #ubuntu-devel or #ubuntu-installer)
[14:46] <seb128> I can have a look to emacs/edb
[14:47] <talx> seb128, okay would you pme if you can when its over?
[14:47] <seb128> talx, sure
[14:47] <Laney> there's some archive admin stuff
[14:47] <Laney> gnome-control-center/gvfs
[14:48] <Laney> and the others need looking at basically
[14:48] <seb128> I can deal with the archive admin things
[14:49] <seb128> k, let's quickly review/find owners for the other ones
[14:49] <seb128> jbicha, gnome-desktop3 ftbfs, are you getting anywhere with that?
[14:50] <seb128> or do you need help?
[14:50] <seb128> it has been there for almost a week
[14:50] <seb128> (imho dealing with breaking from existing uploads should be higher priority than stacking more updates)
[14:50] <seb128> tjaalton, is the mesa/armhf ftbfs on your list? (impacts Debian as well I think)
[14:51] <jbicha> seb128: gnome-desktop is a brand new test so technically not a regression
[14:51] <seb128> network-manbager/ppc64el is annoying, I can try to have a look
[14:51] <seb128> jbicha, regression or not it failed to build so that's not going to work
[14:51] <seb128> we can't hint/skip ftbfses
[14:52] <seb128> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-desktop3/3.31.90-1ubuntu1
[14:52] <tjaalton> seb128: yes, upstream knows
[14:52] <jbicha> I was implying we could temporarily skip that broken test until we figure out what's going with Hebrew stuff
[14:52] <seb128> tjaalton, ok, thx
[14:52] <Laney> is "until" ever going to happen?
[14:52] <seb128> jbicha, did you upstream that failure?
[14:52] <seb128> do you need help debugging?
[14:52] <seb128> let's discuss it here after the meeting
[14:53] <seb128> but best to fix rather than skip
[14:53] <Laney> yes, I'd like to argue with the notion that tests are OK to ignore just because they're new
[14:54] <seb128> +1
[14:54] <didrocks> especially if coming to cover a new feature IMHO
[14:54] <seb128> k, that's consensus to not skip
[14:54] <didrocks> or an experienced regression
[14:54] <seb128> let's discuss it in a bit with those interested
[14:55] <Laney> I'll look at udisks2 a bit, annoyed that is so bad on ppc64el
[14:56] <seb128> librsvg seems like it's green on http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#gobject-introspection so I guess outdated report
[14:56] <seb128> thx Laney
[14:56] <seb128> tracker is faiing on armhf/64 , who wants to have a look to that one?
[14:57] <seb128> 'Aborted (core dumped)'
[14:57] <seb128> looks like a real issue
[14:57] <jbicha> seb128: gobject-introspection is very new, I think it may pass if retried
[14:58] <seb128> ah, librsvg dropped now after a reload, good :p
[14:58] <seb128> jbicha, that isn't on the list?
[14:58] <seb128> ah, it's under foundations
[14:58] <seb128> well the tracker issue on arm looks real
[14:58] <Laney> I retried g-i
[14:59] <seb128> hum, in fact from the history seems sometime it's ok
[14:59] <seb128> thx Laney
[14:59] <Laney> tracker could do with someone looking, yeah
[14:59] <seb128> I can try to at least get a bt of that abort and upstream that
[14:59] <Laney> could be me but maybe somebody who doesn't normally take these issues might want to look :-)
[15:00] <seb128> k
[15:01]  * Laney coughs
[15:01] <seb128> so I think we reviewed the list?
[15:01] <seb128> no-one seems to want to step up for tracker :(
[15:01] <seb128> maybe we need to start more direct assignements, going to discuss that with willcooke
[15:01] <seb128> anyway
[15:02] <Laney> team topic for next week
[15:02] <seb128> #topic AOB
[15:02] <didrocks> thx
[15:02] <seb128> yes, good idea
[15:02] <Laney> if you're not at the meeting you get to avoid those assignments
[15:02] <jbicha> (tracker might just be flaky)
[15:02] <seb128> flaky is something worth fixing :)
[15:02] <Laney> some people are never at the meeting
[15:02] <Laney> indeed
[15:04] <seb128> k, 30s for AOB topics
[15:05] <seb128> seems not, let's wrap then
[15:05] <seb128> thanks team!
[15:06] <kenvandine> thanks!
[15:06] <seb128> #endmeeting
[15:06] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Feb 12 15:06:01 2019 UTC.
[15:06] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-desktop/2019/ubuntu-desktop.2019-02-12-14.30.moin.txt
[15:06] <didrocks> thx
[15:06] <oSoMoN> thanks
[15:06] <Laney> ty
[15:06] <seb128> jbicha, so can you can give some more context on that hebrew test?
[15:06] <kenvandine> zyga: i've merged that gtk-common-themes fix
[15:07] <jbicha> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/tree/master/tests
[15:07] <kenvandine> zyga: i'll get it in candidate today and let hang out there a couple days for testing
[15:07] <jbicha> so there is https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/commit/f3ca0e4d794
[15:08] <jbicha> but there is also https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/merge_requests/27
[15:08] <gitbot> GNOME issue (Merge request) 27 in gnome-desktop "WIP: po: Update Hebrew translation" [8. Translation, Opened]
[15:12] <jbicha> I talked with the tracker maintainer yesterday and he expects to do a tracker 2.2 release in the next few days (perhaps a bit beta-ish)
[15:13] <jbicha> I wouldn't spend too much time on tracker 2.1 now since 2.2 had a lot of improvements (thanks Andy!) with tests and some code reorganization
[15:14] <andyrock> I'm still waiting for review on some tracker changes
[15:14] <andyrock> also I forgot to push the port to python3 for functional test
[15:14] <andyrock> I'll try to do it asap
[15:14] <andyrock> https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker/merge_requests/54
[15:14] <jbicha> andyrock: he was talking about releasing this week, thanks :)
[15:14] <gitbot> GNOME issue (Merge request) 54 in tracker "Fix several memory leaks and memory corruptions" [Opened]
[15:15] <seb128> jbicha, k, makes sense
[15:15] <andyrock> jbicha: if that MP is not merged we need to distro-patch at least this commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/tracker/merge_requests/54/diffs?commit_id=a7be8e9cc19bb53867d28e323fd2da32073e48cf
[15:15] <gitbot> GNOME issue (Merge request) 54 in tracker "Fix several memory leaks and memory corruptions" [Opened]
[15:19] <seb128> andyrock, maybe you can nag Carlos about reviewing it?
[15:20] <zyga> kenvandine: thank you
[15:21] <kenvandine> zyga: it's in edge now if you want to try it
[15:27] <kenvandine> Trevinho: hey, have you been involved in the Remmina snap?
[15:31] <seb128> kenvandine, he did write the yaml iirc
[15:32] <jbicha> hmm
[15:33] <kenvandine> i heard they've been getting bug reports and have some issues they need help with
[15:33] <kenvandine> seb128: i've offered to help
[15:34] <kenvandine> but wanted to see if Trevinho had any insight into the issues, they were vague
[15:34] <kenvandine> and i heard they've talked to Trevinho already
[15:36] <seb128> kenvandine, thx
[15:44] <k_alam> didrocks: Hi, the mps we talked about for ubuntu-themes and settings ?
[15:45] <jbicha> seb128: btw tracker passed on retry
[15:45] <seb128> k
[15:46] <Laney> if at first test don't succeed, (re)try, (re)try again
[15:46] <Laney> good motto eh
[15:47] <jbicha> some tests seem to pass better when the autopkgtest infrastructure isn't heavily loaded. That means that uploading a heavy package like g-i will get more failures on first try :|
[15:50] <jbicha> for gnome-desktop, there's also https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-desktop/blob/master/.gitlab-ci.yml so it looks like the test does work on Fedora Rawhide
[15:51] <jbicha> the Hebrew isn't being translated properly, you can see the .png's in the meson-logs/ in your build directory
[15:51] <Laney> real systems are often heavily loaded
[15:51] <didrocks> k_alam: yes, what about them?
[15:51] <didrocks> and we only talked about ubuntu-themes AFAIK
[15:52] <zyga> kenvandine: thank you! :-)
[15:53] <k_alam> didrocks: I have assigned you for ubuntu-settings too...
[15:54] <k_alam> is this ok ?
[15:55] <jbicha> k_alam: assigning specific people probably isn't necessary
[15:55] <didrocks> k_alam: interesting, if you have just done it, I didn't receive the LP email yet
[15:55] <jbicha> unless you don't want anyone else to look at it :)
[15:55] <didrocks> but yeah, I can give a look at the same time than -themes
[15:56] <didrocks> k_alam: you didn't assign it: https://bugs.launchpad.net/~didrocks/+assignedbugs
[15:57] <k_alam> didrocks: no I mean, as a reviewer
[15:57] <didrocks> seb128: are we going to get rygel & co dealt by security this cycle? I think I'll unassign until it's OK ;)
[15:58] <didrocks> k_alam: got it
[15:58] <k_alam> jbicha: ha ha but no
[15:58] <didrocks> I didn't receive any email
[15:58] <didrocks> but found it
[15:58] <jbicha> andyrock: maybe LP: #1815317 is for you?
[15:59] <andyrock> jbicha: kk
[15:59] <k_alam> didrocks: And one more if didn't not get mail for that as well...https://code.launchpad.net/~khurshid-alam/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/362989
[16:00] <didrocks> oki
[16:01] <k_alam> didrocks: Thanks.
[16:10] <seb128> didrocks, I doubt it's going to be this cycle at this point
[16:12] <didrocks> ok, I'll unassign from those bugs to clean up my list
[16:12] <seb128> wfm, I still have on my todo to do the multiarch thing
[16:12] <seb128> but yeah, security is taking a while, I mention that at fosdem
[16:14] <didrocks> yep, the multi-arch is still pending ;)
[16:16] <seb128> I keep saying "this week" but I hate those paperwork tasks :p
[16:16]  * seb128 should really do that
[16:16] <seb128> also I'm unsure to properly test that I'm not breaking something by doing it
[16:16] <seb128> oh well, next week I do it :)
[16:22] <seb128> andyrock, btw I think you commented on a bug like that one before, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1810382 ... do you know how the code hide the "write a review" button for snaps? it's clearly not working for that user but I don't know what debug info would be useful, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/410601843/Screenshot%20from%202019-02-09%2020-39-05.png
[16:23] <andyrock> seb128: let me check
[16:24] <seb128> thx
[16:37] <andyrock> seb128: mmm maybe the problem is that since https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-software/commit/e54b31cc85ddef6f9579cb85bbdf53dbb9d9091d are no longer NOT_REVIEWABLE
[16:38] <andyrock> from the journal logs linked in the bug it looks like ubuntu-reviews plugin is still in cosmic and odrs plugin is disabled
[16:39] <andyrock> seb128: I'll comment on the bug, asking robert to confirm this
[16:43] <andyrock> seb128: commented
[16:43] <andyrock> let's see if robert answers
[16:44] <gQuigs> anybody feeling need for anacron/cron these days with systemd timers?
[17:04] <jbicha> gQuigs: Debian GNOME is removing anacron from default install for Buster
[17:08] <gQuigs> jbicha: linky?  my search foo is failing me
[17:08] <jbicha> gQuigs: https://salsa.debian.org/gnome-team/meta-gnome3/commits/debian/master
[17:09] <jbicha> we would have uploaded by now but the gjs/s390x removal is still being annoying in Debian
[17:10] <gQuigs> ty!
[17:18] <gQuigs> will start a thread on -dev-discuss...
[17:37] <jbicha> seb128: I'm close-ish to a fix on gnome-desktop, it's environment variables that were interfering
[19:41] <seb128> jbicha, @gnome-desktop, great :)
[19:43] <seb128> andyrock, thx, indeed we use odrs only in disco atm, but I though that in cosmic when I tested on friday I didn't have the review button for snaps :/
[19:44] <seb128> kenvandine, can you make sure Robert sees https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-software/+bug/1810382/comments/8 ?
[19:45] <kenvandine> seb128: sure
[19:45] <seb128> thx
[19:45] <seb128> kenvandine, btw I read from your weekly summary that you/Olivier made progress on debugging the gtk build issue, what was it?
[19:48] <kenvandine> gdk-pixbuf-pixdata built in the snap was linked against the system libgdkpixbuf
[19:48] <kenvandine> not sure what the actual fix was, oSoMoN is still working on it
[21:03] <oSoMoN> seb128, there are in fact multiple issues and I haven't finished addressing them all, the gdk-pixbuf-pixdata one was the first error, I solved it with https://gitlab.gnome.org/Community/Ubuntu/gnome-3-28-1804-sdk/commit/49d40114626a6788d83e3e4cba28913b42126c8f
[21:07] <Trevinho> mitya57: done https://code.launchpad.net/compiz
[22:33] <seb128> jbicha, did you see my comment on https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-control-center/+bug/1815504 btw?