Sir, I think I was fairly respectful in my comment to you, not warranting your argumentative and lengthy response.  We are talking about a description of path/road in the woods on a web site, nothing remotely important.  
I’m not sending this with the intention of arguing with you.  I actually agree with you on Wood Lane now, seeing it’s on the City’s GIS map.  I still don’t agree about the fire road, since it’s not listed on the city’s gis mapping, but if it’s that important to you, I withdraw on the issue.  I might suggest simply giving it no name if it’s unclear.    
PS:  I would not discount other web sites use of OSM to populate their map data.  Without them OSM probably would not exist, or at least not be what it is.  I’m sure you do not you don’t agree, but let’s move on.   Thanks.
