Somewhat of a mixed bag here. Overall the sizes of buildings are accurate and off-nadir is being accounted for, but there's definitely some room for improvement. For example a few footprints should be more complex than rectangles and the SE footprints have been moved to include parts of paths (which are a similar colour to the walls). Consider the highways in imagery and how people are moving and accessing areas. The more complex footprints can help map users identify which building they're looking at.

Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170898572
            