Yes, your track certainly has more points and better represents the layout of the trail. I was mainly trying to show that our two devices got noticeably different readings, for example on the northernmost part of the Hudson Loop. The median between all passes, yours and mine, is pretty close to the path on imagery, so I do think the imagery is accurate here.

The southern part of my track looks weird because I took a few paces onto the center east-west path from each side of it, just so that it would be captured on the trace so I'd know to add it. Yours is more accurate particularly in this area, but this is a good example of how GPS can have drift, since the path that is shown on my trace isn't the exact path that I took. It averaged out some of my movement.

I noticed that you added that tree, so when I made my modifications to restore some of the previous geometry, I kept that section since you clearly had knowledge that I missed.