I think that this footprint is still too large and includes multiple footprints or gardens, though I can see why it's more difficult to interpret in this case because of the partial tree cover, and if you're zoomed way in your interpretation can be thrown off. Looking at a zoom level of 18/19 (scale of 50/100 m) will tend to give the best picture (you can see this in the url when editing in ID editor) for interpretation before zooming in to place nodes. You can see how I mapped these footprints in Changeset: 165741655
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165351182
            