The fields are used intermittently for grazing. They do have cattle operations and there are times where the fields are opened to grazing but it’s primary use is river irrigated crop land which is why I originally opted to tag as landuse=farmland as opposed to meadow. I think Esri Clarity is from around 2008 so it’s really old. Esri Imagery is from 2018 and it shows both crop cultivation and grazing.

The original trace was from Maxar because it was the most recent prior to Bings upload in 2022. Esri and Maxar are basically the same from what I’ve seen in my editing. West of 95 is what I’ve been working on heavily the last 2-3 days since your initial edits. That should be appearing on the slippy soon. There are large groves of oak, maple, and other broadleaves trees that are clustered around the river. West of 95, there are the same clusters but you’re definitely right l, there’s a lot more scrub. I’ve made that distinction (and continue to work on it). East of 95, I agree with your distinction. In my haste, I made a large scale revert that took everything back to what it was prior to your edit. My goal is to finish west of 95 before I get to the east. I’m a little wary of the wetland tag just because the aerial makes its look that way but on the ground but it’s quite different. The river is deep and the area on either side that appears to be wetland is often just scrub or heath (river hasn’t flooded since 1984). But, like I said, I’m still working on it and I do appreciate you bringing that area back to my attention because it’s always been one of those things that I’ve meant to get back to but have been working on other things. 

Also, just another note that I wanted to reach out to you about. I noticed you made some highway classification changes. I don’t disagree. I’d just ask that before making those in the future, you consult the local community and the Nevada guidance. If you have any comments/suggestions. Let me know and we can get those added. Thanks! 