AAAARRGH so you mean the aerodrome closed? I really understood you meant the changeset had been closed, which left me much confused.

However, what you did is not the best idea, in my (not so very) humble opinion. I will gladly believe that the aerodrome closed, but instead of removing it you had better added "closed:" or "disused:" tagging, that would have avoided re-adding the field, as I am sure may now happen.
Unless you dissuade me, I intend to re-add the field, properly tagged as being disused.
Kind regards from far-away Portugal!
