Hello, I have reverted many of your most recent edits in Northwest Las Vegas for the following reasons:

- Features which do not yet exist should not be mapped, as this is misleading since they will show up on the map as currently existing features that can be visited and accessed by people. While things are under construction, they may be mapped with the proper construction tags. When construction is complete, they can then be tagged as any existing building/road/area would. 

- Using the name=* key to describe an object's construction status or common object name (e.g. using 'proposed park') is incorrect usage of that key. A literal proposed park with the name "Proposed Park" would imply that it is actually called "Proposed Park". While something is under-construction, the official name of that soon-to-be-completed object can be displayed, but any information about the object being proposed or under-construction could be instead added under the note=* key which makes it visible to editors but not on the map.

- Also regarding incorrectly naming objects, the landowner's name should not be added to the landuse, especially undeveloped land. While the private individuals' names are public records, it is reasonable not to expect to see their names plastered on a map. Furthermore, adding a name to a physical object implies that that is the real world name. For example, if a piece of land is owned by Mike Jones, adding the owner's name to the object's name implies that the sand on the ground itself is named "Mike Jones". If the sand here was significant enough that it had its own name, then should the name be added.