Hello! You make a good point; somehow, for some reason, I missed the words "dedicated bike path" from the key at the bottom right. But I also tend to map with deference to what's physically present on the ground, and the FTT paths don't have any signs indicating use. In cases where a source map and physical trail signage are inconsistent, I defer to what's physically there because most trail users are probably unaware that this map exists. Also, in some cases, and despite any maps, I think any path that dead-ends at a building, playground, parking lot, etc. should be a foot path and not indicated for bike travel because anyone on a bike is interested in staying moving on a through-route and probably not interfering with playing kids, etc. The Great OSM Path Controversy doesn't really acknowledge this like I think it should. But you're right, in this case, I think we should make the FTT trails' paths =designated.