Thanks for the information. 

There are some good things in there and some surprising things, but it’s your platform to decide. 

In terms of the legal implications, I’m not only talking about from those who use OSM. Im talking about what happens when users sue corporations for what’s happened to them as a result of OSM guiding them to lands they’re not allowed to be on and they get hurt, and then the corporations then sue OSM. BPP the land owner of the land we are talking about is a multibillion organization who’s been proactive about decommissioning these trails in the past. Not only does mapping them result in the demise of these trails - which is probably why eerib seems to have so many complaints (based upon eeribs own commentary), but highlighting the trails just results in more people being at risk. They’re not safe for most people. Which is why the DANGER No Trespassing signs are up in the area. 

Anyways, I’ll ask BPP if they want the trails removed from OSM and you’ll either hear from their Counsel or you won’t. But when/if BPP is sued for many millions - and it could happen - if OSM was involved then you’ll be dragged into it too. That’s why Trailforks has proactively decided not to show these trails on its maps.  

Im just a guy trying to keep people safe in the woods. I’m out of this discussion but I do appreciate the constructive dialogue even though I oppose some of your principals. 

Me last try. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD EERIB PLEASE STOP. 