Thanks for the comment! I actually had read that section before, and the discussions linked from it, but between the actual contents of the discussions (which seem to have mostly coalesced around agreement for deprecating "none" as long as it's explicitly documented as such), and the fact that the "none" value has been explicitly marked as deprecated in the Values table for almost 3 years now, I kind of missed that the section about the deprecation still uses a more cautious language (which IMHO seems inconsistent with the discussions and the table).

In any case, I am of course open to reverting this change, but I'd rather take the opportunity to help resolve the apparent contradiction — ideally by editing the wiki to reflect the outcome of those decisions and the fact that the value is already marked as deprecated in the table. What do you think?