I would prefer to speak to a human over ChatGPT. The latter is known for confabulating. For instance, I cannot find any combative comments from b-jazz. As for me, I am sorry that I was not more receptive to being told I was wrong even though I turned out to be right. I am additionally sorry for lumping you in with other golf course mappers making incorrect edits when all you did was make incorrect golf course edits. I am also sorry for not displaying good faith in response to your lack of faith in the advice we both gave you.

And as for the human who, unlike ChatGPT, can detect insincerity in these apologies: You did not display a willingness to learn when you refused advice from mappers with years of experience. You were not singled out to any extent greater than that you are singly responsible for your edits. All accusatory comments on your changesets appear to be factual. You were not gatekept from the platform in anyway other than to indicate that incorrect edits would be reverted. Collaboration is a two-way street that you have metaphorically set up a road block on with your comments. You were offered many chances at discussion, but refused them. This is a common theme amongst golf course mappers, who I proceeded to lump you in with. I am sorry that I was hostile to you, but that is a natural response when one's community is disrespected.

Furthermore, it is disrespectful to me and to b-jazz to completely ignore what we tell you only to suddenly act understanding when a moderator reiterates them. Tone is not the only way to show respect.