@VLD549: We have explained this to you a huge number of times.  I am afraid I’ll be forced to do it again.  And apologies in the tone seems a little harsh, we are a little tired of explaining this over and over.

Please read carefully, this is important.

Any object in OSM can be changed several times.  When something seems wrong, it is important to inspect the "history" of an object.  This is the way to know WHO committed a change and WHEN.

To say it otherwise, the last user who touched an object is not always responsible for a mistake.  Shaming an innocent user through changeset comments—which are public—will make you look like an disrespectful and incompetent individual.  I am sure you are a kind person, so please make sure to use your skills properly.  I understand that your job requires you to monitor name changes of some objects on the map, so if you think you have spotted a mistake, make sure to "hit" the person who did it instead of calling random mappers and ask them to "justify their changes".

From what I can see here, user VLD548 (obviously your colleague at Meta) is the last mapper who touched this object… but this changeset only fixed an obvious mistake with a capitalisation issue, to transform "boospoort" into "Boospoort".  This is because the name of places (streets, parks…) are expected to start with a capital letter.

About the history: you can open any object in OSM.  If you click on this strange object named "Porte de bois - Boospoort", you have a "View History" link at the bottom, it brings you to this page: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/891811623/history

Read it from bottom to up to understand how an object changed and WHO did it and WHEN.

In version #1, the path was named "Orée du bois" by user Supergreg.  Then, in version #2, Supergreg renamed it into "Porte du bois".  In version #3, Tommy3009 renamed it into "Porte du bois - boospoort", then in version #4, VLD548 fixed the capitalisation issue caused by version 3.

It looks obvious to me that the suspicious name was introduced in version #3.  Incidently, I have already spotted several dubious changes by user Tommy3009, such as pseudo-translations with obvious language or spelling errors.  As you can see, the changeset number is a link which you can click.  I suggest you address your comments to the mapper who created version 3 instead of here.