Hi, Xvtn, 

The brochure and map regarding this particular spot state, "only trails that are signed and marked as shown on this brochure." Perhaps in theory these could be marked as unofficial, I can consider that, but given that this is the resource for many trail databases, it seems unadvisable as in this particular location, it's against both best practices and regulations.  I'm happy to provide documentation, such as a copy of the map that I used as a reference.  

The northern area that I edited (north of the Santa Clara River), I have been there; the trails that I removed there are not only not on the official map in violation of the above statement, but any that exist additionally cross private property and cannot legally be accessed. I asked the managing field office directly regarding these specific trails, and was informed they were not legally accessible as they as previously mapped on here cross a private inholding that does not permit public access.  So in that area in particular, present or not, they are not legal to access and someone attempting to do so could in theory be reported or arrested for trespassing.  It seems unadvisable to display those in particular at all given that.  Just my two cents on that front.  