Hi there, I don't know if you are with the city government or not (your username indicates that), but there is better background imagery available.

To see the full background list, open the `Background Settings` menu (default keyboard shortcut `b`) and go through that.

Since you are _probably_ with the city government, you _probably_ want to use the `Mesa County GIS Valleywide 2022` background.

Moving on to what you've been mapping recently (bicycle lanes), many of those have already been mapped as part of the road infrastructure using `cycleway=lane`. You may be interested in reading https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle for the distinction between a cycle path and a cycle lane.

If you are wanting to model the position of the cycle lanes, you might want to use `width` tags. For example, with `North 3rd Street`, I would use `width=33'` (I use edge of gutter to edge of gutter, but most people will say kerb-kerb; I prefer to use lower values since that can matter sometimes). Here are the tags I would use (using meters as the unit, instead of feet/inches):
width:lanes:backward=3|1|2
width:lanes:forward=3|1
width=10

If you don't mind an editor with a larger learning curve, take a look at JOSM ( https://josm.openstreetmap.de ). It has many paintstyles that may help you, one of which is specifically for lane and road attributes.

Anyway, I'm glad to see someone from the city mapping as well. I did most of the footpaths in GJ downtown a few years ago.

As an aside, depending upon how accurate/precise you want to be, I _think_ you might want to look into setting the background offset (`Background Settings` -> `Imagery Offset`). The offset for the 2022 imagery (against one of the survey monuments, IIRC) was `0.40; -0.16`.

Thanks,
vorpalblade (Taylor)