I'd like to thank you again for drawing my attention to this oversight. Further research showed I was incorrectly using NAD data which, while very high precision, needs conversion to WGS in order to be useful to this project. I will not be reverting these change sets due to the number of changes made to objects to reflect recent construction and added details. Instead, I will be reviewing the areas I worked in previously to correct the NGS mark positions, update the offset database geometry I've uploaded to reflect their actual position (a very small correction from the imagery as presented), and recorrect the positions of objects. When the work is done, their positions will be as precise as I can make them and we will hopefully not have any more obvious mistakes at the edges of the edited areas.