Hi there. This is a pretty routine type of edit and was not discussed. I'm happy to revert if it messed up any data.

I think your argument has been that `information=*` can be used without `tourism=information` to indicate that something provides information without being a tourist feature? This is essentially treating `information` as a top-level tag on par with `tourism`, instead of as a dependent tag. If you agree with this pattern then I'd hope you'd support my tagging proposal. But either way, it doesn't make sense that the tourist component of a feature could be destroyed while the information part remains.