Hello,

What is this kind of "logic" ?

What does the non "importance" of trees mean ? Because there are forests around ?

If yes, I don't see why this would prevent mapping trees in gardens, parks (what would we do with a botanical garden ?) or streets.

Besides, who would define this criterion ?

Please look at (and read) the wiki => https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:natural%3Dtree

You'll see that there is no restriction criterion that says that trees taken individually would not be "important" for an area !

Look at the map, trees are mapped in cities !

Here in Turku : https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/60.452478/22.278772

Here in Helsinki :
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/60.186738/24.944745
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/60.184449/24.950193
https://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/60.174528/24.983945

All trees (36810) in Helsinki => https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1RvT (7Mb of data so maybe a bit of a wait)

And look elsewhere in the world!

I've restored the deleted data

Best regards