Thanks, but there are some problems with these changes:
1. Do not move buildings according to Ortofoto images, when they are done according to a more precise source (kapor2 or ZBGIS, Slovak cadastre map). Your changes to buildings like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61399303 at Zahradnicka have damaged correct buildings to incorrect positions.

2. You cannot have 2 level building like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/61399303 and inside it a 7 level building like https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1318227763 . This is incorrect 3D mapping and should be done differently (7 level 'building' outline and then inside the 2- and 7-level parts), see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Simple_3D_Buildings .

3. address like https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12200316201 is incomplete. You could have added a 'fixme' tag so that others notice and finish it.

4. You should not have deleted https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/6502562114 but just change its tags to the new shop in its place, not create a new node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12200314988 . History of shops at the same place is useful for other mappers.

5. Agains, building length of https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/78068912 was correct according to cadastre map and imagery. You did not need to change it.

6. For removed buildings, we tend to change their tag from building=* to removed:building=*, not remove them completely from OSM. They may still be visible on older imagery and mappers may be confused. See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix .