I somewhat disagree that a non-statutory sign about pedestrian priority justifies changing a highway=cycleway to footway on w229192486.

Pedestrians have priority on ALL shared cycleways, per HIghway Code Rule H2 "Cyclists should give way to pedestrians on shared use cycle tracks and to horse riders on bridleways."

Legally irrelevant paint on the tarmac shouldn't be a justification to hide part of Cycleway 27 in the OSM Carto rendering.