Thanks for responding, you obviously don't read the sources i provided before you make the changeset. 

It's  a little ironic you say trusted more a official gov site when you cited as source justification for the name in French in this changeset comments : https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/158914049

Because the notice of Urban Brussels don't talk about "La Marolle" and just describe what Rue de Montserrat is and the delimatation. Even in NL it's not clear that they talking about the delimitation of "De Marolle"  

In the documents i provided from "cercle d'histoire" , ARAU or Arhiviris , if you know the neightbourout and make a minimum of overlapp/comparaison with local knowledge my move is correct and just moving it with one source that clearly one word guessing with one source for the notice is a lack of critical thinking in your changeset. 
(it's not because it's on a offial website that it exist , for exemple http://sites.heritage.brussels/fr/trees/6886 )

The first adding of the node already warm up  attention of another mappers, i haven't react on that time as i knowing the name for decade and i have choosen not to add it personnaly as i consider it as a historical denomination more an actual usage. You put it anyway i respect your choose but if i make correction please don't just move this with one source and not reading sources i provided.

Also even permiters of "les Marolles" has some contestation (see "Les rues disparues de Bruxelles" aux éditions Rossel, 1979) not sure adding more confusion on the map by placing the node on limit is a good think.

I again ask you to reconsider this edit and at least moving the node on the location i placed in my previous changeset or consider that ground verifiability is not possible and delete it.