Thanks for taking the time to clarify the process.

I’m still fairly sure this is a violation of the licensing terms of the DoBIH. Certainly in spirit, even if the details of the copying process could be argued. Essentially, the DoBIH authors have spent a *lot* of time measuring hill summit locations, and they should get attribution and credit for that work. Building on their work in OSM by moving the hill summits in OSM to closely align with the measurements done by the DoBIH authors is deserving of that attribution.

I realise this is something you’ve done with the best of intentions, and it’s taken many hours. I absolutely agree that it would be great to have all the summits in the Lakes accurately positioned for everyone to use. But I think that needs to be done with due regard for the work put in by the DoBIH authors, as requested by the license they have put on their data.

I’m going to talk to the OSM Data Working Group (DWG) to get a second opinion on how’s best to move forwards here.