I could 'see' all of the features that I added as building footprints, so if they aren't, then I think it's more of a question of how the imagery is processed by contributors i.e. I don't think the resolution is too low to be workable, but more quantitative instructions along with some ground view and oblique images of areas compared to the aerial ones would be great to have.

I'll probably write in the project comments about that, and reference this disscussion.

Thanks for writing!
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/153727014
            