Hi Makeena, I am wondering why you changed the tags for the ways 979690186, 979690187, 979690188 from "abandoned:highway" to "highway"?

As these paths are blocked off at both ends and are overgrown in reality, I don't think it makes sense to have them appear as paths just with access=no on the map. 

However, I would keep them in OSM to prevent terrain model users from re-mapping them.

Curious to hear your perspective, happy mapping.