Hello cm81447, you have been questioned by both me and other contributors in the past to please discuss mass changes to highways like these before going on a big edit spree like this. You have not yet explained why you are making these changes in your changeset comments or discussion replies, though your edits appear to be based solely on functional classification data. Functional classification definitions typically differ from OSM definitions, and are more geared towards government usages such as identifying how highways should be maintained rather than for civilian navigational purposes. By OSM definitions, a small rural town like Eastport should not have a trunk route. It may make sense from a strategical standpoint in that it links to a cargo port, but that is more of a job for functional classification maps. Primary and secondary would suffice in this scenario, as this is a small town link by relatively minor rural highways.

That aside, you need to please explain what you're doing in changeset comments when it comes to edits like these so other users may understand quickly what's being done. "Fixed road" is very ambiguous, and at a glance to me, I would believe that you have adjusted its alignment, corrected its tags, or something like that which needs very little explanation. If you don't start a discussion for your change, it would be best to at the very least explain why you're making the change so that future questions can be answered.

It is very valuable to have another editor like you willing to make mundane yet big and important highway edits like these, but it becomes disruptive when others can't understand why you're making these changes and can't keep track of them.