I have not and will not add data from copyrighted sources.

Google expressly indicates that "Your content remains yours, which means that you retain any intellectual property rights that you have in your content." https://policies.google.com/terms

That means the copyright in any photos uploaded to Google are held by the person who uploaded it. That is why the note below each of them says "Images may be subject to copyright," and not "Copyright Google." 

Additionally, as I stated before, there is no copyright in factual information. Google says this in their license:

"This license doesn’t cover these types of content: publicly-available factual information that you provide, such as corrections to the address of a local business. That information doesn’t require a license because it’s considered common knowledge that everyone’s free to use." https://policies.google.com/terms

Again, your hyper-zealous understanding of copyright law would mean that you cannot mark a business closed if you got that information from a newspaper, book, TV show, or website which is copyrighted. 

In the last 3 weeks you have wrongly accused me of adding data I didn't add, complained about adding roads which clearly exist and may be mapped per OSM rules, and now you're on me about copyright laws which you don't understand. 

You clearly have a lot of knowledge,  passion, and experience, and I welcome productive feedback on my contributions. But if you don't chill out I'll just mute you so I don't get chastised about this baseless bullshit twice a week.

There aren't many people contributing to OSM Ghana. Let's work together. 