Hi hellmap,I  disagree with your point of view for several compelling reasons:

1. Continuity Despite Alterations: Numerous rivers globally have undergone artificial course changes and remain recognized as the same river. Modifying a section of the course doesn't fundamentally alter the identity of the river.

2. Extensive Tributary Network:After surveying the area, including a visit just three hours ago, I saw an intricate tributary network. Multiple small streams and ditches flow into the river, each with their own smaller tributaries, showcasing a complex hydrological system.

3. Decent Flow Indicators: In specific sections, the river exhibits a noticeable narrowing and increased water visibility, indicating a substantial flow that aligns with the characteristics often associated with small rivers.

4. Ambiguity in River Definition:The lack of a universally clear-cut definition for a river leads to varied interpretations. Given the absence of a precise definition, this rivers features and contributions make a compelling case for its classification as a river.

5. Impact on Canal and Downstream: this rivrr significantly influences the canal, serving as its primary water source. This, in turn, plays a crucial role in sustaining Dārziņu Ateca.

6. Consistency Over Time:While historical significance might not be a direct classification factor, the continuity of this rivers characteristics over a century underscores its identity as the same river/stream, despite changes in mapping conventions.

7. Artificial Changes with Daugava Connection: Despite artificial alterations redirecting the river away from the Daugava, its waters still ultimately find their way into the Daugava river, highlighting a historical connection.

8. Distinguishing Natural Origin:* this river and its tributaries predominantly originate from natural springs, maintaining a connection to its natural origin. Even minor contributions from man-made sources don't negate its overall natural character.

In summary, while acknowledging the existence of smaller ditches, the evidence supports the classification of the river as a river, falling within the spectrum of small rivers, especially considering its natural spring origin and the intricate network it sustains.

Thanks (btw this took my a long time to make lol)