(Following on from discussion on changeset 150711518)

Heya, thanks for doing more work to improve the map round here.

The tagging around Heather Garth still looks quite unconventional to me, and unconventional tagging leads to things on the map being misinterpreted.

I’m trying to work out if ‘Heather Garth’ is the name of a building, or of a street. As in, is the building there a block of flats called Heather Garth, with flats 1-6, which is on an unnamed (but private and operated by the owners of the flats) yard off Bank Street? Or is the building there actually a couple of separately numbered houses on a very short road which is called Heather Garth?

Or, put a different way, the map currently indicates that the address for one of the flats there would be:
1 Heather Garth [house name]
Heather Garth [road name]
Keswick
CA12 5JW

Another way of looking at the same question would be: can you confirm where exactly the name ‘Heather Garth’ is printed in that area? e.g. Is it on a house name plate by a front door, or on a road name sign, or both, or something else?

If I’ve interpreted things correctly, and the intention with this edit was to mark the gravel hardstanding as being owned by the Heather Garth apartments, then I suspect the correct tagging for that is to add the operator= tag to the hardstanding, rather than name=, and change it from highway=residential (which typically indicates a public road) to highway=service (which indicates something more private). In any case, the access tagging is correct on the hardstanding, from your previous edits here.

Looking forwards to having this little corner of Keswick ironed out :) Ta