Hi, just to be clear, OSMUS the organization doesn’t have anything to do with this. It’s just a few of us local mappers discussing what to do about the fact that some parts of these preserves are open to the public while others are off-limits. Each of these preserves used to be mapped as two separate boundary=protected_area relations with disambiguators in the name, but mappers from abroad criticized this approach for making up names. The boundary=forest_compartment areas are the closest alternative that preserves information while retaining just one overall park boundary.

Ideally, yes, the compartments should be connected to the overall park boundaries at each node instead of having these duplicate nodes everywhere. I’ve already cleaned it up for a couple of other preserves, but it’s very tedious.