Just noticed this little under-prioritized segment of Union Square East, secondary when the rest is primary: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420598402

I was inclined to just delete it and extend https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923090985 south to meet https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/923091012. My impression here is that this would be fine as far as the bicycle tagging goes -- the stretch currently covered by https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/420598402 has two-way bike lane paint and the southern end can be approached (dismounted) via the crosswalk. Just wanted to make sure I'm not missing anything.

Thanks, J