Hiya, thanks for the edit here. Unfortunately changing foot=yes to foot=no here is not correct — the `foot` tag reflects the legal status of foot access, not its routing priority, and hence foot=no means that pedestrians using the carriageway is legally not allowed, which is not the case in Lancaster Uni.

See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:foot for documentation of the `foot` key.

To solve the routing problem, it would be useful to know what routing software the user was using, and what their source and destination were. Decent routing software should heavily prioritise pedestrian ways (such as footpaths and separately-mapped pavements). It might be the case that something on the route was not mapped correctly (i.e. was tagged as if it were impassable to pedestrians even though it actually is) so the router thought the only possible route was to use one of the vehicle roundabouts.

Hope that makes sense, thanks
