Oh yeah, i have met a lot of people and community is great, wouldn't be around otherwise. And there are different people fully supporting two-lining and one-lining. 
In the thread you linked, there are advocats of different methods as well. There is a topic in Polish community section and there are also different supporters. What enrages people most, is when someone maps in detail by two-lining and then someone deletes it all, merges up somewhat and doesn't even tag properly the one-line outcome. 
-- this happened there as well. 

My argument was not that the one in question who kept reverting my work, remapped it all one-lining. It was that he didn't even bother to tag it properly. 
All the information i have tagged is gone. Sight impaired people can't make any use of this now. 
You can read up it there: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:tactile_paving

theDM argued about some controversy on wiki, but there is none described in the S5 section of https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle#Miscellaneous It actually clearly specifies what i did, so i did not act against it. 

As it writes "...each way has its supporters and opponents. " 
As i understand, the priority of mapping OSM is to give reliable information to routing companies. I the data is not reliable anymore and details necessary for it are being removed, this lowers OSM value as data source. 
But do tell, if a group of peole can enforce their way of thinking on other community group of people like me, and some people in the local community of the same country feel bad, do we prioritize those people over reliable routing data input?

I really don't have to map tactile_paving info at all, if you think the local community fells bad about it being mapped properly. 
I don't have any blind friends to oppose. 