Yes I have created the wiki page after I was pointed to that requirement, as a sign of respect.  I did discuss this with the local OSM community and they have no issues with our activity.

Also, I see in the organized editing guideline page the following text:

> The Data Working group will intervene for edits the community has issues with, and [we] will not intervene for merely not following the guidelines.

Do you think there are issues with edits in this changeset?  We added species, height and a couple more attributes.  What exactly is wrong with this?

Regarding the Import/Guidelines, I did read that and follow it, the only missing part is the discussion in the global mailing list and a comprehensive import plan description.  It's missing because we don't have an import plan because this doesn't actually look like an import.  The guide suggests in multiple places that this is rather about importing huge amounts of data, e.g. a cadastre decides to share all their data.  This is suggested with phrases like preparing a file with data before importing and sharing on Google Drive.

I'm not sure if this is really needed for our case?  We collect like one hundred trees per week currently.  Is there a way to handle this with a little less bureaucracy?