Hello ferog_v, 
I came across some of the mapping that you have been doing in Cancun, Mexico and have a few questions that I hoped you could help me with.  I have noticed that in the oneway modifications from https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187815 to https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/680187814 appear to be reversed in ESRI World Imagery (Clarity) Beta, as the angled parking and position of parked cars suggests way 680187814 is the entrance way. Could you confirm that by chance?

I also found that a segment of Avenida Chac Mool's (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679585831) directionality seems inconsistent with the connecting segment’s (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/577360043) directionality and the common direction of travel. Could you verify that recent edit? It is difficult to verify for me since there is no new ground imagery, just some from 2019 on the other side (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=21.195381848367006&lng=-86.88677530632697&z=15.20186893026562&pKey=187584573249249&focus=photo).

The following were not mapped by you but curious if you could help verify?:
Some residential loops just south of Avenida Kabah where it meets the trunk have oneway tags, such as on Privada Venezuela (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490607) and Privada Brasil (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490599). However, there are other loops nearby in the same development that may be missing oneway tags. Could you help verify if Privada Paraguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490598),Privada Uruguay (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490614), and Privada Argentina (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/167490605) should have similar oneway tags? ESRI World Clarity Beta seems to suggest a oneway direction from positions of parked cars.

Lastly, I noticed some small, minor cross connectors that were left over from some of your recent classification updates, such as https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/433003017 and https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/679908385. I just wanted to check if you have solidified the classification scheme for the main roads before I made any changes on those type of short segments as I come across them.

But overall the changes you have made look good and seem to match the maps specified in the government documents you have mentioned. These definitely would be good for the larger Mexican community to be aware of for future consistency across all OSM users. Just wanted to see if you saw the post I made in the recently discussed https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/153429214, suggesting to mention the classification updates for Merida and Cancun by that government source in the Mexico Telegram page? I think it would help to get the most active users aware of the source for changes to avoid back and forth reclassifications. Thanks and let me know if I can help in any way. Best.