You're welcome. I think you've understood me correctly, yes. It tends to be better practice to modify existing features than to delete and re add.--- In the case of the large footprint which used to envelope over a dozen buildings here, I could currently argue in favour of either method. For example, the argument could be made that it didn't actually represent any feature which existed/exists, therefore it can be deleted, and re mapping may be easier. On the other hand a feature may be inappropriately tagged, but the geometry accurately represents a feature and it may be beneficial to just change the tagging. --- However if you can tell that data represents existing features, then it is best practice to modify them, as to preserve their history and meta data. --- Features which you are certain do not exist may be deleted. --- I hope this clarifies.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164770871
            