Adding another note. Bicycle parking does not generally need addresses; but if they are added, as they are here, they should be tagged with the standard address tags. For those who don't know, "CD" refers to council district; this tag is unnecessary as: 1, CD boundaries change; and 2, CD jurisdiction can be found because CD boundaries are already mapped. "LocID" is not necessary because the data is not useful to OSM, it may have been in the original data, but not here. LocName is also a non-standard tag that's relatively unnecessary, but it is at least interesting (though in some cases I've found, they are out of date, as they refer to businesses that no longer exist. "side" is a tag that would more appropriately refer to a node on a road, but is not useful here. ObjectID and other ID tags are also not very useful for OSM.
Unfortunately, this data is also, by now, 6 years out of date, and some of these racks no longer exist, as I found on Chatsworth and Sepulveda.
It's also not necessary to name bicycle parking. A bike rack does not need to be tagged with the name "bike rack", as this is redundant and can clutter the map; but this isn't too much of a problem.
This is an overall useful addition, though. It'll just need refining by other users. 
I'll add this comment on the other related changeset 158603085 so that this info can be available if anyone else tries to find out more about this edit.