You appear to have re-added the changes as https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/148664413, again changing halt → station.

In retrospect I realise I should have been more selective in my revert and not wiped out the rest of your changeset (which does contain some other small changes apart from halt → station). Apologies for that.

Unilaterally making the halt → station changes again and not mentioning it here feels a bit unconstructive to the discussion, to me.

How do you reconcile the tagging (as station) with the fact that the operator calls these ‘halts’?