It seems that you used the nearby river to align your imagery to before mapping. Although the instructions do state to align with existing data, once you start to offset imagery by tens of meters you should consider the strength of the evidence you're basing that decision on. For instance, this river was added in 2017 and does not appear to be mapped in great detail. The course of rivers can be dynamic and change significantly over time, which is why I would generally not recommend using them to align imagery. Idealy you should use 'static' features at ground level to align imagery to. I also could not find any nearby GPS traces to justify this significant offset. For these reasons I will mark this changeset as bad. The data you've added and modified could have confused future users. Don't worry; it doesn't appear to have, and I'll shift the mapping to align with the imagery. Just consider this feedback in your future mapping. Thank you for your contribution.
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157762362
            