I honestly think that the state of the engraving should *not* go into the `name`-Tag.

I recently stumbled over many of the boundary stones here, because 600 (!) of them are mapped with `name=|` which is - in my opinion - just plain wrong: https://osm.li/WOb

I absolutely *love* the resulting https://umap.osm.ch/fr/map/bornes-historiques-de-neuchatel_3405, but the `name`-Tagging smells of "tagging for the presentation", and not correctly using the tag.

@clwacker, can the `name` tag describing the engraving not go into something like `description:engraving`?

Greetings from Bern,
habi