I do not agree that my title was misleading and I doubt that fixing your concerns, which I would have done gladly, would have been worse compared to erasing. Since improving the position of tram switches inherently modifies the tram routes it is part of, I would love to discuss how I can make it less misleading. It would have been difficult to avoid modifications to the tram depot, because it shared nodes with the tram rails. Since the building was topologically inconsistent with the surrounding area and intersections with rails I chose to redraw it and maybe I shouldn't have considered it to be minor. Though it should be reasonable with my prior response to your message about all those edits in mind. Could you please tell me if anything was unclear?