there are trees added in this changeset that are in the middle of water and some that are not there on the latest imagery (bing aerial). There is also the fact that, from what I can tell you have in meany parts of the gardens added only a subsection of the trees in the area so it might be better to do some of these as areas. I would not be against utra micro mapping out every individual tree in the main part of Fairchild but if that is to be done, it should be aligned correctly to the bing or "Esri World Imagery" and every tree should be added, along with adding `leaf_type`, `species`, `species:wikidata`, `leaf_cycle` and `denotation` tags to each. 
This comment also applies to changeset 170331276.

Happy mapping,
Udar.