@ftrebien
Hello.
It is very common to find such misconceptions in Europe too. And it is sadly becoming very frequent that local communities agreeing in just ignoring the wiki and take into consideration only what they want in order to make OSM look how they want to.
You just picked up one island of thousands the fit your criteria and went on with that. How about a complete survey?
On the wiki segment you are citing as an argument, after being totally dismantled and proved out of context, you are just holding on to just one line, and taking it out of context again.
You talk about a community but let´s dig into that. The whole sector you are claiming to map under a community agreement was made entirely by members of the Chilean community (take a look into the history of each and every road please). Those categories went on for years even under your own mapping activity, which included several names that you removed after some months.
Did you contact the community? No. So is there another community? Because it doesn´t seems so. And if it does, they are adding motorcar roads to a system that connects some camps.
It is clear to me that you are stuck on that sector moving things over and over again and never discussed with nobody. Not that it is wrong to map only one sector, but please take a deep look into correct mapping.
We had to correct an unclassified road into Mount Vinson from you.
Then again, please join the Chilean community. There, around 200 mappers share doubts every day.

regards
