@The RedBurn in the openstreammap project, the frequency of using translation is not at all important.
The proof of the existence of translation as such is already sufficient. The essence of the allpenstreetmap project is to have local names in name and not names from some little-known databases. During the discussion, you want to push us all to forget about the main rule of the project. Sorry, but it won't. Look for arguments that fit within the  rule on the ground

A link to a discussion 4 years ago is not an argument at all.

Then 4 years ago in the French Wikipedia there was only a translation of Kiev
Now the circumstances have changed and we proceed from new circumstances, namely the fact that the translation of Kyiv is in the French Wikipedia.