Hi, just coming back to the task of completing the renaming and coding of the EST hiking routes.

I noticed two "hickeys", using Way Marked Trails.

The first was in the cycling route from Albany to Green Island.  This was showing both cycling and walking netwok codes.  I have removed the walking parts.  This change seems OK.  Would you please check.

The second was a 16 km section from Fairground to DeWitt tagged as walking.

This is part of relation headed as Empire State Trail (Super bike) and referencing empiretrail.ny.gov and the REF=EST

You will be aware of a route relation referencing www.canals.ny.gov/trails and the REF=ECT.

The route duplication is most apparent on Erie Boulvard East (Syracuse) at the eastern end of this section as it approaches Bridge Street.

The route referencing EmpireTrails.NY is on a footpath.

The route referencing Canal.NY is on the nearby cycleway.

When selecting either of these, WayMarkedTrails-cycling shows a distance over 1200 km.  

While it seems one or the other route relation is redundant, I felt unable to decide which.

It might also be helpful, for the names of relations at national (and regional) levels have "cycling" or "hiking" added as a way to add clarity.

Are you able to oblige on this wash up?
