That's why I left the next segment below as is with its warnings and marked private access. That one to the south is wide enough for people to use without walking on the tracks. Though it's technically trespassing when used by the public. In this case, someone else also noticed that this path looks questionable, which I agreed with. I struggled to see the full path in the satellite imagery. It's very narrow in segments. So my basis of removing it is based on it actually existing. This isn't like the historical railroads where they have been completely removed (razed) with buildings on them. At least those existed at one point. This path seems more like wishful thinking based on the history than it being a real physical path.