Since Gullrisvägen is not an exit. If you enter Honungsvägen, there is no exit, except for the same way back.

If you read the clearly stated rules, it says:
"Use the noexit=yes tag only on the very last node node at the end of a highway=* or on the last way"
Did you do that? Put the existing no exit tag on the node at the end or at the, as it was, on the last way?
Or did you just delete surveyed information just because it didn't fit a general rule (which rarely can be applied without errors on a global scale)?

All theese kind of tools have a good purpose. They are also good help to find potential errors. The problem is when people or organisations exclude the judgement and leave out the will to make a better map from the existing data. If you delete surveyed information that might, or might not, have some error then you can close the case quick. And the more large scale, far away from local knowledge you do and the less thought spent on each case, the more money you make per hour maybe? Do you see the problem here?

Most cases you linked to was me touching a way, not adding a no_exit and definitively not deleting the data, since I lack local knowledge. Sometimes errors are obvious and easily fixed by anyone, sometimes it's not.