Hi Mashin, I will make sure to also add the correct data to the color tag moving forward. The main reason I am naming the trails this way is because the trail name is the only information that is visible on the numerous hiking/running/biking/outdoors platforms that utilize OSM data. For example, Strava, AllTrails, GaiaGPS, Garmin, etc only show the OSM trails and the trail name. Therefore without the trail name, it is usually more difficult to plan routes and navigate on official trails vs other mapped trails. In a lot of these state parks, the official trail name is often the color of the blaze. I have also relied on other examples where the official trail name and blaze color were both included in the trail name tag. Alternatively, I have also seen trail names just be descriptions such as "connector to XYZ road". I think having a descriptive trail name (with color, official name, or other key descriptor) greatly enhances the usability on platforms that may not show the underlying OSM data and tags. This should allow users to more easily figure out which trails are more "official" or more likely to be well traveled, and can also help users orient themselves with the actual map of the specific park or area.