Thank you for your feedback. I completely understand the importance of keeping existing physical features mapped.

However, the reason this issue keeps coming up is that the private driveway at 49 Erland Rd was mapped, while the neighboring property’s driveway at 43 Erland Rd had not been. Routing engines therefore directed delivery drivers to trespass across my private property to reach 43 Erland Rd.

I have now added the correct driveway for 43 Erland Rd, and it connects properly to the public road.

To prevent further confusion and unauthorized routing, could we please keep a note or tag clarification here such as:
note=No connection between 49 Erland Rd and 43 Erland Rd; driveway at 49 is private and not for through access.

This should maintain mapping accuracy while helping routing systems interpret the access restrictions correctly.

Thanks for helping ensure the map reflects both the real layout and the private nature of the driveways.