I disagree with deleting this feature. The boundary is a bit arbitrary, it's fair to say, but I had visited that area and assessed the vegetation, then used satellite imagery to mark boundaries. I can see you've marked some construction features on the east side, and I'm open to refining the geometry to reflect that development. As for being overly large, I'm not sure what issue you're running into, this isn't an exceptionally large feature, either by area or vertices, could you clarify? If I don't hear back from you I intend to revert this change.