Hello,

The fact that you've put the value "path" instead of tracks attracted my eye. So I checked you contribution and sorry to say that I'm quite sure you're mistaken about the connection here: https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/12840541546 . If you've had been on site, you should have known there's a ravine between the two ways (see LIDAR). So either there's a bridge, or heavy off-road vehicles drive across it directly or go all the way down into the ravine (sometimes they do this), but the position of your plotting on both ways doesn't reflect any of these cases.

This way https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1387067323 continues to NW and gets out of the forest a bit above this node https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/11085689156

As for this way www.openstreetmap.org/way/162142913 you made continue, what you see on the aerial photos might just be a landmarking for the parcel limit, there is one according cadastre roughly on there (it's sometimes not precise).