Hey, yeah I'm leaning that Avalon is now appropriately tagged. What my comment is getting at is that this area has a lot of close-by parallel primaries: Vermont, Figueroa, Main, Avalon and Central. It's possible that their all roughly equally important for crosstown traffic and all thus deserve to be highway=primary. But I tend to find that a lot of the LA area has "too many primaries", and that a more hierarchical scheme, where there are more secondaries than primaries for example, is often a better description of the real relationship between streets in the area.

From aerial imagery, it seems like much of Main, Fig, and Central in this area are two through lanes each direction, are they all really equal in importance to Vermont and Avalon, which appear to have 3? I'd guess at least one or two of them is not, but I lack the on-the-ground knowledge to confidently say which. (Though that's not to imply that every road should be tagged strictly by its lane count: there can be relatively wide, unimportant roads and relatively narrow, important roads. But lane count is often correlated with importance)