Hi Zarr,

Thanks for your changes here and all your other regular contributions.

I have noticed that we map "combined curbs" a bit differently (for example nodes 8177740855 vs 8177740857).  I am not convinced my method of adding two curbs to each corner is best and I don't want to add incorrect/misleading data to the map. The wiki is not clear and I am wondering if your method is adequate. Is it appropriate to have > 2 ways connected to a single curb node?
(I am aware that you also map two curbs in instances where they are clearly separate, such as node 5765177201)

Or, could we both improve how we map combined curbs? Would mapping them like node 11608418585 make more sense? If someone is crossing both roads they may not strictly need to step on to the first curb before starting their second crossing. In a situation where the 'intermediary' curb is raised but the other two are lowered, the data could be misleading. Routing for low-mobility users would interpret that the raised curb must be stepped on when in reality it could be bypassed. (I am probably over thinking all of this but curbs are one of the most tedious things I have decided to map so I definitely do not want to be spreading bad data.)

Thanks!
Joel