I'm fine removing the Jimbo's reference and most of the JT Express references, but I feel like we should leave at least one JT Express reference until Spread finishes construction and opens to the public. Locals will probably still refer to that location as JT Express until that happens. Would you prefer that I keep that in old_name , or keep it in name:2017--2023-10-28 ?

I don't have an OHM account and I'd prefer not to make a new account, cannot seem to log in via Github like I could for OSM. I have a few questions about your changeset:
- You created two chronology relations. One tracks Jimbo's->JT Express, the other tracks Tengu Sushi->JT Express. But the first chronology relation is named after the merged POI (JT Express), while the second chronology relation is named after the old POI (Tengu Sushi). Why is that?
- Should their be a chronology relation to track the occupancy of 170 Jackson Street (which would include Spread, JT Express, and Jimbo's)?
- Should their be a chronology relation to track the occupancy of 111 Paseo de San Antonio (which would include Spoonfish Poke and Tengu Sushi)?
- Should the JT Express node have tag(s) to indicate that it was formed from the merging of the Jimbo's and Tengo Sushi POI nodes? Or is there some relation type that can indicate this? You currently kind of have this specified via alt_name, but that didn't seem right to me.
- Was "Jimbo’s and Tengu Sushi" actually an alt_name for JT Express? Or is that made up? Could an entymology tag be used to indicate that the "JT" in "JT Express" was probably short for "Jimbo's and Tengu"? I don't know for certain if this is the case (I always assumed "JT" was short for Japan Town, until I learned about the history of Jimbo's and Tengu merging), but it seems very likely that it is.