The two examples you want to keep are typical of the situation.

Track 1196644936 is on private land that is totally inaccessible. Your aerial images are certainly old, because today it's been transformed. The most recent aerial images we have (Ortho 2021) show that the top of the runway has reverted to scrubland, but that illegal construction has taken place at the bottom. As for track 1196644932, if you go near it you'll at best be evicted at gunpoint, but I'd advise you not to try.

As you well understand, this is not our case. We, those who hike or hunt on the spot, who voluntarily clean (and make) the small public footpaths alongside Collectivité de Corse officials and map them on OSM, provide very up-to-date, relevant and usable information. It's these trails the concern. OSM is the only tool that allows us this cartographic agility, and we're very keen on it.It's important to understand that the layout of trails in South Corsica are constantly changing and constantly used. Before your crazy additions, almost all the usable trails *and only them* were listed on OSM.  Your additions create deleterious confusion.

For OSM mapping, the use of aerial images is an absolutely indispensable tool when it comes to constructions, but these same aerial images are a poor snapshot of public trails and paths. They only identify an ephemeral situation, at least in Southern Corsica, with a very high risk of error. There, only surveillance and GPS are reliable. This is the information we publish. Ranting based on obsolete aerial images, without knowledge of what is private and what is public, and without taking geological reality into account, can only generate data that is out of touch with reality and false.

That's why I'm asking you to withdraw all the trails and tracks you've added in southern Corsica, with total disregard for reality. There's no question of fighting path by path: these are just examples. It's your method that is wrong.