Man, no offense, but we have a list of places that were intended to be used as aerofields. But it's not an argument to change their status on "active"
This (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/1244631614) looks like working. Even some sats show planes on aerofield. 
But this (https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/79626211) - no. It can be used. In extreme conditions. But it's a disused aerofield. And I don't see a point to mark it as active
The same logic is for this aerofield. It's unused. There are no regular flights there. And I don't see even parts of the runway