Hi Taktaal,
Thanks for your feedback on my changeset and for pointing out the change to way/47410770 and the creation of node/12368699975.

I can see how this change might seem counterintuitive if you're expecting addresses on building polygons. My edit was based on the practice in Switzerland, where official address data (GWR - Gebäude- und Wohnungsregister) typically refers to the building entrance. Therefore, I've been mapping addresses as nodes at these entrance points. The node you highlighted is intended to be at the building's entrance and is not misplaced.

Regarding the building positions, I did notice that many building outlines in this area, including the one you mentioned, appeared to be offset from more current imagery sources. I've subsequently made adjustments to align these building outlines better in changeset www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/166039702.

The process I followed involves using authoritative data to place precise entrance nodes, which is why the address tag might have been moved from the building polygon to a dedicated node. This approach aims for higher precision as per local standards. You can find more context on this in the community discussions and the wiki.

This was a systematic update aiming to improve the accuracy of address data according to these local conventions, rather than a quick import. My intention is always to improve the map.