Hi Makeena, thanks for your detailed response. 

Given that these paths have been blocked at both ends for a few years now and are significantly overgrown (these forests change incredibly quickly, same happens in Sihlwald), I think they have indeed "fallen into serious disrepair". Otherwise, I think the "disused" lifecycle prefix would still apply. 

I believe "mapping what's on the ground" should also mean that unusable or formerly accessible paths should be marked with a lifecycle prefix. I last surveyed the area last summer, so will have a look again when I'm going up to Höhrohnen the next time. I would then take the liberty to revert the prefixes, if appropriate.

Happy mapping!