I do not have a facility in German,  sorry.

thank you for your observations

For me the issue is one of navigation.
If any part of a route does not have a name, then a route list will display "unknown highway" or similar.  
Using a route list when walking through a park, the example you give, it is helpful to know that is where you should be.  
Like using a road (driving, cycling or walking) the name won't say exactly which part of the road you are on.
So with paths through parks.  
Some walks may have a name signposted.
There seems to be every reason why that name should be entered in the database. 
And if a walk is not given a specific name, then the name of the park..

In summary, I am not suggesting paths in every part should be named.  Just those that form part of a route.

Be pleased to continue the discussion. 

Post script - I am currently walking in Franxe, Switzerland and Italy.   And soon I will be walking in Scotland, Wales and England.  
Because of this I have no editing facility until I return home in two months. 
I hope to make it start on Sultans Trail in 2024 or, more likely, 2025.



