Hi again conifermapper,

Thanks, that makes sense.

I'd make the case for tagging the upper reaches of this area as scrub, rather than woodland. When I walked it the other day the wood stopped at around the 300m contour. There are trees above, to about the boundary of the wood as you have it currently, but they're sparse and you can't find shade easily. To me 'wood' implies really thick tree cover. Certainly for navigation, I think showing such a large extent of woodland could be misleading if one were viewing the area from above, or from the valley opposite or alongside.

And since we have the scrub tag, we could show the difference. Ok if I make this change?

Kind regards,

eteb3