It seems that most footprints you mapped here are valid (visible in imagery) and have been appropriately squared but a significant proportion represent yards. I see no evidence that you used a secondary imagery source; this would I think significantly improve the quality of your mapping especially in this project. Sometimes it is difficult to tell what is a building in this project becasue some have dark roofs and look very similar to yards but cross referencing another imagery source can help A LOT. I wrote a proejct comment detailing how to do this. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168960717
            