Please do not mis-label legitimate OpenStreetMap quality assurance as "harrassment". We are making this map together, and we're all interested in OSM being a high quality map - which includes being legally spotless. 

You say that you have recorded these street names in person. A good way to bolster that claim in the future is to take a few photos of street signs which proves that you've actually been there. It's not something we would ask of someone adding the odd street name, but if someone adds streets names for a whole quarter and they just happen to be the same as Google's, then a few photos will go a long way to lift suspicions.

Your claim to be adding maps to Tom Tom, Google, and Apple simultaneously sounds implausible, especially as, while the NAMES in your OSM mapping are all identical to Google's, the geometries are not. If this is a story you want to stick to, we'll need some proof that allows us to see that roads have actually been added to these maps at the same time as they have been added to OSM.

Your work for the county GIS system is commendable but please keep it separate from OSM; the county might have a different bar for contributions than OSM. 