just wrote and sent this on email, but i think the email got lost, so i will paste it here instead:

thanks for the nice and complete feedback, marek!

now i understand what you mean, and now on a big screen i can easily see what you did: removed the name from the node i added. and even with your explanation, i can not agree with this edit. i would either revert it, or perhaps find together a better way to do what i need. pretty sure it would help a lot of people now, and perhaps even more so in the future as well (although i hope there will be much better ways to charge ev in the future).

on mobile, my main and hopefully soon to be back as only computer device i have (got a new big screen for now, after 5 years without one), i only really have 1 good way to access osm for the past few years: organic maps. it is also my primary map for everything. (today i just learned about osmapp.org, but even if it does work 100% as it stands today, it still lags behind om).

also, i only added this point (and so many more) because i can do it from om. and it requires a name. so if you really want to improve this process, not only from me, better open an issue with them.

but searching for cs anywhere stands as terrible. plugshare has been my favorite app  only because it has more data and ux woks. i kinda hate to contribute with it because it ain't open data and nobody outside of plugshare can really use their data. but there you can see a little bit of what osm misses. then i found recently 2 new apps that, all together, can paint the full picture of what i need in a map for charging stations: evmaps (from fdroid) and openchargemap. both use (the same) open data, and offer different important features missing from plugshare.

with all that said, giving a name to charging stations on osm is barely scratching the extra data needed for properly finding charging stations when needed.

make sense?