Hello rarad74,

This junction was originally modeled as a simple junction and I restored it as such based on OSM policy which indicates “roads are not to be mapped as dual carriageways if the two directions are only separated by paint. This includes single or multiple painted centre lines, hatched areas, channelized turn lanes, two-way turn lanes” (https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Dual_carriageway). Looking at aerial imagery and Mapillary (https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.11552551063838&lng=25.006321772432557&z=17&pKey=1222689252766690&focus=photo), there is only paint and no physical separation, which is in alignment with this policy.

My understanding of this policy is that modeling only useful detail over excessive detail allows the map to be maintained easier over time, as detailed paint separations can quickly become outdated or redesigned. Because this junction functions well without lane separation, it seemed reasonable to maintain its simplicity. That being said, If you see reason to keep the highway divided here, I am happy to defer to your edits.