I didn't mean to say that anything that merits UIAA should be considered climbing. I can certainly agree that levels 1 and 2 may not match the definition of climbing, strictly speaking. All I'm saying is that if the tag name is inadequate, we could consider changing it, but having two tags for different values of the same scale doesn't seem like a sustainable system.

I performed this edit because it seemed like, with an order of magnitude of difference in adoption, there was de facto consensus that `climbing:grade:uiaa` is a good enough key name, even if it's not ideal. But I'm definitely open to stand corrected if you disagree with this interpretation of the status quo.