> 99% of my edits are improvements to the map. 

Are you saying you use the 1% to damage the map? I assume no, but let me know if you disagree.

> Some of the “junk” you removed were perfectly valid ways. 

Yes, I removed that, and you can add it back. Not a big deal, the main one being removed is the non existent connector.

> Your adjustments to the roads are mostly tiny adjustments that make zero difference, especially compared to what was there before.

They make a big difference in higher zoom levels. You are describing an issue very common in those career GIS professionals, that you do not care much about details when it is out of your scope.

> If you spent as much energy on actually mapping areas that haven’t been touched in years instead of chasing my changesets, you could have improved the map a whole lot more than what you’ve done.

Yes, I have been doing this for years. Thanks for reminding me, you can check HDYC for the stats. Most of the TIGER cleanup of Susquehanna county is done by myself.

> Your comments are insulting and harassing.

Society works in a way that you can’t like everyone, and on the Internet it is amplified because we don’t know each other. Here at OSM I don’t use profanity to attack any person, I never have such attention as well. I don’t think the comment is harassing, considering the last time you disconnected the river for days, your name should have been mentioned already. If you don’t want to be mentioned, just map with no major issues.

> you need to leave me alone.

I would like to do that when you start to map with no major issues, you are doing better and hopefully you will graduate from the list when the bad habits from your GIS career go away. 