Hello and thank you for your contributions. However, this changeset is problematic because you did provide roughly estimated (or rounded?) width values for all of these cycleways. If you like to contribute at this very detailed level, please do provide precise width data, that is with at least 1 decimal value ;-)
Your values might be mistakingly interpreted by bicycle routers as describing poor quality cycling infrastructure (e.g. 1 m width is much narrower than the usual Swiss norm for a oneway cycleway)
Would you like to correct your data or do you prefer me to revert that changeset?
Cheers, Michael