Hi, most of the footprints you added here are valid. I flagged some footprints here which I think are clearly inaccurate or envelope multiple buildings. The imagery resolution for the primary source here is poor, so think about the most likely shapes of buildings; you are liable to be mislead by the imagery otherwise. Zooming out then back in IMO is crutial to better seeing identifying a building, its shape, and orientation. I highly recommend referencing a secondary source probably bing if you're using ID. I have posted about the imagery metadata, capture dates and offsets to use in the project comments. In this case the bing offset would be 2.45; 1.69 . Do you know how to offset imagery?
            ---
            
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/170380357
            