It is an interesting question this way, how the "dictionary-like" usage of Wikipedia and Wikidata counts, what sus242424 pointed out. Aka. checking the further name variants of already mapped features of OSM, one-by-one manually, not by any importing mechanism.

Sensum stricto, mcliquid is right, Wikipedia shall not be used in any cases as a source, according to the red box. No further question then.

But sus242424's comment also worth the consideration. As these features are already there in OSM, there is no geodata import in these cases. But rather information cross-check, according to mostly already linked Wikidata and Wikipedia pages, where only a foreign naming standard is checked. 