Gotcha, thanks! It seems my initial confusion stemmed from misreading the wiki guidance to say that cycleway crossings should only be used when cycleway crossings have a legal status distinct from _footway crossings_ as opposed to a distinct status from _plain cycleways_, which is why I initially tagged this (and others) as a footway crossing instead of a cycleway crossing (despite the latter seeming more intuitive).

Given both the legal status and also my misread, its clear tagging this as the latter indeed makes more sense, thanks, and I'll keep that in mind for other crossings.