Hi, the changeset comment here is invalid: it does not relate to any feautre you edited. The relations themselves are valid however, provided the forests were mapped similarly to how they are now; it seems unnecessary to map these residential areas as multipolygons. They are not enveloped by another relation in which they should be inners, and so could just simply be mapped as residential areas. Mapping them this way means that other contributors will just have a harder time editing them. If you remember; why did you map the residential areas in this way? See https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Mapping_style,_best_practice for a comparison of two methods of mapping multipolygons. Please keep this feedback in mind when contributing in future. Thank you for your contribution. If you want to experience the OSM community or to get timely feedback from other mappers; I recommend that you attend a mapathon. You can find events here https://osmcal.org/
            ---
            #REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/134375807
            