Hello,

I had to redo this edit.
You merely renumbered two UrbIS address points and gave both of them the same house number 221.  Not only this creates an unwanted duplicate address but also 221 is unknown in UrbIS, so we cannot let a node having this address and a reference number.
We’d better make number 221 a separate node.  I retagged the former nodes as non-existing addresses instead, to avoid generating errors when validating against UrbIS.
Have a nice day.