Thank you for clarifying why the revert was necessary. I understand that the revert tools can sometimes remove additional edits beyond the intended ones, and I appreciate you letting me know that’s why you usually try to contact contributors beforehand. I am already working on a new changeset to restore the details that were unintentionally lost during the revert.

I’m aware that the border in question is a disputed region and understand how sensitive these changes can be. My intention wasn’t to take a side or offend anyone, but simply to ensure accuracy, in fact, my only edit to the border involved merging two nodes that were very close together, purely for data cleanliness rather than altering the boundary. I now see that making any edits to such a disputed area requires extra care and  consensus. 

Thanks again for your guidance—your insights have been really helpful. I appreciate your help in making sure my contributions align with OSM’s best practices..


