Overall this is a high quality contribution. Well done! All buildings digitized in this changeset are in fact buildings, and the majority of them have accurate footprints, and are squared appropriately. 

There are some inaccurately shaped outliers however, which I believe is due to you missinterpreting the imagery. I encourage you use Mapbox imagery as a suplimental source, because it has a greater resolution in this area. That should help you better determine the shapes of buildings. 

If the available imagery is if poor quality you should interpret it and add buildings with likely shapes. Ask yourself: What shape is that building likely to be? Is it actually that shape, or does it just look that way on the imagery?

Thank you for your contribution!
            ---
            #REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
            Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158315601
            