Hi,

There are OSM problems with that relation.
See the QA tool https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=138.52990&lat=-34.65386&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Seethe OSM wiki https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:multipolygon

This looks very confused! The name is used multiple times... would this not be a single 'place' with the name? OSM guide says 'one feature = one OSM entry' I'd map an outer way with the name and a place=something tag. Then map the commercial etc landuses without a name... Hope that helps. 