Hello,
Just spotted you've changed the name of https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/10529390 to be the description again rather than the name.  I changed it in https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/142413576 following the broad consensus of https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/proposal-use-description-instead-of-name-for-route-relations/104656 .  I tend to agree with the forum discussion in that once "from" and "to" have been added to superroute members the "name" should just be the name, but it is true that many relations (in the UK and elsewhere) do have descriptions as names - do you think it's worth raising it in the UK bit of the forum specifically?
Best Regards,
Andy
