Hello,

No this "path" was not just the building garden. Before your edit there is certainly somme adjustement/correction  to do here but certainly not deleting the way and recreate  a new path for theses reasons : 

- Principe of good pratice : see https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Keep_the_history

- On the west part of the path you deleted there is in fact a footway that allow entrance to the building : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=1122943351924628 , this footway connect also the Street with steps (not yet mapped) : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=513273780630861

- On south the path was faulty (crossing the coursive wall) : but you recreate it on the same position, the existing one next to the pound is enough here.

- On east : there is a gate with a sign for no parking next to it and we can see that grass has  different texture following a line of something that looks like "klinkers" : https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=6404652808119672022  It's also well visible in Urbis Orthophoto 
2022 NS  So for sure there is a path with private access and probably a good reason for this (maybe Siamu, maybe technical for Foyer Laekenois) but in any case the path exist and should not be deleted.

I m affraid we need to reverse your changeset and make the correction but before that can you say if there is a connection on the north or a gate , or just a bollard ?

Have a good day,
Raphaël 



- 