From Large Language Models to Efficient System One Models via Adaptive Computation
Abstract
Transferring LLMs into System One decision models typically replaces the language modeling head with a decision head while retaining the full backbone, making every decision pay for all layers. Yet it remains unclear how much depth such decisions require. We find that decision information is concentrated in intermediate layers, with early layers building essential features and the final six layers removable without loss, while independently trained smaller models largely mimic the full model rather than developing specialized decision capabilities. These findings suggest that efficiency requires not simply smaller backbones, but shared computation across different depths. Building on this, we propose , which jointly trains a full model with prefix sub-models that share its final layers and decision head through self-distillation. A lightweight gate reads the hidden state at each exit to determine whether additional computation is needed, allowing one model to operate at multiple layers. Across seven decision benchmarks, our approach matches or outperforms independently trained models at every depth, while achieving better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs through adaptive computation.
Community
Transferring LLMs into System One decision models typically replaces the language modeling head with a decision head while retaining the full backbone, making every decision pay for all layers. Yet it remains unclear how much depth such decisions require. We find that decision information is concentrated in
intermediate layers, with early layers building essential features and the final six layers
removable without loss, while independently trained smaller models largely mimic the full model rather than developing specialized decision capabilities. These findings suggest that efficiency requires not simply smaller backbones, but shared computation across different depths. Building on this, we propose NESTONE, which jointly trains a full model with prefix submodels that share its final layers and decision
head through self-distillation. A lightweight gate reads the hidden state at each exit to determine whether additional computation is needed, allowing one model to operate at multiple layers. Across seven decision benchmarks, our approach matches or outperforms independently trained models at every depth, while achieving better accuracy-efficiency trade-offs through adaptive computation.
Finding that the last six layers can go without loss makes me wonder how much of a decision model is just along for the ride. Do the early exits line up with decisions that look easy to a person, or does the gate use a different idea of difficulty?
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- LEV: Thinking Fast and Deep with Looped Decision Models (2026)
- FunDM: Cheap&Label-Free Decision Models from Frozen Language Models (2026)
- Extending Reasoning in Typed Decision Models via Looping (2026)
- Large Decision Models: Repurposing Large Language Models as Single-Pass Decision Makers (2026)
- Releasing the Inner Jev: A Simple Recipe for Open Decision Models (2026)
- Improving JEV Entailment Reranking with Span Readouts and Selective Adaptation (2026)
- Telescopic Language Models (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2611.16321 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 1
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper