Corrected a javadoc comment
@@ -102,9 +102,9 @@ public interface CommonConfiguration {
* </P>
* <UL>
* <LI>The field type, whether it's a list or not, is replaced by the relevant XxxConnection type. For instance the
- * query <I>allHumans(criteria: String): [Human] <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I></I> is replaced by
- * <I>allHumans(criteria: String): HumanConnection</I>, and the human's field <I>friends: Character
- * <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I></I> is replaced by <I>friends: CharacterConnection</I>. Please note that :
+ * query <I>allHumans(criteria: String): [Human] &#064;RelayConnection</I> is replaced by <I>allHumans(criteria:
+ * String): HumanConnection</I>, and the human's field <I>friends: Character &#064;RelayConnection</I> is replaced
+ * by <I>friends: CharacterConnection</I>. Please note that :
* <UL>
* <LI>The <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I> directive is removed in the target schema</LI>
* <LI>If the <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I> is set on a field of an interface, it should be set also in the same
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ public interface CommonConfiguration {
* field, for one type that implements this interface, then an error is generated. The directive is applied on the
* interface and its implementations's field, whether or not the directive is actually set in the implementing
* classes.</LI>
- * <LI>Input type's fields may not have the <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I> directive</I>
+ * <LI>Input type's fields may not have the <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I> directive</LI>
* </UL>
* </LI>
* <LI>For each type marked at least once, with the <I>&#064;RelayConnection</I> directive (the <I>Human</I> type,
