Dataset Viewer
The dataset viewer is not available for this dataset.
The JWT signature verification failed. Check the signing key and the algorithm.
Error code:   JWTInvalidSignature
Exception:    InvalidSignatureError
Message:      Signature verification failed
Traceback:    Traceback (most recent call last):
                File "/src/libs/libapi/src/libapi/jwt_token.py", line 286, in validate_jwt
                  decoded = jwt.decode(
                      jwt=token,
                  ...<2 lines>...
                      options=options,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jwt.py", line 368, in decode
                  decoded = self.decode_complete(
                      jwt,
                  ...<8 lines>...
                      leeway=leeway,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jwt.py", line 265, in decode_complete
                  decoded = self._jws.decode_complete(
                      jwt,
                  ...<3 lines>...
                      detached_payload=detached_payload,
                  )
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jws.py", line 270, in decode_complete
                  self._verify_signature(
                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^
                      signing_input,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  ...<4 lines>...
                      options=merged_options,
                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
                  )
                  ^
                File "/usr/local/lib/python3.14/site-packages/jwt/api_jws.py", line 417, in _verify_signature
                  raise InvalidSignatureError("Signature verification failed")
              jwt.exceptions.InvalidSignatureError: Signature verification failed

Need help to make the dataset viewer work? Make sure to review how to configure the dataset viewer, and open a discussion for direct support.

Iconclass VLM — brill full labels

Training-ready VLM iconclass-classification dataset rebuilt from the fuller, cleaner source labels in biglam/brill_iconclass (CC0). Recovers labels lost to truncation in davanstrien/iconclass-vlm-sft.

  • Source images: same Brill Arkyves images as biglam/brill_iconclass, bytes passed through verbatim (no re-encode).
  • Labels: full Iconclass codes with operators (+n), key-combos :, and qualifiers (TEXT) kept intact. Empty/sentinel tokens stripped; ~5 malformed free-text codes dropped.
  • Avg codes/image: 4.359 (vs 3.542 in the truncated iconclass-vlm-sft).
  • Label cap: codes/image capped at 20 (1446 images had their long tail trimmed).
  • License: CC0-1.0.

Splits

Split Images
train 86216
test 788

The test split is a contamination-safe held-out set: images are assigned to train/test by a deterministic hash of the Brill filename, so the two image sets are guaranteed disjoint and the split is fully reproducible.

Schema (drop-in compatible)

Every row carries a superset of fields so the existing training/eval scripts work unchanged:

Column Type Consumer
image Image train_grpo.py (raw image + label)
label list[str] train_grpo.py ground truth
images list[Image] train_sft.py / eval_sft.py
messages conversational train_sft.py / eval_sft.py

The assistant message content is {"iconclass-codes": [...]}; the user turn uses the same instruction string as train_grpo.py.

Configs

  • defaulttrain + test splits.
  • sfttrain split (same rows as default/train), for train_grpo.py --dataset-config sft and train_sft.py.

Build

Built by build_brill_dataset.py. Label cap: 20 codes/image.

Research context & key finding

This dataset was built to test whether the iconclass classifier's ~25% recall ceiling was caused by truncated training labels (the original iconclass-vlm-sft was capped at 3.54 codes/image; this restores the full Brill labels at ~4.36).

Re-SFT on these fuller labels did not improve the model. Training converged well (eval_loss 0.47) but on the contamination-safe test split it scored H-F1 45.3 / hier-recall 46.4 — recall unchanged. The bottleneck is model capability (identifying the right codes), not label completeness. The lever that did work was anchored fusion (the fine-tuned model as a precision anchor + a graded VLM-judge gating in semantic-retrieval recall → H-F1 47.5 / hier-recall 57.6, with no extra training).

Splits & contamination

  • train (86,216) / test (788), split deterministically by image filename hash (disjoint).
  • The test split is clean for models trained on this dataset's train split. Older checkpoints trained on the overlapping iconclass-vlm-sft images are contaminated on it.
Downloads last month
42

Models trained or fine-tuned on davanstrien/iconclass-vlm-brillfull